Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LIFE (“The Financial Instrument for the Environment”) is a programme launched by the European Commission and coordinated
by the Environment Directorate-General (LIFE Unit - E.4).
The contents of the publication “LIFE and endangered plants: Conserving Europe’s threatened flora” do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the institutions of the European Union.
Authors: João Pedro Silva (Technical expert), Justin Toland, Wendy Jones, Jon Eldridge, Edward Thorpe, Maylis Campbell,
Eamon O’Hara (Astrale GEIE-AEIDL, Communications Team Coordinator). Managing Editor: Philip Owen, European Commission,
Environment DG, LIFE Unit – BU-9, 02/1, 200 rue de la Loi, B-1049 Brussels. LIFE Focus series coordination: Simon Goss (LIFE
Communications Coordinator), Evelyne Jussiant (DG Environment Communications Coordinator). The following people also
worked on this issue: Piotr Grzesikowski, Juan Pérez Lorenzo, Frank Vassen, Karin Zaunberger, Aixa Sopeña, Georgia Valaoras,
Lubos Halada, Mikko Tira, Michele Lischi, Chloé Weeger, Katerina Raftopoulou. Production: Monique Braem. Graphic design:
Daniel Renders, Anita Cortés (Astrale GEIE-AEIDL). Acknowledgements: Thanks to all LIFE project beneficiaries who contributed
comments, photos and other useful material for this report. Photos: Unless otherwise specified; photos are from the respective
projects. This issue of LIFE Focus is published in English with a print-run of 5,000 copies and is also available online.
Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union.
New freephone number: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
ISBN 978-92-79-08815-5
ISSN 1725-5619
doi: 10.2779/99297�
��������������
Printed in Belgium
Ecolabel Flower
Printed on recycled paper that has been awarded
the EU Ecolabel for graphic paper (http://ec.europa.eu/ecolabel/)
LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p.
Patrick Murphy
Plants are vital to almost every aspect of our daily lives. They provide us with food, fibres, medicines, fuel, shelter,
clothing and the air we breathe. Many animal species are also directly dependent on plants for their survival.
Plants are essential constituents of ecosystems and play a key role in the Earth’s system.
Europe is blessed with a high rate of diversity, but, despite their undeniable importance, plants everywhere are
under threat. Some 21% of Europe’s vascular plant species (flowering plants, conifers and ferns) are classified as
threatened according to the IUCN. Half of the continent’s 4,700 vascular plant endemics are in danger of extinc-
tion and 64 have already become extinct. In a number of European countries more than two-thirds of the existing
plant habitats types are endangered. Major land-use changes from agriculture and forestry, habitat destruction,
fragmentation and degradation, direct impacts by economic activities and invasive alien species are all rapidly
eroding our plant communities. Climate change will further aggravate these pressures.
LIFE, the financial instrument for the environment, has been a cornerstone of plant conservation efforts, especially
within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network.
In total, from 1992-2007 some 970 projects received EU co-funding under the LIFE-Nature component of the
LIFE programme. Although only 33 of these projects directly targeted the conservation of plants listed under the
annexes of the Habitats Directive, a far greater number of projects targeted plant conservation within a broader
context – for example, under habitat actions, Natura 2000 network site management plans, or more general
actions.
This brochure explores the challenges for conservation of Europe’s endangered plants and highlights the role of
the LIFE programme in helping to halt biodiversity loss, and to restore threatened habitats and natural systems.
From Romania to northern Finland, France’s Seine Valley to Spain’s Sierra Nevada mountains, the Mediterranean
to Macaronesia, LIFE has supported a range of successful projects, helping to restore habitats and protecting
endangered plants.
LIFE has also helped to promote a new concept – the plant micro-reserve (PMR) – first developed in the Spanish
region of Valencia, and since successfully implemented in Slovenia and the island of Crete (see pp. 17-22).
Now, LIFE+, with a budget of over €2 billion, will continue to offer robust support to the conservation of plant
species and of biodiversity in general across Europe.
Preventing the disappearance of so many species of plants is one of the major challenges that must be addressed
in order to achieve the goal of halting the loss of Europe’s biodiversity.
Patrick Murphy
Head of Unit – Nature & Biodiversity
European Commission, DG Environment
Background to Europe’s Plant micro-reserves: Restoration of
wild plants.................... 3 from concept to habitats....................... 37
implementation............... 17
European wild plants: Austria: Lake Constance
status and threats.............. 3 Greece: Conservation forget-me-not flourishes
of endangered flora on in Bregenz once more
European biodiversity
Crete............................... 20 thanks to LIFE-Nature.... 38
policy and plant
conservation..................... 5 Germany: Protecting and
Mediterranean flora.... 23
developing the Benningen
LIFE’s contribution to Cyprus: Conservation of Marsh............................. 41
EU plant conservation ..... 7 unique flora and
Romania: Conserving
habitats........................... 24
forest habitats, preventing
Endangered plants in
Italy: Conserving soil erosion and guarding
general.......................... 9
the ‘critically endangered’ against avalanches......... 42
Finland: Stakeholder Sicilian fir and helping to Czech Republic: Preserving
participation in managing ensure its long-term the beauty and biodiversity
endangered plant survival........................... 27 of the Moravian Karst..... 45
populations...................... 10
Spain: Protecting Further projects
France: Saving two extraordinary biodiversity focusing on wetlands... 46
Norman plants................. 12 in the Sierra Nevada....... 30
List of available LIFE
Germany: Grassland publications.................... 49
protection in Bavaria ...... 14
Macaronesian flora..... 31
Spain: Conserving five
Portugal: Managing and
priority species in
preserving Asphodelus
the Canary Islands.......... 32
bento-rainhae.................. 16
Portugal: Restoring
Madeira’s laurel forest.... 34
Background to Europe’s wild plants LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p.
Photo: LIFE
has invaded the UK acid woods and
heathland causing problems in many Importance of plants: their
important oak forests on the West goods and services Plants are valued for many reasons,
coast of Scotland. In addition to the including aesthetics: Lady’s slipper
environmental consequences, invasive Plants are universally recognised as orchid (Cypripedium calceolus)
alien species may also have significant an essential part of biological diversity
economical and social impacts. and a vital resource (i.e., in maintain- The vast majority of medicinal and
ing carbon dioxide and oxygen equi- aromatic plant species used today
Pollution and disease librium in the atmosphere). In addition is collected from the wild. Unfortu-
Pollution is the release of chemical, to the small number of crop plants nately, such a practice can sometimes
physical, biological or radioactive used for basic food and fibres, many result in unsustainable practices. For
contaminants in the environment. It is thousands of wild plants have consid- example, wolf’s bane (Arnica mon-
sometimes not visible to the naked eye erable economic and cultural impor- tana), used to treat sprains, bruises,
and can disperse through air, water and tance and potential, providing food, and muscle aches, and great yellow
other mediums into which it is emitted. fuel, clothing, shelter and medicine. gentian (Gentiana lutea) are harvested
As a result, its direct effects, especially throughout Europe (especially in Bul-
on plant life, can sometimes be hard An estimated 50,000 - 70,000 plant garia and Romania). These plants
to spot. Pollution is a big problem for species are used in medicines are included in Annex V of the Habi-
plants. For example, Pesticides are throughout the world. They make an tats Directive, which identifies plants
designed to allow farmers to increase essential contribution to healthcare (and animals) requiring management
their yields (and gardeners to keep and provide an important source of measures because of exploitation
out weeds), but their misuse and income in rural areas. concerns.
over-application can adversely affect
wild plants in the area. The misuse of
insecticides also affects plants, as it
Effects of climate change on plant diversity:
can impact on the populations of pol-
Species are ‘left behind’ as they are unable to change their distribution fast enough.
linators (such as bees) that some plants
Species with long life cycles and/or slow dispersal are particularly vulnerable.
need to reproduce. Soils can also be
Some isolated species are particularly vulnerable, as they may have ‘nowhere
contaminated with heavy metals, which
to go’. These include:
few plants can tolerate. At the very least
l A rctic and alpine species, and island endemics.
contamination will cause reduced plant
l C oastal species which are ‘squeezed’ between human settlements and rising
production and ecosystems become
sea levels.
more vulnerable to other threats.
l P lant genetic composition may change in response to the selection pressure
of climate change.
Climate change
l S ome plant communities or species associations may be lost as species
More recently, Europe’s plants are
move and adapt at different rates.
facing an unequivocal warming of the
l Increased invasions by alien species may occur, as conditions become more
climate. According to the latest projec-
suitable for exotic species while native species become less suited to their
tions more than half of the plant species
environment.
assessed could be vulnerable or threat-
l M any plant communities act as ‘sinks’ (store carbon), which helps to offset
ened by 2080. The impact of climatic
carbon emissions. However, over the next 70 years, the effects of climate
change on plants mean many terrestrial sinks may become sources, for
� Thuiller
��������� W.
