Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assamese food is mainly based on rice and fish. For dessert, or for those with a sweet tooth,
there is a wide range in "pithas" (cakes). Rice is the staple diet in Assam and is eaten in
various forms throughout the day. The Assamese eat a huge variety of rice-based breakfast
cereals with milk, yoghurt or thick creamakhoi (puffed rice), chira (chura), muri, komal chaul
(a specially processed rice which doesn’t require cooking but just an hour’s soak in cold
water) and hurum to name but a few. Normally jaggery or sugar is added but for those who
prefer savoury items, salt can be added. Also there are the various kinds of pitha that are
prepared from rice powder. Authentic Assamese cuisine is bland and yet very delicious. Very
little oil is used and practically no spices. All Assamese people are non-vegetarian. Chicken
is taboo in orthodox families and there are some, who may not eat meat. But it’s difficult to
find anyone who does not eat fish and duck’s eggs. Some of their most favourite food are :
Assam Laksa and Koat Pitha. Assam Laksa is a rich spicy broth made with a stock of flaked
ikan kembong and Daun kesom (polygonum). Assam Laksa is also known as Penang laksa.
Koat Pitha, also known as Banana Pitha, is a delicious cake prepared with banana, rice and
jaggery. In Indonesia, we called it fried banana.
Arunachali Cuisine
Poeple here generally take non-vegetarian diets. Most of their cuisines include non-vegetarian
meals. Apong (local drinks made from rice or millet) is also take by the people here.
Manipuri Cuisine
Cuisines of the North East India include the delicious delectable dishes of Manipur. The
traditional dining in banana leaves is an elaborate affair. Rice, meat and fishes make most of
their dishes. Kabok, a traditional cuisine, made of rice and vegetables is more like the fried
rice popular through out India. The Iromba, combination of fish, vegetables and bamboo
shoots is served fermented.
Meghalayan Cuisine
The Meghalayan cuisine is is rich in meat and rice, particularly pork. Jadoh - a spicy dish of
rice and pork is eaten almost any time. Besides, the local pork delicacies cooked Khasi-style,
Shillong is also the Mecca of authentic Chinese food. Kyat, the local brew made from rice,
adds zing to all the local celebrations. You can taste it at any of the bars spread all over
Shillong Meghalaya.
Mizoram Cuisine
The people of Mizoram are basically non-vegetarian and love meat. The food is not spicy and
is cooked in such a way that the nutritive value is actually retained. The locally made wine is
a great favourite. "Zu" (tea) is a popular drink. Both men and women are fond of smoking.
Sikkimese Cuisine
Sikkim has its own unique dietary culture with specific cuisine and food recipes. You can get
a variety of food in Sikkim, but specialities like the Tibetan Thupka and Momos are very
popular here. A beverage to be sampled is the local 'Tchang', a beer made of millet and
served in a bamboo mug. You can find this at small restaurants serving Sikkimese cuisine.
Sikkimese are essentially rice-eaters. Alcoholic drinks are popular both amongst men and
women. Various traditional fermented foods and beverages is very common. Beef eating is
common amongst the Bhutias. Some of the common traditional cuisine with their food
recipes are - Momos, Gya Thuk or Thukpa, Ningro with Churpi, Gundruk, Phagshapa, Sael
Roti.
Tripuri Cuisine
The large Bengali community in Tripura makes for a non-vegetarian favoured cuisine, with
fish being an integral part of the menu. Various cuisines of fish are prepared for any
celebrations in Tripuri household.
Discussing language and ethnicity in South and Southeast Asia, Harold Schiffman draws a
useful distinction between what are historically presented as the ‘overt manifestations of
“high” linguistic culture’, the codified, written and official forms, and the covert or ‘folk-
cultural’ aspects which are more likely to be implicit, unstated and unofficial (1999: 431).
