Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The effect of clear-cutting and liming on abundance, dominance structure and trophic composition of the soil macrofauna
(Lumbricidae, Diptera, Coleoptera and Chilopoda) was studied in a beech wood forest on an acidic brown-earth. Sampling
methods were ground photo-ecledors and funnel extraction. The various taxa and nutritional groups of Diptera responded
differently to the environmental changes caused by clear-cutting and liming. The same was true for the species and taxa of
Coleoptera. Lumbricidae and Chilopoda were favoured by the liming treatment. The factors determining the change in
population densities are discussed. Abiotic factors, especially soil moisture, and biotic factors, such as dead plant biomass
and predation, are considered to be of prime importance. A change of moder soil into mull soil after liming is observed.
2.1. Site
Table 1
pH and element concentrations of the organic horizons O,, Or and 0, in the beech forest stand, the unlimed and the limed clear-cut plots
Horizon pH (CaCl,) P K Ca Mg
k, iz8 (mg g-l) (mg g-l) (mg g-l) (mg g-l)
Unlimed clear-cut
0, 3.42 b 43.3 1.72 0.94 1.83 3.92 b 1.11
Of 2.81 b 34.1 ab 1.93 ab 0.95 1.37 b 2.31 b 0.97 b
Oh 2.72 b 31.3 1.71 1.15 a 3.65 1.07 b 1.86 ab
Limed clear-cut
0, 4.79 a 41.5 1.58 0.98 2.24 7.08 a 2.18
0‘ 4.11 a 34.2 b 1.60 b 0.84 2.91 a 12.16 a 4.89 a
Oh 3.38 a 30.6 1.62 0.69 b 3.16 3.39 a 3.89 a
Figures sharing the same letter are not significantly different (Wilcoxon-test at P < 0.05) (Bauhus, 1994).
alis acetoselh L. By contrast, the unlimed plots were 2.3.3. pH and element fluxes
sparsely covered with herbs (2-20%). pH, element concentrations and element exchange
Leaf litterfall into the clear-cuts from the sur- capacity are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
rounding beech trees amounted to 75% of the litter- In the beech forest stand negligible amounts of
fall in the beech forest (2.9 t ha-‘). Total litter input nitrate were measured in the seepage water at 80 cm
in limed clear-cuts increased, because on these plots depth (Bauhus and Bartsch, 1995). Here sulphate and
an additional 2.8 t ha-’ of organic dry matter was aluminium were the dominant ions in the seepage
supplied by the above ground herbaceous vegetation water. In the clear-cut plots disruption of plant up-
(Bauhus and Bartsch, 1995). take and high infiltration rates in the unlimed clear-
2.4. Sampling of the fauna Funnel extraction method (mean of four sampling dates 1992). ;
between 0 and 1 ind. m-l found.
nutrients, such as N and P, did not significantly emergence abundance value of 4114 Diptera rnm2.
increase in the clear-cuts (Tables 1 and 2). Of these 3.3% were Brachycera. Sciaridae were pre-
The occurrence of Lumbric~ eiseni (Lev.) is dominant, comprising 77.9% (3205 ind. me21 of the
worth mentioning. This species is very rare in Ger- total catch, followed by Sciophilidae with a percent-
many. Lumbricus eiseni was found only on the age of 9.5% of the total catch (390 ind. ms2>.
limed plots (both forest plots and clear-cut plots). Cecidomyiidae (including Lestremiinae) comprised
We cannot imagine how this population has colo- 7.1% (292 ind. mp2) of the total catch of Diptera.
nized these plots. Hovemeyer (1991) pointed out that, in acidic beech
woods, Sciaridae are usually more abundant than
3.2. Diptera Cecidomyiinae. The high emergence abundance of
Species belonging to 33 families of Diptera were Chironimidae on the unlimed clear-cut plots, found
found. Of these, 14 belonged to Nematocera and 19 in this study, could possibly be attributed to the fact
to Brachycera. that the emergence abundance of Diptera is subject
The average emergence abundance of Diptera was to fluctuations from year to year (e.g. Altmtiller,
2600 ind. m- 2. The lowest density (1027 ind. mm21 1979).
