You are on page 1of 3

23_CARRIER’S LIABILITY

Relevant Legislation

 The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (“the 1999 Act”)1 as


amended by the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
(“the 2002 Act”)

 The Carriers’ Liability Regulations 2002 (as amended)2

 Council Directive 2001/51/EC

Background

1. The generic reference to Carrier’s Liability refers to two3 broad areas:

(a) the first issue is the liability of carriers for undocumented or inadequately
documented passengers; and

(b) the second ground for liability is in respect of clandestine entrants.

2. Part II of the 1999 Act, as amended by section 125 and Schedule 8 of the 2002
Act, allows the Secretary of State to impose penalties or charges on carriers for
clandestine entrants and improperly documented passengers. The penalties
imposed must comply with Council Directive 2001/51/EC which stipulates
either a maximum charge of not less than 5,000 euros (or equivalent national
currency), or a minimum of not less than 3,000 euros . Under this Directive
sanctions must be “dissuasive, effective and proportionate”.

Passengers without proper documents (section 40, 1999 Act)

3. The Secretary of State can impose a penalty on a carrier when a person on


arrival in the United Kingdom by ship or aircraft is required to produce a valid
identity document4 and fails to do so, or when a person who is required under
the Immigration Rules to obtain permission before arrival does not have such
permission (which should include a person who requires permission to transit the
United Kingdom).

4. The penalty of up to £2,000 is set out in section 40(2) of the 1999 Act, and there
is a power to substitute the sum by order under subsection (10).

1
Part II.
2
2002 No. 2817
3
The liability of carriers to remove people from the United Kingdom, and in certain circumstances to
pay the costs of their detention pending removal is dealt with in section 4 and 5 and Schedule 2 and 3
of the Immigration Act 1971. This is beyond the scope of this Note.
4
An identity document is a passport or other identity document establishing identity and nationality.

1
5. The Home Office has been considering a two-tier fixed charge to replace the
current single charge to reflect the value they attribute to their Approved Gate
Check (AGC) system5.

6. Pursuant to section 40(7), it is possible by order to extend this provision to a


person who arrives it the United Kingdom by train and to make consequential
amendments to the provision.

7. The penalty is imposed where the required document is not produced on arrival.

8. However, if the carrier demonstrates the production of a bona fide document to


him, his employee or agent by the individual on embarking the vessel (see
section 40(4)) but subsequently destroys it en route to the United Kingdom, the
carrier does not incur liability. In practice this means that carriers can either take
copies of documents on embarkation or operate an Approved Gate Check
procedure.

9. For these purposes, a carrier shall be entitled to regard a document as valid


unless it is reasonably apparent that it is false, or that it does not relate to the
person who produced it (see section 40(5)). The courts have interpreted the
“reasonably apparent” test as meaning that forgeries must be of “a standard
which a trained representative of the carrying company, examining the document
carefully but briefly and without the use of technological aids could reasonably
be expected to detect”.

Clandestine entrants (Section 32 of the 1999 Act)

10. The Secretary of State is able to impose a penalty on a carrier who is responsible
for a clandestine entrant. The penalty that the Secretary of State may impose is
currently not fixed, but there is a prescribed maximum (see section 32(2A) of the
1999 Act). It is currently set at £2,000.6

11. The penalty may be imposed on more than one responsible person, as long as it
does not in aggregate amount to more than the prescribed maximum. The
maximum penalty is prescribed by statutory instrument, subject to the negative
resolution procedure, and is currently set at £4,000.7

12. The definition of a clandestine entrant is in section 32(1) of the 1999 Act,
including the relevant interpretations in section 32(10) and section 43. In broad
terms the a person is a clandestine entrant if he arrives in the United Kingdom
concealed in a vehicle, ship, aircraft etc

5
AGC status is granted in return for an audited high standard of document checking and security
procedures at a port of embarkation, a good level of co-operation from the carrier, and a satisfactory
record in respect of its liabilities. If UKBA prescribed measures are in place, a limited presumption
that satisfactory checks have been carried out applies.
6
The Carriers’ Liability Regulations 2002, 2002 No. 2817
7
The Carriers’ Liability Regulations 2002, 2002 No. 2817

2
13. The Secretary of State must have regard to a code of practice specifying matters
that will be considered by him in determining the amount of the penalty. A draft
of the code, and any revisions to it, are be laid before Parliament before coming
into force (see section 32A of the 1999 Act, as amended by the Nationality,
Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 section 125, Schedule 8, paragraphs 1, 3).

14. It is not be possible to impose a penalty if any of the carriers responsible has a
defence in relation to that clandestine entrant. The defences are set out in section
34 of the 1999 Act.

15. Under section 34(3) of the 1999 Act, where it is alleged a person is liable to a
penalty under section 32 for bringing a clandestine entrant to the United
Kingdom, it is a defence to show that:
 he did not know and had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that a
clandestine entrant was, or might be, concealed in the transporter;
 there was an effective system in operation in relation to the transporter
to prevent the carriage of clandestine entrants; and
 on the occasion concerned, the person or persons responsible for
operating that system did so properly.

16. A Code of Practice, which is made under section 33 of the 1999 Act, sets out the
measures to be taken and the procedures to be followed by persons operating a
system for preventing the carriage of clandestine entrants to the United
Kingdom, in respect of vehicles. Regard will be had to this Code of Practice in
determining whether such a system is effective (section 34(4) of the 1999 Act).

02/11/2009

You might also like