Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Secretariat of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation (SeCyT) is the body that deals in all
matters related to the layout and implementation of the national scientific and technological policy, the
coordination of the activities that are carried out in this area, the assessment and control of the
administration and the promotion and publication of these activities.
The scientific and technological area comprises institutions, human resources, scientific equipment and
devices, through which the scientific and technological knowledge is generated and flows. The activities
carried out can be classified as: scientific and technological research and development, human resources
training in science and technology, broadcast of science and technology, technological innovation, services
and transference of science and technology, among the main ones. The measurement of these activities and
of the necessary resources to carry them out generates information that should be properly organized and
coordinated. This is the task that this Secretariat deals with in order to present a useful instrument when
making decisions that concern the design of science and technology policies for Argentina.
The systemic organization of the National Statistical Information started back in 1968. In that year Law Nº
17622, regulated by Decree 3110/70 that created the National Statistical System (SEN), was sanctioned,
depending on the National Institute of Statistic and Censuses (INDEC), originating several subsystems
(Provincial, Municipal Statistical Systems, etc.).
Twenty years later, the National Statistical System on Science and Technology (SENCYT) was created as
part of SEN. SENCYT is a set of rules, principles, methods and activities, methodologically related to each
other that make it possible to monitor the structure of the National Technological Scientific Area and its
dynamics by means of the measurement (periodic or permanent, whichever the case may be) of the
resources and activities in science, technology and technological innovation, as well as of other aspects
linked to them (See diagram Nº 1).
7
SENCYT began to work with continuity in September 1993 with Decree Nº 1831. This Decree fixed the
minimum obligations assigned to SeCyT, as regards compilation and production of statistical information.
SeCyT is thus responsible for the processing of information about national public and private expenditures in
science and technology, the scientific and technical human resources of the country as well as all subsidies
and public loans granted for the realization of the scientific and technological activities within the national
territory, in order to obtain indicators that make it possible to evaluate the present and future of the Argentine
scientific and technological activities.
In the year 2001, as from the promulgation of the Frame Law Nº 25467 of Science, Technology and
Innovation (20/9/2001), the Secretariat receives the beneficent effects of its general legal frame that
structures, impels and promotes the activities related to conforming and maintaining upgraded the systems
of information and statistics of the National System of Science, Technology and Innovation, pointing out, the
compulsiveness of the organizations and public institutions that carry out scientific and technological
activities to provide SeCyT, in due time, with the information it requests, as long as it that does not affect the
agreements of confidentiality that may exist. On the other hand, the mentioned Law establishes the need to
obtain the appropriate indicators for the evaluation of the whole System.
8
DIAGRAM Nº 1. - National Statistical System on Science and Technology
CNEA
Ministry of
National Agency for
S&T Promotion
INA Federal
Planning,
Secretariat of Science, Public
Technology and INPRES Investment and
Productive Innovation Services
OTHERS
INSTITUTIONS
INIDEP
Business enterprises
9
MAIN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS RELATED TO SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
• APN: National Parks Service
• Others:
- INAPL: National Institute of Anthropology and Latin American Thought
CABINET HEADQUARTERS
• INAP: National Office of Public Administration
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
• CITEFA: Institute of Scientific and Technological Research for Defence
• IGM: Military Geographic Institute
• INMAE: National Institute of Air and Space Medicine
• SHN: Navy Hydrographic Office
• SMN: National Meteorological Service
• SNID: Navy Research and Development Service
10
• INTI: National Institute for Industrial Technology
• Others:
- INPI: National Institute for Industrial Property
- ANP: National Patent Office
- INV: National Institute of Vitiviniculture
- INDEC: National Institute of Statistics and Censuses
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
• ANLIS: “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán” National Administration of Health Laboratories and Institutes
• Others:
- CENARESO: National Center for Social Reeducation
- CIN: Center for Neurobiological Research
- CNCV: Vector Control National Coordination
- “Prof. Dr. J.P. Garraham” Paediatric Hospital
- INAME: National Institute for Medicine
- ANMAT: National Administration for Medicine, Food and Medical Technology
11
PROVINCES AND BUENOS AIRES CITY GOVERNMENTS
• ACC: Cordoba Science Agency
• CIC: Province of Buenos Aires Scientific Research Commission
• CFI: Federal Investment Council
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
• RICYT: Science and Technology Indicators Network – Latin American and Inter American
• ISI: Institute for Scientific Information
• OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
• UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
12
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
The operation named SURVEY OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT CARRY OUT SCIENTIFIC AND
TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES takes place annually since 1994, fulfilling Decree Nº 1831/93.
