Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modeling in SI Engines
FREDRIK LINDSTRÖM
This licentiate thesis concerns the modeling of spark ignition engine combustion for
use in one dimensional simulation tools. Modeling of knock is of particular interest
when modeling turbocharged engines since knock usually limits the possible engine
output at high load. The knocking sound is an acoustic phenomenon with pressure
oscillations triggered by autoignition of the unburned charge ahead of the propagating
flame front and it is potentially damaging to the engine. To be able to predict knock it
is essential to predict the temperature and pressure in the unburned charge ahead of
the flame front. Hence, an adequate combustion model is needed.
The combustion model presented here is based on established correlations of
laminar burning velocity which are used to predict changes in combustion duration
relative to a base operating condition. Turbulence influence is captured in empirical
correlations to the engine operating parameters spark advance and engine speed. This
approach makes the combustion model predictive in terms of changes in gas
properties such as mixture strength, residual gas content, pressure and temperature.
However, a base operating condition and calibration of the turbulence correlations is
still needed when using this combustion model.
The empirical models presented in this thesis are based on extensive
measurements on a turbocharged four cylinder passenger car engine. The knock
model is simply a calibration of the Arrhenius type equation for ignition delay in the
widely used Livengood-Wu knock integral to the particular fuel and engine used in
this work.
Keywords: spark ignited engines, combustion modeling, knock, 1D simulation, Wiebe, divided
exhaust period
iii
SAMMANFATTNING
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Where am I to start this display of gratitude towards colleagues and friends? From the
beginning of course! It all started with Emil Åberg, who had the patience to guide me,
a complete novice in the world of engines and a stranger to essential skills such as
welding and soldering, into the fascinating interior of the DEP engine. With the aid of
Emil, I could eventually start discussing engines with Hans-Erik Ångström, who never
stops to evolve his wonderful engine laboratory. The software support department, i.e.
Hans-Erik, has been impeccable; we once clocked the time from failure detection in
the Cell4 system to installed and working program update to just over 12 minutes!
Christel Elmqvist-Möller put me right into the business of research, as she
gave me a good chunk of the knock model to bite into just weeks after my first close
encounter with SI engines. I would also like to thank Christel for excellent project
management throughout this entire project.
The mechanics Henrik Nilsson at KTH and Jon Nilsson at GM Powertrain
Sweden kept the engines running even though we did our best to kill them (the
engines of course) at times. I thank lab manager Eric Lycke especially for talking me
out of disassembling the gear box of my car. As always, there was a much more
straightforward solution to the problem…
Gautam Kalghatgi has contributed a lot to the work on combustion and
knock modeling. Thank you for many interesting discussions and insights and for
being such a joyful person. But who is there to talk about knock modeling when
Gautam has left the building? Per Risberg and Fredrik Agrell! Thank you also Fredrik
for having enough confidence in me to let me present your work in Rio.
All colleagues at KTH have made the time here very rewarding. Fredrik
Westin’s immense knowledge of racing engines; Andreas Cronhjort for sharing
knowledge in filtering and electronics; fellow sailor Fredrik Wåhlin; fellow musician
Per Strålin. Thank you Ulrica and Niklas for finally taking the burden of being the
department junior off my shoulders.
Some people at GM Powertrain Sweden have contributed with valuable
comments and support along the way, in particular Börje Grandin, Eric Olofsson,
Lennarth Zander and Raymond Reinmann. The link to GM Powertrain has made the
work meaningful to me.
v
And finally, thank you to friends and family, nieces and nephews, who
encouraged me every now and then along the way. I’ll let you in on a secret. It actually
started almost exactly 30 years ago on the outskirts of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fredrik Lindström
Brasilia, August 2005
vi
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
Paper I
Divided Exhaust Period – A Gas Exchange System for Turbocharged SI Engines by
Christel Elmqvist-Möller, Pontus Johansson, Börje Grandin and Fredrik Lindström.
SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1150 presented by Christel Elmqvist-Möller at the SAE
World Congress 2005 in Detroit, USA.
Paper II
Optimizing Engine Concepts by Using a Simple Model for Knock Prediction by
Christel Elmqvist-Möller, Fredrik Lindström, Hans-Erik Ångström, and Gautam
Kalghatgi. SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3123 presented by Christel Elmqvist-Möller
at the SAE Powertrain and Fluid Systems Conference 2003 in Pittsburg, USA.
Paper III
An Empirical SI Combustion Model Using Laminar Burning Velocity Correlations by
Fredrik Lindström, Hans-Erik Ångström, Gautam Kalghatgi and Christel
Elmqvist-Möller. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2106 presented by Fredrik Lindström
at the SAE Fuels & Lubricants Meeting 2005 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract ..............................................................................................................iii
Sammanfattning ................................................................................................. iv
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. v
List of publications ........................................................................................... vii
Abbreviations, symbols and subscripts............................................................... x
Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................1
1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................2
1.2 Contributions ...........................................................................................................3
1.3 Thesis outline ...........................................................................................................4
Chapter 2 Combustion in spark ignition engines......................................... 5
2.1 Gas Exchange ..........................................................................................................5
2.1.1 Residual gases ......................................................................................................6
2.1.2 Fuel........................................................................................................................6
2.1.3 Turbulence ...........................................................................................................6
2.2 Combustion ..............................................................................................................7
2.2.1 Laminar burning velocity...................................................................................7
2.2.2 Cycle to cycle variations.....................................................................................8
2.3 Knock ........................................................................................................................9
2.3.1 Autoignition chemistry.......................................................................................9
2.3.2 Modes of Autoignition.....................................................................................11
2.3.3 Combustion Chamber Oscillation Modes ....................................................12
2.3.4 Measures of Knock...........................................................................................14
2.4 Combustion simulation ........................................................................................14
2.4.1 The Wiebe Function.........................................................................................17
2.4.2 Knock Simulation .............................................................................................17
Chapter 3 Experimental Method ................................................................ 23
3.1 Measurements ........................................................................................................23
3.1.1 Measurement system ........................................................................................23
3.1.2 Pressure measurement......................................................................................24
3.1.3 Temperature measurement..............................................................................25
viii
3.1.4 Other measurements ........................................................................................27
3.2 Data Acquisition ....................................................................................................29
3.2.1 Signal Conditioning ..........................................................................................30
3.2.2 FIR Low Pass Filter..........................................................................................32
3.2.3 FIR Band Pass Filtering ...................................................................................35
3.2.4 IIR Filtering for Knock Onset Detection.....................................................35
3.3 Heat release calculation.........................................................................................36
3.3.1 Thermodynamic properties of mixture .........................................................37
3.4 Experiment engines...............................................................................................42
3.4.1 Divided Exhaust Period...................................................................................42
3.4.2 Engine specifications........................................................................................43
Chapter 4 Knock Modeling......................................................................... 45
4.1 Experiments ...........................................................................................................45
4.2 Data Evaluation .....................................................................................................46
4.3 Knock Model Calibration.....................................................................................47
4.4 Discussion...............................................................................................................49
Chapter 5 Combustion Modeling Using the Wiebe Function.....................51
5.1 Existing Wiebe models .........................................................................................51
5.1.1 Structure of Existing Models ..........................................................................52
5.1.2 Model Identification Procedure......................................................................53
5.1.3 Csallner ...............................................................................................................53
5.1.4 Witt......................................................................................................................55
5.2 Experiments ...........................................................................................................55
5.3 Data Evaluation .....................................................................................................59
5.3.1 Wiebe Parameter Identification ......................................................................60
5.4 Combustion model calibration ............................................................................62
5.4.1 Modeling Speed Influence ...............................................................................63
5.5 Results .....................................................................................................................64
Chapter 6 Conclusions ................................................................................ 65
6.1 Future work ............................................................................................................66
References ......................................................................................................... 69
ix
ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND SUBSCRIPTS
Abbreviations
SI Spark Ignition
HCCI Homogenous Charge Compression Ignition
PFI Port Fuel Injection
CA Crank Angle
TDC Top Dead Center
aTDC crank angles after combustion TDC
bTDC crank angles before combustion TDC
EVO Exhaust Valve Opening
IVC Inlet Valve Closing
IMEP Indicated Mean Effective Pressure, 720 CA
PMEP Pumping Mean Effective Pressure
EGR Exhaust Gas Recirculation
MBT Maximum Brake Torque spark timing
CFR Cooperative Fuels Research octane rating engine
RON Research Octane Number
MON Motor Octane Number
PRF Primary Reference Fuel, iso-octane/n-heptane blend
NTC Negative Temperature Coefficient
FIR Finite Impulse Response filter
IIR Infinite Impulse Response filter
FS Full Scale, in measurement system errors
A/D Analogue to Digital
Symbols
A scaling factor in ignition delay correlation and cylinder heat transfer area
Ai constant in AVL expression for temperature dependent cp/cv
a scaling factor in Wiebe function
B cylinder bore and temperature coefficient in ignition delay correlation
Bm, Bλ constants in laminar burning velocity correlations
c speed of sound
x
Cp , CV molar heat capacity at constant pressure / volume
cp, cV specific heat capacity at constant pressure / volume
Fi, Gi, Hi influencing functions in Wiebe correlation
fi, gi, hi normalized influencing functions in Wiebe correlation
fLP low pass filter cutoff frequency in Hz
fm,n,k combustion chamber natural frequencies
hc heat transfer coefficient in Woschni equation for heat transfer
Jm Bessel’s function of the first kind
Kf number of periods of sinc function in FIR-filter kernel
m combustion mode parameter in Wiebe function
M molar mass
N engine speed in rpm
n pressure exponent in ignition delay correlation
p pressure
pm motored pressure
PR pressure ratio
Qch chemical energy released from fuel
q0 , q1 normalized cutoff frequencies in filters
R universal gas constant, 8.314 kJ/molK
SL laminar burning velocity
Sp piston mean velocity
T gas temperature
Tu unburned zone temperature
V volume, cylinder volume
Vd displaced volume
xb mass fraction burned
~
xr burned gas mole fraction
xi
λ normalized air/fuel ratio
λm constant in laminar burning velocity correlations
θ crank angle and cylindrical angle coordinate
θ0 start of combustion aTDC
θd flame development period
∆θ total combustion duration
τ ignition delay time
Subscripts
EOC end of combustion ,ref
SOC start of combustion
b burned
exh exhaust
k longitudinal mode number
m circumferential mode number
n radial mode number
norm normalized
u unburned
0 and ref reference condition
xii
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
The internal combustion engine as we know it today was invented over a hundred
years ago by the likes of Otto and Diesel. Still today, however, there is progress and
improvements in the design and operation of internal combustion engines. One of the
key factors for the success of the internal combustion engine in the transport of
people is the reliability and flexibility as a mobile power source.
The focus for research and development has shifted over the years,
depending on trends and demand from society as a whole as well as on new enabling
technologies. From society, focus has shifted from reductions of the local emissions
towards the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, i.e. CO2 or the fuel efficiency.
Introduction of the three way catalyst and close loop fueling control basically solved
the problem of local emissions of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and
nitrogen oxides for spark ignited engines. Today, with the introduction of direct fuel
injection with stratified charge to improve part load fuel economy, emissions of
nitrous oxides are again coming into focus since the three way catalyst doesn’t work in
the overall fuel lean conditions. A rising concern today is the future availability of
energy resources suitable for transportation which also brings focus to renewable
energy sources and efficiency in using the available energy.
State of the art spark ignited engine of today can benefit from technologies
such as: variable valve timing, which can replace throttling and reduce part load gas
exchange losses and also maximize power output by improving volumetric efficiency;
fuel injection with feedback control to maximize after treatment system efficiency;
knock sensors for optimal combustion phasing; turbocharging which increases power
1
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
density and enables downsizing of the engine with less friction losses and improved
part load efficiency as a result. Evolution in the fields of electronics and sensors gives
new opportunities to optimize the operation of internal combustion engines.
Developments in auxiliary units such as water pumps and oil pumps reduce parasitic
losses. New manufacturing methods and materials reduce the weight of engines.
Electric hybrid systems enable recovery of breaking energy in the vehicle. Many more
examples exist of parts of the engine or vehicle where improvements are being made
today, all serving to improve fuel efficiency. However, the general trend in passenger
cars is that passenger safety and comfort requirements lead to an increased vehicle
weight with increased need for power and higher fuel consumption as a result.
Statistics from the European Union [1] shows that during the period 1995 to 2002 the
average vehicle weight increased by 10 %, average power by over 20 % while average
vehicle CO2 emissions decreased by 12,1 % in new vehicles. The average CO2
emissions per kilometer is lower for diesel powered vehicles than for the equivalent
gasoline powered vehicle owing to higher average efficiency of the diesel engine An
increasing share of diesel powered vehicles explains some of the improvements in
average CO2 emissions. The gasoline powered vehicles did however decrease average
CO2 emissions per kilometer by 9,1 % in the EU statistics mentioned above.
Today, the fuel cell is put forward as an alternative for the internal
combustion engine in automotive applications. The technology still has some hurdles
to pass before it is a competitive alternative to internal combustion engines. In a
recent presentation at SAE Fuels & Lubricants Meeting and Exhibition in Rio de
Janeiro by Mitchell [2] the fuel efficiency of a fuel cell powered vehicle with on board
fuel reformer was stated to be approximately 46 %, some percentage points over the
best diesel powered vehicles. The cost for the fuel cell alone would however be several
thousand US dollars per kilowatt of power. The average EU car had 78 kW of power
in 2003. The conclusion from this has to be that efforts must be made to improve the
currently working technology, i.e. the internal combustion engine, parallel to
investigating new and perhaps better alternatives.
1.1 MOTIVATION
Simulation tools are becoming increasingly important in the development and
improvement of internal combustion engines. One dimensional simulation tools have
been used within this project to evaluate a new gas exchange system for SI engines,
the Divided Exhaust Period system. In one-dimensional simulation, equations for
conservation of mass, momentum and energy are solved in time and in one space
dimension along the main flow direction in the engine pipes. However, many
2
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.2 CONTRIBUTIONS
The main contribution of this work is the combustion model presented in Paper III.
The presented model combines the empirical approach of using the Wiebe function to
describe the heat release in SI engines with established correlations for laminar
burning velocity. This makes the presented model predictive in terms of changes in
3
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
gas properties such as temperature, pressure and composition. The model is still very
intuitive and easy to interpret or compare with engine tests.
As for the appended papers, my contributions to Paper I and Paper II have
been the experimental investigations involved in those papers along with analysis of
the experimental results. Paper I concerning Divided Exhaust Period was originally
written in two parts, a theoretical and simulation part with fellow licentiate candidate
Christel Elmqvist-Möller as main author, and an experimental part with me as main
author. In Paper III, I carried out all experiments and analysis with very valuable input
regarding how to model combustion from the co-authors. A fruitful team work was
developed between the simulation part of the project, i.e. Christel Elmqvist-Möller,
and the experimental part of the project.
4
Chapter 2
COMBUSTION IN SPARK IGNITED ENGINES
The following paragraphs contain a brief overview of the combustion in port fuel
injected spark ignition four stroke engines. This overview serves as a base for
understanding the simplifications made in the models presented later in this thesis.
