Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11
LOCATION PLANNING
Regional Factors
Raw Materials availability
Closer Markets
Labor Cost and availability of workers
Utilities & Taxes
Climate (for some industries)
Transportation
Manufacturing :
o Availability of energy and water
o Proximity to raw materials
o Transportation cost
Service:
o Traffic patterns
o Proximity to markets
o Location of competitors
• Onceimportantfactorshavebeendetermined,anorganizationwillnarrowdown
alternatives to a specific geographic region. These factors that influence location
selection are often different depending on whether the firm is a manufacturing or
service firm. When deciding on a location, mangers must take into account the
culture shock employees might face after a location move. Culture shock can have
a big impact on employees which might affect workers productivity, so it is
important that mangers look at this.
A. IDENTIFYING A COUNTRY
1. A decision maker must understand the benefits and risks as well as the
probabilities of them occurring
C.IDENTIFYING A COMMUNITY
1. There are many important factors for deciding upon the community in which
move a business. They include facilities for education, shopping, recreation and
transportation among many others. From a business standpoint these factors
include utilities, taxes, and environmental regulation.
D. IDENTIFYING A SITE
1. The main considerations in choosing a site are land, transportation, zoning and
many others. When identifying a site I]it is important to consider to see if the
company plans on growing at this location. If so, the firm must consider whether or
not location is suitable for expansion. There are many decisions that go into
choosing exactly where a firm will establish its operations. First, a company must
determine the driving factors that will influence which areas are suitable locations.
After these factors have been determined, the company will identify potential
countries and examine the pros and cons of establishing operations in these
countries. After looking at pro and cons of the different countries and deciding on a
country, then decision makers will identify a region within the country. When
identifying a region, decision makers must take the four major factors explained
above into consideration. The last two stages of the search include choosing a
community and a site.
* Products or product lines are produced in separate plants, and each plant is
usually responsible for supplying the entire domestic market.
* It is a decentralized approach as each plant focuses on a narrow set of
requirements that includes specialization of labor, materials, and equipment along
product lines.
* Specialization involved in this strategy usually results in economies of scale
and, compared to multipurpose plants, lower operating costs.
* The plant locations may either be widely scattered or placed relatively close to
one another.
Plants are flexible and have the ability to handle a range of products
* It allows for a quick response to products and market changes, but can be less
productive than a more focused approach.
* A benefit to this approach is the increase in learning opportunities that happens
when similar operations are being done in different plants. Solutions to problems as
well as improvements made at one plant can be shared with the other plants
In choosing a proper location for a plant, first regional factors are analyzed and a
suitable region is chosen. Then, a suitable community within the chosen region is
selected; the final step is narrowing down on the specific site within that community
where the plant will be built.
Factor Rating
Locational Break-even Analysis
Grid Method
Linear Integer Programming
where FC=Fixed Cost, v=Variable Cost per Unit, Q=Number of Units (Also shown
below but not in the same format)
a. Factor Rating
1. This method involves qualitative and quantitative inputs, and evaluates
alternatives based on comparison after establishing a composite value for each
alternative. Factor Rating consists of six steps:
1. Determine relevant and important factors.
2. Assign a weight to each factor, with all weights totaling 1.00.
3. Determine common scale for all factors, usually 0 to 100.
4. Score each alternative.
5. Adjust score using weights (multiply factor weight by score factor); add
up scores for each alternative.
6. The alternative with the highest score is considered the best option.
References :