Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANATIIA MANDAL'S
ENGINENNING COLLEGE. BDLGA[]D[.
([rrtifirntr
DEPARTM ENT OF ...
Valued:
Exa miners: 1) 2)
FgA TEATETA MA]TI}AL'S NNGI1TEENTNG
C€BE-,LEGH, IIELGAUM - T6.
NYI}NX
i\i nI\iif CLASS :
BATCH : DIVISION:
ROLL No:
i-
l-,-.-,,--
I
FeE & H€ATEHA IYIANI}AL'S E ITGI1TE E HIING
COLLEGI'. IIELGAUUI . I 6.
TIYDEX
NAI'VIE : CLASS :
BATCH : DIVISION:
ROLI Nlo:
l-..
l-__
I
I
I
I
t---,---
I
I
I
COMPUTER AIDED MODELING AND ANALYSIS
I rrtroductit;n:-
Mathematically. the finite eletrent method (FEM) is used for finding approxitnate
solution of Partial Differential Equations (PDE) as well as of Integral equations such as the heat
transport equation. The solution approach is based either on eliminating the differential equation
cornpleteh, (steadl' state problerns), or rendering the PDE into an equivalent ordinary differenti4_l
qcl-Uqlialt" which is then solved r-rsing standard techniques such as finite ditl'erences, etc.
over the entire dornain. F'or instance, in simulating the weather pattern on Earth, it is more
intportant to harze acculate preclictions over land than over the wide-open sea, a dernand that is
achievable using the finite element method.
Introduction:-
It is r-rot alrvays possible to obtain the exact analytical solution at any location in
the bocly, especially fbr those elemenls having complex shapes or geometries. Always lvhat
matters are the boundary conditions and material properlies. In such cases, the analytical soh-rtion
that satisfies lhe governing equation or gives extreme values for the governing functional is
dilficLrlt to obtain. Hence for most oI'the practical problems, the engineers resort to numerical
nrethods like tire finite element methocl to obtain approximate but most probable solutions.
Finite element procedures are at present very widely used in engineering analysis.
T'he procedures ale ernployecl extensivc'l-v in the analysis of solids and structures and of heat
transl'er and fiuids. and indeed. finite element methods are useful in virtually every field of'
enginecring analysis.
rt'iathematical rnodels, bLrt it is important to realize that the finite element solution can never give
more infonlation tiran that contained in the mathematical model.
Pagc 2
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
COMPUTER AIDED MODELING AND ANALYSIS
It is clcar that the finite element solution will solve only the selecred mathematical model
and that ail assumptions in this model will be reflected in the predicted response. Hence, the
cl.roice of an appropriate mathematic'al model is crucial and completely determines the insight
into tl're actual phy'sicaI problcnt that rve tibtain by the analysis.
Once the mathenatical model has been solved accurately and the results have been
interpreted, we may well decide to consider next a refined mathematical model in ordel tcr
increase our insight into the response of the physical problem. Further more, a change in the
ph1''sical probiem ntav be necessar)'. and this in turn will also lead to additional mathematical
nrociels ancl fitite elenrent solutions. Fig.l. depicts the process of finite element analysis. The key
step in engineering analysis is therefore choosing appropriate mathematical models. These
models will clearly be selected depencling on what phenomena are to be predicted.
Change of
physical
problem
Mathematical model
Governeci by differential equations
Assumptions on
. Geometry lmprove
. Kinernatics mathematical
- Material law model
. Loading
- Boundary conditions
. Etc.
I
-----J
Design improvements
Structural optimization
coliection of simple domains, called frnite elements. The following are the three basic features of
'!'
the f,rnite element method.
- a) Division o./ whole into parl.s'; rvhich allows representation of geometrically complex domains
:ts collection of'simpie don-rains Lhat enable a systematic derivation of the approximation
tiructions.
b) Derivcttion of upltroxintations /unclirms over each element; the approximation functions are
oftert algebraic poiynornials that are derjved using interpolation theory.
c) As.scmbl,v t,f elerncnl.r. u,l-iich is based on continuity of the solution and balance of internal
f-iuxes
The basic equation used to solve the static analysis problem is:
fior determinirrg stresses ancl deflections the foilowing steps of the analysis are essential:
_
a) Preparation of input data: The recluisite data for the given problem is geometry (i.e.mociel),
,r-raterial propefiies and bor-rndai'y conditions (i.e. loads and constraints).
