Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inflation is greatest concern for the developing country like India. Increase or
decrease in Inflation is depended on many factors like demand and supply of the essential
commodity, speculation in commodity exchange, and money supply in the economics.
Inflation is indirect tax that middle class people always have to pay. Inflation is indirect tax
in the sense of burden in the head of common people in term of abnormal price increase.
There are too many arguments that inflation is directly affected by the speculation in the
commodity exchange.
Our report is made up using secondary data i.e. historical data of inflation and
commodity prices. Our main source of data collection is Indian statistical organization and
various commodity exchanges across India. Research is done by finding correlation between
commodity prices and their contribution to inflation.
In many commodities, Commodity price and inflation are positively related and their
correlation is just around 0.99 while in some commodity correlation is less positively related
and correlation is just around 0.35.
Our analysis has certain weakness like uses only one statistical tools and other likes
problems in data collection and last but lot least time span is also three months which is too
low as far as subject of report is concern
1. INTRODUCTION
India, a commodity based economy where two-third of the one billion population
depends on agricultural commodities, surprisingly has an under developed commodity
market. Unlike the physical market, futures markets trades in commodity are largely used as
risk management (hedging) mechanism on either physical commodity itself or open positions
in commodity stock.
For instance, a jeweler can hedge his inventory against perceived short-term downturn
in gold prices by going short in the future markets.
The article aims at knowhow of the commodities market and how the commodities
traded on the exchange. The idea is to understand the importance of commodity derivatives
and learn about the market from Indian point of view. In fact it was one of the most vibrant
markets till early 70s. Its development and growth was shunted due to numerous restrictions
earlier. Now, with most of these restrictions being removed, there is tremendous potential for
growth of this market in the country.
1.1 COMMODITY:
A commodity may be defined as an article, a product or material that is bought and
sold. It can be classified as every kind of movable property, except Actionable Claims,
Money & Securities.
Commodities actually offer immense potential to become a separate asset class for
market-savvy investors, arbitrageurs and speculators. Retail investors, who claim to
understand the equity markets, may find commodities an unfathomable market. But
commodities are easy to understand as far as fundamentals of demand and supply are
concerned. Retail investors should understand the risks and advantages of trading in
commodities futures before taking a leap. Historically, pricing in commodities futures has
been less volatile compared with equity and bonds, thus providing an efficient portfolio
diversification option.
In fact, the size of the commodities markets in India is also quite significant. Of the
country's GDP of Rs 13, 20,730 crore (Rs 13,207.3 billion), commodities related (and
dependent) industries constitute about 58 per cent.
Currently, the various commodities across the country clock an annual turnover of Rs
1, 40,000 crore (Rs 1,400 billion). With the introduction of futures trading, the size of the
commodities market grows many folds here on.
1.1.a. COMMODITY MARKET:
Commodity market is an important constituent of the financial markets of any
country. It is the market where a wide range of products, viz., precious metals, base metals,
crude oil, energy and soft commodities like palm oil, coffee etc. are traded. It is important to
develop a vibrant, active and liquid commodity market. This would help investors hedge their
commodity risk, take speculative positions in commodities and exploit arbitrage opportunities
in the market.
Table: 1
3 Total Stock Market Turnover 1,374,405 (56) 3,745,507 (136) 4,160,702 (133.8)
I National Stock Exchange (a+b) 1,057,854 (43) 3,230,002 (117) 3,641,672 (117.1)
II Bombay Stock Exchange (a+b) 316,551 (13) 515,505 (18.7) 519,030 (16.7)
Note: Fig. in bracket represents percentage to GDP at market prices ( Rs. In crore)
MCX has also set up in joint venture the MCX Stock Exchange. Earlier spin-offs
from the company include the National Spot Exchange, an electronic spot exchange for
bullion and agricultural commodities, and National Bulk Handling Corporation (NBHC)
India's largest collateral management company which provides bulk storage and handling of
agricultural products.
The exchange's main competitor is National Commodity & Derivatives Exchange Ltd
Globally, MCX ranks no. 1 in silver, no. 2 in natural gas, no. 3 in crude oil and gold in
futures trading
MCX has several strategic alliances with leading exchanges across the globe
As of early 2010, the normal daily turnover of MCX was about US$ 6 to 8 billion
MCX now reaches out to about 800 cities and towns in India with the help of about
126,000 trading terminals
MCX COMDEX is India's first and only composite commodity futures price index
Type Private
Founded 2003
Headquarters Exchange Square, Suren Road, Chakala, Andheri (East), Mumbai, India
Website www.mcxindia.com
Website www.ncdex.com
The Indian experience in commodity futures market dates back to thousands of years.