Parameters that influence the combustion event and cycle-to-cycle variations are
summarized. The knock phenomenon is explored. Finally, combustion simulation is
discussed.
5
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
2.1.2 Fuel
Fuel is usually injected in the inlet runner towards the inlet valves in port fuel injected
engines. Some of the injected fuel is deposited on the inlet runner walls, on the valve
stems and on the back face of the inlet valves to form a fuel film and puddles. Fuel
enters the cylinder during the intake stroke in vapor phase and in liquid phase. The
fuel evaporates and mixes with air and residual gases during the intake and
compression stroke.
2.1.3 Turbulence
The flow over the inlet valves creates turbulence. Large scale rotating charge motion is
created from the intake jet in the form of tumble, swirl or combinations thereof. As
shown for example by Söderberg [7], turbulence increases close to top dead center
due to tumble breakdown in tumbling engines. Late inlet valve closing combined with
low valve lift creates more turbulence around top dead center in the same work.
Piston motion during the compression stroke also creates a vortex near the cylinder
wall which further increases turbulence at TDC [8].
6
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
2.2 COMBUSTION
The mixture in the combustion chamber is ignited by the spark discharge between the
electrodes of the spark plug and a flame kernel is formed. Exothermic chemical
reactions take place in the flame kernel. Diffusion of heat and radicals from the flame
kernel surface makes the kernel expand and start propagating in the combustion
chamber. A thin, smooth reaction sheet, with thickness in the order of 0.1 mm,
separates the burned gases from the unburned gases [8]. See Glassman [9] for a
thorough discussion about laminar flame propagation. The early flame has been
shown to propagate with a speed close to experimentally determined laminar burning
velocity [10].
The time between spark discharge and any measurable increase in pressure
due to combustion is sometimes referred to as the ignition delay period. The term
ignition delay is misleading because the flame kernel will usually have grown to a
significant size by this time. For example, Tagalian and Heywood [11] measured flame
radiuses of about 5 mm when 0,1 % of the charge mass was burned. A more correct
term would be flame development period. When the flame kernel has reached the size
of the smallest turbulent eddies, the reaction sheet is wrinkled, resulting in increased
surface area of the flame and increased burning velocity. The flame extinguishes when
the flame eventually reaches the relatively cold combustion chamber walls
7
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
The reference laminar burning velocity SL,0 is a function of equivalence ratio and
burned gas mole fraction ~
xr :
S L , 0 (λ , ~ (
x r ) = 1 − 2,06 ⋅ ~ ) ( )
x r0, 77 ⋅ ⎛⎜ Bm + Bλ λ −1 − λ −m1 ⎞⎟
⎝
2
⎠
(2.3)
Values for the constants in Equations (2.2) and (2.3) are found in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Constants for the laminar burning velocity correlations in Equations
(2.2) and (2.3) from [8].
Fuel λm Bm Bλ
[cm/s] [cm/s]
Methanol 1/1,11 36,9 -140,5
Propane 1/1,08 34,2 -138,7
Isooctane 1/1,13 26,3 -84,7
Gasoline 1/1,21 30,5 -54,9
8
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
2.3 KNOCK
The knock phenomenon has been extensively studied in the past. Grandin [15] gives
an interesting historical review of the evolution of knowledge in the field of knock
from the 1920’s an onwards. Knock is initiated by autoignition of the unburned
charge ahead of the flame front. Autoignition of the end gas leads to a pressure
disturbance in the combustion chamber which induces pressure oscillations. The
knocking sound associated with the combustion chamber pressure oscillations have
given knock its name. It is also the pressure oscillations, together with an increase in
heat transfer, that are potentially damaging to combustion chamber components.
H 2 O 2 + M → OH + OH + M (2.5)
9
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
NTC behavior and also low temperature heat release is more pronounced for
long unbranched paraffinic hydrocarbon chains such as n-Heptane. Risberg [17]
summarizes the principal reaction in the low temperature chemistry of some different
hydrocarbons. Iso-octane, or 2,2,4-tri-methyl-pentane, is more branched and displays
less low temperature heat release and less pronounced NTC behavior which is also
evident from Fieweger et. al. [18] where the ignition delay is measured in a shock tube
for different PRF mixtures, see Figure 2.1. An increase in temperature increases the
ignition delay time in a certain temperature range in the figure. Commercial multi
component fuels contain aromatics, olefins and perhaps also oxygenates and their
autoignition chemistry is different from that of paraffins [19].
Figure 2.1 Measured ignition delay times in n-Heptane iso-octane mixtures with
stronger NTC behavior for higher fractions of n-heptane. Figure 17 in [18].
10
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
information on the octane rating of fuels in the CFR engine. However, the RON and
MON values alone are not sufficient to describe autoignition quality of a fuel. The
engine operating conditions, which influence the temperature and pressure history
experienced by the fuel, has to be accounted as well. This can be done by using the
Octane Index as described in [17][21][22].
11
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
inhomogeneous. The charge is cooled close to the wall or heated by hot spots, e.g.
soot particles.
12
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
Table 2.2 Predicted vibration modes with natural frequencies below 20 kHz for
a cylinder with 86 mm diameter and speed of sound c = 950 m/s.
Vibration 1st circumferential 2nd circumferential 1st radial
mode m = 1, n = 0 m = 2, n = 0 m = 0, n = 1
α m,n 1,84 3,05 3,83
f m,n [kHz] 6,47 10,7 13,5
um,n
13
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
14
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
highest degree of physicality among the three predefined SI combustion models but
requires measured or estimated swirl and tumble coefficients and has several
multipliers for calibrating the simulated combustion to measured data. The simpler
approaches, measured combustion profile and Wiebe function, rely on measured data
but can be very useful in the absence of a physical model.
Three dimensional calculation of in cylinder flow and chemical reactions is
not practical today, in part because of computer execution time and because of the
complex flow field and complex chemical kinetics in the cylinder. State of the art
chemical kinetics codes can predict the oxidation of single component fuels, but the
research has not yet reached full insight when it comes to practical fuels.
It is important to note how the combustion profile, taken from measured
data or calculated by the Wiebe function, is handled in GT-Power. The combustion
profile in GT-Power defines the rate at which the charge enters a set of chemical
equilibrium equations. The equilibrium composition changes with temperature and
mixture strength, which causes the heat release rate to lag the burn rate in a GT-
Power simulation [4]. A simple example is shown in Figure 2.2 below. Wiebe
parameters fitted to experimental data were used as input to a GT-Power simulation.
The GT-Power burn rate in the figure is identical to the input Wiebe function, except
for the scaling which is due to a combustion efficiency set below 1 in the simulation.
Comparison of the 50 % heat released point and 10-90 % combustion duration of the
input and output heat release is given in Table 2.3. As seen in the table it is necessary
to adjust the Wiebe parameters to some extent before simulation since the Wiebe
parameters are interpreted as burn rate in GT-Power.
15
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
1.0
Normalized heat
0.6
0.4
Measured heat release
Fitted Wiebe
0.2 GT-Power burn rate
spark timing GT-Power heat release
0.0
-15 0 15 30 45 60
Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 2.2 Measured heat release and Wiebe function fitted to measured data
used as input to GT-Power together with GT-Power cumulative burn rate and
heat release.
Table 2.3 Wiebe combustion parameters for measured simulation model input
heat release and simulation model output heat release from GT-Power. The
difference is due to the interpretation of input combustion profile as burn rate as
described above.
50 % heat 10-90 % combustion Wiebe
released duration parameter m
[aTDC] [CA]
Input/measured heat
22,8 22,2 3,97
release
Simulation model output
24,8 23,9 3,64
heat release
Difference 2,0 1,7 -0,33
16
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
⎡ ⎛ θ − θ 0 ⎞ m +1 ⎤
xb (θ ) = 1 − exp ⎢− a⎜ ⎟ ⎥ (2.11)
⎢⎣ ⎝ ∆θ ⎠ ⎥⎦
is used to describe the fraction of fuel burnt xb based on considerations of chain
reactions in general. θ is the crank angle, θ0 is the start of combustion and ∆θ is the
total combustion duration. The parameter m is called the combustion mode parameter
and defines the shape of the combustion profile. m was introduced by Wiebe to
describe the time dependence of concentration of reaction centers by the function:
ρ = kt m (2.12)
where k is a constant. In a spherically expanding flame with constant flame speed one
would expect m to be 3. Accelerating flame speed should give higher values and vice
versa. Wiebe found m to be in the range 2-4 for SI engines. The value of the constant
a in Equation 5 follows from the chosen definition of end of combustion. With the
mass fraction burned xb,EOC = 99,9% at the end of combustion, a has the value:
17
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
case is an aggregate ignition delay time for completion of the entire autoignition
mechanism as described previously. The instantaneous value of the integral is a
measure of the fraction of pre-autoignition reactions that have been completed. It is a
way of accounting for the pressure and temperature history of the unburned charge.
It is clear from the description of autoignition chemistry above that the
pressure and temperature history of the charge determines the current state of the
charge and influences the instantaneous ignition delay time for a given mixture.
Pressure and temperature history determines to what extent the low temperature
chemistry has been completed and also the concentration of the critical H2O2 species.
Nevertheless, an ignition delay time with only temperature and pressure dependence
has been used in Equation (2.10) by several authors, e.g. Douaud and Eyzat [29]. The
functional form used for this aggregate ignition delay time is:
⎛B⎞
τ = Ap − n exp⎜ ⎟ (2.15)
⎝T ⎠
The functional form is similar to the Arrhenius expression for chemical reaction rate
with a pressure dependence added. The constants in Equation (2.15) have been fitted
to several fuels from rapid compression machine test data as well as from engine test
data. Values of the constants from several references are summarized in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Reported values for the constants in Equation (2.15) from several
authors for temperature in K and pressure in bar. The value of the constant A
has been recalculated to metric units in some cases.
A n B
Fuel [s.barn] [K] Reference
PRF 95 1.62e-2 1,7 3800 Douaud, Eyzat [29]
PRF 100 1,87e-2 1,7 3800 Douaud, Eyzat [29]
Commercial RON 93, MON 82 1.02e-4 1,01 6220 Douaud, Eyzat [29]
PRF100 (isooctane) 1.68e-2 1,49 7457 By et.al. [30]
Gasoline/Ethanol, RON95 7.59e-3 1.325 3296 Current study
Measured ignition delay times for the reference gasoline RD387 and a
surrogate mixture with similar ignition delay behavior as gasoline from Gauthier et. al.
[31] are shown in Figure 2.3. The pressure exponential n was found to be 1,64 for
n-Heptane and 1,01 for the reference gasoline. The solid markers are ignition delay
without residual gases at λ = 1. Other markers are at various lean, stoichiometric and
rich mixtures with or without EGR. λ and EGR seem to affect ignition delay time.
18
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
Gauthier et. al. [31] concludes that richer mixture gives shorter ignition delay at higher
pressures and lean mixture gives longer ignition delay. Increased EGR content
increases ignition delay. The test data in Gauthier et. al. [31] does not include the
region where NTC behavior is expected, compare with Figure 2.1, but it is clear that
temperature dependence decreases at lower temperature.
Temperature [K]
1250 1111 1000 909 833
current study
Douaud, Eyzat
1 (1978) PRF 87
Ignition delay at 5 MPa [ms]
0.1
λ = 0,5 to 2,
0 to 30% EGR
Gasoline
λ = 1, no EGR Surrogate A
0.01
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
-1
1000/T [K ]
Figure 2.3 Measured ignition delay time from shock tube experiments for a
reference gasoline RD387 with (RON + MON)/2 = 87 and a surrogate
mixture as reported in Gauthier et. al. [31]. Solid markers are λ = 1 and no
EGR. The lines are estimated aggregate ignition delay time according to
Equation (2.12) calibrated by engine tests with constants reported in Table 2.4.
19
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
It is also noticeable from the pressure and temperature data in Figure 2.5 that
knock occurs at temperatures slightly above 900 K which is a critical temperature for
the decomposition of H2O2 as described earlier. Also drawn in Figure 2.5 is an
isentropic compression line leading to one of the knocking cycles calculated with
γ = 1,25 which shows that the operating conditions for these knocking cycles were
quite similar, i.e. they are close to the same isentrop.
Unburned zone temperature [K]
909 833 769 714 667 625
10
Cylinder pressure [MPa]
20
Chapter 2 – Combustion in spark ignited engines
10.5
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
890 900 910 920 930 940
Unburned zone temperature at knock [K]
Figure 2.5 Unburned zone temperature and pressure at knock for several
knocking cycles at different operating conditions. The dash-dotted line is an
isentrop drawn from one of the knocking cycles calculated with γ = 1,25.
In a recent work by Yates et. al. [32] an attempt has been made to model the
different regions of the ignition delay times by one Arrhenius type expression
according to Equation 2.15 for each of the three regions: low temperature region,
NTC-region and high temperature region. The total ignition delay time is formed by
the expression:
[
τ = (τ 1 + τ 2 )−1 + τ 3−1 ]
−1
(2.16)
with values for the constants for a model gasoline found in Table 2.5. The resulting
ignition delay surface is shown in Figure 2.6 with ignition delay histories for three
knocking cycles. It is evident from the figure that the knocking cycles just barely enter
the high temperature region for this test data, which explains why the single stage
ignition delay model shown in Figure 2.3 works well. Yates et. al. [32] also show that
fuel/air ratio can be modeled by the relationship:
τ (λ ) = τ λ =1λ β (2.17)
where β ≈ 0,67, identified from Figure A.1 in Yates et. al. [32].
21
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Table 2.5 Constants for a model gasoline in three part ignition delay model from
Yates et. al. [32].
ln(A) n B
τ1, low temperature -19,7 -0,101 16196
τ2, NTC-region 11,33 -1,623 -3136
τ3, high temperature -11,02 -0,949 15250
Figure 2.6 Ignition delay surface from three part ignition delay model from Yates
et. al. [32] for a model gasoline with ignition delay trajectories for 3 knocking
cycles.
22
Chapter 3
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
This chapter contains a summary of the measurement system used in the experimental
part of this work along with estimated errors in the measurements in order to give a
general idea of the measurement accuracy. A few paragraphs are devoted to signal
processing, which plays a key role in obtaining high quality measurement data. Finally,
the engines used in the experiments are described, including a brief overview of the
Divided Exhuast Period system.
3.1 MEASUREMENTS
The measurements conducted within this project had several key purposes. One of
the purposes was to be able to calibrate a simulation model of the Divided Exhaust
Period engine. The second purpose was to gain further understanding of how the
Divided Exhaust Period engine responds to different changes in operating conditions
and exhaust system geometries. Furthermore, measurements were used as a tool to
create and calibrate empirical models for knock and combustion in SI engines, as
described in Paper II and Paper III.
23
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
24
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
transducer manufacturer is < ±60 kPa for the GM12D cylinder pressure transducers.
Cyclic temperature shift, i.e. thermal shock, typically leads to too low measured
pressure during combustion and during the following expansion stroke [40]. Lee et. al.
