Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scientific Documentation
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 2 of 24
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 3
1.1 Origins of post anchors 3
1.2 Purpose of the root canal post 3
5. Material investigations 12
5.1 Flexural strength of various root canal posts 12
5.2 Influence of the surface texture on the bond strength between the post and core build-up 13
5.3 Increasing the strength of the bond between the post and core build-up material 14
5.4 Examinations of different types of bond between post and core build-up 15
5.5 Cyclical loading of several root canal post systems 15
5.6 Comparison of several post build-up systems 16
5.7 Mechanical strength of zirconium oxide root canal posts 17
6. Clinical investigations 19
6.1 Studies conducted on the CosmoPost and IPS Empress Cosmo ingot 19
6.2 Studies conducted on ZrO2-TZP-posts 21
7. Biocompatibility 22
7.1 Biocompatibility of zirconium-TZP-ceramics (CosmoPost) 22
7.2 Radioactivity of CosmoPost and IPS Empress Post ingot 22
8. Literature 23
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 3 of 24
1. Introduction
The first post anchors in the root canal were fabricated at the beginning of the 20th century. They
were called pivot teeth. Since it was discovered that the post exerts pressure on the root canal walls,
the root stump was stabilized with a gold ring to prevent the root from fracturing. In newer root canal
post systems, the pressure is absorbed by the core build-up, thus reducing the risk of fractures.
A root canal post is used if teeth are severely damaged and devitalized. It has to provide adequate
retention for the build-up.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 4 of 24
Materials
As a result of certain aspects of materials science and fabrication, metal-based posts and build-up-
materials were (and sometimes still are) preferred. The materials used range from cobalt-chromium
to nickel-chromium, and to precious metal alloys, such as gold-platinum or silver-palladium. Today,
however, titanium and platinum are the most commonly used materials (Meyenberg et al., 1995).
Procedures
Individual or semi-finished posts or screws are available. For both procedures, the build-ups may be
fabricated either directly with mouldable materials in the oral cavity of the patients or indirectly in the
dental laboratory by means of the casting technique after having taken an impression of the prepared
tooth structure (Simon and Paffrath, 1995).
Cementation may be carried out adhesively or conventionally. Adhesive cementation increases the
strength of the system comprising the post, build-up, and dentin (Mendoza and Eakle, 1994).
Assessment
Questions with regard to biocompatibility and aesthetics have led to critical assessments of metal-
based post systems. With all-ceramic crowns in particular, the use of metal posts is aesthetically
unsatisfactory, since the metal core often shines through the translucent, all-ceramic crown. This dark
bluish tinge is caused when the light penetrates through the translucent gingiva and the tooth structure
or crown and is reflected by the opaque post and/or core build-up material (Simon and Paffrath,
1995). The corrosion of the post and the build-up represents the main problem of such restorations,
particularly if non-precious metals are used (Wirz and Christ 1982; Koutayas and Kern, 1999).
Corrosion results in the accumulation of decomposition products in the dental and periodontal
tissues, thus resulting in discolouration and inflammation of the gingiva. In this respect, it must be
noted that different types of metal alloys also demonstrate different corrosion behaviour (e.g.
corrosion resistance of titanium).
The demand for highly aesthetic and biocompatible products led to the development of tooth-
coloured, metal-free post build-up systems.
The translucent ceramic post allows the The metal post reflects most of the
light to penetrate and scatters it also in penetrating light
the direction of the gingiva
Fig. 1 Comparison of the light reflection of a ceramic and a metal root canal post (in accordance with Meyenberg,
1994)
Glass-ceramic systems
An impression is taken of the canal dimensions. After that the post build-up is fabricated of castable
glass-ceramics (e.g. Dicor) using the indirect method. However, the low strength of Dicor
considerably limits the range of indication (Paul and Schärer, 1996).
Physical properties:
SiO 2 54 - 59
ZrO2 15 - 19
Al2O3 3-7
P2O5 4-7
Li2O 7 - 10
Na2O 2-5
K2O 3-7
F 0.5 - 2
+ Pigments 0-2
Physical properties:
Type II ceramic
Flexural strength > 100 N/mm²
Chemical solubility < 2000 µg/cm2
Coefficient of thermal expansion (100°-500°) 9.5 ± 0.5 µm/(mŸK)
Transformation temperature 545 ± 10 °C
4.1 Material
CosmoPost
The prefabricated, cylindro-conical CosmoPosts are made of Zirconium oxide ceramic (ZrO 2-TZP1-
ceramic), which has been successfully used for medical appliances (hip replacements) for
approximately 10 years. The good compatibility, corrosion resistance, and excellent mechanical
strength (high flexural strength and fracture toughness) of the ZrO2-TZP-ceramic is particularly
valued (Luthardt and Musil, 1997). The high temperatures during production result in a high-quality
ceramic material, which is free of porosity.