References to such markets in India appear in Kautialya’s ‘Arthasastra’. The words, “Teji”,
“Mandi”, “Gali”, and “Phatak” have been commonly heard in Indian markets for centuries.
The first organized futures market was however established in 1875 under the aegis of
the Bombay Cotton Trade Association to trade in cotton contracts. Derivatives trading were
then spread to oilseeds, jute and food grains. The derivatives trading in India however did not
have uninterrupted legal approval. By the Second World War, i.e., between the 1920’s
&1940’s, futures trading in organized form had commenced in a number of commodities
such as – cotton, groundnut, groundnut oil, raw jute, jute goods, castor seed, wheat, rice,
sugar, precious metals like gold and silver. During the Second World War futures trading was
prohibited under Defense of India Rules.
After independence, the subject of futures trading was placed in the Union list, and
Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 was enacted. Futures trading in commodities
particularly, cotton, oilseeds and bullion, was at its peak during this period. However
following the scarcity in various commodities, futures trading in most commodities was
prohibited in mid-sixties. There was a time when trading was permitted only two minor
commodities, viz., pepper and turmeric.
Deregulation and liberalization following the forex crisis in early 1990s, also
triggered policy changes leading to re-introduction of futures trading in commodities in India.
The growing realization of imminent globalization under the WTO regime and non-
sustainability of the Government support to commodity sector led the Government to explore
the alternative of market-based mechanism, viz., futures markets, to protect the commodity
sector from price-volatility. In April, 1999 the Government took a landmark decision to
remove all the commodities from the restrictive list. Food-grains, pulses and bullion were not
exceptions.
The long spell of prohibition had stunted growth and modernization of the surviving
traditional commodity exchanges. Therefore, along with liberalization of commodity futures,
the Government initiated steps to cajole and incentives the existing Exchanges to modernize
their systems and structures. Faced with the grudging reluctance to modernize and slow pace
of introduction of fair and transparent structures by the existing Exchanges, Government
allowed setting up of new modern, demutualised Nation-wide Multi-commodity Exchanges
with investment support by public and private institutions. National Multi Commodity
Exchange of India Ltd. (NMCE) was the first such exchange to be granted permanent
recognition by the Government
NATIONAL BOARD OF TRADE LIMITED (NBOT):
MISSION
To achieve high distinction in integrity for pricing, risk management and investment
to build an internationally acclaimed innovative Commodity Exchange in India.
OBJECT
Futures Exchange helps to achieve dual economic purpose: Price Discovery &
Risk-Management.
Volume(in
Financial Years Value(Rs. in lakh)
MT)
2000-01 1744860 422899.77
2001-02 2527235 724673.11
2002-03 9106500 3437638.20
2003-04 13154449 5301386.50
2004-05 14091715 5846284.00
2005-06 14549785 5341342.80
2006-07 17383567 7526280.35
2007-08 17950495 9509034.71
1.2. Inflation
1.2.a. History:
Increases in the quantity of money or in the overall money supply (or debasement of
the means of exchange) have occurred in many different societies throughout history,
changing with different forms of money used. For instance, when gold was used as currency,
the government could collect gold coins, melt them down, mix them with other metals such
as silver, copper or lead, and reissue them at the same nominal value. By diluting the gold
with other metals, the government could issue more coins without also needing to increase
the amount of gold used to make them. When the cost of each coin is lowered in this way, the
government profits from an increase in seignior age. This practice would increase the money
supply but at the same time the relative value of each coin would be lowered. As the relative
value of the coins becomes less, consumers would need to give more coins in exchange for
the same goods and services as before.
Historically, infusions of gold or silver into an economy have also led to inflation.
From the second half of the 15th century to the first half of the 17th, Western
Europe experienced a major inflationary cycle referred to as the "price revolution", with
prices on average rising perhaps six fold over 150 years. This was largely caused by the
sudden influx of gold and silver from the New World into Habsburg Spain. The silver spread
throughout a previously cash starved Europe, and caused widespread inflation. Demographic
factors also contributed to upward pressure on prices, with European population growth after
depopulation caused by the Black Death pandemic.
By the nineteenth century, economists categorized three separate factors that cause a
rise or fall in the price of goods: a change in the value or resource costs of the good, a change
in the price of money which then was usually a fluctuation in the commodity price of the
metallic content in the currency, and currency depreciation resulting from an increased
supply of currency relative to the quantity of redeemable metal backing the currency.