was recorded on an unlimed clear-cut plot. The Despite the fact that the dominance structure of
highest density (5051 ind. rnp2) was recorded on a the dipterous community varied greatly between the
limed clear-cut plot. Of the total catch 7% were experimental plots, no pattern became evident. Chi-
Brachycera. ronomidae were an exception, since the dominance
The most abundant taxa were Cecidomyiinae position of Chironomidae on the two unlimed beech
(28.7-64.3% of the total catch), Sciaridae (20.1- forest plots was relatively high. However, it is not an
33.8%) and Chironomidae (1.9-17.5%) (Table 4). increase of Chironomidae, but rather the reduced
On all but one plot, Cecidomyiinae were predomi- emergence abundance values of Cecidomyiinae, on
nant, followed by Sciaridae. On the unlimed clear-cut these plots that could be the explanation for this
plots, Chironomidae were relatively dominant com- finding.
prising 17.5% of the total catch. In Table 5, only those Diptera taxa are listed
On an area of beech forest adjacent to the site where the statistical test revealed significant differ-
examined in this study, Altmiiller (1976) found an ences in the emergence abundance between the treat-
Table 4
Cumulative emergence abundance of Diptera (ind. m -‘) and percentage of taxa of the total catch of the respective plot (%, mean values of
two plots) on the limed and unlimed clear-cut and beech forest plots in the Solling mountains (1992/1993) (catches of ground
uhoto-eclectors)
1
Only taxa which comprised at least 1% of the total catch on at least one plot are presented. +, numbers < 1%.
40 A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51
Table 5 0.01) (Fig. 2(a)). The same result was obtained for
Taxa of Diptera whose emergence abundance was significantly Cecidomyiinae, which made up 50% of Diptera (P
influenced by the factors of clear-cutting and/or liming (ANOVA)
< 0.01). During the year under observation, two
Taxon Factor Effect Significance emergence peaks of Cecidomyiinae were recorded:
Cecidomyiinae the first in April, the second between the beginning
Total Liming X clear-cutting + r f
- L* * of June and the end of August (Fig. 2(b)). During the
First peak Clear-cutting
Second peak Liming Xclear-cutting + - * * second peak, the highest number of Cecidomyiinae
.I* were detected on the limed clear-cut plots (P <
Ceratopogonidae Clear-cutting +
,.
Dolichopodidae Clear-cutting + 0.001). The April catches were significantly higher
Empididae Liming -
I * * on the beech forest plots, in comparison to the
Fanniidae Liming +
t .I clear-cut plots (P < 0.0011. The reduced emergence
Limoniidae Clear-cutting +
Limoniidae Liming +
*.* characteristic for the first peak on the clear-cut plots
Lonchopteridae Liming Xclear-cutting + * * * is difficult to interpret. The larvae of the Cecidomyi-
. * *
Scatopsidae Liming + inae present are assumed to be gall-making. In au-
4*
Sciaridae Liming + tumn the larvae, inside the leaves, fall to the ground
X , interaction of the factors; + / - , positive/negative effect on and enter the soil for aestivation and/or hibernation.
the emergence abundance. * * *P < 0.001, * * P < 0.01, ’ P < Since all experimental plots had roughly the same
0.05. amount of litter, the decline in the emergence abun-
dance on the clear-cut plots can not be attributed to a
reduced litter biomass. One possible explanation for
ments. The emergence abundance value of total the decline in Cecidomyiinae on the clear-cut plots
Diptera was significantly higher on the two limed could be, that, for some reason, the adult Cecidomyi-
clear-cut plots, compared to the other plots (P < inae avoid the edges of the clear-cuts for oviposition.
Ind /m;
4oc0,
b) Cecidomyiinae
3000
2000
1000
0L -
Ei Nemalocera 0 Brachycera
d) microhumiphagous
Diptera
Fig. 2. Emergence abundances and/or activity density of the soil macrofauna (ind. m-‘) on limed and unlimed clear-cut plots, and on
limed and uniimed beech forest plots in the Solling mountains, sampled with ground photo-eclectors. Capture period 11 March to 4
November 1992. cl noli, clear-cut, not limed, cl li, clear-cut, limed; fo noli, beech forest, not limed; fo li, beech forest, l&ted.
