Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All stakeholders should be informed of the development of a PID, and the final PID should be
agreed and signed off by the management in municipal partners.
The PID should contain information setting out the "who, what, why, when and how" for the local
pilot. It should define all major aspects of the pilot, and can be used as a key part in the
management of the delivery of the pilot and sets the baselines that will be used in any assessment of
the pilot's success.
All Smart Cities partners are expected to produce a PID for each local pilot. These will be used by the
project and by local partners to measure progress against the aims and objectives set out in each
pilot's PID. Many partners will already be expected to develop PIDs for their pilots: in this case
relevant information should be copied into this form.
2. Pilot information
This section sets out the basic information about your pilot.
Belgium Norway
Germany Sweden
Netherlands UK
• In 2007 the People’s Network project delivered over 400 desktop PCs for use by the
public in 26 libraries across Edinburgh
• The PCs offer common applications (e.g. Microsoft Office software) and filtered access
to the Internet
• Support and maintenance for the service is provided jointly by Equanet and
Virginmedia.
Pilot the addition of wireless access points to the People’s Network, to allow the public
to access the Internet from libraries using their own Wi-Fi-capable devices (laptops,
smart phones etc)
Deliver the technical infrastructure necessary to support a full rollout of wireless
internet to other libraries and (potentially) other Council buildings, provided the pilot is
successful.
3.1. Pilot topics
Select all that apply to your pilot
eProcurement Policy
Infrastructure
Electricity/Gas Tax
Environment Water
Healthcare Other
eInclusion Women
Any citizen
All visitors (must be willing to sign up as ‘guest’ users, must own a Wi-Fi capable device).
Private sector
Non-profit sector
4.1. Objectives
What outcomes should be delivered by the pilot? (Business case/benefits should be set out in
Section 5)
Determine the viability of adding wireless internet access to the People’s Network via a
pilot.
Procure and install the core technical infrastructure necessary to run said pilot and
potentially support a fully rolled-out service.
4.2. Approach
How will the pilot do this?
The Project wil be set up, managed and controlled using PRINCE2 methodology.
The Project will be delivered by the Council and an existing external supplier.
Evaluation criteria for the pilot will be agreed. Supplier will be asked to quote for and install
new infrastructure in three chosen libraries. Pilot will run for three months and be evaluated
on the previously agreed criteria.
4.3. Deliverables
What outputs/processes/procedures/definitions will be delivered by the pilot?
Core wireless infrastructure installed in pilot libraries.
4.4. Exclusions
What issues are outside the scope of the pilot?
The selection of pilot libraries was proposed prior to project start-up in an e-Government
briefing paper dated 09/09/08.
The selection of supplier - Equanet, one of the existing People’s Network suppliers - was
proposed prior to project start-up in an e-Government briefing paper dated 09/09/08.
Any work required to integrate a new People’s Network booking system with the delivered
wireless infrastructure must be scoped as part of the separate Booking System project.
4.5. Constraints
What issues constrain the pilot? (These will include financial, technical, and timing issues.)
Pilot is affordable (within the discretionary e-Government budget for People’s Network
development).
Pilot is designed and scheduled to comply with Service for Communities change and
improvement programmes and the Libraries Transformation Programme.
Pilot is scalable, i.e. rollout is straightforwardly repeatable for remaining Libraries, with
predictable costs.
Pilot does not impair existing People’s Network infrastructure and performance.
Pilot takes place under conditions which allow evaluation against pre-defined criteria.
4.6. Assumptions/dependencies
Set out the assumptions you have made at the beginning of the pilot – particularly if your pilot is
dependent upon other projects/pilots. Identify external factors which may affect the pilot.
Council Information Security policies
Libraries Transformation Programme
Ongoing People’s Network service development and review
People’s Network Booking System project
5. Business case
Set out why your municipality feels the pilot is necessary, what the pilot seeks to achieve, and what
benefits it will deliver. Include how these benefits will be measured (e.g. increased customer
satisfaction, faster processing etc.).
5.1. Summary/overview
The Project Executive / Sponsor roles on the Board include principal senior stakeholders across
Services for Communities and e-Government. These staff will make the final determination as
to the success of the pilot and any recommendations for continuation beyond the pilot period
and/or roll-out to further libraries
Formal Project Board meetings will not be held regularly but will include at least an initial
meeting following the submission of a Purchase Order to the supplier, and a final meeting to
consider the results of the pilot evaluation and make a final determination and
recommendations (and close the project as currently scoped). Additional formal meetings may
be scheduled at the initial meeting if the Board deems it necessary.
Informal project meetings will be held more regularly with the Senior User, Senior Supplier and
associated staff including Libraries Service Development, Libraries site representatives, the
Comms Service, and the Supplier’s technical designers and installation engineers. During the 3-
month pilot period, a number of checkpoints have been defined in the milestone plan which
will require these staff to meet.
7. Staff/financial resources
Set out what resources are available to deliver the pilot. This should include what budget and staff
the pilot can call upon.
The Project Manager will report locally to both the Project Board (including a Senior User and
Project Executive from Libraries) and the PMO. Additional reporting lines to Libraries
Transformation Programme. Interaction with project for libraries booking system.
Increased (above existing average) number of users registering for overall People’s
Network service (from Active Directory server’s user account records)
Increased (above existing average) new library membership directly due to users’ desire for
wireless internet access (from TALIS – the library management system – reports)
Number of users of People’s Network Wireless comparable proportionally with other
Councils (from statistics provided by the other 5 Scottish Councils with an equivalent
service)
No effect on network performance for People’s Network PCs (from network statistics
provided by supplier)
User feed-back more positive than negative (from online user questionnaires with multiple-
choice responses)
Libraries staff feed-back more positive than negative (from online user questionnaires with
multiple-choice responses)
Wireless service meets existing SLAs for People’s Network downtime (from network
statistics provided by supplier and fault calls to supplier logged by SfC Business
Improvement)
Wireless service takes less libraries staff time to support than the PC service (from logs for
user assistance kept by libraries staff during pilot period).
10. Risks
Set out the main risks the pilot faces and what steps you will take to manage these risks.
Main risks were to existing infrastructure (e.g. impairment of performance, downtime). Risks
mitigated by choosing a solution which would be additional to and built around existing
infrastructure, rather than changing that infrastructure.
11. Co-design
Consulted with Glasgow and Ayrshire councils to see how they managed their service (e.g.
provision of central technical support, promotional materials, restrictions on users).