Following the proliferation of private bank note currency printed during the American Civil
War, the term "inflation" started to appear as a direct reference to the currency
depreciation that occurred as the quantity of redeemable bank notes outstripped the quantity
of metal available for their redemption. The term inflation then referred to the devaluation of
the currency, and not to a rise in the price of goods.
The adoption of fiat currency (paper money) by many countries, from the 18th
century onwards, made much larger variations in the supply of money possible. Since then,
huge increases in the supply of paper money have taken place in a number of countries,
producing hyperinflations-- episodes of extreme inflation rates much higher than those
observed in earlier periods of commodity money. The hyperinflation suffered by the Weimar
Republic of Germany is a notable example.
Inflation is usually estimated by calculating the inflation rate of a price index, usually
the Consumer Price Index. The Consumer Price Index measures prices of a selection of goods
and services purchased by a "typical consumer". The inflation rate is the percentage rate of
change of a price index over time.
For instance, in January 2007, the U.S. Consumer Price Index was 202.416, and in
January 2008 it was 211.080. The formula for calculating the annual percentage rate inflation
in the CPI over the course of 2007 is
The resulting inflation rate for the CPI in this one year period is 4.28%, meaning the
general level of prices for typical U.S. consumers rose by approximately four percent in
2007.
Other widely used price indices for calculating price inflation include the following:
Producer price indices (PPIs) which measures average changes in prices received by
domestic producers for their output. This differs from the CPI in that price
subsidization, profits, and taxes may cause the amount received by the producer to
differ from what the consumer paid. There is also typically a delay between an
increase in the PPI and any eventual increase in the CPI. Producer price index
measures the pressure being put on producers by the costs of their raw materials.
This could be "passed on" to consumers, or it could be absorbed by profits, or offset
by increasing productivity. In India and the United States, an earlier version of the
PPI was called the Wholesale Price Index.
Core price indices: because food and oil prices can change quickly due to changes in
supply and demand conditions in the food and oil markets, it can be difficult to
detect the long run trend in price levels when those prices are included. Therefore
most statistical agencies also report a measure of 'core inflation', which removes the
most volatile components (such as food and oil) from a broad price index like the
CPI. Because core inflation is less affected by short run supply and demand
conditions in specific markets, central banks rely on it to better measure the
inflationary impact of current monetary policy.
GDP deflator is a measure of the price of all the goods and services included
in Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The US Commerce Department publishes a
deflator series for US GDP, defined as its nominal GDP measure divided by its real
GDP measure.
Regional inflation The Bureau of Labor Statistics breaks down CPI-U calculations
down to different regions of the US.
The Commerce Ministry has released a new series of annual rate of inflation, based on
monthly Wholesale Price Index (WPI) , which stood at 8.51% for the month of August, 2010,
as compared to 9.78% for the previous month. The figure as per the old base year came in it
at around 9.5%, just in case you need a better understanding of the comparative parameters.
The base year against which the price rise is measured has been advanced by a decade
from 1993-94 to 2004-05. Moreover, the new WPI index will be more accurate and indicative
about the actual price movement, than the previous one – in a bid to produce more relevant
indicators of inflation based on modern consumption.
The new series would comprise of different weight-age levels, relative to the
changes in the economy over a period of time. For instance, the weight of manufactured
products would surge from 63.74% as per 1993-94 base price levels to 64.97% now. On the
other hand, the weight of primary articles in the new index would come down to 20.11% as
against 22.02 earlier. As such, the food prices would still comprise a big fifth of a in the WPI
index.
The new WPI series now measures a total of 676 items, an improvement by 241 items
from the previous list comprising of 435 items only. The basket of manufactured products has
surged from earlier 318 items to 555 items now. The list under primary article group has gone
up from 98 to 102.
The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion has also said that it would tinker
with the Services Price Index by the end of 2010-11 – for services such as banking and
finance and trade and transport. Other services which could be taken up at a later date could
include ports, aviation, telecom and post and telegraphy among others.
Interestingly, the new WPI index now also includes the more commonly used items
such as refrigerator, washing machine, microwave oven, computer and Television sets –
which have now turned into basic needs, from wants. In fact, even Consumer items widely
used by middle class such ice-cream, mineral water, readymade and instant food products,
canned meat, leather products, dish antenna and even precious metals like gold and silver
finds its place in the new index
Most of the major economies like US, UK, Japan, France, Singapore and even our arch
rival China have selected CPI as its official barometer to weigh its inflation. But our country,
India, is amongst few countries of the world, which selected WPI as its official scale to
measure the inflation in the economy.