A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51 41
3.2.1. Trophic groups of Diptera Similar patterns were observed for the tipulid larvae
In order to point out functional aspects, catches of collected by funnel extraction. The highest number
Diptera were subdivided into trophic groups, accord- of tipulid larvae were found on the limed plots,
ing to the feeding habitats of their larvae. The arti- ranging from 8 to 13 ind. m-‘. On the four unlimed
cles by Brauns (19541, Raw (19671, Hennig (19681, plots 2-7 ind. me2 were found.
Healey and Russel-Smith (19711, Jacobs and Renner The increase in macrohumiphagous feeders on the
(1988) and Hovemeyer (1985, 1992) were helpful limed plots could be attributed to the relatively high
literature for this categorization. biomass of herbs (especially Epilobium angusti-
The statistical analysis for mycetophagous feeders folium), which served as food resource for the
(Platypezidae, Mycetophilidae, Sciophilidae and macrohumiphagous feeders. In addition, the rela-
Lestremiinae) revealed no significant differences be- tively high pH value on the limed plots could have
tween the treatments. Okland (1994) compared the favoured the macrohumiphagous feeders, of which
species richness of Mycetophilidae between clear- Tipulidae are known to avoid acidic habitats. Irmler
cuts, managed forest sites, which were clear-cut and Heydemann (1989) found a positive correlation
70-120 years ago, and semi-natural forests (only between the pH value of the soil and the average
selectively cut). The author found no significant population density of tipulid larvae. According to
difference between clear-cuts and managed forest Funke (19911, however, the emergence abundance of
sites; however, the average number of species was Sciaridae did not change significantly after the appli-
significantly higher in semi-natural forests. The au- cation of lime and fertilizer to a spruce forest in
thor concluded that the restoration of a diverse myce- Germany.
tophilid fauna after clear-cutting requires more time According to many authors, macrohumiphagous
than 70-120 years. This view fits to the findings of larvae thrive on moist substrates. Cramer (1968)
the present study, since the beech forest under survey observed this preference in the adults and the larvae
is about 150 years old and the mycetophilid fauna of Tipulidae and Limoniidae. Funke (1991) found
might still be in a developing state. that Limoniidae are most abundant in moist forests.
The necrophagous feeders (Phoridae, Sarcophagi- Hovemeyer (1985) reported a decline in emergence
dae, Sphaeroceridae) were not influenced signifi- abundance of Limoniidae in years following dry
cantly by the treatments clear-cutting and liming. summers. The development of sciarid larvae is
The trophic groups showing differences were favoured by a high moisture content of the litter
macrohumiphages, microhumiphages, ‘surface scrap- layer and the upper soil layers during summer dry-
ers’ and zoophages. ness (Hovemeyer, 1985, 1991). In this study, how-
ever, no positive correlation between the moisture
3.2.1.1. Macrohumiphages. Those taxa which feed content of the habitat and the abundance of macrohu-
on litter (microflora and amorphic humus included) miphagous feeders could be found. Instead, this study
are assigned to the macrohumiphagous feeders. These revealed an increase in the macrohumiphagous
are Limoniidae, Trichoceridae, Tipulidae, Scatopsi- dipteran numbers on the limed plots. On these plots,
dae, Sciaridae, Bibionidae and Psychodidae. the moisture content did not show an increase at a
The emergence abundance of macrohumiphagous depth of 4 cm (the majority of macrohumiphagous
feeders significantly increased after liming (P < dipteran larvae inhabit a depth of about 4 cm;
0.001) (Fig. 2(c)). This was mainly due to an in- Hovemeyer, 1984).
crease in population density of Sciaridae (P < 0.011,
Scatopsidae (P < 0.01) and Limoniidae (P < 0.001) 3.2.1.2. Microhumiphages. Microhumiphages feed on
(Table 5). Besides, limoniid numbers were signifi- microfungi, algae, Testacea and amorphic humus.
cantly higher on the clear-cut plots relative to the Ceratopogonidae and Chironomidae are assigned to
beech forest plots (P < 0.001) (Table 5). the microhumiphagous feeders.
With one exception, no Tipulidae hatched on the The emergence abundances of all microhu-
unlimed plots. The emergence abundance value was miphagous feeders (Ceratopogonidae and Chirono-
2 ind. mm2 on average on the limed clear-cut plots. midae) increased significantly after clear-cutting (P
42 A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51
< 0.05) (Fig. 2(d)). Statistical proof for this pattern populations belonging to these families (Hovemeyer,
could be given for Ceratopogonidae (P < 0.001; 1984), were relatively moist compared to the beech
Table 5), but not for Chironomidae. Liming caused forest plots. During the summer, the water tension in
an increase in the emergence abundance of all micro- the beech forest at a depth of 5 cm reached a value
humiphagous feeders but a decrease on the beech of 600 hPa (J. Bauhus, personal communication,
forest plots. However, the interaction of clear-cutting 1993).
and liming was not significant (P = 0.098).
