Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Negotiable Instruments
58
The word negotiable means transferable and the word instrument means a written document by which a right is created in favour of some person. Negotiable instrument means a written document transferable by delivery or endorsement and delivery. Section 13 "a negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or Cheque payable either to order or to bearer". Section 31 of the 1. No person in India other than the RBI or the C. Govt. can make or issue a Reserve Bank of promissory note payable to bearer. India Act 2. No person in India other than the RBI or the C. Govt. can draw or accept a bill of exchange payable to bearer on demand. 3. A Cheque payable to bearer on demand can be drawn on a person's account with a banker. The effect of the above provisions is that (i) A promissory note cannot be originally made payable to bearer, no matter whether it is payable on demand or after a certain time. (ii) A bill of exchange may be originally made payable to bearer but it must be payable otherwise than on demand. (iii) A Cheque drawn on a bank can be originally made payable to bearer on demand and it shall be valid. Characteristics of a 1. Easy Negotiability: These are transferable from one person to another negotiable without more formality. instrument 2. Transferee Can sue in his own name without giving notice to the debtor : The creditor can ether recover this amount himself or can transfer his right to another person. 3. Better title to a transferee for value: A bonafide transferee of a negotiable instrument for value (i.e. holder in due course) gets the instrument free from all defects. Presumptions as to Negotiable Instruments: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii)
(viii)
that every negotiable instrument was made, drawn, accepted, endorsed or transferred for consideration; that every negotiable instrument bearing a date was made or drawn on such date; that every bill of exchange was accepted within a reasonable time after its date and before its maturity . that every transfer of a negotiable instrument was made before its maturity; that the endorsements appearing upon a negotiable instrument were made in the order in which they appear thereon; that a lost negotiable instrument was duly stamped that the holder of a negotiable instrument is holder in due course; that the instrument was dishonored, in case a suit upon a dishonored
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
59
instrument is filed with the court and the fact of protest is proved. Promissory note Section. 4, a promissory note is an instrument in writing (not being a bank note or a currency note) containing an unconditional undertaking signed by the make or to pay a certain Sum of money only to or to the order of a certain person or to the bearer of the instrument. Essentials of a Promissor y Note It must be in writing (ii) It must contain promise to pay: The undertaking to pay may be gathered either from express words or by necessary implication. A mere acknowledgement of indebtedness is not a promissory note although is its valid as an agreement and may be sued upon as such. (iii) The promise to pay must be unconditional : The promise to pay must not depend upon the happening of some uncertain event i.e., a contingency of the fulfillment of condition. It must be payable absolutely. (iv) It must be signed by the maker (v) The instrument itself must indicate with certainty who is the person or are the persons engaging himself or themselves to pay. (vi) The payee must be certain: Like the maker the payee of a promissory note must also be certain on the face of the instrument. (vii) The sum payable must be certain: But according to section 5, the sum does not become indefinite merely because: the amount is to be paid at an indicated rate of exchange or according to the course of exchange; The amount is payable by installments even with a provision that on default being made in payment of an installment the balance unpaid shall become due. The amount payable must be legal tender money of India: A document containing a promise to pay a certain amount of foreign money or to deliver a certain quality of goods is not a promissory note. (viii) Other formalities : Though is usual and proper to state in a not the place where is made and the date on which it is made but their omission will not render the instrument invalid. But a promissory not e must be properly stamped and stamp must also be duly cancelled. (i)
BILL OF EXCHANGE Section 5:- A bill of exchange is a instrument is writing containing an unconditional order signed by the maker directing a certain person to pay a certain sum of Money only to or to the order of a certain person or to bearer of the instrument.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
60
Essentials of Bills
(i)
(ii)
It must be in writing it must contain an order to pay. A mere request to pay will not amount to an order. but an order may be expressed in polite language The order to pay must be unconditional. It must be signed by the drawer The drawer draw and payee must be certain. The sum payable must be certain The bill must contain an order to pay money only. It must comply with the formalities as regards date, consideration & stamps etc.