-
b) SolLrtion: Tiris involr.'es solving the necessary equations to calculate the unknown parameters.
c) Arrangements of results: The results obtained for stress analysis may be presented in the fonn
a) Preprocessing
b) Solr-rtion
c) Post-processing
u) Preprocessing:'Ihis phase consists of making available the input data such as geometly,
material properties, meshing olthe model. boundary conditions and has the following steps:
1) Set up: Het'e we enter the analysis type, the material properties, and the geometry (i.e.
prepare tl-re model). The rnodel may be built parametrically or a model from other software
2) Create FE n-roclel: In this step r,ve divide the total volume into small simple regular
voltttnes, which can be easily meshed. Then we define the mesh size for each small volurne by
virtr-rally dividing all the edges of the smalI volume into same divisions.
3) Loaciing: ln this step the boirndarl'conditions are imposed, i.e. forces and constraints, on
the nrodel are defineci.
b) Solution: In this phase a solver is used to solve the basic equation for the analysis type and to
compute the results. This phase is tahen care by the software programme. In the solution process,
the solver goes throLrgh fbllowing steps to compute the solution for a steady state analysis,
c) Postproces,sing. This is the phase lvhere the results are reviewed for the analysis done, by
obtair-ring graphic displays, vector-plots and tabular reports of stress and displacement, etc.
Lihe solving an)' problen-r analytically. you need to define (1) your solution domain, (2)
the phvsical model, (3) boundary conditions and (a) the physical properties. You then solve the
problem and present the results. In numerical methods, the main difference is an extra step called
mesh generation. This is the step that divides the complex model into small elements that
become solvable iu an otherr,vise too complex situation. Below describes the processes ilr
ierminology slightl,v ntol'e attulte to the sofiware.
Builtl Ceometry:-
Now tl-rat the palt exists, define a library of the necessary materials that compose the
object (or project) being n.iodelecl. T'his includes thermal and mechanical properties.
Generate Mesh:-
At this point ANSYS understancls the makeup of the part. Now define how tl-re modeled
Apply Loads:-
Once the system is fully designed, the last task is to burden the system with constraints,
such as phl,sicai loadings or boundary conditions.
Cbtain Solution:-
'firis is actually a step, because ANSYS needs to understand within
what state (steady
state, transient... etc.) the problem must be solved.
Atier the solutiotr has been obteLined, there are many ways to present ANSYS' results,
choose liorn many options such as tables, glaphs, and contour plots.
FE MESH GE,NERATIOI{
Afier validation of the model rrext step is generation of Finite Element Mesh. For the casing
SOLID elements are used tbl meshing. A very f-rne mesh creates the hardware space oroblem because
the computations become voluminous. As the number of nodes increases, the total degrees of
freedom of the model increases Hence a designer has to model it optimally i.e. placing fine mesh
onl,v at critical area. anc'l coarse mesh at other. So that the run time is less and also the accuracy
:ii--
F-Gc:sh relinenrent:-
After generation of coarse mesh. it is refined as per the geometry and critical sections of the
model. It can be refined in three different ways as follows
'i h-refinement : Here eiement size is changed (decreased) without changing the element type.
F p-refinement : Ilere element type is changed (to higher order) without changing element
size.
size.
A p refinement converges to the solr-rtion fbster than h - refinement. Fig.3. shor.vs tl're
above-cliscussed r.r,ays ol mesh refinement, 'h' refinement is used near the fillet area and 'r'
refinement used at other locations.
