You are on page 1of 35

www.jayakaran.co.

cc  1
A NEW METHOD OF

TEACHING
ENGLISH
TO LEARNERS FROM
NON‐ENGLISH SPEAKING
COUNTRIES.
By
Israel Jayakaran, Colonel (Retd)

www.jayakaran.co.cc  2 
Israel Jayakaran is a post graduate Electronics and
Communication engineer from the Indian Army. After his
retirement, he had taken to English in order to keep himself
occupied. Has done considerable research on English grammar and
has evolved a new and novel method of teaching English to learners
from non‐English speaking homes and countries. Has written several
English grammar books in his new method to suit various levels of
learners right from school to Under graduate level.

He is a freelance writer as well and has been pursuing


writing as a hobby right from his Army service days. Has published
over 200 articles/short stories/political articles in various Indian
newspapers and magazines. His specialization is on satires and short
stories reflecting the Indian way of life and philosophy. Besides
teaching English, he also writes as of now and is currently a regular
contributor of “light pieces of human interest” to the e‐magazines,
THE CHEERS and TRIOND..

www.jayakaran.co.cc  3 
For more details and direct class please visit

www.jayakaran.co.cc

www.2tion.com

www.jayakaran.co.cc  4 
A NEW METHOD OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO
LEARNERS FROM NON‐ENGLISH SPEAKING
COUNTRIES.
By
Israel Jayakaran, Colonel (Retd)

Introduction

English learners from Non– English speaking countries require a


new method altogether; a logical and .a foolproof one at that. The
traditional grammar or the British approach of functional grammar
have not proved effective in their case at all.

Many graduates and Post graduates come to me for learning


English. They understand every word and sentence I speak with
them. And when I ask a question, they know what they want to say in
answer but do not know how to put those words in a proper English
sentence.

Their problem is obviously how an English sentence is


constructed; which word will go in which slot and so on? If they are
given a standard formula in this regard, they would have no problem

www.jayakaran.co.cc  5 
Whatever. And they are likely to bubble with a new confidence as
well.

I have evolved such a formula and simplified the complete


technique of teaching English from a low level to high level.

This article gives a glimpse of the new method of teaching English


to learners from non‐English speaking countries and homes.

Composition of a Simple sentence

The traditional grammar divides a Simple sentence into Subject


and
Predicate. This division appears rather lose and makes the reader none
the wiser. Why not teach, “ every Simple sentence can be divided
into two parts “ like this,

Tom has kicked / a poor street dog.


| |
Grammar part Meaning part

What worries a learner most of the time is the “grammar part” and
seldom the meaning part. Once he/she masters the grammar part
and how to frame it in various tenses, they will be absolutely happy in
writing out or speaking out a sentence with total ease.


The grammar part will have 3 sections like this,
Tom has kicked
| | |
Subject Auxiliary Verb

And the Meaning part will have OBJECT/ COMPLEMENT which may be
in any combination. Both O and C will contribute to the meaning
of a sentence.

Phrases like ‘objective complement’ ‘subjective


complement’ should be abandoned.
Some books talk about ‘direct object’ and ‘indirect object’. Is it
necessary that every sentence should have two objects? What if there
is only one object? Will it be ‘direct’ or ‘indirect’? What if a sentence
has 3 or 4 objects?

Summarising the above arguments, we may convey that the


components of any Simple sentence will be,
SUBJECT + AUXILIARY + VERB
|
grammar part
+ OBJECT/ COMPLEMENT
|
meaning part

This is an Universal formula and holds good for any Simple sentence
in any tense in the English language.

For each tense, the S+A+V part will be different. The O/C part is
independent of the grammar part. The O/C part of one sentence


could be attached to the grammar part of another sentence and vice
versa.

A sentence need not have the O/C part at all. But, while the
S+A+V part will give some small meaning, it is the O/C part that will
reveal the full meaning.

The formula we have discussed so far is for a Positive answer.(a1).