IPS Empress Cosmo Ingot
A glass-ceramic containing zirconium oxide is used as the base material. Its expansion coefficient is
slightly lower than that of the ZrO2-TZP-ceramic. This adjustment of the expansion coefficient and
the high ZrO2 content of the IPS Empress Como Ingot ceramic [15-19 wt. %] permits an optimum
bond to the ZrO 2-TZP-ceramic of the CosmoPost (Schweiger et al., 1998a + b).
4.2 Procedure
The core build-up made of the IPS Empress Cosmo ingot is pressed onto the zirconium oxide root
canal post according to the familiar IPS Empress heat-pressing technique (Wohlwend and Schärer,
1990). If at least one-third of the natural tooth crown is still present, the core build-up may also be
fabricated of composite materials (e.g. Tetric Ceram). This approach offers the advantage of the root
canal post and core build-up being inserted during one single appointment.
1
Above 1170° C the monoclinic zirconium dioxide forms a tetragonal modification. The addition of Y2O3 permits
stabilizing the tetragonal modification until room temperature is reached. The result is a stabilized zirconium
dioxide with a grain size below 0.4 µm. It is called zirconia-TZP (Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystals)-ceramic
(Luthardt and Musil, 1997).
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 10 of 24
2
If purely light-curing resins are used, there is a risk of inadequate polymerization in the depth of the root canal.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 11 of 24
Fig. 2a: optimum bond between the glass- Fig. 2b: optimum bond between the glass
ceramic (core build-up) and the ZrO2-ceramic ceramic (core build-up) and the ZrO2-ceramic
(CosmoPost); polished surface at 2000-fold (CosmoPost); fracture surface at 5000-fold
magnification magnification
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 12 of 24
5. Material investigations
1200
1000
Flexural strength [MPa]
800
600
400
200
0
Dicor In-Ceram unalloyed steel Cerapost Cosmopost hard metal
Comparison of the flexural strength of various root canal post system; all data from Simon and Paffrath (1995)
except the flexural strength of CosmoPost: internal results Ivoclar AG, Schaan
Cerapost (Brasseler) is also made of ZrO2-TZP-ceramic
Conclusion: The flexural strength of the CosmoPost is very high and is between that of unalloyed
steel and tungsten carbide.
These results for the flexural strength of zirconium oxide root canal posts are confirmed by
investigations of McLaren and Sorensen (1997) who measured a 3-point flexural strength of 1110
MPa for zirconium oxide ceramic.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 13 of 24
5.2 Influence of the surface texture on the bond strength between the post and core
build-up
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface conditioning (the CosmoPosts were
either untreated or demonstrated a roughened surface) and thermocycling on the retention of the core
build-up material (IPS Empress Cosmo ingot) heat-pressed onto the CosmoPost. The bond strength
was measured in a push-out test in the Schenk testing machine.
350
300
250
Bond strength [N]
200
150
100
50
0
untreated rough surface after TC rough surface after TC
5.3 Increasing the strength of the bond between the post and core build-up material
with the IPS Empress heat-pressing procedure
The bonding strength between the CosmoPost and the IPS Empress Cosmo ingot ceramic was
tested. In the selected test procedure (Schenk testing machine), the posts were forced out of the
ceramic core build-up material at an advance rate of 5 mm/min. The first crack was recorded. A so-
called prototype, i.e. a zirconium oxide post adhesively bonded to the core build-up, was used as the
control group.
250
200
Bond strength [N]
150
100
50
0
Cosmopost Prototype Cosmopost, rough Prototype, rough
surface surface
CosmoPost: CosmoPost and Empress Cosmo ingot, bonded using the heat-pressing
technique.