The surveys performed throughout these years include information from the organizations devoted to
science and technology activities from different environments: state organizations, public and private
universities, non-profit organizations and companies. The answers were requested at the maximum
institutional level; this way, for example, the National Council on Scientific and Technical Research
(CONICET) is responsible for all its performing units; the National Institute for Agricultural Technology (INTA)
is responsible for all their experimental stations; the companies, on the other hand, are responsible for their
establishments and headquarters settled within the national territory. All organizations participating in the
survey are guaranteed the confidential treatment of the individual information dealt with.
The coverage of the survey reached the complete universe of the public organisms and that of the public and
private universities. In the case of the non-profit organizations, a representative sample of the total
population was consulted. For the companies an estimate was carried out, in this opportunity, based on the
upgrading of the values corresponding to the year 2005, using as index the variation in the Gross Domestic
Investment in Machinery and Equipment, supplemented with the results from the National Survey to
Companies on Innovation, Research and Development and Technologies of the Information and of the
Communications that SeCyT carried out together with INDEC in the year 2005.
A questionnaire was sent to all the organizations requesting people appointed as coordinators to complete it
and then send it by mail, fax or electronic mail. From the answers received we proceeded, first, to an
analysis of consistency and coherence of the information in the individual forms; later on, this pre-processed
information was included in the general data base.
It is important to point out that in the fourteen years analyzed, the same survey methodology was applied
with similar instruments to gather information. As a consequence the results obtained throughout this period
are basically comparable.
13
In the particular case of the calculation of the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) people working in science
and technology activities, special coefficients were used depending on the organization with which to convert
the number of taken full- or part-time positions in a number of FTE people. This is shown in the following
chart:
Institution
Private non-
Occupation Government Public Private Business
profit
body university university enterprise
institutions
FT Researchers 1 1 0.77 0.77 1 1
PT Researchers 2 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
FT Fellowship holders 1 1 0.77 0.77 1 1
PT Fellowship holders 2 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Technicians 1 1 1 1 1
Support staff 1 1 1 1 1
1 FT: Full-time
2 PT: Part-time
Note: For example, to calculate the number of FTE Researchers in universities the following mathematical
expression is used: No. Researcher (FTE) = No. FT Researcher x 0.77 + No. PT Researcher x 0.25
The criteria for the application of the mentioned coefficients appear in the recommendations for data
processing in human resources of S&T dealt with in the Frascati Manual. In this manual, the use of
coefficients is recommended for the effective dedication to research up to a 0.90 for the FT positions. This
approach, developed on the basis of studies on the labor activities of researchers, establishes that 100% of
the activity of the FT researcher is distributed up to 90% in tasks of pure or effective research and from a
10% to tasks related to S&T corresponding to teaching, training, dissemination, technology transference, etc.
In our example of university researchers we took the figure 0.77 as coefficient after performing studies
14
referring to time dedication for the research in FT positions. This figure represents the average time
dedication of the FTE researcher, with FT position, in an Argentine university.
In the case of some researchers, research fellowship holders, technicians and support staff that belong to
more than one institution, the position is assigned to only one of the institutions in order to avoid duplications.
In the present publication the monetary values are expressed in millions of current pesos. For its
comparison, it is important to point out that the rate of the American dollar (yearly average) during 2002 was
considered of 3.21 pesos, for 2003 of 2.95 pesos, for 2004 of 2.94 pesos, for 2005 of 2.92 pesos and for
2006 of 3.08 pesos.
