You are on page 1of 61

Love Can Open Prison Doors

By
Starr Daily

THE LAST EXPERIMENT

CHAPTER 1

Except for idiocy and other conditions of mental invalidism, personal failure is
indefensible. The failure is his own indictment and conviction.
During the last two years I have interviewed more than three hundred men and
women who have openly admitted they were abject failures in life. In each case I
have asked, Why? And in every instance the answer has been in the character of
an alibi. But in no case has the failure laid the blame for defeat at his or her own
door.
In my own experience and in the cases of all others I have found this to be an
inescapable truth: that when a man offers an excuse, an alibi for himself, or in any
way lays the blame for his weakness, conditions, or failures on some one or some
thing outside himself, he is invariably wrong, and in nine cases out of ten he is a
weakling and a coward who is roundly condemned by his own spirit.
His alibis may and generally do enlist the sympathy of those upon whom they are
practiced. But if he is a normal human being, there is one person who will not
accept his offering, and that is the person who is his real self. Mild of manner, easy-
going, and infinitely patient, this real person, who dwells silently within him, listens
to his excuses and then whispers softly, You must tell it to your friend George: but
not to me.
If you insist, this quiet man within will begin to shame you with a long string of apt
comparisons. He will point out those who have less advantage and native ability,
but who are successful. He will take you into the bedrooms of the ill and
incapacitated and let you observe courage at work in the service of humanity. He
will present you with a long list of names in the huge book of political, industrial,
artistic, cultural, civic, religious, and scientific life. Then he will tell you how many
of these were practically illiterate, inarticulate, friendless, without direction,
influence, or prestige but took advantage of opportunities that have swirled
unnoticed about you all your life.
This inner man once spoke to a friend through Thomas Edison. The great inventor
and his friend were walking along a city street. The friend wanted to know if it were
not very difficult to succeed in this high-speed world of terrific competition. Mr.
Edison's eyes directed the gaze of his friend to a ragged, prematurely old man on
whose bent shoulders lay a large sack of junk. Then he answered: Yes; but it is
more difficult to fail.
On a day in the spring of 1930 I sat in the cell of a fellow convict. As I had done, he
had wasted the best years of his life behind prison bars. He was telling me that he
was sick and tired of prison bells, profitless labor, and convict hash. But at forty it
was too late to think of turning Honest John.
I inquired into his particular brand of reasons for failure , because all criminals are
failures, whether they be big protected ones who never see prison, or little
unprotected ones who rarely see anything else. He had figured it all out and
possessed an alibi as iron-clad as the cell door behind which we sat. He could trace
it all back to an unhappy instance in his childhood when a too stern father flailed
the hide off him because he wanted to see what made the wheels go around in the
family clock. Had his unimaginative dad been more appreciative of the genius
behind his destructive curiosity, he might now be a mechanical engineer instead of
a weary slave in the prison rock quarry.
I'm dressing out next month, I told him. And I'm never coming back.
Whatta ya think you're gonna do'? he asked, giving me a wise smile.
I learned the tricks of making dishonest money, was my reply, and to the degree I
succeeded I failed. Now I'm going to learn the art of earning an honest living. Isn't
that good logic?
He assured me that eighty per cent of the convicts were two, three, and four-time
losers, and that every one of them had made that same remark a thousand times.
But it don't mean anything, he added. It's just like the resolution a drunk makes on
the morning after. He's never gonna take another drink as long as he lives. But in a
couple o' hours he's all lit up again, an' everything looks Jake.
I insisted that mine was not an idle New Year's resolution. But what can you do? You
don't know how to work. When you go out you'll meet twenty million Honest Johns
who do know how, and who know all the ropes about getting jobs. They'll be your
competitors in the labor market. They're skilled workers; got good names an'
reputations. They can face employers with the best. But what have you to offer ?
Just a life of crime. A penitentiary pallor and a lock-step hitch in your gait. A fat
chance you'll have. At best I give you six months to try this bug-house notion. Just
long enough for the soup-line to stare you in the face. Then you'll wake up with a
bang and blast open the first safe you come across.
He did not understand that I had already wakened with a bang while lying half dead
in solitary confinement. There in a moment's time the folly of crime and the
stupidity of hatred appeared clear cut in my consciousness, and I got an authentic
glimpse of the greatest power in all the world, the power of love, which, when lived
with any measure of proficiency, could see you through any emergency, dissolve
your toughest problems, cause you to lives serenely, triumphantly, and successfully
at any time and in any place; that with love on your side as a philosophy of life
every obstacle and opposition could be discerned in its true light, as an opportunity
to call forth your power.
This was a magnificent vision, although I did have to get it through blind suffering.
It has sustained me in all the hard hours since I left the prison, and has turned
every difficulty into a glorious challenge and blessing.
After I had caught it, my powers of recollection were stimulated, and I wondered
how I could have been so blind as not to see that love and not hate was the real
power in this world.
Instantly I began to recall events in my past when the truth of love's power had
been made so plain that only a midnight soul could have failed to recognize it.
Now, looking back, I could see how the power of love had performed strange things
in my life.
I recalled a time when I was being held in jail on suspicion of burglary. For two days
and nights I had been subjected to third degree police methods in an effort to
torture a confession out of me. My head had been beaten with a rubber hose until it
resembled a huge stone bruise, swollen beyond human shape, my face black from
the congealed blood beneath the surface. Lighted cigars had been pressed against
my flesh. I had hung for three hours with my wrists handcuffed over a hot steam
pipe. My arms had been twisted behind me and my elbows beaten with black-jacks
until the bones felt crunchy. Heavy heels had ground my bare feet against a
concrete floor. On the third night of this I was about at the end of my endurance.
Again I was dragged into the torture room and sat down within the semi-circle of
twelve big detectives. My previous sustaining energy of hate and anger had
dwindled into a dull sense of indifference. I was alarmed at this new state of affairs.
For I had learned that pain could easily be assimilated if sufficient hatred could be
thrown against it. I did not want to weaken. Death was preferable. But could I stand
the pain without the sustaining force of hate?
You'd better open up and come clean, the Chief informed me. If you don't you're
gonna get the works. Y' understand?
I continued to sit in silence, expecting the worst, and wondering if I would be able
to take it.
All right, boys, said the Chief. Get busy. Let the rat have it.
It was the show down. Unless I broke, my life was not worth a dime. I knew this as
two of the detectives stepped towards me. Then a strange thing took place in my
consciousness. All hate and anger were gone. The vague sense of indifference
vanished. And in an unbidden instant there welled up within me an overwhelming
compassion for these men, for their pathetic ignorance, their undeveloped souls,
for the pitiful condition of their minds and hearts. And as this strange sentiment
reached a high peak of intensity within me the Chief spoke, and what he said
constituted a minor miracle.
Don't hit him again, he barked out. Take him back. I was returned to my cell, and
for the remainder of the night I was under the care of a doctor. The next morning I
was transferred to a private hospital, where I lived for three weeks. Every day a
number of women came to see me, bringing flowers and other gifts. It was all quite
mystifying, and the nurses' guarded explanations did not clarify the mystery. These
women were the wives of city detectives. I could not figure the thing out. I was only
a friendless, unprotected criminal. They had no reason to placate me with gifts and
attention because they feared what I might reveal. I was told not to worry about
anything, that all bills would be paid. Nor was I returned to the jail on being
discharged from the hospital. Instead I was given an envelope and told that I was
free to go. In the envelope was no word of explanation. Only five crisp, ten-dollar
bills.
It was not until twenty years later, twenty years filled with crime and punishment,
that I was able to see through this mystery, and to know the power, because of
which my life had been spared and this odd consideration shown me.
On another occasion when I was on the dealer's side of the table, I was an unseeing
witness to this transmuting power of love in action. I was robbing the safe in the
home of a priest. He surprised me in the act. From a stairway above me I heard his
unexpected voice: What are you doing there, my child?
I wheeled, my flashlight and gun on him. He was in a night robe and unarmed.
Stand where you are, I commanded sharply. I've got you covered.
I mean you no harm. His voice had a rare accent of kindliness and honor in it.
Slowly he began descending the steps.
Stop, or I'll drop you! I commanded him. With superb assurance he came on,
reached the bottom, and walked leisurely over to a light switch and pressed the
button. Turning to me, then, he said: Put your gun down, my child. I only want to
talk with you a little while.
Logically, of course, from my point of view, I was in a close place with the odds in
my favour. It was not sound criminal judgment for me to accede to his request. The
correct procedure under the circumstances would have been to tie him and gag
him, then to proceed with the business at hand.
What a singular thing for me to do! I obeyed him and sat in the chair he pointed
out. I say singular, because it was so illogical, unreasonable from the viewpoint of a
confirmed crimester-- and because, also, I listened to him while he talked to me
about God in a most singular way-- a way in which there seemed to be nothing
offensive to my God-hating mind. God might have been my own father, or an elder
brother, or a very close friend, anything but the fierce-eyed black-bearded monster
of wrath, anger, and fire I had heard so much about.
At two o'clock in the morning I accepted this priest's invitation, went with him into
the kitchen, and joined him in a cold bite. I left his home without taking his money.
He shook my hand and blessed me. I had no fear that when I was out of sight he
would exercise what the world calls duty and call the police. To this day I am sure
he never mentioned my nocturnal visit.
What was this strange power he possessed over me? He did this because his love
was genuine, not the romantic, sentimental emotion that men call love; but that
deep sense of compassionate being which was so eloquently expressed by the
Master when He said Neither do I condemn thee. Nothing less than love could have
caused me to act in a manner diametrically opposite to my habitual character as a
criminal.
You see, I am introducing you to my theme. I am telling you about a
power that resides in the hearts of men, which is a power greater than
any power ever to be discovered in the realm of natural science.
It is a power possessed by all, but recognized by few. It is the most
dynamic and readily accessible power in the universe of men. Every man
can contain and express this power. It is practical. And because it is
accessible to every man and because it is practical, I am perfectly safe in
making again the boldest statement ever made by another human being:
that, except by idiocy and other conditions of mental invalidism, failure is
indefensible.
Occasionally when a man has suffered enough he will accept this power
and use it. Sometimes his suffering is so great that the sheer intensity of
his need will awaken him to this power which is closer to him than breath,
and will heal him instantly. I call love the last experiment, because though
it is the closest and most fundamental thing in a person's life, it is the
last thing he will turn to for help when he is in distress.
In talking to you about love I shall not get mushy and sentimental. For love is
everything that sentimentalism is not. Love is power, while
sentimentalism is the misuse of power. In its practical application love is as
precise and scientific as mathematics. Without it there could be no universe, no cell
organization of any kind. Because love is the only integrating power in
existence. It is all that can establish order out of chaos or maintain order
in chaos.
Whenever it is recognized by man he likewise recognizes harmony. Love is never a
disintegrating force. Science deals with disintegrating natural forces; but wisdom
deals with the power of love. Natural forces lead to change: love to permanence.
Love simplifies life. All that is less than pure love complicates it. Love is
endurable, eternal. It is the one ultimate expression which can combine
and sustain all principles of the natural and spiritual worlds. Its
application releases the soul of man from the bondage of limitation. Love
is God in action. And the process of becoming the doctrine of love is to
grow into oneness with God.
The beautiful thing about the doctrine of love is that it casts out all fear,
all striving and struggling. You merely act and express the virtues and
qualities of love, and all that is needed to sustain you in happiness and
harmony are inevitable consequences of your action. You are attached to
nothing except the action of love. You desire no results; but possess
perfect assurance that the correct results necessary to your life at a
given time will be supplied. The sense of impending insecurity is unknown
to him who lives the doctrine of love.
With the light of love to guide us the idea of seeking God fades on the
film of our consciousness, and we know, then, that this idea, long held
and fostered by men, is as false as the beard of Hercules. It is God who is
doing the seeking. It is God who stands at our door and knocks. When we
consciously and deliberately set out to seek God, we are simply being annoyed by
God's seeking us. His incessant pounding on our door gets on our nerves, we try to
escape from the friction and irritation of it, and we call this seeking God. We go to
church, or the lecture hall, or drop a coin in the hand of a beggar, or we join a
charitable organization. And the more we seek the farther we drift from the real
consciousness of God's presence, for we stifle His voice and dull the sound of His
knocking. God is the Supreme Shepherd, and it must forever be the logical
procedure for the shepherd to seek his lost sheep, and not for the lost
sheep to seek him. When we are lost in the woods our sense of direction
is gone and we move about in fruitless circles. It is only when we cease
seeking our way and sit down and get quiet that we regain our poise and
balance sufficiently for intuition (the Spirit of God) to lead us out of our
dilemma.
Our job here is to learn to love. It is the only obligation man has in the
world. There is no other religion. And it is all the salvation possible. Any
service rendered in an effort to placate God is futile. If you think you can
serve God while at the same time you have in your mind you are serving
God, then you are separating yourself from God. Service to God is present
only when the thought of serving Him is absent. When you love the
service and think not of rewards or results, or that you are doing it for
God in return for His gifts, God will then draw nigh unto you.
The lover always question the correctness in any ethical or moral or philosophical
statement that has become platitudinous and hence meaningless. Consequently
when he hears the statement Serve God, he begins to analyze the correctness of
the statement. And he discovers it to be a meaningless platitude in its current
sense. For he knows that you can perform your charities, your prayers, and your
abnegations until doomsday without ever becoming aware of God's presence. But if
you really love God, and really serve because you love to serve, and you really pray
because you love to pray, then the statement, Serve God, is not a platitude. It has
meaning and salvation in it. And it is rewarded with the gift of God's grace. The
statements of Jesus have never degenerated into the category of moral platitudes,
because they are firmly rooted in the doctrine of love.
Now this being a very important point, as my book will increasingly endeavor to
show, let us dwell just a little longer on the subject. In God service and love are one
and the same thing. If we learn to love in the true sense we cannot help serving
God. But if, by our wills and misconceptions, we force ourselves to serve with the
mistaken notion we are serving God, or if in our service the motivating quality of
love is absent, then service and love are separated, and our service is
questionable; indeed, it is false and spurious. We must, therefore, learn to love first,
and having learned to love, all else is added as a natural consequence.
We begin with the tremendous truth that the only world duty and spiritual
obligation we have is to become love, that is, to learn to love and mean it.
Hence if this is our only obligation we begin by learning to love. We learn to love by
first practicing love. The more we practice the more we become conditioned to the
vibration of love. And in time, if we persist, we actually become a true lover of God
and the creatures and creations of God. When this time comes we can serve God,
and inevitably will serve Him, and our service will be genuine.
To illustrate this point an example may be employed. Suppose you have a very
dear friend. You do something to hurt or offend him. Thereafter something stands
between you and your friend. It is an invisible and nameless barrier, which you
want to remove. In seeking to remove it you try various ways to serve him. You
bring him gifts, or you seek to make influential contacts advantageous to him. In
other words, you seek to heal the world in his heart by means of compromise and
placation. But the barrier remains. All you do does not wipe away the
disappointment in his eyes.
So long as this disappointment is allowed to remain you are separated from your
friend, although you associate with him daily. While it remains you cannot serve
him effectively, because the server and the object of service are separated. So long
as this is so you cannot know how to serve him.
Finally you weary of your thankless efforts, and you go to your friend in a spirit of
humility and contrition, and you apologize for your wrong, and you ask him to
forgive and forget. The spirit within him meets the spirit within you. All hurt
vanishes from his face, to be replaced by a smile of genuine joy. Your old
relationship is instantly re-established. And now you can serve him. You bring him a
gift that is a gift of real love and affection. You do things for him because you love
to do it, and not because in doing it you desire to win back his friendship.
And so it is with God. When His Spirit has become your spirit, when you have
actually known Him by a deep inner experience of knowingness, you are capable of
serving Him in works, faith, and prayer. But to pray to God without loving God, or
without the capacity to love Him, is to render lip service to an unknown God, and
the only possible value in such a prayer must be psychological and not spiritual.
Finally when we have suffered and been defeated enough we shall turn to the last
experiment, we shall turn to love and begin to learn to love by practicing love. As
we become love we draw God to us; when we know God we cease all straining and
quietly lay our burdens in His lap, knowing that He knows best how to dispose of
them. But how do we begin the practice of love. Love is charity in the true sense of
that misused word, and charity begins at home. Hence we start the practice of love
first in our own homes. It is when we learn to love those nearest to us that we are
then able to love our neighbors, the citizens of our community, and finally of the
state and nation and the world. And then our love reaches out to embrace all
nature. With this accomplishment the Grand Passion is born full-blown in our hearts
and we love God with an affection that is holy. To love Him is not to seek Him
longer; but to accept Him who has long been seeking us.
Since writing this simple chronicle of love in action behind the bars of a modern
penitentiary, I have received several hundred letters from all parts of the world.
Some have been inspired by reading the book; a few have been repulsed. Many
have had their curiosity aroused. Others have found in it the information necessary
to effect salutary changes in their lives: they have regained lost health; have
solved their environmental and economic problems. All have asked questions
concerning statements which were either implied or lightly touched upon in the
context. And these questions are the most important features contained in the
letters received.
To ask has value. To decide upon the answer has greater value. To act
upon the decision is of supreme importance, whether the decision acted
upon be good, bad, or indifferent. It is better to keep busy with blunders
and mistakes, trials and errors than it is to sit with folded hands and a
heart filled with unexpressed and frustrated wishes.
The questions have called forth this introduction. Almost entirely these pages are
concerned with the deliberate and conscious application of the Law of Love to the
practical everyday problems of life. My readers have unerringly sensed the
power of love as being a power within their capacity to recognize and to
use. But they have wanted to know more about what love is, as well as how to use
it and what it does when used.
I make no claims of a last-word nature. Love can be defined on familiar levels of
consciousness. Beyond that it enters mystery and awaits our arrival in another
dimension.
The following statements we can comprehend:
We cannot escape love. If in the physical body we ceased to love for an instant we
should die. Hate is nothing more than an intense form of self love. It is a
twisting of God's love, causing it to operate negatively rather than positively,
destructively rather than constructively in the direction of our own best interests.
Because God loves, we love. Our love does not create that which was
before. Before our love, was God's love. It is His love which created our
love, and which supports, sustains, and expands it. We are partakers of
God's love. We act in the direction of those qualities of being which we
conceive to be of God. God's love is always creative. We are creative when
we express His love in action. As to what His love creates, through us, is a
matter of our own choice. To act in the direction of kindness, faith,
discrimination, gratitude, reverence, forgiveness, is to build the qualities of
constructive love into our personalities. To act in the direction of hate, doubt, in
discrimination, ingratitude, unforgivableness, is to build into our personalities the
destructive qualities of misused love.
As Robert E. Speer has pointed out in his work, Seeking the Mind of Christ: His
love is the power of our loving. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but
that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins. If
God so loved us we also ought to love one another. We love because He
first loved us. God's love did not begin when we began to love God. We
never would have loved either God or our brother had it not been for the
love of God. His love, whether we knew it or not, begat all our love. Our
love of God . . . is but letting Him love us. Our love is but a faint shadow
of His, a shadow that advances and retreats and quivers uncertainly. The
great and steadfast love of God is not the child of the shadow.
Unchanging, measureless, utterly forgiving, rich with the wealth of His
infinite nature, the love of God is beneath and above and about our weak
human love, and we can rest upon His love as the great certainty beyond
all our impulses.''

We swim in an infinite ocean of love. To become increasingly conscious of


our oneness with love, is the mark of exercising intelligent self interest.
To this end, we do not labor and strain in our search for love. It is above,
beneath, and about us. It is seeking us.
To respond is the secret. To exercise the capacities we have for love is to expand
our capacities for receiving and expressing love. Seeking love is to attempt to
define a love which we have not yet developed the capacity to express. How can
we understand the love of the Supreme Lover, except we approach His love
through the process of practice or of daily becoming? With only a modicum of His
capacity for love, how can we understand the things He did not do:

He might have built a palace at a word,


Who sometimes had not where to lay His head;
Time was, and He who nourished crowds with bread
Would not one meal unto Himself afford;
Twelve legions girded with angelic sword
Were at His beck, the scorned and buffeted;
He healed another's scratch, His own side bled,
Side, feet and hands with cruel piercings gored,
Oh, wonderful the wonders left undone!
And scarce less wonderful than those He wrought;
Oh, self restraint, passing all human thought,
To have all power, and be as having none;
Oh, self-denying love, which felt alone
For needs of others, never for its own.

This is the great love. We move toward it. In this high sense, love is all a bestowal,
a giving of ourselves with a discriminatory purpose-- that of moving in the right
direction. The very air we breathe is a bestowal of God's love to us. To become
aware of this fact is to be grateful for the grace which makes breathing possible,
and to become aware of love in the smallest degree is to partake of more of love's
inexhaustible supply. Our out-breath is a bestowal of love whose chemical qualities
support and sustain the lower forms in nature. To become consciously aware of
this unselfish process is the important thing for us, for increasing
awareness is the measure of expanding consciousness, and expanding
consciousness is the increasing capacity for receiving, containing, and
expressing the love which God has bestowed upon us.
This book, therefore, is an indication of a way. It points out the modus operandi
of one man who caught a glimpse of the love theme in the stillness of a dungeon
cell. Its keynote is response; its purpose is not definition, but inspiration.
To be inspired is to want to act. The book being true, it must inspire, to
cause the reader to want to act. How to begin to act and how to continue
to act; in a word, how consciously to apply the dynamic power of love to
the every day problems confronting the personality life-- this is or should
be the aim of any book dealing with personal experience of this kind.
One thing is certain, no man or woman can act in the direction of
bestowal unseen or unrewarded. Man acts and the Spirit observes.