The significant increase in microhumiphagous 3.2.1.3. ‘Surface scrapers’. The ‘surface scraping’
feeders due to clear-cutting could be attributed to the Diptera feed on microorganisms, pollen and humus
moisture content of the habitat, as Ceratopogonidae material on the leaf surface. The larvae scrape this
and Chironomidae prefer moist habitats. The positive material off the leaf surfaces with their mandibles.
influence of moisture on Ceratopogonidae was Lonchopteridae, Lauxaniidae and Fanniidae belong
pointed out by Feldmann (1992). Hovemeyer (1985) to this feeding group.
reported a positive linear correlation between the The emergence abundance values of the ‘surface
density of ceratopogonid larvae and the relative wa- scrapers’ increased after liming (P < 0.001) (Fig.
ter content of the organic soil layer. Healey and 3(a)). The same is true for Fanniidae (P < O.OOl>,
Russel-Smith (1971) and Heynen (1988) described which comprised 65% of the ‘surface scrapers’. Lon-
the same preference for Chironomidae. It is not chopteridae were significantly more abundant on the
surprising, therefore, that Ceratopogonidae and Chi- limed clear-cut plots compared to all the other plots
ronomidae preferred the clear-cut plots, because here (Tukey’s least significant difference of P < 0.001).
the upper strata of the soil, which are the habitat of Individuals of this family almost exclusively emerged
I
c) totalCoklptera
d) Curculionidae
200 El
102
Fig. 3. Emergence abundances and/or activity density of the soil macrofauna (ind. m -*) on limed and unlimed clear-cut piots, and on
limed and unlimed beech forest plots in the Solling mountains, sampled with ground phot+eclectors. Capture pried 11 Mz&h to 4
November 1992. cl noli, clear-cut, not limed; cl li, clear-cut, limed; fo noli, beech forest, not limed; fo li, beech forest, limed.
A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51 43
from these plots. Emergence abundance values of the ‘surface scrapers’ responded differently to the envi-
Lauxaniidae, however, were comparable for all ex- ronmental changes, caused by clear-cutting and lim-
perimental plots. In summary, every family of the ing.
Table 6
Population density (ind. m-*) of Coleoptera on the limed (li) and unlimed (unli) clear-cut and the limed (li) and unlimed (unli) beech forest
plots in the Solling mountains (1992/1993), mean density of two plots
Photo-eclectors Funnel method
Clear-cut Forest Clear-cut Forest
li unli li unli li unli ii- unli
CARABIDAE
Noriophilus biguttatus CF.1 1 0 0 0
Trechus quadristriatus (Schrk.) 0 1 7 21
Bembidion lampros (Hbst.) 1 0 0 0
Trichocellusplacidus (Gyllenhal) 0 0 5 +
Pterostichus oblongopunctatus CF.1 9 10 4 2.
Pterostichus metallicus CF.1 0 0 0 0
Trichotichnus laeuicollis (Duft.1 0 0 0 0
HYDROPHILIDAE
Megasternum boletophagum Marsh. 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
CATOPIDAE
Nargus wilkini Spence 15 2 7 5 3 4 2 6
Catops longulus Kelln. 0 4 0 0 0 + Cl 0
LIODIDAE
Colenis immunda Sturm 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Agathidium nigripenne F. 0 0 0 1 0 0 + 0
SCYDMAENIDAE
Neuraphes angulatus (MU.) 3 0 1 0 0 + 0 0
Neuraphes sp. 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
PI’ILIIDAE
Acrotrichis sp. 5 7 6 2 14 23 119 22
STAI’HYLINIDAE
PROTEININAE
Proteinus brachypterus F. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Proteinus oualis Er. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
OMALIINAE
Anthophagus angusticollis Mannh. 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0
Phyllodrepa ioptera (Steph.) 6 4 14 9 0 0 0 0
Dropephylla gracilicornis Fairm. 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0
OXYTELINAE
Coprophilus striatulus CF.1 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
STENINAE
Stenus latifions Er. 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
PAEDERINAE
Lathrobium fuluipenne (Grav.) 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 3
Lathrobium brunnipes CF.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0
Lathrobium longulum Grav. 0 0 0 0 + + 0 0
Domene scabricollis (Er.1 1 5 2 1 0 + 11 +
44 A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (I 995) 35-51
Table 6 continued
Photo-eclectors Funnel method
Clear-cut Forest Clear-cut Forest
-
Ii unli Ii unli li unli Ii unli
XANTHOLININAE
Xantholinus fricolor (F.) 1 0 0 0 1 I I
Xantholinus linearis (01.) 0 0 0 + 0 0 0
Othiuspunctulatus (Gze.) 1 1 2 3 3 b 3
Othius myrmecophilus Kiesw. 0 1 1 8 IL! 7 37
STAPHYLININAE
Philontus sp. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quedius mesomelinus (Marsh.) 1 1 s I 0 0 0 0
Quedius fimatus Steph. 0 0 0 0 0 cl + 0
Quedius xanthopus Er. 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0
Quedius uexans Epph. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quedius maurus (Sahlb.) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Quediusfulgidus (F.) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quedius curtipennis Bernh. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Quedius sp. 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0
TACHYPORINAE
Mycetoporus brunneus (Marsh.) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bolitobius exoletus Er. 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0
Tachinus subterraneus CL.) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Tachinw laticollis (Grav.) 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 0
Tachinus marginellus (F.) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tachyporus chrysomelinus L. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PSELAPI-IIDAE
Bryaxis nodicornis (AubC) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Plectophloeus erichsoni (Aubt) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
CANTHARIDAE
Malthodes mysticus Kiesw. 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
CantharisFgurata Mann. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cantharis obscura L. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bhagonycha lignosa (MU) 7 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
Podistra rufotestacea (Letzn.) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Malthodes sp., females 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
ELATEIUDAE
Athous subfkscus F. 3 2 11 19 1 2 3 2
Athous subfkscus, larvae 0 0 0 0 150 168 339 485
BYBRHIDAE
Cytilus sericeus CF.) 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0
NITIDULIDAE
Brachypterus urticae (F.) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Thalycra feruida (Olivier) 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0
Epuraea longula Er. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Epuraea sp. 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0
A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51 4s
Table 6 continued
Photo-eclectors Funnel method
Clear-cut Forest Clear-cut Forest
li unli Ii unli li unli Ii unli
RIIIZOPIIAGIDAE
Rhiwphagus dispar (Payk.) 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rhisophagus ferrugineus (Payk.) 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
CRYPTOPHAGIDAE
Atomaria sp. 2 3 3 2 0 0 2 0
Cryptophagus silesiacus Ganglb. 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
LATI-IRIDIIDAE
Corticaria sp. 1 16 2 3 0 0 1 0
Cartoderema elongata (Curt.) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lathridius nodifer Westw. 8 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
COCCINELLIDAE
Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata CL.1 0 0 0 0 + 0 + 0
Halyzia sedecimguttata (L.) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Coccinella septempunctata L. 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
PY’I’IUDAE
Rhinosimusplanirostris (F.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rabocerus foveolatus (Ljungl 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
MORDELLIDAE
Nassipa rufilabris (Gyll.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCARABAEIDAE
Melinopterus prodromus (Brahm) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
CHRYSOMELIDAE
Batophila sp. 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0
SCOLYTIDAE
Xyloterus domesticus (L.) 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
CURCULIONIDAE
Polydrusus undatus (F.) 2 0 6 5 0 0 0 0
Sitona cambricus Steph. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Strophosoma melanogrammum (F&t.) 1 1 6 14 0 0 1 +
Strophosoma capitatus (Deg.) 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 +
Otiorhynchus singularis CL.) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 +
Phyllobius argentatus (L.) 0 2 so 70 0 0 0 3
Rhynchaenus fagi (L.) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rhinomias forticornis @oh.) 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
Ceutorhynchus quadridens Germ. 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0
Ceutorhynchus erysimi Germ. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acalles camelus (F.) 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1
ASPIDIPIIORIDAE
Aspidiphorus orbiculatus (Gyll.) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLAMBIDAE
Clambus punctulum Beck 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Methods: ground photo-eclectors (capture period 11 March to 4 November 1992) and funnel extraction method (mean of four sampling
dates 1992). +, between 0 and 1 ind. rn-’ found.
