Rep. Darrell chainnan requests infonnation related to the systems and reporting practices of NASA. NASA has strategically modernized its integrated financial management system. NASA's independent audit of the FY 2010 financial statements has found no material weaknesses or misstatements.
Rep. Darrell chainnan requests infonnation related to the systems and reporting practices of NASA. NASA has strategically modernized its integrated financial management system. NASA's independent audit of the FY 2010 financial statements has found no material weaknesses or misstatements.
Rep. Darrell chainnan requests infonnation related to the systems and reporting practices of NASA. NASA has strategically modernized its integrated financial management system. NASA's independent audit of the FY 2010 financial statements has found no material weaknesses or misstatements.
Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 OLIAl2011- 00370:KHS:eel The Honorable Darrell E. Issa Chainnan Committee on Oversight and Government Refonn U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chainnan: April 7, 2011 This is in response to your letter of March 8, 2011, to Elizabeth Robinson, the NASA Chief Financial Officer, signed jointly by Representatives Platts, Jordan and Lankford, requesting infonnation related to the systems and reporting practices of NASA. Enclosed is a spreadsheet that contains NASA's responses to each of your questions. During the past decade, NASA has strategically modernized its integrated financial management system in order to provide a re-engineered financial management system infrastructure using industry "best practices" that deploys enabling technology to provide management'infonnation on a real time basis. NASA has also integrated the core financial system with procurement, human capital, travel, and asset management, for improved reporting and analysis. The core financial system accounting platform include the Standard General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, Purchasing, Cost Management, Facilities Maintenance and Asset Accounting; and the NASA Enterprise Applications Competency Center (NEACC) provides centralized operations. NASA's core financial system supports its budget fonnulation, execution, and funds control, consistent with the requirements ofOMB Circular A-II, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the budget. In addition, NASA consistently provides timely and reliable budget and other financial reports for management throughout the agency, using infonnation generated from its financial system, on which Agency executives and operating managers rely for decision making. NASA's core financial system is supported by ancillary feeder systems with common data elements that adhere to government-wide standards for reporting. A comprehensive set of internal controls are in place to maintain integrity and reliability of the infonnation generated by the system. NASA's independent audit of the FY 2010 financial statements has found no material weaknesses or misstatements. NASA's internal control compliance framework, the Comprehensive Compliance Strategy (CCS), serves as the basis for ensuring effective agency-wide financial management, financial reporting, and financial control. It encompasses guiding principles for executing effective financial management functions and activities with internal control and compliance solutions inherently embedded in the process. Monitoring and oversight of the effectiveness of the CCS is conducted through the Continuous Monitoring Program (CMP) as well as through ongoing Evaluation Monitoring and Testing (EMT) periodic compliance reviews. The EMT reviews provide another level of management assurance regarding compliance with CCS, while at the same time serving as a review program used to periodically measure the effectiveness of CMP and validate the operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. 2 In FY 2010, NASA's comprehensive set of internal controls safeguarded its assets from loss, misappropriation, or destruction. Internal control activities are monitored monthly for operating effectiveness, and any identified deficiencies are corrected in a timely manner and existing controls are strengthened as necessary. As a result, there are no known instances of asset loss, misappropriation, or destruction attributable to the financial system. NASA's integrated financial management system is in substantial compliance with Federal Financial Management Information Act (FFMIA) requirements. Sincerely, ~ ~ L. Seth Statler Associate Administrator for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Enclosure cc: The Honorable Elijah Cummings Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Bureau NASA NASA NASA NASA NASA NASA System Name SAP-Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Suite Treasury Automated Clearinghouse . (ACH) Health and Human Services (HHS)lPayment Management System (PMS) Web Based Time Attendance