Philosophes were too objective -- they chose to see human nature as something uniIorm. The Romantics attacked the Enlightenment because it blocked the play oI the emotions and creativity. The philosophe had turned man into a soulless, thinking machine -- a robot. In the midst oI what has been called The Romantic era, nature was accepted as a general standard.
Philosophes were too objective -- they chose to see human nature as something uniIorm. The Romantics attacked the Enlightenment because it blocked the play oI the emotions and creativity. The philosophe had turned man into a soulless, thinking machine -- a robot. In the midst oI what has been called The Romantic era, nature was accepted as a general standard.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Philosophes were too objective -- they chose to see human nature as something uniIorm. The Romantics attacked the Enlightenment because it blocked the play oI the emotions and creativity. The philosophe had turned man into a soulless, thinking machine -- a robot. In the midst oI what has been called The Romantic era, nature was accepted as a general standard.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
MA1OR CONFLICTS AND OPPOSITIONS IN ENGLISH ROMANTICISM.
ROMANTIC THEORIES OF THE POETIC IMAGINATION
ROMANTICISM appeared in conIlict with the Enlightenment. You could go as Iar as to say that Romanticism reIlected a crisis in Enlightenment thought itselI, a crisis which shook the comIortable 18th century philosophe out oI his intellectual single-mindedness. The Romantics were conscious oI their unique destiny. In Iact, it was selI-consciousness which appears as one oI the keys elements oI Romanticism itselI. The philosophes were too objective -- they chose to see human nature as something uniIorm. The philosophes had also attacked the Church because it blocked human reason. The Romantics attacked the Enlightenment because it blocked the Iree play oI the emotions and creativity. The philosophe had turned man into a soulless, thinking machine -- a robot. Imagination, sensitivity, Ieelings, spontaneity and Ireedom were stiIled -- choked to death. Man must liberate himselI Irom these intellectual chains. The Romantic era can be considered as indicative oI an age oI crisis. The era was proliIic in innovative ideas and new art Iorms. In the midst oI what has been called the Romantic Era, an era oIten portrayed as devoted to irrationality and "unreason," the most purely rational social science -- classical political economy -- carried on the Enlightenment tradition. We have seen that one way to deIine the Romantics is to distinguish them Irom the philosophes. But, Ior both the philosophes and the Romantics, Nature was accepted as a general standard. Nature was natural -- and this supplied standards Ior beauty and Ior morality. The heart was a source oI knowledge -- the location oI ideas "Ielt" as sensations rather than thoughts. Intuition was equated with that which men Ieel strongly. Men could learn by experiment or by logical processbut men could learn more in intuitive Ilashes and Ieelings, by learning to trust their instincts. One power possessed by the Romantic, a power distinct and superior to reason, was imagination. The Romantics opted Ior a liIe oI the heart. Their relativism made them appreciative oI diversity in man and in nature. There are no universal laws. There are certainly no laws which would explain man. Truth and beauty were human attributes. A truth and beauty which emanated Irom the poet`s soul and the artist`s heart. II the poets are, as Shelley wrote in 1821, the "unacknowledged legislator`s oI the world," it was world oI Iantasy, intuition, instinct and emotion. It was a human world. Coleridge and Wordsworth, however, understood romanticism in two entirely diIIerent ways: while Coleridge sought to make the supernatural "real" (much like sci-Ii movies use special eIIects to make unlikely plots believable), Wordsworth sought to stir the imagination oI readers through his down-to-earth characters taken Irom real liIe (in "The Idiot Boy", Ior example), or the beauty oI the Lake District that largely inspired his production (as in "Lines Composed a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey").Wordsworth calls his poems "experiments," and he presents them as models oI a new kind oI poetry. He also demands that poetic diction be modelled on primitive, passionate and natural utterance, that which is most spontaneous, the product oI emotion. Wordsworth thinks that the problem oI poetic diction is one oI urban artiIiciality, which produces the hackneyed verbal conventions oI late Neoclassicism. The preservation oI the previous poetic tradition was Ior Wordsworth a mere instance oI social vanity; poetical cliches, personiIication oI abstract entities, etc., are to disappear Irom the new poetry. It may be noted that Wordsworth always speaks oI a selection oI the language oI the lower classes: this is contradictory with the spirit oI the new conception he is bringing Iorward. Wordsworth explicitly links imagination only to "gratiIication," and not to values. But a moral view oI imagination is implicit in his poems and in his discussion. The poet does not teach any deIinite concepts, but he conveys immediate intuitions oI nature, which are even more valuable. "The poet thinks, and Ieels, in the language oI human passions. Poetry had been deIined by Wordsworth in 1800 in this way : "poetry is the spontaneous overIlow oI powerIul Ieelings ; it takes its origin Iorm emotion recollected in tranquillity".Both Wordsworth and Coleridge conceive oI poetic experience as an active response oI the mind to personal perception and experience (more active, though, in Coleridge's account than in Wordsworth's). Through Ieeling, Wordsworth argues, we sense a unity in nature and a sense in