Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michelle Nguyen
camenaerosa@gmail.com
Sarah Eltantawi
RELI E-1010/W
28 April 2011
Part I Although Sam Harris has written that the primary purpose of Letter to a Christian
Nation is “to arm secularists in [American] society, who believe that religion should be
kept out of public policy, against their opponents on the Christian Right” (viii), his
approach reveals a more radical set of commitments. In less than 100 pages he presents a
set of lean arguments meant to discredit not only the moral authority of the Abrahamic
traditions, but also to abolish the legitimacy of all faith-based discourse, which he sees as
violently divisive, wholly incompatible with rational inquiry, and obstructive to modern
civilization.
1) Harris argues that so long as there are “better and worse ways to seek happiness
in this world”, a universal standard of morality can be ascertained without the need for a
lawgiving God, since knowledge of the “psychological laws that govern human well-being”
would provide a more enduring basis for an objective morality than scripture (23-24). The
premise is that religions value happiness and human well-being insufficiently because they
tend to “divorce morality from the reality of human and animal suffering” (25). Harris cites
Christians who oppose abortion more vigorously than genocide as one example of moral
2) Harris argues that competing religious doctrines have divided up the world into
separate moral communities, resulting in a continual source of conflict (79). He claims that
religion is a more powerful motivating factor than tribalism, racism, or politics because “it
is the only form of in-group/out-group thinking that casts the differences between people
in terms of eternal rewards and punishments” (80). His evidence is a list of tragedies
where countless murders have been committed in the name of religion, including
Nguyen 2
Palestine, the Balkans, Northern Ireland, Kashmir, Sudan, Nigeria, and many others. In an
effort to counter those who would attribute religious violence to a “lack of education, [to]
(82). For Harris, Islam is to blame for having nursed their hatred of infidels and inspired
3) Harris argues that religious tolerance, while preferable to religious war, has not
been without its pitfalls, namely that religious ideas such as a belief in God and Paradise
are protected against criticism instead of being rejected as incompatible with scientific
rationality, which Harris seems to hold as the only reliable determinant of what a “viable,
global civilization” should look like (80). Furthermore, he deems attempts at interfaith
that are “fundamentally incompatible and, in principle, immune to revision” (86-87). Here
his evidence is the certainty with which people of faith believe their “religion is perfect and
Part II Returning to Harris’ first claim, his belief that religion does little to contribute
to human well-being due to its tendency to frame moral questions as separate from the
priority is one that nevertheless affects millions of American women each year and hits
very close to home. Genocide, on the other hand, is usually happening in far-off countries,
which makes it more difficult to sensitize anyone to such issues, not only religious people
who might be pushing other agendas. In any case, if Harris’ views on abortion could be
deduced, he would probably fault Christian “pro-lifers” for imagining that they are
preventing the murder of innocents on the basis of the religiously-grounded belief that life
Nguyen 3
begins at conception when in fact they are inflicting suffering on women who are unready
for motherhood, curtailing their rights to exercise control over their own bodies, and
turning a blind eye to matters of greater importance. This, however, would be a caricature,
For example, in 1990 the Reverend Terry Hamilton gave a sermon on the need for
the church to face the issue of abortion “in a distinctly Christian manner”, which meant
dropping the political banners of “pro-life” and “pro-choice” and reframing the issue
“around God's call to care for the least among us whom Jesus calls his sisters and
brothers”, a reference to Matthew 25:31-46. Hamilton pointed out that the Gospels
favored women and children, with the one oppressed and the other powerless, stressing
the responsibility of the Christian community to care for both rather than pitting these two
groups as enemies of one another in a battle over rights. Her stories were about how
members of a Methodist and Roman Catholic Church acted together to support two
women who would otherwise have had much difficulty in raising a child alone. Professor
Stanley Hauerwas, who teaches theological ethics at Duke Divinity School, contributed to
the reflection by addressing the problem of male promiscuity and arguing that the church
must also hold men responsible for their progeny and sexual power. Thus, although this
particular response to abortion was not framed in reference to human suffering or to its
alleviation, neither was it insensitive to it, for it went beyond condemning abortion as
“wrong” to how Christians should act in such situations as to honor their communal
obligations. Hamilton and Hauerwas spoke of the importance of care and responsibility in
the name of a distinctively Christian morality, and though Harris would argue that one can
seems foolish to dogmatically insist that religion has no potential worth exploring when it
Harris’ second claim, however, is more problematic than the first. Is it true that
religions merely retrace the boundaries of tribalism, racism, and politics only to bloody
them under the guise of sanctity? It would be impossible to analyze here all of the cases
that Harris cites, but suffice it to say that human conflict is rarely reducible to a single, or
even primary, cause. Nevertheless, especially after the September 11 attacks, even
educated lay people like Harris increasingly perceive Islam as an inherently violent religion
that breeds terrorists, oppresses women, and fans the flames for anti-Western sentiment.
Rarely is its rich history considered in conjunction with the deep and complex problems
that the Muslim world now faces as it struggles, unevenly, with the demands and
pressures of globalization. Bassam Tibi, a political scientist originally from Syria but now
fundamentalist ideology of political Islam. One need only consider how the term jihad is
Jihad means ‘struggle’, or striving, and it can refer to both armed and unarmed
forms. When the Prophet Mohammed engaged in jihad against the Meccans, he did so not
out of desire for worldly power, wealth, or prestige but in order to defend the faithful of
the Medina and to follow the Path of God. Rabia Terri Harris claims that it was his
commitment to the Greater Struggle, “the inward effort of confronting our lower nature”
that enabled him to succeed in the Lesser Struggle—“the outward effort of confronting
social injustice” (95). Mary Pat Fischer describes this lesser jihad as “the safeguarding of
one’s life, faith, livelihood, honor, and the integrity of the Muslim community” (428), but
she also writes that jihadis are never allowed to harm women, children, or unarmed
civilians and insists that terrorist tactics are not permitted by the Qur’an.
Nguyen 5
What, then, legitimates Al-Qaeda’s use of jihad to justify suicide operations against
‘infidels’ (mainly Westerners) and ‘apostates’ (moderate Muslims and Arabs)? Assaf
Moghadam suggests that “Salafi Jihad” is best thought of as a religious ideology in that its
beliefs are more akin to modern political ideologies than to a religion even though it
invokes religion and claims to act on its behalf (46). He contrasts religion and ideology to
the extent that the former “focuses on maximizing individual benefit through group
participation” while the latter is “intent on maximizing group benefit through individual
participation” (48). As with other totalitarian ideologies, the individual is submerged and
defined solely by his relation to the group, which demands complete control over the
thoughts, words, and deeds of its adherents. Yet it should be stressed that anyone who
believes Al-Qaeda’s claims that their version of Islam is definitive has not only forgotten
history but sprinkled salt onto a festering wound—other voices within the Muslim world
that deserve to be heard are then drowned out by fear and hatred.
Tolerance has its pitfalls not only because it shields religious communities from
criticism but also because it allows some of them to avoid interacting with each other. Any
truly global culture must be the collaborative creation of a global constituency, and this is
religious conversation to one of exchange, respect, and mutual concern. Pluralism aims for
open, committed discussion and engagement to the creation of a common civil society as
Part III Perhaps the most difficult part about combating violent instincts and
could be entirely committed to the idea of peace and loving one’s enemies yet feel
Nguyen 6
overpowered by negative thoughts and feelings whenever she encounters those who have
hurt or wronged her. This is where it is helpful to have not only teachings but also
techniques for developing awareness and self-mastery over one’s emotional states.
Though different kinds of meditation have been practiced by followers of all the world’s
major religions since antiquity, the Buddhist tradition is a particularly rich resource in
goodwill toward oneself and others” by focusing loving attention on one’s being and
repeating the phrases “May I be free from enmity, May I be free from ill will, May I be free
from distress, May I keep myself happy” before directing these same wishes toward
someone who is beloved, then someone who is dear, then someone who is neutral or
unknown, and then finally to someone who is repellent (30). The mind becomes suppler
and less attached to rigid categories. This practice, so simple to learn, could be easily
involved.
However, for those who wish to delve deeper, Buddhism offers another technique
called Vipassana, or Insight meditation, whose ultimate goal is to purify the mind of
hatred, greed, ego, and delusion. It teaches that by learning to observe one’s subtlest
sensations and developing complete equanimity to them, one can experience the truths of
mind and matter and liberate oneself from suffering. This technique has been practiced
successfully by people coming from many different faiths, but it is not suited for everyone
for it requires a good deal of discipline, at least ten consecutive days in order to learn it,
and the willingness to follow a specific code of conduct during the course, which includes
abstaining from engaging in prayer, ritual, and other meditation techniques. Yet those who
Nguyen 7
Works Cited
Assaf Moghadam. The Globalization of Martyrdom: Al Qaeda, Salafi Jihad, and the diffusion
of Suicide
Barram Tibi. The Challenge of Fundamentalism: Political Islam and the New World Disorder.
Berkeley:
Christopher S. Queen. “The Peace Wheel: Nonviolent Activism in the Buddhist Tradition”.
Subverting
Mary Pat Fischer. Living Religions. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010.
Sam Harris. Letter to a Christian Nation, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.