LOVE VERSUS DUNGEON DOORS

CHAPTER II

When I say that love can open prison doors I mean that literally. When I say there
are doors n much stronger than the doors of a punitive prison, I mean that literally
also. But when I speak of this love I'm not referring to it in the usual Pollyanna
sense, as something to be hazily realized and half heartedly applied.
Love is a dynamic force in the world. It is the most powerful creative force
in existence, and it is responsible for nearly everything created by and
through man. Love for God, for charity, for service; love for money, for
power, for fame-- all or any one of these urges will drive men and women
to use the creative principle that sends them to the top of their
respective desires. But since all human desire is insatiable it is never fully
gratified. Creative progress is made in proportion as the driving love
medium behind ambition goads the goal-climber into action.
Love for debauchery, for crime, for the gratification of pigsty appetites send men
and women toward the bottom that represents the goal of their respective desires.
But again since human desire is insatiable, the gratification sought is never found.
Creative degradation is advanced in proportion as the love driving media for
degradation is used toward its end.
Behind the creation of an infant lies the contacting medium of love. And since that
love is human it produces a human being, and thus perpetuates the human race
with all its human desires and aspirations, its human follies and mistakes, its trials
and errors, its tragedies and humors, its enormous conceits and egotism that cause
it to survive through all the elemental cataclysms and plagues to which the earth is
heir.
Love for opinion makes saints and scoundrels, martyrs and tyrants out of men.
Love for publicity and notoriety makes heroes and dare-devils. Love for self creates
bigotry; for others, tolerance.
Always love is a medium through which man contacts and applies the creative
principle of the universe. And what love is allowed to create through man is up to
man himself. His love attitude determines the course taken by creative principle.
Inevitably, the creative principle operating on and through man, creates something;
something noble or ignoble, constructive or destructive.
The principle in itself is ultimate unity, and is therefore not subject to
finite discriminatory limitations. It is beyond time, space, duality,
judgment, because in it all things are dissolved into the changeless
whole. It has but one purpose, one nature, one reason for being, and that
is to create. And create is what it does. There is neither good nor bad
connected with its creative purpose. These are human discernments
recognized by man and obeyed by creative principle. The principle being
infinite and discernment finite on the plane of duality, it follows that man
can use creative law only in the ratio of his capacity to receive it, and no
more. One may sink as low as his faculties of invention are capable of
carrying him; one, may rise as high as his understanding and application
will reach.
The foregoing is no attempt to define love, because that cannot be done.
All definitions limit and the limitless cannot be limited, pigeon-holed, or
labeled. He who would seek to define the indefinable would only curb his
capacity for using it. Consequently, what I have said should be taken for
what I have intended it to be, a description rather than an exposition.
Also, when you read this, please understand clearly that I am not a reformed
convict, because the term reform has lost the whole of its pristine meaning. Its
purity has been defiled by many unwholesome connotations; too much
Comstockism, commercialism and hypocrisy have been attached to it in recent
years, especially, to warrant my associating myself with it in these pages. The term
has become the living symbol of suppression and all that is mean and narrow in
human conduct and behavior. Rather, I wish to be looked upon here, not as a
reformed criminal, but as a fool who has been privileged to shake of a little of his
foolishness; at least to the extent of realizing that a fool's paradise isn't all it's
cracked up to be.
In every prison they have many unjust rules, the same as every nation has many
unjust laws. One of these rules in the prison where I was last confined had to do
with what is called, for some strange reason, the right to trial.
This right was vouchsafed the prisoner charged with violating prison law in what
was known as High Court. This court was in session twice weekly. It consisted of the
deputy warden, who was its prosecutor, judge and jury. When you entered in to
answer the complaint placed against you by your warder, the deputy would read
the charge and then command you to admit your guilt to it. Why all this mockery
and waste of time that could have been better employed was, of course, a mystery.
Certainly the court was unnecessary since your accuser's word was infallible. If you
denied your guilt and thus dared to infer your innocence, your action was
equivalent to calling your warder a liar, and this implication was certain to increase
the amount of punishment meted out, unless, like Galileo, you were diplomatic
enough to change your mind and recant. The theory seemed to be that the
aspersion liar was a natural characteristic of the prisoner, but that all prison
warders were George Washington who couldn't possibly tell a lie.
Naturally, nearly every one recanted sooner or later. Some had to be persuaded by
a few weeks in the dungeon on bread and water, it is true. But so far as I know I
was the only man haled before the prison court who preferred slow death by
starvation rather than life by an admission of guilt. There was no principle involved
in my stand. None at all, other than just plain hard-headedness. I was not rebelling
against an act of injustice, because I was sufficiently honest to admit that my whole
life had been built upon injustice toward others, and that all things being equal I
had injustice coming to me. No, I was simply exercising a foolish prerogative to
remain obstinate regardless of the pain and physical consequences.
It was in the middle of an exceptionally bitter winter. The torture chamber was
damp, foul, and dark. The stone were full of frost; the concrete floors were wet and
icy. You were put into a cell with nothing but a thin, much-washed shirt and
overalls. Your shoes were taken away, but you were allowed to retain your socks. At
night the keeper of the dungeon brought you a thin and filthy cotton blanket.
Such is a brief picture of the place I entered to carry out my own self-inflicted
verdict of death. When he put me into the cell the deputy warden said: When 1 let
you out you'll crawl to me on your knees and whine and beg like a dog. And while
you're in here eating bread and water, I'll be living on ham and eggs and sleeping
in a good warm bed.
Knowing the man as I did, I had no reason on earth to believe he might suddenly
become chicken-hearted and relent. On the other hand, I told him in reply, and I
knew I meant it, that his rats would carry me out a chuck at a time before I'd ever
whine to him. Obviously, therefore, my fate was sealed as tightly as it could be
sealed by two human wills in conflict.
And yet I was finally released from the dungeon weak but alive and an infinitely
wiser person. I had done no whining or begging of any kind. In fact, from the day I
entered until the day I was released no word passed between the deputy warden
and me. He came each day and opened the solid door of my cell, stood there a
moment in silence to give me a chance to speak, then he would close the door and
pass on to his next victim.

Although I am engaged here with a few chosen events in my life, and in nowise
with an autobiography, it is necessary for me to digress at this point if the reader
would be spared the annoyance of numerous digressions later on. Certain things in
my life prior to the dungeon experience touched upon, which have a relative
importance as bearing upon that experience, must be traced out for a clearer
understanding of what might otherwise appear to border on the miraculous or the
impossible.
It is the usual thing to suppose that one's dream life is closely associated with and
to a great extent influenced by one's conscious life. And this is true to a great
extent. No doubt the dream which I shall later describe would seem too far-fetched
and contrary were it to stand alone unsupported by conditioning causes.
Since I was a person who for many years followed a criminal career, whose every
thought and action during those years had been in violent contrast to all precepts
of common decency, it is only reasonable to conclude that my dream life would
have revolved pretty much around a similar pattern. Or at least that my dream life
could hardly have been expected to revolve around holy and superior things.
But even though the years have a way of blurring the most vivid experiences of
childhood, the historic cycle has a peculiar penchant for resurrecting those
experiences, both in the conscious and subconscious realms of activity; of
duplicating events; of repeating incidents, which in their day were passed over as
having no apparent significance.
I wish to say now that as a small child my dreams were frequently woven around
the personality of Jesus, although in my home there was no particular stress laid
upon religious things, or upon the Saviour's ministry as it was recorded in the Bible.
I had no leaning toward church service, and I was not compelled to attend Sunday
school. Despite these omissions, nevertheless, my early dream life invariably had
to do with things of a holy nature.
Then at twelve years of age I began a series of minor crimes, which soon
developed into major ones. At fourteen I was a confirmed criminal with all the
bitter, negative philosophy possessed by the toughest of the men who prey. This
transition did not affect the intensity of my dream life, but it did greatly affect the
quality of my dreams.
My early dreams of Jesus had always been laid in a strange beautiful garden,
different from any garden I had ever seen, heard of, or read about. It was a shoe-
shaped valley plot surrounded by gently sloping tree and shrub-dotted hills. There
were many varieties of flowers growing wild. At one end of the garden a great white
grey rock jutted out and from behind it or through it, I could never quite tell which,
the Master would emerge and walk toward me, carefully avoiding the flowers as He
moved slowly along.
The pattern of these dreams changed promptly with the pattern of my life. The
peaceful garden through which the Master strolled under Judean stars and dew-
freshened dawns, became a merciless jungle filled with gun-toting enemies,
emissaries of the law, all bent upon my capture.
In rapid succession of events, I would envision myself under arrest, of being tried in
court and convicted. I would hear the grim verdict read and listen to the terrifying
pronouncement of sentence. I could experience all the agony of suspense that
stretched between the day of sentence pronouncement and the day of its
execution. Sometimes 1 would see myself being escorted to the scaffold or the
electric chair behind a dour-faced individual mumbling gloomy prayers for the safe
journey of my sin-tainted soul. Very often I would reach the lethal monster and feel
the black cap being drawn over my face, like a fiendish bandage, or the straps
being adjusted to my legs. But invariably I would wake in the nick of time,
trembling, sweating, exhausted.
I've passed through the hot pits of many tortures, but none to compare to these
subconscious hours where deferred judgment assumed all the hideous aspects of
actuality.
That they were prophetic dreams I have no doubt. Criminal activities always lead
toward the commission of murder and murder toward the executioner. And yet the
fear of these sinister prospects was not sufficient to alter the course of my criminal
tendencies. In fact, neither fear of punishment nor persuasion, kind treatment or
brutal, had any effect on the type of life I preferred to live.
During my many years in prison I was the object of a great deal of well-intentioned
kindness, as well as harshness. Different social workers tried to influence my
attitude. These good people were called sobsters in the prison vernacular. We used
to vie with each other for their gifts and favors, and whatever influence, political,
they might bring to bear upon parole-boards in our behalf. But always their advice
was an extremely obnoxious service which we assumed to relish, lest we forfeit the
opportunity of using our advisers toward other ends.
Sometimes they would come to the prison chapel and make sentimental speeches,
exhorting us to put on the raiment of reformation. And we would appear to be
moved by their soul-stirring appeals, even to the shedding of realistic tears. Then
when the ringing call would come for us to resolve to lead new lives, our hands
would go up in eager unison, a gesture that was supposed to pledge our souls and
minds to the straight and narrow path ever after.
They would leave the prison burning with the enthusiasm mighty things
accomplished for the Cause. But if the could have heard our remarks following their
departure I'm afraid they never again would have had the courage to face a prison
audience.
These good but misinformed souls would spend much time and money in the prison
crusades, and I suppose the still do so, but so far as my own experience can reach,
I've never known a man who was reformed because of their well-intentioned
efforts. Personally I am convinced that a man changes his life pattern only
when he himself is definitely ready for such a change. And that until he is
ready, no pressure, reason or persuasion on earth can influence him one
iota. I am convinced, also, that reform is wholly a matter of transcending
old desires and habits of life, and not the suppression of them through
fears and other forces of the will. No man can claim to be reformed who is
still in conflict with the old habits of his life. So long as such habits are
not risen above a relapse into them is constantly an imminent possibility.
But in spite of what I've found to be true in my own experience, I would not
presume to set my findings up as a criterion. I have no desire to discredit or
discourage the activities of prison social workers. Nor would I wish to discredit or
discourage those engaged in the field of juvenile delinquency because of what I
have experienced as a juvenile delinquent myself. It is important nevertheless, that
I be honest in presenting my early attitude and conclusions as a youthful outlaw.
Naturally I came in contact with all the reform movements that were active at that
time. If they taught me anything it was sharpness of wit. I soon learned that
through these movements I could escape the consequences of much of my
wrongdoing. I became an artful maker of promises and a skillful creator of lies.
These I would trade for immunity whenever it could be done.
Quite often I was made the object for scientific study and treatment. These
laboratory adventures, instead of helping me, served only to furnish another
excuse for carrying on against whatever restrictive conscience I had left. They
made me conscious of my difference from other kids. I was what I was because it
had to be that way. I was born with a quirk in my brain. I wasn't my fault at all.
Crime was just something that belonged to me; and any act I performed no matter
how vicious was merely an expression of my natural self.
And later when the power of reason began to assert itself, I developed a cynical
attitude toward all reform movements, I became skeptical of their motives, and
even while I took every advantage of their influence, I resented their patronizing
sentimentalism; their self righteousness; and particularly was I embittered by all
psychiatrical attempts to dissect, analyze and label me in the manner of some
queer zoological specimen.
Out of this resentment and bitterness grew the most deadly philosophy in
the world. I call it convict philosophy. It contains the whitest logic ever
conceived in the brains of men. It batters down every sham behind which
people hide their weaknesses. It tears at all personal inconsistencies with
tiger-like fangs. It makes all men, women and children criminals at heart;
gives every one the impulse to kill, steal and ravage. To the criminal in
prison it distinguishes but one difference between him and the person
outside of prison, and that difference is enunciated with a sardonic sneer.
The one is in, the other is out. That is all. A stone wall makes the only
difference.
The danger of this philosophy lies in its very truth, for potentially and
actually all men and women have come short of the law.
The philosophy, also, has it self-condemnatory side. The criminal on the
inside arraigns himself brutally for being fool enough to get caught in a
trap others skillfully evade. After he is in for awhile he begins to see a
hundred ways by which he might have escaped punishment. And he
resolves thereupon never to make the same mistake again. And in this
respect, at least, he leaves prison with good intentions, according to his
own code.
All in all, the only positive thing that can be said about convict philosophy is that it
is positively deadly to the man who entertains it. One who is inoculated with it is
dogmatic to the point of fanaticism. He cannot be reached by either reason,
punishment or persuasion, because his mind is set as hard as concrete against
every attempt made to change him by those whose motives he questions. A prison
sentence only adds fuel to the fires of his world-girdling disillusionment. He is a
confirmed fault-finder, an absolute destructionist, and he seldom wakes up before it
is too late to prevent his own physical, mental and moral decay.

During the time I was engaged in the following experiences-- a period of three
years, perhaps, in all-- I made and preserved certain notes, a few of which I later
published in a short series of brief articles. These together with the remainder lay
fallow in my trunk for many months. Then they were shown to a friend, a man who
had done something along the same line himself with, as he said, more or less
nebulous results. He became quite interested and urged me to work my notes up in
a book form. At the time I was unable to respond to his suggestions.
He thought that I was obligated to such a task; that I had no personal right to hide
experiences of the kind. I, of course, was interested in his reason.
Why haven't I a right to keep them? I prompted him.
He thought such a book might be helpful to others. Frankly my conceit was neither
large enough nor my knowledge broad enough to include this reason. The
knowledge I had gained, extremely meager though it was when compared to what I
had failed to gain, had been sufficient to convince me that one man's experiences
could do little more than stimulate interest in another; that they could not convince
another of the efficacy in applying abstract principle to practical problems by
merely reading about such experiences.
That is a great service in itself, he said, to stimulate, to encourage others to think
for themselves and then apply their thinking to their own problems.
In his inimitably enthusiastic manner, he referred to me as one who had conquered
an inferno. He said my methods had been practical and my accomplishments so
obvious that merely to read of them would prove an inspiration to many with
similarly difficult problems.
In other words, I smiled at his fervour, the world is in need of a brand new Messiah
and you've picked on me for the job.
To my surprise and amazement he nodded his head. My smile became a hearty
laugh. I the new Messiah! I whose numerous names adorned every police blotter in
the country ! I whose picture could be found in all the rogues' galleries, and whose
measurements were tucked away in every bureau of criminal identification! I who
had just recently emerged from a prison cell to point the way for honest folks to
follow! I a burned-out burglar taking up the exemplary task of teaching ethics!
It isn't so absurd, he said dryly. There's been some pretty good men in prison cells,
and there's been some pretty good things come out of prison. As I see it, it isn't
that you were in prison that counts at all: it's what you did there that might be of
help to some one else that really matters.
The upshot of it was that this friend convinced me finally that such a book might
truly have some value as a contribution to human encouragement, if nothing else.
Certainly I approach the task humbly. My hope is that some of those in whose
hands the book might fall will be moved to try the simple principles in their
problems as I have been privileged to try them with highly beneficial results.
Throughout these pages I offer no false claims. There isn't a thing new or original
between these book ends. In presenting what is as old as the universe itself, I
haven't even the claim of an original literary style, whatever such a thing might be.
I deal wholly in the obvious; but it is an obvious that for many years I refused to
see, even to deny, and to continue to deny its presence until the scorching fires of
prison hell had welded it into my soul.
I am not an author by any means. I am not even a very well educated person,
having had practically no formal schooling. I am just a common ordinary human
being who had to be taught horse-sense the hard way: by strong-arm methods.
The simple methods I have used were here with Adam. Many have used them
before me. Many will use them after I've shuffled through the last dark door. All
knowledge is a common property that may be appropriated, thank God, by those
who need it and wish it. Knowledge is the one thing in existence selfish greed has
failed to put a fence around and post with No Trespassing signs. Too, any intelligent
person can do far more with a little knowledge than I have been able to do, for I am
neither intelligent nor keenly receptive to the finer shades of wisdom and
understanding.
As a plain matter of fact, I am handicapped with an overabundance of that sort of
peace and contentment not attracted toward the ends of vigorous ambition. I am
what some call a confirmed homebody. I'm satisfied with simple things: my books,
my meditations, my thoroughly harmonious home, my club, my friends. I've
entered the calm after the storm and I find it pleasant.
So far I've tried to use the creative principle with great determination only in the
hard pinches; and if by recounting a few of these some of you are enabled to take
another reef in your own flagging determinations, I'll consider my feeble effort
repaid with multiple compound interest.

For about twenty years I used to engage in a most idiotic pastime. Like most
criminals I had not yet discovered humour, so I took this pastime very seriously. I
claimed as my pet aversion ignorance in everybody else, except of course, in
myself. And since I had not discovered humour, my voice was raised in bellowing
proportion against one particular form of ignorance. It goes without saying, I made
a fool and a nuisance of myself. One of my most imposing defiance against this
particular shade of ignorance, was a declaration of denial.
If there's a God, I would roar heroically in the presence of some one whom I knew
to entertain religious beliefs, then let Him prove Himself by striking me dead.
Once I made the silly remark in the company of a sardonic: old safe-blower, who
replied laconically: God don't strike fools dead. He throws 'em a rope.
The droll remark came back to me when I had just about let out enough rope with
which to hang myself.
I started out by hating God and wound up by hating everything, including
my own infallible wisdom. I was a little too wise in those days to know anything
about the psychology of hate and all other forms of negation. For example, I didn't
know that hate could disturb the digestive and assimilative system to the extent of
bringing on attacks of indigestion and constipation, sluggish blood circulation, and
many other conditioning reflexes of the mind and body. I went right on suffering
them all and hating. Besides it was popular in the circle in which I moved to evince
the rebel spirit by hating all things sacred and decent.
I took great pride criticizing everything that did not conform to an attitude of
destruction. As for human life, I held it in contempt. Nothing was cheaper, and
nothing was so worthy to be preyed upon.
Consequently, being a criminal, and being so poor a criminal as to carry around
with me a whole pack of defeatist's philosophy, I spent the greater portion of my
time behind iron bars.
Now short terms in prison are not such terrifying experiences as most people
imagine them to be. They terrify the beginner for awhile, but he soon becomes
adjusted and settles down to make the best of things. It is the long prison terms
that make of prisons a living death-house. When it's all said and done, there is just
one punishment inflicted by prison incarceration, and that falls upon the long-
termers. But this one punishment is sufficient to defeat any purpose the prison
system might hold in the way of correcting criminal tendencies or eradicating a
criminal causes.
There is no normal outlet, physically, for the most purely animal dynamic force in
existence; no normal way to gratify re most maddening hunger that ever gripped
the human side of man ; no way to turn the procreative impulse into normal human
channels of expression. No way, that is, that prisoners have discovered, save a
remarkably few. Only a very few have been able to sublimate this energy and turn
it into useful purposes.
The usual attempted way, the vicarious way, and it represents all the ways possible
to imagine, instead of gratifying the hunger only adds to it. Men and women in
prison sacrifice themselves mentally, morally and physically to this relentless
appetite without avail. Their sacrifices lead only to disgust with themselves; and
occasionally it carries them on to a padded cell.
Otherwise, they are eventually released with the hope they are now purged of their
pernicious tendencies. Such a hope is tragic in its pathetic disappointment.
Wardens know it. All prison officials know it. But society doesn't know, because
society would rather pay the bill, perhaps, than take an interest in such sordid
facts. Such conditions do not and cannot prove beneficial to the social system. At
any rate, such is my opinion. I'm willing to leave the matter in the hands of
sociological students. So I'll go no farther into it here. I may even be wrong. It may
be that these poor demoralized objects of an experimental penal age, are an asset
to society. I prefer to think otherwise.
As I said before, the deputy warden came every morning to the door of my
dungeon cell, tempting me to confess and go free. I held out doggedly for weeks.
Emaciated and filthy, I was many times tempted to crawl to the door and accede to
his wishes, but I always managed to steel my will against the course. As time went
on the torture of starvation became less noticeable and less painful. Too, I felt
myself gradually becoming inured to the cold. It seemed that my life was running
out into a sort of dull, insensate chaos. Mine was a case of stubborn will versus the
law of self preservation, with the former showing every indication of complete
victory.
Why such a thought flashed across my mind I don't know-- it had been years since
I'd had a constructive thought-- but there came to my soggy brain about this time a
thought of wonderment. I wondered where such determination of will would end if it
was directed differently, if it was turned toward a purpose of intelligent self
interest.
There followed a period of mild, dreamy delirium in which I seemed to exist half
awake and half asleep. For awhile the content of these dreams was like a confused
and pointless riddle. They had no beginning and no end; but drifted and drifted and
drifted through my head without continuity or consistency. As I grew weaker,
however, they appeared to take on more definite outlines, to become more
rational, more vivid and meaningful.
And then one day there occurred in my dream the man whom I'd been
trying to hate for years, Jesus the Christ.
He appeared in a garden in every way similar to the one I had seen Him in
as a child. His physical appearance was also similar. The whole picture
had that quiet clarity about it that draws out thematic details of
expression, of feeling, of thought, of purpose. He came towards me, His
lips moving as though in prayer. He stopped near me eventually and stood
looking down. I had never seen such love in human eye; I had never felt
so utterly enveloped in love. I seemed to know consciously that I had
seen and felt something that would influence my life throughout all
eternity.
Presently, He began slowly to fade in the manner of some casual process
of dematerialization. Out of what had been a vision of Him there emerged
a vision of the word Love in large gossamer irregular letters, which
remained a moment, and then as He had done, slowly vanished.
Following this particular dream I lay for a long time enveloped in a keen
sense of awareness. Even though the visual aspects of the dream had
disappeared, its quality lingered. It seemed to have become a part of me.
Where I had been the recipient of the Master's love, I now felt myself
exuding love. It seemed to pour from me in the form of some mighty
sense of blissful gratitude, not for any one thing or things, but for all
things, for life. I had no discernment or consciousness apart from this
enchantment of universal love. I seemed to have escaped from all the
personal bodily and environmental limitations that had hitherto tortured
me. I was not aware of dungeon walls, but my thoughts seemed to roam
afar both in space and time. (In fact, neither time nor space appeared to
have definition or the modification of boundary lines).
And later I became aware of still another sense of freedom. What I had
always thought to be imagination, occurred to me as reality. While I visited
places undoubtedly historical but ancient, I experienced no difficulty in adjusting
myself to the modes and customs of these places. I seemed to possess infinite
versatility, readily speaking the language or dialect of the various peoples of these
places, and to be perfectly familiar with their laws, their religious beliefs, their
government policies, their art and literature. In the reading of the latter, I seemed
to possess an amazing proficiency. I read manuscripts and books by pages at a
glance with an accuracy that was unerring.
By and by I became aware of my actual whereabouts, but not in the same sense I
had been aware of it before. There was no sensibility of discomfort attached to the
dungeon now, no feeling of bitterness or stubbornness. The place seemed to
radiate with a wholly congenial and alluring atmosphere. My imagination appeared
to function in an acute and consistently pleasurable manner.
I would experiment with the barren cell, reappointing it to fit the convenience of
special guests, which I would later invite. Always these were men of wisdom, and
always the dominating subjects discussed by them were subjects of life, and truth.
It was at these imaginary symposiums that I first heard of the creative principle, of
the media of love, discussed in an analytical manner, which later, applied, not only
opened my dungeon door without an overture on my part, but opened In trying to
describe this state of temporary being, I'm not I desirous of being drawn into
controversy about its causes or its scientific qualities or its lack of them. I am
merely describing what occurred, its effect upon my future conduct and behavior,
and what I was enabled to do with the knowledge I had gained in this manner. Nor
do I wish to leave any egotistical impressions on the minds of my readers. I was
lifted into this state through no conscious efforts of my own. It came to me
unbidden, unsought. It was a gift to a man who, from the human standpoint, had
rendered himself unworthy of human consideration. That it was an act of
Providence I've never doubted. Why or for what purpose, I've been able only to
guess. Left to my own devices my body soon would have been destroyed. I was
doing all in my power to bring about that finale, and certainly the time for it was
dangerously close at hand.
From the moment I was drawn into the state, unusual things began to
happen. The prison doctor stopped at my door for the first time to inquire after my
health, and to linger at my door and talk. He came three times in that one day,
eager to do something for me in his professional capacity. Courteous and kind, he
pressed me again and again for a different answer in regard to my health, and
seemed bewildered when I re-affirmed the fact that I had never felt better than I
did at the moment.
The keeper of the dungeon, a man who had taken a violent dislike for me from the
start, came to my door with gracious words on his lips. I had hated him and now I
loved him. He offered to disobey the rules and smuggle in a sandwich from the
officers' dining-room if I'd only say the word. I thanked him, but explained that I
was not in the least hungry. He went away shaking his head.
But during this period the deputy warden, who had been making regular daily visits
to my door, suddenly stopped coming. Often I thought of him with an all-consuming
compassion. I believe it was on the third day that he opened my door and said,
Well, buddy, I think you've had enough. You can go over to the hospital and clean
up and rest for awhile.
A few days later I received a complete new outfit of clothing and was assigned a
new and easier job in the prison shirt shop.

