Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 9
Statistical Inference:
Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
The main objective of Chapter 9 is to help you to learn how to test hypotheses on single
populations, thereby enabling you to:
1. Understand the logic of hypothesis testing and know how to establish null and
alternate hypotheses.
2. Understand Type I and Type II errors and know how to solve for Type II errors.
For some instructors, this chapter is the cornerstone of the first statistics course.
Hypothesis testing presents the logic in which ideas, theories, etc., are scientifically
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 2
examined. The student can be made aware that much of the development of concepts to
this point including sampling, level of data measurement, descriptive tools such as mean
and standard deviation, probability, and distributions pave the way for testing hypotheses.
Often students (and instructors) will say "Why do we need to test this hypothesis when
we can make a decision by examining the data?" Sometimes it is true that examining the
data could allow hypothesis decisions to be made. However, by using the methodology
and structure of hypothesis testing even in "obvious" situations, the researcher has added
credibility and rigor to his/her findings. Some statisticians actually report findings in a
court of law as an expert witness. Others report their findings in a journal, to the public,
to the corporate board, to a client, or to their manager. In each case, by using the
hypothesis testing method rather than a "seat of the pants" judgment, the researcher
stands on a much firmer foundation by using the principles of hypothesis testing and
random sampling. Chapter 9 brings together many of the tools developed to this point
and formalizes a procedure for testing hypotheses.
The statistical hypotheses are set up as to contain all possible decisions. The
two-tailed test always has = and ≠ in the null and alternative hypothesis. One-tailed
tests are presented with = in the null hypothesis and either > or < in the alternative
hypothesis. If in doubt, the researcher should use a two-tailed test. Chapter 9 begins
with a two-tailed test example. Usually, that which the researcher wants to demonstrate
true or prove true is usually set up as an alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is
that the new theory or idea is not true, the status quo is still true, or that there is no
difference. The null hypothesis is assumed to be true before the process begins. Some
researchers liken this procedure to a court of law where the defendant is presumed
innocent (assume null is true - nothing has happened). Evidence is brought before the
judge or jury. If enough evidence is presented, the null hypothesis (defendant innocent)
can no longer be accepted or assume true. The null hypothesis is rejected as not true and
the alternate hypothesis is accepted as true by default. Emphasize that the researcher
needs to make a decision after examining the observed statistic.
Some of the key concepts in this chapter are one-tailed and two-tailed test and
Type I and Type II error. In order for a one-tailed test to be conducted, the problem must
include some suggestion of a direction to be tested. If the student sees such words as
greater, less than, more than, higher, younger, etc., then he/she knows to use a one-tail
test. If no direction is given (test to determine if there is a "difference"), then a two-tailed
test is called for. Ultimately, students will see that the only effect of using a one-tailed
test versus a two-tailed test is on the critical table value. A one-tailed test uses all of the
value of alpha in one tail. A two-tailed test splits alpha and uses alpha/2 in each tail thus
creating a critical value that is further out in the distribution. The result is that (all things
being the same) it is more difficult to reject the null hypothesis with a two-tailed test.
Many computer packages such as MINITAB include in the results a p-value. If you
designate that the hypothesis test is a two-tailed test, the computer will double the p-value
so that it can be compared directly to alpha.
In discussing Type I and Type II errors, there are a few things to consider. Once
a decision is made regarding the null hypothesis, there is a possibility that the decision is
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 3
correct or that an error has been made. Since the researcher virtually never knows for
certain whether the null hypothesis was actually true or not, a probability of committing
one of these errors can be computed. Emphasize with the students that a researcher can
never commit a Type I error and a Type II error at the same time. This is so because a
Type I error can only be committed when the null hypothesis is rejected and a Type II
error can only be committed when the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Type I
and Type II errors are important concepts for managerial students to understand even
beyond the realm of statistical hypothesis testing. For example, if a manager decides to
fire or not fire an employee based on some evidence collected, he/she could be
committing a Type I or a Type II error depending on the decision. If the production
manager decides to stop the production line because of evidence of faulty raw materials,
he/she might be committing a Type I error. On the other hand, if the manager fails to
shut the production line down even when faced with evidence of faulty raw materials,
he/she might be committing a Type II error.
