2011

Universitt Bonn

H. Malistani

Geology and Genesis of Hajigak Iron Ore Deposit Bamyan, Central Afghanistan

Progress Report

Geology and Genesis of Hajigak Iron Ore Deposit, Bamyan, Central Afghanistan
Introduction
Hajigak Iron ore deposit is situated in the eastern part of Baba mountain range nearby the Hajigak pass (3443N, 6801E) in Bamyan province, about 200km west of Kabul (Fig.1). It is the largest iron ore reserve located in Afghanistan. There exists some previous exploration in the Hajigak area for iron deposits in 1960s and 1970s by Russian, Afghan and French geologists. However, little is known about the formation and the age of mineralization/host rocks of the deposit and therefore this giant deposit is not developed for exploitation until now. Several large to medium size and numerous smaller ore bodies occur in a North-East to South-West directed band within a major fault zone (Herat fault) as sub-concordant sheets and lenses in Proterozoic (?) metasedimentary and meta-volcanic rocks. The study in the 1960s demonstrated the mineral potential of the region, and estimated for the immediate Hajigak deposit resources of 1800 million tons of iron ore with a concentration of approximately 62 % Fe. This assessment ranks the Hajigak deposit as world-class and comparable with large iron deposits in the world.

Geology of the region

The oldest rocks of the region belong to the Paleo-Proterozoic Paymuri Group located 5km northwest of the deposit and composed of gneiss, crystalline schist, marble and amphibolite. Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Jawkul Formation (1000m) composed of crystalline schist, quartzite and marble overly the Paymuri Group. They are located in the footwall of deposit (Fig.1). All ore bodies of Hajigak deposit are located inside of metavolcano-sedimentary series named Kalu Group that built up by three major units. The Kab Formation (3500m) in the footwall of the main ore bodies and the Awband Formation (300-1000m), the main host of the iron ore bodies, which are bedded in slate, phyllite, schist, dolomitic marble and quartzite. The Green Schist Formation (700m) mainly consisting of meta-andesitic volcanics and doleritic sill and dikes, forms part of the hanging wall of the deposits. It is overlain by the Hajigak Formation (900m), composed of limestone, dolomite, sandy limestone and conglomerate. Brachiopods found allow dating the formation into Upper Devonian. The Upper Carboniferous Kharzar Formation (2500m) with pelitic schists, conglomerates and quartzites, unconformably overlies the Hajigak Formation. Finally, a large complex of tertiary Kuhe Baba Granitoids intruded the older rocks of the region a few kilometeres south of the deposit alongside of a major fault. Many mafic sills and dikes (gabbro and dolerite) in different generations intruded these formations; especially the upper part of the Kalu Group (Green Schist Formation) and some of these intrusions are near to ore bodies. Underlying and overlying rocks are almost everywhere in sharp contact with iron ores and in the most areas the ore bodies lay conformably in these host rocks. There is no agreement concerning the age of this group. Some former workers based on stratigraphy assumed a lower paleozoic age (Kusov etal, 1964, Bouladon and de Lapparent, 1975) but other Afghan-Russian workers based on regional geology and correlation with eastern and western formations believed on early new-proterozoic age (Abdullah

2011

Progress Report
and Chemyriov, 1980). No radiometric age determination has been done until now and the question remained unclear. Due to metamorphism and hydrothermal alteration of these rocks, the age determination is difficult and needs using some advanced but expensive methods and techniques of analyses, for example precise radiometric dating.

Figure 1: Location map of Hajigak and structure of Afghanistan (up) and geologic map of the main deposits (down). Modified and redrawn after Afghanistan Geological Survey work (Kusov et al, 1965).

2011

Progress Report
Fieldwork
In August and September 2010 extensive fieldwork were conducted in the deposit area by the applicant and the main work was done in the central part of Hajigak region. Short visits were done in the eastern and western remote areas. During these fieldworks, including sampling, all important geological data have been taken and all formations and stratigraphic units have been mapped. In turn to get fresh material, the samples were taken from less altered outcrops and from former exploration holes, shafts, trenches and adits. The most important results of these fieldworks that will help our project greatly are as follows: First time sampling from a newly discovered iron ore deposit of Hajigak type alongside of the Herat fault in far west of the province in Siahdarra, Yakawlang district. Detection of a new and important outcrop of iron oxide pillow like structures inside of the main Hajigak deposit. Detection and sampling of less altered outcrops of magnetite -pyrite ore type and of banded hematitequartz ores. After primary evaluation of data and examination of samples, 150 representatives and less altered samples were selected for chemical laboratory analyses and transported to Steinmann Institute (Bonn University).