The same conceptual distinction may be extended to Tibetan and Himalayan studies, in which
Tibetan, Dzongkha and Newar comprise the former category, and ethnic groups speaking
unwritten Tibeto-Burman languages make up the latter. Now that activists in many minority
ethnic groups across the Himalayan region are engaged in the highly political process of re-
creating or ‘inventing’ written traditions and developing scripts for their previously oral
languages, and while countless rural Tibetans remain illiterate, it is apparent that we need to
move towards a more nuanced understanding of what, if anything, constitutes ‘high’ and
‘low’ linguistic culture.
A further hazard in using the term ‘Tibeto-Burman speaking’ as a convenient ethnic label is
that it appears to locate the peoples and groups it describes in a geographical space
specifically related to Tibet or Burma. What of the minority groups in Yúnnán, Baltistan,
Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Spiti, who speak Tibeto-Burman languages but who may have no
dealings with Tibet or Burma? It serves us well to remember that the Tibeto-Burman
language family draws its name from the status of two dominant ancient literary languages,
Burmese and Tibetan, and not from a field-based appraisal of contemporary linguistic
distribution and diversity.
Many publications in Nepal, in both English and Nepali, nevertheless continue to use the
phrase ‘Tibeto-Burman speaking’ or even ‘Mongolian’, to attribute putative ethno-racial
characteristics to communities speaking related languages. The political scientist Selma
Sonntag, writing on language planning in Nepal, favours the term ‘Tibeto-Nepalese’ instead
(2001: 165). While not in widespread use, this term conveys the sense that the languages
spoken by the groups in question are both less than the totality of the Tibeto-Burman
language family and firmly rooted within the national borders of modern Nepal.
An interesting issue emerges when organisations struggling for the upliftment of specific
ethno-linguistic groupings take on, proliferate or even actively conscript the same essentialist
terminology which social scientists have sought so hard to reject. Such stereotypes then
insinuate themselves into ethnic communities’ own descriptions and representations of
themselves as indigenous and homogenous. It becomes clear, that as linguists, social
scientists and area studies scholars, we still lack an effective metalanguage for describing and
categorising lived ethnolinguistic reality. As Nancy Dorian put it, we require ‘a language for
talking about language’ (1999: 33).
As a relatively young discipline, Tibetology may benefit from a critical appraisal of the
theories which have been formative for other area studies, specifically Indology. In India, as
many have noted, language has long been intimately interwoven with the religious complexes
of the subcontinent. Schiffman suggests that the most salient feature of ancient Indic
linguistic culture may have been a ‘concern for the preservation of sacred texts and the purity
of the language in which they were composed’ (1999: 433). This, in turn, has shaped modern
Indian views towards spoken tongues, linguistic change and lexical borrowings, and has
helped scholars better understand such attitudes. Prejudice towards variant linguistic forms is
also attested in the Tibetan context, as noted by Nicholas Tournadre and Sangda Dorje in
their introduction to the Manual of Standard Tibetan:
Many Tibetans, as well as some non-Tibetans consider that only Literary Tibetan has a true
grammar. Educated Tibetans are mildly disparaging of their spoken language, which they
consider “vulgar” or “ordinary” (Tib. phal-skad). Only classical Literary Tibetan is well
regarded enough to be “blessed” with grammar. (2003: 26)
The sense of wonder at the elegance and sophistication of classical or literary languages is
one which is shared by many observers. Sir William Jones, the great Orientalist, was alleged
to have praised Sanskrit for its ‘wonderful structure; more perfect than the Greek, more
copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either’ (de Bary 1958: 590), a
sentiment echoed to this day by some textual scholars of Tibetan and Sanskrit. A result of
such an approach, as so clearly noted by András Höfer, can be that scholars approach the
unwritten and endangered languages spoken by Himalayan ethnic groups as deviant or
‘broken’ forms of a poorly-remembered classical language, rather than as viable linguistic
varieties in their own right (2000: 234-235).
Moving on from Tibeto-Burman: the Thakali exercise in forgetting
In the remainder of this paper, I turn my focus to two ethnic communities in Nepal, the
Thakali and Thangmi, who offer compelling, contrastive examples of the shifting nature of
ethnolinguistic awareness and self-identification.