Categories of sentences

Traditional grammar says that there are “4 types of


sentences, viz,
Declarative/Assertive, Interrogative, Imperative and Exclamatory.“ Is
this statement foolproof? Do all these 4 types apply to every tense?
I think not. For instance, we can write out an Imperative sentence only
in the Simple present tense and in no other. What then about the
opposite of a Declarative/Assertive sentence? The above
categorization is incomplete. I would say that every Simple sentence
could be expressed in 7 different ways or in 7 categories – 5 in
Question form and 2 in Answer form as discussed here:
(1)‘General Question’ =
I + A +S+ V+ O/C (Why has Tom
I A S
kicked / this poor street dog?
V ……O/C…..

The English language uses only 9 interrogatives. They are, WHO,


WHAT,WHICH,WHOSE,WHOM (named as “Interrogative Pronouns”)


WHEN,WHERE,WHY,HOW(How many, How much, How far, How long,
How often) (named as ” Interrogative Adverbs”). A General question
will always start with one of these Interrogative words.

(2)‘Specific Question’ = A+S+V+O/C (Has Tom kicked / this poor


street dog
A S V ……..O/C………..
(3)‘Negative Question’ = Neg A +S+V+O/C (Hasn’t Tom kicked / this
poor street dog?)
A Negative question sounds quite powerful, doesn’t it?
(4) Negative answer (a2) = S+ NegA +V+O/C (Tom hasn’t kicked /
S NegA V
this spoor street dog.
O/C

(5) Positive answer (a1)= S+A+V+O/C (Tom has kicked / this poor
street dog.)

Then, there are two more powerful questions for which we


make use of the
Positive and Negative answer along with a Question tag like this:
(6)‘Emphatic Question 1’(EQ1) = S + A+ V+ O/C + Neg A + Pronoun of
the Subject ( Tom has
kicked / this poor street
dog, hasn’t he?).

(7)‘Emphatic Question 2’ (EQ2) = Tom hasn’t kicked / this poor


street dog, has he?)


We must introduce the structure of the 7 categories at the
earliest. These 7 formulae hold good for every Simple sentence
in every tense, both in Active and Passive voice, and once these are
memorized, a student will be able to compose a Simple sentence
on his/her own very confidently.

Next, given one category, a student must write out the


remaining 6. Here is an example: Given (a2) “Jane has not read her
lessons well at all .”
a1: Jane has read her lessons well.
Gen Q: How has Jane read her lessons?
SpQ: Has Jane read her lessons well?
NegQ: Hasn’t Jane read her lessons well?
EQ1: Jane has read her lessons well, hasn’t she?
EQ2: Jane hasn’t read her lessons well, has she?

Types of sentences
According to me, the English language uses only “3 types of
sentences.” They are, Simple sentence, Complex sentence and
Compound sentence. A Complex sentence will have 2 Simple
sentences with one conjunction. A Compound sentence will have 3 or
more Simples and 2 or more conjunctions. A compound sentence may
have clauses also in place of one or more Simples.
This paper has been devoted primarily to Simple sentences.
Once a learner masters the Simple sentence, he/she would have no
problem learning about the other two varieties.

10 
Parts of speech

Many books as of now state that there are 8 parts of speech


and a few say there are 9. Those who say 9, have included “Articles”
as a separate part of speech instead of treating it as Adjectives. This
argument sounds very reasonable for the simple reason, that articles
will refer to the number of a noun while adjectives will describe a
common noun in some qualitative way.

Why then are we treating Auxiliaries as part of


Verbs? Shouldn’t we treat ‘Auxiliary’ as the 10th part of speech? An
Auxiliary is a helper only to a verb. According to my study, we can
never use a Verb by itself nor an Auxiliary by itself. They must always
appear as a pair (A+V), as an inseparable pair, in any sentence and in
any Tense.

Next, Auxiliaries are meaningless words. Even the dictionary


only tells how to use these auxiliaries in a sentence and for what kind
of situations.