The statistical information included in the present publication can be found in the Web page of this
Secretariat in Internet under the heading of S&T Indicators.
http://www.secyt.gov.ar
15
CHAPTER I
___________________________________________
GROSS DOMESTIC EXPENDITURE ON R&D
16
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D, 2002-2006
3 000
2 500
2 000
1 500
1 000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
GERD Annual
GERD/GDP
Year (millions current variation
(%)
pesos) (%)
17
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by performing sector, 2002-2006
Million current pesos
3 500
3 000
2 500
2 000
1 500
1 000
500
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
18
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by type of costs, 2006
Percentage share in national total
Other current
expenditures
5%
Goods and
services
15%
Labour costs
69%
19
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by source of funds, 2006
Percentage share in national total
Private Non-Profit
2%
Funds from abroad
Private Higher
1%
Education
Provincial 1%
government
3%
Central government
41%
Public Higher
Education
23%
Business
enterprises
29%
20
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and type of R&D, 2006
Millions current pesos
1 000
800
600
400
200
0
Government Business Public Higher Private non- Private Higher
enterprises Education profit Education
21
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by field of science, 2006
Percentage share in national total
Others
Humanities 2%
6%
Engineering and
Social sciences technology
7% 38%
Medical sciences
14%
Natural sciences
16%
Agricultural sciences
17%
22
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by socio-economic objective, 2006
Millions current
SOCIO-ECONOMIC OBJECTIVE
pesos %
23
CHAPTER II
___________________________________________
R&D PERSONNEL
24
R&D Personnel, 2002-2006
Full-time equivalent
50 000
45 000
40 000
35 000
30 000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
25
R&D Personnel by occupation, 2002-2006
Percentage share in national total (based on full-time equivalent)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Researchers Fellowship Technicians Support
Holders Staff
2002 2006
26
R&D Personnel by sector of employment, 2006
Percentage share in national total (based on full-time equivalent)
Business enterprises
16%
Government
47%
27
R&D Personnel by sector of employment and occupation, 2006
Percentage share in national total (based on headcount)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Government Public Higher Private Higher Business Private non-profit
Education Education enterprises
28
Researchers by field of science, 31 December 2006
Percentage share in national total (based on headcount)
Humanities
Natural sciences
9%
27%
Social sciences
19%
Engineering and
Agricultural technology
sciences 18%
13% Medical sciences
14%
29
Fellowship holders by field of science, 31 December 2006
Percentage share in national total (based on headcount)
Humanities
7% Natural sciences
Social sciences 36%
18%
Agricultural
sciences
9%
Engineering and
Medical sciences
technology
11%
19%
30
Researchers and fellowship holders by socio-economic objective, 31 December 2006
Based on headcount
31
CHAPTER III
___________________________________________
RESEARCHERS BY GENDER AND AGE CLASS
32
Full-time researchers and fellowship holders by age class, 2002-2006
Based on headcount
33
Age pyramid of full-time researchers and fellowship holders
by gender and age class, 31 December 2006
Headcount
5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000
Male Female
34
Full-time researchers by gender and sector of employment, 31 December 2006
Male Female
Researchers
SECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT Headcount Headcount % Headcount %
35
CHAPTER IV
___________________________________________
RESEARCHERS AND FELLOWSHIP HOLDERS
BY LEVEL OF UNIVERSITY GRADUATION
36
Full- and part-time positions by level of graduation and gender, 31 December 2006
Researchers
Fellowship holders
* University teachers, non-university tertiary level degrees and others degrees not included above.
37
Full- and part-time positions of researchers and fellowship holders
by level of graduation and sector of employment, 31 December 2006
Percentage share in national total (based on headcount)
Government
Bachelor
Public Higher
Education Master
Private non-prof
100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100
* University teachers, non-university tertiary level degrees and others degrees not included elsewhere.
38
CHAPTER V
___________________________________________
R&D PROJECTS
39
Number of projects by field of science, 2002-2006
(*) Refer to all projects developed by national and provincial institutions, public and private Higher Education, business enterprises
and private non-profit institutions. Total number at the end of reference year (31 December).
40
Number of R&D projects by socio-economic objective, 2002-2006
1- Exploration and exploitation of the Earth 579 535 605 682 712
2- Infrastructure and general planning of land use 263 315 427 451 558
3- Control and care of the environment 721 776 977 1 091 1 100
4- Protection and improvement of human health 2 289 2 580 3 159 3 519 3 587
5- Production, distribution and rational utilisation of energy 286 323 282 372 370
(*) Refer to all projects developed by national and provincial institutions, public and private Higher Education, business
enterprises and private non-profit institutions. Total number at the end of reference year (31 December).