and Distribution System I (WebTads) Agency Labor Distribution System rATn,,) m ::::I n 0- VI c ...... (J) Question 1 Identify and briefly describe each of your bureau's business and accounting systems. (For the purpose of this data call, "business and accounting systems" is interpreted to mean "financial management systems," as defined in OMB Circular A-I27.) NASA has implemented the following modules: Funds Management (FM); Financial Accounting (FI); Sales & Distribution; Investment Management; Materials Management, Controlling (Cost); Project Systems; and Real Estate. Pay info of vendor/travel payments Interface to retrieve confirmation files from GOALS Administers Letter of Credit (LOC) Time and Attendance system Labor distribution system Question 2 Question 3 For each system identified in response to Question 1: Explain how the business State whether information At what and accounting systems found in that system is intervals identified in response to regularly or periodically do these Question 1 interact with one submitted to any of the submission another. Government-wide stoFMS accounting systems occur? maintained by FMS (e.g., GFRS, FACTS I, FACTS II, IFCS, IRAS, etc.). Explain how these submissions to FMS systems occur (describe both manual and automated processes). As transactions are recorded Yes. Trial Balance (T/B) Monthly/ in different modules, info from FI consolidated quarterly/ accounting records are and submitted to DOT and annually updated in FM & FI modules gov't-wide accounting of SAP systems. Manual submission include IFCS, GFRS, PAR and TROR. Automated submission includes IPAC, SF 224, FACTS I & IT and, IRAS References non-agency No N/A systems N/A No N/A References non-agency No N/A systems Data recorded in ALDS No N/A Data recorded in SAP ERP No N/A FMlFI modules Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 For each system identified in For each system identified in response to Question 1, In addition to your bureau's submissions response to Question 1: describe recent, current, and planned migration or to FMS's Government-wide accounting modernization projects. systems .and to OMB's MAX system (as rlp, .. rih"rl i. your rponono"o to Ouestions State whether At what Recent Current Planned Is any of If so, how is In what information found intervals do this same this format is this in that system is these informatio information information regularly or submissions n published published periodically to MAX published online? online? submitted to occur? online for OMB'sMAX public system. viewing? Explain how these submissions to MAX occur (describe both manual and automated processes). Yes. TIB info from Quarterly/ The SAP Enterprise The SAP ERP is The SAP ERP is Yes Agency's PAR PDF SAP-FI is annually Resource Planning in a "steady in a "steady and budget info consolidated & (ERP) isina state" of state" of is found on reported periodically "steady state" of operation. operation. agency's operation. website. The Federal Financial Management Systems Strategy may be found on page 252. . No N/A None None None No N/A N/A . No N/A None None None No N/A N/A No N/A None None None No N/A N/A No N/A None None None No N/A N/A No N/A None None None No N/A N/A Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 For each system identified in response to In addition to your bureau's For each system identified in respouse to Qu For each system identified in response to Questio Question 7, describe recent, current, and submissions to Government-wide planned migration or modernization projects. grants management and reporting !sv.<tems (as ries"riherl in 'OlIr Bureau System Name Identify and briefly describe each For each system State whether information At what State whether At what intervals do Recent Current Planned Is any of If so, how is In what system that your bureau uses to identified in response found in that system is intervals information found in that these submissions this same this format is manage grants, direct loans, to Question 7, regularly or periodically do these system is regularly or occur? informatio information this and/or loan guarantees. explain how that submitted to the Catalogue of submission periodically submitted to n published published informatio system interacts with Federal Domestic Assistance sto CFDA any of the Government- online for online? n your bureau's (CFDA). occur? wide grants management public published business or and reporting systems viewing? online? accounting systems Explain how these submissions (e.g., Federal Assistance identified in response to CFDA occur (describe both Awards Data System to Question 1. manual and automated (FAADS), FAADS PLUS, processes). etc.). Explain how these submissions occur (describe both manual and automated processes). - NASA PRISM Develops solicitations and Interfaces with PRISM is not used to submit data N/A PRISM not used to submit NASA's reporting of During Currently in the No firm scheduled N/A N/A N/A ward/grant documents