[41] have quantified the effects of thermal shock in an uncooled transducer with
similar properties as the ones used in this work and found that thermal shock
persisted through the exhaust stroke, ultimately affecting measured IMEP with up to
-4 %. One drawback with using the dead weight pressure tester at ambient
temperature, which was the case here, is that the sensitivity of the uncooled GM12D
transducers at ambient temperature might be different from the sensitivity at
operating temperatures in the engine cylinders. The manufacturer states the thermal
sensitivity shift to ±2 % in the temperature range 20 - 400° C. Both cyclic temperature
shift and thermal sensitivity shift can be kept lower for cooled transducers.
25
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
emissivity of the material. The emissivity is a measure of how close to a black body
radiator the material is and is a number between zero and unity. Many metals and
aluminium in particular has low emissivity. Aluminium has emissivity in the range of
about 0,05 to 0,2 depending on oxidation and alloy [46]. A small absolute error in
estimated emissivity will give large errors in measured temperature with this low
emissivity. Therefore, a small area on the manifold was painted with matte black paint
which should have an emissivity around 0,9.
26
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
91
measured data points
90 interpolated data
Turbo speed [1000 x rpm]
89
88
87 single cycle
(+1000 rpm)
86
average
error in corrected
85 average average
-180 -90 0 90 180 270 360 450 540
Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 3.1 Error in measured turbo speed from disturbance detected as impeller
blade passage make large difference in the averaged data. Single cycle data (top)
has been shifted up 1000 rpm.
27
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Lambda was measured with an ECM AFRecorder 2000A with the stated
accuray ±0.008 for 0,8 < λ < 1,2 [48]. Fuel mass flow was measured by weighing the
fuel in a small reservoir with approximately 2,5 dm3 volume. Calibration of the ASE
scales was performed by applying known weights to the scales. A measurements
accuracy of < ±0,1 % FS was obtained in static calibration, but the measured fuel flow
varied significantly over an emptying cycle of the reservoir with the engine running in
steady state. Typically, the measured fuel mass flow would decrease during each
emptying cycle as in the example in Figure 3.2. This highlights the difference between
static and dynamic calibration. The fuel flow measuring system behaved perfectly in
static condition, but quite poorly in dynamic conditions. Dynamic calibration has not
been performed for any of the measuring systems involved in this work.
6.6 1650
6.3 1350
6.1 1150
0 20 40 60 80
Time [s]
Figure 3.2 Measured fuel flow and the fuel mass in the scales during steady state
engine operation.
28
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
180
Cylinder pressure [kPa]
160
140
120
100
Figure 3.3 Cylinder pressure from a single cycle during intake stroke sampled
with 12-bit A/D converter. A 1,5 kHz FIR low pass filter has been applied to
the data. (3000 rpm, 1,49 MPa imep)
29
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
1000
Peak amplitude
envelope
Cylinder pressure [kPa]
100
10
0 2 4 6 8 10
Frequency [1/revolution]
Figure 3.4 Frequency content for several consecutive cycles at 1000 rpm and the
peak amplitude envelope.
30
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
The amplitudes of the peaks decrease at higher frequencies. Figure 3.5 shows
the peak frequency envelope for several engine speeds. The peak amplitudes on a per
engine revolution basis look very similar for all engine speeds and the peaks become
buried in noise above 30 times the engine revolution frequency, which leads to the
recommendation to low-pass filter the data with the cut-off frequency:
N N
f LP = 30 ⋅ = [Hz] (3.1)
60 2
with the engine speed N given in rpm.
10 suggested cut-off
frequency
0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Frequency [1/revolution]
Figure 3.5 Cylinder pressure frequency envelope per engine revolution at operating
conditions from 1000 rpm to 5000 rpm at high load. Several consecutive cycles at
steady state operation was used in the analysis.
Figure 3.6 shows the cylinder pressure frequency content again, with the
useful frequency range according to Equation (3.1) marked. It is noticeable from
Figure 3.6 that the natural frequencies of the combustion chamber, see Chapter 2.3.3,
show up at high engine speed, although there was very few knocking cycles in the data
set. Low amplitude combustion chamber pressure oscillations seem to be the result of
the rapid pressure rise with respect to time during combustion at high engine speed.
31
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Pressure [kPa]
100 Cutoff frequency
0,75 kHz
1 1500 rpm
0.01
0 2 4 6 8 10
Pressure [kPa]
100 1,5 kHz
3000 rpm
1
0.01
0 5 10 15 20
Pressure [kPa]
100
2.25 kHz
4500 rpm
1
0.01
0 5 10 15 20
Frequency [kHz]
Figure 3.6 Cylinder pressure frequency content analyzed from several consecutive
cycles at steady state operation and suggested cut-off frequencies at 30 times the
engine rotational frequency.
32
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
0,5
1
h(k ) = ∫ H (2πq )e
i 2πqk
dq = [H (2πq ), q > q0 ] =
2π − 0,5
q0
(3.3)
1 1
= ∫e
i 2πqk
dq = sin (2πq0 k ), k = −∞..∞
2π − q0
πk
which is an infinite sequence. The impulse response of the ideal low pass filter is
usually truncated with some kind of window function to make computation possible
and to limit the computation time. The Hanning window was chosen in this work. A
Hanning window with width 2M + 1 centered around k = 0 is given by:
⎛ k−M ⎞
w(k ) = 0,5 − 0,5 cos⎜ π ⋅ ⎟, k = − M ..M (3.4)
⎝ M ⎠
By introducing the sinc function:
⎧ sin (πk )
⎪ , k ≠0
sinc(k ) = ⎨ πk (3.5)
⎪⎩ 1 , k =0
Equation 3.3 can be simplified and the final normalized filter kernel is:
⎡ ⎛ k−M ⎞⎤
2q 0 ⋅ sinc(2q 0 k ) ⋅ ⎢0,5 − 0,5 cos⎜ π ⋅ ⎟⎥
⎣ ⎝ M ⎠⎦
g (k ) = h(k ) ⋅ w(k ) = , k = − M ..M
∑ g (k )
(3.6)
The filter length determines the steepness of the filter. The length of the filter
was chosen to get a filter kernel with Kf periods of the sinc function by setting the half
filter length M according to:
Kf
2πq 0 M = 2πK f ⇒ M = (3.7)
q0
Kf = 3 was used for most of the filtering in this work. A higher Kf, i.e. a longer filter
kernel, gives steeper filter characteristics at the cut-off frequency but also more
pronounced non-causal behaviour which shows up as ringing in the filtered signal
prior to steep changes in the raw signal. This can be undesired in for example band
pass filtering for knock onset detection, as described further below. Kf can be
explained as the number of oscillation periods in the filtered signal before and after a
step in the input signal.
Figure 3.7 shows an example of cylinder pressure data filtered with the
described windowed sinc filter. The suggested cut-off frequency from section 3.2.1 is
33
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
1,5 kHz, which seems to preserve the characteristics of the data. A lower cut-off
frequency removes significant frequency components and produces lower pressure
rise rates and lower peak pressure, as seen in the figure. A higher cut-off frequency
will attenuate less noise.
4.8
4.6
25 30 35
Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 3.7 Cylinder pressure filtered with zero phase shift FIR-filter with
1,0 kHz and 1,5 kHz cut-off frequency. (3000 rpm, 1,49 MPa imep)
34
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
⎡ ⎛ k − M ⎞⎤
2 ⋅ (q1 ⋅ sinc(2q1 k ) − q 0 ⋅ sinc(2q 0 k )) ⋅ ⎢0,5 − 0,5 cos⎜ π ⋅ ⎟
⎣ ⎝ M ⎠⎥⎦
g BP (k ) = , k = − M ..M
∑ g BP (k )
(3.9)
One major drawback with using this type of filter is the non-causal properties
of the filter. This will introduce ripple in the signal prior to the actual knock onset.
Using a short filter decrease the ripple but the filter steepness also decreases. A FIR
filter according to Equation (3.9) is good for evaluating knock level, but not for
detection of knock onset.
35
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
36
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
37
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
important which gives an even higher CV. A high value of CV gives a low γ. This can
help in understanding the general trends γ of in the combustion chamber. During the
compression stroke in a PFI engine, the cylinder charge consists of air and fuel. Air
consists mainly of diatomic molecules with 5/2 degrees of freedom giving
γ = 7/2 = 1,4 at low temperature. The fuel has very high CV and γ close to 1, which
means that overall γ is dependent on air/fuel ratio. Residual gases contain carbon
dioxide and water, which are triatomic, giving a slightly lower γ than that of pure air.
Temperature rise during combustion decrease γ since vibrational energy becomes
important. Figure 3.8 shows CV/R for some of the gas molecules found in the
combustion chamber over the temperature range relevant to SI engines. Iso-octane is
included in the figure as an indication of the heat capacity of a hydrocarbon fuel.
80
11/2 CO2
CV / R (iso-octane)
9/2 60
H2O O2
CV / R
7/2
5/2 N2
40
H2
H
3/2
1/2 iso-octane 20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Temperature [K]
Figure 3.8 CV/R for some molecules from JANAF tables [54].
38
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
0,2888
γ= +1
cV (T ) (3.20)
cV (T ) = 0,7 + T ⋅ (0,155 + Ai ) ⋅ 10 −3
Residual gas content was obtained from simulations. The pressure ratio:
p(θ )
PR(θ ) = −1 (3.22)
p m (θ )
was used to capture the transition from unburned gases to burned gases during
combustion. The normalized pressure ratio weighted average of unburned gas γu and
burned gas γb was used in the heat release calculations:
γ = (1 − PR norm ) ⋅ γ u (T ) + PR norm ⋅ γ b (T ) (3.23)
39
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Ratio of specific heats and calculated heat release with the different models
are shown in Figure 3.9. As seen in the figure, the fuel vapor and residual gases has a
major impact on the ratio of specific heats compared to pure air. The AVL model
estimate of γ is inbetween the frozen mixture model and the pure air model. Ratio of
specific heats from the simulation software GTPower is also included in the figure,
which is an average of the burned and unburned zone γ. GTPower predicts higher γ
during combustion since dissociation at high temperatures is included in the γ-model.
Dissociation introduces smaller molecules with less degrees of freedom of motion and
hence higher γ. One conclusion from the tests with different γ-models is that the
simple linear and quadratic models fail to capture the high temperature behavior of
the charge.
temperature
dependent air
1.40 1.00
AVL model
1.35 0.75
Fuel normalized
heat release
γ = cp/cv
1.20 0.00
Figure 3.9 Comparison of different models for the ratio of specific heats γ in the
mixture and the resulting calculated heat release. Gas composition: λ = 0,9,
gasoline/ethanol fuel and 3 % residual gas content.
40
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
temperature only
frozen mixture
Figure 3.10 Calculated motored pressure with different models for the ratio of
specific heats compared to the measured cylinder pressure.
41
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Exhaust
scavenging
system
Catalyst
Charge air C T
system
Trapping
valve
The reason for dividing the exhaust flow into two different manifolds is to
decrease exhaust back pressure during the exhaust displacement phase and to prevent
interfering pulses between cylinders in four cylinder turbocharged engines. Using
DEP results in decreased residual gas content which should improve knock resistance
and increase volumetric efficiency. The pumping losses are also decreased. Figure 3.12
shows a comparison between mass flow over the exhaust valves in a standard
turbocharged engine and a DEP engine at 5500 rpm full load operation. The energy
rich blow-down pulse is fed to the turbine through the exhaust blow-down system
and the remaining exhaust is evacuated through the scavenging system, with a much
lower exhaust back pressure.
42
Chapter 3 – Experimental method
standard t/c
0.3
DEP
Valve lift
scavenging
system
0.1
0.0
blow-down
scavenging
valve
valve
Figure 3.12 Mass flow and valve lift in the DEP engine compared to a standard
turbocharged engine at 5500 rpm.
43
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Cooled EGR
The DEP engine was equipped with a cooled EGR system with a Valeo water/air
EGR cooler. The EGR was extracted in the exhaust blow-down system, before the
turbine inlet. EGR was inserted upstream of the throttle to assure good mixing with
inlet air and mixing balance between cylinders. A butterfly valve was used to control
cooled EGR rate.
44
Chapter 4
KNOCK MODELING
Paper II contains results from calibration and validation of a knock model based on
the Livengood-Wu knock integral as described in Chapter 2.4.2. Some additional
information about the experiments and calibration of the knock model is found below
together with a new calibration for the ignition delay constants.
4.1 EXPERIMENTS
A limited series of experiments were carried out on the standard turbocharged engine,
see Chapter 3.4.2 for engine details. The purpose of the tests was to calibrate and
validate the knock model at a number of different operating conditions as described in
Paper II. The experiment matrix is repeated below for reference.
Table 4.1 Operating conditions in the knock model calibration and validation
test series.
Engine speed 2500, 3000, 3500 rpm
λ @ 2500 rpm 0,92
λ @ 3000 rpm 0,86; 0,99; 1,10
λ @ 3500 rpm 0,84
Fuel 95 RON gasoline w. <5% ethanol
Coolant temperature 90 °C
During the engine tests, the level of knock was judged from a band pass
filtered audio signal recorded by a microphone mounted close to the engine block.
45
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
This method of judging knock level is common, but not entirely repeatable and
somewhat subjective. Unfortunately the inexperienced operators, the author being one
of them, were frightened by the aggressive knocking noise, and very few cycles were
found to be knocking in the test series. An engine failure due to valve-piston
interaction made further tests impossible at the time. However, the low number of
knocking cycles in the test data assured that the engine was operating close to normal
operating conditions. It is the borderline knock operation that is relevant for
simulation purposes. Operation with large fraction of knocking cycles will affect wall
temperature and hence unburned charge temperature which in turn might give a
calibration of the knock model to the wrong temperature range. As described in
Chapter 2.4.2 the autoignition delay time used in this work is an attempt to linearize
the autoignition delay time of a fuel in a temperature range relevant to the normal
operation of an engine. Actual autoignition delay time of a hydrocarbon fuel is
nonlinear due to the presence of cool flames and negative temperature coefficient
regions.
46
Chapter 4 – Knock modeling
detected
knock onset
100 6
60 2
40 0
20 -2
0 -4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 4.1 Cylinder pressure and FIR band pass filtered cylinder pressure for a
knocking cycle.
47
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Figure 4.2 The shape of the knock model optimization target function with
varying A and pressure exponent -n. and fixed temperature coefficient at 2396 K.
The results from some previous studies [29][30] are also shown in the figure.
The three part ignition delay model with λ dependence from Yates [32]
described in Chapter 2.4.2 predicts too late knock onset by 6 to 12 CA for the test
data set used in this work. With a scaling factor of 0,60 for the three part ignition
delay correlation in Equation (2.16), the model fits the test data with similar errors as
the calibrated single part ignition delay model.
48
Chapter 4 – Knock modeling
4.4 DISCUSSION
Douaud and Eyzat [29] found the pressure exponent n in Equation 4.1 to be 1,7 for
primary reference fuels and close to 1 for a commercial gasoline fuel, see table 2.4.