LOVE VERSUS PRISON DOOR OF SELF

CHAPTER III

Brave conquerors! For so you are


Who war against your own affections
And the huge army of the world's desires,
-Shakespeare.

We of today recognize the great English playwright's genius, but what was taken for
wisdom in his day we've found to be false in ours.
We know now that war in any form has never solved a human problem. We know
that to declare a state of war between us and our desires does not eradicate those
desires, but rather intensifies them in proportion as our war-like wills appear
victorious and strong.
When I came out of the dungeon and had again resumed my routine duties, I was
in possession of an idea that had worked a seeming miracle in my behalf. But while
I had a recognition of this idea, I did not have the sense of illumination, the feeling
of ecstasy that had been born to me as a result of it there. Too, although I realized
the idea to be a medium through which I could contact creative power, I didn't
know how to go about applying the medium to my problems now.
These problems were many and life-long duration. They began immediately to
present themselves to me for consideration the same day I had my release from
punishment; for that day there was established in me an intense desire for a new
deal of livingness.
Therefore, I sat down one evening to list my mental, moral and physical assets and
liabilities. I discovered that I had shelter, food and clothing, such as they were. I
was able to read, write and cipher a little. Against these things the list of my
liabilities ran into interminable lengths.
The problem appeared simple under such circumstances. I would simply start from
scratch, and declare war on my physical ill health, replace my negative attitude
with a positive attitude, substitute optimism for pessimism, and presto, all would be
hunky-dory.
The thoughtful reader, however, will see that I had set a mighty big order for
myself. In fact, what I desired to accomplish meant a complete right-about-face
from all the destructive habits I had acquired and nurtured through the years. My
intention was to go to war against them and slay them in one fell blow with the
rapier of my will. My intentions were excellent; however, I hadn't reckoned on the
strength of the enemy. My effort, though heroic, was short-lived and ended in
dismal and mind-tormenting failure.
The more I tried to war against my habits, the more persistently they pressed their
claims upon me. I grew melancholy under the strain. A sense of weakness and
hopelessness took hold of me, which defied constructive thinking, which defied
thinking of any kind, except thoughts of impotence and misery.
The desire for the things I had lived became more and more intense, until reason
warned me that a compromise would have to be made, and compromise was the
first step to failure. From it the plunge back down would be swift and certain.
But the worst of all, my health instead of improving under the ordeal, took an
opposite turn. I soon learned that willpower was one thing, and that to use it
constructively against life-long habits was another.
It seemed that all the legions of hell had turned out to concentrate their fire upon
me alone. If I decided to miss a meal out of regard for my health, that particular
meal would be certain to contain seldom-served items that I especially liked. Every
time I picked up a magazine or newspaper, I would be sure to find some brilliant,
logical attack up on the virtues I had set before me. Things occurred that I had
never known to occur before to test my resolve. For instance, I had been an
inveterate user of profanity. And being profane, I had not noticed it being used by
others so much. But no sooner had I resolved to stop its use, I began to notice that
every one seemed to use it. Books that contained it were thrust in my way. An
essay by a popular author on the use of profanity was given to me. The author
argued that those who did not curse had no strength of character. Men who
couldn't say damn once in a while had lost all claim to masculinity. They were
unpardonable sissies; and he clinched his argument with a long list of leaders in
American history, including the father of his country, who had cursed their way to
fame and victory over insurmountable odds. Profanity was a vigorous mode of
expression that fitted perfectly into all occasions requiring force and vigor.
I had a habit of chewing tobacco, which, for me in prison, had been an expensive
one to gratify. To obtain chewing tobacco had been a constant struggle. But now
that I had resolved to give the habit up, the weed was forced upon me from all
manner of sources without one single effort on my part to acquire it.
My strongest mental habit had been intolerance of other persons' opinions, which
had, all my life, kept me in hot water, fights and squabbles. Of course, this habit
headed my list. I determined I would look at the other fellow's viewpoint and
respect it even if I couldn't agree with it. I would refuse to argue with anyone,
taking the stand that fools argued and wise men discussed. But again this good
intention was easier resolved than carried out. It seemed that those with whom I
came in contact would be pacified with nothing short of hot words. And the more I
tried to force my resolution by sheer will-power the more easily irritated I seemed
to become.
I had always thought I possessed courage. I had no fear of physical pain. I had been
clubbed by policemen into states of insensibility. I had faced death many times
while pulling off burglaries; I would fight any man at the drop of a hat. Then one
day, after I had made my resolution to be broad and tolerant, a fellow told me I was
yellow; that I didn't know what courage was. I was on my feet in an instant. But I
steeled myself, gulped down the old impulse to do battle, and listened while he
brutally continued his accusation.
I'll tell you what courage is, he said. You've never known what the word meant.
Everybody in this joint knows you've always been hard-boiled. You've preached
tooth and fang sermons around here for years. Now you've decided you were all
wet and wrong. You've gone wishy-washy. All right, if you've got courage you'll go
up on the chapel platform the next day we have open forum and tell all your old
friends all about it. Preach us a sermon about your grand and glorious reformation.
That'll take the kind of courage you ain't got.
Strangely enough I hadn't thought of that particular kind of courage before. But
now I realized that bullets and blackjacks were easier to face than the ridicule of
one's cynical fellows en masse. As I pondered on such a predicament, I could
visualize an audience of sneering faces; I could hear their cat-calls and boos ; their
hisses, and their innuendoes of turn-tail, yaller-cur, long-tailed rat, and a hundred
other savage aspersions.
I didn't have the courage to face a thing of this kind, but I forced my will to accept
the challenge. I made a prepared talk and committed it to memory. Then I sent my
name and desire to the open forum director. I lived a million years of emotional
agony between that day and the day I was billed to speak. When the day finally
came I was almost a complete invalid. As I sat on the platform trying to pretend
poise as the lines filed into the auditorium, the pit of my stomach was churning like
a ball of red-hot vacuum without a mooring. As I was being introduced, a wave of
nausea swept over me and I began to tremble from head to feet. As I rose, I was
met with a roar of ridicule; tide after tide of it broke over me as I stood there
waiting for it to subside. I felt as though I was losing consciousness. Then came a
dead hush, in which I imagined one might hear a feather fall above the mad
pumping of my heart. I started out to speak; my lips quivered open, but not a
syllable issued forth. If ever self styled hero made an inglorious retreat that hero
was me. I slunk from the auditorium amid the wildest surge of abuse I've ever
heard before or since. Right there and then I decided to scuttle all my fine
resolutions. But Providence once more came to my rescue, this time in a wholly
different manner.
I was to occupy that same platform many times after this frightful fizzle. I was to
debate my newfound philosophy of behavior with some of the most
brilliant forum minds. I was to hear cheers and applause, where I had
once heard only sneers and guffaws. But I didn't achieve these things by
the war process against my habits and weaknesses. I achieved then not
by trying new habits that transcended the old. To war against a thing is to
hate that thing. To sublimate a condition is to employ the medium of love.
The one compresses the condition into a more intensified circumference,
the other expands it until it has no circumference left.
It so happened, and how fortunate it was for me, that just after I reached this crisis,
I was transferred to a different cell! The man with whom I was to share this latter
cell was a life-termer well along in years.
His name was Dad Trueblood, but he was often referred to as The Old Stir Bug.
Ordinarily this name was applied in an uncharitable sense to those prisoners who
had attracted it through odd or queer quirks in their mental characters. But in the
case of Dad Trueblood it was untouched by the critical or opprobrious. For this old
fellow was the most beloved man who had ever done time in this particular prison.
He was loved by both prisoners and officials alike, a combination rarely found
behind stone walls.
Dad was one of those exceptional persons the most chary could trust; one of those
singular individuals who, without uttering a word, broke down the strongest
restraint in others and set them to blabbing their troubles in his ear as naively as a
child goes running with its troubles to its mother. He was one of those occasional
men who could win another's confidence without effort, and with just as little effort
keep that confidence strictly inviolable.
Had Dad wished to turn informer, he could have sent scores of his confidants to
longer prison terms, and many to the electric chair. But Dad was not an informer,
and although this prison, like all other prisons, was managed after the stool-pigeon
system, no official ever thought of offending Dad's sensibilities by offering him
special privileges in return for tainted favors.
The odd twist that gave Dad the name Stir Bug occurred because he had refused a
pardon after having served twenty-seven years. His reason for such an unheard-of
act was strange and yet wholly consistent with his character. When the warden
asked him why he preferred to remain voluntarily in prison, he said that he was
getting old; that he no longer had any friends or relatives on the outside; and that
he thought he could be of more service in prison than out.
But don't you want your freedom? the warden had asked incredulously.
I'm always free,'' the old lifer had replied. It doesn't make any difference
where you are on the face of the earth, warden. If your thoughts are free
you're free. And there's no one can imprison your thoughts but yourself.
And so Dad Trueblood had been permitted the privilege of remaining a number
instead of going out and once more becoming a name.
When I moved my belongings into his cell he was lying on his bunk. He welcomed
me casually in a friendly manner. He knew, of course, of my reputation as a bad
actor. There were few words passed between us until we had been locked in for the
evening. Then I asked him if he dad seen my fade-away in the chapel. Yes, he had
been there that day. He thought most any one else would hade done likewise under
similar circumstances. But he asked no curious questions about it.
Finally, I related my experience in the dungeon; and of my desires after coming out;
of terrific willpower battle to overcome my old habits; of my pitiful failure to do
anything in that direction. But after that chapel deal, I finished, I got wise to myself
in a jiffy.
How do you mean? he asked in an off-hand way.
I mean this virtue stuff is all the bunk, I said.
Then what does that make the other stuff? The stuff you've been living before ?
There are some pretty wise men who have taken the gold out of the Golden Rule,
and have made that rule look pretty small, at least on paper, I replied evasively.
That doesn't seem important, son, in your case, Dad said. You've been following
another rule. The important thing is, what has it got you? Critics and logicians deal
with the trees in a forest, without ever seeing the forest itself. That's what you
should be looking at now -- not the too logical details, not what the other fellow has
done with your old philosophy, but what you have done with it. If you're satisfied
with the results, then your rule has worked out, if not, then the sensible thing to do
is to stick to your guns and try another way.
But I've tried that and failed, I said hopelessly.
No, you haven't, he said, you've just gone at it wrong. For instance, if you wanted
to become a cannibal right quick, where before you'd only been a moderate eater
of meat, why just force yourself to break off with meat by using your will and
nothing else. No, son, the easiest and safest way to rid yourself of many
bad habits is to recondition yourself to one good habit. Once you have it
established, the others will have disappeared without much strain.
What he did was to show me how to apply the idea I had discovered in solitary
confinement, or rather the idea that had been discovered for me, and turned to my
account in spite of me.
First I was to forget all about my notion of going to war with my habits. I
was just to assume that nothing had happened to me; that my attitude
was the same as it had always been; that I was not to make any attempt
to force a change in my custom of living; but that whenever and wherever
I could do it without strain or pressure, to do something constructively
creative; a quiet thought, an encouraging word to some one at the right
time, a stimulating hint to another, a constructive action, either selfish or
unselfish.
I was to read, as I had always read, books that appealed to the negative side of my
life. But as I read I was to try to build in something positive between the lines,
whenever I could appear to do it without too much labor.
Make it a game, son, he said, and not a task. Let it be a challenge but not
a command.
Guided safely by the unerring knowledge Dad had of sublimation, I entered into the
spirit of the game and found it not only profitable but pleasurable. It was accepted
as a novelty, a plaything, something, with which to while away the time; and the
joy of which depended upon the game itself, and not upon the results to be
accomplished.
During the day at my machine I made a game of sewing garments. Each one I
finished had in it an effort to make it better than its predecessor. This part of the
game alone relieved me entirely of the burden my labor had always had for me
before. As a I continued to play it, I soon found it becoming a fascinating habit.
Time that had always dragged heavily with each begrudging stitch, now flew by on
wings of tirelessness. I won privileges on my workmanship, and many compliments
from the superintendent of the shop. But the surprising thing about it all was that I
not only made better garments, but I was able to complete my task in much less
time than when I had been fighting the sewing machine every minute and turning
out slipshod material; where I had been constantly jerking at my cloth and breaking
my thread, thus wasting time rethreading my needle, I now worked more
smoothly and consequently with little lost motion. One of my best games
was to see how many completed garments I could make without an accidental
breaking of my thread. On several occasions I finished the whole task, twelve
garments, without a mishap.
This game was taken up by those around me, and eventually spread over the entire
shop. The superintendent was amazed at the results. He made it a competitive
game and offered prizes for the winners. Not only were the garments made better;
but there was a great saving accomplished by eliminating wastage, garments too
hastily thrown together that later had to be discarded and new ones made to
replace them.
And all the while I would be working away at my task, I also played a game with my
thoughts. I would analyze them as they drifted through my mind. I would label each
as it came along. If it was destructive, I would counter with a constructive one
deliberately created for the purpose, and vice versa. As I continued to play, I soon
became conscious of a subtle, but definite drawing away of the destructive
thoughts. The constructive ones came more and more unbidden, until finally I was
aware that whole sequences of them would pass through my mind without being
broken by one negation. Too, I found it becoming increasingly repugnant to
deliberately create a destructive thought to carry out my game of counter-action.
Then when my task had been completed, I hatched up another game. I called it the
game of constructive deeds. Each day I tried to increase the number of little
unobtrusive things I could do for my fellows. I would hold loving thoughts
toward men who had always been my avowed enemies. Many of them I
had bloody encounters with and hadn't spoken to since. Without fitting
any other action to these thoughts, I watched and waited, and in every
case was rewarded by seeing the iceberg melt that had stood between us,
and it wasn't long until I had no enemies left.
This game by itself did something psychic to me. I didn't know what it was at the
time. But it was an expanding something that drew men closer to me, even while I
drew farther away from the life or the type of livingness they stood for. I didn't
know why men distrusted the pious and self righteous sort of comradeship and
fellowship; nor exactly what the difference was between that sort and the sort that
I was expressing; but I knew there was a difference because the results were
different. What that difference was didn't seem to matter. I was becoming more
and more result-conscious, and this in itself was an excellent sign.
And then at night in my cell I would take up a book that I had always looked upon
as my Bible. It was Schopenhauer's Studies in Pessimism. With this book I now
made another fascinating game. I went through it thought for thought, translating
it in long-hand on pieces of wrapping paper. My translation of the title was Studies
In Positiveness. For each negative thought given by the author, I wrote down its
best positive opposite.
Nor did one of the author's negations defy translation, indeed I invariably found
many positive thoughts in one of his negative ones, from which I would choose the
strongest. Sometimes it took me an entire evening to get over one page; other
times I would do as many as five pages. Only once did I ask Dad to help me, and
then he shook his wise old head.
Solitaire is a one man game, he said, and you're doing fine. Keep right after it until
you win on your own efforts.
That enormous bundle of manuscript was destroyed. I've often wished I had
preserved it. There was a certain sentiment attached to it, I suppose. It was
something tangible that stood for something much greater, though intangible, the
beginning of a slow but steady bulge upward. But after all, though the manuscript
was destroyed, its effect on me is still alive and will remain so until the end of my
days. The effects of constructive building are eternal: destructive building
leads to limitation and death. But of all my early games with the
implements of life, I believe this one, in its cumulative results, had the
greatest influence for good.

The translating of this book gave me an intense interest m the positive side of life.
It led me smoothly into an examination of the Old and New Scriptures, and of other
literature that stressed the positive along with the negative in human behavior.
However, in this prison at that time, true positive literature was a scarce article.
One day I picked up a magazine of the kind that had been nearly worn out from
much reading and had been discarded by its last reader. With great enthusiasm, I
went through it from cover to cover. When I had finished I decided I would have a
friend subscribe for it in my name and number.
The subscription was entered and I waited eagerly for my first copy. I waited
several weeks. Then I had my friend write the publisher to find out about the delay.
A reply informed me that the magazine, along with other printed matter from the
same publisher, had been coming to me regularly. A little private investigation
turned up the information that our chaplain, who was also our literary censor, had
disapproved of the reading material presented through this publishing house.
My first impulse was to fly into a good old-fashioned fit of rebellion and write the
chaplain a vituperative note of denunciation. In fact I did talk to Dad in no uncertain
terms as to what I thought of a chaplain who would permit every deadening and
salacious book and magazine printed to come in to us, and then set his objection
on a magazine that didn't carry a single article or item not calculated to lift the
consciousness of its readers.
The old man listened patiently until I had spent myself. Then he said: All
true, and heroically put, son. It's pleasing to unburden ourselves
sometimes of what has all the earmarks of justifiable indignation. But the
trouble with it in this case is that it only makes bad matters worse.
Remember the little game you're playing ? Well, it's a broad game. Any
situation can be fitted into it. But not with hate and criticism; that is, if
you expect to win.
But how in this case? I asked him.
How did you break down enmity over in the shop? He said no more. But his
suggestion was enough.
I set about to formulate a new game around the chaplain. First I studied him and
got to the bottom of his reasons for withholding my literature. I couldn't agree with
those reasons. They seemed narrow and unreasonable to me. But I did grant him
the right to entertain them, even though they had appearance of injury to me. I
told myself that since the material printed in this magazine was in conflict with the
religious creed held by the chaplain he was actuated by that consideration alone,
and that he was honestly sincere in his belief that such reading matter would do
harm to those who read it.
As I reasoned thus, I could not help but feel sorry for a man laboring
under such rigid limitations. And this emotion, although it is not true
love, is mighty close to compassion. At any rate, I soon found myself
creating genuinely loving thoughts toward my censor. I began visualizing
him as I thought the Master might visualize him. And the more I played at
the game the more I thought of him as an EXPRESSION OF GOD and the
less I thought of him as an expression of limitation.
Besides, I found a way of doing a few little services for him without his finding out
who did them. For instance, I pointed out to my warder that three sun-shades
would greatly improve the looks of the administration building. The warder agreed
with me and said he would point the same thing out to the warden. As a result I
was permitted to make the shades as well as the pattern. I made them as attractive
as I possibly could; and they did improve the looks of that part of the building. But
the one most pleased with the innovation was the chaplin, because it was the
windows to his study they shaded against the afternoon sun.
On another occasion I was able to acquire a red-lettered student's Bible, a beautiful
book, and have it placed on the chaplin's desk in his absence. On the first flyleaf I
had written, With the compliments of a friend.
In the meantime I spoke no word to him. I attended his services and found him
saying things that were illuminating and admirable -- thing that I had formerly
closed my mind against with a door of indifference and prejudice. With this door
now opened the effect was exhilarating. I seemed to lose all interest in his human
faults and shortcoming, particularly as they affected me. I began to think of him in
terms of brotherly love and to feel what I thought intensely.
Then one noon day he came down the gallery and stopped in front of our cell. He
carried under his arm several magazines and pamphlets that had been sent to me.
He told me that he had seen fit to censor them because they dealt with pantheism;
[the doctrine identifying God with the various forces and workings of nature] a
dangerous doctrine. Recently, however, he had changed his mind and decided to
allow me to have books, providing I would promise not to pass them on to others. I
made no such promise; nor did he seem insistent on that point. I thanked him, and
we talked for quite some time in a real get-acquainted fashion, and a friendship
was there established between us that was active until the day I bade him
goodbye.
This demonstration, and it was a demonstration, of the power of love to
use creative principle effectively against adverse conditions, not only
helped me in this particular, but it helped scores of my fellows, because
shortly after it the chaplain lifted his ban on the literature of this
publishing house and this prison became one among many into which this
house sent free reading matter to the inmates.
Obviously, love can open prison doors-all manner of prison doors. But of
all the doors most important to open, none is more important than the
door of self. Self conquest through sublimation is the key to the fullest
realm of livingness.
I do not presume to say that I had conquered myself. But I have traveled a piece of
the way, and I am moving in the right direction. Looking down the list on the
liability side of my ledger, I can see many items that have undergone a process of
transformation and now adorn the side on which I've written down my assets. This
side of my list is longer than the liability side, much longer. Many little victories
have made it so, and each one of those small victories carried with it its own
particular thrill. The game has been pleasurable and there is still much room for
play. My asset list is only partially complete. I shall probably never complete it in
my remaining lifetime, but I'll have a lot of fun playing the game to that end.
It will be recalled that at the time my list was made I suffered from many
physical ills. These have all vanished without my being aware of the
reconditioning process. Wholesome, constructive thinking did the trick,
reflecting in my physical organism that which I held in my mind.
Since that time, and it has been several years, I've suffered very few physical
indispositions. My body converts food into energy almost instantly now. I follow
sane health rules, of course, for they are constructive and it pays to follow them.
With excellent elimination and excellent assimilation, I am no longer a sufferer of
that powerful physical enemy of man, inertia. [resistance to change]. I can work
long hours without feeling fatigue. I can induce sleep within a moment and rest,
perfectly relaxed for six hours, undisturbed by dreams or noise. All of which is
something. Or at least to me it has been worth gaining, especially since the method
used to gain it was a joy in itself. Cheerfulness to me now is a habit I seldom feel
moved to break. Those long periods of hopelessness, indecision, worry, fear and
lassitude are all over.
My greatest joy is obtained from playing my little game of deeds, of
finding something I can do for others in a helpful constructive way. And
although the joy is found in the doing, somehow these services have
never failed to return good for good, in the same coin, only with
multiplied interest, in the manner they were sent out.
As one of numerous instances of this kind, the case of Paul Harding comes easily to
my mind. Paul was one of those many thoughtful, retiring boys who are frequently
misunderstood, even by members of their own families, and who, as a
consequence of this misunderstanding, often get off on the wrong foot for a start in
life.
When I first knew Paul, I found him striving desperately to conceal his strong
emotional life behind a front of callous pretense, sophistication, indifference,
boredom. His efforts were pathetic. I saw behind these efforts the soul of a poet.
And when I had broken away his false restraints, he admitted that as long as he
could remember he had wanted to write verse. However, his early family life had
not been conducive to or sympathetic with his ambition. Instead of constructive
praise for his embryonic attempts, he had received ridicule, and this above all other
forms of discouragement, is positively murder to a sensitive soul.
I promptly responded to his ambition and asked him to let me see some of his
poems. He hadn't written any since he had been in prison, but with the interest I
showed in his ability to do so, he produced a little poem in his cell that night, and
strangely enough it displayed nothing of his pretense or the effects of his
environment. It was a crude piece. Even I could see that. But the potential poet was
there just the same. The theme of it was Pollyannaish. I advised him not to show it
to any one else ; for I well knew how it would be received and I also knew what
such a reception would do for him. Instead, I encouraged him and set him to work
writing more of them. And that was about the extent of my ability to help him. I
knew nothing about the technique of verse-making.
When I told Dad about my predicament he laughed. Well, you've got your foot in it,
he said. So you may just as well get a book on poetry and learn to write it yourself.
That's the only you can go any farther toward helping the boy.
And that is what I did. Paul and I studied verse-making together. And by and by we
entered into a sort of competitive race. The idea was to see who would have his
first poem published. Paul beat me with a fine little poem which was printed in his
county newspaper. From then on he was a regular contributor to this paper, and
later, before he left prison, a volume of his poems was brought out.
Now here is the way I profited through this bit of service. First, it was great fun.
Second, I learned enough about it to be able to write topical verses and humorous
verses, which I sold to magazines and newspapers under all kinds of names, and
with the money acquired in this way, I was able to employ a lawyer for a friend who
was innocent of the charge against him, a fact which was fully and completely
established when his lawyer obtained a new trial for him.
This money was later returned by my friend with an additional sum and was
promptly used over again towards the purchase of a community radio, the first one
to be put into this prison for our sole benefit. And what a boon it was! Especially
during the baseball season when we could get the returns of our favorite team play
by play, instead of having to wait until the next day to read it all through stale news
accounts.
I have said nothing about the real value of this poetry game as that value affected
the life of Paul Harding. Need I say more than this: he gave up crime for poetry; he
has prospered and so has society.
_________________________________________________

LOVE VERSUS PRISON DOOR OF IGNORANCE

CHAPTER IV

A boy is better unborn than untaught.