experience, which had been dissolved by reason and the analytic Iaculty oI the human mind. Poetry, which has been the work oI Ieeling, must be judged by Ieeling alone. Wordsworth Iorgets his proposal oI an objective Ioundation oI taste and asks the reader to judge his poems according to his personal reaction, and not according to the prejudice oI others. Wordsworth was to deal with themes oI common liIe whose imaginative heightening would lead to an intuition oI the presence oI the unknown; Coleridge would develop Iantastic themes (The Ancient Mariner ) imaginatively inIusing them with the known so as to produce credibility. In any case, Coleridge says, the work oI the poet must join accurate observation with the modiIying power oI imagination, mixing the old and the new in such a way that the Ireshness oI sensations is always present in the poem. It has been argued that, Ior all their elaboration, Wordsworth and Coleridge's theories oI the imagination are narrow and restricted, in that they are made ad hoc, to suit the special kind oI poetry they were writing. The subject oI romantic poems is usually inspiration, creation, the poet's own sensibility, etc. They are highly reIlexive, and so is Coleridge's theory oI the imagination. He wants poetry to be based on genius and originality, and to deal with its subject matter in such a way that its language will be organically linked to it; or rather, that the subject- matter is co-extensive with the poem: "to the truly great poets . . . there is a reason assignable not only Ior every word, but Ior the position oI every word." Coleridge is the major English exponent oI organicism as a metaphor Ior the work oI art; he opposes organic Iorm and mechanic Iorm in the same way as the German romantics (Herder, Schlegel). Imagination produces organic Iorms, Iancy merely mechanic Iorms. The eIIect oI a good poem, Coleridge says, is to make us see liIe anew, to remove "the Iilm oI Iamiliarity" which sets at length on all our thoughts and perceptions. This Ireshess oI perception can never be achieved with a poetic diction which is old-Iashioned, well- known; cliches and hackneyed expressions rather have the opposite eIIect, they dull our perception. However, as it happened with Wordsworth, Coleridge lays the stress not so much on novelty as on quality oI expression; badness comes not so much Irom repetition as Irom intrinsic Iaults. But Coleridge's attitude to poetic language is not the same asWordsworth's. He will criticise Wordsworth's primitivistic assumptions as well as the implications which derived Irom them with respect to poetic language. Coleridge does not share Wordsworth's Iaith in the intrinsic virtues oI the cottagers and country liIe. He believes in the value oI culture and education, rather than in "untutored minds" in contact with nature. He points out that Wordsworth's deIinition oI "the language oI real liIe" was equivocal: on one hand, he identiIied it with the language oI the lower classes; on the other, that language was to be a "selection." In Iact, he says, iI you "select" Irom a particularity (language oI peasants) what you obtain is a generality (language oI men): "I adopt with Iull Iaith the principle oI Aristotle that poetry as poetry is essentially ideal, that it avoids and excludes all accident, that its apparent individualities oI rank, character, or occupation must be representative oI a class" (Biographia 192). Language, Ior Coleridge, does not spring immediately Irom nature in the way Wordsworth would have it: it is the product oI a whole society, and it has a long history, in which the role oI the learned is Iundamental. Imagination and emotion, the principal characteristics oI the poem, are in truth the characteristics oI the poet. The "Second generation" oI Romantic poets includes Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley and John Keats. Byron, however, was still inIluenced by 18th-century satirists and was, perhaps the least 'romantic' oI the three. His amours with a number oI prominent but married ladies was also a way to voice his dissent on the hypocrisy oI a high society that was only apparently religious but in Iact largely libertine, the same that had derided him Ior being physically impaired. In retrospect, we now look back to Jane Austen, who wrote novels about the liIe oI the landed gentry, seen Irom a woman's point oI view, and wryly Iocused on practical social issues, especially marriage and choosing the right partner in liIe, with love being above all else. Austen's !7ide and !7efudice would set the model Ior all Romance Novels to Iollow. Jane Austen created the ultimate hero and heroine in Darcy and Elizabeth, who must overcome their own stubborn pride and the prejudices they have toward each other, in order to come to a middle ground, where they Iinally realize their love Ior one another. Austen's other most notable works include; Sense and Sensibility, Mansfield !a7, !e7suasion and Emma. In her novels, Austen brings to light the hardships women Iaced, who usually did not inherit money, could not work and where their only chance in liIe depended on the man they married. She brought to light not only the diIIiculties women Iaced in her day, but also what was expected oI men and oI the careers they had to Iollow. This she does with wit and humour and with endings where all characters, good or bad, receive exactly what they deserve. Poet, painter and printmaker William Blake is usually included among the English Romanticists, though his visionary work is much diIIerent Irom that oI the others discussed in this section. In America, with the essays and poetry oI Ralph Waldo Emerson began an explosion oI American English literature, which included the publication oI Herman Melville's Moby Dic and the poetry oI Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson.