You are on page 1of 4

Technical

Paper

Trihalomethanes (THM) Precursor Reduction of


Surface Water by EDR Technology
Abrera Drinking Water Treatment Plant, Barcelona Spain
Challenge The original treatment plant was first built in 1980,
and it consists of oxidation by potassium perman-
Elevated levels of salinity in the Llobregat River area
ganate, flocculation/sedimentation, chlorine dioxide
result of naturally-occurring calcium sulfate,
oxidation, sand filtration, granular activated carbon,
sodium chloride and potassium chloride deposits in
and post treatment chlorination.
the river basin geology. Tailings for the potash
mining industry are also found in the Llobregat However, these processes did not reduce the dis-
River. Both of these sources contribute to the ele- solved solids like bromide and the naturally occur-
vated levels of undesirable salt (Na, K, Cl and Br.) ring organic matter responsible for the THM
formation potential. As a result, THMs were created
The drinking water treatment plant in Abrera, Spain,
in excess of the allowable drinking water standards.
which serves the greater Barcelona area (about 4.5
These individual THMs of concern at this plant are:
million people), is owned by Aigües del Ter-
CHBr3, CHBr2Cl, CHBrCl2 and CHCL3.
Llobregat (ATLL), a public company as part of the
Regional Government of Catalonia. The bromide In addition, ATLL goal was to improve the global
levels along with the dissolved organic matter water quality of the Llobregat River to similar values
create a precursor for chlorination disinfection by- of the Ter River, the main water source in the met-
products, called trihalomethanes (THMs). THMs have ropolitan area.
been shown to be carcinogenic, and need to be
reduced so the water from the ATLL plant meets Developing a Solution
Spanish drinking water standard RD 140/2003,
where the THM limit is currently 100 µg/L at the end A solution was needed to reduce the THM potential
of pipe use. while being compatible with the current treatment
scheme. The lack of rainfall, the continued growing
Attempts were made by ATLL to reduce the THM demand for water, and implementation of Spanish
formation during treatment and distribution by drinking water regulation RD 140 led to the pursuit
reducing the chlorine addition at the plant. This was of a treatment strategy that both met the quality
successful within the plant, but as chlorine was goals, but also high water treatment efficiency. In
added through the regional distribution system, this addition, the THM solution must deal with the qual-
additional chlorine and the contact time created ity and quality of the existing treatment works.
THMs that were above the acceptable level.
Initially, electrodialysis reversal (EDR) and reverse
Since THMs themselves are very difficult to remove, osmosis (RO) were considered to be possible solu-
the idea at ATLL was to reduce the precursors like tions. It was determined that a pilot program was
bromide and the organic matter prior to chlorina- required to validate the projected THM precursor
tion. removal, understand the compatibility existing
works effluent with these solutions, and use real

Find a contact near you by visiting www.ge.com/water and clicking on “Contact Us”.
* Trademark of General Electric Company; may be registered in one or more countries.
©2010, General Electric Company. All rights reserved.

TP1179EN Mar-10
data to design a plant that effectively and efficiently The GE EDR pilot performed well with a length of 28-
met the water quality. month demonstration.
Pilot Plant The biggest problem with THMs formation occurs in
the summer months where the development of
The largest unknowns in the THM precursor solution THMs happens faster at warmer water tempera-
were: Will the solution remove the THM precursors? tures. This formation happens somewhat upon ini-
Will the solution be compatible with the water from tial chlorination, but also as the finished water flows
the existing works? The purpose of the pilot plant through the distribution network.
was to provide a means of generating performance
data to both select and optimize the design of a Fortunately, EDR removal efficiency is also greater
solution. Table 1 shows the river source water char- on warmer waters, compensating for the higher
acteristics. THM formation potential of this water in the sum-
mer. The EDR pilot showed that the THM formation
Table 1: Llobregat River Facts potential (THM-FP) before the EDR was 160+ / -40
µg/L, and after the EDR it was 64+ / -16 µg/L.
Characteristic Amount
Conductivity range: 500 to 2,500 µS/cm The GE EDR pilot validated that:
Bromide 0.5 – 1.2 mg/L • The GE EDR removed a sufficient amount of the
Chloride 150 – 1,300 mg/L THM precursors, so the treated river water was
below the THM limit.
Ba
30 – 190 µg/L
• No additional pretreatment to EDR was required
Sr on the existing works effluent.
1,100 – 2,200 µg/L
TOC • The EDR met its performance measurements
> 5.0 mg/L
even during seasonal variations in river water
salinity and temperature.
Both reverse osmosis and electrodialysis reversal
were piloted, starting in 1999. The EDR pilot pro- • The GE EDR pilot demonstrated conditions of a
gram, initiated in April 2004, tracked performance 90 percent water recovery plant.
of the EDR unit as variations in bromide, organic
matter, salinity, and temperature were experienced. • EDR had lower remineralization and power
costs than RO.
The RO pilot lasted six months, and during this time,
the following challenges were observed: The pilot was also an opportunity to provide a large
amount of data to optimize the design of a full-
• The RO water recovery rate was lower than scale plant. Experiments included comparing re-
desirable due to the high levels of scaling min- sults of single versus double stage EDR design,
erals like sulfates, barium, calcium and alumina temperature variation, flow variation and electrical
power optimization.
• Biological fouling was also a challenge to the
RO membranes and chlorine could not be used The GE EDR uses a Polarity Reversal feature to
on RO membranes prevent the accumulation of organic and inorganic
foulants and scale. In addition, the GE EDR mem-
• The turbidity and SDI resulting from the existing branes are compatible with a free chlorine residual,
pretreatment was too high and variable for an so cleaning the EDR with a solution with free chlo-
RO system and frequent cleanings were rine is an element of flexibility that effectively and
required. inexpensively reduces organic foulants. These fea-
tures contribute to long membrane life, low mainte-
• The variability in the river quality, including sa-
nance costs and high reliability even on this
linity, turbidity, and chemical pollution was chal-
challenging water under dynamic conditions.
lenging to adapt the RO operations without any
additional pretreatment after the existing plant,
like ultrafiltration (UF).
Page 2 TP1179EN Mar-10
2.3 m3/s
Max 4 m3/s Chlorine dioxide Main flow Chlorine

