Professional Documents
Culture Documents
/
h
a
)
C R ; r = - 0 , 0 3
V L ; r = - 0 , 4 4
B U ; r = 0 , 9 5 * * *
B
y = 1 3 , 7 5 x + 2 8 , 6 2
r = 0 , 7 7 * *
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 2 3 4
L A I ( m
2
l / m
2
t )
C R ; r = 0 , 9 6 * * *
V L ; r = 0 , 9 7 * * *
B U ; r = 0 , 9 2 * * *
C
y = 5 , 6 7 x + 3 0 , 8 5
r = 0 , 8 6 * *
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1
3
5 7
C R ; r = 0 , 9 9 * * *
V L ; r = 0 , 9 8 * * *
B U ; r = 0 , 8 1 *
D
y = 1 , 1 3 x + 5 0 , 7 7
r = 0 , 1 5
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 3 5 7
C R ; r = 0 , 9 9 * * *
V L ; r = 0 . 9 4 * * *
B U ; r = 0 , 8 5 * *
L A I ( m
2
l / m
2
t )
N
S
T
T
(
t
/
h
a
)
th 1. Tng quan gia ch s din tch l (LAI) vi nng sut thc thu (NSTT) cc ging la CR203
(trng), Vit lai 20 (en) v Bc u 903 (xm) vi cc mc phn 0N (vung), 60 N(trn), 120N (thoi) v
180N (tam gic), ti cc giai on sau cy 2 tun (A), nhnh hu hiu (B), tr (C) v chn sp (D).
*, ** v ***: tng ng ngha mc xc sut 95; 99 v 99,9%.
A
y = 2,64x + 22,58
r =
**
20
40
60
80
5 10 15 20
CR;r= 0,94***
VL;r= 0,95***
BU;r= 0,90***
B
y = 0,05x + 52,93
r =
20
40
60
80
10 20 30 40 50
N
S
T
T
(
t
/
h
a
)
CR; r= 0,73**
VL;r= 0,93***
BU;r= 0,99***
C
y = 0,31x + 46,55
r = -0.07
20
40
60
80
0 10 20 30 40
CR;r= 0,67*
VL;r= 0,74**
BU;r= -0.11***
D
y = -0,04x +
r = -
20
40
60
80
0 10 20 30 40
CGR (g/m
2
t/ngy)
CR;r= -0.186
VL;r= 0,79**
BU;r= 0.98***
CGR (g/m
2
t/ngy)
N
S
T
T
(
t
/
h
a
)
th 2. Tng quan gia tc tch lu cht kh (CGR) vi nng sut thc thu (NSTT) cc
ging la CR203 (trng), Vit lai 20 (en) v Bc u 903 (xm) vi cc mc phn 0N (vung), 60
N(trn), 120N (thoi) v 180N (tam gic), ti cc giai on sau cy 2 tun (A), nhnh hu hiu
(B), tr (C) v chn sp (D).
*, ** v ***: tng ng ngha mc xc sut 95; 99 v 99,9%.
y = 0,35x + 5,87
r = 0,81**
20
40
60
80
90 120 150 180 210
CR;r= 0,99***
VL;r= 0,94***
BU;r= 0,96***
S ht/bng
y = 0,15 x + 12,49
r = 0,68*
20
40
60
80
200 250 300 350
S bng/m
2
CR;r= 0,99***
VL;r= 0,98***
BU;r= 0,98***
N
S
T
T
(
t
/
h
a
)
y = -0,55x + 102,69
r = 0,30
20
40
60
80
75 80 85 90 95 100
T l ht chc (%)
CR;r= 0,94***
VL;r= 0,92***
BU;r= -0,98***
CR;r= 0,89***
VL;r= -0,68*
BU;r= -0,23
y = -0,18x + 58,60
r = 0,01
40
60
80
N
S
T
T
(
t
/
h
a
)
20
20
22 24 26 28 30
Khi lng 1000ht (g)
tt c cc mc N, nng sut ht c tng quan vi s bng/m
2
mc c ngha trong tt c
cc ging ( th 3). Nh vy khi tng lng m bn, kh nng nhnh hu hiu la lai tng
mnh hn so vi la thun (Sarker v cs, 2002; Phm Vn Cng v cs, 2004b). Nng sut ht
ca cc ging t l thun vi s ht/bng nhng khng tng quan vi t l ht chc hay khi lng
1000 ht ( th 3). iu ny c th do tng lng m bn giai on u ca qu trnh sinh
trng lm tng s hoa phn ho la lai cao hn so vi la thun (Saitoh v cs, 2000; Nagata v
cs, 2001). Tuy nhin tng quan gia nng sut v s ht trn bng (r= 0,81) cht hn tng quan
gia nng sut ht vi s bng/m
2
(r = 0,68), nh vy, khi tng lng m bn th vic tng s ht/
bng la lai cao hn so vi la thun v ng vai tr quan trng hn trong vic tng nng sut
la. Kt qu ny ph hp vi cc cng trnh nghin cu trc (Govinda v Siddiq, 1986; Virmani,
1994; Kobayashi v cs, 1995).