for Federal Agency Financial to CFDA. CFDA is not a system. data to FAADS PLUS. its grants data to FPDS FY2010 process of plan for the next Procurement Data System-Next System SAP. It's an OFFM controlled process NASA is the only agency NG is consistent with NASA evaluating and PRISM version Generation (FPDS-NG) reporting. Commitment info via a that maintains a catalog of values that submits it grants data guidance in FAR 4.6, upgraded implementing upgrade, but a full All NASA procurement offices use purchase requisition is which are assigned to each grant to FPDS-NG. Submission Contract Reporting to Ver6.2 PRISM capability procurement PRISM interfaced from SAP making federal agency for use is is accomplished through an and NFS 1804.6, from 6.5 to derive and process version to PRISM. Obligation award and award reporting. interface from PRISM with Contract Reporting for interface the TAS upgrade of PRISM info via an CFDA Program Coordinator at some data elements such as award data reporting to.FPDS-NG will be release by award/grant is NASA-HQ responsible for Treasury Account Symbol software vendor in interfaced from maintaining NASA's CFDAs on (TAS) manually entered FY 2012-2013 PRISM to SAP CFDA.gov. Also responsible for directly in FPDS-NG. timeframe pending communicating changes required to each of NASA's systems that contain CFDA NASA Enhanced Internal reporting and workflow Financial data related EPDW is an internal reporting and N/A EPDW is an internal N/A None Currently None N/A N/A N/A Procurement Data system that combines data from to grants and awards workflow tool with no external reporting and workflow upgrading System (EPDW) SAP, PRISM and FPDS-NG for is extracted from interfaces tool with no external EPDWAto management of grants and award NASA financial interface incorporate actions and resources. All NASA systems SAP to several procurement offices use EPDW as populate data elements enhancements internal reporting and workflow too in EPDW which will collectively result in more accurate and timely extract data from PRISM NASA Electronic Posting Data entry system used by NASA N/A EPS send CFDA to Grants.gov N/A EPS is used to submit pre- . Both submission to None None Plans to modernize N/A N/A N/A System (EPS) buyers to interface with FBO and and post-award grant Grants.gov and FBO interface to FBO Grants.gov and post pre- and post- notices to Grants.gov. If are via automated by transitioning to award announcements to the public. award could also result in a email using pseudo- web services in FY All NASA procurement offices use contract, the pre-award XML 11 pending funding EPS notice is also submitted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) N Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 For each system identified in response to Question For each system identified in response to Question In addition to your bureau's submissions to Government-wide contract I 13, describe recent, current, and planned migration management and reporting systems (as described in your responses to or modernization projects. Question 15): i State whether information For each system found in that system is identified in response regularly or periodically submitted to any ofthe Is any of to Question 13, Government-wide contract this same In what Identify and briefly explain how that management and reporting At what intervals do informatio format is Bureau System Name describe each system that system interacts with systems (e.g., FPDS, FPDS- these submissions Recent Current Planned n published If so, how is this information published online? this your bureau uses to your bureau's NG, FAPllS, etc.). occur? online for informatio manage contracts. business or public n published accounting systems Explain how these viewing? online? identified in response submissions occur (describe to Question 1. both manual and automated processes). NASA PRISM Develops solicitations and Interfaces with Agency Submission of NASA data to NASA's reporting of DuringFY Currently in the No firm scheduled Yes NASA Procurement Data View (NPDV) is an on-line, ? ward/grant documents for Financial System SAP. FPDS-NG is accomplished its contracts data to 2010 NASA process of plan for the next web-based query with access to NASA's summary- FPDS-NG reporting. All Commitment info via a through an interface from FPDS-NG is consistent upgraded evaluating and PRISM version level procurement data. Includes a geographic (map) NASA procurement offices purchase requisition is PRISM with some data with guidance in FAR PRISM from implementing upgrade, but a full and ad-hoc query capabilities. Enables users to view use PRISM. All NASA interfaced from SAP to elements such as TAS 4.6, Contract Ver6.2 to PRISM capability procurement process actions at the Congressional District Level. NPDV procurement offices use PRISM. Obligation manually entered directly in Reporting and NFS 6.5. to derive and version upgrade of was modified for recovery-specific