Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bruner
A. Introduction: background & framework B. Representational Learning
Three Modes of Representation The sequence of representational stages
C. The Course of Cognitive Growth * Learning by Discovery * Culture & Cognitive Growth D. Theory of instruction: Inductive Method
SJS
Bruner:
going beyond the information given
the outcome of cognitive development => THINKING aim of education => make the learner as autonomous & self-propelled a thinker as possible to understand:
what it means to know & how one comes to know
SJS
Bruners FRAMEWORK
PREMISE: learners must acquire ways of representing
human capabilities, & (b) culturally invented technologies that amplify these capabilities
Cognitive growth has 2 aspects: from the inside out [REPRESENTATIONAL
LEARNING]
from the outside in [ROLE OF CULTURE IN
COGNITIVE GROWTH]
SJS
Jerome S. Bruner
Lev S.Vygostky
Cognitive Growth
inuences
Implications:
Discovery Learning & Inquiry Teaching Culture
1. Learning pulls development. 2. Instruction should be scaffolded in the ZPD. 3. Intersubjective interaction is important
SJS
3 Modes of Representation
1. ENACTIVE: action-based.
mode of representing past events through appropriate motoe responses, e.g. bringing you to place vs. giving directions; air-piano playing
2. ICONIC: image-based.
summarizing events by the selective organization of precepts & of images, by the spatial, temporal & qualitative structures of perceptual eld & their transformed images, e.g., making a map; imagining red-hot ames & black smoke for re
3 Modes of Representation
Mode
Denition Implication for Instruction
use manipulables & tactile instructional strategies with young children to teach concepts with which learners have no prior experience
Enactive
Iconic
accompany instruction with diagrams & other strategies that appeal to the imagination
Symbolic
Using symbol systems such as language, musical notation, & mathematical notation to represent understanding
Use familiar symbol systems when teaching new concepts in a subject where the learner already has prior experience
SJS
3 Modes of Representation
NOT A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE THEORY (aka Piaget): the stages are not delineated, the modes are integrated and only loosely sequential as they "translate" into each other. Inuences from environment amplify internal capabilities of learners
REDEFINES READINESS FOR LEARNING: it is a question of translation, as a learner (even of a very young age) is capable of learning any material so long as the instruction is organized appropriately (vs. Piaget); it is not a question of prior knowledge (vs. Ausubel) ADULTS ALSO MAY GO THROUGH SEQUENCE: when faced with new material, it is efcacious to follow a progression from enactive to iconic to symbolic representation; this holds true even for adult learners.
SEQUENCE & INSTRUCTION: The optimum sequence of instruction is the 3 modes, as any domain of knowledge can be represented in the modes..
Optimal instruction requires knowing the learners prior knowledge Optimal instruction also depends on desired speed of learning: exibility in mode to t what is required (time & SKA constraints) suggests a system of coding to form a hierarchical arrangement of related categories, where each successively higher level of categories becomes more specic (similar to Blooms) & the related idea of instructional scaffolding. In accordance with this understanding of learning, Bruner proposed the spiral curriculum, a teaching approach in which each subject or skill area is revisited at intervals, at a more sophisticated level each time SJS
between genetic predisposition & experience interpersonal interaction (learning is a social enterprise) learner & cultural
Learning by Discovery
DISCOVERY: all forms of obtaining knowledge for oneself by the use of ones own mind. process is important to intellectual development not a random event; information gathering must have connectivity & organization, or else deciency in problem-solving skills
Prerequisites
sufcient prior knowledge guided practice in inquiry: need models (concept attainment model) & teachers must model the conduct of inquiry (not random) reection: must know what they did, if successful or not contrast: leads to cognitive conicts, which then leads to discovery
SJS
SJS
Meaningful [Verbal] Learning Concept Learning Theory of Assimilation Advance Organizers Deductive Method
SJS
Cognitive Organization
theories & procedures Mental modes that guide & govern performance
Instructional Implications:
1. Activate prior knowledge using advance organizers & schema signals. 2. Make instructional materials meaningful with comparative organizers & elaboration. 3. Provide new contexts & examples to apply to prior knowledge.
schema) Tuning (modify an existing schema) Restructuring (develop a new schema by analogy)
SJS
Cognitive Organization
Hierarchical cognitive
Derivative subsumption Correlative subsumption Superordinate learning Combinatorial learning Assimilation Retention
SJS
Ausubels
Developed parallel with, and essentially unaffected by the CIP THEORY. Initially, Ausubel viewed MRL as fundamentally different from thrust of SCHEMA THEORY.