Prototype: Post of the same material as the CosmoPost (cylindrical shape), adhesively
bonded with the ceramic core build-up material
Rough surface: The surface roughness [Ra] is 0.4 - 0.8 µm
Conclusion: The zirconium oxide posts bonded with the core build-up by means of the heat-
pressing technique demonstrated higher bonding strength than those bonded with an
adhesive. This increased bonding strength is particularly notable with untreated
zirconium oxide posts.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 15 of 24
5.4 Examinations of different types of bond between post and core build-up
Various types of bond between the post and core build-up were examined. Pressing, adhesive
cementation, and milling of the entire structure. The breaking load and the deflection at fracture were
measured and compared. The load was exerted perpendicular to the post axis.
load [N] resp. deflection [µm/N]
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
pressing adhesive milling
(Cosmopost/Empress) (Cosmopost/Empress) (one piece In-ceram zirc)
Jeong et al (2001)
Conclusion: The investigation shows that the adhesive cementation of the ceramic build-up onto
the ceramic post may be a true alternative to the conventional pressing technique.
The elastic bond between the rigid materials provides an additional advantage.
Metal and ceramic posts, as well as fibre-reinforced resin posts, were embedded in acrylic resin
blocks. After storage in H2O at 37° for 48 hours, the posts were subject to cyclical loading at a 45°
angle. The load was continuously increased by 25N until failure of the test sample.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 16 of 24
1600 140
1400 120
1200
100
1000
80
800
60
600
40
400
200 20
0 0
Titanium post Cosmopost Aesthetiplus Exp.Fiber Exp. Fiber
1.5 1.7 1.4 1.5 2.0
Conclusion: The ceramic posts withstood a higher load than the commercial fibre-reinforced resin
posts.
CosmoPost (1.7 mm) does not significantly differ from the 2 mm thick experimental
Fibre Post.
Various combinations of root canal post and core build-up materials (upper incisors) were subject to
thermocycling (1.2 m. cycles, 5°/55°C). The survival rates and the fracture loads were determined.
Examined combinations: titanium/composite, zirconium oxide (Cerapost)/composite, zirconium oxide
(Cerapost)/ceramic (Empress Cosmo), gold/gold.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 17 of 24
100 450
400
Butz et al (2001)
Conclusion: The survival rate and fracture load values were comparable, except those for the
zirconium oxide/composite combination.
The zirconium oxide/ceramic combination showed a survival rate of 100 % in the
thermocycling test. These findings were also confirmed by the investigations of Strub
et.al (2000) and Heydecke et al (2002).
Differently conditioned CosmoPosts of both sizes were examined with the help of a 3-point bending
test. The influence of the following treatments were determined: a) Influence of silicatization on the
surface (Rocatec procedure) and b) Influence of heat exposure during the application of the pressed
ceramic.
2500 20
Weibull strength [MPa]
18
Weibul modulus m
2000 16
14
1500 12 Weibull strength
10
1000 8 Weibull modulus
6
500 4
2
0 0
1.7 silicat.
1.4 silicat.
untreated
untreated
heat treat.
heat treat.
1.7
1.4
1.7
1.4
The flexural strength values for ZrO2 found in the literature are lower. The 40 % higher values of the
present investigation may be attributed to the ‘size effect’ typical for ceramic materials. The strength
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 18 of 24
increase resulting from the silicatization (Rocatec procedure) is caused by the increase of the inherent
compressive strain in the surface layer of the posts, which may partially compensate the tensile strain
relevant for a failure.
Conclusion: The heat exposure during pressing does not influence the strength of the posts.
The silicatization increases the Weibull strength σ63.21%. However, it also increased
the scattering of the values.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 19 of 24
6. Clinical investigations
6.1 Studies conducted on the CosmoPost and IPS Empress Cosmo ingot
Experimental: The first post build-ups were seated in July 1998. The posts were
conventionally cemented (ProTec Cem, Ketac Cem). Until the end of
1999, 20 CosmoPosts were examined.
Results: After a mean observation period of 9.7 months (2-16 months) no failures in
the form of a post or tooth fracture were noted.
Smaller, clinically irrelevant delamination of the build-up material were
observed during removal of the temporary.
Publication: Nothdurft Frank Philipp: Werkstoffkundliche und klinische Untersuchungen
zu vollkeramischen Stiftaufbauten; internal report to Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Experimental: Forty anterior teeth with root canal fillings were restored with CosmoPosts
and Tetric Ceram build-ups. The crowns were fabricated of IPS Empress 2
and Allceram.
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 21 of 24
Results: The last recall examinations were completed at the end of 2002/beginning
of 2003. Up until now, the results are outstanding. No fractures, irritation of
the gingiva, etc. The aesthetic results are considered excellent for all cases.
