Human Rights Alert: Up Corruption of The Los Angeles Courts by Countrywide and Bank of America

Human Rights Alert
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
11-05-26 Zernik v Melson et al - willful misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon to cover

up corruption of the Los Angeles courts by Countrywide and Bank of America
Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington conducted simulated litigation, as part of a
pattern seen in the US Courts from top to bottom: Refusal to protect the rights of individuals against
rampant corruption of state and US judges in collusion with large corporations and financial institutions.
Corruption of the US justice system is a central cause of the current financial crisis, which is often
overlooked. US Congress should perform its duties.
Richard J Leon, Judge

US District Court, Washington DC
Los Angeles, May 26 - in Zernik v Melson et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff filed a
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties, 28 USC §1361. The petition
pertained to refusal of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the rights of 10 million residents of Los
Angeles County, California, in view of indisputable evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles
Superior Court. [i ]
The case is of particular interest, since it provides direct evidence of the tight links between corruption of the
judiciary, corruption of financial institutions (Countrywide and Bank of America in this case), and patronizing
of the same by FBI and US Department of Justice.
Corruption of the US justice system is a central cause of the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked.
[ii ]
The evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court is indisputable
The petition pertained to allegations of long-term, widespread corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles
County, California, and refusal of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the Human
Constitutional and Civil Rights of residents of that region of the USA. [ iii ]
The evidence of racketeering by Judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court is indisputable:
• Retroactive immunities (“pardons”) were signed for all judges and commissioners of the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles County, California, who had taken “not permitted”
payments (“bribes”). [iv ]
• United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) issued an official Staff Report referring to “corruption
of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [v ] The
report was based on evidence submitted to the HRC of large-scale false imprisonments and
financial/real estate fraud by judges of the Court.
• The International Criminal Bar posted a complaint for racketeering against the Los Angeles Superior
Court. [vi ]
z Page 2/5 May 26, 2011
• Large-scale fraud was opined in Sustain, the case management system of the Los Angeles Superior
Court, which enables the conduct of simulated litigation of cases in violation of the law. The opinion
was supported by opinion of international computer science scholar. [vii ]
• Fraud was opined in the case management system of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, which
enables large-scale false imprisonments, with no legal foundation. The opinion was reviewed and
published in an international computer science journal with an Editorial Board listing scholars from
six European nations and Canada. [viii ]
Financial institutions are the beneficiaries, and FBI and US Department of Justice are the patrons
The two US officers of the US Department of Justice, who were named first among Respondents were:
• Director of US Attorneys Office Kenneth Melson, and
• Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations Kenneth Kaiser.
Other named among Respondents included:
• SEC officers and
• Bank of America Corporation executives.
Key part of the evidence pertained to fraud by Bank of America and Countrywide in the courts in Los
Angeles County, California, and beyond, even prior to the current financial crisis. [ix ]
Brief Chronology of Zernik v Melson et al
The case was assigned to US Judge RICHARD LEON, who engaged in “Simulated Litigation” in collusion
with the Clerk of the Court NANCY MAYER-WHITTINGTON in disregard of First Amendment and Due
Process rights: [x ]
• Complaint (Dkt #01) [xi ] – typically the complaint is a short document. Here the complaint is
voluminous, since it included substantial part of the evidence. Based on Petitioner’s prior experience
in the US courts, it was likely that further evidence would be excluded from the docket. Filing the
evidence with the Complaint ensured its entry into the public record.
• Summonses (Dkt #none) – were not docketed, in apparent violation of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, setting the litigation as Simulated Litigation from the start.
• Motion for CM/ECF Password (Dkt #02) [xii ] – filed together with the complaint. Denial of access
to electronic filing by pro se plaintiffs enables the abuse of rights. Access to the electronic
authentication records (NEFs) in this case is denied to this date.
• Statement of Disqualification of Judge Leon (Dkt #03) [xiii ] and Motion to compel FBI and US
Department of Justice to provide the then imprisoned Richard Fine pen and paper (Dkt #4) [xiv ]
– the two records were included in the docket only after protests pertaining to dishonest conduct of the
court. (see, below).
Former US Prosecutor Richard Fine was at that time held in solitary confinement with no valid legal
papers for his arrest and imprisonment. He was denied access to pen and paper, in effort to prevent
him from filing his habeas corpus petition. Fine had exposed and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles
judges of “not permitted” payments (“bribes”), which required the signing of “retroactive immunities”
(“pardons”) for all such judges. [xv ]
• Evidence of corruption of the Courts in cases involving Countrywide and Bank of America
(Dkt #none) [ xvi ] – eight (8) records were duly filed on May 21, 2009. Judge Leon held the
papers in chambers and refused to permit their docketing.
z Page 3/5 May 26, 2011
• Request for review of conduct of the clerk (Dkt #5) [ xvii ] and Request for statement on the
record by Judge Leon and Clerk Whittington (Dkt #6) [ xviii ]– were filed in protest of denial
of right to file papers in court.
• Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Richard Leon (Dkt #7,8) [xix ,xx ] – were mailed
with no authentication (NEF – notice of electronic filing) and therefore cannot be deemed valid court
records (see below).
• “Leave to File Denied” (Dkt #none) – later, Petitioner received by mail the face pages of his eight
papers, which were never docketed, with hand inscriptions “Leave to file denied, RJL”. [xxi ]
• Request for Authentication Records (NEFs) (Dkt # 9) [ xxii ] – Judge Leon never ruled on the
request, and access to the authentication records has been denied to this date.
Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the same conduct in a case pertaining to Judge
Olinda Evans, US Court, Northern District of Georgia
In Windsor v Evans et al (1:10-cv-00197) in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff William
Windsor filed complaint under cause of actions of Deprivation of rights under the color of law, 42 USC
§1983, pertaining to conduct of US Judge Olinda Evans of the US District Court, Northern District of
Georgia. [xxiii ]
The case is of particular interest, since it provides evidence of cover up of judicial corruption, not only by
Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court in Washington DC, but also by the US courts of appeals and the
US Supreme Court. [xxiv ]
The evidence shows that Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the exact same conduct in
Windsor v Evans et al [xxv ] and in Zernik v Melson et al – denial of the right to file papers in the court.
Invalid electronic systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF) are germane to such conduct