2
th 3. Tng quan gia cc yu t cu thnh nng sut vi nng sut thc thu (NSTT) cc ging la
CR203 (trng), Vit lai 20 (en) v Bc u 903 (xm) vi cc mc phn 0N (vung), 60 N(trn), 120N (thoi)
v 180N (tam gic), ti cc giai on sau cy 2 tun (A), nhnh hu hiu (B), tr (C) v chn sp (D).
*, ** v ***: tng ng ngha mc xc sut 95; 99 v 99,9%.
mc c ngha trong tt c
cc ging ( th 3). Nh vy khi tng lng m bn, kh nng nhnh hu hiu la lai tng
mnh hn so vi la thun (Sarker v cs, 2002; Phm Vn Cng v cs, 2004b). Nng sut ht
ca cc ging t l thun vi s ht/bng nhng khng tng quan vi t l ht chc hay khi lng
1000 ht ( th 3). iu ny c th do tng lng m bn giai on u ca qu trnh sinh
trng lm tng s hoa phn ho la lai cao hn so vi la thun (Saitoh v cs, 2000; Nagata v
cs, 2001). Tuy nhin tng quan gia nng sut v s ht trn bng (r= 0,81) cht hn tng quan
gia nng sut ht vi s bng/m
2
(r = 0,68), nh vy, khi tng lng m bn th vic tng s ht/
bng la lai cao hn so vi la thun v ng vai tr quan trng hn trong vic tng nng sut
la. Kt qu ny ph hp vi cc cng trnh nghin cu trc (Govinda v Siddiq, 1986; Virmani,
1994; Kobayashi v cs, 1995).
4. KT LUN 4. KT LUN
Khi tng lng phn m bn, LAI , DM v CGR ca la lai tng vt tri so vi ging la
thun, c bit giai on sau cy 4 tun.
Khi tng lng phn m bn, LAI , DM v CGR ca la lai tng vt tri so vi ging la
thun, c bit giai on sau cy 4 tun.
Khi tng lng m bn, nng sut ca cc ging la u tng, tuy nhin nng sut ca la lai
tng nhiu hn nng sut ca la thun.
Khi tng lng m bn, nng sut ca cc ging la u tng, tuy nhin nng sut ca la lai
tng nhiu hn nng sut ca la thun.
Nng sut ht ca cc ging la th nghim cc mc phn bn c tng quan thun mc
c ngha vi LAI v CGR giai on u ca qu trnh sinh trng, v s bng/m
2
v s ht/bng.
Nng sut ht ca cc ging la th nghim cc mc phn bn c tng quan thun mc
c ngha vi LAI v CGR giai on u ca qu trnh sinh trng, v s bng/m
2
v s ht/bng.
Ti liu tham kho Ti liu tham kho
Pham Van Cuong., Murayama, S. and Kawamitsu, Y (2003). Heterosis for photosynthesis, dry
matter production and grain yield in F
1
hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) from thermo-sensitive
genic male sterile line cultivated at different soil nitrogen levels. Environ. Control in Biol. 41
(4) : page 335-345.
Pham Van Cuong., Murayama, S. and Kawamitsu, Y (2003). Heterosis for photosynthesis, dry
matter production and grain yield in F
1
hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) from thermo-sensitive
genic male sterile line cultivated at different soil nitrogen levels. Environ. Control in Biol. 41
(4) : page 335-345.