Publication: Gerhards U, Gärtner J, Jöhren HP, Gängler P; Der Einfluss eines
keramischen Stiftsystems (CosmoPost) auf das kosmetische Ergebnis von
vollkeramischen Frontzahnkronen am Beispiel des Empress 2- und des All-
Ceram Systems; internal report to Ivoclar Vivadent AG
The ZrO2-TZP-post used in this study is a prototype of the CosmoPost and is made of the same
material as the CosmoPost, but it features a cylindrical shape (in contrast to the cylindro-conical
CosmoPost). Given this identical material composition, it can be assumed that the clinical results
achieved with the ZrO2-TZP-posts are also valid for the CosmoPost.
Head of study: Dr K.H. Meyenberg
Klinik für Kronen- und Brücken-Prothetik, Teilprothetik und zahnärztliche
Materialkunde, Zentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der
Universität Zürich (Switzerland)
Objective: Clinical evaluation of the ZrO2-TZP-posts
Experimental: Fifteen ZrO2-TZP-ceramic root canal posts were seated in 13 patients. Six
IPS Empress restorations, 6 In-Ceram restoration, 2 veneers, and 1 PFM
crown were fabricated. The core build-up was made of a hybrid composite
material.
Results: After an average of 11 months (6-27 months), the restorations were
checked for the first time. Up to this first recall, no failures were noted. All
restorations achieved and 'excellent' rating as far as aesthetics was
concerned.
Publication: Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer R, Zirconia Posts: A New All-Ceramic
Concept for Nonvital Abutment Teeth, J Esthet Dent 7 (1995) 73-80
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 22 of 24
7. Biocompatibility
The radioactivity of the ceramic powder in question was measured by means of γ-spectronomy. The
uranium and thorium activity was determined.
The above values show that the radioactivity of CosmoPost and IPS Empress Cosmo ingot is far
below the maximum values stipulate by ISO- 6872:1995/Amd.1:1997(E) (Dental ceramic) and ISO
13356.2 (Implants for surgery - Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-
TZP)).
Scientific Documentation CosmoPost / IPS Empress® Cosmo Ingot Page 23 of 24
8. Literature
dentaltechnologischen Bearbeitbarkeit von
Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR Zirkondioxid-Keramik
Survival rate and fracture strength of Swiss Dent 18 (1997) 10-14
endodontically treated maxillary incisors with
moderate defects restored with different post-and- Lüthy H, Schärer P, Gauckler L
core systems: an in vitro study New materials in dentisty: Zirconia posts. Abstr.
Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64 IV-2, Monte Verità Conference on Biocompatible
Materials Systems (BMS)
Fischer H, Edelhoff D, Marx R 11-14 Oktober 1993, Ascona, Schweiz
Mechanische Beanspruchbarkeit von Zirkonoxid-
Wurzelstiften McLaren EA and Sorensen JA
Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53 (1998) Flexural Strength of Ceramic Materials With
Different Treatments
Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR J Dent Res 76 (1997) 392
Fracture strength after dynamic loading of
endodontically treated teeth restored with Mendoza DB, Eakle WS
different post-and-core systems Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal
J Prosthet Dent 2002 Apr;87(4):438-45 bonding cements
J Prosthet Dent 72, (1994) 591
Jeong SM, Jeong JH, Kang DW, Ludwig K, Kern M
Evaluation of the fracture resistance of zirconia Meyenberg KH
posts in all-ceramic post and core restorations Dental Esthetics: A European Perspective
J Dent Res 80 (2001) 706 J Esthet Dent 6 (1994) 274 - 281
This documentation contains a survey of internal and external scientific data (“Information”). The documentation
and Information have been prepared exclusively for use in-house by Ivoclar Vivadent AG and for external Ivoclar
Vivadent partners. They are not intended to be used for any other purpose. While we believe the Information is
current, we have not reviewed all of the Information, and we cannot and do not guarantee its accuracy,
truthfulness, or reliability. We will not be liable for use of or reliance on any of the Information, even if we have
been advised to the contrary. In particular, use of the Information is at your sole risk. It is provided "as-is", "as
available" and without any warranty express or implied, including (without limitation) of merchantability or fitness
for a particular purpose.
The Information has been provided without cost to you and in no event will we or anyone associated with us be
liable to you or any other person for any incidental, direct, indirect, consequential, special, or punitive damage
(including, but not limited to, damage for lost data, loss of use, or any cost to procure substitute information)
arising out of your or another’s use of or inability to use the Information even if we or our agents know of the
possibility of such damage.
Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Research and Development
Scientific Service
Bendererstrasse 2
FL - 9494 Schaan
Liechtenstein
Content: Magdalena Wey / Petra Bühler-Zemp
Edition: November 2002