TO BE: The Birthright of the Imagination --Poetics is both intelligent design and information technology.

Ive found the landscape of prose wearisome when I read large examples of it. I prefer the brevity of poetry as a perpetual flow suddenly alerted to itself by means of a poem. Every brain has its own personality. Therefore, the imaginative birthright persists albeit stalled and oppressed by authorities of temporary duration. All the perceptual fields have a technological role in what we take as the meaning we read in letters. (Letters too are a technology as is evident in programming languages all too well) Memory is perception and emotion owing to its own organ and character. Poetry is a human heritage. It is the transcendent purpose of any society to rename itself in grander terms and by these terms reorient itself continuously. As to these ends, the dawn is a plain example. But every moment dawns anew, such that light is the origin that originates infinitely as per its prerogatives to lead to constant creation. The imagination can give birth to faith as a part of its construction and its activity. Thus poetrys investment in sound is an example of the way that rhyme (as well as other aspects of sound mimicked in verse) betray a perhaps deeper or recessive source: the open constant is what Ive called it, which refers to a certain corporative realization of thought as a heritage of something antecedent, beginning in a source of its own conception.

It is the core or heart whatever is the agreement has been that it has a name even when its an unknown due to its mysterious preeminence in human motives (love or hatred) and its infallibility. That it is unknown speaks of a consideration long concealed to poetry sounds is an aggravating of its character to be realize through the appeal to its ineluctable nature. Thus for poetry, sound is a rotor consisting of phonics and phonetics (but many other and unknown effects as well) The imagination has a birthright all of the techniques of poetics confirm and compel. The rotor of sound is contained as an inner and outer spherical motion perhaps a wheel. These two wheels as it were, are brought into coterminous operation upon the anvil of the ear. So that it may appear to be the case that the ear itself is but an imitation of the world and all of its invocations installed within it. Therefore, it is true that a person may never not have sound. As it was true as Helen Keller came to know that vision takes place as an inversion of the physical world absorbed into the eye and reordered vertically to consist of sight.