reporting. Link to PRISM info via an award/grant FPDS-NG 1804.6, Contract interface the TAS PRISM will be NPDV: is interfaced from Reporting for award to FPDS-NG release by software http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/cgipbinlnpdv/npdv.cig. In PRISM to SAP data reporting vendor in FY 2012- addition to submitting pre- and post-awards notices to 2013 timeframe FBO, EPS simultaneously posts these notices and pending supporting documentation to the NASA Business Opportunities Portal for public access NASA Enhanced Internal reporting and Financial data related EPDW is an internal reporting N/A None Currently None Yes NASA Procurement Data View (NPDV) is an on-line, ? Procurement Data workflow system that to grants and awards is and workflow tool with no upgrading to web-based query with access to NASA's summary- System (EPDW) combines data from SAP, extracted from NASA external interfaces EPDWto level procurement data. Includes a geographic (map) PRISM and FPDS-NG for financial systems SAP incorporate a more and ad-hoc query capabilities. Enables users to view management of grants and to populate data efficient method to actions at the Congressional District LeveL NPDV award actions and resources. elements in EPDW technically extract was modified for recovery-specific reporting. Link to All NASA procurement data from PRISM NPDV: offices use EPDW as http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/cgipbinlnpdv/npdv.cig. In internal reporting and addition to submitting pre- and post-awards notices to workflow tooL All NASA FBO, EPS simultaneously posts these notices and procurement office use supporting documentation to the NASA Business EPDW as their internal Opportunities Portal for public access reporting and workflow tool NASA Electronic Posting Data entry system used by N/A EPS is used to submit pre- Submission to FBO is None None Plans to modernize Yes NASA Procurement Data View (NPDV) is an on-line, ? System (EPS) NASA buyers to interface and post-award notices to via automated emall the interface to FBO web-based query with access to NASA's summary- with FBO and Grants.gov FBO using pseudo-XML by transitioning to level procurement data. Includes a geographic (map) and post pre- and post- web services in FY and ad-hoc query capabilities. Enables users to view award announcements to the 11 pending funding actions at the Congressional District LeveL NPDV public. All NASA was modified for recovery-specific reporting. Link to procurement offices use NPDV: EPS. AllNASA http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/cgipbinlnpdv/npdv.cig. In procurement office use EPS addition to submitting pre- and post-awards notices to FBO, EPS simultaneously posts these notices and supporting documentation to the NASA Business Opportunities Portal for public access w Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Briefly describe your bureau's efforts to comply with OM:B's If your bureau Describe the data quality controls and State whether all of your State whether your bureau Identify the individual(s) who memorandum on the Open Government Directive--Federal interacts directly with procedures that your bureau has bureau's current grants, incurs any reporting serve(s) as Senior Accountable Spending Transparency, dated April 6, 2010. USASpending.gov, in implemented for information that is contracts, and loans are burdens or costs as a result Official(s) ("SAO") over federal addition to submitting submitted to USASpending.gov, accurately reflected on of its obligations under the spending data quality for your information to the including information submitted USASpending.gov. If Federal Financial Assistance agency, as defmed by OM:B. systems that feed directly and information submitted to not, estimate the Transparency Act (FFATA) USASpending.gov, one of the systems that feeds percentage of current that it does not incur as a describe the nature, USAPending.gov grants, contracts, and result of other reporting frequency, and loans that are not obligations. purposes of that accurately reflected, interaction with using both the number USASpending.gov. of transactions and dollar figures. NASA issued two instructions to the field, Procurement Information NASA submits the In accordance with instruction at NFS Yes. NASA's Thanks to the elimination of The Honorable Dr. Elizabeth Circular (PIC) 10-13, on September 23,2010 for contracts; and Grant F AADSPLUS data file 1804-604, NASA Procurement Offices submissions to DSVT F AADS, the addition of a TAS Robinson Information Circular (GIC) 11-01, on January 24, 2011 for assistance directly to the maintain a Data Quality Plan approved by always meet the error field in FPDS-NG, and awards. The instructions provided guidance on implementing the USASpending.gov Data the Agency. In tum, the Agency has an threshold. When metrics USASpending's ability to pull Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (PL Submission and overall Data Quality Plan as