RA 4136 - Anti-Carnapping Law 1.Definition of the crime - Par. 2, Sec. 2 2.Extent of the coverage - Par. 3, Sec. 2 3.Elements 4.

What is a motor vehicle according to RA 4136? 5. Nature 6. Presumption of intent to gain 7. meaning of Animus Lucrandi 8. Is ownership a material issue? 9.Moving vehicle like a tricycle within the coverage of the law? 10. Is their complex crime of carnapping with homicide, murder, physical injuries? or any other common crime? how is it proven? 11. Imposable penalty - sec.14 Cases: People - 340 SCRA 332 People - 431 SCRA 284 People - 54 Phil 452 Chua - 222 SCRA 85 333 SCRA 319 423 SCRA 237 107 PHIL 18 323 SCRA 30 329 SCRA 567

PD 533 - Cattle Rustling Act (in relation to Article.310 RPC) 1. Meaning and definition of the term "Cattle-Rustling" ; Large cattle. 2. Prima Facie evidence of cattle-rustling. 3. Is tere a need to take cattle as a while? 4. Is killing a cow without taking falls within PD.533? 5. Is there such a crime of mutiple cattle-rustling? ( PP v. Tumlos 67 P 320) 6. Who is the private complainant/offended party in cattle-rustling? 7. Is there a complex crime of cattle-rustling with homicide, Physical injuries? Important Note: PD 533 is not strictly speaking a Special Penal Law but a modification of the crime of qualified thefy/ Malicious prosecution. Take note: Penalties imposable based on RPC.

PD 6235 - Anti-Hijacking Law 1. What are the acts constituting "Hijacking" - RA 6235 2. When is an aircrafy constituting on flight? 3. What makes the act qualified? 4. Must the aircraft subject of hijacking be a public utility aircraft 5. PP v. Ang Cheo Kio - 45 Phil 475

Dangerous Drugs Act 1.Effectivity and Forerunner of DDA? 2.Salient amendments of RA 6425 3. Nature of the offense 4. Classification of Drugs 5. Elements of Possession of Drugs 6. Elements of Sale of Drugs 7. When is sale consumated? 8. Who are the offenders? 9. Qualifying and Aggravating circumstances? 10. What is a Buy Bust operation?11. What is entrapment/frame up/instigation? Cases: PP v Pendatun - 434 SCRA 148 Madarang v. CA- 147 S 123 Del Castillo v. CA- 439 S 601 Huang Zhen Hua vs. CA- 439 S 350 Angeles v. CA- 218 S 352 Dimacuha v. PP - 516 S 513 PP v. Miranda - 534 S 552 PP v. Santiago - 539 S 198

ANTI-PIRACY LAW 1) The meaning of: a.Philippine Waters b.Vessel 2) What is Piracy under PD 532, what is it's essence? 3) Distinguish Article 122 of RPC from PD 532 4) Applicability of Philippine Law if Piracy is committed outside Philippine Waters

5) When is Piracy qualified? 6) Distinguish "Piracy" from "Mutiny" Cases 1) PP vs. Lolo - 43 Phil 19 2) Calme vs. CA - 261 SCRA 285 3) PP vs. Catantan - 278 SCRA 761 4) PP vs. Tulin - 364 SCRA 10 B. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6)

Highway Robbery - What are the essential elements constituting Highway Robbery. is Locus or Situs an essential criteria to determine the crime? Distinguish between "Highway Robbers" and "Brigands" Distinguish Robbery in a highway under Article 306 of the RPC and Highway Robbery under PD 532 Gravamen of Brigandage under Art.306 of RPC Is there complex crime of Highway Robbery with Homicide, Rape, and Physical Injuries?

Cases 1) PP vs. Laurente - 255 SCRA 543 2) PP vs. Mendoza - 254 SCRA 61 3) PP vs. Panlilio -255 SCRA 503 4) PP vs. Puno - 219 SCRA 96 5) PP vs. Versoza - 294 SCRA 466 6) PP vs. Reanzares - 334 SCRA 624 7) PP vs. Argunoc - 344 SCRA 271 8) Filoteo vs. Sandiganbayan - 263 SCRA 222

ANTI GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES 1. PURPOSE OF THE LAW: enacted under the police power of the state to promote the morality in the public service. (MORFE vs. MUTUC 22 SCRA 424) POLICY to deter the public officials and employees from committing acts of dishonor and improve the tone of morality in public service. It was declared to be state policy in line with the principle that a public office is a public trust. Xx Who are public officers? Meaninig of the term receiving any gift. What are considered as corrupt practices of the public officers? SEC 3, RA 3019 When is there causing any undue injury to any party including the government of private property? SEC 3(e) Can Private individuals be held liable under RA 3019? Prescription of offense? SEC. 11 Court having jurisdiction to hear the case? RA (wala ni nakasulat sa post) Reconcile the provision, Suspension is mandatory but not automatic. Nature of the offense criminal or civil? Primafacie evidence unexplained wealth Can a sitting senator be suspended by Sandiganbayan? Cases: 1) MORFE vs. MUTUC - 22 SCRA 424 2) MEJORADA vs. SANDIGANBAYAN - 151 SCRA 399 3) LUCIANO vs. ESTRELLA 34 SCRA 769 4) LUCIANO vs. PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR 28 SCRA 517 5) PP vs. ALBANO 163 SCRA 511 6) DELOSO vs. SANDIGANBAYAN 173 SCRA 409 PD 1612- Fencing 1. Elements of Fencing 2. Definition/meaning of FENCING and FENCER 3. Essence of the violation 4. Is it a continuing crime? 5. Venue? 6. Primafacie Evidence of FENCING? 7. How will the fence be prosecuted? PD 1612? or RPC? 8. Distinguish FENCING from ROBBERY 9. Stolen property subject of the charge indipensable to prove fencing? 10. Proof of purchase necessary when goods are in possession of the offender? Cases: Dizon - 234 SCRA 63 PP - 227 SCRA 65 CAPILI - 338 SCRA 45 Francisco - 434 SCRA 122