Roberta Kelly, Self-representation

roberta@mortgagegaleria.com
5109 NE Ainsworth Street
Portland, OR 97218 T[503]849.4634

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

Roberta Kelly [09-1125-KI] 10-36111 NINTH CIRCUIT

Plaintiff,
v.
GARR M. KING, OR BAR#630432,
acting in his capacity as a Judge; BETTY B.
FLETCHER, WA BAR#31, acting in her
capacity as an Appeal Judge; STEPHEN
REINHARDT, CA BAR#28761, acting in his
capacity as an Appeal Judge; N. RANDY
SMITH, BRIGHAM YOUNG LAW, acting in
his capacity as an Appeal Judge;
ET AL.,
Defendants.
INDICTMENTS POST HASTE
[VERIFIED COMPLAINT]
F[215]204.5862, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, THE
CHAIR FOR THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA’S EXECUTIVE JUDICARY
F[202]224.3479, PATRICK J. LEAHY, US
CONSTITUTION, HUMAN-CIVIL-RIGHTS
THE UNITED STATES SENATE JUDICARY;
F[202]225.3974, DARRELL ISSA; ELIJAH E.
CUMMINGS, REPRESENTATIVES U.S.
CONSTITUTION GOVERNMENT REFORM;
F[415]355.8901, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
ALEX KOZINSKI, CA BAR#66473;
JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, CA BAR#91689;
ROBERT H. WHALEY, WA BAR#4323;
F[503]968.4457, JEFFREY D. SAPIRO,
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OR STATE BAR;
F[206]727.8325, WASHINGTON STATE BAR
F[801]531.0660, ROBERT L. JEFFS,
PRESIDENT, UTAH STATE BAR;
ET AL., ET CETERA

A plea to the Court system in the United States of America which posts on the leading website

for the institution, The envied Court of the World: (a) due to Defendants’ and non-representational

government’s occupation of our U.S. during my life, I have been one of the many in the steep learning

curve to protect unalienable rights. AND made a pauper intentionally by those whom feudal vs.

freedom FOR no less than one hundred [100] years or thereabouts; but, (b) in spite of the greatest

Page 1 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY
opposition We The People can thankfully due to the internet, as common persons and therefore a

people-hood STAND against apartheid with the true chosen few; thankfully, (c) in the good law;

(d) NEW CASE NUMBER assigned PLEASE VERIFIED COMPLAINT filed herein, to sue robed

gavel tyrants and honor jurisprudence in The World Court’s high esteem; eg,

. . The King could do no wrong, which is a tyrannical and anti-freedom concept that
today manifests itself in the principle of governmental immunity. Further, one principle of the
common law was that an individual could defame the king and his ministers merely by stating
something bad about them; the truth was not a defense.

. .The legal principles of real property as well as some of the other fields of law which
we have today arise from the gradual and evolutionary erosion of feudalism. That which
happened over a period of several hundred years was the slow development of freedom and
rights to property extracted begrudgingly from absolute monarchs, who incidentally
considered themselves as possessing a degree of divinity.

. . For the past hundred or more years Congress has been busy writing all sorts of
laws for which we gave no permission. The worse period for illegal and bad laws was during
the period of the 1930's. This was when the exercise of control over the American people
went wild. This is one reason why the purpose of the jury is so important today.

. . The people who work for the government have a job as a result of our Constitution.
If it were not that we agreed to government, their positions would not exist. There is no other
way to look at it. It is our right and our duty to check on what they are doing. This of course
includes the laws they are passing. And what do we check them against?

• The supremacy clause holds the key. If they do not conform, they are no
good — they are not laws. Can't make it any plainer.

. . Our Fifth Amendment guarantees you and I due process of law. This is an
extremely important statement. Cannot take life, liberty, or property unless this
requirement for due process is followed. Our basic law holds the precedence. If the
government does not obey a command of the document, anything that comes as a result
does NOT follow due process.

. . Nevertheless, the purpose of the jury is to safeguard other citizens from an

overzealous government. You should know where to look to see if they have the authority to
pass the law under which they are accusing the person on trial. . . There are only four
crimes listed in our Constitution. These are:

• Counterfeiting of securities and current coins (Art I, Sec 8)

• Piracies and felonies committed on the high seas (Art I, Sec 8)
• Treason against the United States (Art III, Sec 3)
• Offenses against the law of nations (Art I, Sec 8)
Page 2 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY
 . . That's it! We gave NO power to Congress beyond these four to define a crime.
Sounds weird ... but it's true. . . In 1821, Chief Justice John Marshall, of the United
States Supreme Court stated in an opinion: Congress has a right to punish murder in a fort,
or other place within its exclusive jurisdiction; but no general right to punish murder
committed within any of the States. Further, he added, It is clear, that Congress cannot
punish felonies generally; Cohen v Virginia, 4 Wheat (US) 264 (1821). Unless you are a
juror in a case (federal) charging someone with a violation of one of the four listed crimes,
there is no criminal law. And you cannot judge the persons' innocence or guilt. You have no
right to convict.1

I. I, Roberta Kelly, Plaintiff claim federal jurisdiction pursuant to Article III § 2 which extends

the jurisdiction to cases arising under the U.S. Constitution.