CHEQUE
Section 6 A Cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker and not exposed to be payable otherwise than on demand and it includes the electronic image of a truncated cheque and a cheque in the electronic form A cheque in the electronic form means cheque which contains the exact mirror image of a proper cheque, and is generated, written and signed in a secure system ensuring the minimum safety standards with the use of digital signature and asymmetric crypto system. A truncated cheque means a chque which is truncated during the course of a clearing cycle, either by the clearing house or by the bank whether paying or receiving payment, immediately on generation of an electronic image for transmission the further physical movement of the cheque in writing. Two distinctive features: it is always drawn on a bank, and (ii) it is always payable on demand.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
61
(i) (ii)
(iii)
A Cheque is always drawn on a banker, while a bill may be drawn on any person including a banker. A Cheque can only be drawn payable on demand, whereas a bill may be drawn payable on demand or on the expiry of a certain period after date of sight. A Cheque drawn payable to bearer on demand is valid but a bill drawn payable to bearer on demand is absolutely void and illegal through a bill can be made payable to the bearer after a certain time. A Cheque does not require any acceptance. But a bill required acceptance by the drawee before the can be made liable upon it. A Cheque does not require any stamp whereas a bill of exchange must be property stamped. Three days of grace are allowed while calculating the maturity date in the case of time bills (i.e. bills drawn payable after the expiry of a certain period). Since a Cheque is always payable on demand there is no any days of grace. Unlike cheque bill cannot be crossed, Unlike cheque the payment of a bill cannot be countermanded by the drawer. Unlike bills there is no system of noting or protest in the case of a Cheque. The drawer of a bill is discharged from liability if it is not duly presented for payment but the drawer of a Cheque will not be discharged by delay of the holder in presenting it for payment unless through the delay the drawer has been injured by the failure of the bank.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
62
capacity at the date of the note or the bill, to endorse the same. CHEQUE Crossing of cheque Types of crossing (1) General or (2) Special.
General Crossing Sec- Where a cheque bears across its face an additions of the words, and company 123 or any abbreviation thereof, between two parallel transverse lines or of two parallel transverse lines simply either with or without the words not negotiable that additions shall be deemed a crossing and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally.
Special
Crossing Here a cheque bears across its face, an addition of the name of a bank, either Section. 124 with or without the words not negotiable the addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed to that banker.
Not Crossing
Negotiable The effect of inclusion of such words will be not to render the cheque non transferable. But as per section 130, a person who takes such as cheque shall not have and shall not be capable of giving a better title to the cheque than that which the person from whom the took.
Account Crossing
Payee An A/c payee crossing signifies that the drawer intends the payment to the credited only to the payee's account.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
63
Not
Negotiable A/c The instrument is rendered not negotiable plus A/c payee crossing directs the Payee collecting banker to collect if for the payee only and warns that if the amount Crossing is collected for someone else, he may be held liable for damages. The drawer has the right to cancel the crossing by writing the words pay cash and putting the full signatures.
Opening of Crossing
BANKER AND CUSTOMER There is no statutory definition of the term banker and customer. Banker: The business of a banker in ordinary course consists in receiving money from or n account of a customer and repaying the same on demand. The Negotiable Instruments Act defines a banker as including any person acting as a banker. The Banking Regulation Act, 1949 defines a banking company as a company which transacts the business of banking in India. The term banking has been defined as accepting for the purpose of lending or investment of deposits of money from the public repayable on demand or otherwise, and withdrawable by cheque, draft, order or otherwise. Customer: A customer is a person who has some sort of account either deposit or current account with the banker LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BANKER AND CUSTOMER The relationship between a banker and his customers is essentially contractual and is that of debtor (the banker) and creditor (the customer). This relation ship is sometimes reversed. This happens when the banker lends money to the customer .The relationship also partakes many aspects of relationship of agent and principal. Special features of legal relationship: Obligation to honour cheques. Obligation to keep proper of transactions. Obligation to abide by the express instructions of the customer. Obligation not to disclose the state of his customers account or affairs. Right of general lien. Right to charge incidental charges and interest on money lent. Right of appropriation. Protection of paying Banker The bankers are placed in privileged position as regards the payments of their customer cheques. Where a cheque payable to order purports to be endorsed by on or behalf of the payee, the drawee is discharged by payment in due course. Where a cheque is originally expressed to be bearer thereof, notwithstanding that any such endorsement purports to restrict or exclude further negotiation. The collecting banker may collect the proceeds of a cheque in the capacity of an agent of his customer, or a holder in due course. Collecting banker as an agent. The position of the collecting banker as an agent may be studied in