46 A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51
By means of artificial trunks, the attraction, which Macroceridae and Keratoplatidae form part of the
tree trunks exert on the soil macrofauna (Chilopoda, zoophages.
Diplopoda, Coleoptera, Dipteral, was examined by Emergence abundance of total zoophagous feed-
Funke and Herlitzius (1984). These authors observed ers was comparable for all experimental plots. With
that Lonchopteridae avoided the artificial trunks. This Empididae and Dolichopodidae, however, a signifi-
finding is consistent with the high number of Lon- cant change became evident: the emergence abun-
chopteridae found on clear-cut plots. dance value for Empididae increased after liming
(P < 0.05; Table 5). Dolichopodid numbers were
3.2.1.4. Zoophages. Rhagionidae, Empididae, Do- significantly higher on the clear-cut plots relative to
lichopodidae, Hybotidae, Pipunculidae, Tachinidae, the beech forest plots (P < 0.01).
Ind lm2
400
a) Lumbricidae
::v
c) Curculionidae
4-
lnd /m”
80
I 1) Lithobiidae
fi0
-
Cl noI1 Cl /I f0 noll f0 I/
Fig. 4. Density of the soil macrofauna (ind. m -2 ) on limed and unlimed clear-cut plots, and on limed and unlimed beech forest plots in the
Soiling mountains, sampled by funnel extraction method (mean of four sampling dates 1992). cl noli, clear-cut, not limed; cl Ii, clear-cut,
limed; fo noli, beech forest, not limed; fo li, beech forest, limed.
A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51 47
tus, Trichocellus placidus and Pterostichus metalli- ground photo-eclectors, whereas the funnel method
cus were most abundant (Table 6). revealed a decline in the population density of
On the limed plots the average density of Cara- Staphylinidae after clear-cutting (P < 0.01) (Fig.
bidae was higher (20 ind. m-* by the funnel method 4(e)). The same response was observed in Aleochari-
and 12 ind. mm2 using ground photo-eclectors) than nae (P < 0.051. Furthermore, the liming treatment
on the unlimed plots (3 and 11 ind. m-‘, respec- caused an increase in the abundance of Aleocharinae
tively) (Fig. 4(d); funnel method only). Similar pat- (P < 0.05). Othius punctulatus presented no evident
terns were observed for the individual species. Of pattern. On the unlimed beech forest plots, the aver-
Trechus quadristriatus on the limed plots, an aver- age density of Othius myrmecophilus was five times
age of 14 and 2 ind. rnm2, respectively, were found, as high (37 ind. m-*) as on the limed beech forest
while on the unlimed plots an average of only 1 and plots (7 ind. rne2). Clear-cutting had a negative
< 1 ind. m-‘, respectively, were found. The abun- effect on the population of Lathrobium fklvipenne.
dance of Trichocellus placidus was highest on the No individual of this species was detected on the
limed clear-cut plots (an average of 3 and < 1 ind. unlimed clear-cut plots. On the limed clear-cut plots,
rnb2, respectively). In the catches with the funnel the abundance of this species was relatively low. On
method, liming had been slightly favourable for the beech forest plots, however, an average of 4 ind.
Pterostichus oblongopunctatus. Furthermore, clear- me2 of Lathrobium jklvipenne were collected. For
cutting had a positive effect on the population den- Lathrobium brunnipes similar patterns were ob-
sity of Pterostichus oblongopunctatus. The average served (Table 61.
density of this species was 3 ind. rn-’ on the Huhta et al. (19671 found an increase in
clear-cut plots and 1 ind. mm2 on the beech forest Staphylinidae soon after clear-cutting, while Szujecki
plots. No tendency was found for this species in the (1971, 1972) reported a decline in Staphylinidae in
samples taken with the ground photo-eclectors. clear-cut areas.