Llobregat SAND GAC EDR REM 263,000m3


DEC
River FILTER FILTER

KMnO4 Flocculant 1.7 m3/s Chlorine


Coagulant Complementary flow
Figure 1: Treatment diagram

Integration of a Solution
Based on favorable piloting results, the GE EDR
technology was selected as the THM precursor
reduction solution. The project, consisting of EDR
and other plant upgrades, cost 61 million Euros, and
has a capacity of 200,000 m3 per day. The EDR
plant, consisting of nine EDR units, began the com-
missioning in February 2008. It took about one year,
as the existing plant works had to deliver water to
the population. This facility is currently the largest
EDR plant in the world, and one of the largest
brackish water desalination plants of any technol-
ogy type. Due to the water scarcity condition in
Spain, the plant is designed to operate at 90% wa-
ter recovery. (See Figure 1.)
Figure 2: GE EDR Mark 4-2 Cell Pair
Effluent from the existing carbon filters is sent to a
3,000 m3 feed tank, and 9+3 EDR feed pumps pres-
surize the water and transport it from the tank,
through the cartridge filters (2 per EDR unit, having
270 cartridges at 5 micron nominal rating) and 576
GE EDR Mark 4-2 membrane stacks, 64 per unit
(Figures 2 and 3). The stacks are energized with DC
power using DC drive technology that is enclosed in
a group of electrical cabinets in the electrical room.
The membrane stacks are composed of 600 cell
pairs, each consisting of:

• Cation exchange membrane

• Flow spacer

• Anion exchange membrane

• Flow spacer

Figure 3: GE EDR Mark 4-2 Membrane Stack

TP1179EN Mar-10 Page 3


The membranes are homogeneous in composition References:
for low electrical resistance. The flow spacers,
which govern the flow of the water across the 1. Fernando Valero, Juan C. García, Santiago Gon-
membrane surface, consist of a screen mesh mate- zález, MªEugenia Medina, Juan Carlos de Armas,
rial to induce turbulence. The two electrodes in Manuel Hernández, José J. Rodríguez, “Control
each membrane stack are platinum coated tita- of THMs at the Llobregat DWTP (NE, Spain) using
nium for long life and the need to operate as both a Electrodialisys Reversal (EDR)”, International De-
cathode and an anode during normal operation. salination Association, October 2007.

Each of the nine EDR hydraulic skids also has 1+1 2. Mario Ferrer Arasa, Fernando Valero Cervera,
redundancy concentrate recirculation pumps. The Domingo Zarzo Martínez, Xavier Vives Rifé,
concentrate water from each of the EDR units is “Abrera (Barcelona, Spain) Drinking WTP Up-
collected and sent via pipeline to the Mediterranean grade through Electrodialysis Reversal (200,000
at the mouth of the Llobregat River, 30 kilometers m3/day)”, International Desalination Associa-
(18.6 miles) away from the plant. tion, October 2007.
3. Mario Ferrer Arasa, Domingo Zarzo Martínez,
Raúl Lemes, “Startup and Operation of The
World’s largest EDR water Treatment Plant”, In-
ternational Desalination Association, November
2009.
4. Fernando Valero, Ramón Arbós. “Desalination of
brackish river water using Electrodialysis Rever-
sal (EDR). Control of the THMs formation in the
Barcelona (NE Spain) area”. Elsevier, 2009.

Figure 4: 200,000 m3/day GE EDR at ATLL site

Each EDR hydraulic skid has provisions for scale


control using antiscalant and hydrochloric acid, and
a clean in place system, which can use sodium hy-
pochlorite, salt solution or hydrochloric acid as,
needed.
Post treatment of the EDR effluent consists of a
remineralization step to meet Spanish regulation RD
140/2003 for stabilization and corrosion potential in
transmission pipes. This will be used when required
and is accomplished using lime and CO2 addition to
increase the Langelier Saturation Index of the water
prior to distribution.
Consolidated text prepared by William Harvey and
Juan Carlos de Armas.

Page 4 TP1179EN Mar-10

You might also like