Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and the outcome of a product.[note 1] The term was originally a loanword from French and was first defined by the Irish-French economist Richard Cantillon. Entrepreneur in English is a term applied to a person who is willing to help launch a new venture or enterprise and accept full responsibility for the outcome. Jean-Baptiste Say, a French economist, is believed to have coined the word "entrepreneur" in the 19th century - he defined an entrepreneur as "one who undertakes an enterprise, especially a contractor, acting as intermediatory between capital and labour".[note 2] A broader definition by Say: "The entrepreneur shifts economic resources out of lower and into higher productivity and greater yield."[clarification
needed]
Contents
[hide]
y y y
y y y y y
1 Leadership attributes 2 Influences, personality traits, and characteristics 3 Types of entrepreneurs o 3.1 Social entrepreneur o 3.2 Serial entrepreneur o 3.3 Lifestyle entrepreneur 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links
improving the community as a whole and are predominately run as non profit schemes. Zahra et al. (2009: 519) said that social entrepreneurs make significant and diverse contributions to their communities and societies, adopting business models to offer creative solutions to complex and persistent social problems.
Entrepreneurship education Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Factors of production Infopreneur Operational risk Venture capital
[edit] Notes
1. ^ Sullivan, Arthur; Steven M. Sheffrin (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 6. ISBN 0-13-063085-3. http://www.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZ3R9&PMDbSiteId=2781&PMDb SolutionId=6724&PMDbCategoryId=&PMDbProgramId=12881&level=4. 2. ^ Guide to Management Ideas and Gurus, Tim Hindle, The Economist, page 77, 3. ^ See William J. Baumol, Robert E. Litan & Carl J. Schramm. Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity 3 (2007), citing generally Peter F. Drucker. Innovation and entrepreneurship (1985) (attributing coining and defining of entrepreneur to Jean-Baptiste Say, a treatise on political economy (1834)); but see Robert H. Brockhaus, Sr., The Psychology of the Entrepreneur, in Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship 40 (Calvin A. Kent, et al. eds. 1982), citing J. S. Mill, Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy (1848). Note that, despite Baumol et al.'s citation, the Drucker book was published in 1986.
[edit] References
1. ^ Harvard Business Publishing Presents: An interview with John Elkington - Key Traits of Social Entrepreneurs.. 2. ^ Business dictionary definition 3. ^ Serial Entrepreneur Quotes 4. ^ Wall Street Journal Online 5. ^ Wadhwa, Vivek. "Is entrepreneurship just about the exit?". http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/12/is-entrepreneurship-just-about-the-exit/. Retrieved 12 June 2010. 6. ^ Peters, M, Frehse, J, Buhalis, D, The importance of lifestyle entrepreneurship: A conceptual study of the tourism industry, PASOS Vol. 7, No. 2 p393-405, 2009 7. ^ Rural Entrepreneurs, Case Studies. "Ecommerce as a business strategy: lessons learned from rural and small town businesses". http://www.ruraleship.org/site/images/research/cp/cs/cs7.pdf. Retrieved 12 June 2010. 8. ^ Goodman, Vivian. "TREPS: The Young Titans of the New Economy". http://www.wksu.org/news/features/familyseries/treps_transcript.html. Retrieved 17 February
Category: General
Rating:
The concept of Entrepreneurship is comparatively new and dynamic. What is Entrepreneurship? "Entrepreneurship can be described as a creative and innovative response to the environment. Such responses can take place in any field of social endeavour business, agriculture, education, social work and the like. Doing new things or doing things that are already being done in a new way is, therefore, a simple definition of entrepreneurship. In this book, however, we shall concentrate on business entrepreneurship. " It would also be advisable to understand the individual qualities of an Entrepreneur this would help us understand the concept better. The following eleven qualities/ attributes are considered to be some of the important ones for a successful entrepreneur on the basis of the research and experience of Behavioral Science Center, Delhi and various other institutions involved in selection of candidates for entrepreneurial development programs conducted by them: a]High level of motivation, b]Moderate Risk-taker c]Self-confident with positive self concept, d]Excellent Leadership qualities e]Good Business acumen f]Managerial competence g]Problem solving attitude h]Flexibility and adaptability i]Realistic approach to planning j]Independence of thought and action k]Ability to perceive opportunities and threats Entrepreneurs are quick to see possibilities for achievement. They are not blinded, as mangers in large, sedate organizations often are, by the in-grown culture in which they are embedded.As we are aware, the new ideas for new products and services often originate in unexpected places. Entrepreneurs are the first one to embark on these innovative ideas. There are several examples such as follows:
1.Credit cards were not invented by banks 2.Instant photography was not started by a large camera manufacturer 3.Large office equipment manufacturer did not create the Xerographic office-copying machine. Entrepreneurs are the people who see the need gap and hence capitalize on the same. An entrepreneur grabs such novel ideas, developed it and pursued its success doggedly with unflagging spirit. Therefore, these people are successful in their venture and are entrepreneurs in the true sense of the word. Thus, entrepreneurs are self-starters and doers who have organize and build successful enterprises.On the other hand we can not call an entrepreneur an opportunist because it is not only the selfish interest that drives him but he is also meets the need of the people.
