Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CITY STATE ZIP ________________________________________ PHONE _______________________________________________ Voter Registration Statement: I __________________________________ am registered to vote in: (print your name) City: ________________________________ County: _____________________________ State: ________________ DATE : ________________________ Governor ________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________ City, State, Zip ____________________________________________ Dear Governor _____________________________ : UNITED STATES CODES TITLE 18CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 115TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES 2382. Misprision of treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.[1] CAVEAT: THIS INFORMATION IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OF ANY CANDIDATE. Chronology of Points and Authorities: 1776 Declaration of Independence 1787 US Constitution 1855 Act of Congress XXII 1874 Minor v Happersett 1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark 1906 Perkins v Elg 1907 George W. Romney INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II 1922 Cable Act 1931 Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr 1936 John Sidney McCain III 1939 Perkins v Elg 1947 Mitt Romney 1948 British Nationality Act 1952 US/British Treaty 1961 Barack Hussein Obama II born 1998 Malia Ann Obama born 2001 Natasha (Sasha) Obama born 1. 1776 Declaration of Independence That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved[2]
2 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II offered to or attack made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever. Whoever, then, was one of the people of either of these States when the Constitution of the United States was adopted, became ipso facto a citizena member of the nation created by its adoption. He was one of the persons associating together to form the nation, and was, consequently, one of its original citizens. As to this there has never been a doubt. Disputes have arisen as to whether or not certain persons or certain classes of persons were part of the people at the time, but never as to their citizenship if they were. Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that 'no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,' and that Congress shall have power 'to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.' Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization. The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words 'all children' are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as 'all persons,' and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea. The guaranty is of a republican form of government. No particular government is designated as republican, neither is the exact form to be guaranteed, in any manner especially designated. Here, as in other parts of the instrument, we are compelled to resort elsewhere to ascertain what was intended. The guaranty necessarily implies a duty on the part of the States themselves to provide such a government. All the States had governments when the Constitution was adopted. In all the people participated to some extent, through their representatives elected in the manner specially provided. [88 U.S. 162, 176] These governments the Constitution did not INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
3 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II change. They were accepted precisely as they were, and it is, therefore, to be presumed that they were such as it was the duty of the States to provide. Thus we have unmistakable evidence of what was republican in form, within the meaning of that term as employed in the Constitution. As has been seen, all the citizens of the States were not invested with the right of suffrage. In all, save perhaps New Jersey, this right was only bestowed upon men and not upon all of them. Under these circumstances it is certainly now too late to contend that a government is not republican, within the meaning of this guaranty in the Constitution, because women are not made voters. In 1855, however, the last provision was somewhat extended, and all persons theretofore born or thereafter to be born out of the limits of the jurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were, or should be at the time of their birth, citizens of the United States, were declared to be citizens also. and in 1855 it was further provided that any woman who might lawfully be naturalized under the existing laws, married, or [88 U.S. 162, 169] who should be married to a citizen of the United States, should be deemed and taken to be a citizen. "[5] ...
5. 1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)
'But no sovereignty can extend its jurisdiction beyond its own territorial limits so as to relieve those born under and subject to another jurisdiction, from their obligations or duties thereto; nor can the municipal law of one state interfere with the duties or obligations which its citizens incur while voluntarily resident in such foreign state, and without the jurisdiction of their own country. [169 U.S. 649, 691] 'It is evident from the proviso in the act of February 10, 1855, viz. 'that the rights of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers never resided in the United States,' that the lawmaking power not only had in view this limit to the efficiency of its own municipal enactments in foreign jurisdiction, but that it has conferred only a qualified citizenship upon the children of American fathers born without the jurisdiction of the United States, and has denied to them, what pertains to other American citizens, the right of transmitting citizenship to their children, unless they shall have made themselves residents of the United States, or, in the language of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution, have made themselves 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof.' 'The child born of alien parents in the United States is held to be a citizen thereof, and to be subject to duties with regard to this country which do not attach to the father. 'The same principle on which such children are held by us to be citizens of the United States, and to be subject to duties to this country, applies to the children of American fathers born without the jurisdiction of the United INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
4 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II States, and entitles the country within whose jurisdiction they are born to claim them as citizens and to subject them to duties to it. 'Such children are born to a double character: the citizenship of the father is that of the child, so far as the laws of the country of which the father is a citizen are concerned, and within the jurisdiction of that country: but the child, from the circumstances of his birth, may acquire rights and owes another fealty besides that which attaches to the father.' Opinions of the Executive Departments on Expatriation, Naturalization, and Allegiance (1873) 17, 18; U. S. Foreign Relations, 1873-74, pp. 1191, 1192.Wong Kim Ark was declared a citizen of the United States.[6]
6. 1906 (Perkins v Elg 1939) (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)
Miss Elg was born in Brooklyn, New York, on October 2, 1907. Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to 1906 and her father was naturalized here in that year. [7] (Note: Her mother derivative naturalized under Act XXII of February 10, 1855.)