41
Projects by type of R&D, 31 December 2006
Percentage share in national total
Experimental
development Basic research
20% 29%
Applied research
51%
42
CHAPTER VI
___________________________________________
OUTPUT OF SCIENTIFIC AND
TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES
43
Applications for Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) by type of rights, 2002-2006
(2001=100)
220
Industrial designs
180
140
Patents
60
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS
Utility Industrial Varieties
Patents Trademarks
models designs of plants
2002 4 861 295 855 42 846 n.a.
2003 4 557 329 1 112 81 171 n.a.
2004 4 602 352 1 198 76 485 n.a.
2005 5 269 368 1 553 78 353 n.a.
2006 5 617 257 1 586 79 226 n.a.
Sources: National Institute for Industrial Property (INPI) and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
44
Domestic IPRs applications by type of rights, 2002 and 2006
Percentage share of resident applicants in national total
100
75
50
25
0
Patents Utility models Industrial designs Trademarks
2002 2006
Sources: National Institute for Industrial Property (INPI) and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
46
Applications for patents and utility models by field of study, 2005
Percentage share in total national applications
Agricultural
Social sciences
sciences
Medical 2%
3%
sciences
15% Engineering and
technology
42%
Natural sciences
38%
47
IPRs granted in Argentina by type of rights, 2002-2006
(2001=100)
600
Utility models
500
Varieties of plants
400
300
200 Patents
Trademarks
Sources: National Institute for Industrial Property (INPI), Direction of Registration of Varieties of the Secretariat of Agriculture,
Livestock, Fishing and Food (SAGPyA) of the Ministry of Economy and Production and World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO).
48
Domestic ownership of IPRs granted in Argentina by type of rights, 2002 and 2006
Percentage share of residents in national total
100
75
50
25
0
Patents Utility models Industrial Trademarks Varieties of
designs plants
2002 2006
Sources: National Institute for Industrial Property (INPI), Direction of Registration of Varieties of the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock,
Fishing and Food (SAGPyA) of the Ministry of Economy and Production, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
49
Patenting in Argentina, 2002-2006
Others indicators based on patent applications, according to OECD methodology
50
Publications and articles in S&T journals, 2002-2006
S&T books
51
Production of Argentina according to Science Citation Index (SCI)
by type of publication, 2002-2006
Source: Argentine Center of Scientific and Technological Information (CAICYT) from ISI Web of Science data.
52
SCI records for Argentina by field of study, 2002-2006
Physics, chemistry and earth sciences 2 057 1 983 2 048 1 956 2 199
Life sciences 1 978 1 928 2 055 1 591 2 103
Agriculture, biology and environment 1 366 1 363 1 425 1 189 1 753
Clinical medicine 1 395 1 567 1 335 1 058 1 284
Engineering, computing and technology 474 533 450 349 578
Social and behavioural sciences 147 141 168 151 192
Multidisciplinary sciences 32 37 39 33 46
Instruments 42 43 51 7 50
Arts and humanities 1 2 6 5 6
Not specified 87 57 71 128 0
Note: Articles assigned to several fields are counted as one full article to each field.
Source: Argentine Center of Scientific and Technological Information (CAICYT) from ISI Web of Science data.
53
CHAPTER VII
___________________________________________
INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIONS
54
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D in selected countries, 2006 or last year available
As a percentage of GDP
55
Researchers in selected countries, 2006 or last year available
Per thousand labour force
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
* For Argentina labour force data are based on Current Households Survey (EPH).
Sources: SECYT, OECD and RICYT.
56
Researchers, GERD and GERD per researcher in selected countries, 2006 or last year available
By descending order of researchers
United States 2002 1 334 628 276 260 276 260 206 994 206 994
Japan 2004 677 206 145 728 118 026 215 190 174 284
Germany 2005 268 100 71 013 61 712 264 875 230 183
France 2004 200 064 45 696 40 363 228 407 201 750
Canada 2002 112 624 14 255 18 452 126 572 163 837
Spain 2005 109 753 13 328 13 208 121 436 120 343
Brazil 2004 84 979 5 329 13 775 62 710 162 099
Australia 2004 81 704 11 200 11 590 137 080 141 854
Italy 2004 71 012 18 608 17 920 258 401 248 847
Argentina 2006 35 040 1 051 2 737 29 994 78 105
Mexico 2004 34 485 2 853 4 205 82 732 121 937
Chile 2003 7 085 507 1 117 71 616 157 657
57
Comparative data on number of IPRs granted and percentage granted to residents
in selected countries, 2006 or last year available
58
Number of S&T articles published in selected countries, 1990-2003
Source: RICYT.
