You are on page 1of 2

Hybrid Locomotion of Leg-Wheel ASTERISK H

Paper:

Hybrid Locomotion of Leg-Wheel ASTERISK H


Takenobu Yoshioka , Tomohito Takubo , Tatsuo Arai , and Kenji Inoue
 Department
of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering Science,
Osaka University, 1-3, Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
E-mail: yoshioka@arai-lab.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp
 Department of Bio-System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,

Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jounan, Yonezawa, Yamagata 922-8510, Japan


[Received September 28, 2007; accepted January 24, 2008]

Travelling direction
Leg-wheel hybrid locomotion on rough terrain we
propose for a hexapod robot is realized by continu-
ous transition between wheeled and legged locomotion
based on sensor feedback. In basic positioning on a flat
surface, the robot is supported by three legs and moves
using its wheels. Upon sensing an obstacle, the robot’s
support and swing legs change to a tripod gait with an Rough terrain (1) (2)
oval orbit to cross over the obstacle. The maximum Hit!
obstacle height depends on the robot’s height and the
positioning of the foreleg. We analyzed optimal posi-
tioning implemented in the hybrid robot ASTERISK
H, as confirmed by experimental results.

(3) (4)
Keywords: leg-wheel robot, climbing steps, hexapod
Fig. 1. Concept of our research.
robot, rough terrain

1. Introduction 2. Background

Leg-wheel robots provide the advantage of stable, effi- Leg-wheel robots are roughly divided into those with
cient movement over rough terrain in walking and speed- active wheels driven by motors and those with passive
ing over flat terrain on wheels. The ASTERISK H hexa- wheels but no drive sources. Hirose et al.’s Zero Car-
pod leg-wheel robot we propose (Fig. 1) traverses terrain rier [1], a leg-wheel stair climber, featured active wheels
with steps where stable movement is possible by walking at the end of 8 legs able to traverse slopes and kept level by
but not wheels by alternating rolling and walking based sensors, but its ascent and descent were controlled man-
on sensor feedback. When steps are small enough for ually. Miyagi et al.’s leg-wheel chair traversed stairs by
it to roll, it uses its wheels in basic positioning where detecting steps with a camera, demonstrating effective au-
3 of 6 legs provide support and the remaining 3 legs tonomous obstacle recognition in travel over rough ter-
swing. When sensors on support legs detect an obstacle rain [2]. The leg-wheel robot Hylos [3] had 4 legs, each
too large to traverse on wheels, the robot attempts to walk with 2 joints and a wheel with degrees of freedom(DOF)
over the obstacle by switching support and swinging legs. for steering and driving level over rough terrain. Char-
The maximum obstacle height it manages depends on the iotIII [4], developed by Nakajima et al., is a leg-wheel
robot’s height and leg positioning. We analyzed optimal robot using internal sensor information, including joint
positioning for traversing steps and confirmed its feasibil- servo angles, for traversing unknown environments.
ity with leg-wheel hybrid robot ASTERISK H. While active-wheel robots tend to be heavy, passive-
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews wheel robots feature light weight and simple mechanisms.
studies on leg-wheel robots. Section 3 introduces AS- Hashimoto et al. proposed movement using passive wheel
TERISK H and Section 4 discusses leg and wheel obsta- friction in their biped WS-3 [5], but it could not switch
cle management. Section 5 details hybrid locomotion and from wheels to a biped gait or turn and stop, leaving much
how the maximum step height is determined by initial leg to be desired. Hirose et al. realized pedal walking and
positioning. Section 6 summarizes experimental results wheel travel in Roller-Walker [6], a passive-wheel robot
and Section 7 presents conclusions. with its 4 wheels. Traveling by passive wheels was real-
ized by converting axial friction to rotational force. This
robot switches feet and wheels by rotating its 90Æ around

Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics Vol.20 No.3, 2008 403


Yoshioka, T., et al.

Joint1 (-75 : +75)


[deg]

Joint4 (-120 : +120)

Joint2
(-95 : +95)

Joint3
(-100 : +100)
Joint1 Joint2 Joint3 Joint4

Wheel
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4
Body
Side View
Fig. 2. Leg-wheel type robot “ASTERISK H”. Fig. 3. Configuration of joints of ASTERISK H.

Table 1. Specifications of ASTERISK H.


has legs in 6 directions disposed radially from the center,
Dimensions 815 706 85 mm provides working space and traveling capability in all di-
Dimensions rections. The vertical symmetry of ASTERISK H (Fig. 2,
(Home Position) 620 537 334 mm
Table 1) provides equal workability for upper and lower
Leg Length 330 mm limbs and its predecessor’s integrated limbs and isotropic
Motor Dynamixel DX-117 design.
RS485 : Providing each leg with 4 joints (Fig. 3) enables the
Signal Communication Max Baud Rate 1Mbps robot to select leg positioning and steering angle for om-
Weight 3.4 kg nidirectional movement. Wheels on legs are active and
OS NetBSD motor-driven, with encoders on axes providing rotational
Running Speed 30 cm/s information. Servomotors provide torque information.
Combining encoder and torque information enables the
robot to detect the surface on which it moves. Servomo-
tors and sensors are wired and powered by a daisy chain
its ankles, indicating that traveling by wheels and gait by via RS485 and controlled by a built-in CPU card.
legs are completely separated in the concept. The leg-wheel hybrid locomotion we propose does not
Adachi et al. developed Walk’n Roll, having both ac- rely on friction, which may vary, but uses sensors to de-
tive and passive wheels [7] and 2 passive-wheel front legs tect load variations in supporting legs encountering steps
with 3 DOF and 2 active-wheel back legs with 1 DOF. The and generates gait movement to traverse obstacles. Its tri-
passive wheels incorporate a lock and the robot moves pod gait is typical for hexapod robots, enabling fast, stable
in 3 modes based on the environment – wheel, hybrid, traversal of objects.
and step. Yoneda et al. proposed semierect movement for
traversing rough terrain by a leg-wheel hybrid quadruped
robot [8] that used instructions from an operator for mov-
ing the center of gravity (COG) when stepping over ob-
4. Leg-Wheel Object Traversal
jects; it was thus unable to achieve fully autonomous
4.1. Leg Action
movement using sensor information.
The complexity of leg-wheel robot mechanics has Leg robots are statically stable when a vertical line
caused research to focus on mechanisms and movement from the COG goes through the polygon formed by sup-
rather than on hybrid leg-wheel locomotion using sensor porting legs. The tripod gait is static, but we evaluated
information. We propose hybrid rough-terrain locomotion object traversal using a normalized energy stability mar-
alternating legs and wheels based on sensor information, gin [10], which is a robot walking stability index focusing
and demonstrate that movement suitable in given environ- on mechanical energy and consider movement stability on
ments can be generated automatically. rough terrain including steps.
The traversal performance we require is such that it
travels over steps that wheels cannot manage, i.e., steps
3. ASTERISK H higher than the robot’s wheel radius. We confirmed that
ASTERISK H traversed steps over twice the height of the
The integrated limb mechanism robot ASTERISK, wheel radius.
having both arm and leg functions [9], moves efficiently
by selecting functions based on the environment and en-
ables components to be downsized through function inte- 4.2. Wheel Action
gration. Integration involves isotropic leg design for leg Under conditions required to traverse a step using a
arrangement of the robot. The developed robot, which wheel (Fig. 4) let us use a model in which angle θ formed

404 Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics Vol.20 No.3, 2008

You might also like