-Gascoigne.

There is one curse to which nearly all prisoners are subject, incomplete
education or no education at all.
It seems almost inconceivable that only a few years ago a great institution such as
the one in which I was incarcerated could have been without educational facilities
for its wards. But such was the condition. Not only was it a condition, but it was a
condition enforced by prison law. You were allowed to read such books as the
library afforded; but to be discovered with a pencil or writing paper in your
possession was equivalent to many days in solitary on bread and water.
One of the reasons institutional education was discouraged in this prison was
because of an inferiority complex on the part of its officials. Under the prevailing
wage scale for officials at that time, only a brutal and ignorant type of man could
be induced to take these jobs; and these men found a mutual interest in ignorant
prisoners ; but in prisoners superior to them in education, they found a deep and
abiding resentment. They were bitterly opposed to all forms of learning for
prisoners that, by contrast, would tend to emphasize their own lack of learning. If a
prisoner had been fortunate enough to have had the advantages of an education,
he soon discovered after entering the prison that he was in for hell, unless he was
shrewd enough at the outset to conceal his educational assets by assuming a pose
of ignorance. This was very often resorted to by educated prisoners.
Today this same prison has one of the finest educational systems in operation that
has ever been established in any prison. (or it did have when I left there a few
years ago). This school was functioning in conjunction with many big
correspondence schools throughout the country. After the grades had been passed,
the prison scholar could then avail himself of correspondence school training, which
embraced everything in the way of vocation, and profession, from the arts and
languages to business and the trades. Training was made compulsory up to the
fourth grade; beyond that it was optional with the prisoner. It was a sight for
earnest eyes to go into the big school room and see old men sitting side by side
with youngsters mastering their A B Cs. And in another section of the room, to see
eager hands trying to gain speed and efficiency on the typewriter; and in still other
sections, to see competent inmate teachers patiently but effectively instructing
their classes in all manner of specialities.
I do not say that this school is the finished result of any of my own efforts; but I can
and do say proudly that because I had learned about the power of love to contact
creative principle I was privileged to furnish the incentive or the nucleus around
which the idea speedily grew.
Imagine if you can, an institution that for almost a hundred years had been
managed on a system that exalted ignorance and low-rated knowledge. You would
say that such a habit of management, ingrained by a century of unrelieved custom
could hardly be uprooted in the course of a few months. That nevertheless, is
exactly what occurred.
Moreover, a college professor, a man of tremendous ability, was appointed to
organize and superintend the difficult undertaking. He not only established the
school, but he convinced those in power that a new school library was a necessary
adjunct to a school of this kind, and thus for the first time in the prison's history the
inmates could secure books of real educational value.
Of course, the idea first met with strong opposition both political and non-political.
It required considerable money to promote and realize an educational institution so
broad in scope as this one. There were those who argued that education, instead of
tending to correct criminals, would tend only to make of them a greater menace to
society. A slow-witted criminal had little chance against the well organized forces of
the law; but a criminal whose brain had been stimulated and developed through
the process of education would be vastly more competent in the commission of
crime. His imaginative faculties would become broader and more original; where he
had once been dull, he would become clever; his ability to look ahead would be
greatly enhanced, and thus he would be able to plan his crimes more efficaciously,
eliminating the weak spots in his programme of attack; where he had once
blundered into his crimes blindly, without considering the most important feature in
crime commission, the get-away, he would now be able to reason backward from a
well-planned get-away to the crime's commission, a process of thought beyond the
capacity of an ignorant criminal, but wholly within the powers of one whose mind
had been trained in the difficult art of coherent, analytical thinking.
Students of penology watched the prison school system with much interest and
speculation. Most of them were in accord with the movement. Most of them
believed that the surest way to convince a man that crime was a losing game in the
long run was to educate him to the point where he could see and understand this
maxim for himself; and that the best way to create a potential good citizen out of a
potential bad one, was first to arouse within him an intelligent self interest, and
then place before him the means to cultivate that interest along constructive lines
that entailed a knowledge of good citizenship and a desire to become a good
citizen if for no other reason than the one based upon self preservation, that it paid
to conform to existing social standards, even though to do so might often prove
tedious and unprofitable.
Whether or not this controversy was ever settled I do not know. But this I do know,
in my experience I observed more than a hundred confirmed criminals who,
because of this prison educational system, left prison to fill honest occupations that
had before been beyond their reach. Nor did I observe one among them who
returned to prison for committing another crime.

It is my honest belief that if it is possible to reform a person of anti-social


tendencies, there is no surer method to that end in existence than to turn
constructively such a person, through education, away from the old
tendencies by giving him new and more appealing ones to follow. There is
a sense of ought in the most hardened criminal. Ought I to pull this job, or
oughtn't I ? These are the preliminary questions to every crime
committed. And constructive education gives the constructive answer to
them more influence over the individual by making that answer more
reasonable and consequently more appealing. I believe penology's
strongest weapon is education.
In this prison I was the first man ever to be permitted the unheard-of privilege of
taking a correspondence course of study. At the time I had no idea how far-reaching
the results of this privilege would be. And the warden, who granted me the
privilege, of course established a precedent in doing so, and thus unwittingly let
the bars down for an avalanche of similar requests, which he could not refuse, and
which absolutely snowed him under.
He was bewildered when he called me into his office. I've made a mistake in letting
you have that course, he said. And then he pointed to a ten-inch stack of requests.
They're all the same. Fellows wanting to order courses. We have no mailing
facilities here for handling so much of this type of stuff. I'm afraid I've got my foot
in it. I didn't know there was such a craze in the world for education. God only
knows how I'll ever get out of it.
I knew, of course, that one of his ideas for getting out was to backtrack on the
original privilege granted me. I had to think fast in order to forestall this action. So I
said:
Warden, here's your chance to contribute a real service to society. It'll never pass
your way again. If you seize the opportunity now, your name will go down as one of
the outstanding prison executives of the world; but if you let the opportunity slip
you'll pass out with the next change of administration, just another prison warden
who served his time and drew his pay as wardens have done before him. Why don't
you put in a school ? Get a good man in charge of it and let him handle it in his own
way. In that manner the problem will solve itself so far as you're concerned.
By Jove! he exclaimed. That's an idea. I anticipate a fight. But I'm ready to go to the
bat.
And with that vigorous statement a hastily formulated dream of mine had its first
push forward toward fruition.
When I first thought of asking the warden for the privilege of taking a course of
study, I was fully aware that such a request, under ordinary circumstances, would
he briefly received and flatly rejected. Dad Trueblood and I talked the matter over,
and as always, Dad had only one method for attacking all problems -- the
method of contacting creative principle through the intermediary of love.
But how am I going to reach the warden ? How am I going to make my love known
to him?
Love, he said, needs no advance agent. When it's purely conceived and
powerfully felt, it will find its objective. It does not follow you: you follow
it. First you love, and then you act.
You mean I can prepare the warden in advance so that he will receive my
request with favor?
Not you. But love expressing through you will prepare him.
Without any effort on my part?
None but love. In fact, you need not go about him at all. Say, that's an
inspiration. Instead of you making the request of the warden, let your
friend on the outside do it, by mail.
Contrary to general opinion, it isn't so difficult to evoke a feeling of love
even for one's jailer. You can reason yourself into this emotion. That is
what I did in this case. And it worked out perfectly.
After all, I said to myself, prisons were a necessary evil in a civilization
that harbored the type of preying animal I had been. And if prisons were
necessary, so were wardens to manage them. This warden was merely
filling an inevitable duty, and if it wasn't him then it would be someone
else. Despite the disagreeable position he held, he was a man for all that,
with the same God-given spark that I possessed, the same potentialities
for good and evil. We were brothers under the skin. We were both headed
in the same direction, although our paths had not always run parallel. He
had his troubles the same as I. His faults were no worse than mine. In a
word, he, as every mortal born to struggle up through trial and error, was
more entitled to love and understanding than to censure. Who was I to sit
in judgment? Had not the Master of men said, Woman where are thine
accusers? And refused to judge her Himself when He noted all had slunk
away.
In this manner of reasoning one unavoidably comes to the place where
censorship ends, and where censorship ends true love begins. [Judgement
centered in Love is for correction (probation) not damnation - God's fire is
the purging process of bring forth perfection].
It took me only a very short while to arouse within me a deep responsive
feeling of love for the warden, and it grew and grew as I continued to
search his inner being for the Christ-like traits that were the heritage of
every human being.
Finally I began to visualize him in all manner of constructive,
humanitarian activities. I saw him courageously doing the right thing,
although he well knew that the right thing was not the popular thing for
him to do. I saw him with my request in his hand; I sympathized with him
when he passed through a wavering period of indecision; I bowed in
inward gratitude when his eyes took on the light of victory over self and
indecision fell away from him as he determined to do the constructive
thing and allow me to have my course of study.
In the meantime I had written to my friend explaining my desire and
asking her to inform me of the exact hour and date her letter to the
warden was to go forward. In this manner I was able to arrive at the date
and hour the letter would reach the warden's desk. Through another
source I found out the exact time the warden sat down to examine his
mail. And thus at this time I visualized him with my friend's letter in his
hand. As I watched him reading it, I let my love close in around him until
he seemed to be completely enveloped in it to the exclusion of every
other vibratory influence. [Daily evokes a scripture, not from the reading,
but from the Spirit; calleth those which be not as though they were -
Romans 4:17].
I would not say this was scientific procedure. Some of you may even laugh it off as
being the antics of a simpleton. I wouldn't presume to state that such an effort on
my part had anything to do with the warden's decision. But I do say that his
decision was made precisely as I wanted him to make it.

Through this course of study I was able to prepare myself for an honest,
constructive future. I left prison at a time when the depression had just reached its
peak, when competition in the labor market was as great as it ever has become. It
might be that without this preparatory work I could have gone out in the world and
competed successfully with skilled and unskilled millions. It might be that my
prison and criminal record, all that I possessed in the way of reference, would have
offered no handicap to me in my effort to secure a place in the world of honest
endeavor.
But in the event the situation had not panned out in this manner, which would have
been at least quite possible -- what then?
Maud Ballington Booth once wrote a book under the title After Prison, What ? A man
may go out of prison with the very best of intentions, but if he is unprepared, if he
is worse off than when he entered prison, his intentions are likely to meet with
opposition too strong to be endured. Nothing will so take the starch from an ex-
prisoner's stiff resolutions like rebuff and indifference. As soon as he becomes
thoroughly convinced that he is not wanted, the step between that point and his
old life becomes a mighty easy one to take.
I remember a resolution I once made of the kind as I was leaving prison after
serving my first term. I had been given a parole. The town I went to on parole had a
shoe factory in it, and by telling a few skillful lies I managed to get a job in this
factory. It was a good job, too. It paid excellent wages on a piece work basis. And
the novelty of earning an honest living had a certain appeal about it, which I
responded to with considerable satisfaction.
In the evening after a good bath and hearty supper I would stretch out an my bed
and declare to myself, By golly, this is not so bad. There was a definite lift to this
business of achieving a laudable day's work; a decided sense of security about it
that was wholly new and tremendously gratifying. If the thing hadn't happened that
did happen shortly afterwards, I might have, then and there, reconditioned myself
to honest habits of a lasting nature.
But one noon-day, as I hurried up the street from the factor on my way to a
restaurant, someone hailed me from across the street, using a name of mine that
sent a tremor of fear through me. No one in this town knew me by that name, or so
I thought. Turning I saw a detective coming across the street to greet me. It had
been he who had arrested me for the crime I had just finished a prison term to
expiate. His face was aglow with a broad smile. His hand was extended in
friendship.
Glad to see you out, he exclaimed. When did it happen? What are you doing?
I explained I had been out several weeks; that I w as on probation, that I was
working down at the shoe factory.
Fine, he said. I for one am with you one hundred percent. I want to see you make
good. Listen, just lay off the pool halls and other joints around here, and you'll pull
the grade. I'm here now. I'm with the railroad. Dammit, if the sledding gets tough,
come out to my house. We'll make you acquainted with the right sort of people.
There's no need for you to get lonesome.
I was amazed at the man's attitude. I wondered if I had previously misjudged him. I
returned to the factor feeling a little relieved but shaky in the region of my solar
plexus. I had been at work about an hour when I was notified the superintendent
wished to see me in his office. I felt the old sardonic sneer welling up in me. I
remember saying to the floor boss who conveyed the message to me, Well, I guess
this is the end of a perfect day. A minute later, I was asked if I had ever served time
in prison. Of course, I well knew who had informed on me. The detective had gone
straight from his Judas kiss to the superintendent and advised him that an ex-
convict was in his employ.
I admitted the fact with a sarcastic barb at the whole world. The superintendent
was sorry that the rules of the company forbade, and so forth.
You needn't be, I told him. I'm out of place here anyway. I'm glad I got by long
enough to buy a good gun. That's my racket. It's all I know. Give me my check and
I'll be out on my way in a jiffy.
I walked away from that job with a poisoned heart and a bitter resolution eating
into my brain like a cancer. It took some time to dull the edge of that mood. In the
meantime I did some reckless things against the social order before I finally
stopped with another prison sentence.

I have said elsewhere that reformation to be effective and permanent must be


accomplished by transcending old habits; by reconditioning one's self to new habits
of thought and behavior.
To this end the average prisoner will neither respond to reason nor
persuasion, harsh treatment nor kind. But, quite to the contrary, he will
readily respond to an educational program with an inspirational tone to it,
the quality that arouses self interest, and offers a positive means to a
broader mode of living for him. When such a program fails, the man is
hopeless so far as human influence is concerned. Nothing save an act of
Providence can swerve him from his downward path.
As an illustration of what education can accomplish where all other methods have
failed, I wish to recount, briefly, the cases of two men, not because I was privileged
to play a minor part in their salvation, but more to show that even the worst of
human timber can be salvaged from the gulf of destruction and rendered useful to
society when the educational method has been made available to them.
Spider Ross was young in years, but old in experience. He was one of those
borderline cases the criminologists like to study. That he was criminally insane the
doctors had no doubt. But always convictions for crime and sentences in Spider's
many mishaps sent him to prison instead of the criminal insane asylum.
Spider was one of those shifty-eyed, loose-lipped, pasty-faced crooks of the petty
variety. A kleptomaniac, I believe they call them in professional terminology. He
could neither read nor write his own name. He walked with the swaggering
defiance of ignorance, and so far as any one could judge from mere observation, he
possessed nothing but a surface, and a shallow surface at that. Apparently his only
ambition was to live his own life and be allowed to brag about it as he liked.
When the prison school was established, Spider of course became what they called
a list man, that is, his name was on the list of those to whom training was made
compulsory. I worked beside Spider, and when he heard they were going to force
him to attend school, he promptly revolted. I'll go, he told me, but they can't make
me learn anything.
It didn't take me long to realize that the school could be of little service to Spider so
long as he held this attitude. I took his problem to the school superintendent and
asked him to allow me to handle Spider's case. He agreed to my request, and I
thereupon removed Spider's name from the list. When the list-bearers made the
round to notify the others the day school was to start, Spider was passed up.
Though he said nothing, it was plain he had taken the event as a slight and was
very much disappointed. He wanted to tell the list-bearer a mouthful, as he put it.
The school was a roaring success from the start. In the shop there was no other
topic of conversation. Enthusiasm ran riot. Spelling matches were begun;
arithmetic problems were pondered over and solved. Every one had a stack of
school-books he carried back and forth. The more literate prisoners turned from
topics of crime to topics of history, government, economics, and so on. World's
Almanacs were borrowed from the new library with which to settle disputes. Spider
found himself completely disassociated from his fellows. Everywhere he went the
conversation had to do with school subjects. After the tasks were all in, the
prisoners would form groups, each on its own intellectual level, and get off in a
private place to discuss their next day's assignments. If Spider approached one of
these groups he would remain only a moment, because he had no mutual interest
there. It was practically a case of unintentional ostracism.
Spider was in the position where a feller needs a friend. And his extremity proved
my opportunity. When he could talk to no one else, I talked to him as we worked. I
talked to him about the thrill one got from trying to learn things. Slowly but surely,
his interest rose. Then one day he asked me why they had left his name off the
school list. I replied by suggesting that he must have requested it. He was vigorous
in his denial of this.
Well, I guess they figured you weren't interested in school, I countered.
I don't see why, he said, I didn't say so.
But maybe they figured you thought so. Actions speak louder than words
sometimes, you know.
He wondered if it was too late to get in. I thought I could arrange it for him. But he
would have to study hard in order to catch up with the rest.
And so Spider Ross the next day found himself for the first time in his life on the
inside of a class room. No doubt he was an exception, but once he was started and
had mastered the first difficult steps, after he had learned to read a little, his thirst
for more knowledge became an exaggerated mania, the talk of the prison. In two
school terms he absorbed what was equivalent to an eighth grade education. Every
one was amazed at his capacity to assimilate complicated subjects. He was never
without a book within his reach. As he operated his machine the book stood
propped open before him.
At the beginning of this third school term, he took up business, shorthand and
typing in conjunction with a correspondence course in salesmanship. At the close of
the term he was placed in one of the most difficult steno graphical positions in the
prison where question and answer dictation had to be taken with the speed of a
court reporter. While holding down this job, he found time to continue his studies,
to invent a dozen or so different kinds of gadgets, which he planned to copyright
later, and to write two excellent books on salesmanship, one under the title The
Psychology of Depression and the other, Depression Salesmanship.
Spider left prison in the midst of the depression. His methods for making personal
capital out of national hard times were all set forth practicality and convincingly in
his books. That he demonstrated his theories, I haven't the slightest doubt in the
world, although I heard nothing more of him after he had taken his departure.
I reiterate, his was doubtless an exceptional case. When a man can start from the
lowest level of ignorance and criminal insanity, and in three years' time win a place
of position of trust within his prison, and prepare himself as he did for a position of
trust outside his prison, such an achievement is not only exceptional, it is
phenomenal.
The important thing is, however, that he did it. The important thing to
society. Institutional education had taken an obvious social menace in
Spider Ross and transformed him into a social servant. Thus I have found
it: education lifts the consciousness of the prisoner it touches, instead of
contributing to the furtherance of his criminal tendencies.
And again we see in Spider's case, how first there was developed an
intense thirst or love for knowledge, which set the creative principle to
building in an opposite direction. Before his love medium had been for
destructive things and such things had been created through him. With
the love medium reversed, the creative principle could do nothing else
but create in the new direction. As the love medium tends the creative
law inclines.

