Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 11
Natural theology vs. revealed theology, sources of these theologies
• Theology: the study or science or knowledge of God (theos- God)
o Natural Theology: the study or science or knowledge of God through the natural intellect,
unaided by any special or supernatural input.
Humanity God
o Revealed Theology: the knowledge of God through special revelation, such as the Bible, the
Church, Moses, Christ, Holy Spirit, etc.
God Humanity
a posteriori arguments for God's existence and a priori arguments for God's existence
A Posteriori Arguments (demonstrates God by means of sense experience)
• Cosmological arguments
• Teleological arguments
• Definition: A proof for God’s existence: God must exist as the ultimate cause of the contingent,
physical universe/
• First-cause Argument, contingency
• Thomistic Cosmological argument: Unmoved mover (transcendent: dualism)
• Popular form: uncomfortable with leaving it open- ended as in the Thomistic form. Argument for
Transcendence speaks of a beginning of time for the physical universe, created by the ultimate being.
Teleological argument
- Watches, houses, ships, machines, and so on all exhibit design, and they are planned and produced by
intelligent beings.
- The universe exhibits design_____________________________________________________
- Therefore, the universe was planned and produced by an intelligent being.
Chapter 12
Ontological argument
A proof for God’s existence: God must exist inasmuch as the attribute of existence (or, in
some forms, necessary existence) is part of his nature.
God is the greatest or most perfect being.
A being who exists is greater or more perfect than being who does not exist._________________
Therefore, God must exist.
Anselm's version
• Ps. 14:1- The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” NASM
• The fool, even though he rejects the existence of God, by mentioning God, he/she is admitting to the
possibility of such a being and therefore exists in their mind.
• God is the most perfect being that can be conceived. There is no greater than God that can be
conceived. If there is no one greater, one cannot say that the greatest being does not exist.
Existence as a predicate
• Critics of ontological argument usually base their attack on the notion that existence is not an essential
criterion.
• Kant: omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, etc. are predicates, but not existence. (this is not an
example of identical judgment, A is A) You cannot accept the reality of a triangle, but reject the sum
of its angles having 180 degrees. However, you can reject the 180 degrees if you reject the reality of
triangles.
Malcolm's version
• Unlimited being not bound by time, so no beginning point- either exists or doesn’t exists
Unlimited being existing without limits, so always existing, is consistent (consistency principle)
Such a being is then necessary.
• Focuses on God as a being without limits.
Moral argument
• Absolute moral law exists Absolute moral law necessitates an absolute mind as its author
Therefore, an absolute mind exists as the author of objective morality.
• Sense experience vs. Moral experience
• moral laws (dependent on context, values adaptability and application.) vs. Moral law (existence of an
eternal universal principle of morality)
• Definition: God must exist as the only adequate foundation of genuine (objective) morality.
Moral absolutism
The view that moral values are independent of human opinion and have a common or universal
application.
Moral relativism
The denial of any absolute or objective moral values, and the affirmation of the individual (person
community, culture, etc.) as the source of morality.
Religious experience and its efficacy as an argument for God: nonrational, directness, privacy
• Non rational
o Beyond rational, something that cannot be explained at all by reason.
• Directness
o Positive (+)
• Privacy
Negative (-)
Chapter 13
Nature of evil
The nature of evil comes from the argument of God on the basis of the existence of evil in the world.
Moral evil
• Volitional/ intentional human acts. Springs from the human will. Think of the nazi death camps,
genocide in Rwanda, tortured prisoners of war.
Natural evil
• Resulting from natural causes. Think of Hurricane Katrina, AIDS, the great San Francisco earthquake,
the sinking of Titanic.
Physical evil
• Mental or physical pain
Metaphysical evil
• Things happening by chance, deformities, imperfections (injustice, genetics, deformities, etc.)
Theodicy
• Attempts to make the existence of evil consistent with the existence of an omnibenevolent, omniscient,
omnipotent, prefect God.
• Definition: The attempt to reconcile the traditional view of God and the evil of the world.
• As long as Christianity tries to hold on to the platonic being/ becoming dualism, this issue will remain
problematic (see Hume’s statement of the problem on p.310.)
• Problem: how could a perfect God create a world with sin in it?
Open-theism
o Richard Rice
o Makes the case for a personal God who is open to influence through the prayers, decisions,
and actions of people. Although many specific outcomes of the future are unknowable, God's
foreknowledge of the future includes that which is determined as time progresses often in
light of free decisions that have been made and what has been sociologically determined.
o So God knows everything that has been determined as well as what has not yet been
determined but remains open.
o As such, God is able to anticipate the future, yet remains fluid to respond and react to prayer
and decisions made either contrary or advantageous to God's plan or presuppositions.