For all this, there are only 32 auxiliaries in the language and
they are used both for Active and Passive voices. Auxiliaries are of
two kinds: Pure auxiliaries (or Universal Auxiliaries), whose job is only
to partner/help a verb in any of its 3 forms(21) and Auxiliary cum
Verbs (11). Auxiliary cum Verbs abbreviated as A.V (A dot V) are

11 
basically auxiliaries but we can use them as Verbs in which case, it
acts as its own auxiliary simultaneously. These 11 are 2‐in‐1 words.
The A.Vs are: AM, IS, ARE, HAS, HAVE, WAS, WERE, HAD, DO, DOES
and DID (11).

Every normal Verb is a ‘word of action’. You can see some


movements or activities in verbs like, EAT,WRITE etc. All such Verbs
will compulsively need an auxiliary or auxiliary set as its helper. A
Verb is analogous to a lame man; he will need a pair of crutches or a
stick to move about. An auxiliary (auxiliary set) plays that role. That’s
how they become an inseparable pair: A + V

But, the English language seems to use some ‘action less verbs’ as
well. They are.
AM, IS,ARE,,WAS and WERE. They happen to be A.Vs. Examine the
following sentences for any activity in them:
(a) Where is my house?
(b) Are these pencils yours?
(c) Amn’t I your neighbour in this colony?
(d) Was your essay any better than mine?
(e) How were your friends in studies last year?
No action/movement whatever! So, can’t we say then that the tenses
that use these A.Vs would be the action less varieties. These 5 action
less ‘auxiliary cum verbs’ are used in only two tenses. I propose we
call them PRESENT tense (with AM,IS,ARE) and PAST tense (with WAS,
WERE). More about this a little later.

12 
Tenses

We recognize the tense of a sentence through the “Auxiliary +


Verb” or “A.V” combination and not by looking at the Verb alone.
There are 18 such A,V combinations. It is the S+A+V or S+A.V part that
will tell us the tense because the A+V of one tense is not repeated in
any other. [This stipulation however, applies only when we use the
Basic Auxiliaries, which are: AM, IS, ARE, HAS, HAVE, WAS WERE,
HAD, DO, DOES, DID, WILL, SHALL, BE and BEEN (15)].

At school level, we must cover the first 16 tenses leaving the


balance two (viz, PAST IN THE PRESENT and PAST IN THE PRESENT
CONTINUOUS) to the Plus 2 or first year in College level. Of the 16,
14 are the action‐oriented types, which are: SIMPLE PRESENT,
PRESENT CONTINUOUS, SIMPLE PAST, PAST CONTINUOUS, FUTURE,
FUTURE CONTINUOUS, PRESENT PERFECT, PRESENT PERFECT
CONTINUOUS, PAST PERFECT, PAST PERFECT CONTINUOUS, FUTURE
PERFECT, FUTURE PERFECT CONTINUOUS, FUTURE IN THE PAST (FIP)
and FUTURE IN THE PAST CONTINUOUS. (14)

Many books have bulked the PRESENT tense and SIMPLE PRESENT
and call them “Present tense”. I beg to differ. While one is an ‘action
less tense’, the other is an ‘action‐oriented tense.’ They cannot be
grouped together.

13 
In the same way, there is a clear distinction between PAST tense
and SIMPLE PAST tense.

This is how the language uses in all 16 tenses – 2 action less and
14 action based.

Some new information about a Simple sentence

Take the sentence,

“James is writing a letter to his mother.”


S A V O1 O2
“Writing” is the activity.
.
The Meaning part consists of two objects.
We can look at the O/C part in another way also. “It tells us
the details of the activity of ‘writing’. “

We have already noted that a normal Verb will reveal the nature
of the activity. Someone must be performing this activity. That
someone is the Subject. So, we can look at the Subject, not only as
one having a simple Noun but also as the “Doer” of an activity. This
activity must be directed upon something; some Noun of person or
Thing only. That something is the Object.

We must view a Complement as a Manner or Time or Place, the


Subject is being led into.