���������������������������������
et al. (2005) “Climate change example the bogs.
threats to plant diversity in Europe”.
Background to Europe’s wild plants LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p.
European heads of state agreed at sites, and that effective conservation loss by 2010. Many of the biodiversity-
the 2001 summit in Gothenburg to and sustainable use of biodiversity, rich habitats in need of conservation
halt biodiversity loss by 2010. The and the maintenance of essential are situated in, or close to, agricultural
following year, the parties to the Con- ecosystem services, also requires land, where inappropriate agricultural
vention on Biological Diversity (CBD) action in the wider countryside. For practices have reduced biological
and some 130 world leaders commit- plants, such action is provided for by diversity. The presence of some plant
ted themselves to a significant reduc- specific requirements in the EU Habi- species and habitats that are depend-
tion in the rate of biodiversity loss by tats Directive (92/43/EEC) and more ent on extensive farming, for example,
the same target date. A Commission generally by the integration of biodi- has declined in recent decades.
Communication of May 2006, “Halt- versity concerns into agricultural and
ing the Loss of Biodiversity by 2010 other policies. EU Rural Development Policy (Council
– and Beyond”, [COM(2006)216 . Reg (EC) No.1257/1999) aims to rec-
reconfirmed Europe’s commitment to The 2001 Biodiversity Action Plan for oncile agriculture with the objectives of
implementation of the CBD. Agriculture (COM/2001/0162) aims to the EU nature conservation policy. This
reduce the negative impacts of farming goal is achieved by financing agri-envi-
Two particular threats to EU biodiver- practices by promoting the sustainable ronmental measures that go beyond
sity are highlighted in the Communica- use of biological resources. It is one the usual good farming practices and
tion. First, “spatial development”, for of the four biodiversity action plans, that have a direct impact on the con-
which Member States have a particular covering 1) conservation of natural servation of European flora, particularly
responsibility, through improved plan- resources, 2) agriculture, 3) fisheries, through the maintenance of extensive
ning, to reconcile development needs and 4) economic and development co-
with the conservation of biodiversity operation outside Europe, included in � http://www.ndp.ie/documents/publica-
and maintenance of ecosystem serv- the EU’s Sixth Environmental Action tions/reg_cir/CR12571999.pdf
ices. The second threat is the potential Programme (6th EAP), approved by
impact of climate change, where rising the Council of Ministers in 2001. It also Bogs: a priority for conservation habitat
temperatures are already having a bio- has the goal of stemming biodiversity important for certain plant species,
such as the insectivorous sundew
logical impact, including earlier timing
(Drosera rotundifolia)
of spring events, and poleward and
� http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/
upward shifts in ranges in plant, as well LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1992L0043:
as animal species. 20070101:EN:PDF
� http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/
l28024.htm
The EU approach recognises that bio-
diversity is not evenly spread, and that
certain species are more at risk than
others. Consequently, it affords spe-
cial attention to the protection of sites
of highest nature value and species
most at risk included in the Habitats
and Birds directives. However, this
approach also recognises that much
biodiversity resides outside these
� http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/
biodiversity/comm2006/index_en.htm
Background to Europe’s wild plants
systems and support for agriculture in est) to the Habitats Directive list the and low forest vegetation with Quercus
Natura 2000 zones. habitats and species whose conserva- alnifolia (9390*); the rock rose (Cistus
tion requires the designation of SACs. palhinhae) is the main species within
The recent reforms of the Common Some of them are defined as “priority” maritime wet heath formations (5140*)
Agricultural Policy (CAP) have also ena- habitats or species (in danger of disap- in the southwest of Portugal; and sea
bled further integration of biodiversity pearing). grass (Posidonia oceanica) is the main
concerns into agricultural policy and species within Mediterranean sea
the 2008 review of the CAP provides Annex II identifies 324 animal species grass habitats (1120*).
an important opportunity to further whose conservation requires the des-
strengthen and support measures for ignation of SACs. However, the number Other habitat types with broader distri-
farmland and forest biodiversity. For of plant species listed is much higher bution are also very important for some
example, national statutory require- – 587, or 64%, of the total (see Fig.1). plant species such as orchids. The dry
ments derived from EU directives cov- Moreover, some 204 (80%) of listed to semi-dry calcareous grasslands hab-
ering birds, habitats, nitrates and pesti- plant species are priority – compared itat (6210), which is widely distributed
cides are now included in the accepted with just 51 for animals. around Europe, can be home to impor-
standards for good farming practice. tant populations of rare orchid species.
The distribution of plant diversity Where this is the case, the habitat is
Natura 2000 network and across Europe is not even. A full 60% considered a priority for conservation.
plant conservation of the plant species included in Annex For example, important endangered
II occur within the Mediterranean and orchid species (e.g., genus Ophrys)
The Habitats Directive has focused on Macaronesian regions, according to are dependent on calcareous substrate
the requirement of Member States to the reference lists for biogeographical semi-natural dry grasslands or forests
establish a network of special areas regions (EU-25). (e.g., Cypripedium calceolus).
!.)-!,3
of conservation (SACs) that, together 0,!.43
with)NVERTEBRATES
the special protection areas As well as the plant species included Finally, Article 13 of the Habitats Direc-
(SPAs) designated under the Birds in Annex
0LANTS II of the directive, there are tive requires that Member States should
Directive
&ISH (79/409/EEC , make up the
)
habitats that are characterised by high also establish both within and outside
Natura 2000 network. rates of endemic plants, which are nor- the Natura 2000 network, a system of
!MPHIBIANS mally found in restricted areas. These strict protection of endangered plant
2EPTILES
Annexes I (natural -AMMALS habitat types of tend to be dominated by a particular species included in Annex lV (b) by pro-
Community interest) and II (animal plant species and often
&LOWERING 0LANTS !NGIOSPERMA are classi- hibiting the “deliberate picking, collect-
and plant species of Community inter-
4OTAL NUMBER !NNEX )) SPECIES fied as “priority natural habitat types” ing, cutting, uprooting or destruction”
under the directive. For example, the of such plants in their natural range in
endangered golden oak (Quercus the wild; and the “keeping, transport
!LPINE
!TLANTIC
"OREAL
#ONTINENTAL
-ACARONESIAN
-EDITERRANEAN
0ANNONIAN
� http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/
LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31979L0409: alnifolia) is the main species within a and sale or exchange” of specimens
EN:HTML -OSSES "RYOPHYTES Cyprus Annex I priority habitat – scrub of such species taken in the wild.
Figure I: EU-27 plant and animal species listed Figure II: Annex II plant species
in Annex II of the Habitats Directive by biogeographical region
!.)-!,3 0,!.43
Source: ETC, 2004 - excludes Black Sea & Steppic regions (Bulgaria, Romania)
)NVERTEBRATES
0LANTS
&ISH
Source: European Topic Centre for Biodiversity (ETC), 2007
!MPHIBIANS
2EPTILES
&ISH -AMMALS
!TLANTIC
"OREAL
#ONTINENTAL
-ACARONESIAN
-EDITERRANEAN
0ANNONIAN
-AMMALS
#ONIFERS
-OSSES &ERNS 'YMNOSPERMAE
"RYOPHYTA 0TERIDOPHYTA
-OSSES "RYOPHYTES
4OTAL NUMBER OF !NNEX )) SPECIES
#ONIFERS 'YMNOSPERMAE !NNEX )) PLANT SPECIES !NNEX )) PRIORITY PLANT SPECIES
&ERNS 0TERIDOPHYTA
!.)-!,3 0,!.43
)NVERTEBRATES
Background to Europe’s wild plants LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p.
LIFE’s contribution
to EU plant conservation
Since its beginning in 1992, LIFE1, the financial instrument for the environment, has been a corner-
stone of plant conservation efforts in Europe, especially within the boundaries of the Natura 2000
network of protected sites. Now with the launch of LIFE+2, the new financial instrument for the
environment, with an overall budget of €2 billion, LIFE will continue to offer robust support to the
protection of plant species in Europe.