II. Plaintiff brings this action against those whom are LICENSED practitioners of the rule of law

in the capacity as Federal Judges in the United States District Courts, in the Districts of but not limited

to: Oregon, the Division of Portland. Location primarily for the Complaint is attached to the Federal

Building where the art forms of high cost [etchings, granite, and sculpture garden, 9TH floor as well the

secured sixteenth floor] and dedicated to William Jefferson Clinton at 1000 S.W. Third Ave. Portland,

Oregon 97204; also as follows, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit located in San

Francisco, California: GARR M. KING, Oregon State Bar Licence Number 630432; BETTY B.

FLETCHER, Washington State Bar License Number 31; STEPHEN REINHARDT, California State

Bar License Number 28761; N. RANDY SMITH, Brigham Young Law School an Idaho and/or an

Appeal Judge, federal judicial officers, pursuant to Title 28 U.S. Code § 1331, in claims arising from

violations of federal constitutional rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution and redressable pursuant

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Narcotics Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

III. Plaintiff is a natural person residing at 5109 N.E. Ainsworth Street, Portland, Oregon 97218-

1826, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon.

IV. Defendants are all Judges presiding as noticed in this Complaint.

Grant Award No. SJI-96-02B-B-159; The National Center for State Courts 1999.
Page 3 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY
 STATEMENT OF THIS CASE

Title 42 U.S. Code § 1983 reads as follows: for violations of certain protections guaranteed by

the First, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments, ET AL. of the federal Constitution, by the

defendant under color of law in his/her capacity as a judge in the Court(s).

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any

State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person

within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the

Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other

proper proceeding for redress.

Judges, Defendants engaged in an egregious discrimination against Plaintiff, and denied me

my rights as a U.S. people, person, citizen and a minority as well as a senior, therefore, a claim of

denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Defendants judged in deprivation of property without due process, violating the Fifth

Amendment as well as the Fourteenth Amendment.

Judges are in violation of the first ten amendments of the Bill of Rights which are self

explanatory. Violations of these rights give rise to causes of action, under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and

in Bivens actions.

Violations in the Constitutional Amendments and The Bill of Rights:

• Linda Meng, Chair Affirmative Action;

• City Attorney in a complaint filed by Robert Seaver;
• Three to four years, Nazi Cult cover-up, Portland, Multnomah County;
• Police Chief Kruger.

Furthermore, Oregon State Bar attorneys ALL commingle, eg LINDA MENG et al. Therefore, the

genuine scholars in The U.S. Constitution and The Bill of Rights, ALL Articles-Amendments, please

find the wherewithal to INDICT Judges: Treason against the United States (Art III, Sec 3)

Page 4 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY
 PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore Plaintiff prays this Court issue equitable relief as follows: Justice in the rule of law

returning for the practice of due process to prevail! Injunctions-issue, See Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S.

522 (1983);

• injunctive relief;
• declaratory relief;
• issue other relief as this Court deems appropriate and just;
• award plaintiff costs of litigation.

Respectfully the 26TH day of April, 2011.

Roberta Kelly

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

F[415]355.8901; EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINTH CIRCUIT [REAPPOINTMENTS]

F[503]986.5730; Oregon Supreme Court, 1163 State ST, Salem OR 97301

Oregon State Bar [OSB#]
T[503]986.5709, Paul J. De Muniz #750969, email@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5725, Robert D. Durham #750969, robert.d.durham@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5717, Thomas A. Balmer #821855, thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5713, Rives Kistler #840600, rives.kistler@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5668, Martha L. Walters #773157, martha.l.walters@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5701, Virginia L. Linder #802943, email@ojd.state.or.us;
T[503]986.5674, Jack L. Landau #821554, jack.l.landau@ojd.state.or.us;

F[202]225.3974
U.S. 112TH Congress, et al. attn: United States Representatives
RE: House Committee on Oversight and Darrell Issa Elijah E. Cummins
Government Reform http://oversight.house.gov Chair Ranking Member
2157 Rayburn House Office Building [2347] HOB [2235] HOB
T[202]225.5074 T202.225.3906 T202.225.4741
Washington DC 20515 [F][202]225.3303 [F][202]225.3178

F[401]222.3599, RHODE ISLAND FAX [thank you] delivery to U.S. Supreme Court,
1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543; John G. Roberts Jr.; Antonin Scalia; Anthony M. Kennedy;
Clarence Thomas; Ruth B. Ginsburg; Stephen G. Breyer; Samuel A. Alito, Jr.; Sonia Sotomayor; Elena
Kagan.

Page 5 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY
Strategic Plan September 14, 2010, Judicial Conference Executive Committee
F[617]748.4990, Gary H Wente, 1 Courthouse Way #3700, Boston MA 02210;
F[215]204.5862, T[204.7308, Anthony J. Scirica; and David B. Sentelle; Joseph F. Bataillon; Charles
R. Breyer; Robert C. Broomfield; Julie E. Carnes; Rosemary M. Collyer; Michael W. Dobbins; James
C. Duff; Julia Smith Gibbons; Barbara M.G. Lynn; Paul Redmond Michel; Lawrence L. Piersol;
Michael A Ponsor; Julie A. Robinson; George Z Singal; Toby D Slawsky; John R Tunheim.

See also certified mail numbered.

[t.b.c. . . . ]

Page 6 - 10-36111: 04.26.11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT NO. [09-1125-KI] ROBERTA KELLY