14 
How to identify O and C

We can identify O and C only through test questions using the


Interrogative Pronouns to identify the Object(s) and Interrogative
Adverbs for Complement(s). There is no other reliable method. Shall
we take a test case?

“ Sneha won’t buy cheap things


S NegA V O1
from any market any day
C1(Place) C2(time)

“Sneha won’t buy” WHAT? The answer is “cheap things”, hence it


is the Object. “Sneha won’t buy cheap things from” WHERE? Answer
is, “any market”, which is a Complement of place; Sneha……. WHEN?
The answer is “any day” which is a Complement of time.

Put the test question after S+A+V along with any other word(s)
found in the sentence, if necessary, to identify the end words.

Both O and C contribute to the meaning of the sentence or both


will contain the details of the ‘activity’ concerned.

The Complement of ‘time’ and ‘place’ will be always Nouns.


This fact is to be explained to the learners very clearly because some
students seem to think that any Noun found in the Meaning part will be
an Object. Not at all.

15 
The main word in an Object will be a Noun (of a Person or Thing)
which may be supported by words of all parts of speech except A and
V.

The main word in a Complement will be an Adverb (Adverb of


MANNER or Adverb of TIME or Adverb of PLACE) which may be
supported by words of all parts of speech except A and V.

Sentence analysis
“Analysing a sentence” means, breaking it into S,A,V,O,C
components.

The Grammar rules for all tenses

There is an S+A+V rule for every tense. Every student must


memorise these rules, which are given below:

Subject Auxiliary Verb form

1. Present tense (With A.V. Action less)


I AM AM
WE, YOU,THEY ARE ARE

HE,SHE,IT IS IS

2.Present continuous tense (with A+V)


I AM Present in
ING

16 
WE,YOU,THEY ARE “

HE,SHE,IT IS “
3. Simple present tense (with A+V)

I,WE,YOU,THEY DO Present

HE,SHE,IT DOES “

WERE WERE
I,HE,SHE,IT WAS WAS

5. Past continuous tense (With A+V)

I,HE,SHE,IT WAS Cont. verb


WE,YOU,THEY WERE “

6. Simple past tense (With A +V)

All persons DID Present

7. Future tense (With A+V)

All Persons WILL/SHALL Present

8. Future continuous tense (With A+V)

All persons WILL BE Cont. verb


SHALL BE “

9. Present perfect tense (With A+V)

HE,SHE,IT HAS PP verb


I,WE,YOU,THEY HAVE “

10. Present perfect cont. (With A+V)

17 
I,WE,YOU,THEY HAVE BEEN Cont. verb

HE,SHE,IT HAS BEEN “

11. Past perfect tense (with A+V)

All persons HAD PP form

12. Past perfect cont. (with A+V)

All persons HAD BEEN Cont. verb

13. Future perfect tense (with A+V)

All persons WILL HAVE PP verb


SHALL HAVE “

14. Future perfect cont. (with A+V)

All persons WILL HAVE BEEN Cont. verb


SHALL HAVE BEEN “

15 Future in the past (FIP) (with A+V)

All persons WOULD HAVE PP verb


COULD HAVE “
SHOULD HAVE “
MUST HAVE “
OUGH TO HAVE “
NEED HAVE “
MIGHT HAVE “
Would/could/should/must/ }
ought to/need got/become/ } use only
been USED TO } the verb in bold
.
Was/were GOING TO Present
(9 auxiliary sets)

18 
16. FIP continuous (with A+V)

All persons WOULD HAVE BEEN ING verb


COULD “ “ or Cont. verb
SHOULD “ “ “
MUST “ “ “
OUGH TO “ “ “
NEED “ “ “
MIGHT “ “ “
(all above) getting/becoming
getting/becoming only
USED TO
(all above) HAVE KEPT ING verb
(9 Auxiliary sets)

The FIP tense uses only Universal auxiliaries. We use this tense “to
talk about an action we wanted to do in some past time but didn’t do
it. ” Isn’t it strange that we have been using this tense in our
conversation (incidentally in all Indian languages as well) and yet have
not given it a suitable name! Even the British and American authors
have not. I propose that we call it by the name “Future in the Past
tense (FIP).”This is a new name from my side. Here are some
examples:
(a) We couldn’t have attended your party yesterday because there
was heavy snow on our route.
(b) We might have caught the culprit but he was too strong for us.
(c) Some of us need have got used to giving evasive answers.

