Professional Documents
Culture Documents
worldwide and
describe its infection cycle. (b) Discuss the potential impact of the disease and the factors
influencing its’ spread in New Zealand. (c) Review the methods that might be employed to
control or eliminate the disease.
Introduction
The genus Phytophthora contains a diverse group of Oomycetes with plant pathogenic
properties, which may reproduce asexually or sexually, and can overwinter by feeding
saprophytically on dead plant matter. Though the host range for each individual Phytophthora
species is fairly narrow, the diversity of the genus means that many different plant species are
susceptible, including many economically important food or production crops around the world. The
diversity of symptoms has serious implications for control efforts, as it is often difficult to diagnose
the presence of the Phytophthora pathogen based on the symptoms, as these may be indicative of
other pathogens or mineral toxicity, which makes it difficult to estimate the size of infected areas. In
New Zealand, Phytophthora is a notable pathogen in native forest, including South Island
Nothofagus forests, and has a significant impact on many endemic tree species, causing diebacks
which could have negative consequences for both conservation and reforestation efforts, as well as
Oomycetes is a class of Eukaryota which contains some of the most arrant pathogens of plants,
including the genus Phytophthora, which accommodates many species of plant pathogen. Symptoms
are varied, but may include root rot, blackening of root apical meristems, root galls, leaf wilting,
bleeding stem galls, and crown galls. Since the genus Phytophthora comprehends so many different
species, the variety of plants which are susceptible to the diseases caused by Phytophthora is also
quite diverse. Amongst the most susceptible are members of the Ericaceae family, some perennials,
such as S. tuberosum, and in New Zealand native forest, seedlings of Nothofagus species which do
Infection cycle
As mentioned earlier, Phytophthora species can be difficult to detect as a plant pathogen, which
is both due to the variety of symptoms that may (or may not) manifest, and to the infection cycle of
members of the Phytophthora genus, which in some cases requires specialized detection methods.
chlamydospores, which are much hardier than the mycelia and sporangia that develop once the
chlamydospores germinate. Once the sporangia are fully developed, they release zoospores, which
are motile in water. These disperse and infect the root of the target species just behind the root tip.
Further hyphae, which develop into mycelia, grow in the root and absorb nutrients. This rots the
root, rendering it useless to the plant, which can no longer absorb water or pabulum from the soil.
Globally, the genus Phytophthora causes enormous damage, both ecologically and
and mortality rates of up to 5 trees per hectare in Bavarian oaks. Corks were found to be significantly
affected by rapid decline caused by Phytophthora in Spain, Portugal and Iberia, which would be
associated with economic hardships relating to loss of raw materials. In the United States, California
and Oregon were faced with significant oak diebacks, while the Irish potato famine of 1845, caused
by late potato blight, a disease caused by the Phytophthora organism is another example of
In New Zealand, the potential for devastation is increased by the large number of endemic tree
species. Many New Zealand native species face the problem of having evolved in isolation and
relative safety, and without the selection pressures required to force adaptations to pathogens,
these adaptations do not exist, which in some cases leaves our endemic species vulnerable to
diebacks, crown thinning, water and nutrient stress, and eventually mortality. One species which is
particularly susceptible is Agathis australis, the New Zealand Kauri. Phytophthora taxon Agathis is
thought to be a non-native pathogen, which can cause crown transparency, yellowing leaves, collar
Economic losses may also be incurred from the presence of the various Phytophthora species in
New Zealand. The economy currently relies heavily on exports of our farmed produce; in 2005
export earnings of fresh New Zealand potatoes to the Philippines alone was $100,000 and by 2009,
this figure was closer to 1 million. Late potato blight, caused by a species of Phytophthora, has the
potential to impact heavily on these figures and reduce the income of the country as a whole,
especially when other relevant export crops are taken into account. Another aspect of our export
industry is prestige boutique wines. Vineyards are fairly susceptible to the spread of Phytophthora as
V. vinifera is often planted in rows with roots or leaves overlapping to maximize space. With the
wine export industry in New Zealand being worth just over 1 billion, a situation like that which
occurred in South Africa, with Phytophthora cinamomi becoming one of the major causes of root rot
in commercially grown grapes, could have a devastating impact on the already fragile economy. This
could lead to serious implications for our budget and subsequent Government spending.
Phytophthora disease spread dynamics
Phytophthora species spread best in warm, wet conditions, where the soil is disturbed
frequently and is heavier, with inadequate drainage. Human and animal activity may also contribute
to the spread of this oomycete. Tourism in New Zealand is a significant risk factor, as visitors may not
realise the importance of sterilising camping gear and foot wear when moving to a new area.
Phytophthora is able to travel through the water in the soil, dispersing to new uninfected root stock.
This means it frequently travels downhill, as it goes with the water to low lying areas.
Chemical controls
Methods of chemical Phytophthora control currently center around . Pinus radiata grown in
nurseries without micorrhizal association are treated chemically with phenylamides including
infestations and the associated root rots caused by these. Application of phosphonate has also
proven to be effective as it can activate natural host resistances while simultaneously acting against
the disease causing agent. These are just a few examples of some chemical controls which have
been used with success, of which there are many more, with the probability of more being
discovered in the future. With chemical controls of Phytophthora spp., the drawback is that natural
and beneficial mycorrhizal associations between plants and fungi may be disrupted. While these
methods are very effective at controlling Phytophthora in the nurseries where they have so far been
implemented, the similarity of the Phytophthora genus’ physiology with the true fungi means that
many non-targeted species will also be affected by these chemical control methods if they were
Physical controls