Mesh transition:-
Mesh transition occurs when refined mesh interfaces with coarse mesh. It connects
different types of elements. One comrnon method of performing a transition is to use an intermediate
a'-
Mesh generation:-
Entroduction:
In order to carry out a finite element analysis, the model we are using must be divided
into a number of srnall pieces known as f-rnite elements. Since the model is divided into a number
oi discrete parts. FEA can be described as a discretization technique. In simple terms, a
ntatltematicai net or "rnesh" is required to carry out a finite element analysis. If the system under
investigation is 1D in rrature. we nrav use line elements to represent our geometry and to carr\r
ot"tt our anal,vsis. If the problem can be described in two dimensions, then a 2D mesh is reqtiired.
(iorrespottdingly, if the problern is complex and a 3D representation of the continuum is
rcclr"rirc-d. then lve nse a 3D mesh.
Arca meshing:-
Area elements can be triangular or quadrilateral in shape. The selection of the element
shape and order is based otr considerations relating to the complexity of the geometry and the
n.ttllre of tite problent being modcled. Membrane elements don't have any thickness. As a
corlseqllence they have no bending stiffness; loads can only be carried in the element plane. Plate
& Shell eiements are used to model thin walled regions in 3D space. The plate element is
forrnulated around plate theory. u,hich assLrmes that the load is carried via bending. Shell
elemcrtts are usecl to model shells, where there is combination of flexure & membrane action.
Plate elet-nents are considered applicable where the out of plane distortion is little more than the
plate thickness. There are also special elements,.which facilitate accurate modeling of thick
plates. If the deflection is greater than the plate thickness, membranes action should be
considered, and so shell elements should be used. Shell element nodes have five degrees of
h'eeciotn; tl're missing is the in-plane rotational lreedom (sometimes referred to as the drilling
lieedon'r). Solid elements come in diiferent varieties. Axis symmetric elements are used to
describe the cross-section of an axially symmetric parI. Plane strain elements are used to describe
section of long ob.iects (such as a shaft or wall cross-section). The strain in the out-of-plane
clirection is taken to bc zero, rcl'lcctins the assumption that the strain is in one Plnne strcss
elements are used lo describe sections o1'thir-r objects (such as a wrench). The stress in the or.tt-ol--
plane direction is takeu to be zero, r:eflectir,g the assumption that the stress is in one plane. The
trvo dimensional elements are shown in Fig .5.trelow.
a plane element (plane stress or plane strain) or as an axisymmetric element. The element is
deflned by four nodes having two clegrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal x
and y directions. The element has plasticity, creep, swelling, stress stiffening, large deflection,
and large strain capabilities shown in fig.beiow.
+ - -------rf''
l-l
L r_----
,.r\
l4,l
,i
,..
!'
1
i K.L
..t\ \.
'-'_ t" I
,k_ t'I
:''
s,
1
Volumc meshing:-
3D elements take the form of cubes called hexahedrons (hexes), 3D triangles called
tctrahedrons (tets) and iD u,edges lmown as pentahedrons. Decisions on element selection
hinge on understanding the role of the element shape and order of interpolation.
Modeling with 3D-Elements is t1're most llexible approach. These types of elements are
Lisecl tbt'thicli str"irclures that have neither a constant cross section nor an axis of symmetry. Solid
nrocieling u'ili nearly alr,vays make anai.r'sis preparation easier. Meshing and solving can take zr
long time, particularly if the structure is thin-walled (large numbers of elements are requirecl tcr
produce a rnesh). The three dimensional element are shown in Fig.6. below.
PART-A
Exp No:- I
r\lM:- Determine the nodal displacement, stress & strain for given sketch.
F,... 2.1r 105 N,'rlnr2 . pr- 0.25
D= 50 mm 1500N
300 mm
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
Structural
NODE FX FY
1 -1500.0 0 .0000
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE -1500.0 0. 0000
I!ODAL LOAD
\TnnE rv FY
1 1500.0
2 -1500.0
TOTAL \/AIUES
VALUE O. OOOO 0.0000
NODAL SOLUTION
THE FOLLOWING DEGREE OF TREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAI COORDINATE SYSTEM
NODE tIX
1 0. 0000
2 0.LO9748-O2
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VAIUES
NODE 2
VALUE 0.10914E-02
L..xp No:- 2
AIM:- Determine the nodal displacement, stress & strain for given sketch.
