Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Pointer
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t922523062
To cite this Article Evans, Susan S. and Evans, William H.(1987) 'Behavior Change and the Ecological Model', The Pointer,
31: 3, 9 — 12
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/05544246.1987.9944744
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/05544246.1987.9944744
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
H istorically, many behavior prob-
lems were believed to be symp-
tomatic of an underlying problem that
resided within the student. As a result,
the student became the focus of inter-
ventions designed to change hidher
thoughts, feelings, or values. Little con-
sideration was given to the effect of the
environment, the behavior of others on
problem behavior, or the interaction
between behavior and environment.
Behavior Change and More recently, however, there has
been an increased recognition that be-
Environmental Variables
At their most basic level, assessment
and behavior management plans focus
on behavior. Behavior, however, affects
and is affected by the environment. It
is this interaction that becomes the
focus for ecological interventions. To
examine this interaction, it is first
necessary to operationally define the
behavior and environmental variables
by precisely describing the setting and
behavior of interest. This description
Susan S. Evans is an assistant professor in the Department of Behavioral should clearly detail the effect of be-
Sciences at Pensacola Junior College in Pensacola, Florida. William H. havior and how the behavior differs
Evans is an associate professor in the Department of Special Education at from what is expected, tolerated, or
the University of West Florida in Pensacola. desired. Once this is accomplished, the
Vol. 31, No. 3 THEPOINTER 9
tent relationships between a particular
student’s environment and the occur-
rence or nonoccurrence of certain be-
haviors. The setting should be exam-
ined to determine if an intervention
would be appropriate and if so, which
Biophysical Physical part of the environment it should be
Environment Environment
designed to affect. Any associated in-
terventions will center on changing
some element of the environment. This
will occur in a particular setting, and
the effect will be evaluated by changes
in the targeted behavior. Assessment
should not end at this point, however,
but rather should be used to guide and
direct the implementation and altera-
tion of interventions.
The next section of this article pre-
sents an array of variables that must be
assessed in the biophysical, physical,
and psychosocial environments. These
t variables will combine in ways that are
unique to each setting and behavior
Downloaded At: 14:21 20 April 2011
Variables in the
Biophysical En vironmen t
posed by a peer group and the desire to ronmental variables in particular set-
zine, Schmid and Mercer (1981) and
receive the attention of peers are pow- tings. This type of analysis increases the
Evans, Evans, and Mercer (1986) state
erful forces that can greatly affect likelihood that any interventions will be
that the inappropriateness of behavior
behavior. appropriate and effective, and will fully
is a function not only of the behavior,
meet the needs of all involved.
but also of who performs the behavior,
Behavior with whom it occurs, who evaluates it,
A great deal of care should be taken and the setting in which the behavior REFERENCES
in specifically defining the behavior of occurs. Reports of behavior problems
interest. Vague terms such as “hyper- Algozzine, R., Schmid, R., & Mercer, C. (1981).
should provide a specific description of
Childhood behavior disorders. Rockville, MD:
active” or “unhappy” may refer to a why the behavior is inappropriate. It
Aspen Systems Corporation.
wide range of behaviors. As a result, may be obvious why some extremely Evans, W., Evans, S., & Mercer, C. (1986).
these imprecise terms do not clearly Assessment for instruction. Boston: Allyn and
severe behavior such as self-mutilation
Bacon.
communicate to others the specific be- and assaultive behaviors represent a
Evans, W., Evans, S., & Schmid, R. (in press).
havior of interest. Precise descriptions problem. Many other behaviors are Behavior and instructional management.
necessitate that behaviors be directly problems, however, simply because Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J . E. (1987). Looking in
observable, measurable, and operation- they are bothersome. classrooms. New York: Harper and Row.
ally defined by providing concrete ex- Careful consideration should beGoodman, L. (1985). The effective schools
amples of the behavior (e.g., Johnny hit movement and special education. Teaching Ex-
given before selecting a behavior as a
ceptional Children, I7(2), 102-105.
Mike five times during math period). target for an intervention. A behavior
Greenwood, C. R . , Delquardi, J . C . , & Hall, R .
Behaviors differ according to several that is at variance from what is ex-V. (1983). Opportunities to respond and stu-
dimensional qualities including: (a) pected provides an indication that adent academic performance. In W . L. Hew-
ard, D. Heron, & J . Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus
rate-the number of occurrences in a problem exists in the environment. on behavior analysii in education (pp. 58-88).
specific period of time, (b) duration- Only with assessment data can the ex-
Columbus, OH: Merrill.
the length of time of the occurrence of Ornstein, A . C. (1983). Do teachers make a dif-
act nature of the problem be identified.
ference? Childhood Education, 6(8), 342-349.
the behavior, (c) latency-the time be- Once identified, intervention can be
Paine, S., Radicchi, J., Rosellini, L., Deutch-
tween being asked to perform a re- applied at the appropriate point in the
man, L., & Darch, C. (1983). Structuringyour
sponse and responding, (d) topography classroom for academic success. Champaign,
environment, thus increasing the prob-
IL: Research Press.
-the physical form or shape of the be- ability that the intervention will be ap-
Smith, R . , Neisworth, J . , & Greer, J. (1978).
havior, and (e) magnitude-the force propriate and meet the needs of the Evaluating educational environments. Colum-
of the behavior. Behavior may be student, teacher, and parents. bus, OH: Merrill.
Werry, J. S. (1979). Organic factors. In H. C.
measured and changed according to Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathologi-
these dimensions. Conclusion cal diiorders of childhood (2nd ed.). New
Behaviors also differ in the effect York: Wiley.
Zentall, S. S. (1983). Learning environments: A
they have on the environment. A par- Few would argue with the primary review of physical and temporal factors. Ex-
ticular behavior may be well received assumptions of the ecological approach ceptional Educotion Quarterly, 4(2), 90-1 15.