Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
Your Texas Disciplinary rules of Professional conduct and Texas
rules of Disciplinary procedure clearly states that a lawyer has an
obligation to represent the legal interest of their client. More
specifically Point 1, under "Comment: scope of Representation "states
that the "…Client has ultimate authority to determine the objectives
to be served by legal representation within the limits imposed bylaw,
the lawyers professional obligations and the agreed scope of
representation".
To the contrary the Federal court Judge not only refused to hold a
hearing to determine if there was indeed "cause" (reasons beyond my
control) for my neglected legal concerns absense in the state habeas
corpus brief Mr Sullivan filed in my name, but he also procedurally
barred these claims.
For the record, when I attempted to notify the district court Judge,
Juanita Vasquez Gardner (399th) in writing, of Mr Sullivans
dereliction of duty, they also ignored me, and I know the court
received the certified mailing because the package was signed for by
an agent of the court.
PAGES 123-141
http://www.scribd.com/doc/1085439/PAGES-123-TO-141
My Federal attorney John Carroll and I are asking the 5th Circuit
court where my appeal is pending, to grant us a COA (which gives
me permission to appeal what the Federal court procedurally barred)
in hopes that they will recognize Scott Sullivan tied my hands and
silenced me, denying me my due-process rights.
Please accept this as a righteous grievance.
Sincerely
Reginald Blanton
Enclosure
J. SCOTT SULLIVAN
7800 IH 10 WEST
SUITE 519
SAN ANTONIO
TEXAS 78230
Bar NO. 19483350