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
64
relation to crossed cheques and open cheques. Crossed cheques. A banker who has in good faith and without negligence received payment for a customer of a cheque crossed generally or specially to himself does not in case the title to the cheque proves defective, incur any liability to the true owner of the cheque by reason only of having received such payment [Section 131] Open cheques Section 131 omits a reference to open or uncrossed cheques. Presumably it does not afford protection to the collecting banker as regards collection of uncrossed cheques. Collecting banker as a holder in due course If a collecting banker acquires a cheques for value and in good faith, he collects it for himself and has all the privileges of a holder in due course.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
65
PRACTICAL PROBLEM
Are the following instruments promissory notes: I promise to pay B Rs. 5,000 on the death of C provided he leaves me sufficient amount to pay the sum. I acknowledge myself to be indebted to B in Rs. 5,000 to be paid on demand to B on his attaining the age of majority. [Hint. (a) No. (b) No.] A bill is drawn payable at 50 Lucknow Road, Kanpur but does not contain the name of the drawee, B who resides at 50, Lucknow Road, Kanpur accepts the bill. Is it a valid bill? [Hint: Yes. When B accepts it he holds out by his acceptance that he is the person to whom the bill is directed [Section: 54 Gray v. Milner) A signs as maker a blank stamped paper and gives it to B, and authorises himto fill it as a note for Rs. 500to secure an advance which C is to make to B. B fraudulently fills it up as a note for Rs. 2,000, payable to C who has in good faith advanced Rs. 2,000. Can c recover Rs. 2,000? [Hint: Yes ] A sign as acceptor a bill bearing an 80 P, stamp with the amount left blank. The amount of Rs. 100 in the margin is fraudulently altered to Rs. 1,000 and the bill is in words, filled in for a thousand rupees. The bill gets into the hands of H, a holder in due course. Can he recover this amount? [Hint: Yes] D drew a bill on A in favour of P. The bill was payable on demand. When the payee sought to present the bill for acceptance or payment he discovered that no such person as A existed. (a) is this a valid bill ? (b) To whom should P go for the money? [Hint : (a) No, as the drawee is not certain (b) D]. W dismissed his servant R from service and for his wages gave him a draft in the following words: Mr. N will much oblige Mr. W by paying to Mr. R or order, rupees two hundreds on his account. Signed by W. is this draft a bill of exchange ? [Hint :Yes, as the introduction of the words of gratitude does not destroy the order to pay] A Company issued a cheque on its bankers. A receipt was appended to the cheque and it ordered the banker to make the payment provided the receipt form at foot hero of is duly signed stamped and dated. Is the cheque valid ? [Hint : No, because its payment is made conditional upon signing of the receipt] A accepts a bill for the accommodation of B (the drawer). The bill is dishonoured by A on the due date and C, the holder of the bill, on that date collects the amount from B. Can B sue A for the recovery of the amount? Will it make any difference if the bill gets into the hands of a holder in due course and he files a suit against A for the recovery of the amount? [Hint : (a) No, B cannot sue A for the recovery of the amount on the bill. (b) The holder in due course can recover the amount from A]
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
66
Chapter 2
Escrow:
Lost Instruments:
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
67
be able to get a valid discharge for it. Bona fide transferee for value acquires a valid title to it and entitled both to retain the instrument as against the rightful owner and to compel payment from the parties liable thereon. If the finder forges the Endorsement of the loser and negotiates it to a bona fide transferee for value. The latter acquires no legal title to it. Stolen Instruments A person who has obtained a negotiable instrument by theft cannot enforce payment. If the thief negotiates the instrument to a purchaser for value who has notice of the theft, the transferee cannot acquire a better title. If a person who has stolen a bill or note payable to bearer transfers it to a holder in due course, he confers a good title on him or any person deriving title from such holder. A person who obtains an instrument by fraud has no right to claim money thereupon, the consent of the party not being free. The transferee if aware of the fraud shall not be entitled to claim any payment. The defense of fraud cannot, in general, be set up against a holder in due course or a holder deriving a title from such holder. If the consideration for a negotiable instrument is unlawful, the instrument is void. A holder in due course however obtains a good title to an instrument.
