Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Following article is dedicated to all the seekers of truth. It is written especially for the benefit of those Muslim brothers and sisters who can understand Urdu language but cannot read or write it. However, for those who can read Urdu, its my sincere appeal to them to get hold of a copy of Fazail-e-Aamal (FA), published by Farid Book Depot (pvt) Ltd; Darya Ganj, N Delhi. All passages of FA are taken from the said publication.
Brief Introduction
Authored by Maulana Muhammad Zakaria Kandhalwi, the book Fazail-e- Aamaal (FA) is read and followed by a vast number of Muslims for guidance in sub-continent and a few other parts of the world. It consists of two volumes. Says Maulana Zakaria Kandhalvi in the preface of his book: Ke Safar 1357H mein ek marz ki wajah se chand roz ke liye dimaghi kaam* se rok diya gaya. To mujhe khayal hua ke in khali ayyam ko is ba barkat mashgale mein guzaar doon ke agar yeh auraq pasand khatir na hue tab bhi mere yeh khali auqat to behtareen aur ba barkat mashgale mein guzar hi jaaenge. (FA, vol. 1 page no. 17) *Emphasis added. It is evident from the passage quoted above that the book, which is believed by its adherents to lead human beings to Jannah was written by Maulana in days when he was prevented to do dimaghi kaam. Strangely he didnt consider the fact that writing a book, which is supposed to contain guidance for the Ummah should be written with sound mind. Or did he think writing such a book is not a dimaghi kaam? No wonder, the book besides containing some authentic information, also contains a number of weak, concocted, interpolated as well as fabricated ahadith ascribed to the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The companions of the prophet (pbuh), in spite of being so close to him, having seen and heard him so closely, were afraid to narrate ahadith from him lest they might end up making mistakes in quoting his ahadith. Consider the following narrations from Al-Bukhari: 1) Narrated Abdullah bin Az Zubair (RA): I said to my father, "I do not hear from you any narration (Hadith) of Allahs messenger as I hear (his narration) from so and so?" Az-Zubair replied: "I was always with him (the Prophet) and I heard him saying 'Whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally) then (surely) let him occupy his seat in Hell-fire.' (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Hadith # 107) 2) Narrated Anas (RA): The fact which stops me from narrating a great number of Hadiths to you is that the Prophet said: "Whoever tells a lie against me intentionally, then (surely) let him occupy his seat in Hell-fire." (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Hadith # 108) Besides containing concocted and fabricated ahadith, FA also contains baseless and absurd stories of imaginary people, presented in such a way as though they really existed. Quite a few of these stories lead to Shirk, the most heinous sin. The discrepancies present in the book are too many to be discussed in an article. We shall, therefore discuss just a few of them in the light of the Qur'an and the Sunnah.
Lets deal with these arguments one by one. 1) Surely a person will sleep on a bed having bed bugs if he doesnt have any other alternative. Would a person sleep on the bed with four bed bugs after knowing that he has better bed options available? Would he sleep on such a bed if he realizes that he has beds with no bed bugs at all? Moreover, if a person discovers that his bed has bugs in it, wouldnt he make some arrangements to get rid of them? But here it seems people love to sleep with bed bugs! Instead of getting rid of bugs they seem to be demanding beds with bugs. 2) Similarly, a person will eat half cooked rice if he is left without better options. Would a person prefer eating half cooked rice if he has options of eating well cooked Biryani or Pulao? Moreover, a person will ensure the rice doesnt remain half cooked when he cooks it in future so that he doesnt put his stomach in trouble. But here too it seems people are demanding half cooked rice instead. However, in case of FA, its not the matter of our sleep or stomach but its the matter of our aakhirah. We have authentic books such as the glorious Qur'an with its various authentic Tafaseer, the books of ahadith of the Prophet (pbuh) such as Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Riyadhu-saliheen (collection of Quranic verses and authentic ahadith by Imam An-Nawani in two volumes) and Bulughul Maram etc. Why then should we follow FA? Moreover despite presence of a number of books written on FA to highlight the flaws in FA, the people responsible for reproducing and republishing it do not really want to get rid of these mistakes.
From the ayah and the hadith quoted above, it is clear that the knowledge of five things mentioned above, including the land on which a person would die, is with Allah alone. The moment someone says that so and so person knew where to die, he commits Shirk bis-Sifaat.
