Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 October 2004
F-35 Variants
STOVL Integrated STOVL Propulsion System, Flying Qualities and Performance From Hover Through Supersonic Flight
CTOL Flying Qualities, Engine-Inlet Compatibility, and Flight Performance at Representative Mission Points
CV Carrier Suitable Flying and Handling Qualities and Flight Performance at Representative Mission Points
2
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
JSF0929005
X-35A/B Features
Conventional Configuration
Liftfan Nozzle Doors (Activated - Commanded Closed) Air Refuel Receptacle Engine Bay Vent Static Inlet (Typ.) Air Data Sensors ECS Ram Air Inlet ECS Ram Air Exhaust Roll Nozzle Aperture (Sealed)
Aux. Inlet Doors APU Inlet (Activated -Commanded Closed) APU Exhaust LiftFan Inlet Doors (Activated - Commanded Closed) Engine Bay Vent Ram Inlet Cockpit Emergency Vent Inlet 3BSD Nozzle Doors (Activated Commanded Closed)
X-35A/B Features
STOVL Configuration
Roll Nozzle Air Refuel Receptacle
3BSD Doors 3BSD Aux Inlet Rabbit Ear Doors & Louver Mechanism
4
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
X-35C Features
CV Configuration
LiftFan Nozzle Doors (Activated - Commanded Closed) Ailerons
Air Refuel Receptacle Aux Inlet Doors (Activated - Commanded Closed) LiftFan Inlet Doors (Activated - Commanded Closed) Simulated Air Refuel Probe Emergency Tail Hook 3BSN Nozzle Doors (Activated Commanded Closed)
5
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
6
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Isolate
Commands
Regulator
Z-1
Sensor Compensation
Common Control Law Structure for All Aircraft Variants Common Control Law Structure for All Aircraft Variants
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
x = Ax + Bu cv = Cx
Desired Acceleration
. cv
+
des
(CB)-1
u
Control Effectiveness Matrix Inverse
CAx
Estimated Acceleration
+
Cmdroll
Ps
1/roll
Ps desired
Roll Rate (deg/sec)
63% Max
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Time (sec)
roll
Simple Dynamic Inversion Roll Control Law Provides a Classical First Order Roll Response
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
10
ATLAS
Non-linear Sim
Yaw Rate (deg/sec)
Linear Analysis/Design
Linear Models A B C D
50 25 0 -25 -50 0 4 2 0 -2 -4 0 4 2 0 -2 -4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
CLAW Gains
Beta (deg)
Models RTW/ERT C
Central Model
Simulink/Stateflow
Flowdown Reqts (SRS) Gain Data
Simulators
Control Laws
Interface
Design Guides
Design Doc (SDD)
Mode Logic
RTW ERT C
OFP
SGI
11
Link Link
SDD Text
12
Where We Are
Model-Based Design proven in CDA phase Successful flight test of all variants with one OFP Reduced Software Defects (Early Checkout in Engineering Simulations) Overall Reduction in Manhours/SLOC of ~40%
CLAW and Air Data code is running in offline simulation, handling qualities simulator, and on target hardware on test stations
MathWorks support has been a key element in overcoming obstacles R13SP1 R14SP1
13
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Challenges
14
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Whats Next
R14 Model Reference is important new technology
Incremental code generation
EML could be very useful for utility development Improvements in code generation
Better MISRA compliance More efficient code
Improved code customization capabilities R15 More improvement needed in code efficiency Mapping of function interfaces from model to code Improvements to reusable function code
Work toward the goal of producing a single function
15
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
16
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company