The student can be told that there are some widely accepted values for alpha
(probability of committing a Type I error) in the research world and that a value is
usually selected before the research begins. On the other hand, since the value of Beta
(probability of committing a Type II error) varies with every possible alternate value of
the parameter being tested, Beta is usually examined and computed over a range of
possible values of that parameter. As you can see, the concepts of hypothesis testing are
difficult and represent higher levels of learning (logic, transfer, etc.). Student
understanding of these concepts will improve as you work your way through the
techniques in this chapter and in chapter 10.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
KEY TERMS
9.1 a) Ho: µ = 25
Ha: µ ≠ 25
x − µ 28 .1 − 25
=
z= s 8.46 = 2.77
n 57
α
Since the p-value of .0028 is less than = .005, the decision is to:
2
Reject the null hypothesis
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c − 25
± 2.575 = 8.46
57
x c = 25 ± 2.885
x − µ 6.91 − 7.48
=
z = s 1.21 = -4.62
n 96
x − µ 1,215 −1,200
=
z = s 100 = 1.59
n 113
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c −1,200
1.28 = 100
113
x c = 1,200 + 12.04
Since calculated x = 1,215 which is greater than the critical x = 1212.04, reject
the null hypothesis.
9.4 Ho: µ = 82
Ha: µ < 82
z.01 = -2.33
x − µ 78 .125 − 82
=
z= s 9.184 = -2.39
n 32
Statistically, we can conclude that urban air soot is significantly lower. From a
business and community point-of-view, assuming that the sample result is
representative of how the air actually is now, is a reduction of suspended particles
from 82 to 78.125 really an important reduction in air pollution? Certainly it
marks an important first step and perhaps a significant start. Whether or not it
would really make a difference in the quality of life for people in the city of St.
Louis remains to be seen. Most likely, politicians and city chamber of commerce
folks would jump on such results as indications of improvement in city
conditions.
Since the observed z = 1.85 < z.025 = 1.96, the decision is to fail to reject the
null hypothesis.
x − µ 64 ,820 − 62 ,600
=
z = s 7,810 = 1.97
n 48
Since the observed z = 1.97 < z.01 = 2.33, the decision is to fail to reject the
null hypothesis.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 8
0
9.7 H : µ = 5
Ha: µ ≠ 5
x − µ 5.0611 − 5
=
z = s 0.2803 = 1.41
n 42
Since the observed z = 1.41 < z.05 = 1.645, the decision is to fail to reject the
null hypothesis.
x − µ 15 .6 −18 .2
=
z = s 2.3 = -6.39
n 32
x − µ $4,008 − $4,292
=
z = s $386 = -5.46
n 55
The CEO could use this information as a way of discrediting the Runzheimer
study and using her own figures in recruiting people and in discussing relocation
options. In such a case, this could be a substantive finding. However, one must
ask if the difference between $4,292 and $4,008 is really an important difference
in monthly rental expense. Certainly, Paris is expensive either way. However, an
almost $300 difference in monthly rental cost is a non trivial amount for most
people and therefore might be considered substantive.