Bradley et. al. [55] refers to an investigation by Hirst and Kirsch where a toluene
reference fuel had a value of n of about 1,3. Toluene reference fuels is a mixture of
toluene and n-heptane which behaves more like typical gasoline fuels in terms of
autoignition in the RON and MON tests [17]. The value of n found in this
investigation is close to 1,3 which gives some confidence to the optimized values. As
for the temperature coefficient B, the optimum value will depend on the operating
region of the engine, i.e. where in respect to the negative temperature coefficient
region in the ignition delay surface of Figure 2.6 the engine primarily operates when
knocking is observed. As shown in the comparison to shock tube ignition delay data
in Figure 2.3 the actual ignition delay time is nonlinear. If the unburned zone
temperature reaches high values before knock occurs, a higher temperature coefficient
will probably be required. The approach described in Paper II, to optimize the
constant A only, seems to be a good approach considering the discussion above.
The unburned zone temperature as shown in Figure 2.4 is usually calculated
by assuming isentropic compression of the end gas. If low temperature heat release
occurs in the end gas, the temperature will be higher than the isentropically calculated
temperature. This is a key difference that should be kept in mind when comparing the
autoignition correlations from SI engine tests to for example shock tube autoignition
data or HCCI combustion data.
49
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
50
Chapter 5
COMBUSTION MODELING USING THE WIEBE
FUNCTION
Paper III contains results from adapting and calibrating a combustion model based on
the Wiebe function and laminar burning velocity correlations to experimental data.
The Wiebe function was described in detail in Chapter 2.4.1 and the laminar burning
velocity correlations used are summarized in Chapter 2.2.1. This chapter has some
additional background and information about the measurements and calibration
procedure for the combustion model, which is not covered in the paper. Results from
two similar correlations that served as a base for the current investigation are shown
first. The contribution of this work is to include laminar burning velocity correlations
in the Wiebe combustion model to account for variations in cylinder gas properties. It
is suggested that Paper III is read before reading this chapter.
51
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
⎡ ⎛ θ − θ 0 ⎞ m +1 ⎤
xb (θ ) = 1 − exp ⎢− a⎜ ⎟ ⎥ (5.1)
⎣⎢ ⎝ ∆θ ⎠ ⎦⎥
where xb mass fraction burned
θ crank angle
θ0 start of combustion
∆θ total combustion duration, θEOC - θ0
m combustion mode parameter
a scaling factor, a = -ln(1-xb,EOC)
∆θˆ = ∆θ 0 ⋅ ∏ g i (5.2)
i
mˆ = m0 ⋅ ∏ hi
i
where f, g and h are the functions for relative influence of each operating parameter i.
The functions for relative influence were identified by normalizing experimental data
with the base operating condition. To make the identified functions valid for base
operating other than that used during identification, each function for relative
influence is normalized by the current base operating condition, i.e.:
Gi
gi = (5.3)
Gi , 0
where Gi is the function found during the identification procedure with an arbitrary
base operating condition. The model structure is very flexible since only the relative
influence of each operating parameter is used.
52
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
5.1.3 Csallner
Csallner [56] correlated Wiebe combustion parameters to spark timing, air/fuel ratio,
engine speed. Load influence was modeled by in cylinder pressure and temperature
during the compression stroke at 60 bTDC, referred to as p300 and T300, and residual
gas fraction. Two naturally aspirated engines were used during in the work: a single
cylinder MTU MB 331 engine with 3,3 dm3 displacement converted to gas operation
and a four cylinder BMW engine with 0,5 dm3 displacement and two valves per
cylinder. The correlations are summarized for the BMW engine in Table 5.1. The
correlations for temperature and residual gas content do not have the form of
Equation 5.3. Data from a total of 31 operating conditions are shown in the work.
53
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
Table 5.1 The Wiebe combustion parameter correlations from Csallner [56] for
the BMW 2 dm3 four cylinder two valve engine. Spark timing, temperature and
pressure relative to gas exchange TDC.
Ignition delay Total combustion Combustion mode
∆θd duration, ∆θ parameter, m
Fi Gi Hi
Spark timing
430 − θ spark 1 1
θspark
Air/fuel ratio 2,2λ2 − 5,6λ2 −
0,375λ + 0,644
λ ≤ 0,95 3,74λ + 2,54 9,52λ + 4,92
Air/fuel ratio
same as above same as above − 1,33λ + 2,27
λ > 0,95
Compression
T300, 0 T300,0
temperature 2,16 − 1,16 1,33 − 0,33 1
T300 T300
T300 [K]
Compressions −0 , 47 −0 , 28
p300 p 300 1
pressure, p300
Residual gas x rg ,0 x rg ,0
0,088 + 0,912 0,237 + 0,763 1
content, xrg x rg x rg
Engine speed 400 8 ⋅ 10 −5 660 750
1+ − 1,33 − + 0,625
N [rpm] N N2 N N
As can be seen in Table 5.1, only air/fuel ratio and engine speed was found to
influence the combustion mode parameter in Csallner’s correlations. This is in part
due to the method used for fitting Wiebe functions to test data. First of all, the 50 %
burned point was used as anchor angle in the identification. The total combustion
duration was adjusted so that the mass fraction burned in an 8 CA interval beginning
at the 50 % burnt point was equal in the test and the Wiebe function. The combustion
mode parameter was then chosen arbitrarily to match measured data. This rather
strange identification procedure was chosen to get correct mass burn rate when the
burn rate is high and also because start of combustion could not be identified.
54
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
5.1.4 Witt
Witt [57] made two sets of Wiebe parameters correlations to compare throttled and
throttleless operation in the simulation and testing of a modern BMW four valve
naturally aspirated engine running on part load. Similarly to Csallner, the Wiebe
parameter identification method used by Witt focused on getting the 50 % burn point
correct in the identified Wiebe function. A very large number of tests were used to
identify the combustion model parameters: 221 operating points in throttleless
operation and 193 operating points in throttled operation. The parameters
investigated were spark timing, residual gas content, indicated work and engine speed.
Results from throttled operation are shown in Table 5.2. All identified equations have
the form of Equation 5.3, i.e. normalized functions for relative influence.
Table 5.2 Wiebe combustion parameter correlations from Witt [57] for throttled
operation in a BMW 4-valve engine.
Ignition delay, Total combustion Combustion mode
∆θd duration, ∆θ parameter, m
Fi Gi Hi
Indicated work
1,112 − 0,545wi1,5 1,115 − 0,346 wi 1,007 + 0,004 ln wi
wi [kJ/dm3]
Engine speed 1,246 ⋅ 10 5 18,49 1,046 −
0,992 − 1,355 −
N [rpm] N2 N 4,075 ⋅ 10 −7 N 1,5
5.2 EXPERIMENTS
As described in Paper III, a few engine operating parameters were singled out as
candidates that were likely to have an influence on the combustion. The first group of
operating parameters are those related state of the combustible mixture of air and fuel,
namely air/fuel ratio, intake pressure and temperature and residual gas content.
Engine speed and spark timing make up the other group of parameters which are
related to the turbulence which the flame encounters as it traverses the combustion
chamber. Spark timing actually related to both groups, since the temperature and
55
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
pressure during the early part of combustion is highly dependent on the spark timing.
Coolant temperature was also varied in the tests.
The experimental procedure chosen for the combustion model investigation
was to vary one parameter at the time while trying to keep other influencing factors
constant. As all engine experimentalists know it is not straightforward to change only
one parameter in an engine test, since many factors are affected when one control
parameter is changed. Retarding the spark timing in a turbocharged engine will for
example increase exhaust temperature which leads to increased turbine power
producing a change in intake pressure and temperature which in turn affects
combustion. The waste gate and throttle were used to control the intake conditions.
Some care was also taken to tune the charge air cooler controller. This means that the
engine torque was varying quite significantly between the tests. Figure 5.1 shows some
test data from a spark timing variation test just to see the large variation in for
example turbine inlet temperature and torque. The figure also shows that spark timing
were chosen close to MBT timing and later. The pressure after the compressor varies
more than the intake pressure since the throttle was used to control intake pressure.
56
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
50 % burnt [aTDC]
Intake pressure [bar]
1.2 Intake temp. 30
Lambda
50
%
bu
rn
t
1.1 20
ng
im i
a rk t
Sp
1.0 10
Lambda
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Test no.
Engine speed
960 250
940
Turbo speed / 100 [rpm]
Tu
Turbine inlet temp. [°C]
ue
in
920 rq
e
To
in
le
t
Torque [Nm]
230
te
900
m
p.
880 220
860
Turb 210
o spe
840 ed
820 200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Test no.
Figure 5.1 Test data from spark timing variation with constant intake manifold
pressure and temperature. Other measured parameters vary quite significantly.
Waste gate and throttle was varied along with charge air cooling.
Two sets of tests were performed with varying engine speed. One test was
made with constant spark timing and one test with constant angle for 1 % mass
fraction burned. Figure 5.2 shows the measured data from these two tests. The tests
with constant 1 % burnt point were made to remove the influence of varying flame
development period in terms of crank angles at different engine speeds.
57
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
3 35
Intake temp.
2 30
1 % burnt [aTDC]
50 % burnt [aTDC]
Lambda 1 25
Lambda
t
0 rn 20
bu
%
50 n g
1 % burnt rk timi
-1 Spa 15
-2 10
1500 2000 2500 3000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Engine speed [rpm]
Figure 5.2 Test data for speed variation tests with constant spark timing (left)
and constant 1 % burnt (right).
Interaction effects between parameters might be left out when using a one
parameter at the time approach [58]. A second set of experiments was carried out to
check for interactions, and also to have a data set for validation of the model. A
reduced order two level factorial design with center points, augmented with a so called
star composite design, was used. Figure 5.3 shows the basic structure of the design.
The factors in the test were air/fuel ratio, spark timing, residual gas content and intake
temperature. Engine speed was constant at 3000 rpm and the intake pressure was
125 kPa. The experimental matrix is shown in Table 5.3. The goal with the design of
experiments approach was not to fit a response surface to the data but to get a
validation data set which spans the experimental range. If there are significant
interaction effects between any of the variables, the fit of the identified model in the
validation data set will be poor. A total of 30 tests were performed for the validation
data set.
58
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
Table 5.3 Operating points for the factorial experimental design at 3000 rpm
and 125 kPa intake pressure.
Normalized Air/fuel Spark timing Intake EGR
level ratio [bTDC] temperature [°C] fraction
+1 1,00 18,0 45,0 2,4%
-1 0,80 13,0 35,0 0,4%
0 0,90 15,5 40,0 1,4%
+1,41 1,04 19,0 47,1 not possible
-1,41 0,76 12,0 32,9 0,0%
Extra points
Base points
1
Normalized level, factor 2
Central points
0
0,5
R=2
-1
-1 0 1
Normalized level, factor 1
Figure 5.3 Basic structure of central composite two level factorial design
augmented with a star complement design.
59
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
60
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
1.0 3%
0.6 1%
Error
0.4 0%
0.2 -1 %
0.0 -2 %
-15 0 15 30 45 60
Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 5.4 Comparison of nonlinear least squares and double logarithm method
of fitting a Wiebe function to measured data.
61
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
3
2,66
Mean
error
Error [CA]
1
0,58
Standard
0 deviation
-0,21
-0,68
-1
1% 5% 10% 50% 90% 10-90 %
Mass fraction burned
Figure 5.5 Mean error in mass fraction burned points of fitted Wiebe function
compared to measured data. Ensemble averaged data from 89 operating
conditions.
The first influencing function for total burn duration, gSL, accounts for the
laminar burning velocity influence. Paper III shows the good results when using
inverse laminar burning velocity as influencing function. In order to identify the
remaining influencing functions for total combustion duration, data was normalized
with the laminar burning velocity influencing function. The spark timing influencing
62
Chapter 5 – Combustion modeling using the Wiebe function
function, gspark, is also described in Paper III. Below I will describe the process of
identifying the engine speed influencing function, gspeed, in more detail, which for some
cases requires normalizing with both laminar burning velocity and spark timing
influencing function.
63
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
∆θ0 x g(SL)
1.1 1.1
∆θ0
∆θ
∆θ
1.0 1.0
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Engine speed [rpm] Engine speed [rpm]
70
∆θ0 x g(SL) x g(θign)
1.3 0.584
alt. G(N) = 0.0102 x
65
1.2
Measured and
estimated ∆θ
1.1 60
∆θ
1.0 55
0.9 50 measured
0.8 G(N) = 2,13 - 55,5 x N
-0,5
model
45
0.7
40
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Engine speed [rpm] Engine speed [rpm]
The functional form for the speed influencing function was chosen from
Wittt [57]. Several other functional forms were tested for the speed influencing
function. One of them, a power function, is shown in the bottom left figure of Figure
5.6. The behavior outside of the identification data range has to be considered when
choosing the functional form.
5.5 RESULTS
The results from calibrating the combustion model along with some validation are
summarized in Paper III. All identified influencing functions are summarized in an
appendix to the paper.
64
Chapter 6
CONCLUSIONS
65
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
center and approximately 90 percent mass fraction burned as limits. If knock was
predicted within/below these limits, the combustion was phased later until either of
the boundaries were reached at simulated knock onset. This is not to be confused with
the severity of knock or any other measure of knock. It is just a way to get useful
output from the simulations.
The use of one dimensional simulation tools in engine development has put
new demands on engine measurement technique. Both cycle or time averaged
measurements and crank angle resolved measurements fill an important role in
simulation model calibration and validation. This thesis has put special focus on
measurement data conditioning with some suggestions on filtering of noisy data and
filtering for knock detection. These two filtering tasks have separate demands on the
filters. Another area of interest is the calculation of heat release from cylinder pressure
data. If the data is to be used for calibration or validation of combustion in a
simulation model, it is essential to use the same assumptions and models as the
simulation software when calculating heat release from measured data. The model for
ratio of specific heats described in this thesis is an attempt to get closer to the
simulation software in estimating in cylinder gas properties during combustion. The
Woschni model for heat transfer is common between the simulations and measured
data analysis. The largest discrepancy between measured data analysis and the
simulation software is found in the single zone calculation of heat release for the
measured data. A two zone model was used in the simulation software in order to be
able to draw conclusions regarding knock.
66
Chapter 6 – Conclusions
knock limited combustion phasing for the most likely knocking cycle, the ensemble
average cycle could be simulated to give an accurate prediction of engine output at the
knock limit.
67
REFERENCES
69
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
70
References
[30] By, A., Kempinski, B., Rife, J. M.; Knock in Spark Ignition Engines; SAE
Technical Paper 810147.
[31] Gautier, B. M., Davidsson, D. F., Hanson, R. K.; Shock tube determination of
ignition delay times in full-blend and surrogate fuel mixtures; Combustion and
Flame 139 (2004) 300-311.
[32] Yates, Andy D. B., Swarts, André, Viljoen, Carl L.; Correlating Auto-Ignition
Delay And Knock-Limited Spark-Advance Data For Different Types Of Fuel;
SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2083.
[33] www.adlinktech.com (May 2005)
[34] www.ueidaq.com (May 2005)
[35] www.gemssensors.com (May 2005)
[36] www.avl.com (May 2005)
[37] www.kistler.com (May 2005)
[38] www.druck.com (May 2005)
[39] www.ametekcalibration.com (May 2005)
[40] Pischinger, Rudolf; Engine Indicating – User Handbook; AVL List Gmbh,
Austia, 2002.
[41] Lee, S., Bae, C., Prucka, R., Fernandez, G., Filipi, Z. S., Assanis, D. N.;
Quantification of Thermal Shock in a Piezoelectric Pressure Transducer; SAE
Technical Paper 2005-01-2092.