part of were posted to Contracts data directly from 109-282) as amended by section 62(a) ofPL 110-252. The Validation Tool implementation of the Open Government USASpending.gov, FPDS-NG, the burdens for instructions covered new requirements to report subcontract awards (DSVT). NASA Directive. Semi-annual data verification NASA always had a high reporting were significantly and executive compensation. The instructions required the inclusion of submits data on the 5 th and validation is performed in accordance rate of accuracy and has lessened. The burden that FAR clause 52.204-10 in solicitations and contracts, and of a new and 20 th of each month. with guidance from OMB. In addition, never failed to submit data remains is the F AADSPLUS General Provision in grant awards as specified. NASA's writing The purpose of this the NASA HQ Office of Procurement each month. file that must be submitted system PRISM was updated with both the clause and provision. The submission is to fulfill performs monthly data quality 'spot directly to USASpending.gov. two instructions also outlined verification responsibilities and the use the requirements of checks' by utilizing the ad hoc capability of the Federal Subcontract Reporting System (FSRS). For contracts FFATA. in FPDS-NG. In addition, a Data Quality that include the clause 52.204-10, prime contractors are responsible for Plan which also covers Assistance awards reporting their subcontract information, for any first-tier subcontracts stored in FPDS-NG is being prepared of $25,000 or more, by the end of the month following the month of (note: the Assistance data is not award, at FSRS, in accordance with the following phase-in schedule: 1 currently pulled into USASpending.gov). until September 30,2010, any newly awarded subcontracts if the prime It will be modeled after Center Data contract is $20m or more; 2) from October 1, 2010, to February 28, Quality Plans and include consideration 2011, any newly awarded subcontract if the prime contract is $550,000 of Best Practices. It wiII be in place or more; and 3) beginning March 1,2011, any newly awarded before the end ofFYIl. The subcontract must be reported if the prime contract equals or exceeds F AADSPLUS required fields that must $25,000. The OMB guidance included specific gross income tests for be derived are further reviewed for both the prime and subcontract to determine if they were exempt from accuracy after each submission. These reporting. For assistance awards, the guidance was applicable for all fields along with any error messages NASA grants and cooperative agreements awarded on or after October received from DSVT are submitted for - NASA is the only federal agency that puts Assistance data into FPDS-NG. We believe that this should be the model for the federal government to use. FAADSPLUS fields would then be mapped to what FPDS NG can accommodate so that USASpending.gov could pull
- Also, in order for NASA to take full advantage of federal- wide systems' improvements, costs will be required to modernize and enhance Agency systems.
DARRELL E. ISSA, CALIFORNIA CHAIRMAN DAN BURTON, INDIANA JOHN l. MICA, FLORIDA TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, PI:NNSYlVANIA MICHAEL R, TURNt:FI, OHIO PATRICK McHENRY, NORTH CAROLINA JIM JOROAN, OHIO JASON CHAFFETZ, UTAH CONNIE MACK. FLORIDA TIM WALBERG, MICHIGAN JAMES LANKFORD, OKLAHOMA JUSTlN AMASH, MICHIGAN ANN MARIE BUERKLE, NEW YORK PAUL A. GOSAI1, 0.0.5 .. ARIZONA RAUL R, LABRAOOR, IDAHO PATRICK MEEHAN. PENNSYLVANIA scarT DEsJARLAIS, M.D., TENNESSEE JOE WALSH. ILLINOIS TREY GOWDY, SOUTH CAROLINA DENNIS A. ROSS, FLORIDA FRANK C. GUINTA. NEW HAMPSHIRE BLAKE FARENTHOLD, TEXAS MIKE KELLY, PENNSYLVANIA LAWRENCE J. BRADY STAfF DIRECTOR ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS (lCOltgrei% of tbe Wnittb of ll\epre%entattbcii COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM 2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515-6143 MiwOAITV (202) 225-{)074 (202) 225-3974 MINQRITY (202) 225-5051 hUptllovsrsighl.house.gov March 8,2011 Ms. Elizabeth Robinson Chief Financial Officer NASA Headquarters 300 E Street, SW Room 8L11 Washington, DC 20546 Dear Ms. Robinson: ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS. MARYLAND RANKING MINORITY MEMBER EDDLPHUS TOWNS, NEW YORK CAROLYN e, MALONEY, NEW YORK ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, DISTRICT OF COLUM BIA DENNIS J. KUCJNICH, OHIO JOHN F, TIERNEY, MASSACHUSETTS WM. LACY CLAY, MISSOURI STEPHEN F. LYNCH, MASSACHUSETTS JIM COOPER, TENNESSEE GERALD E. CONNOLLY, VIRGINIA MIKE QUIGLEY, ILLINOIS DANNY K. DAVIS, ILLlNOlS BRUCE l. BRALEY, IOWA PETER WELCH, VERMONT JOHN A. YARMLrrH. KENTUCKY CHRISTOPHER S, MURPHY, JACKIE SPEIER, CALIFORNIA The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is conducting oversight of' federal agencies' financial management. We are writing to request information relating to the electronic systems in use at your agency to support business and