Allah also says: They are, (in fact), dead, not alive, and they do not perceive when they will be resurrected (Al-Qur'an 16:21) Now, do we believe in what Allah says in the Qur'an or do we believe in what these unknown "Ashkhas" and "Buzurg" say in FA? Another point to be noted here is the selection of words; the Mureed is believed to have said Allah ka har Aashiq zinda rahta hai. Is Aashiq an appropriate word to express love for Allah or His Messenger (pbuh)? We find in FA, words such as Aashiq and Ishq repeatedly being used for Allah and his messenger (pbuh). The word Muhabbat, derived from the root word Hub is much more pure, uncontaminated, decent and respectable as compared to the word Ishq. The word hub with its derivatives is used by Allah and his messenger (pbuh) in the authentic sources of Islam. Words such as Ishq and aashiqui are used more often by poets in romantic Urdu poetry. Will anyone say to his mother main aapka aashiq hoon or to his sister mujhe tum se ishq hai? The answer is No. Why then, when it comes to Allah and his messenger (pbuh) carelessness is shown in selection of words?
Tawassul as it is understood by many of the Muslims of later times, which is calling on the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and seeking his help (or seeking the help of the dead and so-called awliya). This is a form of major shirk, because calling on or seeking help from anyone other than Allaah with regard to something that only Allaah is able to do is a kind of worship, and directing worship to anyone or anything other than Allaah is major shirk. And Allaah knows best. http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/979
..Jab woh sahib wapas aaye to unho ne apni raqam talab ki, walid sahib ne kal ka wada kar liya aur raat ko Qabr-e-ather par hazir hokar aajizi ki. Kabhi qabr sharif ke kareeb dua karte kabhi minbar shareef ke muttasil His need was granted the next morning. (Fazaail-e-Hajj, pg. 169)
Therefore it should be noted that making duaa to anyone other than Allah is Shirk. It is also authentically reported that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said: Let one of you ask his Lord for what he needs, even asking Him for the lace of his shoe if it breaks. (Collected by Tirmidhi, Classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Mishkaat al-Masaabeeh.) http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/84978/shoe%20lace Narrated Urwa 'Aisha said, "The Prophet in his fatal illness said, 'Allah cursed the Jews and the Christians because they took the graves of their Prophets as places for praying.'" 'Aisha added, "Had it not been for that, the grave of the Prophet (pbuh) would have been made prominent but I am afraid it might be taken (as a) place for praying." (Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 2, Hadith # 414)
*Ek Shakhs: The great scholars of Islam, of past and of present have challenged
the Ahadith which were wrongly attributed to the Messenger of Allah (pbuh). After great deal of research, they arrived to conclusions whether particular hadith is Sahih or not. Moreover, even the Aqwal and afaal attributed to the companions of the Prophet, the salaf and the khalaf, are checked for their authenticity. On the other hand, despite a number of stories of FA being based on transmissions through these unknown ashkhaas and buzurgs, which are seriously in conflict with the authentic sources of Islam, the adherents of the book are so ardently trying to support them, no matter if they overrule the authentic teachings of Allah and his messenger, willingly or unwillingly, in doing so. In the story quoted above, we are told that ek shakhs said ALLAH JALLA SHANAHU SE AUR AAP SE SAWAL KARTA HOON.. It further says PHIR MAINE AUR DUAAE MANGI.. We have already discussed the hadith which explains that duaa is a form of Idaadah (worship); therefore it should be directed to Allah ALONE. Worshipping anyone other than Allah or worshipping anyone along with Allah, is SHIRK. It is also narrated authentically that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) even rebuked the man who said to him As Allah and you wish. The Prophet (pbuh) said: Have you
made me and Allah equal? Instead (you should say) as Allah alone wishes. (alMusnad, vol. 2, no. 253.)
Excesses in Religion
Human beings have a tendency of overdoing things. Some people in past have gone to the extreme of rejecting the Prophets while others went to the extreme of elevating them to the level of God. Jews said we are happy with Moses (pbuh) so we dont need Jesus (pbuh) and Christians said we are happy with Jesus (pbuh) so we dont need Muhammad (pbuh). While the Jews rejected the Christ as a messenger, the Christians attributed divinity to him and elevated him to the level of almighty God. Allah says in the glorious Qur'an: O people of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion. (Al-Qur'an 4:171) Consider the following hadith in which the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) is reported to have said: You will follow the ways of those nations who were before you, span by span and cubit by cubit (i.e., inch by inch) so much so that even if they entered a hole of a lizard, you would follow them." We said, "O Allah's Messenger! (Do you mean) the Jews and the Christians?" He said, "Whom else?" (Sahih Bukhari vol. 9, Hadith # 422) The adherents of the book FA may wonder why I am quoting the above-mentioned ayah and hadith. Arent they the ones who are striving so hard to bring the grave worshippers on Sirat-e-Mustaqeem?