As a general rule, a forged signature is worthless and confers no title. The holder of a forged instrument cannot, enforce payment thereon, can he give a valid discharge therefor. The true owner can compel the debtor to pay it again to him. Even a holder in due course cannot. claim payment on a forged instrument Person whose signature have been forged -may, be his conduct, be estopped from denying its genuineness to an Innocent holder. When a bill is drawn is sets known as the bill in sets, bills in sets are usually drawn when they are to be sent from one Country to another. The parts of a bill in set are sent by different mail routes in order to ensure the safe transmission of at least one part. Sections 132 and 133 provide the following rule for a bill in sets. Bills of exchange may be drawn in sets or parts. Each part of a bill in set should be numbered and must contain a provision that is shall continue, payable only so long as the other parts remain unpaid. The drawer must sign each part of the bill and should deliver all the parts. But only one part is required to be stamped and only one parts is to
Bills in Sets
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
68
be accepted the drawee. If payment is made on one of the parts of the bill, the whole bill is extinguished. Where a person accepts or endorses different parts of the bill in favour of different persons, he and the subsequent endorsers of part are liable on such part as if it were a separate bill. When two or more parts of a set are negotiated to different holders in due course, then as between holders in due course in who first acquired the title to the other and money represented by the bill. Accommodation Bill The drawer does not give any consideration to the drawee but instead it is drawn with an object of providing financial help to the drawer or to both the drawer and the drawee. Thus the relationship between the drawer and the drawee is not that of creditor and a debtor. Actually it is a sort of mercantile credit where one person lends out his name on the bill so that the other person taking the bill can get the same discounted from the bank and get money for the same. The rule In regarding accommodatio n bill. An accommodation bill creates no obligation of payment between the parties to the transaction. The accommodation party is liable on the bill to any subsequent holder for value even if the holder knew at the time of taking the bill that it is an accommodation bill (Sec. 43). An accommodation bill can be negotiated after maturity with all benefits of a holder in due course (Sec. 59). Non Presentment of an accommodation bill to the acceptor for payment does not discharge drawer. when an accommodation bill is dishonored, failure to give notice of dishonor does not discharge the liability of prior parties.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
69
Fictitious Bill
When in a bill of exchange the names the drawer or the payee or both are fictitious the bill is said to be a fictitious bill Such a bill is drawn in a fictitious name and is made payable to the drawer's order and as such that a names of both the drawer and the payee are said to be of a fictitious person. However, such a bill if accepted in due course it can be a good bill provided he can show that the first endorsement on the bill and the signature of the supposed drawer (being the holder as well) are in the same handwriting and the acceptor is liable on the bill to him) Sec. 42. When documents relating to the goods represented by some documents e.g., bill of lading or railway receipt invoice, marine insurance policy etc., are attached to a bill, the bin is called a documentary bill. Such documents are delivered to the buyer only on acceptance or payment of the bill.
Documentary Bill
Inland and Foreign A promissory note or bill which is drawn or made in India and also Instruments: made payable in India or, drawn in India upon. any person resident in India (Sec. 11). although it may be made payable in a foreign county are deemed to be Inland instrument . All other bills are known as foreign bill.
Material alteration:
Any change in an instrument (a) which causes it to speak a different language in effect from that which it original spoke, or if (b) which changes the legal identity or character of the instrument either in its terms or the relation of the parties to it, is a material alteration, ;
Instances of material alteration are:
(i) date; (ii) the time of payment; (iii) the place of payment; (iv) the sum payable; (v) the number of parties; (vi) the relationship between parties; (vii) legal character of the instrument; (viii) opening a crossed cheque; (ix) converting an order cheque into a bear cheque. Any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the same void (i) filing blanks of the instrument; (ii) conversion of blank endorsement into endorsement in full; (iii) crossing of cheques; (iv) altering a general crossing into a special ; (v) canceling the word bearer and making the cheque payable to order; and alteration made with the consent of the parties,
Example
Effect of alteration The effect of a material alteration of a negotiable instrument is only to [Sec. 87] discharge those who become parties thereto prior to the alteration. But if an alteration is made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties, it does not render the instrument void. Any material alteration, if made
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
70
by an endorsee, discharges his endorser from all liability to him in respect of the consideration thereof.
Maturity of Negotiable Instruments: Maturity means the date on which the payment of a instrument falls due. As instrument payable on demand or at sight becomes payable immediately on the date of its execution and there is no question of its maturity. Rules for calculating maturity: (Section 23 to 25) 1. Payable after a stated number of months, 3 days after the corresponding date of the month of payment 2. If the month has no corresponding date, on the last day of such month, 3. Payable after a certain number of days, exclude the day on which the instrument is drawn presented for acceptance or Sight or on which the event happens. 4. If the date on which a bill or note is mature is a public holiday the instrument shall be deemed to be due on the immediately preceding business day. 5. The expression public holiday includes Sunday and other day notified in the official Gazette to be public holiday under this act. 6. If it is a emergency holiday on subsequent date. If an instrument is payable by installment three days of grace are to allowed on each installment
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
71
Payment of Interest
When rate specified expressly on instrument: Calculated at thc Rate specified on the amount of the principal money due from the date of the instrument until realization or until such date in case of a suit to recover such amount as the court directs (Sec. 79). When no rate specified 18% p. a. When the party charged is the endorser of instrument dishonored by nonpayment, he is liable to pay 'interest only from the time that he receives notice of the dishonor
HUNDI Hundis are negotiable instruments written in Hindustani language. Sometimes they are in the form of promissory notes but more often they take the form of a bill of exchange. The provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act apply to Hundi unless there is a local usage to the contrary. Type Darshani Hundi. It is one payable at sight like a demand bill. Miadi or Muddati hundi : It is one payable after a specified period of time like a time bill. Shah jog hundi : This is a hundi made payable only to a Shah. A shah means a respectable person. Nam jog hundi: Where a hundi is made payable to or to the under of specified person is called a Nam jog hundi. Nishan Jog- Hundi : A Nishan jog hundi is payable only to the persons who presents it The word Nishan -Jog is inserted-in the hundi.