According to the contested Population Census of Nepal 2001, less than half of the total
Thakali population of 13,000 speak Thakali, a Tibeto-Burman language, as their mother
tongue (see Turin 2000 for a critique of the census). While the Thak Khola valley of lower
Mustang district, Nepal, was their traditional homeland, new business and trading
opportunities have resulted in mass Thakali out-migrations to urban centres and the lowlands
bordering India. The declining use of the Thakali language, however, predates the shift in
residence patterns and is more closely linked to the negative values associated with rural
speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages and their cultural habits which emanate from the
Nepali nation-state at the centre.
While the Thakalis’ growing alliance with Hinduism and their concomitant turning away
from shamanism and village Buddhism are well documented by anthropologists working in
the Himalayas, their changing speech patterns have been rather overlooked. As early as 1958,
Iijima reported that Thakalis generally did not converse in Thakali (Hutt 1986: 16), and the
trend continues to the present day. Despite pleas by the Thakali Central Cultural Committee,
few Thakali are making an effort to learn their language and practically no children from the
community speak Thakali as a mother tongue. Nevertheless, most Thakali adults continue to
believe that the existence of the Thakali language is central to their sense of a collective
Thakali identity, even if they themselves do not speak the language.
While the traditional portrayal of ethnic Thakali as willing converts to the social ideology of
Hinduism (Tucci 1952; Fürer-Haimendorf 1966) continues to be challenged (Fisher 1987,
2001), the fact remains that Thakali society has undergone dramatic transformation in the
space of two generations. The concomitant decline of the Thakali language is generally
presented by members of the Thakali community as an unfortunate by-product of the
necessary urbanisation and internationalisation of the Thakali community and its growing
alliance with the norms of Hindu Nepal. Critics from within the community suggest that the
previous generation inadvertently threw the baby out with the bath water in that the Thakali
language was jettisoned along with the cultural, dietary, religious and marital practices which
were thought to be unfashionable and undesirable within the context of a rapidly modernising
nation. In its present endangered state, the Thakali language has become the focus of a
campaign for preservation and documentation, led in part by members of the Thakali
Research Centre.
http://www.ancient-asia-journal.com/index.php/aa/article/viewArticle/4/7
Concluding Remarks
Due to the strategic geographical location of Northeast India which connects the East and the
South Asian regions, cultural affinities can be observed in the material cultural objects since
prehistoric times. These cultural affinities during the Neolithic period in Northeast India are
basically based on the celt making tradition, Cord-impressed pottery, and rice cultivation.
These are the characteristic features of the Neolithic culture which connects Northeast India
with Chinese Neolithic and Southeast Asian Neolithic cultures.
Also, we find some similarities of these features with the Neolithic cultures of Eastern and
Central India to some extent. The strong influence of the Neolithic culture of China and
Southeast Asia is one of the prominent factors in the origin and development of the Neolithic
culture of Northeast India, especially for the origin of pottery and agriculture. Though we are
in want of absolute dates for the origin of pottery and agriculture in this region, we can
presume that the cultural elements possibly entered Northeast India from the Neolithic
cultures of China and Southeast Asia. This presumption is based on three aspects; the
migration of people, linguistic relationships, and archaeological affinity. The time period of
the migration of the Tibeto-Burman and Austro-Asiatic language families of Northeast India
is not known, but on the basis of the archaeological affinity, it can be correlated to the
expansion of the culture and migration of the people of China and Southeast Asia during the
Neolithic period.
The Cord-impressed pottery predominantly found in Northeast India has the earliest antiquity
in East Asia and Southeast Asia. So, it is quite likely that the pottery tradition comes from
these areas in the form of acculturation, assimilation or diffusion. Without the presence of
absolute dates on the pottery of Northeast India, it will merely be a conjecture to provide a
date of origin. However, we can definitely cite the influence of the Neolithic cultures of East
Asia and Southeast Asia as to the origin of pottery in Northeast India. The shouldered celts of
all varieties, miniature quadrangular celts, and perforated celts of Northeast India again relate
its antiquity with the East Asian and Southeast Asian countries. The lesser known Neolithic
culture of Northeast India was probably influenced by prominent Neolithic cultures of
surrounding regions.