19 
Some comments about use of Simple Present and Simple past tenses

I had already stated that there is no English sentence without


S+A+V. Due to wrong or improper teaching, some students and even
highly qualified English professors seem to think that there is no
Auxiliary in a1 category sentences in Simple Present and Simple past.
We need to take corrective action on this immediately. Consider the
following a1 categories with analysis:
(a) Radha and I read our morning paper at 6 a. m
S V O C(t)

Here, we have deliberately omitted (silenced) the auxiliary DO.to the


left of the verb ‘read’. The correct sentence should read, “Radha and
I do read our….”

To remind ourselves that the auxiliary DO is very much present


but hidden, we must show the sentence analysis like this,

“Radha and I read our morning……..”


S (A)V O
Then, take a Simple present with HE,SHE,IT as Subject. We have
been teaching that “with Third person singular in the Subject, add
letter ‘s’ to the verb” like this,

“He eats his breakfast hurriedly.”


S V O C

Such teaching will give an impression that there is no auxiliary. Wrong


again. Why not we teach that the real sentence is like this,
“He does eat his breakfast hurriedly.”

20 
S A V O C

Alternatively, we may silence the auxiliary and give an ‘s’ sound


to the verb. Thus,

DOES + eat = eats


DOES + catch = catches
DOES + fry = fries.
We will get the ‘s’ sound by adding letter ‘s’ to some verbs,
‘es’ to some and ‘ies’ If we write the verb with ‘s’ sound directly,
then we must show the auxiliary inside bracket like this,
“James eats his breakfast t hurriedly.”
S (A)V O C(m)

In the same way, in Simple past a1 category sentences, we must


show the auxiliary DID like this,
“Raj did speak to me the other day.
S A V O C(t)
“Raj spoke to me the other day.”
S ( A)V O C(t)

Remembering,
Spoke = DID + speak
Reached = DID + reach
Wrote = DID + write

This confusion, I am afraid, prevails all over the English speaking


world, as it were. I have often heard such statements from HOD of
English departments in the Western world on the internet. What
about the other categories. i.e, a2, Gen Sp Q, EQ1 and EQ2. Isn’t
the auxiliary/auxiliary set staring at you in these sentences? As a
matter of fact, we can never write any a2 or any question type

21 
category in an y tens without using the auxiliary the auxiliary. Could
it then vanish in a1 category?

To reiterate, there is no English sentence without S+A+V.

Other elements in the O/C part

What we have covered so far concerns only the S+A+V part and
how to write Simple sentences in all the 16 tenses.

Now, three elements could enter the O/C part and enrich our
sentences making them look sophisticated in style.

They are Infinitive, Gerund and Participle.

Infinitive
What is an infinitive? It is a Present form verb with the preposition
“to” as shown below:
Run ‐ “to run”
Finish ‐ “to finish”
Thus, the English language has as many infinitives as the number of
Present form verbs.

Having formed an infinitive, we can use it as “verb” or as “noun”.


Infinitive as verb
Since we have derived it from a Present form verb, it is also a
phrase of action. If we want to show that a Doer in a Simple sentence

22 
can do two or three actions, one after another, we should use
infinitive‐verbs only for the second and subsequent actions like this,

“Peter had come here to see me and to discuss the English


grammar rules.”

Now, the sentence formula will be,

a1 : S+A+V+O or C + Infin‐V + O/C


a1 : S+A+V+ Infin‐V + O/C
a2 : S+NegA+V+O or C+Infin‐V+ Infin‐V + O/C

The infinitive‐verb may be in the continuous form as well like this,


To go ‐ to be going
To sell ‐ to be selling
To write ‐ to be writing.