Raha Jamal pe tere Hijaab-e-Bashariat Na jana kaun hain kuchh bhi kisi ne Juz Sattar
It is believed that his elegance, his beauty was covered with a mere hijaab of Bashariat whereas nobody knew who he actually was except Sattar (Allah). In other words, he is not considered to be a man but something more than that which nobody knows except Allah. Today, many amongst the adherents of the book object to referring to the Prophet (pbuh) as man despite explicit and clear-cut explanation given by Allah in the Qur'an.
Its my humble request to all those who try to justify the presence of these things in Fazail-e-Aamal to look for a better book for taaleem lest we may fall in the category of those who would imitate the Jews and the Christians inch by inch.
Extremism in Worship
Allah says: Allah intends for you ease, and He does not want to make things difficult for you. (Al Qur'an 2:185) The Prophet (PBUH) said, "Ruined are those who insist on hardship in matters of the Faith.'' He repeated this three times. (Riyaadus Saliheen, Chapter 14, hadith # 144) This Hadith shows disgust against exercises which many Sufis have introduced in religion which deviate from the conduct of the Prophet (PBUH) and encourage selfviolence (Commentary given in Riyaadus Saliheen)
The Prophet (PBUH) came into the mosque and noticed a rope stretched between two poles. He enquired, "What is this rope for?'' He was told: "This is Zainab's rope. When during her voluntary prayer, she begins to feel tired, she grasps it for support". The Prophet (PBUH) said, "Untie it. You should perform prayers so long as you feel active. When you feel tired, you should go to sleep ". (Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Riyadus Saliheen # 146) This hadith deals with following three points according to commentary given in Riyadus Saliheen: 1. It forbids undue strictness and taking support of anything in the course of Salat. 2. If wrong can be corrected by hand, it must be stopped immediately. 3. One should be moderate in `Ibadah and select such times for optional and voluntary prayers when one feels real pleasure in them. End quote. It is sad that despite such strong evidence from the authentic sources of Islam prohibiting extremism in matters of worship, the adherents of the book FA support many weak/concocted/fabricated narrations transmitted through unknown ashkhas and buzurg rendered by Shaikhul Hadith Maulana Zakaria Kandhalvi considering it absolutely permissible to use such narrations to promote virtues (fazaail) even if they are strongly in conflict with the teachings of Allah and his messenger (pbuh).
40 saal ki umr ko pahunch jaata to woh bister uthakar lapet deta hai yani phir sone ka number khatm ho jata hai. ( Fazaail-e-Sadaqat duwwam pg 162) *The words within the brackets are not mine. This is how it is written in FA.
Ek Shakhs says that this buzurg did not sleep for 4 months
Ek shaks (?) kahte hain ke main Aamir bin Abdul Qais (RH) ke saath 4 mahine raha. Maine un ko din mein ya raat mein sote nahi dekha (Fazaaile-e-Sadaqaat, duwwam, pg. 163) Again we come across a story narrated by ek shakhs, an unknown person as counter evidence to promote virtues against the authentic teachings of the prophet (pbuh).
147]. Could the prophet (pbuh) be more explicit than this? Cant we see that these authentic narrations and many given in previous pages strongly oppose the idea of self torture in matters of worship? How can then we still turn a blind eye to what we read from the prophet (pbuh) and prefer to accept the stories of FA which encourage us to perform ibaadah in the fashion forbidden by the prophet (pbuh)?
Ramadan-ul-Mubarak ke waaste kuchh zaroori saman kharid lein, Kahne lagi Allah ka shukr hai jis ne mere waaste saare mahine yaksaan kar diye. Woh HAMESHA din ko roza rakhti. Raat bhar namaz padhti.. (Fazaail-e-Namaz, Pg. 244) The author of the book did not mention how this lady got the special permission from Allah who made saare mahine yaksaan for her to fast. The messenger of Allah (pbuh) has said: By Allah, I fear Allah more than you do, and I am most obedient and dutiful among you to Him, but still I observe fast and break it; perform Salat and sleep at night and take wives. So whoever turns away from my Sunnah does not belong to me" (Sahih Bukhari, vol. 7, hadith # 1) Should we adhere to a book that promotes stories rendered by unknown Soofia ashkaas who make Halaal things replaced by things which are forbidden justifying these promotions for the sake of virtues? Even if someone argues saying these are not unknown soofia, then too books with such stories should not be promoted as these stories oppose the Sunnah of our beloved prophet (pbuh). Though the adherents of the book make big claims that they are the ones who follow the Sunnah of the prophet (pbuh) in all walks of life, yet they support these tales and many tales discussed in previous pages which not only lead to Biddah but also lead to Shirk. Just by beautifying a car outwardly by painting it nicely will not cause it to run on streets if its engine is not taken care of.
Na Jaa zaahir parasti par agar kuchh aql wa daanish hai Chamakta jo nazar aata hai, sab sona nahi hota