x = 132.36 s = 27.68
Ho: µ = 16
Ha: µ ≠ 16
x − µ 16 .45 −16
=
t = s 3.59 = 0.56
n 20
Ho: µ = 60
Ha: µ < 60
x − µ 58 .42 − 60
=
t = s 25 .68 = -0.88
n 8
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 10
Ho: µ = 1,160
Ha: µ > 1,160
Ho: µ = 8.3
Ha: µ ≠ 8.3
For two-tail test, α /2 = .005 critical t.005,19 = ±2.861
x − µ 8.37 − 8.3
=
t = s .189 = 1.66
n 20
H0: µ = 1.84
Ha: µ ≠ 1.84
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 11
x − µ 1.85083 −1.84
=
t = s .02353 = 1.59
n 12
Ho: µ = $1.16
Ha: µ > $1.16
x − µ 1.1948 −1.16
=
t = s .0889 = 1.96
n 25
H0: µ = $32.28
Ha: µ ≠ $32.28
x − µ 31 .67 − 32 .28
=
t = s 1.29 = -2.06
n 19
H0: µ = 19
Ha: µ ≠ 19
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 12
Since the Excel p-value = .256 > α /2 = .025 and MINITAB p-value =.513 > .05,
the decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.
She would not conclude that her city is any different from the ones in the
national survey.
pˆ − p .465 − .45
=
z = p⋅q (. 45 )(. 55 ) = 0.53
n 310
x 55
n = 100 x = 55 pˆ = = = .55
n 100
pˆ − p .465 − .45
=
z = p⋅q (. 45 )(. 55 ) = -1.66
n 310
x 207
n = 740 x = 207 pˆ = = = .28 α = .05
n 740
pˆ − p .28 − .29
=
z = p ⋅q (. 29 )(. 71) = -0.60
n 740
p-Value Method:
z = -0.60
pˆ c − p
z = p ⋅q
n
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 14
pˆ c − .29
±1.96 = (. 29 )(. 71)
740
p̂c
= .29 ± .033
x 164
pˆ = = = .4316
n 380
pˆ − p .4316 − .48
=
z = p⋅q (. 48 )(. 52 ) = -1.89
n 380
Since the observed z = -1.89 is greater than z.005= -2.575, The decision is to fail to
reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to declare that the
proportion is any different than .48.
x 303
pˆ = = = .7301
n 415
pˆ − p 7301 − .79
=
z = p ⋅q (. 79 )(. 21) = -3.00
n 415
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 15
Since the observed z = -3.00 is less than z.01= -2.33, The decision is to reject the
null hypothesis.
x 200
pˆ = = = .3333
n 600
pˆ − p .3333 − .31
=
z = p ⋅q (. 31)(. 69 ) = 1.23
n 600
Since the observed z = 1.23 is less than z.005= 1.645, The decision is to fail to
reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to declare that the
proportion is any different than .48.
Ho: p = .24
Ha: p < .24
x 130
pˆ = = = .2167
n 600
pˆ − p .2167 − .24
=
z = p ⋅q (.24 )(. 76 ) = -1.34
n 600
Since the observed z = -1.34 is greater than z.05= -1.645, The decision is to fail to
reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to declare that the
proportion is less than .24.
pˆ − p .22 − .18
=
z = p⋅q (. 18 )(. 82 ) = 2.02
n 376
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 16
Since the observed z = 2.02 is less than z.01= 2.33, The decision is to fail to reject
the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to declare that the proportion
is greater than .18.
x 22
n = 118 x = 22 pˆ = = = .186 α = .01
n 118
pˆ − p .186 − .32
=
z = p ⋅q (. 32 )(. 68 ) = -3.12
n 118
Since the observed z = -3.12 is less than z.05= -1.645, The decision is to reject the
null hypothesis.
n = 67 x = 40 α = .05 α /2 = .025
x 40
pˆ = = = .597
n 67
pˆ − p .597 − .47
=
z = p⋅q (. 47 )(. 53 ) = 2.08
n 67
Since the observed z = 2.08 is greater than z.025= 1.96, The decision is to reject the
null hypothesis.