Infinitive‐verbs in Emphatics
We can use the infinitive‐verbs to make very powerful a1 or a2
categories along with A.Vs in the Subject section, as shown below:
(a) I am / not to meet you ever again.
S A.V Infin. V O C(t)
(b)John is / to report to me at 1400 hours.
(c) The students are / to sit in the class by 0800 hours.
(d) The Headmaster has / to give a proper explanation to his
superiors.

23 
(e) All teachers have / not to take any leave during this month
(f) Wasn’t Krishna / to take part in the debate yesterday?
(g) Our team had / to abandon the trek programme due to heavy rain.

While we have used the A.Vs in the three tense families, we may
use in the S+A+V part the normal verb HAVE along with some
selected auxiliaries, for the action oriented tenses in the three
families, like this,
(h) Some of us don’t have / to be present in the meeting today.
(i) Roja doesn’t have / to sit for this test.
(j) Joe did have / to speak in yesterday’s debate.
(k) You will have / to take me to a movie this evening.

Thus, we can make use of all the A.Vs to make powerful positive
or negative statements. Have you noted that all the above sentences
are ‘future looking’ types wherein no action has taken place? We can’t
use the Emphatics for any past cases. For instance, the following
statement cannot be put in the Emphatic form:
“We didn’t see this man last night”.

Infinitive Noun as Object


. As Noun, we can use an infinitive as the Object in a sentence
like this,
“The king took part in the war to win”.
“Where shall we sit to discuss?”.
“We didn’t gather here to fight, did we?”
S NegA V C O Q. tag

24 
In all the cases, the infinitive Nouns pass the object test. But,
make sure that the end word is the infinitive; only then we can treat
them as nouns. If there are any words after the infinitive, the
infinitive noun will turn into an infinitive‐verb.
Study the following example,

(a)Didn’t you attend this exam to pass?


NegA S V O1 O2

(aa)Didn’t you attend exam to pass the examination?


O1 Infin‐V O2

“to pass” has become an infinitive‐verb because of the end words ‐


“the examination”.

Infinitive Noun as Subject

“To read is a good habit.”


S A.V O
“To swim was my hobby long back”

“To tell lies as a routine is ungodly”.


Noun Ampli. words A.V C
|…….Subject…………|

If the infinitive‐noun is not self explanatory, we can use


“amplifying words” for a clearer meaning. In which case, the Subject
will be the infinitive‐noun plus the amplifying words.

We can use an infinitive‐noun as S and O in the same sentence


like this,
“To work is to worship?

25 
“To give is better than to receive”

Have you noticed that all the sentences with infinitive‐noun‐


Subject are all in Present or Past tense only, i.e action less tenses.
Why? An infinitive‐noun is neither a Person nor a Thing. Therefore it
cannot be the ‘doer’ of an action. Being an unconventional noun we
have to use them only in action less tenses.
Infinitive verb as connectors
We can use an infinitive‐verb for connecting two Simple
sentences. Isn’t this a miracle that 2 Nos S+A+V+O/C becoming 1 No.
S+A+V+O/C. Consider the following pairs:
(a) Every playing team has a Captain.
(b) A Captain leads the team in action.

We can combine these two into a single Simple sentence like this,
“Every playing team has a Captain to lead it in
action.”
(c)The thief flourished a knife at her. (d) The thief frightened the
housewife.

“The thief flourished a knife to frighten the house


wife.”

But, don’t think that every pair could be connected by an


infinitive. For instance, the infinitive‐connector method fails here:
(e)We went to the auditorium for a discussion. (f) The other party
had not turned up.

26 
Gerund

What is a ‘gerund’?