Rice cultivation is one of the main characteristic features of East Asian and Southeast Asian
Neolithic cultures. The most recent theories on the origins of rice cultivation based on
archaeological data, indicate that it originated in East Asia particularly in the Yangtze basin
of China. around 10,000 years B.P. In the Ganga valley of India, the earliest date for rice
cultivation has been cited at around 8,000 years B.P. Hence if we presume that origin of rice
cultivation in Ganga valley was due to the cultural influence of Yangtze basin, we can predict
a date for the origin of rice in Northeast India as it lies between China and the Ganga valley.
Another possibility is the indigenous origin of rice cultivation in the Ganga valley which is a
zone of greater Eastern India including Northeast India. We can not ignore the possibility that
rice cultivation may have originated in this particular region only because of the lack of
evidence of rice in northeast India, as most parts of the river valleys have thick alluvium
deposits which thereby prevent archaeological exploration at great depths.
The Neolithic sites discovered so far are mainly located near areas of high elevation where
shifting cultivation is practiced even today by present day inhabitants and it is likely that the
Neolithic people preferred to locate their settlements near land that was away from the natural
flood calamity of the big rivers like the Brahmaputra and its tributaries and where agriculture
was possible. The distribution pattern of the sites show a preference for the hilly areas of
Meghalaya, Karbi Anglong, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland especially in the
Garo Hills, Khasi Hills, and Naga Hills.
The linguistic similarity between northeast India and East Asia and Southeast Asia reveals an
interesting possibility as to the migration of the Austro-Asiatic and Tibeto-Burman language
families into Northeast India during the Neolithic time. This indicates strong connections
between East Asian and Southeast Asian Neolithic cultures with their counterparts in
Northeast India. The expansion and multiplication of the rice farming communities of these
nearby east Asian regions ultimately introduced rice cultivation into Northeast India. Though,
we have no adequate data for the correlation of rice agriculture with the two early inhabitant
linguistic groups: viz. Austro-Asiatic and Tibeto-Burman, still, on the basis of circumstantial
evidence, it can be inferred that these two groups of people might be responsible for the
introduction of rice in Northeast India. On the basis of the vast amount of Tibeto-Burman
language groups presently inhabiting Northeast India, that outnumber the Austro-Asiatic
group; it is more probable to correlate the former with the early farming communities of the
region. Thus, extensive scientific multi-disciplinary surveys are needed in order to put forth
concrete evidences regarding the Neolithic culture of this region. The cultural process should
be highlighted in relation to the environment and the ecological background, to which the
Neolithic people have adapted their life style .
Acknowledgements
The present work is based on data, collected during the preparation of dissertation for my
Degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Indian History, Culture and Archaeology in Deccan
College, Post-Graduate and Research Institute, India. This modest attempt would not have
been possible without the support, guidance and encouragement extended to me by various
people at various stages. I am ever grateful to my guide Prof. V. S. Shinde, of Deccan
College, who took keen interest in my work, and provided me with valuable advice and
constant guidance. I would like to thank Dr. D. K. Medhi of Gauhati University for his active
guidance and constant care during the preparation of Master dissertation. I wish to thank Dr.
Sheila Mishra of Deccan College, and Prof. Robert Sala and Dr. Xose Pedro Rodriguez
Alvarez of Rovira i virgili University, Spain for reviewing an earlier version of this
manuscript. I am grateful to my friend from Canada Miss Helen Adamson for her kind help
in correcting very meticulously the language. Finally, I would like to thank to all my family
members and fellow friends for their moral support and constant care of me at every level.
North-East Region Traditional Dress
North east region of India consists of the seven states- Arunachal Pradesh, Assam,
Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura- famous by the name of 'seven
sisters'. Along with the scenic beauty of northeastern India, its traditional ethnic clothes
represent the true spirit of India. Although Indian sarees, lehengas and salwar kameez are the
most widely worn dresses in almost whole of India, the vibrant and bright traditional clothing
of the people of North East India, in fact, gives an identity to the Asian fashion worldwide.
Here is a brief account of women's traditional costumes of each of the seven states of north
east India.