χ 2
.05,14 = 23.6848
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 17
(15 −1)( 32 )
χ 2
= = 22.4
20
χ 2
.05,21 = 32.6705
(22 −1)(17 )
χ 2
= = 42
8 .5
Since χ 2 = 42 > χ 2
.05,21 = 32.6705, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
χ 2
.01,7 = 18.4753
(8 −1)( 4.12 ) 2
χ 2
= = 2.64
45
χ 2
.025,10 = 20.4831 χ 2
.975,10 = 3.24697
(11 −1)(1.2)
χ 2
= = 2.4
5
Since χ 2
= 2.4 < χ 2
.975,10 = 3.24697, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 18
χ 2
.025,11 = 21.92 χ 2
.975,11 = 3.81575
χ 2
.01,15 = 30.5779
χ 2
.05,12 = 21.0261 χ 2
.95,12 = 5.22603
Since χ 2 = 49.93 > χ 2.05,12 = 21.0261, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis. The variance has changed.
χ 2
.01,6 = 16.8119
(7 −1)(. 1156 )
χ 2
= = 17.34
.04
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c −100
-1.28 = 14
48
x c = 97.4
xc − µ 97 .4 − 99
z = s = 14 = -0.79
n 48
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c −100
-1.645 = 14
48
x c = 96.68
xc − µ 96 .68 − 99
z = s = 14 = -1.15
n 48
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 20
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c −100
-2.33 = 14
48
x c = 95.29
xc − µ 95 .29 − 99
z = s = 14 = -1.84
n 48
a) µa = 98.5 zc = -1.645
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c −100
-1.645 = 14
48
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 21
x c = 96.68
xc − µ 96 .68 − 99
z = s = 14 = -0.90
n 48
b) µa = 98 zc = -1.645
x c = 96.68
xc − µ 96 .68 − 98
zc = s = 14 = -0.65
n 48
c) µa = 97 z.05 = -1.645
x c = 96.68
xc − µ 96 .68 − 97
z = s = 14 = -0.16
n 48
d) µa = 96 z.05 = -1.645
x c = 97.4
xc − µ 96 .68 − 96
z = s = 14 = 0.34
n 48
e) As the alternative value get farther from the null hypothesized value, the
probability of committing a Type II error reduces. (All other variables being held
constant).
9.35 Ho: µ = 50
Ha: µ ≠ 50
µa = 53 n = 35 s=7 α = .01
xc − µ
zc = s
n
x c − 50
±2.575 = 7
35
x c = 50 ± 3.05
xc − µ 53 .05 − 53
z = s = 7 = 0.04
n 35
Other end:
xc − µ 46 .9 − 53
z = s = 7 = -5.11
n 35
pˆ c − p
zc = p ⋅q
n
pˆ c − .65
-1.645 = (. 65 )(. 35 )
360
pˆ c − p .609 −.60
z = p ⋅q = (. 60 )(. 40 ) = -0.35
n 360
p̂ c = .609
pˆ c − P .609 −.55
z = P ⋅Q = (. 55 )(. 45 ) = -2.25
n 360
p̂ c = .609
pˆ c − p .609 −.50
z = p ⋅q = (. 50 )(. 50 ) = -4.14
n 360
H0: µ = 44
Ha: µ ≠ 44 z.025 = ± 1.96
45 .1 − 44
z = 8.7 = 0.96
58
Since z = 0.96 < zc = 1.96, the decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.
x c − 44
+ 1.96 = 8. 7
58
± 2.239 = x c - 44
For 45 years:
46 .29 − 45
z = 8.7 = 1.08
58
For 46 years:
46 .239 − 46
z = 8.7 = 0.21
58
For 47 years:
46 .9 − 47
z = 8.7 = -0.67
58
For 48 years:
46 .248 − 48
z = 8 .7 = 1.54
58
324
n = 463 x = 324 p̂ = = .6998 α = .10
463
z.10 = -1.28
pˆ − p .6998 − .71
=
z = p ⋅q (. 71)(. 29 ) = -0.48
n 463
Since the observed z = -0.48 > z.10 = -1.28, the decision is to fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 27
Type II error:
pˆ c − p
zc = p ⋅q
n
pˆ c − .71
-1.28 = (. 71)(. 29 )
463
p̂ = .683
For pa = .69
.683 −.69
z = (. 69 )(. 31) = -0.33
463
For pa = .66
.683 −.66
z = (. 66 )(. 34 ) = 1.04
463
For pa = .60
.683 −.60
z = (. 60 )(. 40 ) = 4.61
493
9.39
1) Ho: µ = 36
Ha: µ ≠ 36
x −µ
2) z = s
n
3) α = .01
x −µ 38 .4 − 36
6) z = s = 5.93 = 3.21
n 63
7) Since the observed value of z = 3.21 is greater than z.005 = 2.575, the decision is
to reject the null hypothesis.
