You are on page 1of 4

Production/Operations Management

Author(s): George J. Gore


Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Apr., 1976), pp. 130-132
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/257496 .
Accessed: 06/06/2011 23:42

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aom. .

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Academy of Management is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Academy
of Management Review.

http://www.jstor.org
130 Book Reviews

nent use for its teachable combination of the Joseph Bower's Managing the Resource Al-
strategy concept and case materials selected to location Process (Division of Research, Harvard,
support it. 1970), among other findings from an intensive
George Steiner was among the earliest to study of capital allocation in a single major com-
write in the area of long range planning. His early pany, suggests that normative financial and eco-
books were devoted more to description of plan- nomic models of capital allocation are not neces-
ning systems than to the development of norma- sarily used, nor would they be predictive of de-
tive models of strategic planning. Steiner's Top cisions actually made. The allocation process is
Management Planning (Macmillan, 1969) takes far more complex and uncertain than the econo-
a more normative view in Part II where it devel- mist's normative models would suggest. Whether
ops a process for corporate planning and in Part Bower's findings would hold over a wider range
III where it suggests tools useful for rational de- of organizations is an unanswered question;
cision-making and by implication for a rational nevertheless, his conclusions are provocative in
or normative corporate planning approach. their implications for the normative model build-
Ansoff, Robert Hayes and Roger Declerck, er.
editors of a forthcoming book of papers collect- Finally, Henry Mintzberg's The Nature of
ed from the "first" international conference on Managerial Work (Harper and Row, 1973), based
strategic management, illustrate their purpose in on extensive literature and field research, de-
the title: From Strategic Planning to Strategic scribes the job of the (higher level) manager in
Management, (John Wiley, forthcoming 1976). terms of job characteristics, basic roles per-
The important strategic management tasks of top formed and how tasks are accomplished. The
management are now being recognized and de- taxonomy is as interesting as the empirical de-
fined. These tasks go beyond planning, as the de- scription of what managers do. What they do,
scriptive stream would agree. This new book, es- according to Mintzberg, is to fill a wide range of
pecially the article by the editors, helps define roles with a wide range of contingency modes of
those tasks more carefully. operation, not all of which are highly "rational."
Descriptive Models - A major book in the Any normative model builder who ignores
the message of real-world complexity in these
descriptive stream is the collection of papers
edited by Raymond Bauer and Kenneth Gergen, four books will overlook important insights into
The Study of Policy Formation (The Free Press, gaining greater relevancy and realism. On the
1968). An important message throughout the other hand, the descriptive research risks the
book is the need for gaining greater understand- bias that comes from subjectivity and the limited
ing of complex policy formation processes samples that are a part of descriptive field re-
through empirical research. The limitations and search. There is no reason to be in one stream
uses of formal models for optimal policy forma- without understanding the contributions of the
tion are also developed. other.
Charles Lindblom, in his short monograph, Dan Schendel
The Policy-Making Process (Prentice-Hall, 1968), Purdue University
examines public policy formation and concludes
that the rational or "synoptic" approach fails to
apply. To Lindblom, a political scientist, manag- Production/Operations Management
ers must "muddle through" or practice "dis- While no one significant text is omnipotent
jointed incrementalism" because more inclusive in 1976, production/operations management is
models are too complicated and unrealistic to be not a static field. Professors should make their
useful to the practitioner. own evaluations from the inner circle of best sel-
Academy of Management Review - April 1976 131