accounting functions; grants and loans managelnent; contracts management; and reporting to government-wide systems such as USASpending.gov and Recovery.gov. The Committee on Oversight and Govermnent Reform ("Committee") is the principal oversight committee in the House of Representatives and has broad oversight jurisdiction as set forth in House Rule X. To enable the Committee to perform oversight of the federal government's attempts to modernize its financial management systems, please provide the following records, and explanations to the Committee staff no later than the close of business on March 22, 2011: 1. Identify and briefly describe each of your agency's business and accounting systems. If separate divisions, bureaus, or offices of your agency use separate systems, identify which divisions, bureaus, or offices use each system. 2. Explain how the business and accounting systems identified in response to Request No.1 interact with one another. 3. For each system identified in response to Request No.1, state whether information found in that system is regularly or periodically submitted to any of the government-wide accounting systems maintained by the DepartInent of the Treasury, e.g., GFRS, FACTS I, FACTS II, IFCS, etc" and explain how and at what intervals those submissions occur, including descriptions of both lTIanual and automated processes. 4. For each system identified in response to Request No. l ~ state whether information foood in that .systeln is regularly or periodically submitted to the Office of Management and Budget's ("OMB") MAX Information System, and explain how and at what intervals those submissions occur, including descriptions of both automated and manual processes. 5. For each system identified in response to Request No.1, describe recent, current, and planned migration or modernization proj ects. 6. In addition to your agency's submissions to government-wide accounting systelTIS maintained by the Department of the Treasury and OMB, as described in response to Requests Nos. 3 and 4, does your agency publish any of the same information online for public viewing? If so, describe how and in what format that information is published. 7. Identify and briefly describe each system that your agency uses to manage grants, direct loans, andlor loan guarantees. If separate divisions, bUreaus, or offices of your agency use separate systems, identify which divisions, bureaus, or offices use each system. 8. For each system identified in response to Request No.7, explain how it interacts with any business or accounting system identified in response to Request No.1. 9. For each systelTI identified in response to Request No.7, state whether information found in that system is regularly or periodically submitted to the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA), and describe how and at what intervals those submissions occur, including descriptions of both automated and manual processes. 10. For each system identified in response to Request No. '7, state whether information found in that system is regularly or periodically submitted to any of the government-wide grants management and reporting systems, e.g., FAADS, FAADS PLUS, etc., and describe how and at what intervals those submissions occur, including descriptions of both automated and manual processes. 11. For each system identified in response to Request No.7, describe recent, current, and planned migration or modernization projects. 12. In addition to your agency's submissions to govermnent-wide grants managelnent and reporting s y s t e m s ~ described in response to Requests Nos. 9 and 10, does your agency publish any of the same information online for public viewing? If so, describe how and in what fonnat that information is published. 13. Identify and briefly describe each system that your agency uses to Inanage contracts. If separate divisions, bureaus> or offices of your agency use separate systems, identify which divisions, bureaus, or offices use each system. 14. For each system identified in response to Request No. 13, explain how it interacts with any business or accounting system identified in response to Request No.1. 15. For each system identified in response to Request No. 13, state whether information found in that system is regularly or periodically submitted to any of the government-wide contract management and reporting systems, e.g., FPDS, FPDS-NG, FAPIIS} etc., and describe how and at what intervals those submissions occur, including descriptions of both automated and manual processes. 16. For each system identified in response to Request No. 13, describe recent, current, and planned migration or modernization proj ects. 17. In addition to your agency's submissions to government-wide contract Inanagement and reporting systems, described in response to Request No. 15, does your agency publish any of the same information online for public viewing? If so, describe how and in what format that information is published. 