x −µ
t = s
n
3) α = .05
4) df = n - 1 = 16, t.05,16 = -1.746. If the observed value of t is less than -1.746, then
the decision will be to reject the null hypothesis.
5) n = 17 x = 7.01 s = 1.69
x −µ 7.01 − 7.82
6) t = s = 1.69 = -1.98
n 17
7) Since the observed t = -1.98 is less than the table value of t = -1.746, the decision
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 29
9.41
a. 1) Ho: p = .28
Ha: p > .28
pˆ − p
2) z = p ⋅q
n
3) α = .10
4) This is a one-tailed test, z.10 = 1.28. If the observed value of z is greater than
1.28, the decision will be to reject the null hypothesis.
5) n = 783 x = 230
230
pˆ = = .2937
783
.2937 −.28
6) z = (. 28 )(. 72 ) = 0.85
783
7) Since z = 0.85 is less than z.10 = 1.28, the decision is to fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
b. 1) Ho: p = .61
Ha: p ≠ .61
pˆ − p
2) z = p ⋅q
n
3) α = .05
4) This is a two-tailed test, z.025 = + 1.96. If the observed value of z is greater than
1.96 or less than -1.96, then the decision will be to reject the null hypothesis.
5) n = 401 p̂ = .56
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 30
.56 −.61
6) z = (. 61 )(. 39 ) = -2.05
401
7) Since z = -2.05 is less than z.025 = -1.96, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
( n −1) s 2
2) χ 2
=
σ2
3) α = .01
χ 2
.01,17 = 33.4087
5) s2 = 29.6
7) Since the observed χ 2 = 32.675 is less than 33.4087, the decision is to fail to
reject the null hypothesis.
Solving for x :
c
xc − µ
z =
c σ
n
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 31
x c −130
2.33 = 12
75
x c = 133.23
b) H0: p = .44
Ha: p < .44
pˆ c − p
zc = p ⋅q
n
pˆ c − .44
-1.645 = (. 44 )(. 56 )
1095
p̂c = .4153
.4153 −.42
z = (. 42 )(. 58 ) = -0.32
1095
n = 80 α = .01 p̂ = .39
z.01 = 2.33
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 32
pˆ − p .39 − .32
=
z = p ⋅q (. 32 )(. 68 ) = 1.34
n 80
Since the observed z = 1.34 < z.01 = 2.33, the decision is to fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
Ho: µ = 3.3
Ha: µ ≠ 3.3
x −µ 3.45 −3.3
z = σ = 1.31 = 1.05
n 64
Since the observed z = 1.05 < zc = 1.96, the decision is to Fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
x 93
9.46 n = 210 x = 93 α = .10 pˆ = = = .443
n 210
Ho: p = .57
Ha: p< .57
pˆ − p .443 − .57
=
z = p⋅q (. 57 )(. 43) = -3.72
n 210
Since the observed z = -3.72 < zc = -1.28, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 33
χ 2
.05,11 = 19.6751
5.6 −8.4
t = 1.3 = -5.70
7
Since the observed t = - 5.70 < t.005,6 = -3.707, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
a) Ho: µ = $25,000
Ha: µ > $25,000 α = .05
x −µ 26 ,650 − 25 ,000
z = s = 12 ,000 = 1.38
n 100
Since the observed z = 1.38 < z.05 = 1.645, the decision is to fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
b) µa = $30,000 zc = 1.645
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 34
Solving for x :
c
xc − µ
zc = s
n
( x c − 25 ,000 )
1.645 = 12 ,000
100
26 ,974 − 30 ,000
z = 12 ,000 = -2.52
100
χ 2
.10,7 = 12.017
(8 −1)( 7.80 ) 2
χ 2
= = 106.47
4
x 66
n = 125 x = 66 α = .05 pˆ = = = .528
n 125
pˆ − p .528 − .46
=
z = p ⋅q (. 46 )(. 54 ) = 1.53
n 125
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 35
Since the observed value of z = 1.53 < z.05 = 1.645, the decision is to fail to reject
the null hypothesis.
