Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Tushar B Kute,
Lecturer in Information Technology,
K. K. Wagh Polytechnic, Nashik,
Maharashtra, India 422 003.
tushar.kute@gmail.com
Lectures (5%)
Reading (10%)
Demonstration (30%)
G. D. (50%)
Learning Pyramid
I imposed the factors in this pyramid onto students. These points of matter
are written below:
Preparation
Learning material
Students, whether they are of any discipline always try to use the textbooks
which contains the collective data of syllabus orientation. In case of diploma
students some local publications textbooks are available but while studying these
books I found a lot of mistakes in programs and in texts also. They have just copied
the contents from some reference book. So I took students away from using the
local textbooks. I gave them some reference books which I think good books for
students at diploma level. These are ‘Programming in ANSI C’ by E Balagurusamy
Punishment
In the first lecture itself I have warned all of them to do not remain absent for
any lecture. Those who have remained absent for any lecture, I have punished them
by giving them some programming assignment or any other work regarding the
subject. Many students completed given assignments. I think I have not succeeded
well in this.
Teaching Methodology
Visual Aids
This was the first time I used the transparencies to teach. Today I am having
nearly 120 transparencies on “Programming in C”. I always used to keep these
transparencies in front of students in order to fix the data on that in students’ minds.
Remember, transparencies play very important role in classroom teaching. I
prepared all these transparencies by myself. The diagrams drawn and program
illustrated are some from books and some are self prepared.
I also prepared the PowerPoint presentations for various demonstrations but
never got time to show them. Basically, we can show these at the time of practical.
Demonstration
Practical
If you observe the leaning pyramid given above; 75% of the knowledge can
be gained by practicing and doing. I think regarding programming subjects, we can
obtain more than 90% of knowledge by practicing. I always used to say my students
that ‘first perform the practical and then write the theory’. That is, without knowing
practical implementations we can not know the theoretical implementations. Just
don’t try to mug up anything.
I focused a lot on practical. For practical in the lab, I differentiated the
students as per their abilities of performing. I gave a single computer for every weak
students and another single computer for two clever students for performing
practical. The purpose was to compete between the clever students and to make the
weak students self-doers. The subject is having a laboratory manual. But it contains
many programming and theoretical mistakes. Besides this, it contains one solved
problem and five programming exercises. I distributed the unsolved programming
exercises differently for different students. So they were performing different-
different practical by avoiding the copying the programs. I imposed them to draw
flow-chart and write the algorithm for every problem. Here I found many students
were performing well.
Additional teaching
Many times when I found the students got bored in the lecture by continuous
harassment from morning, I used to change the subject. Then, I was telling different
moral stories and some puzzles to them. That time I found students are eager to
hear this!
Appraisal
I used to praise students for their good work, good logic in programming and
good paper writing also. Once I attached the Xerox copy of one of the girls answer
paper for other’s reference. It has created good impact on students and they got
moralized from this.
Programming Contests
From the first year itself I made all my students aware of programming
contests and forced them to participate in these. They gave overwhelming response
in some programming contests. I remember, in one of the programming contests
more than half of the class was participated. It has given them a good experience on
competition. I found some diamonds in programming. Minimum ten students were
‘very good’ in programming. In case of Computer Technology students this cane was
Pointers