Knie (1975) reported that the density and species
variety of the carabid fauna in the humid and acidic 3.4. Lithobiidae
forests near Bonn (Germany) depend on the amount
of vegetation. He found that a low density of the The average density of Lithobiidae was found to
herb layer caused a decline in species numbers and ~JJ lxveemu 31 ind. me2 (unlimed forest plots) and
an increase in population density. In clear-cuts, where . -2 (limed forest plots) (Table 7). Four
the herb layer was well developed, Knie detected the species were identified, the predominant one being
highest number of species, but only a small popula- Lithobius mutabilis, averaging 18 ind. rn--‘. The
tion density. In the present study, however, no obvi- density of Lithobius curtipes was 15 ind. mm-‘. Just
ous change in species numbers was found. Further- one individual of Lithobius macilentus and one of
more, the population density was highest on the plots Lithobius dentatus were found.
with a dense herb layer (limed plots).
Table I
Population density (ind. mm2 ) of Lithobiws spp. on the limed (Ii)
3.3.4. Staphylinidae and unlimed (unli) clear-cut and the limed (Ii) and unlimed &mli)
The average abundance of Staphylinidae was 114 beech forest plots in the Solliig motintains (1992/1!B3)
ind. me2 (funnel method) (Fig. 4(e)) and 38 ind. Clear-cut Forest -
m-2 (ground photo-eclectors) (not shown). In the
ii----- unli Ii unli
catches using the funnel method, 78% of the
Lithobius curt@ C.L. Koch 17 10 24 9
Staphylinidae were Aleocharinae, 14% were Othius
Lithobius mutabilis L. Koch 14 19 28 I2
myrmecophilus and 3% were Othius punctulatus. In Lithobius macilentus L. Koch 0 + 0 0
the catches with ground photo-eclectors, 51% of the Lithobiusdentutus C.L. Koch 0 0 i 0
Staphylinidae were Aleocharinae and 17% Phyllo- Lithobius, juvenile 19 13 28 10
drepa ioptera. No obvious differences between the Funnel method (mean of four sampling dates 1992). + , between 0
treatments were observed in the samples taken with and 1 ind. me2 found.
A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-51 49
The average density of all Lithobius spp. was rates by saprophages are lower in the forest on
higher on the limed plots (65 ind. m-‘) than on the moder soil (Solling beech forest) than in the beech
unlimed plots (37 ind. m-‘1 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4(f)). mull soil, presumably because mean annual biomass
The same was true for the anamorphic Lithobiidae, of all saprophages is only 5-6 g rnp2 in the Solling
with a significance of P < 0.01. Lithobius curtipes forest. In the present study Lumbricidae and other
thrived on the limed plots as well. An increase in saprophages such as Sciaridae, Scatopsidae and Tip-
Lithobius numbers, due to liming, was described by ulidae were most abundant on the limed plots. These
Schauermann (1985). Schaefer (1991~) stated that groups contribute significantly to leaf-litter break-
Centipedes are an important group of the predatory down by their feeding activities. Altmiiller (1976)
macrofauna in the soil-litter subsystem. Lithobiidae pointed out that Diptera are the most important
feed mainly on mobile animals such as Collembola, decomposers in the beech forest of the Solling. The
Diptera and Lumbricidae. It may therefore be as- author concluded that the decomposition of litter can
sumed that the relatively high lumbricid numbers on be attributed mainly to the activity of sciarid and
the limed plots have contributed to the increase in sciophilid larvae. According to Altmiiller (19761, the
Lithobius. larvae of the Sciaridae and Mycetophilidae (mainly
Gretschy (1952) pointed out that Myriopoda need Sciophilidae) are consuming 13-29% of the annual
highly porous soil because they lack digging ability. litter fall. Hovemeyer (in Schaefer, 1982) estimated
It is possible that the high number of Lumbricidae on that larvae of Sciaridae in a German mull forest
the limed plots increases the porosity of the soil, thus processed about 8% of the annual input of litter
improving the microhabitat for the Lithobiidae. originating from green phytomass. Binns (1981) as-
sumed that macrohumiphagous Sciaridae and Scio-
philidae have a positive effect on the development of
microflora. Perel et al. (1971) found a stimulating
effect of tipulid larvae (as macrohumiphages) on the
decomposition process. Summing up, the results of
4. General conclusions
the present study suggest a change of moder soil into
mull soil after liming.
