Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2l3
-L
PATRICK
&id- fZ&
qpgvma66.
J. TOOMKY
I'8NNSYLVAhNA
Stiitttl
The Honorable Jon Wellin, ghoff
Chairiiian Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
tstts
gkttatt
Dc ~o0
WASHINGTON,
NHINWNO
0
(p
-g-
~I
.
'h,
l3%
o0
-.
'
=j
$
Re:
C I Hub
I am writing to urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to issue i'ts final decision on the MARC I Pipeline project in the Northern Tier a f Pennsylvania. The MARC I project will serve as a long-tenn investment in vital energy infrastructure. It also holds enormous promise for Pennsylvania as an irnrnediate generator of new jobs and economic growth.
The estimated economic benefits of this project are extraordinary. Two-thirds of the MARC I pipeline's nearly $300 million investnicnt will stay in Pennsylvania providing a sorely needed economic boost. The pipeline construction alone will itnmediately create 600 new, highpaying jobs. Pennsylvania consumers will also benefit long-term as the pipeline will optimize competitive domestic natural gas supplies. It will bolster existing infrastructure serving the eastern interconnect and enhance America's energy independence and, security by helping to ensure a safe aTId reliable supply of dameatiC natural gaS.
As I understand, FERC StaE issued a 300page Environmental Assessment (EA) in May finding that the MARC I project, with appropriate mitigating measures, does not significantly aQ'ect the quality af fhe human environment. We understand that, in the preparation of the EA, PERC worked diligently in an open, transparent process involving many stakeholdera ta ensure that the project will be undertaken within the strongest environmental and ecolagical considerationa.
However, since FERC Stadt issued this recortimended approval, third parties have attempted to thwart FERC's authority and impair the economics af this critical energy infiastructure project. These parties are not impacted by the pipeline project itself; rather, they appear ta be using a FERC proceeding in an effort to advocate and affect national energy policies and. tangential issues associated with shale gas.
This is particularly concerning as we have learned that the construction schedule is precariously &agile and could easily force the construction of the pipeline to be delayed, by a year or longer due ta special accommodations for environmental concerns, including those associated with spawning fish and migrating birds. Delaying the final decision will most
20110912-0010 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/08/2011 20 1-Sep-07 02 58 PM Senator Pat Toorney 2022280284
3/3
PATIIICK
aa aeaYLYAML
J.TOOMEY
'Saltant
certainly delay the snticipstd benefits the investment, jobs, snd infrastructure.
Items Smst~
when pennsylvania
WASHINGTON, OC 2D810
direly needs
response and would greatly appreciate you keeping our staff informed as you take your next steps.
U. S. Senator
20110912-0010 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/08/2011 20"I-eep-0i 02 58 PM Senator Pat Teoney 2022280284
1/3
PATFSCK
J. TOOMEY
eeeelrleee
SAMSNG, HOUSING, ANU ORGAN AFFASIS COMMERCE, SCIENCE, ANO
FRNRRVLVARIA
TRANSPORTATION
SUMET
JOINT MXRIOIRC COMMITTEE
Feeler Eneqp
FAX NUNRRR
RegulREOT/
Commission
9/7/2011
202-208-210G
FHONSNUNRRD
FRNDRR'8
NUMSSI:
YOURRXYRRRNCR NUNRRR
iVRRC
I Hah
Line Psolect
LI URGEFIT
CI POR REVIEVF
0 PLEASE COMMENT
X PLEASE REPLY
CI PLEASE RXCYCLE
In
C. n I"
I
I "U
!n
~
CO
;"1
Ir 1 rI ' I
CU
n c.
erI