Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper:
Travelling direction
Leg-wheel hybrid locomotion on rough terrain we
propose for a hexapod robot is realized by continu-
ous transition between wheeled and legged locomotion
based on sensor feedback. In basic positioning on a flat
surface, the robot is supported by three legs and moves
using its wheels. Upon sensing an obstacle, the robot’s
support and swing legs change to a tripod gait with an Rough terrain (1) (2)
oval orbit to cross over the obstacle. The maximum Hit!
obstacle height depends on the robot’s height and the
positioning of the foreleg. We analyzed optimal posi-
tioning implemented in the hybrid robot ASTERISK
H, as confirmed by experimental results.
(3) (4)
Keywords: leg-wheel robot, climbing steps, hexapod
Fig. 1. Concept of our research.
robot, rough terrain
1. Introduction 2. Background
Leg-wheel robots provide the advantage of stable, effi- Leg-wheel robots are roughly divided into those with
cient movement over rough terrain in walking and speed- active wheels driven by motors and those with passive
ing over flat terrain on wheels. The ASTERISK H hexa- wheels but no drive sources. Hirose et al.’s Zero Car-
pod leg-wheel robot we propose (Fig. 1) traverses terrain rier [1], a leg-wheel stair climber, featured active wheels
with steps where stable movement is possible by walking at the end of 8 legs able to traverse slopes and kept level by
but not wheels by alternating rolling and walking based sensors, but its ascent and descent were controlled man-
on sensor feedback. When steps are small enough for ually. Miyagi et al.’s leg-wheel chair traversed stairs by
it to roll, it uses its wheels in basic positioning where detecting steps with a camera, demonstrating effective au-
3 of 6 legs provide support and the remaining 3 legs tonomous obstacle recognition in travel over rough ter-
swing. When sensors on support legs detect an obstacle rain [2]. The leg-wheel robot Hylos [3] had 4 legs, each
too large to traverse on wheels, the robot attempts to walk with 2 joints and a wheel with degrees of freedom(DOF)
over the obstacle by switching support and swinging legs. for steering and driving level over rough terrain. Char-
The maximum obstacle height it manages depends on the iotIII [4], developed by Nakajima et al., is a leg-wheel
robot’s height and leg positioning. We analyzed optimal robot using internal sensor information, including joint
positioning for traversing steps and confirmed its feasibil- servo angles, for traversing unknown environments.
ity with leg-wheel hybrid robot ASTERISK H. While active-wheel robots tend to be heavy, passive-
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews wheel robots feature light weight and simple mechanisms.
studies on leg-wheel robots. Section 3 introduces AS- Hashimoto et al. proposed movement using passive wheel
TERISK H and Section 4 discusses leg and wheel obsta- friction in their biped WS-3 [5], but it could not switch
cle management. Section 5 details hybrid locomotion and from wheels to a biped gait or turn and stop, leaving much
how the maximum step height is determined by initial leg to be desired. Hirose et al. realized pedal walking and
positioning. Section 6 summarizes experimental results wheel travel in Roller-Walker [6], a passive-wheel robot
and Section 7 presents conclusions. with its 4 wheels. Traveling by passive wheels was real-
ized by converting axial friction to rotational force. This
robot switches feet and wheels by rotating its 90Æ around
Joint2
(-95 : +95)
Joint3
(-100 : +100)
Joint1 Joint2 Joint3 Joint4
Wheel
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4
Body
Side View
Fig. 2. Leg-wheel type robot “ASTERISK H”. Fig. 3. Configuration of joints of ASTERISK H.