The case of Harry Simmons was quite different from that of Spider Ross in one way,
but the result was similar in that through the prison school both had been able to
find themselves and their particular niches in life.
Harry had attended college, was an excellent scholar and possessed a high
standard of taste toward the cultural things. He could discuss academics with a glib
and perfect accent. He was typically a young intellectual, a trifle egotistical,
somewhat snobbish, and vastly intolerant toward those whose frontal bones failed
to measure up to the lofty dimensions of his own.
At some point in his educational career he had come under the influence of a
certain German philosopher. This philosopher propounded a super-man doctrine
which, in the hands of a person more impressionable than stable, held a dangerous
interpretation, an interpretation altogether ruthless and inhuman. Indeed, it was
Harry Simmons' misinterpretation of a brainy man's philosophical doctrines that
paved the way for his pride to prison.
Live hard and dangerously, was the credo this philosopher laid down for the
guidance of the super-man. Meaning, of course, that it was the duty of the super-
man to dare the faggots of ignorance by living and teaching in advance of his time.
Poor Harry thought the philosopher meant that the super-man, being so brilliant as
to appreciate the shortness of mortal life, should crowd into it as much vice and
merry-making as he possibly could.
So he became a hard and dangerous liver. He naturally found such living expensive.
At first he gambled for the wherewithal; and later he tried forgery. After his parents
had bankrupted themselves trying to keep him out of prison over a period of
several years, they were finally obliged to stand aside and see their prodigal take it
on the chin for a five years' stretch.
Harry had what they called a political job in our shop. He wore a white shirt instead
of the regulation hickory. He was a garment checker and shipping clerk. He was not
liked because of his highbrow attitude and he was difficult to reach because of the
thick veneer of know-it-all-ness he had drawn about him.
At any rate, I decided that Harry had too good a start in life to let himself drift down
the purple tide and wind up in his old age a doddering prison lag, sitting around in
the idle house of his final prison home spinning yarns about his many exploits, and
comparing the conditions in this prison to the conditions in that one. But while I
made up my mind to attack him with the weapon of love, I decided at the same
time to use argument, since he loved to argue above any other pastime.
I crossed verbal swords with him one day with an introductory remark that set his
blood boiling.
Say, I said, most unexpectedly to him, what do they teach guys like you in college ?

To mind their own business for one thing, he shot back.


Oh, I thought they taught them to write checks on the old folks' bank account.
Is that so! Well, get an earful of this. They also teach them how to use their fists, if
you happen to think you're lucky.
I don't resort to violence, I said with a broad grin on my face. He promptly thawed
out, and we were soon talking about his favorite topic, the philosophy of the super-
man. We argued off and on for several days before he was willing to accede to my
constantly reiterated point that any philosophy was a failure, unless the person
embracing it could show that it had done him good instead of harm.
After drawing this admission from him, I pointed out that the same thing could be
said of a college education; that although college men had a great advantage over
non-college men, the latter by making opportunity out of the little they had, often
succeeded in life, while the college man who refused to see the opportunity in the
much possessed, failed in the practical business of life, that of growing and getting
ahead.
These discussions, carried on at odd times daily, created a mutual bond between
us, a thing that I had been working for, because I wanted to touch upon a most
delicate subject later on, one that only friendship could take without resentment. I
wanted to show him and make him realize what he had done to his parents,
especially his mother, by dragging down the many excellent opportunities they had
made possible for him.
He told me later that I was the only person on earth who could have brought these
things home to him without giving offence. He was glad I had done it. Also, for the
first time, our discussions made him conscious of the fact that, instead of copying
his favorite philosopher's virtues, he had been twisting those virtues into vices and
copying them.
As you probably have already divined, Harry Simmons had scoffed at the idea of a
prison school for convicts. He had said that ninety per cent of the guys in this
prison were too dumb to learn anything if they were kept in school a million years.
He had evinced a great pity for the poor boobs who would have to act as teachers.
He had also said that was one job he would not do under any inducement or
pressure. He preferred the dungeon to such a job.
But Harry Simmons did become a teacher in the prison school. He sought the job,
and he filled it in an exemplary manner. He had a Spanish and English class that
positively worshiped him. He became the professor's most valuable assistant and
he, more than any one else, was responsible for some of the finest features that
the school possessed. In a word, he became a prison school enthusiast, and served
the cause early and late to make it an outstanding success, and in this way squelch
the criticism that still rumbled ominously here and there.
On commencement days, held in the big auditorium, with many noted educators
from various places present to study the effects of the system, it was Harry's
privilege to make the address which outlined the accomplishments of that
semester and voiced the hopes of the one immediately to follow, for this school
had only a very short holiday period.
How different was the philosophy this boy propounded in these addresses to that
which he had brought with him to prison! He was like a new creature. As he would
warm with enthusiasm, he was like a man who had caught a powerful vision, and
was eager to convey the inspiration of it to those who were still floundering about
in search of themselves, as he had been.
Harry was not a pupil in this prison school seeking an education, but he got about
as much out of it as any pupil there. It was not education he obtained, but re-
education.
Harry was still there when I pulled out. But he's gone by this time, and I would be
willing to wager a goodly fortune that he'll never go back to that prison or any
other.
One of the best debates the forum ever promoted was between Harry and an
equally brilliant fellow on the philosopher Nietzsche. As I sat and listened I glowed
inwardly with gratitude when the youngster revealed to me he had at last gotten
close to the real Nietzsche and had reasoned away the shadow he had been
following of that greatest of all original thinkers.
_________________________________________________

LOVE VERSUS PRISON DOOR OF VIOLENCE

CHAPTER V

Whoever lives true life, will love true love.


-Browning.

According to the law, to have guilty knowledge of a crime, before or after, makes
you equally guilty, providing you fail to divulge that knowledge to the proper
authorities. On the other hand, according to the unwritten law of the underworld, to
divulge knowledge of a crime makes you guilty of informing, and the penalty for
this is death.
I believe there is such a thing in the universe as the law of Personal Position; that
there is a right and wrong place to be at any given time; that if you are in your right
place you will have nothing to fear in the way of attracting adverse compensation;
but that every time you put yourself in a place where you have no business to be, a
penalty of some kind will be exacted.
It was through no intention to be nosey or curious that I found myself in the
following predicament; but since law is no respecter of good or bad intentions,
ignorance, or any other excusing circumstances, I was faced with a situation that
looked anything but pleasing.
There was a stock room in the shop where I worked in which all the supplies were
kept. If a machine operator happened to ruin one of his pieces, it was his business
to call the supply man, apprise him of his need, and wait at his machine until he
brought an extra piece to replace the ruined one.
On this occasion I had attempted to re-notch one of my collar bands and had cut
too deeply into the cloth. I looked around and not seeing the supply man about the
floor, I thought I might save time by going in search of him. I got up and strolled
back to the stock room. Noticing the door partly ajar I went in with the intention of
serving myself. While I was carrying out this notion, from the other side of the
supply bins the subdued sound of three voices reached me. They were plotting an
escape. I knew the owner of each voice. And before I could make a quiet departure,
I learned that the plot involved the lives of two men, one a guard, the other a
prisoner.
I got out of the room and back to my machine. But I had been seen by one of the
plotters who had not been present at the session just described, but who was
aware that such a session was in progress at the time I entered. This man's
suspicions were immediately aroused and he promptly labeled me a spy, hoping to
gain information whereby I might feather my own nest, possibly gain my own
freedom at their expense.
It was one of those situations in which many a prisoner has found himself and from
which many a prisoner has died mysteriously without the prison authorities ever
learning who did it or why it was done.
As soon as possible this fellow conveyed his knowledge and suspicions to the
leader of the plot, a man with a tough reputation and a desperate desire for
freedom. For obvious reasons, I cannot use the leader's name here, but for
convenience I shall refer to him vaguely as Muggs.
For some reason, a very fortunate reason, by the way, for me, Muggs decided upon
a course of action different from that usually pursued in such cases. Instead of
remaining silent and keeping me in ignorance of the fact that they were aware I
had knowledge of their plans, Muggs called me to one side and said :
I ain't never knowed you to snitch; but I do know you've gone hay-wire since you
done that last jolt in the hole (dungeon). We're goin' on through with this, an' you're
goin' with us---or else! You've declared yourself in, an' now you're gonna stay in.
Without hesitation he informed me of the part I was to play. Also, it there occurred
any hitch in their plans, he made it unmistakably clear that I would be held
responsible.
During the noon hour one prisoner, a trusty, was allowed the privilege of remaining
in the shop instead of having to return to his cell after lunch. Now that I was one of
the plotters, there were five of us in all, one of them being the fellow in charge of
supply room. Just before time to line up for the noon march to the mess hall, this
man was to pass us into the stock room unobserved, where we would hide until the
rest of the prisoners had filed out, and the guard had gone to the officers' dining
room for his lunch. Then when the trusty had returned from the mess hall and
entered the shop, we were to capture him, perhaps kill him if it was later thought
advisable. Likewise we were to follow the same procedure when the guard again
put in his appearance.
The captured or killed guard was to be disarmed and stripped of his, uniform, which
I was to don. Then Muggs, with the guard's gun on my back, followed by the other
three plotters, were to march me in front of them to the back wall gate, where I
would order the wall guard to throw down his gun and the gate key, it being
presumed, of course, that he would mistake me for one of his fellow officers. In
case the wall guard became stubborn he was to be shot from his perch with
promptness and dispatch.
Had there been within me a desire for freedom in the same degree as this desire
actuated the plotters, I should have still deplored their methods in attempting to
obtain it. Every item of their plot was based upon violence and the crudest sort of
violence in the bargain.
While I could plainly see a dozen different weaknesses in their scheme, any one of
which, after murder had been committed, would have made their capture
inevitable and their ultimate death in the electric chair an absolute certainty, they
could not see these flaws, because they had permitted their objective to blind them
to everything but the objective itself.
I was soon made to understand by Muggs that my advice was unsought and
unwelcome. My position in the plot was not to reason why, but to do or die.
Certainly I was on the spot, to use the vernacular. At this moment only one course
was open to me, and that I promptly rejected, not because of fear but because of
principle. Of this principle there are grounds for a wide divergence of opinion. Some
may think it lacked what a moral principle should have, the sense of duty toward
others, and that it was my duty to inform the authorities that such a plot was being
hatched and the lives of two men and possibly three were being threatened.
I wish to make plain my attitude, therefore, and to make clear the objection I
previously mentioned regarding the use of violence.
Had I turned informer against my fellow prisoners, that act in itself would not have
embraced violence, but it would have resulted in violence. Those against whom I
informed would have been subjected to third degree methods in an effort to make
them admit the plot, or to confirm any information. But this would not have been
the end of violence. By and by I would have had to reckon with the men I had
betrayed; either I would have to kill one or more of them in self defense, or be
killed by them. In the meantime my act of treachery would have brought down
upon me the frightful curse of ostracism, and would have thus destroyed the
influence I had begun to exercise for good among my fellows.
Luckily there was one man I could trust to share my secret in return for his advice,
my old reliable cell-buddy, Dad Trueblood.
The old man admitted that I was in a ticklish place between two fires. But, he
added, there never was a problem that could not be solved by love, and this one is
no exception.
To this I agreed. But I could see no way to induce more love than I already felt for
these men. Because I was able to see clearly what they could not see, my
sympathy for them was vast. Yet they had not and apparently would not respond to
it to the extent of allowing me an equal voice in the plot.
You'll have to get their confidence through the voice of action, Dad said. You'll see,
you're no longer in their class. They look at you as one who has gone the reform
route. You've got to make a sacrifice and make it appear that you've gone hard-
boiled again. You've got to get yourself in trouble and go to the hole. I'll fix it up
with the warden.
But I don't want the warden to know of it, I broke in quickly.
Of course you don't. Do you think I'd be that big a fool. I'll tell him you have a
different reason. He knows you're using all kinds of schemes to help guys in here. I
doubt if he'll even want to know a reason.
Thus one day a short while later, I surprised the entire shop by refusing to work.
The guard's duty, of course, was clear. He told me three times to return to my
machine. I argued with him in a loud angry voice that every one could hear. I
thought for a minute I was in for a hard blow on the head, as the guard became
angry himself at my display of insolence. He told me a fourth time to go to my
place or he would send for the man (deputy warden), and I told him to go ahead.
While I waited for the deputy to show up, I strolled down the floor past Muggs'
machine. Out of the corner of his mouth he said :
Don't weaken. They can't do any more than give you the works, an' they ain't
gonna do that.
Don't worry, I replied, their hole don't bluff me any. I've been in it plenty of times.
What's the matter? Muggs asked.
I just ain't feeling good today is all. And they want me to work any way. They can
lead a horse to water but they can't make him drink.
I put in fifteen days on bread and water and was then sent back to work. The price I
paid to gain a point was pretty stiff. But when you consider the fact that my gesture
doubtlessly saved the lives of several men, the cost will appear small indeed. The
point I gained was, of course, the mutual respect and confidence of Muggs and his
fellow plotters. With this confidence and respect I was given a voice in their plot
councils, and in this manner I had no difficulty in pointing out the weak spots in the
whole scheme, the hazards involved, and the inevitable consequences incumbent
upon failure. In other words, I was able to reduce the plot to glamourless realism,
and after I had accomplished that the desire for freedom had lost about ninety per
cent of its erstwhile appeal.
All of these men served out their terms in the slow but safe way. I had convinced
them that, while freedom was a wonderful prize to win, violence was a dangerous
method through which to gamble for it.
One of the strong arguments for institutional education is that it tends to eliminate
prison plots of violence. Any plot entering the mind of an ignorant person fails to
bring with it the fine points in execution that the same plot brings when it enters
the mind of a person trained to reason and analyze. Most of the prison uprisings
are conceived in the childish brain of one man whose original motive is an
abnormal desire to gain notoriety and thus bask for awhile in the limelight and
adulation of his equally ignorant and subnormal fellows. Occasionally an educated
prisoner or criminal is forced, through the intervention of unexpected
circumstances, to resort to violent methods; but such methods are seldom a part of
his original plans.
When an educated prisoner plans an escape, he goes about it in a scientific
manner. He works through a process of elimination, and the things he eliminates
are all the possible features that might compel him into an act of violence. He plans
intelligently for success; but in case of failure he doesn't wish to be faced with the
grim prospect of having to pay for a string of violent actions.
Prison officials fear the shrewdness of their educated charges; but they never fear
for their lives in dealing with them.

By employing the love medium, I was able to save several men from such
consequences as would have befallen Muggs and the rest of us had their ill-planned
plot gone through. The following case will show how much easier it is to reach an
educated person under similar circumstances. But again I must refrain from using
the man's name. Therefore we shall merely call him Frank.
In this case I was taken into Frank's confidence without having to inveigle my way
in through trickery or persuasion. Frank had been plotting his escape for several
months. Finally he arrived at the place where he thought he had reduced the plot to
its ultimate perfection. He could search through it from beginning to end and no
flaw would appear.
And still-- and here is the difference between an educated man's plotting and the
plotting of an ignorant or partly educated man -- although Frank could pick out no
flaw in his plot, the intuition that goes with intelligence, warned him against
becoming too cock-sure. He had been close to his plot for a long time. Perhaps he
had been too close; so close that some apparently trifling detail had escaped his
notice; and this very detail might be the one glaring flaw, if he could only get far
enough away from his plot to see it.
So far Frank had planned alone, another characteristic of the educated prison
plotter. Frank and I were the very best of friends. The reason he had failed to
confide in me before was not because he feared to trust me, but because he feared
I would attempt to dissuade him from carrying out his intention.
He came to me now and laid his plans out, knowing full well that I would scrutinize
them with a fresh mind and expose any weaknesses that he himself had been
unable to find. He had obtained a small piece of an old file. With this and a knitting
needle he had made a pick with which he could unlock the window to the shop
machinist's cage and thus reach through to a tray of hacksaws entrusted to the
machinist's care. His idea was to watch the machinist in the evening when he
checked his tools in the presence of the warder; after which he would wait for an
opportunity to act unobserved, unlock the window and possess himself of one of
the saws, and then relock the window. With the saw and a bolt of shirt cloth, which
he intended to smuggle from the shop, his plan was to cut the bars on his cell,
climb to the top of the cell block, cut a padlock on one of the big ventilating
cupolas, and through this make his way to the roof, where he would make fast one
end of his cloth rope and slide to the ground.
Your plan is all right, Frank, I told him. But suppose it doesn't work. There's always
an element of chance in the most perfectly planned getaway, you know. What if
you fail ?
Well, he said, I'll just go to the hole for a few days. I don't expect to injure anybody;
so if I do get caught it won't amount to much.
You haven't considered the machinist, I replied. He's in here for murder, and if I
were you I wouldn't want to take much of a chance on his temper.
Why, I wouldn't be hurting him any.
No. Maybe not. But he's responsible for those saws. And if you took one in the way
you planned to, he would have a hard time explaining what became of it. As a
matter of fact he would be accused of aiding you. Of course if you succeeded in
getting away he would have to take his punishment without the possibility of
getting revenge on you for doing this dirty trick on him. But if you didn't get away
I'm afraid it would be too bad for you.
I could tell them I stole the saw.
They wouldn't believe it. And even if they were inclined to give the machinist the
benefit of the doubt set up in your confession, he would have lost his job, although
he escaped the other punishment. They would not trust a man in his job to whom
the slightest suspicion can be attached.
Frank pursued his plans no further. While his plot appeared to him free of violence
in so far as its execution was concerned, he had failed to see the violence inherent
in its results. Even though he had successfully escaped, the machinist, innocent
though he was, would have had to pay bitter for his success.
Personally I cannot believe that any success gained at the misfortune of another,
can have a permanent value. For many years I tried to make violence pay: but
always violence made me pay.
It is true that men appear to succeed at the expense of their fellowmen. Whether or
not that success gives them the pleasure it is thought to give there, is another
question. One thing is certain, there is no spiritual gratification possible where
violence enters in. And, speaking from my own experience, if there is any pleasure
in life where moral and spiritual gratification is absent I have failed to find it.
During the past six years I've gained a spiritual inch or so. I would not barter that
inch for all the gold, all the fame, and all the worldly honor in existence. I've had
gold, quantities of it, crooked gold, and I've paid in a million different ways for
every tainted ounce of it.

One of the penalties of success achieved by violence is that it must be constantly


guarded by violence. It was no pleasure for me to ride in a high-priced car and be
always on the alert for a spattering of machine-gun bullets from the guns of my
rivals in crime. When you so live that in every man you see an enemy, there is
small feeling of security in the touch of a pistol at your side. You may put a pistol
under your pillow at night, but the action proves of little value in the way of
inducing sleep. Nor may it give you much satisfaction to know that every
penitentiary is waiting to receive you; that every electric chair has a claim on your
patronage; that every noose hangs in readiness to twine itself round your neck.
I have found nothing more lastingly pleasurable than that which I possess
today. I have nothing that selfish greed might envy. Therefore I need no
gun to protect it. After an honest day's work, I can sit down in my home
and with my family round me enjoy the quiet simple life of mutual love
and spiritual harmony. If some one drops in, and this frequently occurs,
bearing with him or her the weight of a troubled heart, we look upon such
a visitor, not as an unwelcome guest, but as welcome opportunity to
serve the one cause in the world that gives permanent gratification. In
the atmosphere of our home, troubles and worries are soon dissolved,
clear thinking re-established, and those who seek us with their problems
usually leave with those problems solved. We preach to no one; but we
have a philosophy that is creative, and in that philosophy there is no
room for fear and worry. We try to make people see that fear and worry
are not always constructive; that these qualities create problems and
troubles; that love and clear thinking turn problems into experiences, and
experiences into the gold of knowledge; that where there is knowledge
there is security, and where there is security there is livingness in its
highest sense of satisfaction.
And when the last symphony has died away in our radio; when our books have
been put aside; when our evening meditation has been stamped upon the
subjective heavens, and we have retired to our pillows, the sweetest blessing in life
comes stealing over us, perfect slumber.
To be able to lie down in positive security with unlocked doors, and never turn over
until another day has dawned, that is one of the gains I wouldn't exchange for all
the kingdoms that have been built upon the leaping flames of violence.
There are two forms of violence, the passive and the active. Both are destructive,
but not in the same degree. While active violence invariably reaches out to destroy
other people and things, the passive form remains at home to destroy the person
alone who harbors it. Of the two forms the latter is the most deadly to its subject,
because it finds no relief in action or active expression, but remains suppressed
with in the individual, poisoning his nervous system, unbalancing his emotional life,
arresting his powers of rational thought -- all of which set up dangerous reflexes in
his physical organism, which often result in grave nervous and mental disorders,
while these in turn condition the body for numerous diseases, both real and
hysterical, which very frequently prove fatal.
The unfortunate victim of passive violence is a physical, moral and mental coward.
His cowardice furnishes the driving motive for his cruel instincts. He seeks escape
from the condemnation his own mind tortures him with through the vicarious
method of imagination. Deploring his own weakness, he envies the courage in
others. He lacks the intestinal stamina to kill an insect, but in his imagination he
visualizes himself ruthlessly crushing every one who opposes the things he would
like to do. He is a killer who never kills; he is a tyrant whose tyranny touches no
one but himself. He is a pathetic creature in a world that offers him no honor, no
self respect, no social adjustment, no privilege of advancement.
The prisons are full of such victims. They are usually confined for moral crimes,
because they lack necessary courage to commit crimes that involve physical
danger. And since the nature of their crimes is such as it is, they are detested by
their fellows; because, strange as it may seem, one criminal will appear to sicken at
a certain type of crime committed by another.
These victims, however, are quickly responsive to love and understanding. Because
of this I was able to help a few toward a more mature emotional life.
The case of Emmett Edwards comes speedily to mind. Emmett knew but one
penalty to mete out to those with whom he disagreed. They should be shot, or
hanged, or broken on some mediaeval instrument of torture. He was the shyest
person I've ever seen and the most colossal coward.
If the fellow with whom he happened to be celling made life miserable for him, he
endured the condition rather than face the deputy warden with a request for a
change of cells. He simply could not screw up enough courage to face an official.
And when he could not avoid such a calamity, the ordeal would leave him limp for a
week to follow. He shrank from the boisterous crudeness of his comrades. He was
afraid of crowds. He always agreed verbally for fear of being drawn into an
argument. He shrank from entering the general shower-bath; or of being exposed
to a medical examination; or to the examination conducted in the prison bureau of
criminal identification. He feared the possibility of being reported for violating
prison rules, or of being called upon to perform some task exposing him to the
scrutiny and possible criticism of others. He feared both life and death. And he
sought escape from all his fears by nursing a secret violence against anything and
everything. Although this false escape channel was sufficient in itself to destroy
him in time, when he added physical self abuse to it he was in possession of an
annihilating combination that would be satisfied with nothing short of complete
wreckage.
At the time I singled him out for laboratory experimentation, his face was drawn
and sallow, his eyes were hollow with black circles round them. The skin on his
neck had begun to crease, it was thick and oily. His head was becoming pinched at
the temples, the brow was tightening, his lips were drawing back from his teeth,
giving his features the appearance of an eternal grin, or silly grimace. His hands
had a sickly yellowish color, and the nails had the bloodless blue of heavy or
sluggish circulation. He was emaciated and his mind was already touched by
feebleness.
Summing him up briefly, I classified him, first, as a victim of passive violence, and
second, as a victim of both passive and active violence, the latter being aimed at
himself. At first I scarcely knew which one of these types of violence to attack first.
Dad Trueblood suggested that the elimination of the one would have a strong
tendency to eliminate the other along with it. Obviously, however, the violence he
was expressing actively against himself as the most urgent consideration, since it
was doing the greatest amount of physical and mental harm at the moment.
Emmett had reached the place on his march to destruction where the line between
sanity and insanity is very thin. One of the peculiar features of these borderline
cases is that they become supersensitive at this point to an almost unbelievable
degree. They can tell in an instant whether they are being watched covertly, and
thoughts, especially if they are adverse, directed toward them are picked up with
the ease and accuracy of a radio receiving set.
For about a week I treated Emmett silently with the constructive thoughts of love.
At first he showed every indication of being greatly disturbed by them. He would
fidget and strive to locate their source by trying to catch their sender in the act of
looking at him. His reaction to the influence was different. That much he could feel.
He had become more or less inured to the critical thoughts his follows had been
holding for him; but these thoughts of love -- there was something foreign about
them that sent him to reacting involuntarily in a most uncomfortable way.
By and by, however, the influence of love acting upon creative principle, began to
have the desired effect, that of soothing and calming its object. He came to
recognize this influence as being pleasant. He could sense that others had the
power to disturb it when they came near him to speak, and he resented this, and
would avoid it whenever possible. But when I finally approached him to carry out
my campaign of suggestion, he found that I did not disturb him; that instead of
feeling a sense of repulsion he experienced a feeling of attraction. And this was the
ground work I had been wanting to lay.
In this boy's case and my connection with it, I learned what friendship is and what a
friend really means to one who all his life had starved for the things only a friend
has power to give. A friend, I discovered, is one with whom you can share yourself
completely: your secrets, your sins, your weaknesses, your hopes and
disappointments -- all your faults, your failures and your triumphs. A friend is one
with whom you can be the real you. A friend is one in whom you can place the last
full measure of trust and know it will never be misplaced.
To Emmett I became that sort of friend. There wasn't a secret that he didn't divulge
to me. He took me back into his childhood, and there he described for me one
incident that gave me the cause for his life of cowardly misery.
It happened on his first day at school and his first encounter with that species of
cruelty that only school children can inflict upon their fellows. Emmett had been
challenged to do battle, and although he gamely accepted the challenge and for a
while annoyed his larger opponent, the conflict grew too warm for him and he
hollered nuff from his underneath position on the battle ground.
The ridicule that followed branded him forever as a coward. He was never allowed
to hear the end of it. He heard it from his own brothers and sisters and even his
father, and he finally came to accept it as an inevitable part of him.
Since the cause of cowardice in his case had been the result of physical defeat, I
promptly concluded that the reconditioning process should begin by establishing a
sense of physical courage, while at the same time stimulating a desire in his mind
for and pride in the possibilities of his body.
To this end I made arrangements for a magazine that dealt with physical culture.
Then I began mild scuffing matches with him. These developed into boxing
matches. And finally I induced him to don the gloves with me before an
enthusiastic circle of fans.
By permitting him to give me a pretty rough pummelling on this occasion, his self
confidence rose to egotistical heights, and every day thereafter I found myself
being invited to do a few rounds, which I of course accepted, but not always to his
advantage. He proved to me, however, that he could take it on the chin and bore
right in for more.
In three months' time his interest in things athletic had become a passion. He came
to admire his physique. And then one day the best boxer in the shop challenged
him, he accepted, and gave the fellow one of the worst maulings he had ever had
in his life.
With this accomplishment he had that respect physical inferiority always pays to
physical superiority. And, having been a coward, his courage now was genuine, not
of the false bully type that finds sadistic pleasure in preying on weakness, but the
kind that defends weakness. He was later to organize the baseball team of our
shop, and still later to become the captain of the first team, and still later Emmett
Edwards became the director of all prison athletics, and was one of the first
contestants to enter a real prison prize ring, a Fourth of July feature created by his
efforts, while three thousand spectators looked on and rooted for their respective
favourite on whom they had laid their bets of tobacco and other items of prison
luxury.
From a craven coward and physical wreck, Emmett had climbed to the peak of
courage in one year's time. A mighty gap to span, but not a difficult one when love
and creative law worked hand in hand behind the gap-jumper to bring the feat
about.