It is a Present form verb ending in ING When so done, the verb


turns into a Noun, a verbal‐noun, and it is called GERUND.
We can use a Gerund‐noun as Subject or Object. Unlike the
infinitive‐noun, here we can use amplifying words both in Subject and
Object. Examine the following sentences:

(a)Ram doesn’t like copying my notes


S NegA V Ger‐N ampl..words
|……O……………|

(b) Sleeping in the afternoon does not improve your health.


|…… S …………………| NegA V O

(c) I don’t like eating in hotels?


S NegA V Ger‐N‐O C

Do note that in(a) and (c), the gerund‐noun‐object comes


immediately after S+A+V.

We have used amplifying words to a Gerund‐noun‐object and


also Gerund‐noun‐subject.

We have used the Gerund‐N‐S in all action‐based sentences,


because a gerund is nearly equivalent to a conventional noun of
‘thing’.

27 
Gerund‐verb
Can we use a gerund with the force of a verb? Opinions differ
but I say, we can.

If we use some special prepositions to a gerund, it assumes the


force of a verb. Therefore, we should call them gerund‐verbs. Here
are some examples:
(a) Surely you could have reached my house for taking part in
various games.

“for taking” part is a verb, all because, we can replace it with an


infinitive‐verb like this,
(aa) Surely you could have reached my house to take part in
various games.
Here are more examples:
(b) My mother was very happy at meeting you yesterday.
(bb) My mother was very happy to meet you yesterday.

(c) Jennifer felt happy at winning the first prize.


(cc) Jennifer felt happy to win the first prize.

(d) Don’t all parents advise their children against fighting with
other children??
(dd) Don’t all parents advise their children not to fight with
others.

28 
Where we are unable to replace a gerund by an infinitive verb,
we should treat them as gerund‐noun‐object.
Summarising,
(a) We can use a gerund‐noun‐subject in any tense unlike the
infinitive‐noun‐subject.
(b) A gerund‐noun‐object will come immediately after S+A+V.
(c) If there is a preposition as a partner to a gerund, we may call it a
gerund‐verb if
we can replace it by an infinitive‐verb.
(d) A gerund‐verb will come like this,
S+A+V+ O or C+ gerund‐verb + O/C

Participle
What is a participle? A Participle is also a connector which can
convert two Simple sentences into a single Simple sentence.

Participles are of 3 types – Present, Past and Perfect. Using


Participles in your sentence will add beauty and style to your
language.
Present participle
A Present participle will look exactly like a gerund. We distinguish
it only by applying the ‘participle test’ and not just by looking at the
word. Consider the following sentence,
“I saw a dog playing with a child.”
S (A)V O1 ? O2

29 
“playing” here is a participle because it appears after O1(or C) . If it
is a gerund, it would have appeared immediately after S+A+V. It is not
a verb because there is no Auxiliary partner to it. This is the
‘participle test.’.
Here are more examples:
(a) We saw a small boy carrying a monkey on his shoulder.
(b) When we went to the shop we could not spot anyone
standing at the counter.
(c) John normally doesn’t lie to anyone remembering his father’s
advice.
We can also start the sentence with the Present participle but
only in some cases, like this,
(cc) Remembering his father’s advice, John normally doesn’t lie
to anyone.

We use the Present participle for ‘action not completed cases’.


Therefore the tense or the time period doesn’t matter at all.
Past participle
The Past participle is nothing but a PP verb, followed by one of
the three prepositions out of BY, AT,WITH.

We use the Past participle for ‘action completed cases’. Its


location would be, S+A+V+O or C + Past parti +O/C like in the other
case.
(a) We continued our trek charmed by the scenery around.
(b) Attracted with the light, several insects fell dead.

30 
(c) The interview board selected John impressed at his style of
English.

. Perfect participle
We use the Perfect participle to show completion of two actions
one following the other. Its location too will be the same as in the
other two cases. Here are the examples:
(a) We went out for a walk having finished our dinner, around
2000 hours.
(b) Having struck a deal, we started our work on the important
project.