In total, from 1992-2006 some 970 objectives often involves carrying out
projects received EU co-funding complex actions, which differ consider-
under the LIFE-Nature component of ably according to each individual plant
Photo: LIFE00 NAT/IT/007239
l ����������������������������������
combining local conservation meas- plant species Viola hispida and viding future sustainability for the
ures (in situ) and off-site actions (ex Biscutella neustriaca and as a result conservation of plant and habitats
situ) such as plant nurseries the definition of new Natura 2000 within the Natura 2000 network.
l �����������������������������������
increasing plant species knowledge sites and management plans. l A w a re n e s s - r a i s i n g : several
- by gathering scientific knowledge l L
and or rights acquisition: actions projects produced leaflets, mono-
(new populations, genetic studies, targeting the protection of plant graphs or manuals. Projects also
etc.) to be used in the development populations and conservation of implemented traineeship schemes
and implementation of protection, their habitats in certain locations. and raised awareness among local
management or recovery plans l D
irect conservation actions: for stakeholders (farmers, environment
l ��������������������������������
increasing public awareness and the conservation of plant species agents, etc), schools and the gen-
knowledge of plant species – (nor- and their habitats: ex situ – creation eral public. These actions helped
mally very low) together with the of nurseries, in-vitro propagation, to improve general knowledge
establishment of partnerships with germoplasm banks – and in situ – of Europe’s plant species and to
stakeholders at local level. recovery of degraded areas, habitat improve awareness of the impor-
restoration, alien species eradica- tance of their conservation.
Financed actions vary considerably, tion, establishment of fences, etc.
depending on the characteristics of l M
onitoring: included scientific LIFE also co-funded the purchase of
the targeted species or habitats. But monitoring during the project equipment needed for plant conser-
in general, the projects include: periods and after-LIFE in order to vation actions, helping to fund, for
l P reparatory actions: such as assess the longer-term impacts. example, the building of nurseries
the preparation of surveys, map- Some projects also included spe- and the supply of tools and resources
ping, definition of seedling proto- cies and habitats surveillance (for- of vital importance to continued local
cols, genetic analysis, etc. These est fires/collecting/grazing). plant conservation.
actions help to further knowledge l N
etworking: several projects
of the targeted species and set out organised expert meetings deal- Annex II identifies 587 plant species
improved conservation measures. ing with plant conservation and whose conservation requires the des-
Projects typically involve partner- established contacts with other ignation of special areas of conser-
ships with research institutions LIFE project beneficiaries both on vation that together with the special
– mainly European botanical gar- a national and European level. LIFE protection areas designated under
dens and the botany departments funding also played an important the Birds Directive, make up the
of European universities. For role in the establishment of part- Natura 2000 network. Of these, some
example, the French project LIFE99 nerships between stakeholders, 204 (80%) of plant species are prior-
NAT/F/006332 contributed to an managers and scientific person- ity. Thus looking to the future, under
increased knowledge of the dry nel, resulting in the establishment the new LIFE+ programme there are
-EDITERRANEAN
!TLANTIC
0ANNONIAN
#ONTINENTAL
-ACARONESIAN
!LPINE
"OREAL
grasslands of the Seine and Eure of management and conservation plenty of opportunities for LIFE project
valley habitat of the endangered plans with local support and pro- applications targeting plants.
0ROJECT TARGETED PLANTS . OF 0ROJECTS
Figure III: LIFE Nature projects targeting Figure IV: Number of projects by
Annex II plant species Biogeographical region (1992-2006)
Only EU member states with projects targeting plant species
Source: LIFE projects database
-EDITERRANEAN
!TLANTIC
0ANNONIAN
#ONTINENTAL
-ACARONESIAN
!LPINE
'REECE
2OMANIA
3LOVENIA
3PAIN
#ZECH 2EPUBLIC
&RANCE
'ERMANY
!USTRIA
#YPRUS
0ORTUGAL
(UNGARY
"OREAL
)TALY
&INLAND
LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p.
Europe’s native plants have been declining at an alarming rate. They face an
sures resulting from agriculture, forestry and urban sprawl. Climate change and
the spread of invasive alien species are additional threats. Across Europe, LIFE
and recovery plans within the framework of the Natura 2000 network. Here we
present some LIFE project examples that are helping combat the loss of Europe’s
plant diversity.
Endangered plants in general
Northern Finland is renowned for its Europe’s yellow marsh saxifrage is Natura 2000 sites in Kainuu, Northern
unusual environment that experiences very sensitive to hydrological changes Ostrobothnia, and southern and cen-
the midnight sun in summer and a and the plant has disappeared from tral Lapland.
harsh Arctic chill during winter. These extensive areas in central and north-
climatic extremes create a distinctive ern Europe. The lady’s slipper has also What did LIFE do?
set of conditions where a variety of suffered population decline from clear
flora and fauna have thrived in a mix cutting, soil preparation and plant col- Metsähallitus was aware of the impor-
of different habitats, ranging from wild lection. Loss of marsh habitats and tance of partnership approaches for
boreal forests to treeless alkaline fens herb-rich woodland has been particu- securing sustainable benefits from
and mires. Recent expansion of com- larly problematic and the fate of these habitat restoration work and so an
mercial forestry is now threatening species has been further threatened integrated proposal was designed
some of these natural habitats and in Finland as woodland meadows to include the project’s main stake-
the plant species that they support, become overgrown or taken over by holders.
such as the lady’s slipper (Cypripe- the spruce (Picea abies).
dium calceolus) and yellow marsh Four main project elements were
saxifrage (Saxifraga hirculus). Both of Lapland’s Natural Heritage govern- developed, covering the following
these plants are listed under Annex ment agency, Metsähallitus, recog- activities:
IV of the EU Habitats Directive as nised these problems and acknowl- l Inventories and restoration plans;
important species that require strict edged that it had special international l Land purchase;
protection. responsibility for the two species, l Biotope management actions; and
The first step of the project was to France’s Seine valley – the unique location of these two plants species
conduct a survey of the populations of
the target species. According to Car- 1,500 individuals were found at 10 These sites are mostly in the depart-
ine Douville of the Conservatoire des sites, while a total population of 2,000 ment of Upper Normandy but some are
Sites Naturels de Haute-Normandie, Biscutelle was identified at 40 sites. To in Ile-de-France.
the project beneficiary, the violet was be sustainable, the violet would need
particularly threatened and would to increase its population to 5,000 indi- What did LIFE do?
have already become extinct without viduals with at least 100 at each site;
the intervention of the project. Some the Biscutelle would require 50 per site. EU funding was a major factor in
attracting partners to the conservation
of these habitats. The beneficiary was
About the wildflowers supported by the Vexin regional park,
the National Botanical Conservatories
The Violet of Rouen is an annual flowering plant of of Bailleul and Bassin, the University
5-15 cm high. Its leaves are dark green and cove- of Rouen and the Agency for Green
red with tiny short white hairs that give the plant a Spaces in Île-de-France��������������
���������������������������
. The project
velvet-like appearance. Its flowers, which are about allowed the beneficiary to reintroduce
1.5-2 cm high, consist of five petals. The superior beneficial grazing practices in sec-
petals are slightly darker and the base of the inferior petal striated black on a tions of grassland that are still in good
white background. Seeds are contained in a three-valve capsule that opens condition or that were to be restored.
when ripe.
Restoring sites entailed manually cut-
The Biscutelle of Neustrie is a perennial with a thick root and is 20-40 cm ting away scrub and trees. On the ����
Île�-
in height. The root may divide into several branches creeping under ground de-France site, however, the project
and giving birth to several rosettes of leaves. Its lea- partner, the Vexin regional park, pur-
ves are dark green covered with tiny short, rough, chased a rotary shredder to remove
but not glandulous, hairs. Flowers are about 5 mm dense vegetation. Though the grass-
long, bright yellow and consist of four petals and lands would be grazed using existing
four sepals, typically crossed. Two big flat seeds flocks of sheep for the most part, the
are contained in each fruit. When ripe, seeds fall to project allowed the beneficiary to buy
a short distance from the parent plant. an additional flock of 100, and where
Endangered plants in general LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 13
Plant micro-reserves:
from concept to implementation
A plant micro-reserve (PMR) is a small plot of land (up to 20 ha – there is no minimum size) that
is of peak value in terms of plant richness endemism or rarity. The PMR is a permanent, statu-
tory reserve given over to long-term monitoring of plant species and vegetation types. As well
as providing strong protection to plants and substrate, traditional activities compatible with plant
conservation are allowed within the micro-reserve.
Europe’s first plant micro-reserves The success of each PMR is meas- flora appears in micro-populations
were set up in 1994 by the Regional ured by the rate of incorporation of fragmented throughout the whole
Wildlife Service of the Generalitat three indicators: priority habitats, region. These areas of high botanic
Valenciana, the autonomous govern- endemic taxa and threatened taxa. value also include 33 habitats listed
ment of the Valencia region, with the in Annexe I of the Habitats Directive,
support of the LIFE programme. Valencia pioneers the PMR of which 15 are priority habitats.