Pham Van Cuong., Murayama, S., Ishimine, Y., Kawamitsu, Y., Motomura, K. and Tsuzuki, E
(2004a). Sterility of TGMS line, heterosis for grain yield and related characters in F1 hybrid
rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 1 (4) : 22-29.
Pham Van Cuong, Murayama, S; Kawamitsu, Y., Motomura, K, and Miyagi, S (2004b). Heterosis
for Photosynthetic and Morphological characters in F1 hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) from a
thermo-sensitive genic male sterile line at different growth stages. Japanese Journal of
Tropical Agriculture 48 (3) : 137-148.
Bi nh Dinh, Nguyn Vn B (1995). Phn bn cho la lai (TG) trn mt s loi t trng la
Vit Nam. Vin Th nhng-Nng ha, Tr 5-8.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second
Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1-680.
Govinda, R.K. and Siddiq, E.A (1986). Hybrid vigour in rice with reference to
morphophysiological components of yield and root density. SABRAO J. 18 : 1-7.
Kobayashi, M., Kubota, F., Hirao, K. and Agata, W (1995). Characteristic of photosynthesis and matter partitioning
in leading hybrid rice, Oryza sativa L., Bred in China. J. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ . 39 (3-4). 175-182.
Kumura, S (1995). Physiology of high yielding rice plants from the viewpoint of dry matter
production and its partitioning. In T. Mastuo, K, K.Kumazawa, R, R. Ishii, K.Ishihara and
H.Hirata eds. Science of the Rice Plant. Vol. 2. Physiology. Food and Agriculture Policyb
Research Center, Tokyo. 704-736.
Murayama, S., Miyazato, K. and Nose, A (1987). Studies on matter production of F1 hybrid in rice.
I. Heterosis in the single leaf photosynthetic rate. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 56 : 198-203.
Nagata, K., Yoshinaga, S., Takanashi, J. and Terao, T (2001). Effect of dry matter production,
translocation of nonstructural carbohydrates and nitrogen application on grain filling in rice
cultivar Takanari, a cultivar bearing a large number of spikelets. Plant Prod. Sci. 4 : 173-183.
Sarker, M.A.Z., Murayama, S., Ishimine, Y. and Tsuzuki, E (2002). Effect of nitrogen fertilization
on photosynthetic characters and dry matter production in F1 hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Plant Prod. Sci. 5 : 131-138.
Saitoh, K., Doi,T. and Kuroda, T (2000). Effects of nitrogen fertilization on dark respiration and
growth efficiency of field grow rice plants. Plant Pro Sci. 3: 238-242.
Song, X., Agata, W. and Kawamitsu, Y (1990). Studies on dry matter and grain production of F1 hybrid
rice in China. II. Characteristics of grain production. Jananes Journal of Crop Sci. 59 : 29-33.
Trn Thc Sn v ng Vn Hin (1995). Xc nh lng phn bn thch hp bn cho la trn t
ph sa Sng Hng c nng sut cao v hiu qu kinh t. NXB Nng nghip, 1995.
Virmani, S.S (1994). Heterosis and Hybrid Rice Breeding. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1-189.
Yamauchi, M. and Yoshida, S (1985). Heterosis in net photosynthetic rate, leaf area, tillering, and
some physiological characters of 35 F1 rice hybrids. J. Expt. Bot. 36 : 274-280.
Yang, X., Zhang, W. and Ni, W (1999). Characteristics of nitrogen nutrition in hybrid rice. In
Hybrid Rice. IRRI, Los Banos. 5-8.
Yoshida, S (1981). Fundamentals of rice crop science. Intl. Rice Res. Inst. 269.
Yuan, L.P (1987). Strategy conception of hybrid rice breeding. Hybrid Rice. 1 : 1-3.
Wada, G (1969). The effects of nitrogenous nutrition on the yield determining process of rice
plants. Bull. Natl. Inst. Agric. Sci. 16 : 27-167.
V Hu Ym (1995). Phn bn v cch bn phn. NXB Nng nghip, Tr 14-20