In this study, the change of soil moisture, caused Heterotrophic effects are greatest in decomposer
by the treatments, was assumed to be the most processes. In a forest ecosystem about 90-95% of
important factor determining the change in popula- total heterotrophic respiration is contributed by de-
tion densities. Other factors, such as soil and litter composers. Furthermore, the heterotrophic commu-
chemical parameters, were not considered because of nity performs an important function in controlling
the speculative nature of the influence of these fac- the fluctuations in the rate of nitrogen release
tors on the abundance of faunal groups. (Schaefer, 1991b). Therefore, because of the in-
It has been hypothesized that liming changes creased density of Lumbricidae, Sciaridae, Scatopsi-
moder profile into mull profile. Schaefer and dae and Tipulidae on the limed plots, a more rapid
Schauermann (1990) compared the soil fauna charac- mineralization and mobilization of nutrients was ex-
teristics of two German beech forests-one on mull pected. This, however, was not found. Instead, on
soil, the other on moder soil (Soiling). They found the limed plots (19911, less nitrogen was mineralized
that Lumbricidae, Chilopoda and carabid beetles are compared to the unlimed plots.
favoured on mull soil. The results of the present It has further been hypothesized that the decom-
study indicate a positive effect of liming on the poser community decreases as a result of clear-cut-
abundance of these taxa and, therefore, a change ting. This, however, has not been found. Lumbricids
from moder into mull soil. Mull soils are character- were not significantly influenced by clear-cutting.
ized by a much higher total soil-fauna biomass than This was also true for the macrohumiphagous
moder and mor soils (Schaefer, 1991~). This is be- Diptera. The emergence abundance of Limoniidae on
cause mull soils are dominated by Lumbricidae. the clear-cut plots was found to be even significantly
Schauermann (1986) points out that consumption higher than on the forest plots.
50 A. Theenhaus, M. Schaefer/Forest Ecology and Management 77 (1995) 35-5 1
in selected habitats in North Wales. J. Anim. Ecol., 41: Schauermann, J., 1982. Verbesserte Extraktion der terrestrischen
397-410. Bodenfauna im Vielfachgemt modifiziert nach Kempson und
Raw, F., 1967. Arthropoda (except Atari and Collembola). In: A. MacFadyen. Kurzmitteilungen aus dem Sonderforschungsbe-
Burges and F. Raw (Editors), Soil Biology. Academic Press reich, 135: 47-50.
Inc., London, pp. 323-362. Schauermann, J., 1985. Zur Reaktion von Bodentieren nach
Schaefer, M., 1982. Zur Funktion der saprophagen Bodentiere Dbngung von Hainsimsen-Buchenw%ldern und Siebenstem-
eines Kalkbuchenwaldes: Ein langfristiges Untersuchungspro- Fichtenforsten im Solling. Allgem. Forstzeitschr., 43: 1159-
gramm im Gottinger Wald. Drosera, 82: 75-82. 1160.
Schaefer, M., 1991a. The animal community: diversity and re- Schauermann, J., 1986. Die Tierwelt, ihre Nahrungsbeziehungen
sources. In: E. Rijhrig and M. Uhich (Editors), Temperate und ihre Rolle. Siedlungsdichten und Biomasse. In: H. Ellen-
Deciduous Forests (Ecosystems of the World). Elsevier, Am- berg, R. Mayer and J. Schauermann (Editors), Gkosystem-
sterdam, pp. 51-120. forschung, Ergebnisse des Sollingprojektes. Ulmer, Stuttgart,
Schaefer, M., 1991b. Secondary production and decomposition. pp. 225-265.
In: E. Riihrig and M. Ulrich (Editors), Temperate Deciduous Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W. and Anderson, J.M., 1979. Decomposi-
Forests (Ecosystems of the World). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. tion in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford, 372 pp.
175-218. Szujecki, A., 1971. The effect of clear-cutting upon the commu-
Schaefer, M., 1991~. Fauna of the European temperate deciduous nity of litter inhabiting Staphylinids (Co]., Staphylinidae) in
forest. In: E. Rohrig and M. Ulrich (Editors), Temperate fresh pine forests. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A 18: 5-45.
Deciduous Forests (Ecosystems of the World). Elsevier, Am- Szujecki, 1972. Impact of clear-cutting on the soil entomofauna.
sterdam, pp. 503-526. Contribution in the 7th World Forestry Congress, Buenos
Schaefer, M. and Schauermann, J., 1990. The soil fauna of beech Aires 1972.
forests: comparison between a mull and a moder soil. Pedobi-
ologia, 34: 299-314.