Plant micro-reserves allow a close The Valencia region has a great diver- Many of these plants and habitats
monitoring of target species by sity of plant species. Twelve of its 355 are threatened by urban development
trained staff and the development of endemic plant species are included and changes in land use, particularly
conservation actions tailored to their in Annexes II and IV of the Habitats on Valencia’s coastal fringe and in its
needs across a whole territory. Since Directive; and 150 species are consid- wetlands.
a PMR can be proclaimed for a single ered rare or threatened. Much of this
target species, it can pinpoint isolated Valencia was therefore an ideal
areas of high botanical value. The aim location for Europe’s first network
is to provide a small-scale and flexible A PMR in Muntanya Cavall, Valencia of PMRs, a project included in the
approach to plant conservation and to UNESCO-MAB Programme in 1991
Photo: E.Laguna
from 1994-96 and the second phase Chaenorhinum tenellum, Petrocoptis bling sites of high botanical interest to
(LIFE95 NAT/E/00856) started in pardoi and Silene diclinis. Conserva- be incorporated into the network that
January 1997, ending in December tion programmes were established for would otherwise remain outside it. Pri-
1999. The aim of the projects was to the genus Biscutella, terrestrial and vate landowners are compensated for
set up a network of some 100 small aquatic cryptograms, the labiate genus transferring management rights to the
botanical reserves (with an average Teucrium (germanders), Satureja (savo- regional authority and are also eligible
size of two hectares) that would be ries), Linaria (toadflax), Chaenorrhinum for grants and subsidies to maintain
representative of the main endemic and Sideritis (ironwort). the PMR.
plant communities found in Valencia.
In addition, a further 1,000 ha of land Species conservation involved both in Two further LIFE-Nature projects
of prime botanical interest would be situ and ex situ measures. The former in Valencia have complemented
purchased for long-term research and included land purchase agreements the network of flora micro-reserves
monitoring in plant ecology. and habitat management plans, the established by the original project.
latter included implementation of a “Conservation of priority habitats in
Exceeding the objectives seed bank, ‘in vitro’ propagation of the Valencian community” (LIFE99
species and cultivation of plants in NAT/E/006417) ran from July 1999
The project surpassed greenhouses.
T S to the end of 2003 with the principal
, ) C
&% expectation, succeed- E objective of conserving the vegetation
Expanding the network
J
total of 158 micro- The Valencia micro-reserve network proposed for inclusion in the Natura
- 2 0 R O
reserves, covering has expanded significantly following 2000 network; “Management and
286 ha. A total of 77 the conclusion of the LIFE project in increasing appreciation of three high
of these PMRs were 1999. As of 2005, it consists of 247 mountain priority habitats in Valen-
0
granted a formal dec- plots, with a total surface area of cia” (LIFE03 NAT/E/0064) ran from
laration of legal protec- % 1,684 ha (the densest network of pro- 2004-2006 with the goal of improv-
J
E &
C T , )
S tion for both the plants tected sites for plant conservation in ing the conservation status of three
and the physical habitat by the world). Some 80% of the micro- priority habitats: endemic black pine
Valencia’s Regional Environment reserves are on public land, with the forests, endemic juniper forests and
Minister. remainder owned by private individu- yew woods.
als, NGOs or municipal authorities. For
The project was also able to draw up the Generalitat Valenciana, these pri- The mountain habitats project aimed
propagation protocols for 20 endan- vate micro-reserves play an important to stop the widespread decline of yew
gered native species and recovery dual role – on the one hand getting and juniper woods through measures
plans were put in place for a number individuals directly involved in plant such as eradicating invasive spe-
of species – Limonium dufourii, conservation, and on the other ena- cies, preserving monumental trees
The PMR projects also involved ex-situ conservation actions – In-vitro reproduction of yew (left), Silene hifacensis seedlings in a
nursery (centre) and Helianthemum caput-felis (right)
Endangered plants in general LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 19
Photo: E.Laguna
of the best yew formations of the
Alicante province were successfully
eradicated. In the Pegunta ravine,
specimens of the non-native pop-
lar Populus nigra x Canadensis were
felled and the trunks turned into
drinking troughs. These troughs were
one of the methods used to attract
potential animal dispersers of seeds
(along with the planting of fruit-bear-
ing plant species and the installation Silene hifacensis: a priority Annex II
plant species included in the Valencian
of ecological beehives) with the aim of
PMR projects
improving the low propagation rate of
the targeted tree species. reserves. The Minorcan government
and regional government (Govern Bal-
Nurseries were established for the ear) are now working on implementing
cultivation of endemic aromatic plants this network of PMRs.
S
and 2,500 examples of each of, six ) & C T
% E
aromatic plant species native to the Slovenia was the first
J
Photo: E.Laguna
- 2 0 RO
0
project habitats were given away free country outside Spain
to visitors and local inhabitants. to go down the
- 2 0 R O
micro-reserve path.
Information panels describing the In the LIFE-Nature
Monitoring of plant species populations
is vital for assessing their conservation flora and habitats on view were added project “Conserva-
0
to eight mountain trails with the aim tion of endangered
status %
J
E
both of promoting knowledge of the species/habitats in the
&
C T
S , )
and encouraging economic activities natural environment and of attracting future Karst Park (Slov-
linked to the natural habitats and their visitors to the area, one of a number enia)” (LIFE02 NAT/SLO/008587)
conservation. of dissemination activities carried out that ran from 2002-5, the Science and
during the project. Research Centre (ZRS) at the Univer-
Some 21,000 seedlings of 23 species sity of Primorska in the port city of
were planted to improve the con- Exporting the concept Koper set up a network of 30 micro-
servation state of the habitats and reserves for rare and endangered wild
encourage their natural regeneration. Planta Europa, the network of inde- plants, as well as for priority habitats
Demographic analysis of yew tree pendent organisations, non-govern- protected by the Habitats Directive,
populations revealed that there are mental and governmental, working mainly focused on small ponds, cal-
6,451 specimens within the five sites together to conserve European wild careous screes, rocky slopes and
where works were carried out during plants and fungi, adopted the initial grasslands. All the sites are within the
the project – a sevenfold LIFE micro-reserves project in Valen- boundaries of the Karst Edge, to be
increase in the number of cia as a pilot scheme to evaluate the included in the future Regional Park
trees compared with previ- possible creation of a pan-European of the Slovenian Karst.
ous data for the whole of micro-reserves network. Steps have
Valencia. now been taken towards establishing Since 2004, LIFE has been support-
such a network. ing the “CRETAPLANT” project (“A
The Botanical Garden of pilot network of plant micro-reserves
the University of Valencia The LIFE project “Conservation of in Western Crete (Greece)” – LIFE04
collected 195 lots of seeds areas with threatened plant species NAT/GR/000104). Developed by the
of the most characteristic in Minorca (Spain)” (LIFE00 NAT/ (Mediterranean Agronomic Institute
plants of high mountain E/007355) ran from 2001-4. In it, the of Chania (MAICh) and the National
habitats for storage in a government of Minorca (Consell Insu- and Kapodistrian University of Athens
germplasm bank. lar) developed a set of comprehensive (NKUA), its aim is to adapt the PMR
actions to recover the plant species concept to the province of Chania in
Photos: E.Laguna
Invasive species such as and priority habitats protected by the Western Crete. As the feature article
Robinia pseudoacacia that Habitats Directive, including the draft- on the following pages shows, results
threatened to colonise one ing of a network of 24 plant micro- have been impressive.
Endangered plants in general
Greece: Conservation
of endangered Cretan flora
On the island of Crete, home to one of the richest floras of all the Mediterranean islands, a LIFE-
funded project has established plant micro-reserves (PMRs) as a conservation measure for
seven rare plant species. Modelled on PMRs in Spain, the success of the project demonstrates
how this methodology can be transferred to other plant-rich Natura 2000 sites in Europe.
in particular, is con-
- 2 0 RO
0
s i d e re d t o h a v e
- 2 0 R O
with an especially
high concentration of %
J
E &
C T , )
S endemic plant species.
The main threats to these
plants stem from human activi- Androcymbium rechingeri: a very rare Cretan endemic flower
ties, such as tourism, farming and
the grazing of farm animals, as well Crete has 14 plant species included in sites that include populations of these
as uncontrolled access to important Annex II of the Habitats Directive, with plant species. Within the framework of
habitats, fires, and habitat modifica- eight of these having priority conser- the LIFE project, the University of Ath-
tion through deforestation, drainage vation status, and the Greek authori- ens, in collaboration with the Mediter-
and climate change. ties have proposed 38 Natura 2000 ranean Agronomic Institute of Chania
Table 1- Priority plant species targeted by the LIFE project in western Crete
(MAICh) and the Region of Crete-For- potential PMR areas and from these it
est Directorate of Chania, proposed was decided to establish seven PMRs,
the establishment of a pilot network of one for each of the target species.