E;)xl05 N/mm',E1-- 0.7x10s N/mm2
, AL = 90C mm2
Az= 600 mm2
Lt = 0.25 s00 N
[=0.3
600 mm 500 mm
PROBLEM SPECIFICAT'ION
i- e ve I i, t'Dlti.,ttti: Easy
Structural
Linear static
RESULT:.
,., i
*-.*_x
: ,i l.:. i : :'-",.:r i:::: ,,i.
NODE FX EY
1 -500.00 0.0000
TOTAL VAT,UES
VALUE -s00. 00 0. 0000
NODAL LOAD
NODE FX FY
l- s00 .00
3 -500 .00
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE -0 .56843E-l-3 0. oooo
NODAL SOLUTION
! THE EOLLOWING DEGREE OE TREEDOM RESULTS ARE TN THE GLOBAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
1 0.0000
2 0.166618-02
3 0.761908-02
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 3
VALUE 0.76190E-02
Exp No:- 3
AIM:- Determine the nodal displacement, stress & strain for given sketch.
E:2,105. pr: 0.25
1000N
Azs.a
375 mm 375 mm
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
Easy
Discipline Structural
lA nalysis type
I
Linear static
Beam - Taper 54
t,t uSvs e*t, res l)emonstrated 1-D modeling including primifives, Boolean
l^ operation & Tapered, Load-Force/Moment,
deformed shape & Stress display, listing of
reaction forces.
RESULT:-
!tcf,&L i:*l,t_tTiCl!
i:TF D= l tlAT i 3 :rji.rtr
!t 1 !-., ,?
v. I'l'1.': =. n0
Il.li: *, rrii5(t:
3 €l 3
1,, .'..
\-
\-
,:
\-
_l
THE F"OLLOWING DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAL COORD]NATE SYSTEM
NODE UX
1 0.0000
2 0.788318-02
3 0. 56431E-02
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 3
VALUE 0.56431E-02
I\IODAI- LOAD
NODE MZ
1 1000.0
" -1000.0
TOTAL \TATrmq
VALi'E 0.11369E-12 0.0000 0.0000
NODE FX FY MZ
1 -r-000.0 0.0000 0.0000
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE *1000.0 0.0000 0.0000
Exp No:- 4
AIM :- Determine the nodal displacement, stress in each node element for the sketch given
below. E:2x105 N/mm2, Ar:1500 mrn2. Ar: A:l:2000 mm2
150 KN
Discipline Structural
_l
:llArttlT1rtl rvAm*r),tLL's ENGLUEBBLNG 0OLLEGE t Er,Garnw. Page 25
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
COMPUTER AIDED MODELING AND ANALYSIS
NODAL SOTUTION
THE FOLLOW]NG DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
NODE UX
1 0.0000
2 0.20000
3 0. 10000
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 2
VALUE O .2OOOO
NODE EX FY
1 -0.145528-10 75000.
2 75000.
TOTAI VALIIES
vAruE -0.145528-l_0 0.150008+06
Erp No:- 5
AIM:- Determine the nodal displacement, stress in each element for the sketch given below. E:
21105 N/mm2
2500 N
2000N
400 mm
PI{OBLEM SPECI]TICA IION
t-liscipiirre
*--
Analysis type Linear static
__*rt
E,xp No:- 6a
AIM:- Determine the nodal shear force" bending moment diagram & reaction for the following.
?o N/m
/
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
Discipline
F-tSULT:-
=
i:-t*i i*G idOMENT DIAGRAM
AN
NODE FY MZ
1 4000.0
2 4000.0
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE O. OOOO 8000. o 0 - 0000
NODAL SOLUTION
THE EOLLOWING DEGREE OE EREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAI COORDINATE SYSTEM
NODE UY
1 0.0000
2 0.0000
4 -O.287628-04
5 -0.52778E-04
6 -0.685768-04
7 -O .7 407 4E-O4
8 -0.68576E-04
9 -0.52778E-04
1-0 -0 . 281 62E'-04
Exp No:- 6b
AIM:- Determine the nodal shear force, bending moment diagram & reaction for the following
Level of Difficuity
Discipline Structural
NODE FX EY MZ
r- t-333.3
2 2666.7
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE 0.0000 4000.0 0.0000
ruODAL LOAD
NODE FY
1 -1333.3
2 -2666.7
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE -4OOO. O
Exp No:- 6c
AIM:- Determine the nodal shear force. bending moment diagram & reaction for the following.