Jokhmi hundi :
The term jokhmi means against risk. A jokhmi hundi therefore is combination of bill of exchange and insurance policy.
Dhani Jog Hundi:
Chapter 3
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
72
Distinction between negotiation and assignment Negotiation 1. Consideration is presumed. 2. The title of the transferee (i.e., the bolder in due course) is better than that of the transferor. 3. Notice of transfer to the debtor by the transferee is not necessary .The acceptor of a bill and the maker of a note are liable on maturity to the holder in due course of the instrument. Instruments payable to bearer are negotiated by mere delivery and instruments payable to order are negotiated by endorsement and delivery. 1. Consideration must be proved. 2. The title of the assignee is subject to the title of the assignor 3. An assignment does not bind the debtor notice of the assignment has been given by assignee to the debtor, and the debtor has expressly or impliedly, assented to it. 4. An assignment can only be made in writ either on the instrument itself or in a separate document transferring to the assignee transferor's rights in the instrument.
Assignment
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
73
Type
Negotiation by mere delivery: A negotiable instrument payable to bearer Negotiation by endorsement and delivery: Payable to order.
If the endorser sign his name only and does not specify the name of the Endorsee is said to be in blank. Endorsement in full or special Endorsement: If the endorser in addition to his signature also adds a direction to pay the amount to or to the order of a specified person the Endorsement is said to be in full. Endorsement in blank followed by an endorsement in full. If an instrument endorsed in blank followed (which becomes payable to bearer) is subsequently endorsed in full, it remains payable to bearer and negotiable by delivery as against all the parties prior to the endorser in full. Such endorser in full cannot be held liable on the instrument except by the endorsee in whose favour such endorsement in full is made or by any party who derives a title through such endorse in full [sec 55]. Partial Endorsement: A negotiable instrument cannot be endorsed for a part of the amount appearing to be due on the instrument. In other words a partial instrument which transfer the right to receive only a part payment of the amount due on the instrument is invalid. Restrictive Endorsement: An Endorsement which, by express words, prohibits the endorsee from further negotiating the instrument is called Restrictive Endorsement.
Conditional Endorsement:
If the endorser of a negotiable instrument, by the express words in the Endorsement, makes his liability, dependent on the happening of a specified event, although such event may never happen, such Endorsement is called a Conditional Endorsement (Sec. 52) Sans recourse Endorsement When the endorser expressly excludes his own liability in the negotiable instrument to the endorsee or any subsequent holder in case of dishonor of the instrument .the Endorsement is known as " Sans recourse" Endorsement.
Facultative Endorsement:
When the endorser expressly gives up some of his rights under the negotiable instrument, the endorsement is called a facultative endorsement.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
74
Negotiation Back During the course of negotiation if a negotiable instrument is reendorsed by the last endorsee to the, original holder or previous endorser, it is called a negotiation back. Chapter 4
Presentment means showing a negotiable instrument to the drawee, acceptor or maker for (1) acceptance or (2) sight (3) payment.
