Professional Documents
Culture Documents
research
Visibility Report
Key Takeaways
Executive Summary
With spend on consumer security software forecasted to reach an all time high this year and consumers performing tens of millions of anti-virus searches per month, we analyzed the top ten anti-virus software companies natural search visibility and search traffic acquisition strategies over a one year period. The group was largely invisible with only 5% of competitive industry keywords (keywords at least the companies were bidding on) and 6% of their most expensive paid keywords, appearing in the top 5 search results.
2. Only 5% of competitive
anti-virus industry keywords (keywords at least the companies were bidding on) appeared in the top 5 natural search results.
3. Only 6% of the
anti-virus companies 1000 most expensive paid keywords appeared in the top 5 search results.
Figure 1
Conductor, Inc.
Figure 2
Conductor, Inc.
AVG was the traffic leader due in large part to their capturing a larger percentage of the millions of free anti-virus searches than their competitors, in spite of their competitions pursuit of the same traffic. Trend Micro, however, while ranking third in paid results for free anti-virus, was only eighth to AVGs number one in natural results for the same term. Poor Natural Search Visibility for the Most Expensive & Competitive Paid Keywords Next we analyzed keyword visibility, by extracting the individual companys 1000 most expensive paid keywords from Internet research firm Spyfu (for the seven vendors bidding on a minimum of one thousand keywords). We also created a list of 731 most competitive paid keywords that nearly half the companys were bidding on. We tracked the natural search position of both sets of keywords to gauge the vendors natural search visibility of their most expensive and competitive terms, operating on the principle that the companies were voting with their wallets in spending on these keywords and they would want them visible in natural search Overall, we found visibility to be poor, with the companies on average appearing in the top five search results for their 1000 most expensive keywords only 6% of the time and only 5% of the time for their competitive keywords (see Figure 3 and Figure 4). By comparison, the travel industry, another highly competitive online industry weve analyzed, appeared in the top 5 search results for their competitive keywords 24% of the time.
Conductor, Inc.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Kaspersky stood out as an SEO outlier. Despite being a distant fifth in overall search traffic, investing virtually nothing in paid search, they were the second most visible for their 1000 most expensive keywords and third most visible for their competitive keywords. Although McAfee had the largest percentage of most competitive and expensive keywords in the top 5, both Symantec and Kaspersky had a significantly higher percentage of borderline keywords, keywords in the 6-50 range, a percentage of which could be on the verge of moving into top visibility positions. Conductor, Inc.
Methodologies
Companies: The software vendors we studied were the top most popular anti-virus packages on CNET.com and the Top Ten Reviews website, http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/. Websites: We analyzed a single primary domain for each company. To determine the companys domain, we searched for the companys brand name in Google and used the first company owned domain returned. The table below shows the websites analyzed: Company Norton Trend Micro Panda F-Secure McAfee AVG Kaspersky Vipre Avira Bit Defender Domain symantec.com trendmicro.com pandasecurity.com f-secure.com mcafee.com avg.com kaspersky.com sunbeltsoftware.com avira.com bitdefender.com
Natural vs. Paid Visits: The company sites total visits and natural search versus paid search breakdown were obtained from Internet research firm Comscore. Daily Paid Spend/Competitive Paid Keywords: The software companies common keywords, 1000 most expensive keywords, and daily spend was obtained from Internet research firm Spyfu. Daily spend is an average of the monthly spend from September 2008-September 2009 divided by 30. Monthly spend is the midpoint between the bottom and top spend range provided by Spyfu. Conductor, Inc.
Conductor, Inc.