Entrepreneurship is the act of being an entrepreneur, which can be defined as "one who undertakes innovations, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods". This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a perceived opportunity. The most obvious form of entrepreneurship is that of starting new businesses (referred as Startup Company); however, in recent years, the term has been extended to include social and political forms of entrepreneurial activity. When entrepreneurship is describing activities within a firm or large organization it is referred to as intra-preneurship and may include corporate venturing, when large entities spin-off organizations.[1] According to Paul Reynolds, entrepreneurship scholar and creator of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, "by the time they reach their retirement years, half of all working men in the United States probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years; one in four may have engaged in self-employment for six or more years. Participating in a new business creation is a common activity among U.S. workers over the course of their careers." [2] And in recent years has been documented by scholars such as David Audretsch to be a major driver of economic growth in both the United States and Western Europe. Entrepreneurial activities are substantially different depending on the type of organization and creativity involved. Entrepreneurship ranges in scale from solo projects (even involving the entrepreneur only part-time) to major undertakings creating many job opportunities. Many "high value" entrepreneurial ventures seek venture capital or angel funding (seed money) in order to raise capital to build the business. Angel investors generally seek annualized returns of 20-30% and more, as well as extensive involvement in the business.[3] Many kinds of organizations now exist to support would-be entrepreneurs including specialized government agencies, business incubators, science parks, and some NGOs. In more recent times, the term entrepreneurship has been extended to include elements not related necessarily to business formation activity such as conceptualizations of entrepreneurship as a specific mindset (see also entrepreneurial mindset) resulting in entrepreneurial initiatives e.g. in the form of social entrepreneurship, political entrepreneurship, or knowledge entrepreneurship have emerged.
The entrepreneur is a factor in microeconomics, and the study of entrepreneurship reaches back to the work of Richard Cantillon and Adam Smith in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, but was largely ignored theoretically until the late 19th and early 20th centuries and empirically until a profound resurgence in business and economics in the last 40 years. In the 20th century, the understanding of entrepreneurship owes much to the work of economist Joseph Schumpeter in the 1930s and other Austrian economists such as Carl Menger, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek. In Schumpeter, an entrepreneur is a person who is willing and able to convert a new idea or invention into a successful innovation.[4] Entrepreneurship employs what Schumpeter called "the gale of creative destruction" to replace in whole or in part inferior innovations across markets and industries, simultaneously creating new products including new business models. In this way, creative destruction is largely responsible for the dynamism of industries and long-run economic growth. The supposition that entrepreneurship leads to economic growth is an interpretation of the residual in endogenous growth theory and as such is hotly debated in academic economics. An alternate description posited by Israel Kirzner suggests that the majority of innovations may be much more incremental improvements such as the replacement of paper with plastic in the construction of a drinking straw. For Schumpeter, entrepreneurship resulted in new industries but also in new combinations of currently existing inputs. Schumpeter's initial example of this was the combination of a steam engine and then current wagon making technologies to produce the horseless carriage. In this case the innovation, the car, was transformational but did not require the development of a new technology, merely the application of existing technologies in a novel manner. It did not immediately replace the horsedrawn carriage, but in time, incremental improvements which reduced the cost and improved the technology led to the complete practical replacement of beast drawn vehicles in modern transportation. Despite Schumpeter's early 20th-century contributions, traditional microeconomic theory did not formally consider the entrepreneur in its theoretical frameworks (instead assuming that resources would find each other through a price system). In this treatment the entrepreneur was an implied but unspecified actor, but it is consistent with the concept of the entrepreneur being the agent of x-efficiency. Different scholars have described entrepreneurs as, among other things, bearing risk. For Schumpeter, the entrepreneur did not bear risk: the capitalist did.
For Frank H. Knight [5] (1921) and Peter Drucker (1970) entrepreneurship is about taking risk. The behavior of the entrepreneur reflects a kind of person willing to put his or her career and financial security on the line and take risks in the name of an idea, spending much time as well as capital on an uncertain venture. Knight classified three types of uncertainty.
y y y
Risk, which is measurable statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red color ball from a jar containing 5 red balls and 5 white balls). Ambiguity, which is hard to measure statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red ball from a jar containing 5 red balls but with an unknown number of white balls). True Uncertainty or Knightian Uncertainty, which is impossible to estimate or predict statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red ball from a jar whose number of red balls is unknown as well as the number of other colored balls).