18. Briefly describe your agency's efforts to comply with OMB's memorandUll1 on the Open Govenunent Directive - Federal Spending Transparency, dated April 6, 2010. In particulru" describe whether and how your agency has begun to collect and repott sub-award data, as required by the memorandum; and describe how your agency's reports on OMB's data quality metrics, as required by the n1emorandum, are generated, 19. If your agency interacts directly with USASpending.gov, in addition to SUbmitting information to the systems that feed USASpending.gov, describe the natUle, frequency, and purposes of that interaction. 20. Describe the data quality controls and procedures that your agency has implemented for information that is subnlitted to USASpending.gov, including information submitted directly and information submitted to one of the systems that feeds DSASpending.gov. 21. State whether all of your agency's current grants, contracts, and loans are accurately reflected on USASpending.gov, and, if not, estimate the percentage of current grants, contracts, and loans that are not accurately reflected, using both the number of transactions and dollar figures. 22. State whether your agency incurs any reporting burdens or costs as' a result of its obligations under the Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act ("FFAT A") that it does not incur as a result of other reporting obligations, and estitnate those burdens and costs in worker-hours and dollars. 23. Identify the individual(s) who serve(s) as Senior Accountable Official(s) ("SAO") over federal spending data quality for your a g e n c y ~ as defined by OMB. Please note that for purposes of responding to this request, the terms "records," '4communications," and "referring or relating" should be interpreted consistently with the attached Definitions ofTenns. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Tabetha Mueller or Hudson Hollister with the Committee staff at (202) 225-5074. ~ I . - ~ ~ ' - - - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ - arrell Issa Chainnan Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 111 ubcommittee on Regulatory Affairs, Stimulus Oversight and Government Spending Sincerely, Todd R. Platts Chainnan Subcommittee on Government Organization, Efficiency and Financial Management an Subcommittee on Tec1mology, Infonnation Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and Procurement Refonn cc: Honorable Elijah Cummings, Ranking Member Committee On Oversight And Government Reform Attachment Definition of Terms 1. The tenn "record" Ineans any written, recorded, or graphic Inatter of any nature whatsoever, regardless of how recorded, and whether original or copy, including, but not limited to, the following: Inelnoranda, reports, expense reports, books, Inanuals, instructions, financial reports, working papers, records notes, letters, notices, continnations, telegrams, receipts, appraisals, p81nphlets, l11agazines, newspapers, prospectuses, interoffice and intra office electronic mail (e-lnail), contracts, cables, notations of any type of conversation, telephone call, Ineeting or other cOlll111unication, bulletins, printed matter, cOlllputer printouts, teletypes, invoices) transcripts) diaries, analyses, retunls, sUlnlnaries, Ininutes, accounts, estitnates, projections, comparisons, Inessages, correspondence, press releases, circulars, financial statelnellts, reviews, opinions, offers, studies and investigations, questionnaires and surveys, and work sheets (and all drafts, preliminary versions, alterations, modifications, revisions, changes, and all1endments of any of the foregoing, as well as any attacrul1ents or appendices thereto), and graphic or oral records or representations of any kind (including without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, Inicrofiche, microfilm., videotape, recordings and motion pictures), and electronic, mechanical, and electric records or representations of any kind (including, without 1ilnitation, tapes, cassettes, disks, and recordings) and other written, printed, typed, or other graphic or recorded matter of any kind or nature, however produced or reproduced, and whether preserved in writing, film, tape, disk, videotape or otherwise. A record bearing any notation not a part of the original text is to be considered a separate record. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate record within the meaning of this term. 2. The tenn "COlnmUllication" means each Inalmer or lneans of disclosure or exchange of infonnation, regardless of Ineans utilized, whether oral, electronic, by docU1nent or otherwise, and whether face-to-face, in a lneeting, by telephone, mail, telexes, discussions, releases, personal delivery, or otherwise. 3. The terms "referring or relating,1I with respect to any given subject, Ineans anything that constitutes, contains, embodies, reflects, identifies, states, refers to, deals with or is in any lnanner whatsoever pertinent to that subject.