PMRs in western Crete (the prefecture
of Chania) to support the conserva- A detailed inventory and mapping was
tion of seven endemic priority plant carried out for each PMR, including
species found in three of these Natura the location and densities of each spe-
2000 sites. cies. This information was then used
to develop a management plan for each
PMRs for seven endangered PMR. Unlike other LIFE projects con-
species cerned with PMRs, this project did not
foresee the purchase of land: The PMR
The main objective of this LIFE project areas were already in public ownership. Fences protect against grazing, note
was to promote the conservation of “This was very important,” stresses the the difference between the right side
(grazed) and left side (ungrazed)
seven threatened plant species that project manager, Professor Costas
are endemic to the island of Crete (see Thanos, “as the owner of the land is the
table 1). As the distribution range of the State (represented by the Chania For- Along with these actions, long term
targeted species was so narrow, the estry Service, which was also a project monitoring plans were prepared for
PMR was considered to be the most partner).” This fact simplified both the each species in order to determine the
appropriate conservation and man- bureaucratic processes of acquiring factors that affect their conservation.
agement tool. This approach was first permits and the implementation of the Some of the parameters monitored
tested in 1994, in Valencia, Spain, and subsequent actions. included: climate conditions; soil
had already been successfully applied characteristics; interaction with other
in other LIFE projects (see pp. 17-19). All the PMRs were delimited and plants; the presence of animals; and
The project proposed establishing a marked with signs and posts to dis- human activities. The project estab-
network of PMRs in small land parcels courage trespassing and to raise lished permanent monitoring plots,
(less than 20 ha), as defined by the awareness of the presence of the with meteorological and environmen-
original methodology. threatened species. The B. kakiska- tal sensors (with dataloggers) and, in
lae and C. cucullata PMRs were also collaboration with the Chania Forestry
This network of small protected areas fenced off in order to avoid damage Service, also hired a warden to guard
constitutes a management tool that from grazing. A vehicle barrier was each PMR.
complements the management plans erected at the P. theophrasti PMR,
for larger areas, such as those for Nat- since the area was being used to park To complement the in-situ actions,
ura 2000 sites, which require conserva- vehicles. the project also implemented
tion actions and strategies at a wider
landscape level. A lobster pot protects the highly endangered C. cucullata
against grazing
This was the first experience of PMRs
in Greece, but it was also recognised
that, if successful, it could be more
widely applied in other parts of Crete
or the Greek mainland.
and seedling plantations were estab- Hypericum aciferum Fournoti (6.5 ha)
lished in the MAICh botanical gar- Nepeta sphaciotica Svourichti summit at Lefka Ori mountain (4.8 ha)*
den, in the Alpine Botanical Garden Phoenix theophrasti Chrisoskalitissa (2.2 ha)
at Omalos (mountains of Lefka Ori) * The only known worldwide populations
and in the Information Centre of the
Forest Directorate of Chania. These ers, leaflets and t-shirts) targeting the blocks vehicle access to the PMR
ex-situ conservation measures acted general public, in particular children, and reduces the risk of fire.
as a backup, as the seeds and plants and local authorities. The campaign
could be used in future to restore or focused on the PMRs, highlighting Life after LIFE
reinforce the natural populations of their importance in conserving the
the target species. flora of Crete. Key actions included Since the completion of the LIFE
the LIFE-funded Visitor Centre at the project, the beneficiary and partners
The project also developed an infor- Botanical Garden of MAICh and the have continued to monitor and survey
mation campaign (local events, post- Alpine Botanical Garden created at the PMRs. The increased knowledge of
Omalos. the ecology of the target species, com-
Bupleurum kakiskalae bined with the ex-situ actions allows
Observed population growth for a better and quicker response to
the different threats. The definition of
Although, the conservation proce- a legal status and the implementation
dures implemented by the project of the management plans by the Cha-
were based on ‘mild’ actions (fenc- nia Forestry Service (Region of Crete)
ing, wardening, installing signs and will also guarantee the conservation of
boards) and did not involve heavy these species in the future.
restoration measures, the project
achieved good results in terms of In summary, LIFE funding was crucial
guaranteeing the long term conser- for the conservation of seven unique
vation of the target species. Along and rare plant species on the verge of
with the implementation of manage- extinction. Without the support of LIFE,
ment plans and continuous moni- the application of a new plant conser-
toring of the plant populations, the vation methodology – PMRs – would
project defined the legal status of not have been tested or transferred
PMRs in Greek law, along with the as an effective conservation tool in
Natura 2000 sites. The proclamation Europe.
of the PMRs as “wildlife refuges” is
currently being approved by the
Regional authority of Crete. Project Number:
LIFE04 NAT/GR/000104
Two species: B. kakiskalae and C. Title: A pilot network of plant micro-
cucullata, which were particularly reserves in western Crete
threatened by grazing, benefited sig- Beneficiary: National and Kapodis-
nificantly from the fencing actions. In trian University of Athens
2006, the entire population amounted Contact: Prof. Costas Thanos
to 69 B. kakiskalae individuals while Email: cthanos@biol.uoa.gr
in 2007, within the fenced area, Website:
an additional 100 seedlings were http://cretaplant.biol.uoa.gr
recorded. In relation to P. theophrasti, Period: Sep-2004 to Dec-2007
the population increased from 49 to
Total Budget: e 932,000
55 individuals thanks to the planting
of offshoots and the barrier that now LIFE Contribution: e 699,000
LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 23
The Mediterranean region is home to more than 24,000 vascular plant species and
includes approximately 10% of all known plant species on Earth. More than half the
plant species are endemic and 80% of all European plant endemics are found in the
Mediterranean. The region is nearly as rich in endemics as tropical Africa, even though
However, this plant biodiversity is threatened by the rapid urbanisation of coastal zones
for tourism, increasing conflicts over the use of land, the growing risk of desertifica-
tion, water scarcity and forest fires. Furthermore, climate change is already affecting
LIFE has been funding projects that aim to improve the conservation status of the
region’s unique habitats and plant species, which are considered a priority for con-
Cyprus: conservation of
unique flora and habitats
The first LIFE Nature project to be undertaken in Cyprus aimed to conserve unique habitats and
plant species in Europe while promoting the implementation of the Natura 2000 network.
Table 1- Description of the main Natura 2000 sites targeted with project actions
Troodos National Forest Park This SCI, considered the most important area for biodiversity in Cyprus, contains a variety of habitat types (11
Annex I habitats) including four priority and endangered habitats (Pinus nigra ssp. pallasiana, Quercus alnifolia,
and serpentinophilus and peat grasslands). It hosts 10 Annex II species (three of them plant priority species:
Arabis kennedyae, Chionodoxa lochiae and Pinguicula crystallina) and another 262 relevant plant and animal
species, including a large number of endemic plants and the priority snake Columber cypriensis.
Kavo (cape) Gkreko This SCI presents 11 Annex I habitats, including the priority Zizyphus lotus mattorals, vernal pools, and the
marine Posidonia beds. It hosts 400 plant species, 15 of them endemics and 71 fauna species, including the
dolphins Tursiops truncatus and Stenella coeruleoalba.
Vouni Panagias The site includes eight Annex I habitat types (including the Quercus infectoria woodland) and two plant species
listed in Annex II (including the priority Scilla morrissi). The site also hosts one of the known populations of the
endemic snake Coluber cypriensis (Annex II priority species).
Mediterranean flora LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 25
A Sicilian fir tree (one of 30 remaining adult individuals of Abies nebrodensis) in the Madonie Regional Park
The high rocky peaks of the Madonie ered in 1957, but confined only to a ever soil degradation of its natural
mountains were once covered by the small area, just a few kilometres from habitat has made re-introduction dif-
Sicilian fir, an endemic conifer, which Polizzi Generosa. Because of its rar- ficult. Other major threats to the spe-
grows at around 1,500 metres on ity, this relic species is included as a cies include the poor health of speci-
limestone soil. The wood of the spe- priority species in Annex II of the EU mens propagated in tree nurseries,
cies can be seen used in the doors Habitats Directive. the limited population size, and the
and the roof-beams of local churches. danger of forest fire. Additional threats
By 1900 however, the species was Once rediscovered, foresters immedi- include hybridisation with non-native
considered extinct, due to extensive ately initiated conservation measures firs resulting in genetic contamination,
logging and erosion. It was rediscov- to help preserve the Sicilian fir. How- and global warming.
Mediterranean flora
The Sierra Nevada National Park screes, stony wastes, meadows and
around Granada in southern Spain pine and oak woods.
contains 7% of all Mediterranean flora,
boasting over 2,100 plant species, The project evaluated the plants’ con-
including more than 80 unique to the servation status, established manage-
region. The particularity of this undulat- ment plans for each site and imple-
ing, mountainous terrain provides an mented restoration and conservation
amazing diversity of habitats that have measures. The six target localities
enabled this wealth of biodiversity. were included within the National Park
of Sierra Nevada, thereby enjoying a Saxifraga nevadensis
Most of these endangered habitats high protection status. A high altitude
and species are protected by the (1,900 m) Botanical Garden was also by 2002; and the 600 re-introduced
Habitats Directive. The Sierra Nevada created, holding specimens of all Senecio elodes showed survival rates
is a designated pSCI (proposed Site of regional flora. Interestingly, this idea of more than 80%.