It is sometimes claimed that creative progress is faster working on the down-grade


than it is on the up-grade. But the little experience I have had disproves this theory.

The example just recounted, for instance, shows beyond doubt that when the
creative principle is reversed from destruction to construction, the destructive
achievement that required years to attain was equaled if not surpassed in the
period of only one year, when its final measure had been attained in the opposite
direction.
And again in my own case, in a period of only a few months I was able to sublimate
habits that had taken twenty years to build into my life. Indeed, as I have also
pointed out, in cases of disease with a hysterical background of long standing, the
creative cure was brought about almost instantly once the cause for destructive
creation was isolated and the creative law set to work in the constructive direction
of health.
But after all, it is the arguing about definitions and theories that creates the
confusion so prevalent today, and that results in so much limitation on the part of
those who need the application of creative principle far more than they need the
learned expositions of what that principle is, how it works, and what it is calculated
to do. Actually and really, the only thing one needs to know about any law, or
principle, is that it exists, that it can be used for either good or bad, according to
the LOVE or desire motive of the individual, and that it always works, in the one
direction or the other. [The Royal Law states, LOVE thy Lord thy God, and the
second one is like unto it, LOVE thy neighbor as thy self.].
To waste valuable time quibbling about definitions and theories while all the time
need pleads for application, is, in my humble opinion, the summed-up total of all
that is unintelligent, unpractical, and certainly unproductive.
If a person suffering from illness went to a doctor and the doctor, instead of
applying medical treatment, defined the science of medicine, told how it worked,
and what it was calculated to achieve, such a patient would be no better off after
leaving the doctor than he was before seeing him.
Application is the final test of any law, and to make that application it is
not necessary to subject the law, an infallible principle, to the analysis of
a fallible human mind.

LOVE AND THE PRISON DOOR OF DEATH

CHAPTER VI

Dust, to its narrow house beneath!


Soul to its place on high!
They that have seen thy face in death,
No more may fear to die.
-Mrs. Henuans.

Does the continuity of the life-chain remain unbroken at death ? Whilst it


is instinctive and reasonable to believe in immortality, to many people,
belief without supporting proof is like faith that produces only the vague
realization of its evidence. Where realization is incomplete there is no
sense of certainty; and where there is no sense of certainty, satisfaction
is only partially experienced; and where satisfaction is only partially
experienced, troublesome doubts haunt the mind with annoying fears,
and thus a life that was created with inherent capacities of security
becomes insecure and miserable.
Most people fear death in one degree or another. They approach it, not inwardly
courageous, but with a sort of dull fatalistic emotion; their fear of it being made
hearable by the fact that it is inescapable and that every one must face it alike
sooner or later. This is one of the many curious graces of life, of compensation, that
dread loses much of its sting when shared by others.
But can immortality be proven to the intellect in the same manner in which a
scientist might prove the existence of a natural law ? Yes and no. A scientist
working with concrete facts before him may arrive at his law and prove it by the
facts assembled. For instance, Newton, observing the fall of an apple, began to
wonder why it didn't fall up instead of down. From the observation of this fact, he
began his investigations that later brought him to his law of gravitation. To prove
this law we have only to toss an object in the air and watch it being drawn back to
earth. With immortality, however, the procedure is somewhat different. The fact of
death occurs, but contemporary men who pass on fail to return in such a manner
as to make their testimony of the hereafter valid and acceptable.
With this problem one may experiment only with one's self. And while one may
prove to one's self intellectually that the life-chain remains unbroken at death, one
may not prove this truth to another, because the concrete evidence, the body, once
the life-force has been withdrawn from it, offers no proof of anything, save that
death has occurred. As the light-bulb refuses to reveal where the light goes when
the switch is pressed, so does the cold body refuse to reveal where the life-force
goes when the mortal heart has ceased to function.
Reason may give another convincing testimony of survival, but not tangible proof.
Take the monumental testimony of Sir Thomas Browne, for example. There is
nothing strictly immortal, said he, but immortality. Whatever hat no beginning may
be confident to have no end. That is sound reason based upon scientific deduction,
because even the most materialistic mind cannot conceive a beginning of life. And
certainly to presume an end for something that had no beginning is, at best, to
presume an impossibility. But while convincing reason may give courage by
strengthening faith, it can prove nothing to the intellect of another. It may remove
the greater part of death's sting; but it will not remove the gigantic question mark.
That must be accomplished in the laboratory of one's own mind.
There is a way to go about it. A scientific way. I am not the discover of this way by
any means. Eastern seers have been employing the method for centuries, perhaps.
I did, however, get an original realization of the method's existence some time
before I saw if formulated in specific detail. And while I may describe the method to
you, I can prove nothing to your intellect, unless you evoke enough interest to
apply the method, in which case you will inevitably arrive at you own proof, the
only possible way to arrive at proof on this most important question.

By this time it had been noised about the prison that since I had entered
the cell of Dad Trueblood I had learned from him the art of getting along
with almost everybody, no matter how disagreeable the person was with
others. I was not surprised, therefore, and neither was Dad, when one
day the warden sent for me and offered me a job in the prison hospital. I
found the doctor in the warden's office when I arrived there. The warden
asked me bluntly if I was afraid of death or contagion.
I was able to answer promptly and sincerely, No, I have no fear of the one
nor faith in the other.
He looked at me quizzically for a moment. Then he asked, Do you mean
you don't believe in death?
I believe there is a transition called death, I replied. In fact, I know there
is. But I have neither fear, faith, nor belief in death as a door that cannot
be opened with love and understanding before it is reached in the natural
way.
Have you proven this to your satisfaction? he asked.
Only upon the evidence of reason, warden. It is my hope to prove it by
experience some day without having to wait for the experience of death
itself.
Both the warden and the doctor had evidently pondered deeply on the
subject, but both had come to about the same conclusion. They saw in
death a scientific fact of life. Beyond that whatever speculations they had
entertained had dissipated into a sort of nebulous agnosticism.
I put the question to them both. Do you believe there is a power higher
than that expressed through the brain of man?
The doctor's ready answer surprised me, for it was sharply metaphysical
and strangely illuminating for a purely medical minded man. He said he
knew there was a power operating in the universe beside which man's
brain was comparatively nothing. But, he qualified, I believe there's a
latent capacity in the brain of man that, if it could be fully utilized, would
include all the power existent, both natural and supernatural.
You've expressed it better than I could, doctor, I told him. And then the warden told
me of a condition in the hospital I already knew about, since it was a common topic
throughout the prison.
In the tuberculosis ward was a patient known quite aptly as Poison Jasper. This man
was about to wind up a long and arduous career of crime. He was ending it,
however, true to his colors. Whatever else could be said of him, he determined to
die as he had lived, ferociously, consistent to the end.
For months he had been wasting away. As a patient he was the most ungovernable
in the ward. As a man his heart was as bitter and black as any heart could be. His
fellow patients feared him. He would laugh and sneer at his dying comrades who
sought solace in a last prayer or who called for the prison chaplain in their final
hour. He picked arguments with those round him. The doctor avoided the caustic in
his tongue whenever he could do so. And the warders were made constant objects
of his vile abuse. There was, of course, no way to discipline the man, since the
state law forbade the infliction of punishment on the sick and dying.
When he could not rail and rant at men, he cursed the God in whom he had never
believed. He was a fanatical disbeliever and was proud to declare it at any moment
the occasion might present itself. Nurse after nurse had been driven from the
hospital by his fiendish attacks upon them. Every one about him wished and longed
for the day of his demise, a fact which he knew all too well, and which he answered
with a tightening of his will to live on in spite of their wishes. One of his most
demonic traits would spring to the surface when some doing patient would send for
the chaplain and the latter, because of some one of many possible reasons, would
fail to comply. The reason, of course, would be conveyed to the patient.
But Poison Jasper would always scoff at such excuses, as he called them. The same
old alibi, he would cackle throatily, a preacher, a man of God, afraid to stick his
nose in this ward for fear he'll breathe one of our germs. He can tell all you human
skeletons how to die, all about heaven, what a swell joint it is. But he'd just as soon
stay right here. He's yellow. He's a rank coward.
These tirades were palpably unjust; yet he sincerely believed them to be true. He
detested any one who evinced fear of the disease that was gradually rubbing out
his own life.
Before I accepted the task, taming Poison Jasper, I talked to Dad Trueblood about it.

Well, it ain't that I want to lose a good cell-buddy, he said. But I don't aim
to meddle in your destiny. Every experience presented to us holds
something for us, if we'll only open our eyes and try to find it. Go on up
and do your best for them poor devils. You can't lose anything, and you
might gain a lot.
Old Dad Trueblood possessed an authentic sense of prophecy that I had learned by
this time to heed. I expressed doubt, however, as to my ability to handle the
situation.
Listen, Dad said thoughtfully, Old Jasper's just a poor misguided and
misunderstood child. Put love in your eye for him, and then make him
look at it. You'll probably be surprised at the result.
In the event I found it hard to evoke that love and he explained how I might
accomplish it. But first he quoted a passage from Young:
Men drop so fast, ere life's mid stage we tread,
Few know so many friends alive as dead.
Those who now hate Old Jasper most, he went on, will be unable to hold
that hate when they look upon his still features. In the presence of the
dead the faults of the past are dissolved and the virtues of the past are
resurrected. So just look at Old Jasper and imagine that the Almighty has
closed his weary lids and forgiven all the human errors and weaknesses.
In the presence of the dead the faults that once were are dissolved and
the virtues that were are resurrected. So just look at Old Jasper and
imagine he's no more. The love of which I spoke will well up in you and
your eyes will become its windows.
He also explained what I was later to learn in a most significant and
helpful way, that tubercular patients were acutely sensitive to the
opinions of others, expressed or unexpressed. That they could detect the
faintest tremor of fear on the part of the nurse, and this they resented,
because it weakened the hope they desired to retain to the end. If the
nurse was afraid of their disease, what hope had they of becoming cured?

Too, Dad added, some of the cases will have a purely imaginary basis. If
your actions are fearless and your hints to them convincing and
constructive, you might succeed in supplanting the sick thought in their
minds with a well thought strong enough to set their minds to building
new bodily tissue faster than the germs can destroy it. With this, hope
will likewise become stronger; faith will increase; the will to survive will
take on renewed persistence; bodily resistance will grow in proportion;
and as the power of resistance increases the destructive power of the
germs will decrease. T.B. germs don't thrive on resistance, but on a lack
of it.

When I walked into the ward the next night, I was immediately conscious of the
strained, fearful and suspicious atmosphere of the place. With me I had brought an
old copy of Vosney's Ruins of Empire. Dad had told me to give it to Jasper, and to
tell him casually that one of his old cronies had asked me to bring it in to him. I was
to mention also, that he must keep the book hidden when the keeper was around;
that it was a book on the chaplain's restriction list; and that if it was discovered
that I had brought it to him, I would be thrown into the dungeon for breaking this
rule.
Jasper mumbled something in a grudging tone about his not being the kind of a rat
who would knife a man who favored him. I had nothing to fear on that score. But he
was obviously suspicious of me as he had been of all the other nurses who had
preceded me. I could plainly see that he was determined not to show any signs of
friendliness toward me. But the book incident had disarmed him and he was
forced, unwillingly of course, at least to respect a man who would gamble with the
dungeon in order to do him, a total stranger, a good turn.
For several nights I was aware that Jasper watched me like an evil cat waiting for a
justifiable opportunity to pounce upon its prey. It was a game of wits I played with
him. I parried with all the skill I had at my command to forestall the opening he
sought. My second victory over him was scored on the night my first patient
passed on.
The dying man had begged for the chaplain to come over and administer last
minute prayers and spiritual consolation. But, unfortunately, the chaplain was away
from the prison at the time. Knowing what Jasper would have to say when this
disheartening news came back, I had prepared for the event. I had taken up a
position at the foot of Jasper's bed, and was standing there looking down at him
when the keeper came with the message-- I was looking down at him and
reasoning in my heart that I stood before a potential Christ. In fact, I
knew I was standing before a potential Christ. The only difference was
that Christ had used the medium of love to create a useful life, while
Jasper had used it to create a misspent life. Plainly, under such
circumstances of reasoning, Jasper, not being so fortunate as Christ,
deserved sympathy instead of censure, love instead of hate. This feeling
consumed me as I stood there. Just as the keeper informed the dying
patient that the chaplain was away at the time, Jasper looked me
squarely in the eye, opened his mouth to unlimber a bitter epithet, then
turned his eyes from mine without speaking.
I've never said many prayers, I told him in a confidential tone, but I've a notion to
try it for that poor guy. If doing that much will make things seem a little easier for
him, I believe I'd feel pretty much like a cad not to do it. What do you think, Jasper?

He made no comment. But he studied me intently as I lifted the patient in my arms


and asked him to follow my words in his mind. The man died in this position,
apparently comforted by the awkward but sincere prayer of a layman. His head
had dropped against my shoulder, somewhat in the manner of a tired babe falling
to sleep.
It was this test of my disregard for the disease that convinced Jasper I had no fear
of it. It also convinced all my other patients, and because of this incident the
morale of the patients was lifted to a marked degree.
From that moment on until Jasper's hour to go had arrived, there was no more
trouble with him during my time on duty. In the day-time, however, he made no
such voluntary concessions as he had reluctantly conceded to me.

Jasper died about two o'clock one morning. He died without any apparent fear or
pain. His mind was active and he was able to whisper right up to the last minute.
Yet he had asked for no spiritual consolation, and he indicated no complaint.
Ten minutes before the end came his body began to relax. The hard brutal
lines on his wasted face softened, and the eyes that had burned so
feverishly and fiercely in their sunken black sockets, became softly
brilliant, like a pair of luminous twin stars. Standing directly in front of
him, I seemed unable to hold his gaze. While his eyes were fastened
directly on me, they appeared to be fastened on something through and
far beyond me. He beckoned feebly and I sat down on the edge of his bed.

I'm dying, he whispered.


Of course I knew he spoke the truth, but I awkwardly sought to reassure him.
Don't be a fool, he murmured. I see it all there as plain as day.
Where? What? I asked, leaning eagerly toward his lips for the answer.
I tell you I'm dying, he repeated, ignoring my query. I tell you I can see-----. His
eyes rolled upward and the lids partly closed over them.
This incident I put down as a deathbed visual hallucination, and allowed it to pass
quickly from my thoughts. Then several days later, during my sleep period, I was
awakened out of a dream that had to do with this patient. It seemed that
I had failed in my effort to draw the lids over his eyes. I dozed off again
and immediately I began dreaming of the garden and the Christ Who
walked there.'This time the words were first in my mind when again I had
awakened. One phrase was, Lift up thine eyes to Heaven, and the other,
Let thine eye be single.
The dream itself seemed to have no special significance; nor was it unusual.
Doubtless many persons have had similar dreams. It was the channel of thought it
opened up that stirred me so profoundly. An observation I had made numerous
times before became sharply provocative.
Why was it, I thought, that during the transition from life to death the eyeballs
turned upward instead of downward?
I began to probe into the question in search of a reasonable answer. Certainly the
action was contrary to nature. The well-trained muscles that controlled the
movement of the eyeballs were adjusted to only two natural positions, the level
position, and the downward position. Rolling the eyeballs up was neither natural
nor an easy feat to accomplish even by force. It seemed quite singular, therefore,
that in death the eyeballs would ignore natural custom and roll up instead of down,
thus making an exception to a life-long rule of following the habit of least
resistance. That death brought muscular relaxation failed, as it seemed to me, to
account for the phenomenon.
Later, as I continued to ponder the matter, I came into possession of a fugitive
piece of reading material. And this in itself was strange, although such relative
things do seem to have a peculiar way, often a most curious way, of finding those
in search of that particular type of information sought.
In this paper the author told how when the eyes were down as in ordinary sleep,
we drifted through dream states evolved from the subconscious reservoir of
memory. When the eyes were level, as in our waking hours, we were living in the
conscious state of being. When the eyeballs were lifted upward in meditation, we
entered into the metaphysical realm. The paper, also, gave a detailed system for
practice which I promptly began to follow.
My practice was carried on in a darkened room while I lay flat on my back without
pillows. It took me many days so to train the unaccustomed muscles that
controlled the movement of the eyeballs before I could make them respond to my
wishes easily and free of strain, that is, before I could lift my eyeballs and hold
them in that position without their tiring or becoming fluttery.
When I had accomplished this a most surprising thing happened. I sat
down one night to snatch a brief period of meditation. Closing my eyes, I
began to think about the many things that had come to me of late for
which to feel grateful. As I continued to enumerate them silently, I felt an
irresistible tugging sensation in my eyes, and presently, without
conscious effort on my part, I was aware that my eyeballs were being
drawn upward toward a single focal point in the center of my forehead.
On this point they became riveted. As they did so, the effect was that of
turning on an electric switch. The entire front part of my head became
illuminated with brilliant multicolored light. In comparison the light of the
sun was as a white beam beside a radium dial; a candle beside a
lighthouse beacon.
To me the discovery was a sublime revelation. I became immersed in the
boundless luminosity of it. The consciousness of self vanished in it. I no
longer appeared as an individualized speck in the universal scheme of
things. I was the universe itself, with all its limitless freedom, its endless
expansion, its blissful enchantment. A mighty symphony of celestial
music seemed to vibrate through my uncurbed being. I saw and heard
what Poison Jasper saw and heard when he told me not to be a fool, that
he saw it all as plain as day. I saw more, I saw my own body, inert,
motionless, apparently lifeless, and I had compassion on those who were
compelled to live in such cramped quarters as the body I had inhabited,
and now looked upon from a perspective vantage point of limitless
freedom and joy.
By and by the luminosity began to gather into a unity of one color, a
mauve purple, and out of this there presently appeared at the spot where
my eyes were riveted, a perfectly pointed star. It presented the illusion of
vast distance, although though it appeared quite near. When I opened my
eyes, the warder was shaking my arm and informing me that a patient
was in need of attention. He thought I had fallen asleep. But I hadn't. I
had never been so much awake. In that brief moment I had proven to my
intellect that I possessed an immortal soul. In that short period of time, I
received the secret in the Master's words uttered to me in a dream. I
knew what He meant when He said Lift up thine eyes to Heaven. I knew in
that star between my eyes I had found the eye that is forever single.
I've died twice daily and once nightly since that first discovery. Three times during
the twenty-four hours I induce the little death in exchange for a few moments of
the boundless life.
As I plainly stated at the beginning of this chapter, immortality can be
proven to the intellect in a scientific way and by a scientific method. But I
cannot, nor can any one else, prove it to the intellect of another. I say
again, it is not my desire to prove, but to describe. To those of you,
however, who have feared death, and who have doubted the unbroken
continuity of life, I can assure you that a little effort will give to you the
proof that it gave to me; and perhaps at a much less expenditure of effort
for I, like Poison Jasper, can hardly be considered a person with unusual
psychic development. I'm not. I've lived a hard doubting, skeptical life.
Even now I come from metaphysical meditations doubting many of the
very things I've realized there. Had I been more sensitive to the cosmic
influences than I am, my spiritual conflict would have been over with the
discovery just recounted. But the human animal is still very much alive in
me, and I have still many arresting habits that must be sublimated before
the smoke of Armageddon's war ceases to roll in blotting clouds across
my mind.
But if you need more than the evidence of faith, if you are one of those
persons who are compelled by nature to find our way by reason and
experiment, as I am; if you need intellectual proof, if you must realize
immortality through actual experience here and now, if you really care to
contact the fourth dimension by a conscious method and explore for
yourself the vast realm of superconsciousness-- I repeat, if you are
sincerely interested, enough so to make the little effort necessary, then
you need search no farther for the means to that end. It is in your hands.
You have only to use it. No information is worth an iota to the person who
merely receives it and does not apply it.