8. Cable Act of September 22, 1922 repealed the Act XXII of Congress enacted February
10, 1855.[9]
5 of 11
10. John Sidney McCain III, was born on August 29, 1936 at Coco Solo Naval Air Station
in the Panama Canal Zone, to naval officer John S. McCain, Jr. (19111981) and Roberta (Wright) McCain (b. 1912). At that time, the Panama Canal was under U.S. control. The Panama Canal Zone was a territory not a State, it was not even an incorporated territory or an organized territory. John Sidney McCain III was, at best, born a US Citizen, not a natural born citizen, and as such he could, like Barack Hussein Obama II grow up to become a US Senator, but not a US President.[11]
11. 1939 Perkins v Elg, (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)
Supreme Court declares Marie Elg, native-born in New York, in 1907 to two US Citizen parents, is a natural born citizen. Fifth. But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg 'solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.' The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants [307 U.S. 325, 350] (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 , 57 S.Ct. 461, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.[4],[12]
12. 1947 Mitt Romney born in Detroit to two US Citizen parents is a natural born citizen.
[13] 13. Did the United Kingdom enact the 1948 British Nationality Act which extended consulate jurisdiction wherever a child was born to a British citizen, in territory under international treaty with the UK? YES 5.(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth: Provided that if the father of such a person is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of this section unless: that person is born or his father was born in a protectorate, protected state, mandated territory or trust territory or any place in a foreign country where by treaty, capitulation, grant, usage, sufferance, or other lawful means, His Majesty then has or had jurisdiction over British subjects; or [14]
14. Was the British Treaty of 1952 signed by President Truman in 1951? YES [15] 15. CLAIM: On June 6, 1951, in Washington DC, President Harry S. Truman signed the
1951 British Treaty (September 7, 1952, Date-In-Force), authorizing Britain consular jurisdiction over British citizens, in the USA, where consular officers could register births to British citizens, in the district of jurisdiction, and issue passports to those children. TRUE[15] INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
6 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II 16. Was Obamas father a British citizen, with a visa, in the US under the British Treaty of 1952, and represented by a British consulate? YES
17. CLAIM: Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign born student, carrying a British passport, on
a US non-immigrant student visa (8USC1101(a)(15)(F)(i)), under British consular jurisdiction, per 1951 British Treaty. TRUE 18. Did Barack Obama Sr., become a naturalized US citizen before August 4, 1961? NO
19. Were Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann Dunham, legally married under the laws of
Hawaii, on February 2, 1961? UNKNOWN
20. Was Barack Hussein Obama II born on August 4, 1961, subject to the Constitution of N E W
the United States? YES He was born a US Citizen, and is eligible to be a US Senator. [16] Although missed presidential eligibility by one generation, both of his children, Malia Ann Obama born on July 4, 1998, and Natasha (Sasha) Obama born on June 10, 2001, are both natural born citizens.
21. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove his father Barack Obama Sr., became
a naturalized US citizen before August 4, 1961. TRUE 22. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resign from office without benefits and face trial for offenses against the US Constitution.
23. Did the British Nationality Act of 1948 apply to Barack Hussein Obama II's birth?
YES[17] When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.[17]
24. Did the Kenya Independence and 1963 Kenya Constitution affect the nationality of
Barack Hussein Obama II? YES [17],[24]
25. CLAIM: It takes more than just being born an American citizen, to be a US President.
A natural born citizen is born in the US to two US nationals. Since Barack H Obama II, was born in Hawaii, ON August 4, 1961, then per (circa 1961 law) 8USC1401(a)(1), he would have been native born a US citizen; and under consular jurisdiction of the 1951 British Treaty and under jurisdiction of the British Nationality Act of 1948, Part II(5)(1) (a) he was born a British Citizen, thus a dual-citizen UK/US, and not a natural born INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
7 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II citizen, and not constitutionally eligible for the 2008/2012 Presidential elections, or to be a US President. TRUE [5],[14],[15],[16]
26. Would the British Nationality Act of 1948 or Kenya Constitution apply to him if he was
born in United States to two United States citizens? NO [20]
27. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove he was born in United States to two
United States citizens. TRUE 28. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resign from office without benefits and face trial for offenses against the US Constitution.
