IPC QuestionNo 7 -X takes a girl out of the custody of her lawful gaurdians.

Which of the following statement is a complete defence if X is charged under sec 361 of the IPC for kidnapping on the ground that the girl was below the age of eighteen years when taken away Answer1: That girl was a student in a college and could understand w hat was right or wrong for her Answer2: the girl was maltreated by the guardian and A promosed her a better life Answer3: The girl lookd more that 18 years of age and accused had satisfied himself that she was more than 18 years of age Answer4: None of above Correct Answer: The girl lookd more that 18 years of age and accused had satisfied himself that she was more than 18 years of age

QuestionNo 16 -L a surgoen amptutates the right hand ring finger of M, a 14 years old beggar with the latter's conse nt and in good faith that this would enable M to get more beggary amount(Alms) Answer1: L commits no offence as was done with Y's consent Answer2: L commits offence as the consent of a child is not of no avail Answer3: L commits no offence as the act was done in good faith and with M consent Answer4: L is not exempted from criminal liability as the act was done in no good faith within the meaning of IPC Correct Answer: L is not exempted from criminal liability as the act was done in no good faith within the meaning of IPC

QuestionNo 2 -A in support of just claim which B has against Z for one thousand rupees falsely swears on a trail that he heard Z admit the justice of B claim. A has given. Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Information. Statement. False evidence True evidence

Correct Answer: False evidence

QuestionNo 14 -X ,Y,Z are joint owner of same property .X removes the property Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: X X X X is is is is not guilty of the theft as property is also belong to X guilty of theft as X is just a joint owner and not sole owner guilty of breach of trust guilty of criminal breach of trust

Correct Answer: X is guilty of theft as X is just a joint owner and not sole owner

QuestionNo 24 -The right to private defence is Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Unrestricted Subject to restriction contained in section 99 IPC Subject to restriction contained in Chapter IV IPC None of above

Correct Answer: Subject to restriction contained in section 99 IPC

QuestionNo 24 -The right to private defence is Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Unrestricted Subject to restriction contained in section 99 IPC Subject to restriction contained in Chapter IV IPC None of above

Correct Answer: Subject to restriction contained in section 99 IPC

QuestionNo 3 -A makes a false entry in his shop book for the purpose of using it as corroborative evidence in court of justice. A has fabricated false evidence under which of the following sections: Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. 191 189 192 193 IPC IPC IPC IPC

Correct Answer: Sec. 191

QuestionNo 19 -What test was applied by the Supreme Court in he State of Maharashtra Vs Mohd Yakub in order to distinguish attempt to commit an offence from its mere preparation Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Impossibility Social danger Locus penitentie Proximity

Correct Answer: Proximity

QuestionNo 8 -A hangman who hang the prisoners per suant to the order of court is exempt from criminal liability according to which of the following provision Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Sec Sec Sec Sec 76 77 78 79 IPC IPC IPC IPC

Correct Answer: Sec 76 IPC QuestionNo 10 -Which section of IPC has been held to be invalid and unconstitutional by the supreme court in Mithu Vs State of punjab Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Sec 303 IPC Sec 310 IPC Sec 322 IPC Sec324 IPC

Correct Answer: Sec 303 IPC

QuestionNo 21 -A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deamed to have caused his death, by virtue of Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Explaination Explaination Explaination Explaination I to section 299 I to section 300 II to section 299 III to section 299

Correct Answer: Explaination I to section 300

QuestionNo 27 -A knows that B is suffering from a disease in his head and also that if a blow is given to B on his chest, it is likely to cause his death.Knowing it A gives a blow to B on his head and cause death and caused death of B.A is Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Guilty of murder Culpabale homicide Guilty of no offence Guilty of causing hurt only

Correct Answer: Guilty of murder

QuestionNo 9 -In context of the exception of grave and sudden provocation, which of the following is correct Answer1: Provocation should not be voluntarily provoked by the offender Answer2: Lawful exercise of the right of private defence does not give provocation Answer3: Lawful exercise of powers by a public servant in obedience to the law does not amount to provocation Answer4: all the above Correct Answer: All of above

QuestionNo 18 -The distinction between culpabale homicide and murder was set out in which of the following cases Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: R. v. Inder Singh Indu Beg Case Grover. v state of punjab R. v Govinda

Correct Answer: R. v Govinda

QuestionNo 1 -A, soldier, fires on a mob by the order of his superior officer, in conformity with the command of law. A has committed Answer1: Offence with in sec. 76 IPC. Answer2: No offence within sec. 76 IPC. Answer3: Offence within sec. 80 IPC. Answer4: No offence within sec. 80 IPC. Correct Answer: No offence within sec. 76 IPC.

QuestionNo 5 -Culpable homicide is not murder when the person whose death is caused, being above the age of eighteen years, suffers death or takes the risk of death with his own consent. The statement is an exception to which of the following section of IPC Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. 301 300 302 303 IPC IPC IPC IPC

Correct Answer: Sec. 300 IPC

QuestionNo 23 -The Maxim de minimus non curat lex denotes Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Law would not take action on small and trifling matters Law would not take action on serios actions. Law does not ignore any act which causes ev en a slight harm None of above

Correct Answer: Law would not take action on small and trifling matters

QuestionNo 17 -Voluntary intoxication Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Makes an offence more serious or increase the gravity of an offence Is a week defence to a criminal charge Is no excuse for the commission of an offence reduces the gravity of all offences

Correct Answer: Is no excuse for the commission of an offence

QuestionNo 15 -Lunacy is defence if Answer1: mind Answer2: mind Answer3: intervals Answer4: the act is committed during the period when person was of unsound the act is committed during the period when person was of sound it is immeterial whether the act was commited in lucid or non -lucid None of above

Correct Answer: the act is committed during the period when person was of unsound mind

QuestionNo 22 -A boy over 11 years but below 12 years of age picked up knife and proceeding towards with a threating gesture saying that he would cut him into pieces actaully stab him to death Answer1: the boy will not be guilty, as a child under 12 years of age cannot be guilty of an offence. Answer2: the boy will be guilty, because he had attained suffient maturity to judge the nature and consequences of an act. Answer3: The boy will not be guilty of an offence Answer4: None of above Correct Answer: the boy will be guilty, because he had attained suffient maturity to judge the nature and consequences of an act.

QuestionNo 20 -A puts Z into fear of hurt and dishonestly induces Z to sign a blank cheque and deliver it to A.Z signs and deliver it to A. A is guilty of Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Theft Extortion Robbery Attempt to commit extortion

Correct Answer: Extortion

QuestionNo 11 -In which of the following case the right of private defence of property defence of property does not extends to causing death Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: Mischief by fire Dacoity Housebreaking by night House tresspass

Correct Answer: House Tresspass

QuestionNo 4 -A lays sticks and turn over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused, Z believing the ground to be firm, treade on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of Answer1: Murder. Answer2: Culpable Homicide Answer3: Attempt to commit murder. Answer4: None of the above. Correct Answer: Culpable Homicide

QuestionNo 26 -Twelve persons were charged for offence under section 302/149 IPC, out of which 8 were aquitted, the rest 4 Answer1: Answer2: Answer3: Answer4: cannot be convicted for the offence under section 302/149 IPC Cannot be convicted for offence under section 149 of IPC Cannot be convicted for offence under section 302 of IPC All of above

Correct Answer: All of above

QuestionNo 25 -Abetment is complete as soon as Answer1: The abettor has incited another to commit an offence Answer2: The person instigated has done some overt act towards the commission of the offence Answer3: The offence abetted has been committed Answer4: Both Answer 1 and Answer 2 Correct Answer: The abettor has incited another to commit an offence