lers since it is sometimes advisable to dethrone a specifics provide the worth of the book more
long-used author in favor of a newcomer. Three than the abstract theorizing.
voices with different accents have been selected Quantitative -In the introductory chapter
for this review since a book will be effective only to his Production and Operations Management
to the extent that its treatment is consistent with (McGraw-Hill, 1975), Richard P. Mayer discusses
the needs of the user. The three have different his approach - an interrelated system with ex-
approaches - orthodox, quantitative and be- cursions involving production, marketing, fi-
havioral. nance, and personnel relations. He firmly be-
Orthodox - RichardB. Chase and Nicholas lieves that what is done in any one of these areas
Aquilano, in their Production and Operations will have an effect on the others just as he feels
Management (Richard D. Irwin, 1973), have de- that a P/OM text should include activities related
veloped a well-balanced and comprehensive, to the provision of both goods and services. The
intermediate-level text which treats safe and fa- author states that all operations personnel have
miliarsubjects with a new "life cycle" twist. What the basic responsibilities of producing the firm's
emerges is a readable smorgasbordwith mass ap- products or services in such a way that they ful-
peal. fill the requirements for quantity, quality, com-
Production and Operations Management is pletion and delivery deadlines, and do these
divided, somewhat unevenly, into the following things in the most economical manner. Hence,
seven sections with the number of related chap- the topics chosen are appropriately related to
ters in parentheses: Selection of the Product (1); the primary responsibilities of an operations
Design of the System (9); Manning the System manager, and the heart of the book is predicta-
(2); Startup of the System (1); The System in bly limited to specific, production activities.
Steady State (3); Revision of the System (1); and Areas covered include informative and un-
Terminationof the System (1). pretentious discussions of the performance and
The unifying theme, the "life cycle" idea, limitations of production planning; production
seems valid and laudable. Indeed, it comes close control; quality control; methods analysis; ma-
to exemplifying an ideal approach. The authors terials handling; plant layout; inventory control;
realisticallytreat the productive system as a col- work measurement; and wage incentives. On
lection of dynamic rather than static entities, the whole, Mayer has produced a reasonable
providing a systematic analysis of a product in and balanced indoctrination into P/OM. This one
each interrelated stage from birth to death. should probably be used in a beginning gradu-
Level-headed and pragmatic, this solid text ate level course in business.
should fit into either a rock-bottom undergrad- Behavioral - Arthur C. Laufer's Operations
uate course in P/OM or, geared up, could be a Management (Southwestern Publishing, 1975)
perspective-giving guide in an introductory sketches a broad view of the different functions
graduate offering. An ideal application might be of producing the products or services of an en-
for a one-shot, potent course required of gradu- terprise. His forte is the behavioral element in
ate students majoring in other fields of business operations management; the material is most
administration, industrial relations, or econom- convincing in the areas of manpower, ergonom-
ics. ics, work measurement, and decision making. It
While the text is most alert to the technical may be revealing that the word "production"
necessities of managing a production operation, does not appear in the title.
it also treats the larger social and environmental Laufer launches the work with a probing
parameters which temper most managerialdeci- historical overview of management and pro-
sions today. As with other P/OM volumes, the ceeds to the operations function and systems
132 Book Reviews

approach. He is to be praised on at least two ac- the role of perception, continuing with the
counts. First, the section on decision making unique relationship between motivation and
contains the role of computers; probability as communication, and ending with a communica-
well as economics and accounting models; and tion model. Part III, the longest section in the
decisions under certainty, risk, and uncertainty. text, may be the most original and provocative.
Second, the two chapters on quantitative models Here the author discusses "Patterns of Miscom-
also contain various methods and are fairly easy munications". Drawing on underlying assump-
to understand despite their brevity. tions of General Semantics Theory, Haney cre-
It is an easy - if not impressive - tour ates an almost mirror-like assemblage of chap-
through operations management. Since many ters into which the student can gaze with
subjects are touched upon with little depth, it thoughtful introspection. What the student sees
may appeal most to those on the fringe of the will be at once disturbing and enlightening; dis-
field. But this is a general text and cannot be turbing, because the student sees his or her own
thorough. While it may have a limited audience, behavior vividly portrayed with all its inconsist-
it would probably be appropriate for an "ex- encies, frailities, and failures; and enlightening,
posure" course at the junior or senior level. A because the student concludes this introspec-
professor with behavioral leanings might feel it tion mindful of the tools with which his or her
fills a vacuum. own behavior can be modified.
The second book is Lee Thayer's Communi-
George J. Gore
cation and Communication Systems in Organiza-
University of Cincinnati
tion, Management, and Interpersonal Relations
(Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.,
Organizational Communication 1968). This book presents a most unique concept
Three books stand out as significant and of communication. In the first few chapters Thay-
er develops his concept and then extracts from it
representative contributions to the field of or-
a host of logical and consistent implications.
ganizational communication.
The first is William V. Haney's Communica- Thayer begins by disavowing the notion that
tion and Organizational Behavior: Text and communication is something going on between
Cases, 3rd ed. (Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. the "sender" and "receiver". Instead, he argues
Irwin, Inc., 1973). As the title implies, it is built that communication is best thought of as "the
on the major thesis that organizational behavior organism taking something into account". This
and communication are inextricably interwoven. concept puts the emphasis on the receiver rather
In addition, a basic premise is that communica- than the sender. It suggests that the "something"
tion is not limited to speaking, debating, writing, the receiver takes into account is only partially
or listening. Rather, communication subsumes determined by the sender. Also at work are the
all these activities and others as well. Communi- unique take-into-account-abilities of the re-
cation, as Haney treats it, focuses on all modes of ceiver. Hence the sender must first understand
human interchange including processes associ- the nature of these take-into-account-abilities
ated with "thinking" as well as processes associ- before making intelligent use of the array of
ated with "communicating". communication techniques available.
To this end, the author develops a three part If communication is "the organism taking
text. Part I establishes a linkage between the cli- something into account", then organizations do
mate of the organization and the communication not communicate, only persons in organizations.
that transpires within it. Part II presents the be- Similarly, it makes little sense to expect the data
havioral basis of communication, opening with system to communicate. Data systems merely

You might also like