The main difference between WPI and CPI is that wholesale price index measures
inflation at each stage of production while consumer price index measures inflation only at
final stage of production.
In last post we discussed about WPI, now let’s have a better understanding of CPI and
how it’s better from WPI:
Economists say that main problem with WPI is that more than 100 out of 435
commodities included in the index have abstained to be important from consumption point of
view. Take, for example, a commodity like coarse grains that go into making of livestock
feed. This commodity is insignificant, but continues to be considered while measuring
inflation.
WPI measures general level of price changes either at level of wholesaler or at the
producer and does not take into account the retail margins. Therefore we see here that WPI
does give the true picture of inflation.
In present day service sector plays a key role in Indian economy. Consumers are
spending loads of money on services like education and health. And these services are not
incorporated in calculation of WPI.
Moreover the inflation figure that we get on Friday hardly makes a difference to
consumers, as the commodities on which inflation is calculated are not part individual
consumer budget. Therefore in order to know what exact number of inflation is affecting your
budget, it is advisable you should do your own calculation. You can compare your
expenditure for previous years and with present scenario required to maintain your lifestyle
and you ill come to know that increase in expenditure would be a few times higher than the
official inflation figure.
But it is not easy for country like India to adopt to CPI , as in India, there are four
different types of CPI indices, and that makes switching over to the Index from WPI fairly
'risky and unwieldy’.
Apart from this official statements say that there is too much of lag in reporting of
CPI numbers, which makes it difficult for India to calculate inflation based on CPI figures.
India calculates inflation on weekly basis, whereas CPI figures are available on monthly
basis. So all this give little ground for Indian government to adopt CPI in calculating
inflation.
• General
An increase in the general level of prices implies a decrease in the purchasing power of
the currency. That is, when the general level of prices rises, each monetary unit buys fewer
goods and services. The effect of inflation is not distributed evenly in the economy, and as a
consequence there are hidden costs to some and benefits to others from this decrease in the
purchasing power of money. For example, with inflation, lenders or depositors who are paid a
fixed rate of interest on loans or deposits will lose purchasing power from their interest
earnings, while their borrowers benefit. Individuals or institutions with cash assets will
experience a decline in the purchasing power of their holdings. Increases in payments to
workers and pensioners often lag behind inflation, especially for those with fixed payments.
Increases in the price level (inflation) erode the real value of money (the functional
currency) and other items with an underlying monetary nature (e.g. loans and bonds).
However, inflation has no effect on the real value of non-monetary items, (e.g. goods and
commodities, gold, real estate).
Debtors who have debts with a fixed nominal rate of interest will see a reduction in the
"real" interest rate as the inflation rate rises. The “real” interest on a loan is the nominal rate
minus the inflation rate (approximately [31] ). For example if you take a loan where the stated
interest rate is 6% and the inflation rate is at 3%, the real interest rate that you are paying for
the loan is 3%. It would also hold true that if you had a loan at a fixed interest rate of 6% and
the inflation rate jumped to 20% you would have a real interest rate of -14%. Banks and other
lenders adjust for this inflation risk either by including an inflation premium in the costs of
lending the money by creating a higher initial stated interest rate or by setting the interest at a
variable rate. As the rate of inflation decreases, this has the opposite (negative) effect on
borrowers.
• Negative
High or unpredictable inflation rates are regarded as harmful to an overall economy. They
add inefficiencies in the market, and make it difficult for companies to budget or plan long-
term. Inflation can act as a drag on productivity as companies are forced to shift resources
away from products and services in order to focus on profit and losses from currency
inflation. Uncertainty about the future purchasing power of money discourages investment
and saving. And inflation can impose hidden tax increases, as inflated earnings push
taxpayers into higher income tax rates unless the tax brackets are indexed to inflation.
With high inflation, purchasing power is redistributed from those on fixed nominal
incomes, such as some pensioners whose pensions are not indexed to the price level, towards
those with variable incomes whose earnings may better keep pace with the inflation. This
redistribution of purchasing power will also occur between international trading partners.
Where fixed exchange rates are imposed, higher inflation in one economy than another will
cause the first economy's exports to become more expensive and affect the balance of trade.
There can also be negative impacts to trade from an increased instability in currency
exchange prices caused by unpredictable inflation.