I-cvel of Difficulty
Discipline Structural
RESUTT:-
Atu
i\IODA!- SOLUTION
THE FOLLOI^IING DEGREE OF FREEDOM R.ESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
NODE UY
1 0. 0000
2 -0 " 86806E-03
3 -0.198908-04
4 -0.737388-04
5 -0.15361E-03
6 -0.252628-03
7 -0.364948-03
8 -0.48583E-03
9 -0.61L56E-03
10 -0.739508-03
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 2
VALUE _O.86806E_03
NODAL LOAD
NODE FY MZ
1 -5000.0 -0 . 12500E+07
TOTAI VAIUES
VAILIE O. OOOO -s000.0 -0.l-2500E+07
Exp No:- 6d
AIM:- Determine the nodal shear force. bending moment diagram & reaction for the following.
PROI]LEM SPECIITICA'I'ION
l)rsc'r;tlrne St.l,ctumt
I\N
:,:,'.': ;
NODAL SOLUTION
!
THE FOLLOWING DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESUITS ARE IN THE GLOBAI COORDINATE SYSTEM
NODE UY
1 0.0000
2 -0.231488-03
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 2
VALUE -0 .23148E-03
NODE FX r'Y MZ
.1 0.0000 2500 .0 0.416678+06
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE O. OOOO 2500.0 0.416678+06
I
Exp No:- 6e
AlNz[:- i)etermir-re ihe nodai shear fbrce, bending moment diagram & reaction for the following
25 N/m 300 mm
PROBI,EM SPIICIFICATION
Structural
AN
lr.i: _.
NODE FX FY t'12
1 1887.5
4 662 .50
TOTAL VAI,UES
VALUE O, OOOO 2550.0 0.0000
i\iODAI- SOi-UTlOru
THE EOLLOWING DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN THE GLOBAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
1 0.0000
2
-0.295't2E-05
3
-0.19329E-0s
4 0.0000
5
-O.746748-06
6
-0.1439lE-05
7
-0.203328-0s
B -0.24970E-05
9 -0 .28097E-0s
10 -0.296238-05
MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUES
NODE 10
VALUE -O.29623I.-05
ii,fi TI T TA 7,IIA LI ANIiA L'S ENGIIYD D BTNG COL LE GE BEL GA I]1vI. Page 51
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
COMPUTER AIDED MODELING AND ANALYSIS
NODAL LOAD
NODE F'Y MZ
1 -1887.5 -0. 10851E-09
2 0.29831E-09
3 50.000
4 -662 - sO -0.58208E-10
-0.23283E-09
6 -0.116428-08
7 0.4l-327E-08
8 -0.116428-08
9 -0.649028-08
10 0.16735E-07
TOTAI VAI,UES
VAITIE O. OOOO -2s00.0 0.l-1948E-07
Irxp No:- 6f
AIM:- Determine the nodal shear force, bending moment diagram & reaction for the following.
PROBLEM SPECIFTCAI'ION
Level of Difliculty
t)iii'pt,,re - Structural
,\N
NODE EX TI MZ
1 592.39
4 1,302 .6
TOTAL VALUES
VALUE O. OOOO r895. O 0.0000
NODAL SOLUTION
NODE UY
1 0.0000
2 -O.3A4218-O6
3 -0.39704E-06
4 0.0000
5 -0.38029E-06
6 -0.348068-06
7 -0.30079E-06
8 -0.23976E-06
9 -0.167128-06
10 -0 .859048-07
MAXIt4UM ABSOLUTE VAIUES
NODE 3
VALUE -0.39704E-06
NODE FX TY MZ
1 -s92.39 _0.363808_11
2 -0.58208E-10
3 6 " 618468_09
4 -L2A2 .6 _0. l-l-792E_09
5 9.84401_E-09
6 -o.t22248-O8
7 _0.46566E_09
B _0,23283E_09
9 9.69849E-09
r-0 0.232838-09
TOTAL VALI-IES
vALrrE 0.0000 -1875.0 0.2931-?E-09
\.
