Guest Editorial

The International Classication of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Application to physiotherapy
The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 1951) For many decades now sociolinguists and social psychologists have been describing the way language can inuence action. The words we use can structure the way we think, the decisions we make, and actions we take. In physiotherapy therefore, the language we use to talk about pathology, injury, illness and disability can inuence our clinical decisions and the way we interact with our patients and other health professionals. In 1980 the World Health Organisation published the International Classication of Impairment, Disability and Handicaps (ICIDH), which provided health professions with a common language to describe and better understand processes of disability and rehabilitation. So signicant was this new language that Wade and Halligan (2003) recently described it as perhaps one of the greatest advances in rehabilitation in the last 20 years (p 349). The ICIDH has now been superseded by the International Classication of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which was endorsed by the World Health Assembly in May 2001. It is benecial for physiotherapists to have knowledge of how this classication system is structured and how it might be applied to the clinical environment. What is the ICF? There are two aspects to the ICF worth discussing here. Firstly, it is a conceptual framework that describes disability, functioning and consequences of health conditions. Secondly, it is a system of classication of the ways disability (and abilities) can manifest through activities and social roles as well as through biology, physiology and psychology. The ICF is not an assessment or measurement tool itself, but is a framework that can be applied to rehabilitation, government policy, disability services, or to assessment, outcome measurement and research. The ICF presents functioning and disability as multi-dimensional concepts, which relate to: a) body structures and body functions including physiological and psychological function, b) the activities and people do, and c) the life situation and social roles that people participate in. All these aspects of functioning can be directly or indirectly affected by health conditions, illness disorders, or disease processes, resulting in impairments, activity limitations, and/or participation restrictions. The ICF provides specic denitions for each of these as follows: Impairments are problems in body function or structure, such as a signicant deviation or NZ Journal of Physiotherapy March 2004. Vol. 32, 1 loss (e.g. raised blood pressure, pain, or cognitive deficits). Activity limitations are defined as difculties that an individual may have executing activities (e.g. inability to walk, dress oneself, or hang out washing). Participation restrictions are the problems that an individual may experience with involvement in life situations (e.g. inability to return to work, or inability to full ones normal social roles in a family). However, the ICF also describes how functioning and disability can be inuenced by environmental factors (such as the physical environment, physical aids and appliances, social policies, or even other people attitudes and beliefs) and by personal factors (such as ones ethnicity, gender, and personality characteristics). In this way, the ICF introduces sociocultural dimensions as well as biomedical ones into the language of disability and functioning. The interrelationships between all these factors and concepts are represented in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Interrelationship between the components of the ICF.

Health condition
(disorder or disease)

Body Functions and Structures

(Impairments)

(Activity Limitation)

Activity

Participation
(Participation Restriction)

Environmental Factors

Personal Factors

As mentioned, there is a more detailed classication system associated with this conceptual framework. Essentially this classication system is derived from a hierarchy of headings and subheadings, starting from the elements described in the conceptual framework above. Like the International Statistical Classication of Disease and Related Health Problems (ICD-10), the ICF uses an alphanumeric system to classify items relating to functioning and disability. For example, the code d4103 is used to classify difculties with getting into and out of a seated position from lying. Modiers can also be added to indicate the extent or magnitude of disabilities. For instance, a severe (but not complete) activity limitation related to getting from lying to sitting is represented by d4103.3 Application of the ICF The ICF has many uses. One specific use relates to the process of rehabilitation planning. 1

Patient assessment can be conducted using the ICF conceptual framework to better understand the genesis of the patients problems from a holistic perspective. Sociocultural as well as biomedical factors and the relationships between them can be explored when evaluating causes of problems, and therefore these factors can be considered when developing intervention strategies. For physiotherapists working in interdisciplinary teams, the common language provide by the ICF can be used to enhance communication and encourage collaboration between health professionals when planning patient goals or discussing rehabilitation problems. At the New Zealand Rehabilitation Conference held in Dunedin last year, a number of presenters described exactly this (Reardon and Harmon, 2003, and George and Ronaldson, 2003). When using the ICF in this manner, it is perfectly justiable to use the ICF denitions and conceptual framework without specic reference to the alphanumeric coding system (AIHW, 2003). In fact, while Wade and Halligan (2002) are extremely supportive of a conceptual framework describing the manifestations of functioning and disability, they question the validity of a universal descriptive classication system, and state that they themselves are not interested in this aspect of the ICF in their clinical work. Alternatively however, Steiner et al (2002), believe that the coding system contributes further to ensuring interdisciplinary team members have a common language to discuss rehabilitation case scenarios. In their use of the ICF for the development of a clinical planning tool, the Rehabilitation Problem-Solving Form, Steiner et al (2002) strongly encourage reference to the alphanumeric coding system to ensure consistency in the use of terminology across disciplines (p 1104). From a practical perspective however, one would need to consider the time and cost associated with training and supporting staff in the use of the coding system. Of course the ICF is not just limited to interdisciplinary rehabilitation services. It can also be useful for the individual clinician working in a small practice or in other specialised areas of physiotherapy. For instance, the ICF can provide an assessment structure that moves focus away from pathology when working with people who have chronic pain syndromes or acute low back pain with yellow ags. It can also be useful for conceptualising and prioritising a treatment plan for people who have other complex presentations, such as multiple injuries or challenging sociocultural backgrounds. Whatever the clinical work, the ICF encourages practitioners to move away from treating problems and towards treating people.

Websites for further information For further information on the ICF, two excellent websites are: The World Health Organisations website for the ICF: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate. cfm The website for Australian Collaborating Centre for the WHO Family of International Classications, which produces the Australian ICF Users Guide: http://www.aihw.gov.au/ disability/icf/index.html References
AIHW (Australian Collaborating Centre for the WHO Family of International Classications). ICF Australian User Guide (Version 1). Canberra: AIHW. George, J., and Ronaldson, A. (2003) Integrating the ICF into rehab practice a work in progress. New Zealand Rehabilitation Conference (Conference Programme and Abstracts): pp 20. Reardon, F., and Harmon, J. (2003) The seven minute challenge: The reality of MDT goal setting. New Zealand Rehabilitation Conference (Conference Programme and Abstracts): pp 16. Steiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D. Aeschlimann, A., and Stucki, G. 2002. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy. 82(11): 1098-1107. Wade D, and Halligan P. (2003) New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clinical Rehabilitation. 17(4): 349-354. WHO (World Health Organization). (1980). International Classification of Impairment, Disability, and Handicap. Geneva: WHO. WHO (World Health Organization). (1992). International Statistical Classication of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 1989 Revision. Geneva: WHO. WHO (World Health Organization). (2001) International Classication of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE

William Levack BPhty, MHealSc(Rehabilitation), Lecturer in Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand. Email: wlevack@wnmeds.ac.nz

P.L.E.S. Advert

NZ Journal of Physiotherapy March 2004. Vol. 32, 1