This chapter has been read in manuscript by several persons of varying faiths and
schools of thought, including one occultist and an orthodox minister. By the latter I
was informed that no one should dare to experiment in this manner, that one
should not deliberately meddle in destiny.
Not in another person's destiny, perhaps, but in your own destiny-- by all means.
The occultist informed me in the most vibrant tones that I had stumbled upon a
secret that had been known to Eastern seers for centuries. I didn't stumble upon it.
It was attracted to me when I was ready to use it. One of the very seers he
mentioned authored the paper that came into my hands and gave me the method I
later used successfully. The same seer is today busy trying to give the method to
others.
Another bit of information my occultist critic gave me was, You should guard this
wisdom lest it fall into the hands of others-- others who in their ignorance or
avarice might misuse it.
Now of course I'm no seer nor adept. I've lived no life of renunciation or strict
austerity. I've just blundered along through life like fate, taking the hard knocks
that invariably accompany unintelligent living, and finally after a long time awaking
up to the fact that there was such a thing as plain mule sense in the world for any
one who wanted to use it.
This mule sense tells me, despite the warning of my occult friend, that neither
knowledge nor wisdom can be misused. To have wisdom is to have a realization of
truth, and to have a realization, a consciousness of truth, is to be uplifted by it. In
my humble opinion, the capacity to receive truth is God's guarantee
against its misuse; and surely any guarantee of God's is man's
opportunity to rise, not sink.
I was reminded, likewise, that one should knock at the door of higher
levels of understanding inspired only by the highest motives, thus
revealing to me that he had never remotely approached true
superconscious being. The methods employed to open this door are of no
importance whatever, save as a means to an end. The motive may be the
worst form of selfishness, an idle sense of curiosity. The important thing
is to open the door. Once opened, and during the stay therein, human
motives vanish, all low human qualities and characteristics become
wholly and completely dissolved in the illimitable sea of all-pervading
truth.
Immersed in this sea all meditation becomes impersonal; the finite aspect
of love falls away as universal love closes in around you. You think
without being conscious of thinking, you feel without being conscious of
feeling, you receive all without appearing to receive. Always you come
out of these meditations a better spiritual entity than when you entered.
And since the ultimate purpose of life is to grow spiritually, I disagree
with those who would tell you not to meddle in your own destiny and not
approach the door that leads to life eternal.

LOVE AND THE PRISON DOOR OF DISEASE

CHAPTER VII

All bodily disease which we look upon as whole


and entire within itself, may after all, be but a
symptom of some ailment in the spiritual past.
-Hawthorne.

If this chapter might later appear to have been misnamed, I can assure
the reader that such is not the case. Love operating through me made it
possible to break down natural human restraints, obtain confidence in
the cases described, and thus get to the real causes that were
responsible for the diseases manifest.
My experiences in the prison hospital included many of such cases. Most of them I
was able to cure without the use of drugs. Some I failed to cure, because the
conditioning habit of morbidity had become so deeply rooted in the subconscious
life of the patient that my inventive resources failed to uncover an effective means
of treatment.
Before I get farther into the chapter, I wish to make it understood now that in
neither of the first two cases mentioned here was there an organic basis for the
diseases treated. In each case the underlying cause was mental. During this time
and since, I've treated and cured scores of sick and crippled people of every
conceivable kind and degree of affliction. And in every case where I was able to
effect a cure the manifestation of affliction was hysterical and not organic. I have
never been able to effect a cure in purely organic cases. I do not, however, wish to
infer that such cures cannot be accomplished by others; but that they haven't been
accomplished by me, and certainly in making this statement a great mistake would
be made by any one accepting it as a general rule rather than a particular one. l
can and do, nevertheless, offer it as my belief that at least half of the sickness in
America, especially, is due to unwholesome mental habits, such as destructive
suggestibility. The following case will illustrate clearly what 1 mean.
The man in question was highly intelligent, very sensitive, and extremely cocksure
about his own opinions.
He was carried into the hospital late one night suffering from extreme pain in the
abdomen. He said to me as I helped him remove his clothing, I know what's the
matter with me. But don't say anything. I want to see if the doctor knows.
When the doctor reached him and made his examination, he diagnosed the pain as
gall colic. You're absolutely right, doctor, the patient said, I'm lousy with gall-
stones. He manifested every possible symptom of this disease.
Since the case seemed to call for an immediate operation, the surgeon was called
from his bed. He reached the prison hospital in no pleasant frame of mind. He
examined the patient carefully, and later announced that the fellow was suffering
from the effects of an exaggerated imagination; that what he needed was a
metaphysical practitioner instead of a surgeon.
Still, he added, if you can't find any other way to reach him, we may have to
operate as a gesture in order to save his life. If he gets any worse by morning give
me a ring.
See what you can do, the hospital physician said to me, and I started on the trail of
the mental quirk that had brought the fellow's trouble about.
In the first place the man was suffering severe pain, and to this I responded with a
whole-hearted sympathy. I made an effort to do what I could, in a physical way, for
him, while at the same time I was planning how best I might approach him in my
effort to help him in a mental way.
By careful and tactful leads I succeeded in getting him to talk about himself and his
opinions between grunts and groans. I assumed the role of a poorly informed but
sympathetic listener, eager to profit by the sage advice I well knew he was capable
of giving me. Thus he revealed in due time that he had been an inveterate reader
of newspaper health articles.
He was that type of susceptible person to whom health information was quite as
likely as not to prove a liability instead of an asset. Indeed to one of these articles
he had unwittingly fallen prey. The article had been written by a famous doctor on
the subject of gall-stones.
At the time he read the article there was a slight but annoying muscular pain in the
abdominal region where gall-colic occurs. The pain appeared to him to be identical
with that described by the writer. So he promptly grew alarmed and began to
diagnose his own case, which was of course gall-stones. And by the time he
reached the hospital all the symptoms of this disease were rejected in his physical
organism.
Now that I had the cause, it became a complicated problem as to how I might
eradicate it. Obviously I could not do it by the use of reason or suggestion. My
making myself a pupil of his, as it were, I had destroyed the opportunity to make a
sudden right-about face and become his teacher. Besides, he was entirely too
opinionated to be convinced against his will. There was nothing to do, therefore,
but let him cure himself, while I did the directing, although I appeared not to be
doing so.
As I pondered on a method, a brilliant idea occurred to me. In my room was a book
written by a doctor who advocated fasting in the cure and prevention of disease.
Later in the morning, I paused at his door to inquire after him, and I had the book
in my hand. He asked me the title of it. I told him, and mentioned casually that I
had just been reading the chapter on gall-stones. As I expected he asked to see it. I
gave him the book, and went on about my duties. when again I had returned his
eyes were burning with enthusiasm.
Here's a doctor that knows his business, he said. If I could get the treatment
prescribed here I could cure myself.
Well, I replied, they don't allow any unorthodox treatment here in the hospital. But
I'm willing to trust you and take a chance. This statement pleased him. You tell me
what to do, I added, and I'll follow instructions.
Thus it was, I took four ounces of olive oil and four ounces of orange juice, whipped
them together, and gave it to him at six that morning. During the day he refused
food. At seven that night, when I came on duty again, he instructed me to give him
a high warm enema, which I did. As I well knew it would, this brought away a great
quantity of hard green pellets of bile. We secured seventy-seven of these small
pellets in all. Immediately following this demonstration, every symptom of gall-
stone left the man. He remained in the hospital, however, for six more days fasting
on orange juice according to the advice given in the book. Then he pronounced
himself cured and returned to his cell. Until I left the prison this fellow carried a
dozen or so of these bile pellets around in a match box and never passed up an
opportunity to display them to any one who was curious to know just what a gall-
stone really looked like.
In this instance I might also add, that the case described above was only one of
several encountered during my hospital experience whose causes were traced
back to the reading of health articles, medical books, patent medicine circulars and
the like.
Several years ago the press conducted a vigorous educational campaign against
cancer. As a direct result of reading these informational articles and editorials, two
prisoners developed typical symptoms of stomach cancer, one of which died a
lingering painful death, and the other I treated and cured by convincing him I
possessed curative powers in my hands, which I placed over the affected regions
and advised him to feel the flow of curative magnetism pouring from my hands to
the cancerous growth. His own belief, or if you'd rather, his own faith in the
mastery of my apparent power, did the work by replacing in his mind a well
thought instead of the sick one he had been entertaining.

Before taking up case number two I wish to take issue with many people who
deplore the use of deception in any form or for any reason. In nearly all mental
treatments, deceptions, ruses of some kind, must be resorted to in order
to get the cause of the trouble and apply an effective counter-actant. The
creative principle does not recognize the right or wrong of anything. But
the use that man makes of a thing determines its moral quality. Any vice
may be turned into a virtue by reversing its trend and setting it in motion
toward the ends of virtue.
Case number two was undoubtedly the most amazing example I've ever seen or
heard about in the realm of hysterically induced physical disabilities. He was an
absolute wreck. He was brought from the court room to the prison on a stretcher to
begin an indeterminate sentence. It had been predicted at the time that he would
cheat the law of its prey long before the board of paroles had a chance to act on
his case.
His hospital chart revealed him a sufferer of paralysis of limbs, hardening of the
liver, diabetes, dropsy tendencies, arthritis, tuberculosis of the bowels, heart-
leakage, neuroticism, faulty-vision and high blood pressure.
So the reader might, also, share the assumption of the time that this man was in a
dying condition. Because of its relative importance, I wish to add one item that was
not listed on the chart. The fellow was an illiterate and was childishly superstitious,
as I soon discovered.
At the time he committed the crime, a shooting affair, for which he had been
convicted, he had been in apparent good health.
It took me several nights to break through the wall sf secrecy he had built up
around himself. Suspicious and slow to trust, he was chary of strangers; he was on
guard against anything that seemed like an approach to his inner life. I didn't press
him, but I did evoke a strong feeling of love for him, and I missed no opportunity to
express that love in tangible terms that he could not only feel but understand. Inch
by inch the bars went down. Then one night he made a confession with all the
naivete of a child.
In the neighborhood where he had lived all his life was an old woman who
possessed strange powers of divination. She had visited him at the jail and
revealed to him that he was in the clutches of the evil one. A curse had been
placed on him and a spell cast that would destroy him in a terrible way. The hands
that held the gun would turn to stone, the eyes that sighted down the gun barrel
would become blind, his legs would become useless, his innards like a nest of
poison serpents.
Accepting this upon the infallible authority of the old woman, he promptly set his
mind to the task of reflecting it all in his body. Obviously, there was but one thing
to be done in his case and that was to destroy the influence of the evil one, the evil
one of his own mind. As in nearly all such cases it was a matter of fighting the
devil, or his imaginations, with his own weapons. Logic, reason, persuasion were
puny implements compared to the implements of that devil in his determination to
make the sinister curse effective. Deception had brought the man's condition
about; deception would have to be resorted to in order to counteract the results of
the original deception. Between two evils there is but one choice for the
practitioner, the evil that can be twisted and set to work along constructive lines.
I took the doctor into my plans and obtained his permission to allow Dad Trueblood
to co-operate with me. Then Dad and I worked out our campaign of attack. Since I
had access to the patient's private history, and since it was I who read all his
letters for him, I had in my possession a great quantity of personal information
about the man, which I turned over to Dad.
Then I began to tell the patient about an old man in this very prison who had
powers even greater than those possessed by the old woman he had told me
about. This old man, I told him, could even tell your fortune. I could see
immediately that he was interested. After awhile I suggested that he ask the doctor
if he might be permitted to see the fortune-teller, and of course the doctor agreed,
and sent for Dad to come over.
What a revelation it was! The patient told me afterward: Why, he told me things no
one on earth knows about but me. Time and again Dad was sent for by the patient,
and with each visit the patient's faith in Dad's powers mounted higher and higher
until I was able to tell Dad one day, Well, old-timer, you've won the most exalted
prize in this world, you've become a god.
That's good, the old fellow said, but there's much to be done. I must get absolute
control of the poor devil. He's got to see me demonstrate my power over man's
strongest enemy.
You mean--- ? I asked.
Yep, he said, he's got to see me raise the dead.
We carefully arranged for this great demonstration to take place in the room
directly across the hall from the patient's room.
In this room we planted an accomplice earlier in the evening, a man presumably
brought over from one of the cell-houses in a dying condition. For two or three
hours there was much activity around his room, hurried darting about between
many whispered consultations. The reason for all of this I conveyed in a most
solemn and confidential manner to my patient across the hall who, of course, had
been taking it all in. Finally, at the hour of midnight the accomplice died and I
carried the tragic news over to our interested spectator.
Listen to me, I said to him, you stand in good with the doctor. I want you to ask him
to let Dad Trueblood come over here and see what he can do. The man is dead, I
know; but I believe Dad can bring him back to life.
Do you reckon Dad could do that?
I did. The patient told me to tell the doctor he would like to speak with him. A few
minutes later the doctor emerged from the patient's room and winked. And in a
few more minutes the miracle man, Dad Trueblood, was in the hospital. He didn't
go directly into the death room; but he went first into the patient's room. Very
solemnly he thanked the patient for interceding on the dead man's behalf.
Do you think you can really bring him back to life? the patient asked eagerly.
I don't think anything about it, was Dad's reply. I know I can. He's not dead, but
sleeping. The evil one has cast a spell over him and a curse on him. I am greater
than the evil one. Before my words the evil one flies back to the darkness where he
came from. I am the evil ones's master. Before me he cannot stand. Watch!
And the patient did watch. He watched every gesture and heard each word that fell
from Dad's lips. He saw the dead man raise up in his bed with the motion of Dad's
hand. He saw Dad back slowly toward the door and heard him say Come to the
man who a minute before had lain cold under the evil one's spell. And he saw the
man follow Dad into the hall and disappear down the corridor, never agin to return
to the bed of death.
And on a night a week later, the miracle man performed the same sort of
ceremony in the room of out patient. He broke the evil one's spell, and
that moment the hysterically produced diseases that had held the man in
their grip for months fell away as though they had never been.
I once recounted this incident to a practicing metaphysician, a woman who had an
excellent record of accomplishments to her credit. The end attained, she thought,
was a worthy one; but to her the method employed was extremely revolting and
sacrilegious. Had we employed the deceptions of our own invention instead of
closely copying the methods of Jesus by which to perpetuate our deceptions, her
criticism would have been withheld.
In my opinion, however, there is no valid parallel between our method and that of
the Master. It is assumed that He was above the need of employing deceptive
methods to accomplish His ends, and since we possessed no such development as
this, we could not copy what we did not possess. I have no fear but that the Master,
recognizing our limitations, would have readily condoned our means.

There is a vast difference in the attitude of a patient entering a prison hospital and
one entering a hospital on outside. Such hospitals no longer hold the terror for the
sick they once did, but the belief still persists among most prisoners that in the
prison hospital there, is a mysterious black bottle always at hand for midnight
service. One dose from this bottle and there is one less convict to provide trouble
for the law.
Of all the fears that harass men in prison, the worst is the fear of dying in prison.
Why this should be I do not know. But there may be a touch of superstition
connected with it. To a prisoner his prison represents a living hell on earth,
and it might be that deep down within him he fears to die in this hell of
sin and iniquity, because to do so might lessen his chances of escaping
that other hell lying just across the border. Ninety-nine out of every
hundred prisoners possess a psychopathic religious streak in them that
comes to the surface in the form of fear when they become seriously ill.
If I could only live long enough to get out, is the plaintive cry one hears in
the prison hospitals. And it's a soul-rending cry, because of the utter
hopelessness of it in most cases. It appears that in their minds is a belief
that death on the outside is something of a pleasure, whilst on the inside
it is something to be viewed with dread and trembling.
I stress this point here for the purpose of showing that the very
desperation involved, sometimes proves the factor most needed in
effecting an ultimate cure, especially in cases where the causes are
organic and the affliction genuine. [Editor's note: The religious doctrine of hell,
or eternal damnation, becomes man's inhumanity to man. God's grace far exceeds
our limitation and this is seen in where sin abounded, GRACE did much more
abound. We must not sweep away the revelation presented to us in II Corinthians
5:18, God was in Christ personally reconciling the world (all mankind) to Himself.All
human history is consummated in Christ].
The following was such a case. In it there was no mental cause to be probed for
and eradicated, and yet everything depended upon establishing in the patient's
mind a strong personal desire to overcome. In this instance, therefore, my duty
was to discover some method whereby this desire could be planted and fostered in
the patient's mind. Consequently the resulting progress was not one of those
sudden healings that occur in the lives of the hysterically afflicted; but it was a
dogged, slow-moving, determined process of mind over matter, of will over the
fatalistic tendency to accept a physical condition as being hopeless.
The patient was a young man of fine physique, who had always been proud of his
bodily development, his masculinity, and his ability to fend for himself and for his
young wife and two children. In his mind, to be crippled or deformed in any way
represented the tragedy of tragedies.
He had been curried into the hospital one day from the rock quarry with both arms
broken, each one in two separate places. The unusual method employed in setting
bones proved inadequate in his case and surgery was resorted to in the end.
The bones knitted splendidly, but there was the faintest overlapping of nerve lines,
which left the boy's arms from the elbows down log-like and lifeless. Apparently
nothing could be done about it; but the surgeon dropped a hint that if the
unfortunate could be made to concentrate the full force of his will on the
problem and keep trying to move the dead fingers, he might eventually
succeed in bringing about a realignment of the nerve carriers and thus
regain the use of his arms.
The patient, however, had been completely overcome by the tragedy. All the
interest he had ever had in life seemed to have left him when the full truth of his
condition was finally forced upon him. Almost daily some of his relatives visited
him. At first he could hardly bear the thought of seeing his wife and children.
Unfortunately, through their strong efforts to pacify him, they succeeded in
establishing in his mind a sort of dull acceptance, and he began to reconcile
himself to a future of invalidism. Of course, so long as he remained in this attitude
of mind, there was no use trying to reason with him about the necessity of making
an effort. Every one about him did that to no avail. He would pretend to try, tire
quickly, and slump back in his pillows.
While I watched these futile attempts being made to arouse an interest in him, I
came to the conclusion that his case was to be absent of pandering sympathy. This
fellow had to be handled with brutal frankness and infinite patience, and infinite
encouragement. To that task I dedicated myself.
I pictured to him with all the powers of description I could command, the horrors of
an armless future, of his being a life-long object of charity, depending on others for
every crust he ate, for every rag he wore. He was forced to grit his teeth to keep
from screaming while I savagely mapped out the course his life must take. In the
face of it he did exactly what I wanted him to do, he became desperate, he had
been stirred to the foundation of his soul. At this juncture I said: Remember,
kid, it's up to you. If you want this sort of future you can have it. If you
don't want it, you don't have to take it.
My last sentence kindled fires of hope in his eyes. He could not wait to begin the
battle. I patted his shoulder in appreciation of his courage. I'll explain how to go
about it, I told him then.
And with this I told him about the creative principle that operated
throughout the universe that could be contacted by love; that if his love
for his arms was strong enough to make him try ceaselessly to move his
fingers, the creative principle could be made to do his bidding.
His efforts were pathetically heroic. In order to make it less difficult, I advised him
to direct his will into the right hand first. For three weeks I spent every spare
minute I had at his bedside giving him encouragement. Sometimes he would think
he felt his fingers move. And I would say, You're right, they did move just a tremor.
These lies were creative lies, because they created in him greater determination
and greater effort.
As I watched one night my long vigil was rewarded. His thumb moved. I grabbed
him around the neck and shouted. I staggered from the room blind with gratitude.
I was never to have the satisfaction of seeing much further progress than that
made, however, for about this time his relatives succeeded in getting him paroled
because of the injury he had received while in prison. He was the only man to
whom I've ever begrudged freedom. I believed then and I still believe that had I
been given another month with him, his arms would have been restored. But
during my remaining period in prison I heard of him from time to time. They had
him in the care of many doctors who had tried in vain to help him. He had
promised me on the day he left that he would keep trying our method. But many
over-indulgent hands, I'm afraid, eager to do the work that his were made to do,
broke down the desperate desire I had built up in him. At any rate, the last word I
had of him proved him to be no better off than he was on the day he left prison.