Cost-push inflation
High inflation can prompt employees to demand rapid wage increases, to keep
up with consumer prices. In the cost-push theory of inflation, rising wages in turn can
help fuel inflation. In the case of collective bargaining, wage growth will be set as a
function of inflationary expectations, which will be higher when inflation is high. This
can cause a wage spiral. In a sense, inflation begets further inflationary expectations,
which beget further inflation
.
Hoarding
People buy durable and/or non-perishable commodities and other goods as
stores of wealth, to avoid the losses expected from the declining purchasing power of
money, creating shortages of the hoarded goods.
Hyperinflation
If inflation gets totally out of control (in the upward direction), it can grossly
interfere with the normal workings of the economy, hurting its ability to supply
goods. Hyperinflation can lead to the abandonment of the use of the country's
currency, leading to the inefficiencies of barter.
A locative efficiency
A change in the supply or demand for a good will normally cause its relative
price to change, signaling to buyers and sellers that they should re-allocate resources
in response to the new market conditions. But when prices are constantly changing
due to inflation, price changes due to genuine relative price signals are difficult to
distinguish from price changes due to general inflation, so agents are slow to respond
to them. The result is a loss of allocative efficiency.
Menu costs
With high inflation, firms must change their prices often in order to keep up
with economy-wide changes. But often changing prices is itself a costly activity
whether explicitly, as with the need to print new menus, or implicitly.
Business cycles
According to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, inflation sets off the
business cycle. Austrian economists hold this to be the most damaging effect of
inflation. According to Austrian theory, artificially low interest rates and the
associated increase in the money supply lead to reckless, speculative borrowing,
resulting in clusters of mall investments, which eventually have to be liquidated as
they become unsustainable.
• Positive:
Labor-market adjustments
Keynesians believe that nominal wages are slow to adjust downwards. This
can lead to prolonged disequilibrium and high unemployment in the labor market.
Since inflation would lower the real wage if nominal wages are kept constant,
Keynesians argue that some inflation is good for the economy, as it would allow labor
markets to reach equilibrium faster.
Room to maneuver
The primary tools for controlling the money supply are the ability to set the
discount rate, the rate at which banks can borrow from the central bank, and open
market operations which are the central bank's interventions into the bonds market
with the aim of affecting the nominal interest rate. If an economy finds itself in a
recession with already low, or even zero, nominal interest rates, then the bank cannot
cut these rates further in order to stimulate the economy - this situation is known as
a liquidity trap. A moderate level of inflation tends to ensure that nominal interest
rates stay sufficiently above zero so that if the need arises the bank can cut the
nominal interest rate.
Mundell-Tobin effect
The Nobel laureate Robert Mundell noted that moderate inflation would
induce savers to substitute lending for some money holding as a means to finance
future spending. That substitution would cause market clearing real interest rates to
fall. The lower real rate of interest would induce more borrowing to finance
investment. In a similar vein, Nobel laureate James Tobin noted that such inflation
would cause businesses to substitute investment in physical capital (plant, equipment,
and inventories) for money balances in their asset portfolios. That substitution would
mean choosing the making of investments with lower rates of real return. (The rates
of return are lower because the investments with higher rates of return were already
being made before. The two related effects are known as the Mundell-Tobin effect.
Unless the economy is already overinvesting according to models of economic growth
theory, that extra investment resulting from the effect would be seen as positive.
➢ Monetary policy
Today the primary tool for controlling inflation is monetary policy. Most central
banks are tasked with keeping the federal funds lending rate at a low level, normally to a
target rate around 2% to 3% per annum, and within a targeted low inflation range, somewhere
from about 2% to 6% per annum. A low positive inflation is usually targeted, as deflationary
conditions are seen as dangerous for the health of the economy.
There are a number of methods that have been suggested to control inflation. Central
banks such as the U.S. Federal Reserve can affect inflation to a significant extent through
setting interest rates and through other operations. High interest rates and slow growth of the
money supply are the traditional ways through which central banks fight or prevent inflation,
though they have different approaches. For instance, some follow a symmetrical inflation
target while others only control inflation when it rises above a target, whether express or
implied.
Monetarists emphasize keeping the growth rate of money steady, and using monetary
policy to control inflation (increasing interest rates, slowing the rise in the money supply).
Keynesians emphasize reducing aggregate demand during economic expansions and
increasing demand during recessions to keep inflation stable. Control of aggregate demand
can be achieved using both monetary policy and fiscal policy(increased taxation or reduced
government spending to reduce demand).