But schema theory developed as similar to MRL. R. Mayer proposed synthesis of verbal learning research
NOW: Ausubels theory not as popular as SCHEMA THEORY in learning research & theory, but some aspects of Ausubels theory is standard part of educational practice.
SJS
Ausubels
Developed parallel with, and essentially unaffected by the CIP THEORY. Initially, Ausubel viewed MRL as fundamentally different from thrust of SCHEMA THEORY.
But schema theory developed as similar to MRL. R. Mayer proposed synthesis of verbal learning research
NOW: Ausubels theory not as popular as SCHEMA THEORY in learning research & theory, but some aspects of Ausubels theory is standard part of educational practice.
SJS
Ausubels
MEANING is at the very core of cognitive experience. occurs when learners actively interpret experiences using certain internal cognitive operations. interaction between cognitive experience ===> THEORY OFoperations & MEANINGFUL RECEPTION LEARNING made 2 distinctions: meaningful learning kinds of learning & rote vs.
SJS
a) rearrange information, b) integrate it with existing cognitive structure, c) reorganize/transform the integrated combination to create desired end product or discover a missing means-end relationship; d) internalize discovered content.
SJS
verbatim memorization no real connection between what was already known & what was memorized process of relating potentially meaningful information to what the learner knows in a nonarbitrary & substantive way
SJS
B. MEANINGFUL LEARNING:
a. Rote Learning
b. Meaningful Learning
SJS
COOKING
includes different types involves preparation
general
stable
stove
oven
determining recipe
assembling ingredients mixing stir whip egg beater beat whip whisk
frying sauteing
roasting baking
specic
unstable
1. Subordinate to
- lower in the structure; - under more general & inclusive anchoring ideas already in memory
SUBSUMPTION
1. Derivative 2. Correlative
SUPERORDINATE COMBINATORIAL
SJS
a1. Poodle
a2. Bulldog
a3. Labrador
a4.Dalmatian
1B. CORRELATIVE
President
Congress
Judiciary
local government
SJS
result of the interaction that takes place between (a) new material to be learned, and (b) the existing cognitive structure
SJS
RETENTION: maintain availability of acquired information, for access at a later time. immediately after meaningful learning, new information is easily accessible stability due to anchorage to relevant concepts in cognitive structure. over time, subsumed ideas less distinct from anchor. When no longer retrievable as separate from anchor, deemed forgotten. forgetting more serious for correlative, superordinate & combinatorial vs. derivative learning. difference between forgetting after rote vs. meaningful learning ==> net gain in cognitive structure in latter.
SJS
ADVANCE ORGANIZERS
concept developed & systematically studied by Ausubel Denitions:
"statement of inclusive concepts to introduce and sum up material that follows" (Woolfolk, 2001). Cognitive instructional strategy used to promote the learning and retention of new information (Ausubel, 1960). method of bridging and linking old information with something new information that is presented prior to learning and that can be used by the learner to organize and interpret new incoming information (Mayer, 2003).
ADVANCE ORGANIZERS
highly useful in process of transferring knowledge: allows
solving or transfer of knowledge to new situations
EXPOSITORY- describe the new content; serves to make appropriate prerequisite knowledge available to the learner by providing new information COMPARATIVE: serve to build external connections with existing knowledge that is relevant to the new information by reminding the learner about prior knowledge are called comparative organizers (Mayer, 2003, 128) NARRATIVE- presents the new information in the form of a story to students. SKIMMING - used to look over the new material and gain a basic overview. GRAPHIC ORGANIZER- visuals to set up or outline the new information. CONCEPT MAPPING
SJS