COMMERCIAL

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
State of Oklahoma County of Tulsa ) ) ss: )

I,

Chuck A,Figueroa , being first duly sworn, depose and say:

1. That I am the Secured Party/Creditor of the Debtor (WANDA FIGUEROA) (stramineus homo). 2. That as the Secured Party, I have a priority interest in protecting the property and property right(s) of the both the Debtor and the Secured Party. 3. That I am the creditor/principle holding claim and priority lien interest to the Debtor. (See UCC-l attached) 4. I, ChuckA,Figueroa depose and say the following that I Chuck A, Figueroa, herein Affiant became aware of a cause being filed to unlawfully seize his mothers property by Reginald Sharp and Yvonne Fisher that have no jurisdiction to do so, as Affiants mother was kidnapped by Reginald Sharp with assistance of Broken Arrow police and alleged Tulsa County Sheriffs deputy Pat Martin under arms over Affiant and Affiants mothers objections as Affiants mother tried to fend off the kidnappers violent seizure on or about October 8th 2011. Affiants mother was subsequently hidden where Affiant has not seen nor heard from his kidnapped mother since October 8th 2011 Roughly 2 weeks after the second kidnapping, the first one was on or about September 22nd 2011, the parties involved closed Wanda Figueroa's bank account stole her funds and are having her social security sent to them under their control without the authority to do so On or about the first or second week of April Reginald Sharp and parties involved submitted fraudulent documents to Tulsa District court small claims court to steal Affiants and Affiants mothers property, when Affiant became aware of the attempt by viewing the courts website it appeared to affiant that Reginald Sharp with assistance from Yvonne Fisher and alleged Judge Millie Otey are making an unwarranted attack on plaintiffs mothers and plaintiffs property by unlawful administrative process. Affiant noticed alleged judge Millie Otey of affiants Legal Notice of Void Judgment and Ministerial Duty to Vacate Void Judgment and a Motion To vacate Void Judgment filed on or about the first week of April 2011. Affiant exercising his rights to defend property has made demand on alleged judge Millie Otey to

vacate the void judgment as shown in exhibit E. As set forth in defendants affidavit attached hereto, (exhibit Z) a hearing was held on April 27th 2011 on Affiants motion to vacate void judgment at which Reginald Sharp failed to prove personal jurisdiction over detainee Wanda Figueroa from inception as challenged by affiant Chuck,A, Figueroa, in fact, Reginald Sharp admitted in his own testimony at hearing held on April 27th 2011 that he never had jurisdiction in the first instance over Wanda Figueroa. Affiant has challenged jurisdiction of alleged case from the beginning and was never answered by alleged plaintiff, as if they were and are never required to prove jurisdiction when challenged. Alleged judge Millie Otey in an absolute and total refusal to perform ministerial duty failed to exercise its inherent power to vacate the void judgment. Alleged judge Millie Otey in violation of her ministerial duties and duties compelled by the cannon of ethics in regards to her office has allegedly flagrantly violated violated the laws when those laws absolutely require specific performance from the alleged judge Millie Otey to give the Affiant the relief sought. lleged judge Millie Otey has a clear legal duty to act pursuant to her oath of office, the cannon of ethics in reporting unethical conduct of attorneys that occur in her court and in her presence.. alleged judge Millie Otey clearly observed the fraud upon the court. Alleged judge Millie Otey knew or should have known that she had a ministerial duty to comply with the uncontroverted facts of the record and act accordingly thereto as requested in Affiants motion tho vacate void judgment. The motion to vacate as void ncluded precedent case law on standing on jurisdictional void (see memorandum in support/brief overview of law of voids exhibit D). The vacation of a void judgment that is void on its face as requested of the alleged judge Millie Otey is not a discretionary act in that the judgment is void on its face and requires the ministerial act of vacating the same if requested to by any party affected thereby On or about April 26th 2011, Affiant was attacked by alleged sheriffs deputies by gunpoint on Affiants property as sheriffs deputies broke down Affiants front door by sheriffs deputies battering ram and drew pistols to Affiants head screaming at Affiant to lay on the ground in Affiants living room in Affiants home screaming at Affiant that Affiant will be shot if Affiant didn't fall and lay on the ground, screaming at Affiant that this is a eviction that the property and house now belong to the DHS and forcefully at gunpoint drove Affiant from his home, off the family property, showing Affiant no warrant, no valid documentary papers or anything. This happened 1 day before Affiants hearing to vacate void judgment as there was a controversy involving said alleged case and alleged judge Millie Otey was duly noticed of void judgment prior to armed invasion. Alleged judge Millie Otey on or about the 18th of April 18th 2011 set an hearing for Affiants motion to vacate void judgment to be heard on the 27th of April 2011.

Although alleged judge Millie Otey set hearing for Affiants motion to vacate void judgment for April 27 th 2011, and there was an apparent controversy to be resolved, Tulsa County Sheriffs deputies were allegedly instructed to forcefully under arms invade Affiants home and under arms forcefully eject Affiant from his home using deadly force if necessary, which in fact nearly resulted in the death of Affiant. Alleged Plaintiff Reginald sharp admitted under oath when interrogated by Petitioner at motion to vacate void judgment hearing held on April 27th 2011, that plaintiff never established jurisdiction in the first instance over Wanda Figueroa on the face of the record. Affiant has a clear legal right and duty to request of the Alleged Judge Millie Otey to vacate the judgment as void. Alleged Judge Millie Otey has a clear legal duty in that both the law and her job required specific performance based on the face of the record. Affiant brought to the attention to Alleged Judge Millie Otey her ministerial duty to vacate the void judgment as it has been proven to be void on the face of the record as Reginald Sharp has failed to prove jurisdiction in the first instance over affiants mother and hence her property and in fact that Reginald Sharp admitted under oath on his own testimony that he had no jurisdiction from the first instance over Wanda Figueroa and Alleged Judge Millie Otey defiantly decided, without authority to do so, to move forward any way unlawfully, totally and wholly without jurisdiction on the face of the record and trespass on the law and against affiant and affiants mother causing great injury and damage against affiant and affiants mother. 5. That (Millie Otey, Reginald Sharp, Yvonne Fisher,Tulsa County Sheriffs Deputies-does and assisted by other Parties see exhibits mentioned above and attached hereto), in his/her act(s) did cause injury and damage being, loss of WANDA FIGUEROA, loss of property. damage, injury, humiliation, embarrassment, emotional and physical distress, etc.) and expenses incurred, violation of civil rights under the Constitution of the United States of America. Amendments I, IV, V and VIIl pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983 and 1988, and claims for the violation of rights under the Constitution of the State of (Oklahoma) Article I. Section 3.8 9. 10. & 13 Article 2 section 2, 10: plus claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, armed robbery,robbery by fear,sham legal process,assault, battery, harassment, detriment of character, and etc., as mentioned above. 6. That said damages are real and approximate as so enumerated on STANDARD FORM 95 (optional), in and for this private matter, re: Claim for Damages, attached herein, and damages set at One million Five hundred thousand dollars) ($1.500,000) in USD. WHEREFORE, this commercial affidavit of truth supports Claimants' Tort Notice and Claim for Damages and is True, Correct, and Certain. Further, Affiant sayeth not. ____________________________________________ Affiant/Claimant - Secured Party/Creditor

SUBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN before me this _________ day of May, 2011 A.D.
_______________________________________________________________________________________~

Notary

State of Oklahoma, County of Tulsa"