Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear Sir, Sub: Selection process for Central Information Commissioners. Kindly find attached PO # 74R 700211 towards fees for application under RTI Act, 2005. Kindly provide the following information from June 2005 till current date: Please provide authenticated / attested true copies of below-mentioned items: a) Minutes of meetings held for selection of each of Central Information Commissioners (including Chief Information Commissioner). Include file notings if any. b) List of members of the Committee (with names and designations) which selected every Information Commissioner as per Sec. 15 (3) of RTI Act 2005. c) All correspondence with reference to application, proposing, nominating, soliciting application, soliciting opinions of others on appointment of each Information Commissioner etc. In short, provide copies of ALL correspondence in this regard. d) Names and designations of other candidates who applied for the post. e) The guidelines / circulars / instructions / rules etc. by which the selection process was carried out. f) If advertisements, notices, circulars or any other form of communication were issued inviting nominations/ applications for the post of Information Commissioner / Chief Information Commissioner, please give copies. Also give copies of each and every response received to above-mentioned call for nominations/applications. g) Medical reports, due diligence reports and other expert opinion sought or furnished to establish that each candidate was deemed fit to be appointed to this Office, being sound in mind and body as required under Sec. 17(3)(d) of RTI Act 2005. h) Written opinions etc given in favour of or against the present Information Commissioners. This includes file notings or any other form of records. (i) Copies of Vigilance clearance obtained for each Information Commissioner. Kindly provide the above information ASAP. Best regards.
Girish Mittal 1305 Dhruv, Ashok Van, Borivali East, Mumbai 400 066 Tel. 09323462428 Email: mittalgirish@gmail.com
42
43
44
45
Contents
Girish Mittals RTI application & DoPTs response CIC A N Tiwaris self-selection methods CIC Satyananda Mishras self-selection methods Constitutional safeguards against self-selection
Page no.
3, 42 - 45 4 - 22 23 - 38 39-40
In response to his RTI application dated 25 May 2009, RTI applicant Girish Mittal recieved, in three installments, roughly 350 pages from DoPTs files. Many of these papers were disclosed following the First Appeal order on 19 November 2009. This was information that DoPT had earlier denied having in its possession; Chief CIC Wajahat Habibullah had upheld the denial in December 2008. (In earlier years, he had loosely cited the Official Secrets Act for denying this information.) However, not all papers have been given to Girish. There are some crucial missing links, such as letters from PMO initiating the search for suitable candidates in the first round of selections, as also agenda papers and minutes of meetings where the first batch of Information Commissioners were selected. For procuring these missing papers, Girish has already filed second appeal. From page 4 to page 21 of this document, we have detailed, in a chronological and logical order, the documents of the self-selection process of former DoPT Secretary A N Tiwari. From page 22 to 36, we have shown the documents pertaining to the self-selection of former DoPT Secretary Satyananda Mishra .
Gazette notification
A N Tiwari
Resume
submitted on
20 July 2005
A N Tiwari resume
10
11
12
14
15
16
Example 2: M M Ansari
10 October, 05
17
Example 2: M M Ansari
21 October, 05
18
Example 2: M M Ansari
31 October, 05
19
20
Example 1: A N Tiwari
21
Example 1: A N Tiwari
26 December, 05
(i.e. Two-and-half months after offer letter)
22
Please ask: Why did the post of Information Commissioner have to wait 77 days for him? Was Mr Tiwari really so important?
Enough said about Mr Tiwari. Now let us turn our attention to Satyananda Mishra, DoPT Secretary. In June 08, PMO asked whether there was a need to expand the Commission. To this, Mr Mishra wrote a self-serving note about the urgent need to appoint six more Commissioners. In July 08, PMO specifically requested him to propose a panel of names for appointment of four more Information Commissioners. So what did Mr Mishra do? Despite having a wealth of suitable candidates to choose from, he proposed only five names... including his own name. Thus, he reduced his chances of being rejected to 20% at the outer most! Isnt he a clever man? In August 08, PMs selecting committee rewarded his cleverness by making him an Information Commissioner.
23
24
25
Satyananda
Mishra
26
27
Satyananda Mishras
Bio-Data
28
Satyananda Mishras
Bio-Data
29
30
31
32
33
Satyananda Mishra gets offer letter, addressed to him from his own DoPT colleague.
34
35
And so they all live happily ever after... But wait a minute! What about those others who had applied to Satyanand Mishra in his capacity as DoPT Secretary?
36
For example, what about Lt. Gen Arvind Mahajan who had sent his application to Mr Mishra on 8th Jan 08?
37
What about all those others who kept sending their applications, but were clueless about how, when and where to send them, because they were not the DoPT Secretary, or in his inner circle? Tough luck! Better luck next time, old chaps. (But there will be no next time, because most candidates are well past 60 years already.)
38
Why does Article 319 say all this? Because Public Service Commissions are bodies that help in selections similar to DoPTs role in selecting CIC/ICs. Article 320 describes the role of Public Service Commissions:
320. (1) It shall be the duty of the Union and the State Public Service Commissions to conduct examinations for appointments to the services of the Union and the services of the State respectively. (2) It shall also be the duty of the Union Public Service Commission, if requested by any two or more States so to do, to assist those States in framing and operating schemes of joint recruitment for any services for which candidates possessing special qualifications are required.
So isnt it self-evident that, following the same constitutional principle, DoPT Secretaries must not be eligible for appointment to the post of CIC/IC?
39
And here is what Article 16 says about right to equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of State employment:
16. (1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State. (2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State.
Fellow citizens, do you and I have as much opportunity to become Information Commissioners as Messrs A N Tiwari & Satyananda Mishra? You decide.
40