Traditional Dresses of Arunachal Pradesh
The traditional women dresses of Arunachal Pradesh have vibrant colors and
myriad patterns that instantly give a feel of their tribe culture. There are many
tribes here and each have a distinct pattern of clothing. The women of Buddhist
Monpas tribe wear a jacket above a sleeveless chemise which is tied to their
waists with a lengthy and narrow strip of cloth in a rounded manner. They wear a
lots of fashion accessories- silver rings, earrings cut from bamboo-bits decorated
with beads or turquoises.
A Naga tribe called Tangsa also lives in Arunachal Pradesh. Women of this tribe wear a very
attractive woven petticoat and a linen blouse. They look like the ancient replica of modern
Indian skirts and shirts. The Miji women wear an ankle-long white cloak and accessorize it
withbig-sized silver earrings and necklaces.
Traditional Dresses of Assam
Assam is well known for its gorgeous Assam silk sarees that include Muga
sarees and Pat sarees. These handloom sarees are the perfect bridal wear
having gold and silver threads embellishment. However, the more
traditional dress of Assamese women is the Mekhla Chador- the three piece
clothing set which resembles the half saree of South India. It consists of a
long skirt type petticoat and a long piece of cloth like saree but not as long
as a sari.
The finely woven Chador or Chaddar is used just like the pallu part of saree by wrapping it
round the Mekhla or the embellished petticoat. A matching blouse accompanies Mekhla
Chador. On the occasion of marriages, the brides of Assam also wear 'Riha' or a short cloth
like scarves which is mainly used for tying the knot with the bridegroom's shawl during the
wedding rituals.
There are many tribes in Assam too. The women of Dimasa tribe wear a skirt-like clothing
which is called 'Rigu' and an embellished vest-like attire called 'Rijamphai', sometimes also
known as 'Rikhaosa'. A Thai Phake tribal woman wears a striped girdle- the 'Chin' that
stretches from waist down to the ankles. She also uses ' Chairchin', a cloth belt to encircle her
waist. She wraps her upper body with a long stripped cloth called 'Fanangwait'. The short
version of this is worn by the young girls which is known as 'Fafek.' They also wear
multicolored blouse called 'Chekhamchum.' Many jewelery accompany these traditional
costumes of Assam which include Khopo Phool- an earring having looks of an orchid; Gaam
Kharu- a gold polished large-sized silver bangle; Lokaporo- gold or ruby or mina or enamel-
plated earring with bird figures; Jethi Poti- a wide band of cloth decorated with tiny
medallions and a pendant at the center- they give The women of Assam a decent and
beautiful appearance.
Traditional Dresses of Manipur
The easy to wear traditional dress of Manipur consists of a shawl known as Innaphi, a wrap
around cloth Phanek and a stiff skirt type clothing called sarong. The Phanek is usually worn
with a blouse and an upper cloth which is worn like a mini saree. With the spread of
Christianity here, the young Manipuri girls like to wear jeans and tops or shirts. However,
they also wear the modified versions of their traditional attire.
For example, the Innaphis worn by Manipuri women are much similar to
the modern wrap around skirt. The women of Manipur wear different
clothes at different festivals. For example, on the occasion of Rasa Leela
festivals, they wear the Potlois and Kumins. Koks an Phurits etc. are worn
during the dance based festivals. Different tribes of Manipur have their
own distinctive dresses like Lmaphie, Saijounba, Ningthoupee and Phiranji. The dress called
oirang Phi' is worn like as a saree by many women across India.
When they go out of their homes, they use its longer version. A Garo
woman also wears blouse and an unstitched 'lungi' like cloth which is
known as 'Dakmanda.' It is fastened around the waist. It has a six to ten
inch broad borders decorated with attractive motifs or floral patterns.
The traditional costume of the Khasi women consists of a Jainsen which touches the ankles
and a blouse above that. A khasi woman ties the edges of 'tap-moh khlieh' which is a
checkered cotton shawl, round her neck or pin it up at the shoulders. It performs as an apron.