Under the Bretton Woods agreement, most countries around the world had currencies
that were fixed to the US dollar. This limited inflation in those countries, but also exposed
them to the danger of speculative attacks. After the Bretton Woods agreement broke down in
the early 1970s, countries gradually turned to floating exchange rates. However, in the later
part of the 20th century, some countries reverted to a fixed exchange rate as part of an
attempt to control inflation. This policy of using a fixed exchange rate to control inflation was
used in many countries in South America in the later part of the 20th century (e.g. Argentina
(1991-2002), Bolivia, Brazil, and Chile).
➢ Gold Standard
The gold standard was partially abandoned via the international adoption of
the Bretton Woods System. Under this system all other major currencies were tied at fixed
rates to the dollar, which itself was tied to gold at the rate of $35 per ounce. The Bretton
Woods system broke down in 1971, causing most countries to switch to fiat money – money
backed only by the laws of the country.
Economies based on the gold standard rarely experience inflation above 2 percent
annually. Under a gold standard, the long term rate of inflation (or deflation) would be
determined by the growth rate of the supply of gold relative to total output. Critics argue that
this will cause arbitrary fluctuations in the inflation rate, and that monetary policy would
essentially be determined by gold mining, which some believe contributed to the Great
Depression.
In general wage and price controls are regarded as a temporary and exceptional measure, only
effective when coupled with policies designed to reduce the underlying causes of inflation
during the wage and price control regime, for example, winning the war being fought. They
often have perverse effects, due to the distorted signals they send to the market. Artificially
low prices often cause rationing and shortages and discourage future investment, resulting in
yet further shortages. The usual economic analysis is that any product or service that is under-
priced is over consumed. For example, if the official price of bread is too low, there will be
too little bread at official prices, and too little investment in bread making by the market to
satisfy future needs, thereby exacerbating the problem in the long term.
Temporary controls may complement a recession as a way to fight inflation: the controls
make the recession more efficient as a way to fight inflation (reducing the need to
increase unemployment), while the recession prevents the kinds of distortions that controls
cause when demand is high. However, in general the advice of economists is not to impose
price controls but to liberalize prices by assuming that the economy will adjust and abandon
unprofitable economic activity. The lower activity will place fewer demands on whatever
commodities were driving inflation, whether labor or resources, and inflation will fall with
total economic output. This often produces a severe recession, as productive capacity is
reallocated and is thus often very unpopular with the people whose livelihoods are destroyed
(see creative destruction).
The real purchasing-power of fixed payments is eroded by inflation unless they are inflation-
adjusted to keep their real values constant. In many countries, employment contracts, pension
benefits, and government entitlements (such as social security) are tied to a cost-of-living
index, typically to the consumer price index.[59] A cost-of-living allowance (COLA) adjusts
salaries based on changes in a cost-of-living index. Salaries are typically adjusted annually in
low inflation economies. During hyperinflation they are adjusted more often. [59] They may
also be tied to a cost-of-living index that varies by geographic location if the employee
moves.
Problem Statement:
• To find out the correlation between inflation and price of commodity in commodity
exchange
Purpose of Study:
4. Limitation of Study:
• Time period is only 4 month
• Only selected commodity used rather than all commodity that comprises in inflation
basket.
• Inconsistency of the data because in some commodity historical spot rate is used
while in other historical future rate of commodity used
5. ANALYSIS
Commodity: Sugar
Sugar Trend in
Year Inflation-X price Sugar Price-Y XY X2 Y2
2004 97.70 1650.10 100.00 9770.00 9545.29 10000.00
2005 107.90 1837.68 111.37 12016.59 11642.41 12402.79
2006 112.90 1934.30 117.22 13234.50 12746.41 13741.28
2007 94.90 1498.60 90.82 8618.70 9006.01 8248.04
2008 101.00 1735.30 105.16 10621.50 10201.00 11059.32
2009 149.20 2708.92 164.17 24493.72 22260.64 26950.81
2010 170.40 3087.50 187.11 31883.52 29036.16 35010.10
Total 834.00 14452.40 875.85 110638.52 104437.92 117412.35
n ( ∑ xy ) − ( ∑ x ) ( ∑ y )
r=
n ( ∑x ) −( ∑ x)
2 2
n ( ∑ y ) − (∑ y )
2 2
r = 0.9979
Where,
n = No. of years
Σxy= Summation of Product of X And Y
Σy= Summation of prices of Commodity
Σx= Summation of Inflation
Σx2= Summation of square of inflation
Σy2= Summation of square of commodity price
From the above diagram, we can say that inflation and sugar price are going in
hand in hand from 2004 to 2010. Percentage increase in inflation is 70% while increase in
price is 87% from 2004 to 2010. Correlation between these is 0.9979.It shows that Inflation
and price of sugar in commodity exchange are positively correlated. So speculation in
commodity directly affects inflation.