29. Is Barack Hussein Obama II an Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 natural born citizen? NO
[5]
30. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove he is an Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5
natural born citizen. TRUE
31. Did Barack Hussein Obama II, a Constitutional Law Professor, enter a presidential
race in 2007 or 2008 knowing or having direct knowledge of the facts of his parentage, and the constitutional requirement for a president to be a natural born citizen? YES Is this a felony against the US Constitution? YES OR IT SHOULD BE.
32. Did Barack Hussein Obama II or his campaign staff publish his computer-generated,
laser-printed, short form, certification of live birth in June 2008, during a presidential election, as a tactic of fact or propaganda, to confuse voters and attract political donations? YES [18]
33. Did Barack Hussein Obama II publish his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011?
YES [16],[19]
34. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resign
from office without benefits and he and his cohorts, Nancy Pelosi, and others, shall face trial for offenses against the US Constitution. 35. 14th Amendment 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.[20]
36. Does Barack Hussein Obama II need the 14th Amendment to prove his US
citizenship? Yes INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
8 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II 37. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.[21]
39. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II, is a de facto president, not de jure, a usurper. All
his official acts are void. He is guilty of infamous crimes against the US Constitution, that of unlawfully occupying the office of the President of the United States, felonies and high crimes. TRUE
40. CLAIM: Obama was born a dual-citizen, and the fact he was affected by the 1952
British Treaty and the British Nationality Act of 1948, proves he cannot be a natural born citizen, he is ineligible to serve as a US President, and therefore it is unlawful to solicit donations for his political campaign. Any solicitation of money on his behalf is fraud, and using the US mail adds to the charges against him. TRUE 41. RELIEF REQUESTED: The Speaker of the House of Representatives must demand that Barack Hussein Obama II immediately stand down. The Speaker must also seize the White House, secure the furnishings, including all emoluments, and then swear in the next in line of succession to the US President.
42. CLAIM: There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office,
but everybody who takes the oath to protect the US Constitution accepts the duty to protect it. Apparently the system relies on the honor of the candidate to vet themselves. This is not sufficient protection of the US Constitution against a usurper and must be changed, but until then you have accepted the duty to defend the Constitution. TRUE [22]
44. CLAIM: Everybody reading this, aiding his crimes, and not acting to protect the US
Constitution is guilty of misprision of felony. (18USC Sec. 4. Misprision of felony, 18USC Sec. 2382. Misprision of treason, UCMJ 134/95 Misprision of Serious Offense). To avoid charges of misprision, you must report knowledge of the felony or treason to any magistrate judge or military flag officer or any US State governor. TRUE [1] RELATOR: Signed: Date: .
Print Name ______________________________________________ INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
9 of 11
INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II REFERENCES: 1. 18 U.S. CODES 2382
http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi? WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrieve
2. 1776 Declaration of Independence
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
3. 1787 US Constitution
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
4. 1855 Act of Congress XXII Appendix to the Congressional Globe, for the Second Session, Thirty-Third Congress: Containing Speeches, Important State Papers, Laws, Etc. Page 378 http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30790/m1/1/ 5. 1874 Minor v Happersett
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162
6. 1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=169&invol=649
7. 1906 Perkins v Elg
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325
8. 1907 George W. Romney
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Romney
9. 1922 Cable Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Act
10. 1931 Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_P._Weicker,_Jr.
11. 1936 John Sidney McCain III
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86756.pdf
12. 1939 Perkins v Elg
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325
13. 1947 Mitt Romney
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Mitt_Romney
14. 1948 British Nationality Act INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO ICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
10 of 11
http://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1948.htm
15. 1952 US/British Treaty
http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html
16. 1961 Barack Hussein Obama II born
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate
17. The Truth About Baracks Birth Certificate
http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
18. Obamas Kenyan Citizenship?
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obamas-kenyan-citizenship/
19. Born in the U.S.A. The truth about Obama's birth certificate.
http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/
20. 14th Amendment
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am14
21. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1
22. Congressional Research Service MEMO http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-TellYour-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questions http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561#ixzz1Troq4TwQ
11 of 11