Chapter 14
Necessity of morality, reasons:
(Definition: Belief in and conformity to principles of virtuous conduct)
• Is morality necessary?
o Why should people care about morality?
o Psychological reasons:
Conscience
Social censure/reputation
o Sociological reason
o Theological reason
Psychological
(The psychological egoist claims that all actions are inevitably motivated by self-interest. Regardless of
appearances to the contrary, we are all selfish. It shows, first, that this is a psychological theory, a claim about
human nature rather than a theory of morality. Psychological egoism makes a claim about what we can (and cannot)
do, not what we should (and should not) do. As a result, it is really another form of determinism claiming that the
selfishness of human behavior is determined.)
Concscience
Social censure/reputation
Sociological
theological
Ethical relativism/subjectivism
(The denial of any absolute or objective moral values, and the affirmation of the individual (Person, community,
cluture, etc.) as the source of morality.
Cultural relativism
• Each of the many differing cultures has its own manner of thinking, feeling, and behaving as passed on
from previous generations as well-documented by cultural anthropologists.
(The view that morality and other values are rooted in the experience, habits, and preferences of a culture.)
Descriptive ethical relativism: The variations in customs in differing cultures are due to the sense of morality.
What is moral in one country is immoral in another)
Examples of descriptive ethical relativism:
• There are no absolute, universal moral standards(not even that of tolerance) and one is in no position to judge
or criticize other individuals or societies for falling behind in morality
• Absolutism in contrast says, moral truths exist and we do and should judge others and societies using reason
sprinkled with sympathy and understanding.
• Each culture makes its own moral standards. Applying one principle from one culture to another is an
exhibition of power by those who hold political leadership
• Since tolerance is not accepted as a moral standard in normative cultural relativism, the self-assertion of cultural
relativism is inconsistent. A culture where superiority and intolerance is taught has made those things a norm in
their culture and therefore right for the culture. There is no acceptance of people in that context
• Going by each culture, the norm is the one that is upheld by the majority in that culture. Therefore, there are no
principles or standards that can lead to moral reform.
• If being raised a certain way is an issue, this should apply to small minority groups within societies. People
with different upbringing need to make their own moral choices. This leads to that each person has the right to
choose his/her own moral standards, leading to complete individual subjectivity.
• Followers of normative ethical relativism do pass judgments on practices such as genital mutilation, female
infanticide and so forth. This is an inconsistency in their methodology
• Although variation exist, that doesn’t mean that there are no points of convergence in morality (e.g. killing is
wrong)
Psychological egoism
The theory of human nature asserting that all actions are motivated exclusively by self-interest.
Humanism
As is evident from the word itself, humanism is the exaltation of humanity as the source and criterion of all value
and meaning.
Existentialism
The philosophy that emphasizes the existing individual as opposed to abstractions or principles, as the point of
departure for authentic philosophizing. Two existentialist slogans from Sartre: 1. Existence precedes essence. 2.
Subjectivity must be the starting point.
Chapter 15
Deontological vs. teleological ethics
- Deontological Ethics: is an approach to ethics that judges the morality of
an action based on the action’s adherence to a rule or rules. (looks at
rules and duties)
- Teleological Ethics: is an approach to ethics is he study of goals, ends,
and purposes.
Ethics:
- Deontologicai: Emphasis on the performance of duty, rather than results,
as the sign of right actions
- Teleologcail: Emphasis on the results of actions as the test of their
rightness.
- Utilitarianism has always gone hand in hand with hedonism, which certainly
does specify that nature of good. Hedonism is the doctrine that pleasure is
the highest good and that production of pleasure is the criterion of right
action.
- Psychological egoism: Ultilitariansim holds that one ought to consider everyone and
produce the greatest balance of good over evil; while egoism, by contrast, says that each
person ought to maximize their own good.
Principle of utility
The principle of utility is where the heart of utilitarianism lies. The word
“utility” simple means “usefulness” but the utilitarians employ it to mean that which
promoted the greatest balance of good over evil, thus utilitarianism is the doctine
that we ought to act so as to promote the greatest balance of good over evil.
Benevolence principle
When utilitarianism is not motivated out of self-interest but out of an interest
for the greatest possible number of persons and aims at their satisfaction.
Utilitarianism relies on the Benevolence Principle: Happiness is to be distributed as
widely and as equally as possible among all people. Thus utilitarianism is, finally,
the doctrine that we ought to act so as to promote the greatest happiness for the
number.
social hedonism
Utilitarianism as social hedonism, the theory that we should promote the good of
society or the pleasure of all people. Thus utilitarianism is not motivated out of self-
interest but out of an interest for the greatest possible number of persons and aims at
their satisfaction.
Objections to utilitarianism
There is more to life than pleasure; knowledge, virtue and other things are
important too. Utilitarianism is a doctrine worthy only of swine.
- Utilitarianism is impractical
- We can’t predict the consequences of an Action
- Utilitarianism is too demanding
- Utilitarianism ignores distributive justice
- Sometimes the end doesn’t justify the means
Chapter 16
conditional vs. unconditional ought
: Kant defines this as, the conditional, you ought to do something because if
should act through our sense of duty, not for sake of consequences.
Categorical imperative
Is the fundament principle of morality. More accurately, it is criterion or test
by which we can make sure our actions are moral – that is, that they are motivated
by a good will or performed out of duty. “Act only according to that maxim by which
you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” Kant (the
most famous and important concepts in history of ethics: the Categorical
Imperative.
Principle of Univeralizability
A principle that an act is good if everyone should, in similar circumstances, do the
same act with exception.
- The Kantian principle that if a course of action cannot be universally
adopted it must be morally impermissible.
- A complex and controversial notion which has been used both to
distinguish the moral from the non-moral and to distinguish the moral
from the immoral – two jobs which tend to get in each other’s way
Chapter 17
Virtue theory
Virtues
(Traits of character that are manifest in action)
• Acts are moral when they conform to and support natural laws
• Natural laws are discernible through human reason and therefore, it is human duty to use reason to act in
conformity to natural laws
• Survival and procreation are inherent part of being human, so acts that conform to these purposes are
morally good and those that work against these purposes are morally wrong.
• With this theory, there is a right to life and health that makes that life possible. Therefore anything that
harms human life or human health is morally wrong.
• Human reason is what allows us to discover natural laws and helps us to discern the right course of
action
• Survival and procreation are inherent part of being human, so acts that conform to these purposes are
morally good and those that work against these purposes are morally wrong.
• It is the foundation of our social, political, and ethical structures and institutions.
• To act in conformity with virtue is nothing but acting, living, and preserving our being as reason directs.
Chapter 18
Liberalism
Liberalism comes from the Latin “libertas means liberty or freedom”. It insists on the
freedom of the individual: both freedom from undue external and governmental controls,
and the freedom to pursue individual interests.
Original stances/beliefs of liberalism and conservatism and how they differ from
the current stances
Original stances/beliefs of liberalism and conservatism was that liberalism is the
ideology of freedom, and conservatism is a political and social philosophy that promotes the
maintenance of traditional institutions and supports, at the most, minimal and gradual
change in society.
Chapter 19
Rousseau’s democracy
His view on freedom was that he took freedom as his starting point of democracy.
But when a person joins society, he or she is giving up his or her freedom in order to
live within that given community. These freedoms are voluntarily given up to the
legitimate government powers. He said that these laws, or restrictions on the
community are allowed because this will allow the community to live together.
Consent
This idea is the basis of democracy. Democracy cannot exist if there was not
consent or an agreement of the people. And from this idea of consent from the
people is where democracy gets its power. That the majority of the people got what
they wanted.
social contract
The Social Contract is the contract that is agreed upon when one lives in a society.
This contract is stating that the people who live in society are bound to the law and
if they break it then there will be a punishment, but this restriction is rewarded with
freedom and communion. And rational people will likely chose to be part of a
society that is restricted but protected, rather than complete freedom living in fear
and discomfort.
general will
This is the concept that people consent to and which provides the “supreme
direction” of the governing social life. This can be explained that as a person has his
or her personal goals, so does the community. The majority of the community will
govern which way society is going to go. The majority of the community may or
may not have the same interest as the certain individual, but no matter what, the
majority of the people decide which way the community will run and go. (“The good
of the people”)
problem of consent
The problem of consent is “How can consent be the basis of democratic government
when most citizens do not explicitly give their consent?” (p. 470) Ideas?
- Plutocracy:
- Democracy:
- Dictatorship:
Chapter 20
Three most important views: Rawls, MacIntyre, and Okin
Rawls: Rawls’ two principles of justice:
- The Principle of Equal Basic Liberty for All:
“Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both
a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and b) attach to
the positions and offices open to all.”
What kind of historical philosophical influence did Rawls and Nozick have?
Rawls and Nozick philosophical influences on the theories that they developed.
Nozick
Nozick’s three principles of justice in holdings:
- The Principle of Justice in Acquisition:
How do the views of MacIntyre and Okin criticize this more traditional view
of Rawls (and Nozick, but Nozick's view is not going to be tested on).
The views of MacIntyre and Oktin criticize this more traditional view
of Rawls because the traditional view of Rawls was more traditional and
the Nozick’s view was more modern in the aspects of how the government
should treat the citizens, etc.