59
CHAPTER VIII
___________________________________________
OTHER GENERAL INDICATORS
60
Total population by rural and urban areas and
total labour force by gender, National Population Census 1960-2001
Thousand persons
Source: Demography analysis of the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC),
61
Exports and imports of Argentina, 2002-2006
Millions USD
50 000
45 000
40 000
35 000
30 000
25 000
20 000
15 000
10 000
5 000
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Exports Imports
62
Exports and imports of Argentina by main products, 2006
Percentage share in national total
Exports Imports
63
Exports from Argentina by product, 2002-2006
(Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature of MERCOSUR)
Millions USD
COMMON NOMENCLATURE
EXPORTS
OF MERCOSUR
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
TOTAL 25 453.5 29 138.3 34 135.7 39 722.6 45 902.2
Live animals 1 591.6 1 929.8 2 514.8 3 028.5 3 630.6
Vegetable products 4 213.2 5 160.0 5 493.4 6 449.7 6 296.7
Oils and fats 2 083.8 2 831.5 3 155.6 3 290.7 3 888.3
Food 3 900.1 4 805.4 5 442.7 5 948.0 7 029.7
Mineral products 4 973.3 5 633.1 6 581.6 7 636.8 8 735.3
Chemicals 1 463.5 1 675.2 2 146.9 2 453.8 2 801.7
Plastics and rubber 807.0 855.9 1 128.0 1 403.3 1 528.0
Hides and skins 759.2 793.6 939.4 949.4 1 036.2
Wood and charcoal 141.2 197.0 277.1 278.5 318.5
Paper 332.9 388.9 483.6 494.9 581.1
Textile materials 383.2 377.5 462.8 486.6 492.0
Footwear, umbrellas and others 13.2 18.7 21.4 30.4 34.0
Non-metallic mineral manufactures 94.2 102.0 124.5 144.4 166.1
Manufactures of metals 1 593.8 1 545.6 1 706.7 2 318.7 2 475.6
Machinery and electrical materials 937.5 861.0 1 057.8 1 324.1 1 560.2
Transport equipment 1 712.2 1 631.6 2 102.5 2 987.8 4 382.0
Photographic and optical instruments 86.7 83.3 127.5 168.0 184.7
Others1 366.9 350.2 369.4 329.0 761.5
1. Exclude special transactions.
Source: National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC).
64
Imports to Argentina by product, 2002-2006
(Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature of MERCOSUR)
Millions USD
2006
High-tech
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2004
2003
2002
2001
2006
Low-tech
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
-20000 -10000 0 10000 20000
Import Export
66
Manufacturing trade by industry and technological intensity, 2002-2006
(International Standard Industrial Classification ISIC Rev.3)
Millions USD
High-technology manufacturing
Medium-high-technology manufacturing
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Manufacturing sectors
Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports
Total 3 846.2 3 784.0 6 077.1 3 851.0 9 928.5 5 146.2 12 721.1 6 607.1 15 440.0 8 157.3
Electrical machinery 372.0 162.2 519.8 146.5 832.0 189.2 1 084.9 241.1 1 454.4 279.3
Motor vehicles 704.4 1 574.3 1 481.4 1 419.5 3 001.0 2 037.1 4 088.0 2 862.6 5 069.1 3 994.5
Chemicals excl. pharm. 1 925.8 1 557.4 2 645.9 1 809.2 3 604.0 2 342.9 4 204.7 2 764.5 4 742.6 3 006.0
Other transport equipment 28.9 15.4 39.0 11.5 91.6 15.8 203.4 23.3 328.0 31.0
Non-electrical machinery 815.1 474.7 1 391.0 464.3 2 399.9 561.2 3 139.9 715.6 3 845.9 846.5
67
Medium-low-technology manufacturing
Petroleum refineries & products 440.7 4 220.9 485.3 4 931.7 930.2 5 678.0 1 430.3 6 284.0 1 631.8 6 936.9
Rubber and plastic products 406.8 320.1 675.7 340.8 882.2 444.1 1 087.3 594.6 1 295.0 715.0
Non-metallic mineral products 91.4 103.5 146.7 117.2 213.9 140.1 262.5 166.3 342.0 194.5
Shipbuilding 32.3 25.1 71.0 23.3 36.1 13.0 112.5 30.9 42.6 79.2
Ferrous metals 488.6 1 508.9 669.2 1 493.7 1 204.7 1 599.2 1 671.4 2 236.2 1 968.9 2 396.6
Fabricated metal products 106.1 60.5 150.3 40.1 268.5 61.4 319.3 65.3 384.0 65.4
Low-technology manufacturing
68
ANNEX
The following definitions are based on the methodology of the Frascati Manual of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Secretariat of Science, Technology and
Productive Innovation (SeCyT).
Organization: for the present survey, it means the highest institutional level of each organization carrying
out S&T activities. It includes: public and private universities; national and provincial public institutions;
business enterprises and private non-profit institutions
Research and Experimental Development (R&D): it comprises creative work undertaken on a systematic
basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the
use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications. The term R&D covers three activities: basic
research, applied research and experimental development.
Basic research: it is experimental or theoretical work undertaken primarily to acquire new knowledge abouth
the underlying foundation of phenomena and observable facts, without any particular application or use in
view.
Applied research: is also original investigation undertaken in order to acquire new knowledge. It is,
however, directed primarily towards a specific practical aim or objective.
69
Experimental development: it is systematic work, drawing on existing knowledge gained from research
and/or practical experience, and directed to producing new materials, products or devices, to installing new
processes, systems and services, or improving substantially those already produced or installed.
Research (scientist / technological personnel in R&D): the person working in the creation of new
knowledge, products, processes, methods and systems and the management of the pertaining projects. It
includes the senior personnel that develop planning and management activities of the scientific and technical
aspects of the researchers’ work.
Research scholarship holder: this is the person who carries out S&T activities under the supervision of a
researcher, usually with training purposes.
Technician: The person whose work requires knowledge and experience of a technical nature in one or in
several fields of the knowledge. They carry out their tasks under the supervision of an investigator. In
general, they are: laboratory assistants, draftsmen, engineers’ assistants, photographers, mechanical and
electrical technicians, programmers, etc.
Other support staff: the persons cooperating with support services to the S&T activities, such as of office
personnel, workers, etc. This category includes managers and administrators who deal with financial
problems, personnel, etc., whenever their activities are related to the S&T.
R&D projects: It is a coordinated set of specific scientific and technological tasks that partially or totally
involve R&D activities and that, from preexisting knowledge, makes it possible to reach an objective whose
characteristics have been previously established and/or to increase the knowledge.
Field of science: it corresponds to the science or disciplines in which people work or the scientific and
technological activities are developed.
Socio-economic objectives: they correspond to the economic application area of the S&T activity results.
70
TYPE OF INSTITUTIONS PERFOMING S&T ACTIVITIES IN ARGENTINA
National Council on Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET): it is a public institution recognized as
the most important multi-disciplinary institution for production and support to science and technology in the
country. It comprises more than 100 performing units, which hold: regional centers, institutes and national
laboratories.
Others public institutions: they correspond to the remaining institutions in the national and provincial public
administration which totally or partially carry out S&T activities (CNEA,CONAE, INTA, INTI, etc.).
Public universities: they are the institutions responsible for public high education. Professors carry out the
investigations with full or part time positions, usually as a complement of their teaching tasks. In the survey,
this group does not include CONICET researchers who develop within the physical location of the university.
Private universities: they are the institutions responsible for private high education. Research is also a
complement of the educational activity performed in these organizations.
Business enterprises: the firms fundamentally carry out applied research and experimental development
aimed to the production of goods. Their objectives are related not only to the creation of new products for the
market, but also to the decrease of costs, manufacture times and quality improving of those products
traditionally made with the purpose of increasing the sales and/or the benefits.
Non-profit private institutions: this group comprises, among others, associations, societies and
foundations that carry out some type of S&T activity. The objective of the research is not the profit. They fulfill
an important role performing technological services, such as the diffusion of S&T.
71
TECHNICALS ABREVIATIONS:
ACRONYMS:
72
Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología
Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva
Av. Córdoba 831
(C1054AAH) Ciudad de Buenos Aires
REPUBLICA ARGENTINA
Phone/Fax: (54 11) 4311-0333
E-mail: releva@correo.secyt.gov.ar
Web site: www.secyt.gov.ar
73