Modes of acceptance:
An acceptance may be general or qualified. General acceptance: Qualified acceptance: When the drawee, while accepting the bill, does not attach any condition or qualification to it. The acceptance is qualified when it is given subject to some condition or qualification. The holder may refuse to take the qualified acceptance, and treat the bill as dishonored by non-acceptance. But if he takes it he does so at his own risk and discharges all parties prior to himself unless he obtains their consent to such acceptance.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
75
(i) where it is intentionally prevented by the maker drawee or acceptor, or (ii) where the business of the maker, drawee or acceptor is closed or he cannot after due search be found or there is no person at the place of payment, or (iii) where there is a promise to pay notwithstanding non-presentment, or (iv) where presentment is expressly or impliedly waived, or (v) where the bill is dishonoured by non acceptance or (vi) where the drawee is a fictitious person, or (vii) where the presentment becomes impossible.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
76
Dishonour
A bill may be dishonoured by non-payment or by non-acceptance. A promissory note and a cheque are dishonoured by non- payment. Dishonour by Nonaccepta nce. Set. 91 When the drawee or one of several drawees (not being partners) makes default in acceptance. Where the presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill is not accepted i.e. remains unaccepted. When the drawee is incompetent to contract. Where the drqwee makes the acceptance qualified. If the drewee is a fictitious person or after reasonable search cannot be found A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque is said to be dishonored by non-payment when the maker of the note, acceptor of the bill or drawee of the cheque makes default in payment upon being duly required to pay the same Sec. 92). Also a promissory note or bill of exchange is dishonored by non-payment when presentment of payment is excused expressly be the maker of the note or acceptor of the bill and the note or bill remains unpaid at or after maturity (Sec. 76) As soon as a negotiable instrument is dishonoured the holder becomes entitle to sue the parties liable to pay thereon. The drawer of cheque, maker of note acceptor and drawer of bill and all the endorsers are liable severally and jointly to a holder in due course. Notice of dishonour must be given by the holder or any of the parties to the instrument who remains liable thereon (Sec. 93). Further any party receiving notice of dishonor must also transmit the same within a reasonable time to all prior parties in order to render them liable to himself. He cannot sue any prior party to whom the he has not transmitted the notice unless that party has received due notice from the holder or some other party to the instrument. Notice of dishonor can also be given by the duly Authorised agent of the person.
Notice to whom:
Dishonour by Nonpaymen t
Effect Dishonor:
of
Notice Dishonor:
of
Notice of dishonor must be given to all parties (other than the maker of a note acceptor of a bill, or drawee of cheque) to whom the holder seeks to make liable or to their duly Authorised agents. Where there are two or more persons jointly liable as drawer or endorses, notice to anyone of them is sufficient. In case of death of person, notice must be given to his legal representative, or where he has been declared an insolvent, it must be given to his official Assignee (Sec. 97). What is reasonable time: If the holder and the party to whom notice of dishonour is given carry on business or live in different places such notice shall be deemed to be given
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
77
within a reasonable time if it is dispatched by the next post or on the day next after the day of dishonour. If the holder and the party to whom notice of dishonour is given carry on business or live in same places such notice shall be given so as to received on day of dishonour or day after dishonour. When notice of dishonour is unnecessary: Section. 98, When it is dispensed with by the party entitled to the notice. When the drawer of a cheque has countermanded payment no notice of dishonour is required to charge the drawer. When the party charged could not suffer damage for want of notice. When the party entitle to notice cannot after due search be found or the party bound to give notice is because of some justifiable reason (e.g, death accident or serious illness), unable to give it. When the drawer also happens to be acceptor. In the case of promissory note which is not negotiable. When the party entitled to notice promises to pay unconditionally the amount due on the instrument after dishonor and with fun knowledge of facts. Any party to a negotiable instrument (other than the maker of a note acceptor of a bill or drawee of cheque) to whom notice of dishonour is not sent by the holder is discharged from his obligation under the instrument and cannot be used by the holder unless the circumstances are such that no notice of dishonour is required to be sent.
Noting
According to section 99, when a promissory note or a bill of exchange has been dishonored by nonacceptance or non-payment, the holder may cause such dishonour to be noted by a Notary upon the instrument or upon a paper attached thereto. Noting means recording the fact of Dishonour on the dishonored instrument or on paper attached thereto for the purpose. Noting must be made within a reasonable time after dishonour and must specify the date of dishonour the reason assigned for such dishonour and the notary's charges.
Protest :
Protest is a formal certificate of dishonour issued by the notary public to the holder of the bin or note on his demand (noting is merely a record of dishonour on the instrument itself) Sec. 100. Protest for better security When the acceptor of a bill of exchange become insolvent or his credit has been publicly impeached before the maturity of the bill the holder may within a reasonable time cause such facts to be recorded and certified as aforesaid such certificate is called a protest for better security . Noting and protest of inland bills or notes is not compulsory, but foreign bills must be protested for dishonour if so required by the law of the place where they are drawn (Sec. 104).