On festive occasions, she also wears 'Ka Jainsem Dhara'- a long piece of Assam Muga silk. A
senior khasi woman wear a strip of woolen cloth called 'Jainkup'.
The women of Jaintia tribe wears a velvet blouse along with a sarong called 'Thoh Khyrwang'
which is wrapped around the waist. A long Assam Muga silk cloth is tied round shoulders
which flows down to the ankles. A Jaintia woman covers her head with a head accessory
which is a cloth-piece with checks called 'Kyrshah'. Women of all the tribes of Meghalaya
love to wear ornaments made of gold and silver.
It has many varieties such as `Chapchar Kut`, `Mim Kut` and `Pawl Kut`.
Puanchei has two parts- a straight long skirt type clothing and a shirt or top
that is worn above it. They are traditionally bright in color with checkered
patterns. The headdress, worn during dances, is the most attractive feature of
this Mizo Lusei dress. This headgear is made of a coronal which is built
from brass and colored cane. There are porcupine quills on this head dress
and upper edges of these quills are added with green wing-feathers of the common parrot.
Some very attractive blouses are also worn by the women of Mizoram such as Kawrchei and
Ngotekherh. They are usually worn along with `Puanchei` while performing various Mizo
dances.
More recently, the young Tripura women like to wear blouses in place of
Risa but on the occasion of weddings, it is mandatory for them to wear Risa. These women of
Tripura also love to wear different fashion accessories, particularly beads and coin strands
around their necks.
The women of the Lushei tribe wear a dark blue cotton fabric similar to a
skirt or petticoat. It is wrapped around the waist and is held securely by a
corset of brass wire or string. The traditional costumes of the Kuki-Chin
women contain patterns which look like the hide of snakes. These dresses
are known by different names like Thangang, Saipi-khup, Ponmongvom,
and Khamtang. Historically these clothes were worn by women of
aristocratic families.
For men, traditional clothes are thekurta. In south India men wear long, white sheets of cloth.
In north Indian languages like Hindi, Marathi and Oriya these are called dhoti, while in Tamil
they are called veshti. Over the dhoti, men wear shirts, t-shirts, or anything else.
In addition it is the usual dress which consists of a loin-cloth, a short-sleeved coat, and a
sword slung on the right side, a leather bag slung on the left side and a few bead-necklaces,
the priest wears a few other articles. These articles are an apron with particular designs, a
head-band decorated with two or three rows of cowries, a necklace studded with the teeth of
tiger and bear and a few metal bells. A priestess wears these special articles in addition to the
usual Mishmi woman's dress of a skirt, a long sleeved coat and bead-necklaces. The priestess
is generally accompanied by female dancers. The accompanying dancers wear the usual
dress. The dancers stand in a line, the priest is second either from the right or left. During the
dance, one dancer standing at one end of the line plays a small drum slung from his neck. The
priest and the other two dancers play a very small semi-globular single-membrane drum,
striking it with a bamboo-stick which is kept tied to the drum with a string.
The fifth dancer, if any, plays a horn bugle. When there are five dancers, the priest stands in
the middle of the line. He sings a line of invocatory song while all the others play the musical
instruments, flex the knees bobbing up and down and alternately raise the right and left heels
and stamp these on the ground in time to the drum-beats. When the priest finishes singing the
line, others repeat it in chorus. Again the priest sings another line of the song which the
others repeat in chorus and thus it goes on.
Dances of Assam
Bihu Dances
Bihu is the most popular folk dance of Assam. The
people of Assam are very proud of it and rightly so.
Except Bhangra no other folk dance in India can
compete with the rythmic exuberance of Bihu. Bihu
dances performed by young boys and girls
characterised by brisk stepping, flinging and flipping
of hands and swaying of hips represents youthful
passion, reproductive urge and 'Joie-de-vivre'.