The PACER docket and other reports in this case provide additional evidence of the conduct of
Simulated Litigation: [xxvi ]
• No event is listed in the Calendar of the Court,
• No Judgment is listed in the Judgment Index of the Court,
• The Petition is not listed as “terminated” in the Related Transaction Report, although the case is
listed as closed.
Reports regarding fraud in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF have been previously
published in the National Law Journal [ xxvii ] and in an international, peer-reviewed computer science
journal with Editorial Board naming scholars from six European nations and Canada. [ xxviii ]
Request was also submitted to Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler, an expert on computers and the
law, to review the evidence. [ xxix ]
US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.
The case of Zernik v Melson et al, and other similar cases in the US district courts, US courts of appeals, and
Supreme Court of the United States document that the US courts have effectively established a policy,
prohibiting the filing of papers, which document judicial corruption. [xxx ]
US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.
US Congress should perform its duties.
LINKS
z Page 4/5 May 26, 2011
i
11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other PACER reports in Simulated
Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/55231462/H
ii
11-04-21 "In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures" - Because of widespread corruption of the justice system, they are effectively
immune…
[ii] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) - in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh. Countrywide's
Three "Recreated Letters" and a Transcript
iii
11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take
Action
11-05-15 Racketeering complaint against David Pasternak and the Los Angeles Superior Court posted by the International Criminal Bar (ICB);
international criminal indictment more likely against Rampart Judge Jacqueline A Connor.
iv
09-02-14 California Senate bill providing retroactive immunities ("pardons") for all judges who took "not permitted" payments ("bribes").SBX2-11
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25149045/
v
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights
in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
vi
11-05-15 Racketeering complaint against David Pasternak and the Los Angeles Superior Court posted by the International Criminal Bar
(ICB); international criminal indictment more likely against Rampart Judge Jacqueline A Connor.
vii
09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir's Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles
viii
10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty – Online Public Prisoners’ Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media:
Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
ix
10-05-05 Countrywide, Bank of America [NYSE;BAC], and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
[2] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on
Comptroller of the Currency
[3] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging
Racketeering
x
Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons,
complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of
the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that
the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
xi
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-1) Complaint
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-2) Complaint - Exhibits
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-3) Complaint - Civil Cover sheet
xii
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC:(Dkt #2) Motion for CM/ECF password
xiii
09-05-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #3) Statement for Disqualification of US
Judge Richard Leon
xiv
09-05-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #4) Motion to compel the imprisoned Richard
Fine's First Amendment rights by providing him pen and paper
xv
11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine
xvi
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #1 - Evidence of
corrupt practices by Countrywide and Bank of America in the US Courts - "leave to file denied"
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #2 - Fraud Expert
Opinion Re: Fraud by California Judges in collusion with Countrywide, Bank of America in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles - "leave to file denied"
z Page 5/5 May 26, 2011
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #3 - Requests for
Assistance by Foreign Ambassadors in re: Abuse of Rights in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #4 - Notice filed by
Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to
file denied"
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #5 - Records filed
by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave
to file denied"
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #6 - Additional
Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #7 - Further
Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #8 - Further
Evidence filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
xvii
09-06-03 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #5) Request for review of conduct of the clerk
xviii
09-06-08 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #06) Request for statement on the record by
Judge Richard Leon and Clerk of the Court pertaining to refusal to docket papers filed in court, including statement for disqualification of Judge
Richard Leon.
xix
09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #07) Memorandum Opinion by Judge Richard
Leon
09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #8) Order by US Judge Richard Leon
xx
09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805): Fraudulent “Order” (Dkt #8) mailed by Judge Richard Leon to pro se Plaintiff -s
xxi
09-06-29 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805): Fraudulent papers mailed by Judge Richard Leon to pro se plaintiff, with the inscriptions
“Leave to file denied”.
xxii
09-08-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #9) Ex Parte Request for NEFs (electronic
authentication records) of orders served by the court
xxiii
11-11-12 PRESS RELEASE: Maid of the Mist Corporation Et Al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, et al (1-09-Cv-01543) Simulated Litigation - Fraud
in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
xxiv
11-02-10 Press Release: Fraud Opined in US Supreme Court Records Received by Petitioner William Windsor From the Office of Clerk
Suter
11-01-18 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States and Alleged Corruption of the Office of the
Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States
xxv
11-05-26 Windsor v Evans et al (1:10-cv-00197) in the US Court, District of Columbia - Willful Misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon to
cover up corruption of the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
xxvi
11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other fraudulent PACER reports in
Simulated Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
xxvii
10-10-11 in GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality - The National Law Journal
xxviii
Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring,
Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
xxix
11-04-27 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler is Provided With Additional Evidence of Large-scale Computer Fraud
in the US Courts
xxx
10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to
File Petitions

Human Rights Alert: Up Corruption of The Los Angeles Courts by Countrywide and Bank of America

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Human Rights Alert: Up Corruption of The Los Angeles Courts by Countrywide and Bank of America

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

11-05-26 Zernik v Melson et al - willful misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon to cover

Richard J Leon, Judge

You might also like