\.
\.
PART-B
Bxp No:- 7
AIM:- Determine the stress. deformation & strain for the following rectangular plate with
circular hole^
?5 mm
0tomm
---------)
Pressu re
30 mm
300 w/mm2
->
PROI]LEM SPEC]IFICATION
Lwcr J'Di{'llcLrlr}
Discipline St.*t"""l
Analvsis type Linear static
RESULT:.
DEFORMED SHAPE
t:i.:!: .- -
:. r r.t i
NODAL LOAD
NODE FX EY
-J. -4602.2 -L131.4
. 4 -4601.6 1131.4
66 -724A.2 7 60 .42
67 -6641.5 445.L6
68 -6378. 6 1otr 10
69 -6065. 6 54.234
'10 -57 60 . 0 -LO.770
v 77 -5594.8
72 -5536. 0
-20.554
-L .4546
73 -5592.0 L7 .137
74 -5"t 56 .2 8.1000
75 -6007 .7 -54.561
76 -6320 .7 -190.40
77 -6643.0 -442.33
\. 78 -7252.O -7 60 .14
L TOTA], VALUES
VALUE -9OOOO 0.35425E-09
\-
Exp No:- 8
AIM:- Find the temperature at each node & temperature gradient & displacement of given
sl<etr:h.
Ar= 20 mm2
Az = 600 mm2
Tr = 1000" Kr = 1500 w/m2k Ta = -10'c
Kz = 5 w/m2k
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
\ RESU[T:-
\. NODAL TEMPERATURE
\- T ll'lfl-l
\-
\.
AIM :- Find the tentperature at each node & temperature gradient & deformation for the given
sketch"
hi= 30 rv/m k
Ar=10m2
Az= 5 m2
Tr = 1000' c Kr = 25 w/m2k T: = -15"c
Kz = 10 w/m'k
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
Thermal
AIM :- Find the tetrperature of each node & stress & deformation of node for given sketch.
iri - 30 r,r,/mk. K:20 rv/rn2k
{- Tz =15" c
Tr = 900"c
Level of Difliculty
\- TEMPERATURE GRADIENT
\-
itijl.F_1. :j^ l-1, I 1 i-'i{ Ittu
\- :TEP: I
SLIE - t
r TlllE= l
- T 3:.: . ;.'"'c.: ,
F:'.'ii - ';
L
\* I
8H :,:
\-
L.
\,
l-.xp No:- 1I
I
il., 2 x I 0r N/nr2, pL-. 0.3. fieq- 0-.5000I{2. Ioad: cyclic & magnitude: 150N
Ar= 1m2
Az= 0.05 m2
1000 N
Level of Difficulty
60 to 90 minutes
St.*t"*l
Analysis type Harmonic
.l1.-,*
{'Jilrl
l5ari'l
:,j ll !l
,,r&j,t,! j.!._,
:; :;J
iit,0
1 5aL)
-!,l a r-i
;i j"'i'l
\-
Exp No:- 12
Ir. 2,I0r' N/m'. p- 0.3, freq: 0-800H2. Ioad: cyclic & magnitudr 200N.
200N
05m
PI{OI] LEM SPECIF ICATION
Drscrphne
- St.rct".rt
Ali"l.vs,s typ.- Harmor..rrc
Ii.: 1- '
ilA'i i. t :or:,'
l3: lir5I
9':iii
4jil
5a+
iii"}
;.1l
-l'_l
i. i i:i
:+
(t
\.
\-]:
\=-
i:.xp No:- 13
0.5 m
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
Discipline Structural
P.-.:iT: i
dlt Lt i ugg i,rl',' I t ^ari'(,
irii r 03::1
!
!
\_,
il'tPn,r?Lr!E ii frj-f.c:
ril-:rr1t{l
\: