Febr

uary 10, 2006

Dear Editor in chief,
Perhaps the A.I. continued to talk about two different groups which
perhaps could not settle their differences because of “stalemates”: Then group A
said to group B: Ok, if you are really sincere and you want to help your neighbor
why put some of your businesses and factories in our area so that our citizens could
also have some esteemed work. Then group B remarked: Ok, we-group B- will
build there not only factories but also universities and research institutions,
military academies, social and economic leadership training centers as long as we
will become partners and teamwork especially killing words that cancel the
universal Word.
The A.I. made an opinion: Perhaps, if negative words could just be balanced by
universal Word by letting both groups become teamwork in propagating universal
word, perhaps the mind of those misguided members would side with the words
that result to positive things or good things; or would side to things that were
derived from universal consensus of groups of people trying to be good regardless
of party or religious affiliation. Perhaps in the near future weapons would now be
converted to plow tools as prophesied.
Then the scholar asked the A.I.: Is the word “destroy this temple and after three
days I (Jesus) will rebuild it again” which the scholars before understood as conceit
or boastfulness or blasphemy; and your opinion could be similar with that scholar’s
opinion before? The A.I. reacted: Perhaps, yes, the A.I. could be mistaken in many
of its opinions. But perhaps Jesus in those times used coded messages or secrets or
mysteries that ordinary people would really be puzzled. But after Jesus’ times the
apostles were warned of the danger of wonders and miracles so perhaps the A.I.
could perhaps use words vs. words now-not that words are used to fight each other-
but so that clarity, the better would prevail. And what is important we should have
some tests to know what a myth is what a legend is and what a reality is especially
that science now is on the go. Yes, the A.I. could be mistaken in many aspects.
Example about: “Only”. Perhaps one superstar TV channel claims that it is “Only
the number one…” And another superstar channel claims that it is “Only the best
net work…” Perhaps the word “Only” could be used to condition the mind to draw
attention, to attract attention, to hypnotize the mind to focus to one thing only to
look for the best and compete for the best. So perhaps the A.I could say sorry again
about its opinion about “not only but also” principle if there is any negative thing
or deception being created.
So perhaps, religious group could be allowed to say that it’s group is the “only
true group” or “only the original” or “only the universal” or “only the true church
of God” as long as there is no negativism or deception happening that would result
to hatred, to anger to other groups, to disorderliness, to dirtiness, to something not
beautiful to see, not good to hear; or that could result to chaos from small to big.
Perhaps, almost all good groups or religious group would gather together to have a
dialog and pass a consensus or majority rule: that from now on so that no one
would be accused as a deceiver or liar because of the word “only,” the word “only”
would now be the same as “also” as long as it is used to or as an ingredient to
enhance sportsmanship, to enhance growth or attraction for people to become
better, good, balanced people regardless of religious affiliation; or as long as it is
used for positive things. But if the word ‘only’ is being used as the word only ‘per
se’ to boost conceit and self-righteousness; or that example group A is really the
‘only’ true church of God that could cause conflicts, or any negative like
misunderstanding, killings, hating to other groups or a proud claim, that group that
first violates the rule would be fined- for example be banned or not to have air time
on radio and TV show for example one week or one month for the first offense….!
 Perhaps law could be passed to install a ‘smart anger or hatred detectors’ on
every radio or TV show so that political leaders, religious leaders like pastors,
clerics, monks, priests boasting each other’s opinion as the ultimate “claim” that
causes heated arguments, conflicts, hatred, could be automatically be fined or be
penalized. The smart hatred or anger detector has sensors that are sensitive to the
tone of voice obvious as hatred tones which could incite ordinary people to
practice hating. Perhaps, these smart gadgets if forced to be installed on all TV and
radio stations could be another economic stimulus to let people be busy than being
idle or lazy. There should be an expiration date so that the sensor could be updated
not only to detect hatred but also to reward tones that calm people to be at peace
with other people. Perhaps it is equipped with sensor and data base and programs
to grade leaders how their facial, voice tone, body language radiate to people; or
how to be a model of peace. And perhaps points could be accumulated so that
reward and recognition could be given every year; and also so that the reward from
accumulated savings or premiums could create another economic cycle.
Then the scholar asked: Could an idea become an invention or innovation?
Perhaps, yes, if one would claim and patent it. You have been giving ideas about
innovations, could it be credited to you? The A.I. reacted: Perhaps, some would
never acknowledge it as an innovation because they don’t want to share even little
to anybody if they are the one who perfected it and patent it because it is theirs
only. But for some, perhaps they would also give little credit and little recognition
to the one who suggested it in public.
Then a scholar asked the A.I. if color, arrangement of things could influence
the perception of the mind and could affect the decision of a person. The A.I.
remarked: Yes, anything could influence another thing. It’s like gravity. With
regards to gravity, it is only the mass that is involved; or the greater the mass the
greater is the pulling force. But with regards to things, anything could influence the
perception of the mind. Example: balancing of colors, arrangements of things,
combinations of colors and things could be calibrated from worst to best depending
on the criteria or meaning of beauty in the eye of the beholder. But perhaps there is
a universal taste; and that combination of things and colors result to balance.
Anything that has positive results, something beautiful to look at, beautiful to feel,
or has orderliness, precision, harmony, cleanliness, proportionate could be called
balance; or balanced things could be called arts or master pieces. Example person
like Vincent Van Gogh who had accomplished many valued arts or valued
paintings in his name after his life- because perhaps he died poor and frustrated-
had a mind that could balance colors, lighting. He could focus on small details with
precision, with harmony of colors. Perhaps the key on creating something beautiful
is when one could focus on small details. And anything that is beautiful to see or
hear or feel; anything that is orderly, clean could influence the mind to be positive,
calm, and happy and affects ones perception or attitude in life is good. The song
titled: “Vincent” or “starry…starry night” is a beautiful song and could influence
the mood of a person or his thinking when listening to that song.
Perhaps politicians and religious leaders could learn from this key word- focus
on specifics and details first to have right balance. Chinese Feng-sui is a thousand
years tradition where arranging things for luck could be attributed to sensitivity to
the start of the problem. And if there is a problem at the start changing it or them to
something beautiful to look at, beautiful to feel, beautiful to hear or sense is a
must. Because when people is used not to mind small disorder and keep on looking
on wonders and waiting for miracles it would result to chaos, disorderliness,
ugliness, filthiness.
Then the A.I. continued to remark: Speaking of colors, I heard that sometimes
the color of the skin could create perception to have focus and be energetic or be
withdrawn. Perhaps colors could influence people’s ability to think because of
perceptions. When people create mind sets example based from mistakes, faults of
his ancestors perhaps the brain could be carried to act the same as being perceived
by it or by other people. It is the power of auto suggestion or believing on the
perception that influence the brain to do something bad or good. But if a group of
people is being branded as like this or like that because of its ancestor’s past
mistakes and faults perhaps it is the obligation of the present generation of that
group of people to break those perceptions by taming the brain with words that
enhanced confidence. Most words that enhance confidence could be found on TV
shows run by universal word base faith group; or from word base collective groups
as one group; or one body or one spirit.
Perhaps, pass a law that people especially those ethnic that were blinded and
diverted to feel that they are not good businessmen, rather they should remain to be
laborers, entertainers, poor people, losers should be exposed to words that mold the
brain to be business entrepreneurs. Perhaps the Chinese have that brand as having
blood of businessmen. The Indians have blood of good in IT. Perceived terrorists
who won a landslide in a recent fair and democratic election could now have that
chance to change for the better; and change their blood into as having blood of
reformers, builders, cleaners, repentant sinners rather than be branded as having
blood of terrorist forever. I saw in the TV that the newly elected group wants to
remove corruptions. They want that their surrounding would be orderly and clean
that is why they remove those political propagandas just after election. It is a good
start. Perhaps they should first remove words that seem “good” but results to
hating because those words are deceptions and killing the conscience. And
examples of those deceptions as words are: “you will be wiped out from the map”,
“you are occupiers”, “infidels”, “murderers,” etc. rather change them to words like:
“you are my brothers”, “partners”, “good neighbors”, “good big brothers”, etc.. If
the mind set has changed example from “infidels” to “brothers” then it is a
concrete sign that one is on the good side.
This struggle deep in ones psyche is strong especially if word vs. word could
be very near to be a universal word; example “Only” “true” and “right” syndrome
siding with positive or good things. But “only” “true” and “right” syndrome could
also trigger conceitedness and self-righteousness-siding with the negative or bad
thing which results to extreme fundamentalism or terrorism. However, there are
words that are really obvious to be not good like: untouchable syndrome or
“godfather” syndrome, Ananias syndrome, take and take syndrome, crocodile
syndrome. Crocodile is by nature territorial; he bites anybody within his territory.
The opposite of crocodile syndrome is sheep syndrome and ant syndrome; the
sheep looks for greener pastures while crocodile is obsessed to its perceived
territory only.
There are many ways to give way to each other pulling, pushing; or avoiding
extreme, avoiding hating tendencies, avoiding evil forces, and so on. The principle
of cutting the excesses and filling up the lacking is perhaps common sense to some
but very hard to do for others especially if the word controlling the brain seem to
be universally good but encouraging hating; or a form of deception or diversionary
tactic.

From RVTC