Discharge of an Instrument:
A negotiable instrument is said to be discharged when it becomes completely useless, i.e., no action on that will lie and it cannot be negotiated further. When the party primarily liable on the instrument makes the payment in due course to the holder at or after maturity (Sec. 78).
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
78
When a bin of exchange which has been negotiated is, at or after maturity, held by acceptor in his own right, the instrument in discharged (Sec. 90). When the party primarily liable becomes insolvent the instrument is discharged and the holder cannot make any other prior party liable thereon. When the holder cancels the instrument with an intention to release the party primarily liable thereon from the liability, the instrument is discharged and cases to be negotiable (Sec. 82.)
By release:
By payment:
By allowing If the holder of a bill or exchange, allows the drawee more than 48 hours exclusive drawee more than of public holidays to consider whether he will accept the same all parties not 48 hours to accept consenting to such allowance are thereby discharged from liability to such holder (Sec. 83): By taking If the holder of a bill agrees to a qualified acceptance all prior parties qualified whose consent is not obtained to such an acceptance are discharged from liability. acceptance (Sec. 86): By not giving Any party to a negotiable instrument (other than the party primari1y liable) notice of to whom notice of dishonours not sent by the holder is discharged form liability as dishonour: against the holder unless the circumstances are such that not notice of dishonour is required to be sent. By Non When a bill of exchange is payable certain period after sight its holder presentment of must present for acceptance to the drawee within a reasonable time after is its acceptance of bill: drawn. If the makes a default in making such presentment the drawer and all (Sec. 61) endorses who were liable towards such a holder are discharged from their liability towards him. By delay presenting cheque: (Section -84). in It is the duty of the holder of cheque to present its for payment with in reasonable time of its issue.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
79
By negotiation When a bill of exchange comes back to the acceptor by process of back of a bill: negotiation and he becomes its holder, it is called as negotiation back.
Bouncing of cheque
Section 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act provide for criminal penalties in the event of dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds. The drawer, under Sec. 138, may be punished with imprisonment upto 2 years or with a fine up to twice the amount of the cheque or with both. However, in order to attract the aforesaid penalties, following conditions must be statisfied. 1. The cheque should have been dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds in the account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person form out of that account. In case of stop-payment, it shall be deemed to have so dishonoured for insufficiency of funds unless stop-payment can be justified. 2. The payment for which the cheque was issued should have been in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability in whole or part of it. 3. The cheque should have been presented within 6 months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of validity, whichever is earlier. 4. The payee or the holder in due course of the cheque should have given notice demanding payment within 30 days. 5. The drawer is liable only if fails to make payment within 15 days of such notice. 6. The payee should have made complaint within 1 month of the cause of the action.
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
80
Practical Problems
a sells a radio to M, a minor, who pays for it by his cheque. A indorese the cheque to B, who takes it in good faith and for value. The cheque is dishonoured on presentation. Can B enforce payment of the cheque against A or M? [Hint: B can enforce payment of the cheque against A only [sec 26]. A executed a promissory note in favour of B without Bs demanding payments, A paid the money due on the note to B but left the note in his hands. Subsequently b endorsed the note of C for consideration. C had knowledge of the payment made by A, C brings a suit against A and B for recovery of money on the note. Will he succeed against either or both? [Hint : C can enforce payment against either A or both [sec 9 and 58] A gives a blank acceptance to one Banerjee who fills it up as a bill payable to the drawers order and himself signs it as the drawer and the first endorser in a ficitious name Jogender Lall. Is A or Banarjee liable to the holder of the bill. [Hint : Both A and Banarjee are liable to the holder of the bill [sec 41 and 42]. Moreover the acceptance in the instant case is blank and as such the instrument becomes payable to bearer. The right of the holder of the bill therefore will not be affected even if there is an endorsement in the name of fictitious plerson]
-M draws a cheque In favour of N, a minor. N Endorses it In favour of P, who In turn Endorses it In favour of Q. The cheque is dishonored by the bank. Examine the rights of P and Q. [Hint: P has the right to recover payment of the cheque from M only. Q can hold both P and M liable for payment of the cheque (Sec. 26)]. A, on attaining the age of majority, executes a fresh promissory note In consideration of a promissory note executed by him during his minority. Can a suit be maintained on the fresh promissory note? [Hint : No, as the fresh promissory note is void for want of consideration]
The director of a company borrowed Rs. 10,000 from A and executed a promissory note in favour of A. On the promissory note, there was no Indication if the money was borrowed for and on behalf of the company. The company used the money for its purposes. Can the company be held liable to repay the loan on the basis of the promissory note ? [Hint: No, the director is personally liable (Sec. 2)]. A bill of exchange purports to be drawn by A on B and is accepted by B. The bill is payable to C or order. C negotiates it to D who takes it as a holder In due course. In a suit by D on the bill, can B disclaim liability on the ground that A's signature is forged? [Hint: No. (Sec.120]. A signs his name on a blank but stamped instrument He gives the paper to B with authority to fill it up as a promissory note for Rs. 250 only. B fraudulently fills the paper for Rs. 1,000, the stamp put upon it being sufficient to cover the amount. He then hands it to H for Rs. 1,000 who takes it without notice of fraud. Is A bound to pay Rs. 1,000 to H? [Hint: Yes]. B obtains A's acceptance to a bill by fraud. B endorses it to C who take B it as a holder In due course. C endorses the bill to D who knows of the fraud. Can D recover from A?