Community Interest) within the Natura was replicated by another Mediter-
2000 network. Nevertheless, factors ranean LIFE-Nature project (LIFE04 Significantly, the project established,
such as overgrazing (by wildlife and NAT/GR/000104) featured in this pub- through the management plans, a
domestic cattle), unsustainable for- lication (see pp. 20-22). framework for the long-term protection
estry activities, forest fires, illegal har- of biodiversity in the targeted sites.
vesting and leisure activities are neg- Seeds and other vegetative material
atively affecting the Sierra’s diverse from 203 threatened species were The project increased knowledge and
flora. Now, 115 species, including 35 collected and stored in germplasm awareness about flora conservation
that are endemic to the region, are banks; propagation protocols were among the general public and relevant
threatened with extinction. obtained for 56 of them. Seedling professionals. Notably, it generated
trials were conducted on site to rein- successful co-operation with local
What did LIFE do? force or reintroduce the populations in farmers and LEADER programmes
targeted areas. around the cultivation programme
The four-year “Sierra Nevada” project, for Artemisia granatensis, a species
led by the Andalusian Environment The project ran an information cam- threatened by over-collection because
Ministry, worked to safeguard the paign to improve awareness of the of its alleged health properties.
habitats of 11 endangered plants threatened species and habitats.
included in Annex II of the Habitats
Directive: Narcisus nevadensis; Are- What was the outcome? Project Number:
naria nevadensis; Artemisia granaten- LIFE98 NAT/E/005358
sis; Centaurea gadorensis; Erigeron The project successfully propagated Title: Recovery of areas of threat-
frigidus; Senecio elodes; Senecio most of the plant species targeted for ened flora in Sierra Nevada
nevadensis; Erodium astragaloides; re-introduction to their natural habitat. Beneficiary: Consejería de Medio
Erodium rupicola; Odontites granat- The situation of each of the 11 tar- Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucía
ensis; and Laserpitium longiradium. geted species considerably improved Contact: Rafael Silva Lopez
The project covered six sites in Sierra during the project and progress Email: pn.sierranevada@cma.caan.es
Nevada encompassing high-lying was made towards reducing their
Period: Jan-1999 to Dec-2002
endangered status. For example, the
Mulhacén-Alcazaba, Poqueira river, Odontites granatensis increased from Total Budget: e 835,000
Monachil river woodlands, Collado de las LIFE Contribution: e 501,000
440 samples in 1995 to over 100,000
Sabinas, Alayos de Dílar and Trevenque
LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 31
Within the EU, the Macaronesian region consists of three volcanic archipelagos: the
Azores, Madeira (both Portugal) and the Canaries (Spain). The contrasting landscape
and mild climate have created an ideal environment for a particularly rich flora and
habitats, many of which are endemic. Although representing less than 0.3% of EU
territory, the Macaronesian region contains 207 SCIs and hosts around 19% of the
habitat types in Annex I of the Habitats Directive and 28% of the plants in Annex II.
LIFE has been funding a number of projects for these particular habitats and species
The project’s germination trials and ronment and has already been used
propagation studies also achieved by competent authorities. The ben-
very satisfactory results for three spe- eficiary has advised other institutions
cies. While valid protocols were not involved in conservation projects such
obtained for Sambucus palmesis or as university departments, Natural
Myrica rivas-martinezii, protocols for and National Parks and other islands
vegetative reproduction are available administrations. It has also proposed
that will allow existing genetic fea- that the target species, which are
tures to be preserved. Genetics stud- already listed in regional and interna-
ies were successful for all species tional lists of endangered species, be
Laurissilva (laurel forest) is con- rea, supports flora and fauna of Rats not only live on food resources
sidered primeval forest and dates outstanding value, including several from the forest (plants, shoots, ber-
back to the Tertiary period when it species endemic to Macaronesia ries and seeds) but also prey heav-
covered vast expanses of southern and Madeira, such as the Madeira ily on birds, the main vehicle for
Europe and North Africa. The ice laurel pigeon, Columba trocaz. spreading seeds and consequently
ages brought about a drastic reduc- one of the natural mechanisms of
tion in the area of distribution, now The area of forest has shrunk progres- forest regeneration.
confined to the islands in the biogeo- sively since the discovery of the archi-
graphical region of Macaronesia and pelago. To reverse this trend, the main In the late 1990s, the invading exotic
certain pockets in southern Morocco pockets of laurel forest are now pro- plant Kahili ginger (Hedychium gard-
and on the coast of West Africa. tected as part of the Madeira nature nerianum) went through a phase of
reserve and a proposed Natura 2000 rapid colonisation of new and exten-
Nowadays the most extensive and site (pSCI Laurissilva da Madeira). sive areas along the lower border of
best preserved expanse of laurel for- the forest, endangering its regenera-
est is found on the island of Madeira. Yet despite being a priority habitat tion and expansion. These points of
Found at an altitude of 300 to 1,300 according to the Habitats Directive, degradation also hindered the native
m, the laurel forest grows in parts of serious dangers still threaten the for- fauna.
the island where thick fogs are fre- est’s existence. One set of threats
quent and rainfall and humidity are comes from human activities, includ-
high (minimum of 1,700 mm/year ing land conversion for agriculture, Laurissilva forest on the north slopes
and average 85%, respectively). illegal wood extraction and intensive of Madeira island
This biotope, frequently dominated grazing by livestock (as well as forest
by Laurus azorica and Clethra arbo- fires). A second set of threats includes
the spread of non native fauna (rats)
and invasive alien plants.
Macaronesian flora LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 35
What did LIFE do? Partly running in parallel with this forest and from key areas outside
project, the LIFE project “Measures it. However, the aim of total eradi-
Between 1994 and 2003, LIFE sup- for the management and conserva- cation from a “sanitary belt” around
ported five separate projects for the tion of the laurel forest of Madeira” the forest was not achieved, nor
conservation and restoration of areas (LIFE97 NAT/P/004082 – February was the whole set of exotics tack-
of Madeira’s native laurel forest, and 1998 to January 2000) aimed to led. However, three jobs were cre-
its flora and fauna . As part of the eradicate the main invading plant ated as a consequence of LIFE and
initial project (“Urgent measures for species and assess the extent of a permanent exotics fighting team
the conservation and recovery of damage caused by rats. (supported by national funds) is now
species and habitats of important at work on this task, helped by the
community interest of the Madeira This project partly achieved its Portuguese army. The assessment
Archipelago” – LIFE94/P/A222/ objectives: the most invasive of the of damages caused by rats was not
P/01052/MAD) 350 ha of excellent exotics, Hedychium gardnerianum, concluded and only preliminary con-
quality laurel forest was purchased was removed both from the laurel clusions were drawn.
with a view to implementing man-
Photo: R.Jardim, JB Madeira
Other flora in the forest The project successfully established The Funduras project
a germplasm bank containing seed
The laurel forest is also home to other and vegetative material of the eight The fifth LIFE Nature project ran from
rare flora. The LIFE project “Conserva- priority species, thereby helping to January 2000 to December 2003. The
tion of priority and rare plant species conserve genetic variability. aims of “Restoration of the laurel forest
of Madeira” (LIFE99 NAT/P/006431 in Funduras” (LIFE99 NAT/P/006436)
– October 1999 to September 2003) Two species, Jasminum azoricum included protecting the local ecosys-
set out to save eight priority rare and and Cheirolophus massonianus, tem against the collection of species
endemic species from extinction. were successfully reintroduced in and tree cutting, reducing the risk of
These species were: the wild, while a third, Aichryson forest fires, and disseminating the
• Aichryson dumosum domusum, was found to be present native biological heritage and raising
• Andryala crithmifolia in such numbers that reintroduction awareness about the importance of its
• Chamaemeles coriacea was deemed unnecessary. It was conservation.
• Cheirolophus massonianus however reproduced in the Botani-
• Madeira morning glory (Convolvu- cal Garden of Madeira for research As a result of an agreement with the
lus massonii) purposes. local rangers that survey the area,
• Geranium maderense together with a technician hired by
• Azores jasmine (Jasminum azori- The project also succeeded in partially the project and integrated into the
cum) restoring the habitat in Pico Branco regional forestry department, spe-
• Pittosporum coriaceum. that houses many of the species. cies collection has been successfully
avoided.