Commodity: Gold
Trend in Gold
Year Inflation-X Price of Gold price-Y XY X2 Y2
2004 100.44 6116.11 100.00 10044.44 10089.09 10000.00
2005 102.27 6385.17 104.40 10676.56 10458.47 10899.19
2006 142.84 8904.17 145.59 20795.68 20403.74 21195.14
2007 150.07 9277.17 151.68 22762.74 22520.00 23008.08
2008 188.08 12072.67 197.39 37124.37 35372.21 38963.33
2009 228.30 15495.30 253.35 57840.31 52120.89 64187.34
2010 275.78 18547.00 303.25 83628.30 76051.85 91959.54
Total 1187.77 76797.59 1255.66 242872.40 227016.25 260212.63
From the above diagram, we can say that inflation and gold price are going in
hand in hand from 2004 to 2010. Percentage increase in inflation is 175% while increase in
price is 200% from 2004 to 2010. Correlation between these is 0.9987.It shows that Inflation
and price of gold in commodity exchange are positively correlated. So speculation in
commodity directly affects inflation.
Commodity: Silver
Trend in Silver
Year Inflation-X Silver price Price-Y XY X2 Y2
2004 100.3 10446.33 100.00 10034.44 10069.01 10000.00
10675.876
2005 101.0 10793.58 103.32 10436.60 10202.68 7
27537.481
2006 155.1 17335.08 165.94 25743.48 24066.35 5
31613.708
2007 171.8 18573.83 177.80 30552.39 29526.69 9
41913.309
2008 192.9 21386.50 204.73 39488.50 37203.98 1
52317.891
2009 202.0 23894.00 228.73 46213.20 40820.84 9
95989.502
2010 283.8 32365.00 309.82 87919.66 80528.25 4
232417.8 270047.77
Total 1207.0 1290.35 250388.27 0 1
In the above diagram, we can say that inflation and silver price are going in hand in
hand from 2004 to 2010. Both shows increasing trend during these period. Percentage
increase in inflation is 183% while increase in price is 209% from 2004 to 2010. Correlation
between these is 0.9975.It shows that Inflation and price of silver in commodity exchange are
positively correlated. So speculation in commodity directly affects inflation.
Commodity: Wheat
Trend in
Wheat Price-
Year Inflation-X Wheat Y XY X2 Y2
2004 100.0 7.81 100.00 9997.78 9995.56 10000.00
2005 100.8 7.74 99.10 9993.78 10169.04 9821.55
2006 121.3 9.43 120.74 14641.05 14703.58 14578.78
2007 132.8 10.7 137.00 18199.82 17646.91 18770.05
2008 144.5 11.5 147.25 21272.30 20870.62 21681.71
2009 159.8 12.27 157.11 25097.73 25520.06 24682.38
2010 171.9 12.45 159.41 27408.07 29561.07 25411.87
Total 931.1 920.61 126610.53 128466.84 124946.35
In the above diagram, we can say that inflation and wheat price are showing
increasing trend till 2006 but after that it is slightly volatile. Percentage increase in inflation is
71% while increase in price is 59% from 2004 to 2010. Correlation between these is 0.9831.
It shows that Inflation and price of wheat in commodity exchange are positively correlated.
So speculation in commodity directly affects inflation.
Commodity: Aluminum
Trend of
Aluminum
Year Inflation Aluminum Price XY X2 Y2
2005 105.1 97.45 100 10508.3333 11042.51 10000.00
2006 122.2 124.95 128.2 15665.2296 14926.73 16440.2658
2007 124.8 114.98 118.0 14729.9075 15585.44 13921.3362
2008 128.7 109.23 112.1 14422.0215 16555.11 12563.7759
2009 120.4 88.7 91.0 10961.9668 14504.19 8284.82907
2010 125.7 99.3821 102.0 12820.9198 15804.68 10400.4625
Total 726.9 651.3 79108.3786 88418.66 71610.6694
Above diagram shows that inflation is increase till 2008 but in 2009 it decline and in
2010 it slightly increase. While the aluminum price are showing declining trend during 2006
to 2009 but in 2010 it increasing. Percentage increase in inflation is 25% while increase in
price of aluminum is 2% from 2004 to 2010. Correlation between these is 0.3564. It shows
that Inflation and price of aluminum in commodity exchange are less positively correlated. So
speculation in commodity is not directly affected to inflation.
