Important notes: You MUST use this template. If you dont use it your abstract may be rejected.

Do NOT enter author and institution information on this form. You will be able to enter this information online when you submit the abstract. Do NOT write outside the boxes. Any text or images outside the boxes will be deleted. Do NOT alter this form by deleting parts of it or adding new boxes. Simply enter your information into the boxes. The form will be automatically processed if you alter it your submission will not be processed correctly. Save this file in .doc format. Other formats such as .docx (Word 2007) will be rejected.

Title: Inquiry as Impulse in Augustines De Trinitate

Abstract:

(Your abstract must use Normal style and must fit into the box. Do not enter author details)

This paper provides an interpretation of Augustines discussion of inquiry problems in De Trinitate based on his acceptance of the Stoic definition of inquiry as an impulse for finding out (appetitus inveniendi). In Book VIII, Augustine presents a paradox: One must love God in order to come to know him, and yet no one can love what one does not know. It seems, then, that God can neither be loved nor known. This same principle could be applied to any object of inquiry: Unless one loves some potential object of inquiry, i.e., recognizes the worth of that object enough to seek it, the inquiry can never begin. And, yet, how can one love what is unknown? To solve the paradox, Augustine must show how something that is in a sense unknown may be loved so that knowledge of it may be sought. While there has been some discussion of Augustines problem of inquiry, it has previously been assumed that his point of departure is Platos presentation of the paradox of inquiry in the Meno. However, this paper will show that Augustines most influential source is Ciceros Prior Academica, from which he takes his definition of inquiry presented in Book X nearly verbatim. The definition, given by Lucullus, is Stoic, and Augustines approach to inquiry shares certain assumptions of Stoic psychology which are implied in that definition. For the Stoics, an impulse is necessary for action, but any impulse must have certain conditions met before it can take place. Therefore, the failure to meet these conditions results in apraxia, a state of inaction. Augustines presentation and discussion of the problem of inquiry is an attempt to explain how the conditions for the particular impulse that is inquiry to occur are satisfied, and is therefore primarily psychological in nature.