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
81
[Hint: Yes, D can recover the amount form A as he derived his title from C who is a holder In due course. Moreover, D is not a party to the fraud. Once the title has been cleansed of the defect, notwithstanding notice of the fraud, D gets a good titleSec.53)]. A bill is addressed to Herbert Morris who is a partner in the firm of and Parker". Herbert Morris accepts the bill in the firm's name. Explain then he will be personally liable on the bill or not. [Hint: Herbert Moms is personally liable on the bill as acceptor]. A Drew cheques in favour of B. As clerk forged Bs endorsement and negotiated the cheques to C who took them in good faith and for value. C received payment of the cheques. A claims to recover the amount from C, will he succeed? [Hint: A will succeed if the cheque was an order cheque, but fall if the cheque was payable to bearer.] A the holder of a bill transfer it to B as payable to him or is order for the express purpose that it shall be discounted. B endorses it to C who takes it bona fide and for value. Discuss the position of C as against A and B. [Hint: C can hold both A and B liable for payment of the bill (sec. 46)] A owes B Rs. 3,000. He makes a promissory note for the amount payable to B. A dies and the note is after ward found among his paper and delivered to B Can B recover upon bill? [Hint: B cannot sue up on the note (sec. 46)] A accepted a bill and gave it to B who put his name as a drawer for the purpose of discounting it and paying the proceeds to A. B having failed to discount returned the bill to A who , intending to cancel it tore it into two and threw it into the street . B picked it up pieces and pasted tem together and put the bill into circulation. Examine the liability of A on the bill. [Hint: A is not liable as he did not delivered the bill(sec.46)] A endorses and delivers a cheque to B who keeps it for an unreasonable length; of time and then endorse d and delivers it to C. C present the cheque for payment within reasonable time after its receipt by him and it is dishonored Can C enforce payment against B or A or both. [Hint: C can enforce payment against B only] A bill of exchange payable three month after the date is altered to be payable three months after sight by the holder, and then endorsed to X. The drawee refuses to make payment. Can X enforce its payment against the drawer? [Hint: No, as the bill has materially altered (sec:87)] A draws a cheque for Rs.10000 on Bank Yon 25th may 1993 he has sufficient fund to his credit on that date; Bank Y fails on 25th June a1993, before the cheque is presented Advice the holder of the cheque as to; his course of action; [Hint: A is discharged from liability to the holder to the extant of actual damage suffer through the delay In the presentment of the cheque (sec.84)] A customer f XYZ Bank drew an open cheque for Rs.100 payable to G. the was stolen. The thief forged the payees endorsement and presented the cheque for payment at the branch upon which it was drawn. The bank cashier paid the cheque without asking for proof his identity. To whom is the bank liable for the cashier action?
Toppers Institute
Negotiable Instruments
82
[Hint: The bank is not liable to anyone and can debit the account of customer with the amount of cheque (sec 85(1)] A cheque drawn by A and payable to B passed by endorsement through the hand of several persons and was ultimately endorsed in favour of E. The cheque was dishonored on account of want of funds. Advise E. [Hint: E can hold all prior parties liabilities to him provided he gives them a notice of dishonour] A cheque is drawn payable to B or order. It is stolen and Bs endorsement is forged. The banker pays the cheque in due course. Is the banker discharged from liabilities? Would it make any different if the drawers signature is forged? [Hint: The banker is discharged from liability (sec 85)] Cheque payable to a company were endorsed by a director to himself in his capacity as director and paid into his personal account with bank for collection. The bank received the money and allowed him to withdraw. Is the bank liable to the company for conversion of its cheque ? [Hint: Yes, the bank is liable as it was guilty of negligible]