Aichryson dumosum: found only on a cliff on the south slope of Madeira island
This LIFE project has also increased
the local population’s knowledge of
the importance of the area of lau-
rel forest and two INTERREG III-B
projects have since taken place with
the aims of promoting walking tourism
and describing in detail the Funduras
area within the Natura 2000 network.
Restoration
Restoration of of habitats
habitats
Many endangered plant species are narrow-range endemic species with special habi-
tat requirements. Their conservation status is highly dependent on the status of the
habitat. Thus, the restoration and management of their habitats is crucial for their sur-
vival. Some LIFE projects have been restoring endangered plant species habitats, and
at the same time promoting conservation actions on- and off-site in order to guarantee
The Lake Constance forget-me-not sheen. Unfortunately, this specta- What did LIFE do?
(Myosotis rehsteineri) as the name sug- cular sight has become increasingly
gests, is found in the Lake Constance rare. One reason for the species’ The main objective of the LIFE-
region, which straddles Austria, Ger- decline in Bregenz is that up until the Nature project was to restore 2,600
many and Switzerland. Here, in the 1990s, large amounts of gravel were metres of eroding lakeshore near the
lake’s natural flood plain, it thrives extracted from the lake for building city of Bregenz in Austria, to help the
on the gravel banks built up during projects. Over time, the broad gra- survival of Myosotis rehsteineri, as
the postglacial period, from pebbles vel banks that used to gently slope well as to preserve other important
washed down by the Alpine rivers. down into the lakes gradually disap- habitats and species found in the
peared and were replaced by unsta- erosion zone. At the same time, the
In early spring when the Lake ble, steep slopes where the motion gravel deposited under water would
Constance forget-me-not blooms of the waves rolls the gravel to and serve as spawning ground for fish.
– and when lake water levels are at fro unimpeded – leaving little chance
their lowest – strips of the shoreline for the delicate gravel bank flora to The project was run by Amt der Lan-
used to be carpeted with a light blue take hold. deshauptstadt Bregenz, the depart-
Restoration of habitats LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 39
The Benningen Marsh, located the core zone that he would do nature
between the towns of Benningen and restoration works on his property.
Memmingen in Bavaria, Southern
Germany, is a 22 ha calcareous fen The project removed succession over-
and petrifying springs complex with growth and non-indigenous trees, in
expanses of water where ground- particular conifers, to reduce water loss
water reaches the surface. The site, through evapo-transpiration. Scattered
a priority habitat for conservation plots of black sedge were scooped out
included in Annex 1 of the Habitats to create mosaics of open patches into
directive, contains rare plants such which tufa mosses and Armeria could
as Armeria maritime ssp. purpurea, spread. To further help the spread of
a magenta-coloured wildflower found Armeria, the project team cut openings
only in this location, and the creeping in tree belts to let pollinating insects
marshwort (Apium repens). However, enter the core zone. Armeria maritime subsp. purpurea on
over decades, pressure from hous- calcareous fens
ing and agriculture had changed the Public relations work was carried out to
quality and percolation volume of raise awareness amongst the local com- European tree frogs (Hyla arborea)
the groundwater in the area. Open munity and visitors of the value of this benefited from restoration work
springs had become overgrown with forgotten site. This included publishing around their breeding ponds.
trees and shrubs. Tufts of black sedge brochures and reports and establishing
(Schoenus nigricans) formed a thick a visitor observation point. The data collected during and in
choking mat around the Armeria and parallel with the LIFE project greatly
tufa mosses (Cratoneurion).There was What was the outcome? increased knowledge of the site. Many
practically no active management of rare invertebrate species were found,
the site and the local population was The LIFE project has led to a major such as Neumania verrucosa. The
largely unaware of the rare habitats improvement to the site’s conservation project has also massively raised the
and species on its doorstep. status.The hydrological project works profile of the pSCI and its rare species
(boulder dams, groynes and a reduc- amongst the local public.
What did LIFE do? tion in the frequency of ditch cleaning)
brought about a 10-20 cm increase in
Project Number:
In 1996, the LIFE-Nature “Benningen” the water level and increased calcium
LIFE96 NAT/D/000304
project was set up to preserve and carbonate precipitation, both prereq-
Title: Protection and development of
improve the core zone as an ecologi- uisites for the expansion of the tufa
Benningen Marsh (Benninger Ried)
cally valuable calcareous fen, while mosses and Armeria. In the patches
Beneficiary: Bayerisches
creating a buffer zone of humid mead- where the black sedge was removed,
Staatsministerium für Umwelt,
ows around it by rehumidification. new growth of Cratoneurion and Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz,
Armeria was observed. Other spe- Bavaria, Germany
A detailed hydrogeological survey was cies besides Armeria were found to Contact: Harald Lippert
used to determine the exact hydro- have increased in number, including
Email:
logical measures that needed to be the plant Bartsia alpina, the narrow- harald.lippert@stmugv.bayern.de
taken. The beneficiary and partners mouthed whorl snail (Vertigo angus-
Website:
purchased or leased 38 ha of land, tior) and hygrophile grasshoppers. www.LIFE-natur.de (with video)
and an agreement was struck with
Period:
the owner of a further 11 ha of land in The blue-tailed damselfly (Ischnura Jan-1996 to Aug-2003
pumilio) returned to the site in 2003
Total Budget: e 386,000
after a 10-year absence. Both the
This species is not included in the Habi- LIFE Contribution: e 227,000
tats directive dragonflies and the population of
Restoration of habitats
The 6,415-ha Pietrosul biosphere Among the habitats of Community 40 over-aged trees remaining, the
reserve, now also a proposed Natura interest in the reserve, forests are the species population has now become
2000 site, hosts a number of habitats most seriously degraded, surviving almost extinct locally.
and species of Community interest, in some cases only ������������������
in ���������������
small patches.
some of which have become dam- Some tree species, such as the cem- In Romania, the cembra pine grows,
aged by human activities. The main bra pine (Pinus cembra) and mugo together with mugo pine and spruce,
threats include tourism (e.g. skiing, pine (Pinus mugo) only survive at 1% at high altitudes (1,600-2,000 metres).
hiking, mountaineering), selective and 21% respectively, of their former It also occurs in the Polish, Ukrainian
logging, livestock-grazing and dis- area. In the past, a large population and Slovak Carpathians, as well as
turbance from hunting, for example of cembra pine was present in the the Austrian, Swiss, French and Italian
of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). targeted area, but with only around Alps. The species’ habitat, which has a
Pinus mugo and Pinus cembra habitat in Pietrosul Rodnei, Oriental Carpathians
Project Number:
LIFE03 NAT/RO/000027
Title: Restoration forest habitats
from Pietrosul Rodnei Biosphere
Reserve
Beneficiary:
ICAS-Forest Research and
Management Institute
Contact: Ioan Blada
Email:
icas@icas.ro
Website:
http://www.icassv.ro/life_pietrosu/
Period:
Jun-2003 to Jun-2007
Total Budget: e 213,000
LIFE Contribution: e 107,000
Restoration of habitats LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 45
Hády Hill, rising to 423 metres above What did LIFE do?
sea level, dominates the landscape to
the northeast of Brno, the second larg- The project was managed by the
est city in the Czech Republic. The site project beneficiary, Land Trust Hády,
is situated in the southernmost part of a local nature conservation organisa-
the Moravian Karst, a limestone area tion. Its main objective was the resto-
Credit: KingsbraeGarden
of caves and small underground rivers, ration and sustainable management of
which is one of the most beautiful and some 150 ha of the Hády’s natural and
most visited areas in the country. The semi-natural vegetation, a haven for
presence of lime and the flow of the some very rare thermophilous plants
Svratka river, which cuts a deep valley, and habitats. This was achieved by
have contributed to creating the ideal a series of interrelated actions. For Pulsatilla grandis: a species targeted by
conditions for a high concentration example, in order to safeguard the the project
of thermophilous plant species and most endangered flora and fauna, the
habitats. Several of these are included beneficiary purchased 5 ha of land planting seedlings of oak, lime tree,
in the Habitats Directive: Echium rus- close to the Hády quarry. Abandoned sycamore and common maple. Tradi-
sicum and Pulsatilla grandis (Annex II) pastures with sub-pannonic steppic tional grazing was also successfully re-
and Cypripedium calceolus (Annex V), grasslands were restored and tradi- established to maintain the grasslands
sub-pannonic steppic grasslands, pan- tional sheep grazing re-established. and woodlands. On a small (2 ha) area,
nonian white oak woods, pannonian Restoration actions included the Norway spruce trees were removed in
oak hornbeam forests, lime alder for- removal of invasive tree species and order to restore the lime alder forests
ests of slopes, screes and ravines and scrub vegetation and the introduction of slopes, screes and ravines and cal-
calcareous scree (all of which are listed of appropriate grazing management. careous screes of hill and montane lev-
in Annex I). Several developments were els in lower parts of the valley.
threatening the unique biodiversity of What was the outcome?
this area. A move away from traditional
Project Number:
agriculture and grazing methods had The project was successful and its
LIFE04 NAT/CZ/000015
led to overgrowth on pastures and the achievements have gone beyond what
Title: Restoration of thermophilous
invasion of alien species such as black was expected at the outset – i.e. some
habitats in the Moravian Karst
locust (Robinia pseudacacia), common 12 ha of land in and around the Hády
Beneficiary: Land Trust Hády (Local
ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and Norway quarry was bought from the mining
Chapter of the Czech Union for
spruce (Picea abies). Furthermore, the company, Českomoravský Cement. Nature Conservation)
priority habitats and species were being The two Annex II priority plant species
Contact: Václav Izák
endangered by the existence of lime- Echium russicum and Pulsatilla gran-
Email:
stone quarries that gradually destroyed dis now grow on this land. To favour
a.stoker@natuurmonumenten.nl
the unique steppe grasslands. Follow- the expansion of the dry grassland
Website:
ing the closure of the quarry at Hády habitats and white oak forests, inva-
http://psh.ecn.cz/index2.htm
in 1998, the area was abandoned and sive species (in particular black locust
Period:
had become overgrown. and common ash) were eliminated
Oct-2004 to Dec-2007
over 56 ha ( the original proposal was
Total Budget: e 550,000
for 25 ha). The natural succession of
Plant species that thrive in a warm envi-
ronment the vegetation was encouraged by LIFE Contribution: e 412,000
Further projects focusing
on endangered plants
The table below provides further examples of LIFE projects focusing on endangered plants.
For more information on individual projects, visit the online database at:
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm. The database provides useful, detailed
search fields – for example under “species” users may search plant and mosses species under
“Pteridophyta”, “Lower plants”, “Gymnospermae” and ”Angiospermae”
* Priority species for conservation
¤
Annex I habitat
LIFE Focus I LIFE and Europe’s endangered plants I p. 49
A number of LIFE publications are LIFE, Natura 2000 and the military Best LIFE-Environment Projects 2006-2007
available on the LIFE website: (2005 - 86 pp. – ISBN 92-894-9213-9 (2007, 44 pp.-ISBN 978-92-79-06699-3
– ISSN 1725-5619) ISSN 1725-5619)
LIFE and Europe’s wetlands: Restoring http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
a vital ecosystem (2007 - 68 pp. - ISBN publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ publications/lifepublications/bestprojects
978-92-79-07617-6) documents/military_en.pdf documents/bestenv07.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ LIFE for birds: 25 years of the Birds LIFE-Third Countries 1992-2006 (2007,
documents/wetlands.pdf Directive: the contribution of LIFE- 64 pp. – ISBN 978-92-79-05694-9 – ISSN
Nature projects (2004 - 48 pp. – ISBN 1725-5619)
LIFE and waste recycling: Innovative 92-894-7452-1 – ISSN 1725-5619) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
waste management options in Europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/
(2007 - 60 pp. - ISBN 978-92-79-07397-7) publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ documents/TCY_lr.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ documents/birds_en.pdf
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ Best LIFE-Environment Projects 2005-
documents/recycling.pdf The air we breathe: LIFE and the Euro- 2006 (2006, 40 pp. ISBN 92-79-02123-0)
pean Union clean air policy (2004 - 32 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
LIFE and Europe’s rivers: Protecting – ISBN 92-894-7899-3 – ISSN 1725-5619) publications/lifepublications/bestprojects/
and improving our water resources http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ documents/bestenv06_lr.pdf
(2007 – 52pp. ISBN 978-92-79-05543-0 publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/
- ISSN 1725-5619) documents/lifeair_hr.pdf LIFE-Environment 1992-2004 “Dem-
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ onstrating excellence in environmen-
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ LIFE-Nature: communicating with tal innovation” (2005, 124 pp. – ISBN
documents/rivers.pdf stakeholders and the general public 92-894-7699-3 – ISSN 1725-5619)
– Best practice examples for Natura http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
LIFE and Energy: Innovative solutions 2000 (2004 - 72 pp. – ISBN 92-894- publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/
for sustainable and efficient energy in 7898-5 – ISSN 1725-5619) documents/lifeenv92_04.pdf
Europe (2007 – 64pp. ISBN 978 92-79- http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
04969-9 - ISSN 1725-5619) publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ LIFE-Environment Projects 2006 compi-
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ documents/natcommunicat_lr.pdf lation (2006, 56 pp.-ISBN 92-79-02786-7)
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ http://ec.europa.eu/environment/
documents/energy_lr.pdf A cleaner, greener Europe: LIFE and life/publications/lifepublications/
the European Union waste policy compilations/documents/envcompila-
LIFE and the marine environment (2004 - 28 pp. – ISBN 92-894-6018-0 tion06.pdf
(2006 – 54pp. ISBN 92-79-03447-2- ISSN – ISSN 1725-5619)
1725-5619) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ LIFE-Nature Projects 2006 compilation
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ (2006, 67 pp. – ISBN 92-79-02788-3)
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ documents/waste_en.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
documents/marine_lr.pdf publications/lifepublications/compila-
Industrial pollution, European solu- tions/documents/natcompilation06.pdf
LIFE and European forests (2006 - 68pp. tions: clean technologies – LIFE and
ISBN 92-79-02255-5 - ISSN 1725-5619) the Directive on integrated pollution LIFE-Third Countries Projects 2006
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ prevention and control (IPPC Direc- compilation (2006, 20 pp. – ISBN 92-
publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ tive) (2003 - 32 pp. – ISBN 92-894- 79-02787-5)
documents/forest_lr.pdf 6020-2 – ISSN 1725-5619) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ life/publications/lifepublications/
LIFE in the City: Innovative solutions publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ compilations/documents/tcycompila-
for Europe’s urban environment (2006, documents/cleantech_en.pdf tion06.pdf
64pp. - ISBN 92-79-02254-7 – ISSN
1725-5619) http://ec.europa.eu/envi- LIFE and agri-environment support-
ronment/life/publications/lifepublica- ing Natura 2000: Experience from the
tions/lifefocus/documents/urban_lr.pdf LIFE programme (2003 - 72 pp. – ISBN
92-894-6023-7 – ISSN N° 1725-5619) A number of printed copies of cer-
Integrated management of Natura http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/ tain LIFE publications are availa-
2000 sites (2005 - 48 pp. – ISBN 92-79- publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/ ble and can be ordered free-of-
00388-7) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ documents/agrienvironment_en.pdf
charge at: http://ec.europa.eu/
life/publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/
environment/life/publications/
documents/managingnatura_lr.pdf
order.htm
LIFE “L’Instrument Financier pour l’Environnement” / The financial instrument for the environment
Period covered (LIFE III) 2000-2006.
EU funding available approximately EUR 945 million.
Type of intervention co-financing actions in favour of the environment (LIFE projects) in the Member States of
the European Union, in associated candidate countries and in certain third countries bordering the Mediterranean and
the Baltic Sea.
LIFE projects
> LIFE Nature projects improve the conservation status of endangered species and natural habitats. They support the
implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives and the Natura 2000 network.
> LIFE Environment projects contribute to the development of innovative and integrated techniques or methods to
support environmental progress.
> LIFE Third Countries projects support environmental capacity building and initiatives in non-EU countries bordering
the Mediterranean and the Baltic Sea.
LIFE+
KH-80-08-284-EN-C
“L’Instrument Financier pour l’Environnement” / The financial instrument for the environment
LIFE+ projects
> LIFE Nature projects improve the conservation status of endangered species and natural habitats. They support the
implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives and the Natura 2000 network.
> LIFE+ Biodiversity projects improve biodiversity in the EU. They contribute to the implementation of the objectives of
the Commission Communication, “Halting the loss of Biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond” (COM (2006) 216 final).
> LIFE+ Environment Policy and Governance projects contribute to the development and demonstration of innovative
policy approaches, technologies, methods and instruments in support of European environmental policy and legislation.
> LIFE+ Information and Communication projects are communication and awareness raising campaigns related to the
implementation, updating and development of European environmental policy and legislation, including the prevention
of forest fires and training for forest fire agents.
How to apply for LIFE+ funding The European Commission organises annual calls for proposals. Full details are
available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/funding/lifeplus.htm
Contact
European Commission – Directorate-General for the Environment
LIFE Unit – BU-9 02/1 – B-1049 Brussels – Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/life
LIFE Focus / LIFE and endangered plants: Conserving Europe’s threatened flora
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
ISSN 1725-5619
����������