Always love causes something to be created. But always love must direct
the creative principle toward constructive ends if such are the ends
desired. I do not say this boy's friends and relatives consciously sought
destruction for him. Indeed they did not. But the love they had for him
was not the wise love that gives others the necessary stimulus and
encouragement to help themselves.
The mother who loves her child so much that she relieves her child of self
developing effort, is not loving constructively, and because she is not
loving constructively a price will later be exacted of both her and the
child. For always the creative principle creates that which it is directed to
create This is its nature. And this is what it does. It is man's duty to use
the creative principle toward constructive ends to the fullest extent of his
capacity to do so. And this capacity is sometimes greater than man might
at first realize. In other words, one never knows what one can do until
one tries.
If every man would pause to question the course his desires were taking,
and change that course if he found it to be destructive, this old world
would soon notice a mighty falling off on the debit side of misery.
In this last particular I have saved a most unusual case through which to show how
the creative principle, reversed, brought happiness to a man who for years had
rolled himself about in a wheel-chair, grumbling at his fate, bored with the terrible
monotony of his existence.
His physical handicap was of small importance compared to the sullen, brooding
melancholia that made the contemplation of life far more terrible than
contemplation of death. He had to be watched constantly in order to prevent him
from carrying out and achieving what he had attempted on two or three occasions.
A sufferer from insomnia, he would lie through the endless nights wide-eyed,
cursing and grumbling; with the coming of morning he faced the day with the
deadening horror of exhaustion, each moment passing with the slow pace of a
century. All day long he would roll himself back and forth from his room to the
clock at the far end of the corridor, note the time and then curse the hands that
moved so slowly round the dial.
Being irritable and constantly cranky, he had no friends. In fact, he was one man
who seemed unwilling to share his misery with others. To speak to him in a friendly
tone was to court immediate rebuke, and only those unfamiliar with his scathing
tongue ever invited it.
He had been a patient in the hospital for nearly a year when I began my duties
there. I was promptly warned against him, told that no one would have anything to
do with him. But this well-intentioned advice, instead of prejudicing me against the
man, awakened within me a compassion so great that I found it difficult to contain
it. I wanted to pour it out on him in a torrential flow of words. However, I held
myself in check, bided my time, studied him minutely, and watched for him to show
some sign of responsiveness. My reward came one day when I saw him watching
the antics of a stray dog that had somehow slipped by the guard and found its way
in to the prison yard. This display of interest struck me that he might be interested
in a pet. I revealed my finding to the warden and got his permission to allow the
man to have a small pet in his room.
I first thought of trying to secure a white mouse; but before I had a chance to make
arrangements for one, a friend of mine found a young sparrow on the flag-stones of
one of the cell buildings. The little fellow's right wing was broken. I brought it into
the hospital and began to set the broken member. As I worked the patient rolled up
in his chair and sat watching me silently. I turned to him and said, I think I ought to
wire the bones, And then I asked him to hold the bird while I went for the silver
wire.
In a few minutes we were working together over our little cockney friend. With the
operation completed, I hinted that I hated to turn the bird loose till it was well, but I
didn't have time to look after it.
I'll take care of it for you, he volunteered.
And how he took care of it! No bird ever got the love and attention that he lavished
on Molly, as he later named her. She thrived on his care. Her wing knitted and grew
strong. He taught her many little tricks. She would ride about perched on his head;
she would cling to his ear and chatter, while he chattered back. She would cling to
his finger and take food from his tongue.
Then one day he grew pensive and told me he had decided to give Molly her
freedom. I'll never forget that day. I went with him to the window and pushed the
screen back for him. When Molly flew out, all that life held for him seemed to go
with her. We watched her as she flew chattering here and there, lighting on this
building and that, until finally we lost her and turned from the window. She
remained away all day. But late in the afternoon I was awakened by his shout at
my door. Jumping up I ran into his room. And there was Molly clinging to the
outside of the screen, fussing and fluttering her wings in the utmost impatience
with our stupidity and slowness in coming to her rescue.
Every day after that Molly was allowed to go out; but always about the same time
in the afternoon she would reappear to be let in again. When the clock told him it
was time to expect Molly home, he would roll himself to the window to welcome
her.
Out of this incident I was able to establish other interests in this patient. He
became an expert with needle and thread and made many beautiful things which
he sold to visitors. A part of this money he set aside for charity purpose which he
conducted among the hospital patients. Little things they needed that were not
furnished by the prison he would buy and distribute. His name became a symbol of
kindness throughout the prison. They called him a square guy, the highest
compliment one convict can pay to another. And those he befriended during their
stay in the hospital seldom forgot. Though he had no friends or relatives outside,
on holidays, when boxes were allowed to be sent in, he was the recipient of more
gifts than any one else in the prison. All of these gifts would come from his inmate
friends; men fortunate enough to have friends and relatives outside to remember
them.
The money he didn't use for charity was hoarded carefully until he had enough
saved to purchase a set of books on commercial drafting. With these books he was
busy preparing himself for a useful future when I was released. So completely
occupied was he with this and his numerous other activities, he found it necessary
to budget his time, allowing so much for this thing and so much for that. He has
been given permission to use a bed lamp after the regular hour for retiring, and in
this way he could carry on until midnight, at which time he would go to bed. Having
trained himself to induce instant sleep, he would rest perfectly for six hours, at the
end of which another busy day would begin.
How different his life was from those other days of dragging torment and
those endless nights of sleeplessness. Then, each minute in the twenty-
four hours meant just a link in an endless chain of monotony; now, each
minute was a gem, too precious to be wasted in destructive thought and
idleness.
It was a miracle in the realm of transformation; but it was an inevitable
miracle. It could have been no other way. The moment he began to use
the creative principle of life in the right direction, that moment he began
to displace misery with happiness. This man confided many jewels of
wisdom to me before my departure, but I've always held the following to
be his richest bit of prison philosophy.
Don't seek peace, he told me, but conflict. By conflict we grow, and
growth is just another name for happiness.

LOVE CAN OPEN PRISON DOORS OF STEEL

CHAPTER VIII

Great men are they who see that spiritual is stronger


than any material force, that thoughts rule the world.
-Emerson.

All men accept the idea that love and thought are synonymous, that the
former is the first expression of the latter, and that the combination of
the intellectual and emotional form a unity inseparable one from the
other, and that this unity, acting upon creative principle, constitutes the
strongest creative force in the world.
All men admit that thought-force is capable of performing miracles, of
constantly changing the face of things, of brushing aside the impossible,
and out of the impossible of yesterday establishing the commonplace of
today. Men will agree to the truism that the possible accomplishments of
thought are limitless; but when you say that thought can open the doors
of a modern prison, unsupported by collusion or political influence, men
will shake their heads, thus indicating their Missourian disposition to be
shown.
On an evening in 1924 I sat in a cell alone on the receiving gallery of the prison
mentioned throughout this book. My outlook was as black and hopeless as any
man's outlook could possibly be. That morning I had been up before the board of
paroles, and the chairman of the board, who had done the talking, had been in no
mood to spare my sensibilities.
Only a very short while before I faced the same body of men, and I had made them
the usual run of glowing promises. Yes, gentlemen, I had said on that occasion,
when I go out this time I intend to make good. I've learned my lesson. This jolt has
taught me that crime doesn't pay. I'm done with it forever. Me for the straight and
narrow from now on.
Well, this has been your second offence in this prison, the chairman had replied.
Yet your prison record has been fairly good. We've decided to give you another
chance. But if you fail, if you come back again you may expect no consideration at
our hands.
And I had gone out a few mornings later. The man who signed my parole and who
had worked for my release because of his friendship for my father, received me in
a spirit of paternal trust and confidence. And that very night I took up again where I
had left off when the prison door had cut short my criminal career. I had no
intention of trying to make good. I had merely repeated my old meaningless
promises in exchange for official favors. So when I sat before the parole board on
this morning I wore the brand of an habitual criminal. The chairman said to me:
You've betrayed the trust we reposed in you. You were told what to expect if you
did that. Now what have you to say for yourself ?
I had nothing to say, of course. what could I say? I had reached the end of my
purring promises. I was at the end of my old reliable resources. I could say nothing
but face the music and pay the fiddler.
You've made your own bed, the chairman went on ruthlessly, and you've made it
out of sand-burrs. It's going to be pretty tough to lie in. But you're going to lie in it
this time. Your sentence calls for from one to twenty years. I wish we had power to
make it life. You've forfeited every right to our sympathy. We cannot inflict more
than the maximum sentence upon you, but we can inflict that, and you shall be
made to serve every minute of that twenty years, which will amount to eleven
years and three months under the 'good time law,' without ever again having an
opportunity to appear before this board for consideration of parole matters.
My rating was not only that of an habitual criminal. My criminological rating had me
listed as abnormal, criminally insane, incurably anti-social. I was hopelessly beyond
the influence of reformation. The warden told me no power on earth save a miracle
could ever shorten my sentence one minute.
And yet I sat before that same board five years later and listened to them talk to
me in the friendliest tones. And again, a year later, I appeared before them again
and received their assurance that I was deserving of another chance. They gave
me that chance and I went out five years in advance of the time set for my release.
Nor did I use any political or other influence whatever. Indeed, I had only one or
two letters of recommendation on file in my behalf, and these were from persons
who had no prestige or influential power with the state administration.

In that night in 1924 as I sat in my cell on the receiving gallery, my thoughts were
fog-bound. I had been able to face short terms with a certain degree of equipoise
for I could see through to the end; but now there was no end. Already dissipation
had stamped me with premature old age. After eleven years and three months I
would be fit for nothing, save to join the pathetic ranks of old broken-down prison
lags who, after making their weary rounds of the various prisons, usually wound up
by appearing voluntarily at some prison gate begging for admittance, pleading for
the privilege of entering and ending their miserable days in the only sort of home
they had ever known.
Yes, by that time, my nerve would be completely gone. I would not have enough
left to commit another crime in order to break back into prison. I would come
doddering back, burned out and shriveled up, whining and begging for a home and
finally a hole in the prison grave-yard. I could see that sort of end; I could see no
other.
It was to be eleven years and three months on the calendar; in the terms of
emotion it would be a thousand years. I hated myself that evening as no man has
ever hated. One does not know hate who has only hated the conditions in which he
lives; the emotion of hate that reaches no farther than to God, to decency, to
fairness, to other men, is not hate in its blackest and bitterest sense. One must
hate one's self, wholly, completely, utterly, really to know what hate means. And
that is the way I hated on this dreary, futureless evening. I could see but one way
out. A safety razor blade would twist me out of my misery. But a better way would
be to die with the guns of the guards roaring in my ears.
At least if I was rubbed out in an effort to escape I would have made that one
effort. The chances were one in a thousand perhaps, for success. But, there was
still that one chance. It would be better to gamble everything on it, than to go out
the cowardly way.
As I was trying to choose between these two extremes, I hadn't known that self
destruction actually was a cowardly way to avoid a bad situation. The prisoner in
charge of the gallery brought this fact home to me. I told him in answer to his
comment, Looks kinda tough for you this trip, that if it got too tough I knew how to
remedy the situation.
He cackled mirthlessly, You won't be the first weakling to take that way out.
It takes nerve to wind up your own ball of yarn, was my reply.
He cackled again. No, you're wrong, it takes nerve to face the jolt you're facing --
more nerve than you've got, old man. It's easier to hand in your checks.
I hadn't thought of self destruction in that light. Obviously he was right. Under the
circumstances, it required little courage to face death; but to face the lingering
torment of this living death, eleven years and three months of it -- to face it -- that
took real courage.
It was courage, thank God, that challenged me to combat. I would not advertise to
the whole prison that I was too much of a weakling to pay the piper. Nor would I
knuckle down and become the docile, broken-spirited lamb. I would face the music,
but I would face it as a rebel, a firebrand, a prison revolutionist.
Naturally, in this attitude of violence, I did nothing but injure myself. It was the
same attitude I carried with me into the dungeon some three years later -- and left
there, never again to be resurrected.

That I could use the love medium to gain my freedom never occurred to me of my
own accord. After I had discovered that medium and had began to apply it to my
life and the lives of those around me, I was so thoroughly in harmony with my
environment that time, place and conditions meant nothing. The days and nights
came and went with a smoothness and velocity that was simply astounding. I
seldom could tell any one the day of the week, and the date of the month was a
thing I rarely ever knew. Once I was asked the day of the week. I didn't know. Then
I was asked the date of the month, and I didn't know that either.
Well, do you know what year it is ? asked my questioner. And studying some time I
was able to answer that one. But my questioner promptly informed me that I was a
year behind time.
So one day when a fellow, and he an official, asked why I didn't try to get my case
up and get out, I was forced to admit that it had been a long time since I had
thought of my freedom. I did think of it after that, however, although not in a way
to disturb my peace of mind. I had reached the point where, like my old cell-mate, I
didn't care where I was on earth, so long as I could carry on my experiments for
the improvement of myself and others. The idea of gaining my freedom now
held out its reward, not in the freedom itself, but in the proof or
demonstration that it could be gained by the application of love and
thought to creative principle.
When I made up my mind to try it I bumped into a string of questioning qualms.
Always before I had used the principle for service to others or for the purpose of
furthering my own spiritual and mental interests. To use it now merely to gain my
freedom left a selfish tang in my soul that I drew back from in a sort of moral recoil.
Even though Dad assured me that my qualms were unwarranted, the feeling
continued to persist.
In meditation I sought assurance which didn't come immediately. The reason: I was
shutting myself from the reservoir of intuitive knowledge by squeezing the channel
with strain. I learned that when you seek the super consciousness for knowledge
about a particular thing, you usually wind up disappointed with knowledge about
nothing. These are most unsatisfying meditations.
My meditations before had been all-embracing. I sought meditation for the sheer
joy of entering that far-flung realm of super joy. And consequently, having no
human desire to hinder bodily relaxation or to prevent the gradual slowing down
process of the heart and lungs to the state of pulse lessness and breathlessness, I
had been able to contact general wisdom almost at a moment's notice. But with a
particular desire in my mind, I could neither relax nor receive, because the nature
of the desire was always there, and nothing else could get through or around it.
However, as it later panned out, these futile attempts did impress themselves upon
my subconscious mind, and the subconscious mind, in turn, took its directions and
passed them on to me.
These directions were specific, but not understandable as applying to my problem.
I got them in the form of a dream during subconscious meditation. I did not at first
act upon them, because they seemed to have no connection with the one thing I
wanted to know: Would I now be justified in using the creative principle against
others in order to influence them to grant me a favor I had come to consider purely
selfish?
Finally one evening, during a desire less meditation, I received the
information that there was no such thing as selfishness. There was a
misuse of supply and a right use of supply.
And with this, of course, I realized that my freedom rightly used would conform to
life's purpose of spiritual growth, just the same as my imprisonment rightly used
had done. We were punished not for our right uses of law, but for our misuses of
law.

The directions I received had to do with the transmission of telepathic thought over
a distance of many miles. The object of this thought-transmission was the
chairman of the parole-board.
It entailed my having to learn something of this man's habits. Which I did, working
through a friend of mine in the prison record clerk's office, and he in turn working
through the private secretary of the chairman. I learned a great deal about the
home the chairman occupied, its location. I learned that he usually retired at ten-
thirty each night that business or pleasure did not prevent. Also, that for about two
hours before retiring he sat alone in his library with his books. I learned many
details about this library, its general appointments, its shape and location in the
house, the reading lamp and the chair where he sat.
With all this information in my hands I was ready to begin the biggest
experiment I had yet undertaken, that of impressing my personality upon
the mind of a man across a vast distance of space. I had achieved the
same thing many times at close range, and I had no doubt but that the
same thing could be accomplished at long range. And I might add that
this very faith was a great aid to that end.
What I did therefore was to visualize the chairman in his favorite chair in his library.
I did this every night so as not to miss him on the nights he actually occupied this
place. I surrounded him with an imaginary atmosphere of peace, contentment,
comfort, receptiveness. I thought of him in terms of love, of Christ likeness. I talked
to him with my thoughts, wishing him well. Night after night, in this imaginary
manner, I hovered round. For several months I kept faithfully and patiently at the
experiment, not once allowing myself to become discouraged in the face of the fact
that nothing seemed to happen. Indeed, as the effort was extended, it seemed to
become almost effortless. In time it grew into a pleasant endeavor. I grew to feel
an exuberant joy in paying this man my nightly visit, and I also came to feel that he
was finding his library period more and more pleasurable.
Eventually there was added to my directions another piece of business that
apparently had no connection whatever to the business at hand, but was so urgent
that I was forced to get in touch with Dad Trueblood, who of course had been
informed of my experiment from the first.
I was given an urge to write an essay on a certain topic and to submit it to the
editor of a certain welfare magazine. At this time the rules of the prison had not yet
been lowered to that place where prisoners were allowed to write for publication.
This restriction, however, was lifted soon after the event just described.
Dad's advice was prompt and to the point.
Write the essay and send it, he said.
But the warden won't stand for that, I told him. Besides, what do I know about
writing?
In this case you may find out you don't need to know an-thing about it after you
get started. If the urge is genuine, the thing will write itself. Anyway it's up to you
to go ahead.
Well, I told him, I don't know what it's all about, but I'm game to try anything once.
I don't know whether the essay was good or not. Dad said it was. The warden said
it was. The chairman of the board said it was. The point is, it was because of it that
I was called that second time before the parole-board, five years after my first
appearance before that body, at which time I had been told I would never be called
there again for consideration of parole matters. As a matter of fact I wasn't called
there for the consideration of parole matters. But of that later.
After I had finished the essay I carried it to the warden and asked him if I could
send it to the magazine indicated. His answer was a flat refusal. But he read the
essay. When he had finished, he looked at me with surprise.
Did you write this? he wanted to know.
I admitted the fact.
Well, it's good, he said, and I'm going to put it in the hands of the chairman of the
board.
As I rose to leave he added: You've been making a mighty good record lately. Keep
it up.
When the parole board held its next session at the prison I was called before it. My
essay was lying on the table in front of the chairman when I entered. I was greeted
cordially and told to sit down. The chairman informed me that I was not there
because they had decided to reopen my case. He picked up the essay and asked
me if I had written it.
Yes, sir, I replied. Or rather it was written for me. My work was merely
stenographic.
He laughed. Well, whoever wrote it, he said, has expressed sentiments that make
for good citizenship.
There was more said, of course, and while I have not given the verbatim account of
the conversation, because I do not remember the precise words, I have employed
dialogue to express the general trend of the thought. So it has been throughout the
writing of this book wherever conversation has been employed. Where I have been
able to record conversation verbatim, I've done so; where I haven't, due to a lack
of memory, I've tried to copy the actual as nearly as I could.
Following this incident, I no longer pursued my experimentation along the
telepathic line. I knew that the chairman of the board now had me in mind and I
knew that my prison conduct was being closely watched at the chairman's request.

I conducted myself as before. I went ahead with my work and proceeded to forget
all about my freedom. When an opportunity arose whereby I could use the creative
principle constructively against the problems of my fellows, I did so. A year thus
passed. Then I was called before the board again. This time to receive my freedom.

The subject of thought transference is today under the fire of controversy. I have
neither desire nor intention of presenting this experience as a contribution to telepathic
lore. The argument for or against has no appeal for me whatever. There may not be
such a possibility as transferring thought although my belief is on the positive side. The
weight of my evidence is found in the results obtained through my experiments.
In this chapter I have described as nearly as I was able, the exact method used to gain
my freedom, to open the door of my prison. That this method was responsible for the
opening of that door, I sincerely believe to be true. The reader may believe otherwise.
That is a privilege I deny no one. But I might say in addition, that apart from my
description of what occurred, there is some documentary evidence. The record of this
prison will show that I entered there in the year previously mentioned; that my
sentence was set at eleven years and three months; and that without political or other
influences of any kind, I was released from there five years in advance of the time fixed
by law.
My experience in the prison hospital was rich with evidence that thought was easily
transferred from one mind to another. In one of the many cases of hysterically induced
diseases, I used the telepathic method exclusively.
The boy was a patient in the tubercular ward. A few months before he had been in the
best of health. Then one day he picked up a handkerchief near the hospital, took it to
his cell, washed it and began to use it. A day or two later a friend seeing him with an
outside store-bought handkerchief, asked him where he got it, and the boy told him.
Why you big fool, said the friend. I'll bet one of them T.B.'s over there threw it out of the
window. They're always doing things like that. They want other people to catch the T.B.
The boy became panicky and began to brood constantly on what his friend had told
him. His appetite began to fade away. He lost weight and lived in daily and nightly
dread of the terrifying disease. Then he caught a slight cold and developed a cough. He
was sure he had taken tuberculosis. He came on the sick-call to the hospital and voiced
his fears to the doctor. He was put in a room while an examination was made. He
carried no temperature; a sputum test revealed the presence of no germs. But he could
not be convinced, and a few weeks later when another test was made, he was running a
temperature and the sputum revealed germs.
In the tuberculosis ward I tried every way I could think of to rid his mind of this morbid
disease-thought. But the thought was so deeply grooved in his subconscious mind that
no amount of conscious suggestion could counter-groove it.
I decided to try telepathy on him while he slept. I knew of course that these patients
were supersensitive and super receptive to thought force during their waking hours. But
I had never tried to influence one of them while he slept.
At night time in the ward, after nine o'clock, all the lights were turned off, except one
red one in the middle of the room. Thus I could slip in quietly, make my way through the
semi-darkness, and thus reach his bed-side without disturbing his slumber. Crouching
directly behind the head of his bed, I mentally called his name, concentrating the full
force of my faculties upon its clear deliberate and sonorous enunciation.
At first I got no visible response. Duties intervening, I was compelled to conduct my
experiment at short intervals throughout that first night. The following night also
evinced nothing
in the way of reward for my efforts. But about three o'clock in the morning of the third
night, he began to manifest a sense of restlessness during the period I slowly
pronounced his name. When my thoughts of him were withdrawn, he would
immediately become quiet and begin again to breathe evenly.
Of course, I was elated. To me these incidents were not the accidental disturbances of
dream states. I was firmly convinced that he was being influenced, not by internal
forces, but by a force of thought exuded from my own mind. However, before I accepted
this conviction, I saw the same thing demonstrated repeatedly in more than a hundred
precise experiments.
The last one of its kind conducted, that is, in which his response was merely a nervous
display, happened in the presence of the night-warder of the hospital and the night-
captain of the guard. More than a dozen times they witnessed his disturbance while I
called to him.. And then when I would raise my hand, indicating to them that I was
going to withdraw my influence, they saw the tension leave him while he began his
quiet even process of breathing once more.
The next experiment brought forth in addition to his physical reaction, a verbal
response. Yet I refused to accept this as anything genuinely connected with the
experiment until he had repeated it numerous times during the period of my
operations. He at no time spoke over the one word while the experiment was going on.
That one word was mother. It was garbled somewhat, as most words spoken in dreams.
But the thing that was striking about it was that the inflection was always the same. It
was as though his mother appeared to him in a dream and as though he had been
expecting her to come. Now the boy's mother was dead; but it was obvious the memory
of her still influenced his sub-conscious life.
At this point I made an assumption that, naturally, I had no way of proving whether or
not it was working out as I assumed it to be working out. But when he would speak the
word mother, I would assume that her personality and influence were with him in a
dream, and I endeavored to make her say the things I wanted her to say. In other
words, while her personality was visible to him in his dream, I assumed that I was she
and I spoke to him with my thoughts in terms of his health, seeking always, through
telepathic suggestion, to counteract the effect of disease-thought held in his sub-
consciousness, and to replace the disease thought with the thought of health.
This treatment, together with a carefully planned tissue-building diet, I am certain was
responsible for this patient's final and complete recovery from the disease that had
taken him very close to death. I am aware that this incident can prove nothing on
behalf of the believers of thought-transference. But then the motive for my experiment
was not to seek proof for or against a theory. My first interest was in the welfare of my
patient, and my gratitude came when I was able to witness his steady but certain
progress toward recovery. My big thrill of joy arrived on the day the doctor dismissed
him from the hospital with a high rating of health.
Love and the creative principle. These words mean absolutely nothing. But to
take what they symbolize and incorporate it into the daily livingness of one's
life, means that one has the key that will unlock all the doors that limit one,
in proportion as one's capacity increases for receiving and using creative
power through the medium of LOVE.
Jesus could use creative power greatly, because He LOVED greatly. When
one's sense of brotherly love is strong enough to die for the future
betterment of one's fellowmen, such a one becomes a magnificent user of
creative power and leaves a heritage the like of which has kept and will
continue to keep the human family in existence and growing toward its goal
of spiritual perfection.
What I have been able to achieve with creative power is small when compared
to what I should like to achieve. In the minds of my readers, my achievement
may not seem great; but to me it is monumental. I have no doubt, that
without this key, my prison door would still be locked against me, had I not
died long ago from the toxic poisons generated in my system by hate and the
philosophy of negation.
For this key I am humbly and enormously grateful.

You might also like