[42] Odendall, B.; A Discussion of Errors in the Measurement of Gas Temperature;
MTZ 3/2003 pp. 196-199.
[43] www.pentronic.se; StoPextra 6/98
[44] www.isotech.co.uk (May 2005)
[45] www.testo.com (May 2005)
[46] www.monarchinstrument.com
[47] www.micro-epsilon.de (May 2005)
[48] www.ecm-co.com (May 2005)
[49] Smith, Steven W.; The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal
Processing, second edition; California Technical Publishing, San Diego,
California 1999; http://www.dspguide.com
[50] Brunt, Michael F. J., Rai, Harjit, Emtage, Andrew L.; The Calculation of Heat
Release from Engine Cylinder Pressure Data; SAE Technical Paper 981052.
[51] Klein, Marcus, Eriksson, Lars; A Specific Heat Ratio Model for Single-Zone
Heat Release Models; SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1464.
[52] Kanury, A. Murty; Introduction to combustion phenomena; Table A.3; New
York cop. 1975.
[53] AVL List GMBH; Operating Instruction AVL Concerto Software Version 3.0;
AVL List GMBH, Graz 1999.
71
Empirical Combustion Modeling in SI Engines
72
PAPER I
2005-01-1150
Fredrik Lindström
Royal Institute of Technology
1
Inter- Exhaust Exhaust Intake
cooler blowdown scavenging valves
Exhaust valve valve
blow-down
Valve lift
system
Exhaust
scavenging
system
Catalyst
Charge air C T
system 90 180 270 TDC 450 540 630
Trapping
valve Crank angle [aTDC]
Figure 2 Valve lift curves for the blowdown, scavenging and intake
valves.
Figure 1 Schematic view of the of the exhaust systems configuration in
the DEP engine.
duration of the blowdown phase. Figure 3 shows
TECHNICAL CONCEPT simulated mass flow in both of the DEP engine exhaust
systems compared to a standard turbocharged engine at
The Divided Exhaust Period (DEP) concept is an 5500 rpm. Over 60% of the mass flow and the highest
alternative way of accomplishing the gas exchange in a enthalpy levels are found in the blow-down pulse at
turbocharged engine. The aim is to improve the 5500 rpm in the standard turbocharged engine. The
performance of a turbocharged engine, regarding low- remainder of the mass flow is generated by the piston
end torque, peak power and emissions. In the DEP displacement, which can be seen in the figure as a
engine the two exhaust ports from each cylinder have second peak in the mass flow.
been separated. The blowdown pulse is evacuated
through the blowdown valve, which leads to the In previous sections five main difficulties with a 4-
turbocharger. As the pressure in the exhaust is cylinder conventional turbocharged engine were
decreased and the piston displacement phase described:
commence, the scavenging valve open and lead the • Cylinder evacuation
remaining exhaust gas directly to a close-coupled • Negative PMEP
catalyst (CCC). By bypassing the turbine the high • Pulse interaction between cylinders
pressure in the manifold connected to the blowdown • Knock sensitivity
valve is avoided and the gas exchange is improved. The • Cold start
engine is schematically shown in Figure 1. Figure 2
show the valve lifts for the blowdown valve leading The same reasoning as for a conventional turbocharged
towards the turbine and the scavenging valve connected engine holds true for the DEP concept when it comes to
to the close-coupled catalyst. choosing between a small or large turbine. The main
driving force behind the DEP concept is to avoid or
Important parameters for turbine performance are the decrease the negative effects coupled to a small turbine.
mass flow, the pressure difference and temperature The turbine is restricted in mass flow so that a
difference over the turbine, since these are related to the wastegate needs to be used at high load. Using a
enthalpy. Ideally the high enthalpy blowdown pulse is
located around BDC and a positive pressure difference
exists between cylinder and exhaust manifold. When the
standard t/c
pressure in the cylinder decreases, the positive pressure
difference decrease. By opening the cylinder to the 0.3
scavenging manifold, which has a lower pressure DEP
Mass flow rate [kg/s]
2
wastegate is a loss of potential work. With the DEP EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP
concept the mass flow is divided already in the cylinder,
which has the same effect as a wastegate at high load, SIMULATION MODEL - In order to investigate the DEP
i.e. bypassing the turbine. concept more thoroughly an engine model was
developed in the 1-D software GT-Power [4]. The aim
Dividing the mass flow already in the cylinder, as with was to gain a more in-depth understanding of the gas
the DEP concept, has other advantages compared to a exchange process and to optimize the engine design
wastegate. Cylinder evacuation was mentioned as an with respect to valve timing and pipe design. 1-D
important factor for engine performance. By opening up simulation is based on the solution of the governing
the cylinder to a low pressure exhaust manifold, which in equations; momentum-, energy- and mass-
a sense is connected to the atmosphere, the high conservation, in 1-D. However, in order to transform a
pressure created by the turbine can be avoided. This 3-D problem to 1-D some additional information is
enables a better evacuation of the cylinder. needed. Figure 4 give some example of areas
dependent on input data.
By making the duration of the exhaust blowdown valve
only slightly longer than 180° CA, the pulse interference
between cylinders at blowdown can be eliminated. By 3-D phenomena 1-D model
• Combustion Representation of 3-D
eliminating the pulse into the cylinder the DEP engine • Pipes phenomena in 1-D
should be able to decrease the amount of hot residual • Valves ⇒
gases in the engine and decrease the gas exchange • Turbocharger Dependence on quality
pumping losses, thus enabling better volumetric • Intercooler of input data
efficiency, knock resistance and overall engine • …
efficiency.
Catalyst light-off time has a great influence on cold start Additional information
emissions. Hence, it is important to keep as much heat • Measurement data
• Coefficients
in the exhaust as possible in order to quickly reach • Advanced sub-models
catalyst light-off. Therefore placement of the catalyst
close to the exhaust ports is important. By implementing
Figure 4 Schematic image of the transformation from a 3-D heat
valve de-activation for the blowdown valve, all of the transfer, flow and chemical kinetics problem to 1-D.
exhaust gas is lead directly to the close-coupled catalyst
mounted in the scavenging exhaust system.
Consequently the emissions in terms of catalyst light-off The engine model was built by transferring the
time can be improved. The turbine is in this configuration geometrical dimensions of the engine into the model.
effectively bypassed and the turbine will not act as a Since the governing equations are only solved in 1-D, in
heat sink during cold start. the direction of the flow, 3-D effects must be taken into
account in some other manner. Flow loss coefficients
From the discussion presented above it is clear that are used in order to find the right pressure loss occurring
valve phasing and duration will have a great influence on from pipe bends, materials etc. These coefficients are
the results. In order to investigate and evaluate the DEP pre-defined in the software and usually not in need of
concept even further a number of cam profiles were much adjustment. The flow through the intake and
designed. The aim was to minimize the number of cams exhaust valves was modeled by discharge coefficients
and to have a clear strategy when evaluating the gas as a function of lift height, which was measured in a flow
exchange process for the DEP concept. The tests with bench [5]. Simulating the combustion is more
different camshafts aimed at determining the influence complicated. Due to the combination of 3-D flow and
on pumping losses, engine output and cylinder chemical kinetics it is necessary to use special
scavenging. Four key factors were identified and are combustion models or measurement data. In this project
described in Table 1. the combustion has been simulated with the Wiebe
function [4], which can be described as a curve fit to
Table 1 Identified key factors for cam timing and duration evaluation. measured heat release. The main drawback with using
such a combustion model is its dependence on
Case Parameter Objective measured combustion data, i.e. at what crank angle
Duration blowdown Investigate influence of cylinder 50 % of the fuel is burnt and the duration of the
1
valve emptying towards turbine
combustion. Hence, simulating unknown engine
Duration scavenging Investigate required energy to concepts relies on the quality of the assumptions made
2
valve drive the turbine for these combustion parameters.
Overlap scavenging Investigation of overlap influence
3
valve – intake valve between exhaust and intake valve The turbocharger is another complicated area.
Turbocharger modeling is based on performance maps
Investigate intake valve closing
4 Intake valve closing influence with constant TDC
for the compressor and turbine. These performance
overlap maps are based on flow bench measurements with
3
stationary flow [6]. The experimental data is then inter- 28 mm exhaust valve diameter. The cylinder head was
and extrapolated to obtain the full-range maps. The modified to house 32 mm exhaust valves with separated
maps relate speed and efficiency to the pressure ratio exhaust runners to the exhaust pipe flange. The coolant
and mass flow over the turbine and compressor. Since channels were also modified to ensure sufficient cooling
the turbocharger models are based on stationary of the exhaust ports. Specifications of the DEP engine
measurements in a limited range, these models can are found in Table 2.
require an extensive amount of tuning [7]. In order to
simplify the turbocharger simulation it is important to Table 2 DEP engine specifications.
measure pressure, mass flow and turbocharger speed.
Bore 86 mm
The turbocharger simulation is difficult to perform when
Stroke 86 mm
no knowledge of the actual engine performance is
Compression ratio 9.5
available.
Combustion chamber Pentroof
MEASUREMENT SET-UP - Since little knowledge was Inlet valve diameter 32 mm
available of how the combustion would change with the Exhaust valve diameter 32 mm
DEP concept and how the turbine would react to the
change in mass flow when the exhaust pulse was The valve durations are quite short compared to an
divided, a prototype engine was built to run parallel to ordinary turbocharged engine, especially the scavenging
the simulations. A number of experiments have also valve. In order to handle the dynamics of the valve and
been made to determine the potential of the DEP yet obtaining maximum valve lift, lightweight materials
concept. The engine tests were performed at KTH and had to be used for the exhaust valves. TI-Al exhaust
Fiat-GM Powertrain in-house facilities. valves were originally chosen to maximize possible
valve lift area. These valves were replaced with sodium
Cylinder pressures have been measured with AVL cooled steel exhaust valves due to high thermal load on
GM12D piezoelectric pressure transducers at a sample the blowdown valve. Lightweight conical valve springs
rate of 0.1 to 0.4 crank angles. 200 or more cycles have and valve spring retainers were also used along with the
been recorded for each operating condition as a base for standard roller rocker arms and hydraulic lifters.
cycle resolved indicated statistics. [8][9] Crank angle
resolved pressures in the intake and exhaust system A number of exhaust and inlet camshafts were
have been measured at several positions with manufactured in order to evaluate different valve
piezoresistive and steel diaphragm strain gauge overlaps; between the exhaust scavenging valve and the
pressure transducers. These pressure transducers were inlet valves as well as the overlap between the
calibrated in a static test rig, obtaining a total static blowdown valve and the scavenging valve in the exhaust
measurement uncertainty of the measuring chain in the stroke. The choice of valve lift profiles is described in
range ± 3 - 8 kPa. Analogue anti aliasing filters and detail in Table 3. Continuously variable camshaft
digital zero phase shift low pass filtering was applied to phasing, with an adjustment range of 50 CAD, was
the pressure signals prior to further analysis. installed on both the exhaust and the intake camshaft.
Temperatures have been measured time resolved with The lift profiles of the different camshafts were
type K thermocouples, with a typical response time in measured when mounted on the engine to ensure
the order of one second. Emissions have been proper valve lift curves as well as proper positioning
measured time resolved at different positions in the relative to the crankshaft.
exhaust systems. A two-channel fast flame ionization
detector was used for crank angle resolved hydrocarbon EXPERIMENTS - Several operating modes has been
measurements in the cold start tests. Other identified and tested on the DEP engine. These include:
measurements include fuel mass flow rate, broadband
lambda, turbine speed and torque. Air mass flow was 1. Low speed, where the scavenging exhaust system is
estimated from measurements of lambda and fuel mass shut off with the trapping valve, see Figure 1, to get
flow. sufficient mass flow over the turbine and prevent
blow through.
Limiting factors during the maximum torque tests has 2. High speed, where both exhaust systems are open
been 980°C maximum turbine inlet temperature and assist in emptying the cylinders.
measured with a 6 mm thermocouple, minimum overall 3. Cold start, where the blowdown exhaust system,
relative air/fuel ratio of 0.77, 100 kPa maximum boost leading to the turbine, is shut off.
pressure and maximum coefficient of variance of IMEP
(COV) 5 %. Ignition was advanced towards the knock Table 3 Valve opening and closing events for the reference camshaft.
limit.
Valve Duration Opening Closing
HARDWARE MODIFICATIONS – The DEP engine was [CAD] [aTDC] [aTDC]
based on a standard 2 dm3 turbocharged port fuel Exhaust blow-down 200 120 320
injected engine. The standard cylinder head with 4 Exhaust scavenging 159 220 379
valves per cylinder had 32 mm inlet valve diameter and Intake 239 341 580
4
process and power potential during cold start with only
Exhaust Exhaust the exhaust scavenging valve active. The second set of
blowdown scavenging Intake tests focused on optimizing the valve timing for the cold
valve valve valves
start. The second set of tests were performed in a cold
Valve lift
2.2
measured simulated
2,4
2.0
IMEP
2,2 1.8
IMEP and BMEP [MPa]
BMEP [MPa]
2,0
1.6 closed
trapping
1,8
1.4 valve
BMEP
1,6 standard t/c
1.2 reference cam
1,4
early scavenging 1
1.0 early scavenging 2
1,2
6
50 opening, denoted early scavenging 2 in Figure 9, results
in pumping work similar to the standard turbocharged
0
engine at low speed. However at high engine speeds the
pumping losses are significantly reduced. The power
improvement from the reduced pumping losses in the
-50
DEP engine is up to 10 kW at 5000 rpm, which is about
PMEP [kPa]
showed that increased overlap between the scavenging Residual gas content was not measured in the engine
exhaust valve and intake valves boosted the engine tests. However, the pressure difference from intake
output significantly. A 20 % increase in available torque system to exhaust system at the gas exchange TDC
was observed at 1500 and 2000 rpm when the overlap gives a hint to how well the exhaust gases are
between exhaust scavenging valve and intake valves scavenged from the cylinders. Figure 11 shows this
was increased by 40 CAD. pressure drop obtained from engine tests with reference
camshaft and with early exhaust scavenging valve
The DEP engine exhibits positive PMEP over an opening. The standard turbocharged engine barely
extended speed range compared to a standard reaches a positive pressure difference in the mid speed
turbocharged engine, i.e. work is added to the range whereas the DEP engine has a large positive
crankshaft during the gas exchange. In addition, high pressure difference at all speeds up to 4500 rpm for the
speed negative PMEP is reduced compared to the reference camshaft. Increasing the scavenging exhaust
standard t/c engine. Figure 9 shows PMEP over the valve duration by early opening, denoted early
engine speed range with three different camshaft scavenging 1 in Figure 11, gives more time and valve
combinations, varying the opening of the scavenging area for evacuating the exhaust and also a higher
exhaust valve and blowdown/scavenging valve overlap, pressure difference at higher speeds. A very long
see Figure 5 top graph. Advancing the scavenging exhaust scavenging valve duration, denoted early
exhaust valve opening 15 CAD, denoted early scavenging 2 in Figure 11, gives a lower pressure
scavenging 1 in Figure 9, extends the range of positive difference at lower speeds, primarily due to loss of
pumping work and decreases high speed pumping available energy in the exhaust blowdown system and
losses even further compared to the DEP reference
camshaft. A very early scavenging exhaust valve
100 standard t/c
reference cam
80 early scavenging 1
cylinder at 360 aTDC [kPa]
early scavenging 2
8% 60% 60
Pressure drop over
Residual gas content at IVC
40
DEP improvement
6% Standard 40% 20
t/c engine
0
4% 20%
-20
DEP engine
-40
2% 0% 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Engine speed [rpm]
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Engine speed [rpm]
Figure 11 Pressure drop over cylinders (from intake runner to exhaust
Figure 10 Comparison of simulated values of residual gas content in runner in the scavenging exhaust system) at 360 aTDC for several
the cylinder for the DEP engine vs. the standard turbocharged engine. tested divided exhaust period exhaust valve lift profiles.