Above diagram shows that variation in crude price is very high compare to inflation
rate. Correlation between these is 0.82 due to the high speculation in crude price in 2007 and
2008. It shows that Inflation and price of Crude oil in commodity exchange are positively
correlated. So speculation in commodity is directly affected to inflation.
Above diagram shows that inflation and trend in agro index are same also
showing increasing trend except in 2008. Correlation between these is 0.077. It shows that
Inflation and Agro Index in commodity exchange are positively correlated but their co
relation is low. So speculation in commodity is slightly affected to inflation.
Commodity: Maize
Year Inflation Price of Maiz Trend in Maiz XY X2 Y2
2005 110.3 5.55 100.00 555.00 12167.93 10000.00
2006 118.6 5.20 93.69 487.21 14067.94 8778.51
2007 130.6 7.15 128.83 921.13 17049.83 16596.87
2008 136.0 8.55 154.05 1317.16 18496.00 23732.65
2009 151.0 8.75 157.66 1379.50 22793.45 24855.94
2010 161.3 8.90 160.36 1427.21 26020.38 25715.45
Total 807.8 794.59 6087.21 110595.52 109679.41
Above diagram shows that inflation is continuously increasing during this time span.
While the Maize price is showing declining trend in 2006 but after that it continuously
increasing till 2010. Percentage increase in inflation and Maize is same which is 60%.
Correlation between these is 0.9118. It shows that Inflation and price of Maize in commodity
exchange are positively correlated. So speculation in commodity is directly affected to
inflation.
In the above diagram, we can say that inflation and raw palm oil price are showing
zigzag trend. Correlation between these is 0.8261. It shows that Inflation and price of palm
oil in commodity exchange are positively correlated. But speculation in commodity directly
not affects inflation because percentage increase in inflation is 9% while increase in price is
48% from 2005 to 2010.
6. FINDINGS
➢ Sugar has been weighted at 1.73731 in inflation basket and correlation inflation and
prices of sugar is near to 1. So that they are positively related.
➢ Gold is weighted at 0.36 in inflation basket and percentage increase in inflation is
175.28 and increase in price is 203.25 from year 2004 to 2010.
➢ Silver has very less weigh at 0.01083 in inflation basket but correlation between
prices and inflation is near to .9975. which shows positive correlation.
➢ Row cotton is weigh at 0.70488 and increase in price is 91.12 and increase in inflation
is 63.7%. And correlation is comparatively low from above three commodities.
➢ Wheat has 1.11595 weights in inflation index. Correlation is 0.98310.
➢ Aluminum has weighed at 0.48921 and correlation is 0.36 which is second lowest
among all eleven commodities. Increase in price and inflation is very low.
➢ Crude oil has weighed at 9.36439 and it is positively correlated.
➢ Mcx Agro index has weighed at 14.33709 which is highest among all commodity and
correlation is near to zero.
➢ All the above findings are tabulated as below.
% % Increase in
Time Correlation Increase in commodity
Period Comodity Weight with Inflation Inflation price
2004-10 Sugar 1.73731 0.9979 70.4 87.11
2004-10 Gold 0.36 0.9987 175.28 203.25
2004-10 Silver 0.01083 0.9975 183.8 209.82
2004-10 Raw Cotton 0.70488 0.92900 63.7 91.12
2004-10 Wheat 1.11595 0.98310 71.9 59.4
2005-10 Aluminum 0.48921 0.36 25.7 2
2004-10 Crude Oil 9.36439 0.8287 51.7 90.35
2006-10 MCX Metal Index 10.74785 0.6671 32.9 43.7
2005-10 MCX Agro Index 14.33709 0.077 74.3 71.4
2005-10 Palm Oil 0.41999 0.8261 9.7 48.33
2005-10 Maize 0.21727 0.9118 61.3 60.36
7. CONCLUSION
Inflation is hurdle in the economic development it is priority of
the government to monitor and controlled using various economic
models. Inflation directly affects the purchasing power of every
people in the country. There are various factors that affect inflation
like supply side shortages, hoardings, speculation and other natural
calamities.
It is believe that commodity market is highly driven by
speculator by doing these speculative activities. Our analysis suggests
that correlation between inflation and price in commodity exchange is
around 0.9. From our above presumptions we can say that commodity
exchange directly affect the inflation so government has to take
controlling measures.
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Web Sites:
➢ www.rbi.org.in
➢ www.mosip.nic.in
➢ www.mcxindia.com
➢ www.ncdex.com
➢ www.nmce.com
➢ www.wikipedia.org
Articles: