Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2500
Source:NSE
1) Company Background 3
2) Operating Segment 3
3) Sector Overview 4
a) Macro Economic Headwind to Stay in Near Term 4
b) Inflation a Primary Concern 4
c) NIM to get Compressed Marginally 5
d) Credit Cost to Soften on Melioration of Asset Quality 6
e) Interest Rate Deregualation 7
f) New Banking License to Increase Competition 7
4) Recent Quarter Performance 8
5) Investment Merits 9
a) NIM marginal Compression Followed by Expansion 9
b) Strong Non-interest Income to Support Net Income 10
c)Cost to Income Ratio to Fall 10
d)Firm NII Growth 10
e) Melioration in Asset Quality 11
f) Loan Portfolio to Grow at a CAGR of 24% 11
g) ROA to Improve in Long run 12
h) Space for Leverage 12
i) ROE to Improve Further 13
j) Adequate Capital to Support Growth 13
6) Investment Concerns 13
7) Outlook And Valuation 14
8) Financial Statement Exhibits 15
9) Disclosures 17
Treasury Segment accounted for Treasury: The Treasury segment is primarily responsible for dealing with Foreign
15.1% of total revenue in FY10. Exchange and Derivatives, Local Currency Money Market & Debt Securities, and
Equities. The Treasury Segment is responsible for managing the return and market of
SLR and other investments. Treasury Segment represented 15.1% of total revenue in
FY10 (See Chart 2, Below).
Chart 2 : Revenue by Business Segment
15.1%
7.6%
50.7%
26.6%
Sector Overview
Macro Economic Headwinds to Stay in Near Term: The Indian banking sector has
Macro economic factors like
already bounced back from the eventuality of corruption charges against some of the
inflation and policy rates to tame
very highly placed people in the industry and 2G scam. However, macro economic
inflation will remain a concern.
factors like inflation and policy rates to tame inflation will remain concerns in the
first half of FY12. Higher inflation may put pressure on deposit growth rate and
attract policy tightening measures by the central bank. However, we believe
inflationary pressure with reduce from mid of the fiscal year.
Inflation a Primary Concern: The Indian economy has experienced a stable and low
inflationary environment during FY 00 and FY05. Inflationary environment became
volatile and high during the recent years, primarily driven by high food and
commodity prices.
Average primary article inflation remained at 14.5% during January FY09 and
Food inflation to remain moderate to February FY11. It has reached a peak of 22.16% in March FY10. However, it has
high as the food inflation is a result experienced moderation since March FY10 to 14.79% in February FY11 (See Chart
of changes in food habit and 3, Below). Primary article inflation was mainly driven by higher price of all of its
reduction of food productive land components (Food Articles, Non-Food Articles and Minerals); however, food article
due to industrialization and inflation contributed maximum as it has higher weightage ( 14.34% of WPI and
urbanization. 71.27% of Primary Article Inflation) in the primary inflation index. Average inflation
for food article remained at 15.10% during January FY09 to February FY 11.
Food article inflation eased from 20.97% in June FY11 to 10.16% in February FY11.
However, we believe food inflation will remain moderate to high as the food inflation
is a result of changes in food habit and reduction of food productive land due to
industrialization and urbanization. Along with the structural changes, increase in
income level of people also played a significant role in the price increase.
Chart 3: Primary Inflation and Its Components
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
J a n-08
J a n-09
J a n-10
J a n-11
Feb-08
M a r-08
May-08
Jun-08
Jul-08
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Feb-09
M a r-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Feb-10
M a r-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Sep-10
Oct-10
Nov-10
Dec-10
Feb-11
Apr-08
Aug-08
Apr-09
Aug-09
Apr-10
Aug-10
Source: MOSPI
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
-2.00%
Primary(Wtg:20.12%) Fuel & Power (Wtg:14.91%) Manufactured (64.97%) WPI All (Wtg. 100%)
Source: MOSPI
Net Interest Margin to Get Compressed Marginally: The banking sector NIM is
likely to fall marginally , primarily following the below stated reasons:
1. Upward Re-pricing of Deposit Rates: In a fast growing economic
environment, credit uptake is likely to pick up with the increase in credit
Following slower deposit growth
demand from industrie s for capital expenditure to fulfill the increasing
than the credit growth and with very
product demand in the economy. Same time in a high inflationary
less excess SLR investment, banks
environment saving growth is likely to moderate as people will always search
are likely to compete for attracting
alternative investment opportunities to get higher return for protecting the
new deposits by increasing the
value of saving from inflationary pressure. Following slower deposit growth
deposit rate.
than the credit growth and with very less excess SLR investment, banks are
likely to compete for attracting new deposits by increasing deposit rates.
Credit Cost Likely to Soften Due to Melioration in Asset Quality: Asset quality of
banks significantly deteriorated during FY08 to FY11 due to impact of the recent
Following expected GDP
global economic turmoil. However, the banking industry has experienced
growth of more than 8%,
improvements in assets quality in recent quarters following growing corporate
slippage is likely to
financial health along with the economic growth. Asset quality for private sector
improve.
banks are likely to remain strong compared to public sector banks due to conservative
credit policy opted by private sector banks. Historically, we have seen slippages are
highly correlated with GDP and IIP with a lag (See Chart 5, Below). Following
expected GDP growth of more than 8% , slippage is likely to improve.
3.0% 11.5%
10.5%
2.5% 9.5%
8.5%
7.5%
2.0%
6.5%
5.5%
1.5% 4.5%
3.5%
1.0% 2.5%
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
Slippage (%) LHS GDP Growth One Year Before (%) RHS IIP Growth One Year Before (%) RHS
(i) Cost of fund likely to increase significantly in the near term following
irregular competition among banks with low CASA ratio to attract savings
deposits. However, we believe saving banks deposits rate will come to an
equilibrium rate in the long term.
(ii) We believe public sector banks will get effected more than private sector
banks as component of other income in total income is less in public sector
bank.
(iii) Banks like HDFC Bank, AXIS Bank will be less impacted as current account
deposits consist of a significant portion of CASA for these banks.
Aggressive strategies of the new
players in the market most likely to New Banking License to Increase Competition: New banking license is likely to
increase deposits rate, Increase increase competition in the banking sector. Once the RBI is ready with the
operating expense due to enhanced requirement norms to get a license for operating a bank, we believe many of the
customers service facilities, thus corporate houses and NBFC are likely to qualify for the requirements of the RBI. We
resulting less profitability for the believe banks with huge branch network like SBI,PNB,HDFCB and ICICI Bank will
banking sector. be less impacted by new bank licensing. Impact of new bank licensing will be visible
in case of banks with less number of branches and new private sector banks like YES
Bank, Indusind Bank, etc.
The bank reported a growth in total deposit of 24.2% y-o-y to Rs.1,922,015.6 million
in Q3 FY11. CASA ratio remained at 50.5% driven by a 30.7% y-o-y growth in
saving deposits to Rs.160,380.0 million in Q3 FY11. Gross advances grew by 32.7%
CASA ratio remained at 50.5%
y-o-y to Rs.160,6190.0 million in Q3 FY11. Asset quality in Q3 FY11 remained
driven by a 30.7% y-o-y growth in
healthy with GNPA to gross advances ratio of 1.1% and NNPA to net advances ratio
saving deposits.
at 0.5%.
As on December 31, 2010, the Bank’s distribution network was 1,780 branches and
5,121 ATMs in 833 cities as against 1,725 branches and 3,898 ATMs in 771 cities as
of December 31, 2009.
The Bank’s total Capital Adequacy Ratio as at December 31, 2010 (computed as per
Basel 2 guidelines) remained strong at 16.3%, against the regulatory minimum of 9%.
Tier-I CAR was 12.1% as of December 31, 2010.
500 4.0%
48.0% 48.0% 48.0%
400 48.0% 3.5%
300
3.0%
200
100 2.5%
0 47.9%
2.0%
FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
FY O6 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 E
CASA Per Branch (LHS) CASA Ratio (RHS)
HDFCB ICICIB AXIS SBI PNB
Source: Company Filings & BOE Source: Company Filings & BOE
Chart 8 : Composition of Deposits:
CASA 48.04%
20.97%
51.96%
27.07%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
40%
60000
50000 30%
40000
20%
30000
20000
10%
10000
0 0%
FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
Firm NII Growth Irrespective of Marginal NIM compression: NII has grown at a
Regardless of marginal NIM CAGR of 34.7% from Rs.25,458.4 million in FY06 to Rs.83,866.0 million in FY10.
compression, NIM of HDFC Bank We have factored NIM compression of 25 basis point in FY11, following the adverse
is likely to distinctly stand out of its impact of macroeconomic headwinds. Regardless of marginal NIM compression, NIM
peers. of HDFC Bank is likely to distinctly stand out of its peers. Firm NIM along with
robust growth in advances results 17.9% y-o-y growth in NII for FY11 and 25.5%
CAGR for FY11 to FY14 (See Chart 11, Below).
250000 5.2%
4.9% 5.0%
200000
4.8%
Rs. Million
150000 4.6%
4.4%
4.2%4.4% 4.4%
100000 4.1% 4.4% 4.2%
4.0%
50000
3.8%
0 3.6%
FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
NII NIM
5%
Slippage 2.0% 86%
5% Increased
Significantly
4% in FY 09 1.5% 81%
4%
3% 1.0% 76%
2.64%
3% 2.22% 2.45%
2.56% 0.5% 71%
2% 2.35% 2.40% 2.45%
FY07 FY08 FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
0.0% 66%
Slippage FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
Gross NPA (%) Net NPA (%) Provision Coverage Ratio (%)
Source: Company Filings & BOE
Source: Company Filings & BOE
500000
0%
FY-06 FY-07 FY-08 FY-09 FY-10 0
FYO9 FY 10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
Sectorial(Private+ Public+ SBI & Associates) HDFCB
Source: Company Filings, RBI & BOE Source: Company Filings & BOE
Return on Assets to Improve Further in the Long Term: HDFC Bank ROA stood at
1.45% (Yearly Average) at the end of FY 10. It stands well above the industry average.
Comparing with its peers it stands next to AXIS Bank’s ROA (See Chart 16, Below).
We believe marginal ROA compression in FY11 following marginal compression in
NIM. We have factored a 20 basis point compression in ROA for FY11. However,
ROA of HDFC Bank will improve further following strong business growth and
profitability in the coming years. We anticipate an expansion in ROA of 45 basis point
to 1.7% in FY14 from 1.25% in FY11.
Chart 16: ROA, Peer Comparison
Chart 17: Dupont Analysis with Respect to Average Assets
Total Income
Tax
ROA
OPEX
P&C
NII
0.2%
0.0%
HDFCB ICICIB AXIS SBI PNB
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
FY O6 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 E
HDFCB ICICIB AXIS SBI PNB
3100
2600
2100
In Rs.
1600
1100
600
100
Closing Price 2x 3x 4x 5x 6x
3500
3000
2500
In Rs.
2000
1500
1000
500
Exhibit I: Income Statement (in millions of Rs. Except Per Share Data)
2009 2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E
Assets
Cash 15,862 24,353 32,820 62,641 97,562 121,729
Chart 22: Sources of Fund balance with Reserve Bank of India 119,410 130,480 169,630 208,979 256,895 312,035
Balances with banks and money at call and short notice 39,794 144,591 169,630 229,203 291,147 365,835
5,000,000 Investments 588,175 586,076 697,604 887,152 1,099,509 1,342,828
Advances 988,830 1,258,306 1,633,418 2,024,398 2,478,723 3,083,359
4,000,000
Rs. Million
1,000,000
Capital and Liabilities
0 Equity Capital 4,254 4,577 4,577 4,577 4,577 4,577
Equity Shares Warrants 4,009 0 0 0 0 0
Reserve & Surplus 142,209 210,618 234,517 268,051 314,524 377,699
Employee Stock Options 55 29 28 26 25 24
Profit per employee (Rs. Million) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 0.8
Business per employee (Rs. Million) 45.9 56.5 64.6 77.2 87.8 101.6 77.5
Staff Cost / Operating Expenses (%) 40.5% 39.7% 40.2% 39.8% 40.2% 39.7% 39.9%
Staff Cost /Total Income (%) 20.9% 18.8% 18.6% 16.5% 15.0% 13.4% 16.5%
Business Per Branch (Rs. Million) 1,711.7 1,699.9 1,938.7 2,240.2 2,544.9 2,844.8 2,253.7
Valuation Ratios
P/E ratio (x) 40.5 31.7 30.4 21.7 15.6 11.5 22.2
P/BV (x) 6.0 4.3 3.9 3.4 2.9 2.4 3.4
P/ABV (x) 6.3 4.4 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.5
ROA (%) 1.4% 1.5% 1.2% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7% 1.4%
Leverage (x) 11.9 11.1 11.0 12.3 13.3 13.8 12.3
ROE (%) 16.9% 16.1% 13.5% 16.9% 20.2% 23.2% 18.0%
Certifications:
The BOE Group (BOE) is comprised of BOE Securities, Inc., BOE Research Services, Inc. and BOE Research Private Limited. BOE hereby certifies that the views
expressed in this research report accurately reflect the company’s independent personal views about the subject stocks and issuers. This report was prepared by Janaki
Ballav Panigrahi. BOE also certifies that no part of BOE’s or the analyst’s respective compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific
recommendations or view expressed in this research report.
BOE’s financial analysts are not subjected to NASD rule 2711 and NYSE rule 472 which provide guidance on communications with subject company, public appearances
and trading securities, held by BOE Research Private Limited or its affiliates. However, BOE makes its best efforts to ensure the highest professional and ethical standards
are adhered to its analysts.
Stock Ratings:
Buy: Stocks whose total return is expected to exceed the S&P 500 Index average over the next 12 months.
Hold: Stocks whose total return is expected to be in line with the S&P 500 Index average over the next 12 months.
Sell: Stocks whose total return is expected to be below the S&P 500 Index average over the next 12 months.
Not Rated: BOE has decided not to publish a rating on this stock due to unusual or extraordinary business circumstances.
Other Disclosures:
The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the
solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. BOE will not treat recipients as its customers by virtue of their receiving
the report. The investments or services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment
advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes a personal recommendation to you.
Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by BOE to be reliable, but BOE makes no representation as to their
accuracy or completeness, except with respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Additional information is available upon request. BOE accepts no liability for loss
arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that liability arises under specific statutes or
regulations applicable to BOE. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. BOE may have issued, and may in the future
issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect the different assumptions,
views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and BOE is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any
recipient of this report.
Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future
performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publicat ion by BOE and are subject to change without
notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and
financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments.
Investors in securities such as ADR’S, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk.
BOE does not make markets in any of the securities mentioned in this report. BOE and its employees may have long/short positions or holdings in the securities or other
related investments of companies mentioned herein. Neither the analysts responsible for this report nor any related household members are officers, directors, or advisory
board members of any covered company. No one at a covered company is on the Board of Directors of BOE Research Private Limited or any of its affiliates. BOE or any
of its employees do not own shares equal to one percent or more of the company in this report .