7
subsequent loss of boost pressure. Tuning of the significant pressure drop in the cylinder when the
scavenging exhaust system also has an effect on the exhaust scavenging valve opens at 230° aTDC. At the
pressure difference. When the exhaust scavenging valve same time, the pressure in the exhaust scavenging
duration is increased the optimum pulse reflection system rises to the pressure in the cylinder. The cylinder
behavior shifts towards higher speeds. pressure has reached atmospheric pressure a little after
270° aTDC, i.e. after half the exhaust stroke. During
GAS EXCHANGE IN THE DEP ENGINE – Ideally, the overlap between intake and exhaust scavenging valves,
exhaust scavenging system and the cylinder pressure there is a 30 kPa pressure drop over the engine, causing
has reached atmospheric pressure when the intake large amounts blow-through and poor trapping ratio.
valve opens. However, a very large pressure difference There is no evidence of pulse interference between
also produces large amounts of blow-through, i.e. fresh cylinders at blowdown with the 200 CAD duration of the
charge goes straight through the engine. Excessive exhaust blowdown valve. However, only moderate
blow-through gives poor trapping ratio, especially at low 34 kPa boost pressure is produced with open trapping
engine speed when valve overlap time is long. Blow- valve.
through can however also be of benefit to increase
possible boost pressure when the compressor operates With closed trapping valve, the boost pressure reaches
close to the surge limit. To increase the trapping ratio, 57 kPa, an increase of 23 kPa compared to open
the trapping valve in the exhaust scavenging system has trapping valve. All of the exhaust is forced through the
been introduced after the close-coupled catalyst, see turbine causing a higher pressure in the exhaust
Figure 1. By increasing the pressure in the exhaust blowdown system in the second half of the exhaust
scavenging system at low engine speed, the blow- stroke. The exhaust scavenging system acts as a buffer,
through can be limited. filling at the end of the exhaust stroke and during
exhaust scavenging/intake valve overlap and emptying
Figure 12 shows an example of the cylinder pressure its contents into the cylinder during exhaust
and both exhaust system pressures together with intake blowdown/scavenging valve overlap of the following
pressure in the DEP engine during gas exchange at cylinder in firing order. This can be seen in Figure 12
2000 rpm with open and closed trapping valve in the where the pressure in the exhaust scavenging system is
exhaust scavenging system. The initial behavior of the higher than the blowdown system pressure shortly after
blowdown pulse is similar in both cases. The top figure, the exhaust scavenging valve has opened. The
where the trapping valve is completely open, shows a measured hydrocarbon content in the blowdown system
at 2000 rpm with closed trapping valve is 6500 ppm CH4
equivalent, supporting the theory that fresh charge is
transported to the exhaust blowdown system via the
Cylinder Exhaust blow-down
Intake Exhaust scavenging exhaust scavenging system. By closing the trapping
valve, BMEP increases from 1,60 MPa to 1,71 MPa and
(open trapping valve)
180 Blow-down
brake specific fuel consumption decreases 16 %,
Pressure [kPa]
Temperature [K]
Standard t/c
800 50 800 0.0
90 135 180 225 270 315 360
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Crank angle [aTDC]
Engine speed [rpm] Figure 14 Temperature and mass flow in the turbine inlet in the DEP
Figure 13 Comparison of turbine inlet temperature and turbine speed engine compared to a standard turbocharged engine at 2500 rpm.
between measurement and simulation.
200
50% mass fraction burnt, 31 and 26 CAD aTDC for the
standard and DEP engine respectively. Due to the later 4000 rpm
phasing of combustion the standard engine has a 150 3000 rpm
slightly higher peak temperature in the blow down 2000 rpm
phase. However in the displacement phase the
temperatures are comparable. Hence, the problem with 1000 rpm
100
Valve lift
the high temperature can be explained by the fact that
the mass flow over the turbine for the DEP concept is
considerably smaller than for the standard engine during
50
the displacement phase. As a consequence this phase 180 270 360 450 540 630
has a much smaller effect in lowering the mass
averaged temperature for the DEP concept. Crank angle [ATDCf]
Figure 15 Cylinder pressure during the gas exchange for increasing
engine speeds in the DEP engine at full load with early scavenging
Flow over exhaust valves - The engine works as
exhaust valve opening. Valve lift curves for blow-down and scavenging
intended at low engine speeds with a significant exhaust valve and the inlet valves are also shown.
pressure drop in the cylinder when the exhaust
scavenging valve opens. This can be seen in Figure 15
that show measured cylinder pressures at several
engine speeds. At speeds over 3000 rpm the piston
displacement phase of the exhaust stroke starts to show
in the cylinder pressure. This is due to choked flow over
the exhaust valves. Figure 16 show Mach number
across the exhaust valve at 5500 rpm. The DEP engine
shows a substantially longer period of choked flow
during the blowdown phase compared to the standard
turbocharged engine, shown by the arrow in Figure 16. It
9
1.4
1.00 scavenging
1.2 DEP
valve
0.75 blow-down Standard t/c
DEP engine
valve
1.0
Pressure [MPa]
0.50
0.8 (4)
0.25
Heat release rate
Mach number
0.6
0.00 (2)
1.00 0.4 (3)
(1)
Standard engine
0.75 0.2
10
and cooling system in the exhaust blowdown system,
Std t/c 1 cat from exhaust blowdown valve to the turbine. Since the
Std t/c 2 cat cold start catalyst light-off is handled by the close
DEP 1 cat coupled catalyst in the scavenging system, aggressive
DEP 2 cat measures can be taken to lower the exhaust gas
~38%
temperature in the blowdown system without affecting
catalyst light off time and cold start emissions.
Furthermore, the aging problem of the catalyst, due to
Time [s]
300°C 300°C <50 ppm It appears that the scavenging exhaust system plays a
before cat after cat HC major role in the gas exchange even when the trapping
Figure 19: Emissions cold start, 2 cat denotes close-coupled pre-
valve in the scavenging exhaust system is closed. By
catalyst 900 cpsi before a main catalyst 400 cpsi. 1 cat denotes close- varying the trapping valve opening, the exhaust
coupled main catalyst 400 cpsi. backpressure during the displacement part of the
exhaust stroke and during exhaust scavenging/intake
valve overlap can be adjusted. This can be used to
In spite of the lower exhaust temperature, the time to control the pressure difference over the engine and limit
300° C in front of the catalyst was reduced with 50% blow-through. Partially closing of the trapping valve can
compared to the standard engine. The cold start tests also provide the turbine with increased mass flow and
also demonstrated the ability to reduce emissions with higher enthalpy by increasing the cylinder pressure
the DEP system. In comparison to the standard during exhaust blow-down/scavenging valve overlap.
turbocharged engine the light off time, measured as the
time to achieve less than 50 ppm HC downstream the Variation of exhaust valve sizes might prove valuable to
catalyst, was reduced with 38% as shown in Figure 19. decrease the choking of the exhaust systems at high
This result was achieved solely by optimizing the speeds seen in Figure 15 and Figure 16. Also, CFD
exhaust scavenging/intake valve overlap. With additional computation of the in cylinder flow would give valuable
calibration of lambda strategy, ignition timing and information about how the spatial asymmetry in the
injection timing the results should be improved. cylinder introduced by only having one of two exhaust
valves open during exhaust scavenging/intake valve
DISCUSSION overlap affects the scavenging process. Introducing
temporal asymmetry in the intake valve opening could
High power-density engines are all limited by engine perhaps improve the scavenging further.
knock. By completely emptying the combustion chamber
from exhaust gas, engine knock can be significantly The demands on valve lift profiles vary a lot in terms of
reduced. This is accomplished by creating a higher both valve lift duration and overlaps over the engine
pressure in the intake than in the exhaust system during operating range. The DEP concept would benefit from
exhaust/intake valve overlap, thereby flushing out the fully variable valve mechanisms.
exhaust gas. However, with a PFI engine this usually
leads to high engine out HC emissions since the fuel in Tuning of the exhaust system is usually not considered
the port is also blown out into the exhaust. By using in the design of modern turbocharged engines. Exhaust
direct fuel injection this problem can be overcome. A pipe tuning usually requires long pipe lengths due to the
system such as the DEP system, which can create a high temperature and high speed of sound in the
positive pressure difference over the engine and has exhaust gases. Compact exhaust manifolds are used in
large blow-through, would naturally also benefit greatly turbocharged engines to minimize heat losses prior to
from DI. the turbine to preserve exhaust energy and also to
decrease catalyst light-off time. Another reason for
The temperature in the exhaust blowdown system choosing compact manifolds is to improve transient
proved to be high in the DEP engine, making some kind response of the engine. Introduction of the exhaust
of measure to reduce turbine inlet temperature scavenging system opens new possibilities for pipe
necessary. The high temperature arises since only the tuning without affecting the turbine. The lower
hottest of the exhaust gasses are fed through the temperature in the exhaust scavenging system
turbine, whilst the relatively colder exhaust gas in the combined with the short scavenging valve duration
late part of the exhaust stroke are completely bypassed enables short pipes to be used in a tuned scavenging
the turbine. This puts high demands on the materials system, facilitating vehicle packing of the engine.
11
The DEP concept is not necessarily limited to ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
turbocharged SI engines. Any turbocharged engine
could benefit from the reduced exhaust backpressure The authors would like to thank Eric Olofsson, Emil
and pumping losses in the DEP concept, especially Åberg and Adam Rundqvist for their invaluable help and
when wastegate controlled turbochargers are used. The guidance during the project.
DEP scavenging system can be considered as a more
efficient wastegate. The authors wish to thank the Green Car project funded
by the Swedish National Energy Administration for
CONCLUSION financing parts of this investigation.
12
DEFINITIONS, ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS PMEP: Pump Mean Effective Pressure
DEP: Divided Exhaust Period MBT: Maximum brake torque spark timing
IMEP: Indicated Mean Effective Pressure cpsi: cells per square inch
13
PAPER II
2003-01-3123
Börje Grandin
Fiat-GM Powertrain
Gautam Kalghatgi
Shell Global Solutions
[bar]
To find the knock onset from the measured data, the 2
10
cylinder pressure was digitally band pass filtered. The
band pass window of the filter is centered on the 1st
1
circumferential mode of the knock induced pressure 10
oscillations, which normally has the highest energetic 0 5 10 15 20
Frequency [kHz]
content [8]. The width of the window is chosen to get
small phase distortion at the frequency of the first
circumferential mode. The cut-off frequencies 3.5 and Figure 2 Fast Fourier transform of a knocking cycle with
10 kHz were chosen. The reason for band-pass filtering frequency peaks at the oscillation modes of the cylinder.
instead of high-pass filtering is to avoid high frequency
measurement noise and disturbances.
Knocking cycles were identified by the peak value of the
The analytical solutions of the general wave equation
band-pass filtered cylinder pressure signals. The
[10] in a closed cylinder with flat ends, which is a rough
threshold for defining a cycle as knocking was set to
model of the combustion chamber, gives a good starting
1 bar. The peak amplitude of the band pass filtered
point for the selection of cut-off frequencies for the filter.
cylinder pressure was used as individual cycle knock
The solutions and, hence, the natural frequencies of the
combustion chamber model are [8, 9]: index (KI). A threshold of min{0.7 ⋅ KI; 0.9} was used for
determination of knock onset (KO), which proved to give
accurate results of KO. The value 0.7KI is chosen as a
α m ,n
f m ,n = c ⋅ Equation 1 compromise between the risk of erroneous detection of
πB KO due to signal noise and the accuracy of the KO
detection. More elaborate methods for determination of
where m is the circumferential mode number, n the KO has been suggested in [11] which also includes the
radial mode number, αm,n the vibration mode factor search of a zero crossing ahead of the threshold in the
determined by means of Bessel’s equations, cf. Table 3, filtered pressure signal. Figure 3 shows pressure and
B the bore and c the speed of sound estimated to band-pass filtered pressure of a knocking cycle and the
950 m/s. Table 3 contains estimated natural frequencies detected KO.
of the combustion chamber model.
Since information of the knock location is not available,
the measured KO is only accurate to within
Table 3 Acoustic modes of a closed cylinder model of the approximately 1-2 CA, depending on engine speed. The
combustion chamber with c = 950 m/s distance between the pressure transducer and the
(m,n) (1,0) (2,0) (0,1) (3,0) (1,1) autoignition center together with the local speed of
description 1st 2nd 1st 3rd 1st sound determines the delay between real KO and
circ. circ. radial circ. combin measured KO [12].
ed
αm,n 1.841 3.054 3.832 4.201 5.332 100
Cylinder pressure [bar]
Filtered cylinder
pressure [bar]
60
40
Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the measured knock
cycles confirms the calculated frequency of the 1st 20 2 KI
circumferential mode at approximately 6.5 kHz. Figure 2 0 0
is an example of the frequency content in a knocking -2
cycle. The peaks at the frequencies of the cylinder -20 0 KO 20 40 60
oscillation modes from Figure 2 are clearly seen. CA
Another observation is that the transducer position, 12
mm off the cylinder center, suppresses the Figure 3 Cylinder pressure for a knocking cycle from
circumferential oscillation modes while the radial modes lean combustion at 3000 rpm and filtered cylinder
at approximately 14 and 19 kHz are more prominent. pressure of the cycle. KO = 14.1 CA, KI = 2.57.