Satriya Nritya
Satriya, The Beautiful Classic Dance of Assam. During winter (November- February) the
best place to see the Satriya dance is Guwahati. A tourist to Assam during winter would do
well to find out if their visits coincide with the annual Satriya Dance festival organised by
one of the following institutions : Puspanjall Cultural Academy, Sangeet Satra, Srimanta
Sankardev Sangha and Satra Mahasabha. The Satriya Dance festival organised by these
institutions would normally have all the facts of this dance including Dhemalis by Goyan
Bayans. Apart from this, many institutions show Satriya Dance on the make shift open stages
during Bihu festival (April May) The lively and colourful folk dances of Assam
Developed by a well known Satriya artist, Narahari Burha Bbakat, Bhor Tal Nritya is an
extension of Sankari culture. Six to ten dancers equipped with cyrnbols perform this dance to
the first bit of '7hiya Nom" and pro- duces a good number of attractive formations displaying
the cymbols. The dance can be seen during festive occasions in and around Barpeta and
Guwahati.
In the passage of more than a hundred years of their settlement in Assam the tea tribes have
developed a synthesised form of dance called "Chah Baganar Jumur Nach". (Jumur dance of
tea garden). This dance is performed by girls and boys together, sometimes by the girls alone,
with precision of foot work while clasping tightly each others waist. This is a beautiful dance
to watch. A visitor to any tea gardens can easily see this dance.
Bodo's Bagurumba
Bodo community has many folk dances to boast. Among them the best and the most
attractive is the Bagurumba dance. This is mainly a formation dance with slow steps and
outstretched hands. About a score of girls dressed in most colourful attire perform this dance
to the accompany- merit of Bodo traditional musical instruments. A tourist in Assam can see
this dance in the Bodo inhabited areas of Kokrajhar, Bongaigaon, Nalbari, Darrang and
Sonitpur districts.
Mishing community of Assam has a festival caged All Ai Ligang in which they
perform dances for making an offering to their deities. Mishing's B;ihu can be
seen in North Eastern part of Assam i.e. Sonitpur and Lakhimpur districts.
Manipuri dance is one of the major Indian classical dance forms. It originates from Manipur,
a state in north-eastern India on the border with Myanmar (also known as Burma). In
Manipur, surrounded by mountains and geographically isolated at the meeting point of the
orient and mainland India, the form developed its own specific aesthetics, values,
conventions and ethics. The cult of Radha and Krishna, particularly the raslila, is central to its
themes but the dances, unusually, incorporate the characteristic cymbals (kartal or manjira)
and double-headed drum (pung or Manipuri mridang) of sankirtan into the visual
performance.
Manipuri dancers do not wear ankle bells to accentuate the beats tapped out by the feet, in
contrast with other Indian dance forms, and the dancers' feet never strike the ground hard.
Movements of the body and feet and facial expressions in Manipuri dance are subtle and aim
at devotion and grace. The traditional Manipuri dance style embodies delicate, lyrical and
graceful movements. The aim is to make rounded movements and avoid any jerks, sharp
edges or straight lines. It is this which gives Manipuri dance its undulating and soft
appearance. The foot movements are viewed as part of a composite movement of the whole
body. The dancer puts his or her feet down, even during vigorous steps, with the front part
touching the ground first. The ankle and knee joints are effectively used as shock absorbers.
The dancer’s feet are neither put down nor lifted up at the precise rhythmic points of the
music but rather slightly earlier or later to express the same rhythmic points most effectively.
The musical accompaniment for Manipuri dance comes from a percussion instrument called
the Pung, a singer, small cymbals, a stringed instrument called the pena and wind instrument
such as a flute. The drummers are always male artistes and, after learning to play the pung,
students are trained to dance with it while drumming. This dance is known as Pung cholom.
The lyrics used in Manipuri are usually from the classical poetry of Jayadeva, Vidyapati,
Chandidas, Govindadas or Gyandas and may be in Sanskrit, Maithili, Brij Bhasha or others.
Meghalaya dance forms an integral part of the culture of Meghalaya. The festivities in
Meghalaya seem to be incomplete without dancing and music.
Dance in Meghalaya forms an important part of the Meghalayan society: birth, marriage,
annual festivals, etc. They seem to be incomplete without the dance performances. Moreover,
the dance at Meghalaya is performed at every level of the society, be it Shnong, Raid or
Hima.