The acts of entrepreneurship are often associated with true uncertainty, particularly when it involves bringing something really novel to the world, whose market never exists. However, even if a market already exists, there is no guarantee that a market exists for a particular new player in the cola category. The place of the disharmony-creating and idiosyncratic entrepreneur in traditional economic theory (which describes many efficiency-based ratios assuming uniform outputs) presents theoretic quandaries. William Baumol has added greatly to this area of economic theory and was recently honored for it at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Economic Association.[6] The entrepreneur is widely regarded as an integral player in the business culture of American life, and particularly as an engine for job creation and economic growth. Robert Sobel published The Entrepreneurs: Explorations Within the American Business Tradition in 1974. Zoltan Acs and David Audretsch have produced an edited volume surveying Entrepreneurship as an academic field of research,[7] and more than a hundred scholars around the world track entrepreneurial activity, policy and social influences as part of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)[8] and its associated reports. Though Entrepreneurs are thought to have many of the same character traits as leaders,[clarification needed] , involve particular psychological dispositions, or operate in purely business spheres of life, recent European theorising on the subject has suggested that, come the era of neo-liberalism and 'big society' politics that promote conceptualising humans as economic agents per se, normal, everyday people usually marginalised from the term 'entrepreneur' are too involved in the very same kind of processes that 'big business', proper entrepreneurs are involved with. Entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurship, as such, might be enacted by anybody, encountering as they do economic uncertainty on an everyday basis.
Contents
[hide]
y y
y y y y y y
3 Financial Bootstrapping 4 Traditional Financing 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links
market demands and are not currently being supplied. In the 20th century, economist Joseph Compete (1883-1950) focused on how the entrepreneur's drive for innovation and improvement creates upheaval and change. Compete viewed entrepreneurship as a force of "creative destruction." The entrepreneur carries out "new combinations," thereby helping render old industries obsolete. Established ways of doing business are destroyed by the creation of new and better ways to do them. Business expert Peter Drunker (1909-2005) took this idea further, describing the entrepreneur as someone who actually searches for change, responds to it, and exploits change as an opportunity. A quick look at changes in communications from typewriters to personal computers to the Internet illustrates these ideas. Most economists today agree that entrepreneurship is a necessary ingredient for stimulating economic growth and employment opportunities in all societies. In the developing world, successful small businesses are the primary engines of job creation, income growth, and poverty reduction. Therefore, government support for entrepreneurship is a crucial strategy for economic development. As the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OE CD) said in 2003, "Policies to foster entrepreneurship are essential to job creation and economic growth." Government officials can provide incentives that encourage entrepreneurs to risk attempting new ventures. Among these are laws to enforce property rights and to encourage a competitive market system. The culture of a community also may influence how much entrepreneurship there is within it. Different levels of entrepreneurship may stem from cultural differences that make entrepreneurship more or less rewarding personally. A community that accords the highest status to those at the top of hierarchical organizations or those with professional expertise may discourage entrepreneurship. A culture or policy that accords high status to the "self-made" individual is more likely to encourage entrepreneurship. This overview is the first in a series of one-page essays about the fundamental elements of entrepreneurship. Each paper combines the thinking of mainstream economic theorists with examples of practices that are common to entrepreneurship in many countries. The series attempts to answer: Why and how do people become entrepreneurs? Why is entrepreneurship beneficial to an economy? How can governments encourage
Types
Idealist
The idealist entrepreneur is the most common type of entrepreneur shown above. He/She likes innovation and enjoys working on something new or creative or something personally meaningful.
Optimizers
The optimizer entrepreneur comes in a close second and is content with the personal satisfaction of simply being a business owner. I think everyone would have some sort of satisfaction being a business owner but if thats what mostly feels important then I guess you fall here.
Hard Workers
The hard workers entrepreneur category includes persons who enjoy putting in long hours to build a larger more profitable business. They like the challenge it presents and of course reap the most rewards if the business turns out to be a multi-million dollar enterprise. Hard work comes with all businesses but as we now see not everyone works hard for the business to grow as this group of entrepreneurs does.
Jugglers
The juggler entrepreneur likes the concept that the business gives them a chance to handle everything themselves. They are usually people with lots of energy and exist on the pressure of meeting deadlines, paying bills and of course making payroll. Who doesnt like pressure? J Last minute deadlines are lovely! Im sure a lot of you have ended up in a situation where the deadline is approaching quickly. Maybe youre a juggler
Sustainers
The sustainers entrepreneur category consists of people who like the thought of balancing work and a personal life. Most often they do not wish the business to grow too large where it will cut into their personal life too much. These guys just need enough to survive. No big hopes and dreams of a multinational corporation or interviews on The Big Idea J So there you have it five categories of entrepreneurs. Ive been trying to figure out which category best describes me, but I think I have attributes of the first four types. I love creativity and innovation so am I an idealist? I think everyone would feel satisfaction as a business owner, a natural sense of pride would always come with entrepreneurship.
I definitely would love to see any business venture I undertake grow as large as it possibly can so then Im a hard worker? Yet I work well under pressure Id say I thrive on it a bit so then Im a juggler. I guess I am hybrid entrepreneur. What type of Entrepreneur are you? So thats it, if you likes this post please subscribe to my rss feed.