SIMULATION MODEL plotted for several knocking cycles and showed in
relation to the average, minimum and maximum value
The aim with the simulation model is to integrate a knock for the entire test run.
model into an existing one-dimensional model of the
engine. The one-dimensional model is based on 18
thermodynamic laws for calculation of the pressure and Maximum CA for 50% burnt
16
3000 fuel-rich 32
3
30
Combustion duration [CA]
2
28
26
1
50 60 70 80 90 100
Mass fraction burned at knock [%] 24
SS
control block changes the CA for 50 % burnt and the
2
duration of the combustion. When this information is
0.03
sent back into the combustion model cylinder pressure
0 0.02
etc are recalculated. These calculations are performed
2 0.01
until the engine simulation fulfills the pre-defined 1.5 1
convergence criteria. Once the model has converged the 0.5 0 0 X1
X2
one-dimensional simulation of the engine will provide us
with information about the new operating condition. This
goes on until the control block no longer detects any Figure 8 The shape of Equation 6 when X1 and X2 are
knock, the integral is less than one at 93% burned mass. changed and X3 = 3800 K. The marker shows the values
The simulations will then have resulted in information recommended by Douaud and Eyzat [16].
about the original knock onset as well as one-
dimensional information about the engine operating
condition. The parameters of Equation 6 are coupled. X2 and X3
control the shape of the Livengood-Wu integral and X1
The combustion phasing can also be used to move the sets the overall level of the integral. An increase in X1
engine from non-knocking, inefficient conditions to its will decrease the value of the Livengood-Wu integral,
most efficient operating condition. Hence, by using the which can be compensated by an increase in X2. This
control block for combustion phasing simulations can be makes Equation 6 inadequate for optimization purposes.
performed at the operating condition most efficient for Suggestions to use mean pressure and temperature
the specific engine. between ignition and knock onset for optimization have
not been attempted in this paper [10,15]. Instead the
values of X2 and X3 were set to 1.7 and 3800
Results respectively, according to the recommendations of
Douad and Eyzat [16]. Equation 6 was minimized by
OPTIMIZATION OF THE KNOCK MODEL finding the optimal value for X1. The optimization was
performed using pressures and knock angles from
Since the main interest is to find the knock onset rather measurements and simulated temperatures of the
than knock time in seconds Equation 5 has been unburned gas from the two-zone combustion model. The
modified accordingly. The idea was to minimize the error optimization was performed for several cases with
of the Livengood-Wu integral at measured knock angle varying speed and lambda. Only a fraction of the
by using the least squares method as suggested by measured knock cycles were used for optimization,
Douaud and Eyzat [16]. Equation 6 gives the equation to whilst the rest were used for validation of the identified
be minimized. parameter X1. The optimization resulted in that the
following values were used for the constants:
simulated,
optimized X1
16
2500 rpm
940
930 3000 rpm
Unburned zone
temperature [K]
3500 rpm Figure 12 Measured versus simulated knock angle for 3000
920
rpm and λ= 0.99 (Stoich.), λ= 0.86 (rich), λ= 1.1 (lean)
910
900 14
Simulated knock onset
890 13
880 12
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11
10
Knock onset [ATDC]
9
8
7
Figure 10 Unburned zone temperature as a function of
6
knock onset for three different speeds.
6 8 10 12 14
However, as can be seen from Figure 10, setting a Measured knock onset [CA ATDC]
general temperature threshold for knock onset, valid
over a range of speeds, will become inaccurate. If a
Figure 13 Measured versus simulated knock angle for
temperature limit should be used for identifying knocking
combustion, this limit will need to be changed depending 3500 rpm and λ= 0.84
From the previous pictures it can be concluded that [3] Heywood, J. B., “Internal Combustion Engine
knock onset can be modelled within an accuracy of Fundamentals”, McGraw – Hill, inc 1988.
approximately two degrees.
[4] Burgdorf, Klaas, “Engine Knock: Characteristics and
The measured and simulated knock onset as well as the Mechanisms”, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of
average difference has been summarized in Table 4. Technology, 1999
Average
0.16 0.28 -2.42 -0.08 -0.32 [7] Fischer, M., et.al., “Knock Detection in Spark-Ignition
Difference Engines: New Tools and Methods in Production-Vehicle
Development“, MTZ Issue 3/2003.
[1] By, A., Kempinski, B. and Rife, J.M., “Knock in Spark [16] Douaud, A. M. and Eyzat, P., “Four-Octane-Number
Ignition Engines”, SAE 810147, 1981. Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behaviour of Fuels
and Engines”, SAE 780080, 1978.
[2] König, G. and Sheppard, C. G. W., “End Gas
Autoignition and Knock in a Spark Ignition Engine“, SAE
902135, 1990.
DEFINITIONS, ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS CTDC combustion top dead center
Gautam Kalghatgi
Shell Global Solutions and KTH
1
and temperature because of the many uncertainties in and especially for gasoline:
modeling these complex phenomena. Livengood and
Wu [1] suggested that the integral of the inverse of the α g = 2,4 − 0,271φ 3,51
ignition delay τ : (4)
t knock β g = −0,357 + 0,141φ 2, 77
1
∫ τ dt = 1 (1)
t =0 Bm, Bφ and Φm are constants for specific fuels. ~
xrg is the
can be used to predict when knock occurs. Douaud and residual gas mole fraction.
Eyzat [2] proposed the Arrhenius type expression for
ignition delay time: One origin of turbulence is the intake stroke; small scale
turbulence is created by the flow over valves and large
⎛B⎞ scale charge motion is created by orientation and
τ = A * p −n exp⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (2) symmetry of intake ports. The piston motion also
T
⎝ u⎠ induces turbulence. The turbulence intensity in tumbling
where p is cylinder pressure and Tu is unburned zone engines increases near top dead center due to tumble
temperature. The constants A, n and B are different for breakdown. Measurements of local turbulence near the
different fuels. A value of 1.7 for the pressure exponent, spark plug in a tumbling SI engine by Söderberg [6]
n is suggested by Douaud and Eyzat for primary show turbulence intensity maximum just before or at
reference fuels, PRF, [2] whereas Hirst and Kirsch [3] TDC and also a transition from larger scale turbulence to
suggest that for toluene / n-heptane mixtures, toluene smaller scale turbulence around TDC. Turbulence
reference fuels, TRF, n~1.3. A value of 3800 is intensity decreases after TDC.
suggested for B for PRF fuels by Douaud and Eyzat. It is
only the latest part of combustion, when temperature is THE WIEBE FUNCTION - One way of specifying the
high, that will give significant contribution to the integral combustion rate in a two-zone combustion model is the
in Equation 1. This might have implications on where Wiebe function [7]. The functional form:
simulated combustion have to be accurate with a knock
⎡ ⎛ θ − θ 0 ⎞ m +1 ⎤
model as described above.
xb (θ ) = 1 − exp ⎢− a⎜ ⎟ ⎥ (5)
The combustion in SI engines has been studied
⎢⎣ ⎝ ∆θ ⎠ ⎥⎦
extensively in the past. The first stage of combustion
after spark discharge is considered to be a spherical is used to describe the fraction of fuel burnt xb based on
flame growing with a speed close to the laminar burning considerations of chain reactions in general and the time
velocity [4]. Cyclic variations originate during the flame dependence of concentration of reaction centers. θ is
development period due to variations in mixture the crank angle, θ0 is the start of combustion and ∆θ is
strength, residual gas content and turbulence close to the total combustion duration. The parameter m is called
the spark plug. Turbulent flame propagation onsets once the combustion mode parameter and defines the shape
the flame radius reaches the local length scale of of the combustion profile. m was introduced by Wiebe to
turbulence. The turbulence wrinkles the flame. Turbulent describe the time dependence of concentration of
burning velocity depends on the laminar burning velocity reaction centers by the function:
and the turbulence intensity and length scales.
ρ = kt m (6)
Several correlations of laminar burning velocity for
different fuels are found in the literature. These where k is a constant. In a spherically expanding flame
correlations describe the influence of air-fuel ratio, with constant flame speed one would expect m to be 3.
pressure, temperature and residual gas content onto the Accelerating flame speed should give higher values and
laminar burning velocity. The experiments are normally vice versa. Wiebe found m to be in the range 2-4 for SI
conducted in constant volume combustion vessels at engines. The value of the constant a in Equation 5
several initial pressures and temperatures. Heywood [5] follows from the chosen definition of end of combustion.
summarizes the results of several authors in the With the mass fraction burned xb,EOC = 99,9% at the end
equations: of combustion, a has the value:
α
⎛ T ⎞ ⎛ p ⎞
β
a = − ln (1 − x b , EOC ) = − ln 0,001 = 6,90 (7)
S L = S L ,0 ⎜ u ⎟ ⎜ (
⎟ 1 − 2,06 ~
x rg0,77 )
⎝ 298 ⎠ ⎝ 1,013 ⎠
Total combustion duration ∆θ is not to be confused with
α = 2,18 − 0,8(φ − 1) (3) 10-90% combustion duration, which is often reported
β = −0,16 + 0,22(φ − 1) from engine tests and used as input to the Wiebe
function in the simulation software GTPower.
S L , 0 = Bm + Bφ (φ − φ m )
2
Relationship between ∆θ and 10-90% combustion
duration are found in Appendix A.
2
The Wiebe function is commonly used in SI engine Table 1 Engine specifications
simulation. Several correlations of one or several of the Bore 86 mm
Wiebe function parameters to engine operating
Stroke 86 mm
conditions have been proposed in the literature, see
Compression ratio 9,5
references [8][9][10]. These works provide correlations
Displaced volume 0,5 dm3 per cylinder
of the change of Wiebe parameters and ignition delay
Cylinder head 4-valve pentroof with
time ∆θign relative to a base operating condition:
central spark plug
∆θˆign = ∆θ ign,0 ⋅ ∏ f i Fuel gasoline, 95 RON
i
∆θˆ = ∆θ 0 ⋅ ∏ g i (8) gas content could be achieved. The engine was fitted
i
with a cooled EGR system. The engine was mounted in
mˆ = m0 ⋅ ∏ hi a test bed with capability of precise control of
i temperatures in engine, charge air cooler and EGR-
system.
and the functions for relative influence of different
operating parameters have the form: Measurement setup - Cylinder pressure was measured
in all four cylinders with un-cooled AVL GM12D
Gi miniature piezoelectric pressure transducers. Cycle
gi = (9)
Gi , 0 individual cylinder pressure referencing was obtained by
setting the average cylinder pressure equal to average
inlet runner pressure in a crank angle interval during the
where Gi are functions describing the influence of intake stroke. Inlet and exhaust pressures were
operating condition i. The relative influence of operating measured at several positions in the intake and exhaust
condition i is found by forming the quota gi. The results system with GEMS 2200-series strain gauge pressure
from Witt [9] have been used with good results in [11] to transducers and Kistler 4045 piezoresistive pressure
predict combustion in simulations. A different approach transducers. The signals were sampled with 0.2° or 0.4°
is found in [12] where functions for relative change crank angle resolution with a 12-bit A/D-converter.
similar to Equation 8 are used to correlate changes of Analogue low-pass filters, chosen with regard to
5% burnt, 90% burnt and max burn rate. The obtained sampling frequency and transducer resonance
changes are used to stretch a predefined Wiebe frequencies to avoid aliasing, and digital FIR-filters with
combustion rate profile to the desired shape. Other zero phase distortion were used to assure undistorted
functional forms for the combustion rate have also been data with low noise. Temperatures were measured with
proposed in [13]. type K thermocouple probes with long insertion lengths
parallel to the gas flow to avoid heat transfer losses. CO2
This paper describes a method to use existing concentration was measured in the intake and exhaust
correlations of laminar burning velocity as a function of to estimate EGR content in the charge. Air/fuel ratio was
pressure, temperature, air-fuel ratio and residual gas measured in the exhaust with an ECM AFRecorder
content to predict the relative change in the Wiebe 2000A. Top dead center position relative to the crank
parameters total burn duration ∆θ and combustion mode angle encoder was determined with high accuracy [16].
m. The use of laminar burning velocity in the modeling
should increase the generality of the combustion model The trapped residual gas fraction was obtained from
and reduce the need to calibrate the model for calibrated and validated simulations in GTPower [14].
dependencies already captured in the laminar burning The simulation data was also used to determine suitable
velocity correlations. The influence of engine speed and crank angle intervals for cylinder pressure referencing
spark timing is modeled as functions for relative change against intake pressure.
as in [8][9][10]. No correlations for ignition delay time are
provided since this is captured in the combustion mode CALCULATION OF HEAT RELEASE - A first law single
parameter m in the Wiebe function. zone thermodynamic analysis [5] was used to calculate
heat release from the pressure data. Heat transfer
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD according to Woschni and temperature dependent ratio
of specific heats was used in the calculations. The
Experiments were performed on a modified 4-cylinder cylinder charge temperature at inlet valve closing was
turbocharged SI-engine with engine specifications estimated as the mass averaged temperature of the inlet
according to Table 1. The engine is described in more gases and trapped exhaust gases. The trapped exhaust
detail in [14]. Due to the engine design, very low residual gas temperature at inlet pressure conditions, T*exh, was
calculated by assuming an isentropic state change from
exhaust pressure and temperature to inlet pressure:
3
T = (1 − x rg ) ⋅ Tint + x rg ⋅ Texh
* data, the region used for fitting a straight line and the
fitted line. Ordinary least squares fit of the straight line
γ −1 gives extra weight to the late part of combustion, since
(10)
⎛ p ⎞ γ
the transformation of the crank angle is nonlinear. This
*
Texh = Texh ⎜⎜ int ⎟⎟ should be desirable in simulation of knock with the
⎝ pexh ⎠ Livengood-Wu integral, Equation 1, since the late part of
combustion influences the integral value the most due to
where xrg is residual gas mass fraction obtained from very short ignition delay at high temperature.
simulation.
Figure 2 shows the same data as in Figure 1 as a
WIEBE PARAMETER ESTIMATION - Several methods function of crank angle. The error between experimental
for estimating Wiebe parameters from measured data and estimated normalized heat release is within 2%,
have been suggested in the literature. Wiebe [7] which was found to be a typical value for the data
suggests a transformation by rearranging and taking the presented in this work.
natural logarithm of the Wiebe function, Equation 5,
twice. This yields: Start of combustion θ0 was chosen as the spark timing in
⎛ ln (1 − xb (θ )) ⎞
the transformation Equation 11. By using the spark
ln⎜ ⎟ = (m + 1) ⋅ (ln (θ − θ 0 ) − ln (∆θ )) timing as start of combustion in the Wiebe function, the
⎝ ln 0.001 ⎠ need for additional correlations of ignition delay is
(11) omitted. The ignition delay is well captured in the
combustion mode parameter m for the data examined. A
from which the combustion mode parameter m can be longer ignition delay is reflected in a larger identified
determined as the slope and the total burn duration ∆θ value of m.
as the intersection of the ordinate axis of the
transformed normalized accumulated heat release. The The influence of start and end of transformed heat
crank angle of start of combustion θ0 has to be known to release data straight line fit was examined in detail. In
uniquely determine m and ∆θ. To resolve this ambiguity, the crank angle ranges where the burn rate is low, the
Csallner [8] compared the calculated cumulative heat calculated heat release is more sensitive to disturbances
release in a crank angle interval with high burn rate with and other errors. Therefore, it should be beneficial to the
the Wiebe function to get the same fuel mass burned in quality of the heat release regression if only the central
that interval. m was then adjusted to improve the fit. Witt part of the heat release is used to fit the Wiebe function.
[9] used existing software to determine total burn Nonlinear least squares was used to find the optimal
duration ∆θ and combustion mode parameter m to limits in terms of cumulative normalized heat release xb,
minimize the error between identified and calculated with the target being to minimize the error between the
heat release. The start of combustion was determined measured and estimated heat release over the entire
as 2% of the maximum heat release rate in [9]. combustion event. Heat release data from 100 operation
conditions with 200 recorded cycles for each of the four
The Wiebe function fitting method used in this work is cylinders was used. The optimal range was determined
the double logarithm method suggested by Wiebe [7]. individually for each operating condition and each
Figure 1 shows an example of transformed heat release cylinder, as seen in Figure 3. The average optimal range
for fitting the straight line was determined as xb = 0,15 to
0,93.