pˆ c − p
zc = p ⋅q
n
pˆ c − .46
1.645 = (. 46 )(. 54 )
125
p̂c = .533
pˆ c − p a .533 − .50
=
z = pa ⋅ qa (.50)(.50) = 0.74
n 125
H0: µ = 185
Ha: µ < 185
t.05,15 = - 1.753
x −µ 175 −185
t = s = 14 .28286 = -2.80
n 16
Since observed t = - 2.80 < t.05,15 = - 1.753, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
9.53 H0: p = .16
Ha: p > .16
x 84
n = 428 x = 84 α = .01 pˆ = = = .1963
n 428
pˆ − p .1963 − .16
=
z = p ⋅q (. 16 )(. 84 ) = 2.05
n 428
Since the observed z = 2.05 < z.01 = 2.33, the decision is to fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
pˆ c − p
zc = p ⋅q
n
. pˆ c − .16
2.33 = (. 16 )(. 84 )
428
p̂c = .2013
pˆ c − p a .2013 − .21
=
z = pa ⋅ qa (.21)(.79) = -0.44
n 428
x −µ 19 .34 −15
z = s = 4.52 = 5.68
n 35
Since the observed z = 5.68 > zc = 1.28, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 37
χ 2
.05,21 = 32.6705
(22 −1)( 6) 2
χ 2
= = 47.25
16
t.01,8 = 2.896
x −µ 3.4 − 2.5
t = s = 0.6 = 4.50
n 9
Since the observed t = 4.50 > t.01,8 = 2.896, the decision is to reject the null
hypothesis.
x −µ 22 .83 − 23 .58
z = s = 5.11 = -1.43
n 95
Since the observed z = -1.43 > z.025 = -1.96, the decision is to fail to reject the
null hypothesis.
xc − µ
b) zc = s
n
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 38
x c − 23 .58
+ 1.96 = 5.11
95
xc = 23.58 + 1.03
xc = 22.55, 24.61
x c − µa 22 .55 − 22 .30
z = s = 5.11 = 0.48
n 95
x c − µa 24 .61 − 22 .30
z = s = 5.11 = 4.41
n 95
from Table A.5, the areas for z = 0.48 and z = 4.41 are .1844 and .5000
H0: σ 2 = 2.5
Ha: σ 2 ≠ 2.5
χ 2
.025,11 = 21.92
χ 2
..975,11 = 3.81575
If the observed χ 2 is greater than 21.92 or less than 3.81575, the decision is to
reject the null hypothesis.
Since the observed χ 2 = 45.866 is greater than χ 2.025,11 = 21.92, the decision is to
reject the null hypothesis. The population variance is significantly more than
2.5.
x −µ
t = s
n
Since the p-value = .045 < α = .05, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
The sample proportion, p̂ = .205729 which is less than the hypothesized p = .25.
One conclusion is that the population proportion is lower than .25.
Chapter 9: Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing for Single Populations 40
This is a one-tailed test. The sample mean is 2.555 which is more than the
hypothesized value. The observed t value is 1.51 with an associated
p-value of .072 for a one-tailed test. Because the p-value is greater than
α = .05, the decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.
There is not enough evidence to conclude that beef prices are higher.