Participle is a connector. Here are the examples of how to use all


the three models to connect two sentences into a single sentence:
(a)The Minister followed the CM’s instructions strictly. (b) He issued
suitable orders from his side.
The new combined sentences is,
(1) Following the CM’s instructions, the Minister issued suitable
orders from his side.
(Pr. Parti method)

(c )The dictator had come to know of the plot. (d) He refused to


eat anything on his dining table.
(2) Having come to know about the plot, the dictator refused to eat
anything on the dining table. (Perfect participle connector)

31 
(e) The MPs felt unsatisfied with the Minister’s reply. (f) They
demanded a statement right from the PM
(3) Not satisfied with the Minister’s reply, the MPs demanded a
statement right from the PM. (Past parti method)

When one of the sentences is with A.V (i.e. Present or Past tense),
use the participle BEING like this:
(g) I am your close friend. (h) Haven’t I the right to know some of
your secrets?

(d) Being your close friend, haven’t I the right to know some of
your secrets?(Pr Parti method)

Adjectives and Adverbs


There is some misconception about these two parts of speech.
Both will describe the quality of a common noun. We can use an
Adverb singly and it will pass the Adverb/Complement test. We can
use all Adverbs of Manner as Adjective by placing it to the left of a
common noun and describing it in some way except in terms of its
number.
Here is an example: (a) Banu is a beautiful girl. (b) Banu is
beautiful.
Adj Adv

In (a) ‘beautiful’ is an adjective since it is to the left of a common


noun. In(b) the word stands on its own and passes the Complement

32 
test of Manner.(TQ: HOW) An Adverb will describe a noun standing far
away from that noun.

Passive voice
As of now, the Passive voice teaching method appears to be all
right. Here, I have two proposals for consideration

If the Object has a preposition with it, we cannot put such a


sentence in Passive form. Take the following sentence:
“Mala didn’t talk to me at all this morning.” O
Because of “to” along with the object ‘me’, we cannot convert this
sentence into Passive form Try and verify it yourself.

The present day grammar books don’t even make a mention of this
fact.

Continuous tenses in Passive form


Out of the 14 action based tenses, we cannot put in Passive form
5 tenses. They are: FUTURE CONTINUOUS, PRESENT PERFECT CONT,
PAST PERFECT CONT, FUTURE PERFECT CONT and FIP. CONT. TENSES.

The reason is “shortage of auxiliaries”. But, why not we use


auxiliary sets shown below.
(1) (A) We will be winning the prize.
(P) The prize will be being won by us.
(2) (A) Raj has been copying my answers.
(P) My answers have been being copied by Raj.)

33 
(3)A) Smitha had been seeing too many movies lately.
(P) Too many movies had been being seen by Smitha lately
(4) (A) We will have reached New Delhi by tomorrow morning.
(P) New Delhi will have been being reached by us by tomorrow
(5) (A) We could have been eating our lunch for over 30 minutes.
(P) Our lunch could have been being eaten by us for over
30minutes.

Conclusion
The Author’s claim is that if we teach English through the
S+A+V+O/C formula method, the students would learn the language
much faster, find themselves on firmer grounds and also attain a kind
of mastery in the English language..

Apart from the above, the article gives some new


definitions/terminologies and new approach/interpretations. It is up
to the various fora to examine the proposals and accept with
modification if any, or reject outright. We don’t have to look to
Britain or US or Australia or Canada or New Zealand for new ideas on
English grammar. We could do it equally well and as comprehensively
too. Once a few Forums, Seminars, a team of English teachers and
Conferences accept the new ideas, they become ‘law’ and must be
adopted in various schools and college books.

34 
This is how Isaac Newton’s theory of gravitation and Galeleo’s
theory of the Earth going round the Sun, Einstein’s theory of
relativity, were accepted. and adopted..

English grammar has remained untouched and unrevised ever since


its introduction in India by Wren and Martin. Isn’t it time we
modernized/updated this so called Traditional grammar.?

For more details and direct class please visit

www.jayakaran.co.cc

www.2tion.com

35 

You might also like