Crank angle [aTDC]
4.6 17.6 39.1 74.5
2
Measured
1,000
Wiebe estimate
1.0 Measured 2%
Transformed heat release
0,921
0.8 1%
heat release
heat release
-2 0.607
Model error
0.6 0%
0,291
0.940
experiments methodology is a good help in finding test
points that span the entire experimental range. One at a
0.935
time tests, as the tests described above, might miss
interaction effects between operating parameters.
0.930 However, the aim was not to make a response surface
model in several variables, but rather to get a suitable
0.925 validation data set.
0.920
Cylinder pressures were recorded for 200 engine cycles
0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 at each operating condition to assure accurate estimates
of averages in the presence of cyclic dispersion. Heat
xb at start of regression
release and Wiebe parameters were determined for
Figure 3 Optimal range for fitting a straight line to transformed heat each cycle individually. The Wiebe estimation could be
release data determined for 100 operating conditions. automated thanks to the choice of parameter estimation
method described above.
EXPERIMENTS - Engine experiments were conducted
to determine the influences of various operating PARAMETER VARIATION RESULTS
conditions on the Wiebe function parameters. The
parameters and ranges of variation are shown in Table The results from varying the operating parameters one
2. The operating parameters are grouped according to at a time are shown in Figure 4. The operating
their expected primary way of influencing the Wiebe parameters that have large influence on the Wiebe
parameters. Temperature, pressure, mixture strength parameters can be distinguished in the figure. λ, residual
and residual gas content have been shown to have an gas fraction, spark timing and engine speed influence
influence on laminar burning velocity. Engine speed the combustion duration ∆θ and combustion mode
influences the level of turbulence. Spark timing will affect parameter m strongly. Intake air temperature and intake
the gas properties during combustion and also the pressure has a small influence in the ranges of
turbulent burning velocity since turbulence varies on a variations selected. It is also noticeable that ∆θ and m
crank angle basis. The parameters were varied one at seem to be negatively correlated – high values of ∆θ are
the time to be able to easily distinguish the individual associated with low values of m.
influence of each parameter, as described in Equation 8.
The tests were performed with open throttle and low to 70 4.8
moderate boost pressure. The ranges for each 70 4.4
parameter was chosen to reflect probable ranges of 65 4.6
∆θ [CA]
∆θ [CA]
operation of the actual engine at high load. In particular, 60 4.0
m
m
60 4.4
spark timing was chosen at or later than MBT timing. A
total of 40 different operating conditions were tested. 50 3.6 55 4.2
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
λ [-] EGR fraction [-]
Table 2 Base operating condition and range of variation of engine
parameters in tests. 60 4.15
56 4.3
∆θ [CA]
∆θ [CA]
Base Range 58
m
m
operating of 55 4.2
Engine parameter condition variation 56 4.10
Gas properties related parameters 110 120 130 140 30 40 50
λ 1,0 0,85..1,14 Intake pressure [kPa] Intake temperature [°C]
EGR [%] 0 0..5,5 70
Intake air temperature [°C] 34 29..54 70 4.8
4.2
Intake pressure [kPa] 128 112..143 60
∆θ [CA]
∆θ [CA]
60 4.2
Turbulence related parameters 4.0
m
5
TOTAL BURN DURATION - As mentioned before, 1
G SL =
S L (λ , Tspark , p spark , x rg )
several correlations of burn durations to operating (13)
conditions exist. In these correlations the influence of
operating conditions are correlated one at a time to
measured combustion data. Choices of functional form, G S
i.e. linear fit, polynomial fit etc., are made to best fit the ∆θˆSL = ∆θ 0 ⋅ SL = ∆θ 0 ⋅ L ,0 (14)
data. The correlations are valid within the range where GSL , 0 SL
data was available. It would be desirable to increase the
generality of the correlations in some way. One way Figure 5 to Figure 8 show the predicted total burn
could be to use existing correlations of laminar burning duration when using values found in Heywood [5] for the
velocity SL as a function of gas composition and gas constants in the laminar burning velocity Equations 3
properties to describe the variations. The resulting and 4. The laminar burning velocity calculated at the
model would have the form: spark crank angle is not automatically representative for
the average laminar burning velocity during the entire
∆θˆ = ∆θ0 g (S L )g (spark )g (speed ) (12) flame propagation. Nor is it representative for the
turbulent burning velocity. It was found that decreased
Laminar burning velocity - Examining total burn duration temperature and pressure dependence in the expression
∆θ as a function of λ in Figure 4 reveals that rich mixture for laminar burning velocity decreased the error in
gives the shortest burn durations. One explanation for predicted total burn duration. The temperature and
this would be that laminar burning velocity of gasoline pressure dependence of laminar burning velocity was
has its peak value for rich mixtures giving short burn changed by optimizing the constant terms in αg and βg in
duration. The same reasoning holds for residual gas Equation 4 to minimize the prediction error in both the
fraction and temperature influence. Increased residual one factor at a time tests and the factorial design tests.
gas content leads to decreased laminar burning velocity
and increased burn duration. Increased intake α g ,opt = 1,3 − 0,271φ 3,51
temperature leads to increased combustion temperature (15)
and increased laminar burning velocity. The effect of β g , opt = −0,15 + 0,141φ 2, 77
varying the intake pressure seems to be almost
negligible in Figure 4. Total burn duration seems to be Laminar burning velocity with the new constants in
proportional to the inverse of laminar burning velocity. temperature and pressure exponents is shown in
Appendix B.
Most of the variation in total burn duration can be
explained by using the relative change of inverse Spark timing – The spark timing influence on total burn
laminar burning velocity SL in gasoline from Equations 3 duration is not captured in the laminar burning velocity
and 4. The describing function G in the expression for correlations. The gas temperature at spark crank angle
relative influence of operating condition on burn duration will be colder for advanced spark position resulting in a
is found below. The temperature and pressure at spark lower predicted laminar burning velocity. As mentioned
timing was used to calculate laminar burning velocity for before, the spark timing was chosen later than MBT
the different operating conditions. timing. Advancing the spark in this operating region will
generally lead to shorter burn durations due
70
Predicted
70
65 standard SL
Predicted
60 Predicted Predicted 65 optimized SL
∆θ [CA]
optimized SL
∆θ [CA]
standard SL
55
Base operating 60
Measured
condition ∆θ0
50 Measured Base operating
condition ∆θ0
55
0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
λ EGR mole fraction
Figure 5 Measured and predicted total burn duration as a function of λ. Figure 6 Measured and predicted total burn duration as a function of
Predictions are based on laminar burning velocity SL at spark crank EGR mole fraction. Predictions are based on laminar burning velocity
angle. SL at spark crank angle.
6
58
Base operating 57
Measured
60 condition ∆θ0
56
Measured
55 Base operating
∆θ [CA]
∆θ [CA]
condition ∆θ0
54
55 Predicted Predicted
optimized SL 53 optimized SL
Predicted 52
standard SL Predicted
51 standard SL
50
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145
Intake temperature [°C] Intake pressure [kPa]
Figure 7 Measured and predicted total burn duration as a function of Figure 8 Measured and predicted total burn duration as a function of
intake temperature. Predictions are based on laminar burning velocity intake manifold pressure. Predictions are based on laminar burning
SL at spark crank angle. velocity SL at spark crank angle.
to faster pressure and temperature rise in the cylinder. The measured data in Figure 9 is the total burn duration.
The faster pressure rise for advanced sparks is due to The ignition delay time correlation in Witt is:
7
1.6
1.3 Csallner ∆θr+∆θign
estimate
1.2
1.4
measured
1.1
∆θ0g(SL)g(φspark)
∆θ0g(SL)
∆θ
∆θ
laminar burning velocity model, i.e.: influence and spark timing influence. The identified
model is shown in Figure 11 together with predictions
∆θ from the Witt correlation and Csallner correlation [8]. The
(18)
∆θ 0 g (S L ) new estimate for model parameters is:
55,5
The Witt models no longer fit the data well. A second G ( N [rpm ]) = 2,13 − (21)
degree polynomial dependence was selected for the N
data. A second order polynomial was chosen to avoid
degeneration for spark timings close to top dead and COMBUSTION MODE PARAMETER – Closer
also to capture the possibility of increasing total burn examination of the correlation between Wiebe function
duration at some point beyond MBT spark timing. The parameters reveal that m seems to be linearly
identified polynomial has its minimum at 29 CA bTDC, dependent on ∆θ for each engine speed tested. Figure
similar to the combined Witt model. 12 shows straight lines fitted to m(∆θ) at several engine
speeds. The slopes of these lines are nearly identical.
The identified polynomial for spark influence on total Plotting the intercept of the straight lines with the
combustion duration is: abscissa against engine speed, shown in bottom right of
Figure 12, indicate that m is also linearly dependent on
G (ϕ spark [bTDC]) = 1,60 − 0,053 ⋅ ϕ spark + 9,1 ⋅ 10 −4 ϕ spark
2
engine speed N. A least squares regression of m as a
(19) function of ∆θ and engine speed N yields the following
equation:
Engine speed – Combustion duration variation as a
m(∆θ , N ) = −0,0421 ⋅ ∆θ + 3,51 ⋅ 10 −4 ⋅ N + 5,71
function of engine speed is not captured by the laminar
burning velocity correlation. Engine speed affects (22)
turbulence in the cylinder during combustion. This calls
for a separate engine speed influence correlation, similar with overall R2 = 0,868. Equation 22 could be used
to the spark advance correlation described above. The directly as describing function H(∆θ,N) to calculate the
functional form of Witt [9] has been used as a basis for relative change h(∆θ,N) from the reference operating
the correlation, but a new set of parameters has been condition. Another approach would be to simply look at
identified. The influencing function for rapid burn the changes in ∆θ and N from the reference operating
duration according to Witt is: condition and calculate m as:
G ( N [rpm ]) = 1,355 −
18,49
(20)
( )
mˆ = m0 − 0,0421 ∆θˆ − ∆θ 0 + 3,51 ⋅ 10 −4 (N − N 0 )
N (23)
where N is the engine speed. Identification of new A summary of the correlations for ∆θ and m is found in
parameters were performed on data normalized by a Appendix C.
reference operating condition, laminar burning velocity
8
80
4.8 4.8
2500 rpm 3000 rpm
4.4 4.4 75
m
m
4.0 4.0
70
3.6 3.6
Predicted ∆θ [CA]
65
50 60 70 80 50 60 70 80
∆θ [CA] ∆θ [CA]
60
4.8 7.0
4000 rpm
4.4 55
m(∆θ = 0)
6.5
m
4.0
50
2000 rpm
3.6 1500 rpm
6.0 45
50 60 70 80 2000 3000 4000 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
∆θ [CA] Engine speed [rpm]
Figure 12 Straight lines fitted to m as a function of ∆θ at different
Measured ∆θ [CA]
speeds. Bottom right figure shows estimated intercepts of equal slope Figure 13 Predicted vs. measured total combustion duration in
m (∆θ) lines as a function of engine speed N. Dash-dotted lines show 2
validation data set. R = 0,96.
the model m (∆θ,N) for the different engine speeds.
4.8
VALIDATION OF COMBUSTION MODEL
0%
measured The need for calibration data for the combustion model
0.05 has been highly reduced by using existing laminar
burning velocity correlations to model relative change in
Heat release [CA ]
-1
10 900
the simulation engineer to examine the influence of
Cylinder pressure [MPa]
∆θ: +5%
m: -10%
m: +10% turbulence in the combustion chamber. The operating
0.5 800
parameter influences that are not captured by laminar
1/τ [ms ]
-1
11
exchange system for turbocharged SI engines; APPENDIX A - WIEBE PARAMETER
SAE technical paper series 2005-01-1150. TRANSFORMATIONS
[15] Elmqvist, C., Lindström, F., Ångström, H.-E.,
Grandin, B. and Kalghatgi, G.T.; Optimizing Engine Wiebe function parameters can easily be transformed to
Concepts by Using a Simple Model for Knock common heat release analysis output, e.g. 50% mass
Prediction; SAE Technical paper 2003-01-3123. fraction burned and 10-90% burn duration. The mass
[16] Ångström, H.-E.; Cylinder Pressure Indicating with fraction burned at any crank angle θ is determined by
Multiple Transducers, Accurate TDC-Evaluating, Equation 5 repeated below:
Zero Levels and Analyse of Mechanical Vibrations;
Conference paper, 3rd International Indicating ⎡ ⎛ θ − θ 0 ⎞ m +1 ⎤
Symposium, Mainz am Rhein, April 1998. x b (θ ) = 1 − exp ⎢− a⎜ ⎟ ⎥ (A.1)
⎢⎣ ⎝ ∆θ ⎠ ⎥⎦
CONTACT
The crank angle of any heat release fraction is found by
Fredrik Lindström, M.Sc. solving for θ. For example the crank angle of 50% mass
Mail: KTH Machine Design, Brinellvägen 83, fraction burned is:
SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden. m +1
E-mail: fredrikl@md.kth.se ⎛ θ −θ0 ⎞
Phone: +46 8 790 7867 ln(1 − xb (θ 50 )) = ln 0,001⋅ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ∆θ ⎠
1 (A.2)
DEFINITIONS, ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS
⎛ ln(1 − 0,5) ⎞ m+1
⇒ θ 50 = θ 0 + ⎜ ⎟ ∆θ
CA: Crank angle ⎝ ln 0,001 ⎠
aTDC: Crank angle after combustion top dead center Hence, the 10-90% burn duration is:
~ :
x Residual gas mole fraction Inversely, the Wiebe parameters can be determined
rg
from heat release output if the m parameter is known as:
m: Combustion mode parameter DUR
∆θ = 1 1
SL: Laminar burning velocity ⎛ ln(1 − 0,9) ⎞ m +1 ⎛ ln(1 − 0,1) ⎞ m +1
⎜ ⎟ −⎜ ⎟
λ: Air/fuel ratio ⎝ ln 0,001 ⎠ ⎝ ln 0,001 ⎠ (A.4)
1
12
APPENDIX B – LAMINAR BURNING VELOCITY λ = 0,8
30
modified
28 21 λ = 1,1
20
26 19 standard
18
24 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8
modified Pressure [MPa]
22
Figure 21 Laminar burning velocity as a function of pressure at 600 K
20 for standard correlation (Equations 3 and 4) and modified correlation
standard (Equations C.6 and C.7).
18
λ = 0,9
28
(C.4)
55,5
G N = 2,13 − (C.5)
N
The following expression for laminar burning velocity has
been used:
α g , opt β g , opt
⎛ p ⎞
⎛ T ⎞
S L = S L ,0 ⎜ u ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ (1 − 2,06~x )
0 , 77
rg
⎝ 298 ⎠ ⎝ 1,013 ⎠
(C.6)
13
With fuel specific constants for gasoline:
S L ,0 = Bm + Bφ (φ − φ m )
2
H ∆θˆ, N
mˆ = m0 ⋅ h∆θˆ , N = (C.8)
H ∆θ , N ,0
( )
mˆ = m0 − 0,0421 ∆θˆ − ∆θ 0 + 3,51 ⋅ 10 −4 (N − N 0 )
(C.10)
14