Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This lab is broken up into two parts: Part 1 involves determining the shrinkage rate of different
polymers that are commonly injection molding into parts in the AML, and Part 2 involves
performing a paper design of an injection molding tool set and process. First, general
background information and manufacturing science dealing with the injection molding process
will be presented.
Injection Molding
Injection molding uses high pressure to deliver a metered amount of heated and
plasticized thermoplastic into a relatively cold mold, which solidifies the plastic material. The
process is shown schematically in Figure 1.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1 – (a) Cutaway view of an injection molding machine
[www.xcentricmold.com/images/injection-molding-machine.gif] and (b) details of the injection
molding cycle [www.milmour.com/milmour/injection_molding_images.asp].
Table 1 – Common Linear Shrinkage Values (S) For Various Thermoplastics (from
www.gepolymerland.com/research/tech/tip97dec.html)
Material Shrinkage (S) in inches/inch (per
ASTM D955)
ABS- High Impact .005 - .007
ABS- Medium Impact .005 - .008
ABS-High Heat .004 - .006
ACETAL .020 - .035
ACRYLIC- General Purpose .002 - .009
ACRYLIC- High Flow .002 - .007
ACRYLIC- High Heat .003 - .010
ACRYLIC- Impact .004 - .008
NYLON- 6,6 .010 - .025
NYLON- 6 .007 - .015
NYLON- Glass Reinforced .005 - .010
POLYCARBONATE .005 - .007
POLYESTER .025 - .050 thick .006 - .0012
POLYESTER .050 - .100 thick .012 - .017
POLYESTER .100 - .180 thick .016 - .022
POLYETHERIMIDE .005 - .007
POLYETHYLENE- LDPE .015 - .035
POLYETHYLENE- HDPE .015 - .030
POLYPROPYLENE .010 - .030
PPO®/HIPS (NORYL®) .005 - .007
POLYSTYRENE- Crystal .002 - .008
POLYSTYRENE- Impact .003 - .006
POLYURETHANE .010 - .020
PVC-RIGID .002 - .004
PVC-FLEXIBLE .015 - .030
SAN .002 - .006
To compensate for shrinkage, the cavity dimensions of an injection mold must be made
larger than the specified part dimension. The dimension of the cavity is then
where: Dc = dimension of cavity and Dp = molded part dimension. For example, if the length of
an injection molded polypropylene part is 5.0 inches, the corresponding cavity dimension using
the preceding equation and assuming a linear shrinkage value of 1.0% is 5.05 inches.
Since the mold is almost always heated, it experiences an expansion from room
temperature. Hence, the room temperature dimensions (Dca) of the mold must also compensate
for this expansion (i.e. be slightly undersized) using
where: α = coefficient of thermal expansion of tool material, Tmold = mold temperature, and
Tambient = ambient temperature.
It is clear that a mold shape must be designed for each combination of polymer to be injected and
the mold material. However, the mold dimensions calculated using S values from Table 1 and
the Dc and Dca equations above represent a gross simplification of the part shrinkage issue.
There are number of process factors that affect shrinkage, any of which change the amount of
contraction experienced by a particular polymer. The most important factors and affect they
have on part shrinkage are given below.
• Injection pressure – higher pressure forces more material into the mold cavity and
shrinkage is reduced.
• Compaction time – assuming polymer in the gate does not freeze, more compaction time
allows more material to be forced into the mold cavity while shrinkage is taking place,
thereby reducing shrinkage.
• Melt temperature – higher melt temperatures actually reduce shrinkage, since polymer melt
viscosity is lowered allowing more material to be packed into the mold.
• Part thickness – Thicker parts shrink more, since there is more molten plastic to contract
inside the surface skin formed with thicker sections.
Mold Cycle Time
Mold cycle time can be estimated by considering the various actions that occur during
injection molding, as shown in Figure 1(b), using
,
where: topen/close = time required to open or close the molds before and after part ejection,
respectively; tf = mold fill time including pack and hold; tc = part cooling time after filling mold
with plastic; and te = part ejection time. Both topen/close and te are set at the injection molding
machine based on experience. However, minimum values for tf and tc can be estimated.
For a given flow rate (if not limited by the fluid dynamics of mold filling), the mold fill
time is
where: Vt = total fill volume of the part and runner system and Qt = total volumetric flow rate
from the injection molding machine (not to be confused with Q used for heat required).
Estimating the actual mold fill time, especially for a complicated part shape, will require
sophisticated simulation software such as Moldflow or SimTech, because of the complicated
physics involved (see Figure 2 for behavior of the melt front, for example) and uncertainty about
how long the mold must be packed at high pressure.
Cooling Lines
Melt Front
Velocity Thickness
Frozen Layers Profile
Fountain Flow
Cooling time depends on the maximum wall thickness in the injection molded part. An
estimate of the cooling time require for a part wall of thickness h is given by
where: αd = thermal diffusivity of the melt, Tm = melt temperature (temperature of the molten
plastic during injection) as before, Tmold = mold wall temperature (temperature that mold is
maintained at), and Te = desired ejection temperature of the part. The cooling load, Qcool, for a
heater/chiller unit to maintain the mold at a specific temperature, Tmold, can be estimated using
.
All variables in this equation have been previously defined.
Part Ejection Force
Ejection pins force the part out of the mold after the part has cooled and solidified
enough. As an injection molded part shrinks, it can literally form an interference fit around mold
cores, especially if the part draft angle is not sufficient. The ejection force, Fe, can be estimated
using ,
where: µ = frictional coefficient, p = pressure and A = area at the interference interface.
Specimen Length
Figure 3 – ASTM D638 tensile test specimen being used to measure polymer shrinkage values.
1. Measure the length dimension L in the AML tensile test specimen injection mold. Note
that this dimension will change as the mold is heated up due to the circulating water.
Based on the previous equation, the actual mold cavity length Lc during injection molding
will be Lc = L ⎡⎣1 + α (Tmold − Tambient ) ⎤⎦
where: α = coefficient of thermal expansion for aluminum mold = 12.8×10-6 1/ºF
Tmold = mold temperature in ºF (probably the heating water temperature)
Tambient = ambient temperature of the AML in ºF.
2. For a particular polymer, injection mold 30 standard tensile test specimens using the
AML mold. Measure the lengths of all 30 specimens after they cool to room temperature
using a Vernier Caliper, and calculate the average length Lave and standard deviation σL.
3. Calculate the shrinkage rate for the polymer S using the following equation:
L − Lave
S= c
Lc
5. As a group, submit a 2-3 page memo that describes the results of the shrinkage rate
measurements, discusses the variability in the data as measured in Step 2, and includes all
of the raw measurement data.