Laboratory work
From October 2010 to April 2011, the following laboratory works have been done in Steinmann Institute of Bonn University: - 120 samples prepared for geochemical and mineralogical analyses - Textural and micro structural study of thin sections by polarization microscopy - Textural and mineralogical study of polished sections by reflected light microscopy - X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyses for trace and major elements of all samples - X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses for all samples - Electron microprobe analyses (EMPA) of some selected samples - Elemental analyses of selected samples for Carbon and Sulphur content (CNS) - Correcting and redrawing geological map of study area

Petrography and mineralogy

Mineralogy and petrology of ores and host rocks were studied by reflection, transmission and EMPA microscopy and were determined by XRD. Based on these studies, mineralogical compositions of the deposit are as follows: Main ore minerals: Magnetite (Fe3O4), Hematite and Martite (Fe2O3), Goethite (FeOOH). Minor ore minerals: Ankerite (CaFe(CO3)2), Siderite (FeCO3), Barite (BaSO4),Pyrite (FeS2), Pyrrhotite (FeS ), Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2), Chamosite (Fe2+, Mg, Al, Fe3+) 6(Si, Al)4O10(OH,O)8. Gangue minerals: Quartz and Chert (SiO2), Calcite (CaCO3), Dolomite (CaMg (CO3)2, some other minor/trace phases like mica (sericite), albite, talc, and clay minerals. Some of these phases are enriched in iron. Ore textures are massive, semi-banded and fine to medium granular. Replacement textures and evidence of hypogene and supergene alterations are observed in most of the samples. The composition of the host rocks shows a stronger variation due to the differences in age and type. However, in almost all of them iron bearing minerals are present and sometimes reach to more than 10 % of the total

2011

Progress Report
mineral content. The Awband Formation, the main host rock, is composed of quartz-sericite schist, derived from clayey material, quartz-sericite-chlorite schist, derived from mafic to intermediate tuffs, quartzite chert) and calcite-dolomite marble.

Geochemistry
XRF analyses of 153 samples and EMPA analyses of some selected ones have been effectuated. A comparison of the results reveals that the deposit composition in major elements is comparable with some well known high grade iron ore deposits from around the world however with higher S but lower P and Ti content (Fig.2). In trace elements composition (Fig.3), it shows enrichment in some elements like Mn, Ba, Sr, Zn, Pb,V, W and light REE (Ce) but depletion in Cr, Co, Ni, Rb and heavy REE (Yb).

Figure 2. Comparison of major oxides and LOI of high grade iron ores from Hajigak deposit with other important iron ore deposits: Hamersley, Minas gerais (Superior type), Orissa (Algoma type), Rapitan BIF and Gol Gohar (Rapitan type).

Figure 3. Average whole rock XRF analysed trace element compositions of different ore types of Hajigak deposit.

2011

Progress Report
From the geochemical and microscopical results we can conclude some preliminary aspects of formation of the deposit as below. However, more detailed analyses are needed for the final development of a genetic model for the deposit. Isotope analyses are also necessary to precise the origin and age of iron ore formation. One of the big challenges for this project is that until now Hajigak iron ore deposit not exactly fits to any available metallogenic model. Numerous papers and models about different iron ore deposits from around the world have been reviewed, but still with these results, it remains difficult to describe the formation of the deposit. However, XRF whole rock trace elements and EMPA analyses of magnetite and hematite ores of Hajigak deposit show some correlation with chemical sedimentary (BIF) and hydrothermal related (IOCG) iron ore deposits (Fig.4).

Figure 4. Ca+Al+Mn vs. Ti+V discriminant diagram for average compositions of magnetite and hematite in various ore bodies of Hajigak deposit. Each magnetite and hematite point represents the average composition that was analysed by EMPA in one sample. (Border lines from Dupuis and Beaudoin, 2011).

Future works
According to attached timetable, the future plan for next year is as follow:

Completing current geochemical analyses. Fieldwork (summer 2011). Detailed geochemical analyses of REE and some other trace elements with ICP-Ms. Sample preparation and analyses of new samples (September-October 2011). Stable isotope analyses (O, S and Fe). Geochronology and radiometric isotope analyses. Data interpretation (October-January 2011). Writing thesis, papers and posters (January to December 2012).

2011

Progress Report

References
Abdullah, Sh., Chmyriov, V.M., Stazhilo-Alekseev, K.F., Dronov, V.I., Gannan, P.J., Rossovskiy, L.N., Kafarskiy, A.Kh. and Malyarov, E.P., 1980, Geology and Mineral resources of Afghanistan (2nd ed.): Kabul, Afghanistan, Republic of Afghanistan Geological and Mineral Survey, 419 pp. Babaki,A. and Aftabi, A.J., 2005, Investigation on the Model of Iron Mineralization at Gol Gohar Iron Deposit, SirjanKerman, Iranian Geosciences Journal(Persian) 16, No.6 40-59. Bekker,A., et al, 2010, Iron Formation: The sedimentary product of a complex interplay among mantle, Tectonic, oceanic and biospheric processes. Econ. Geol. 105, 837873. Bouladon, J. and de Lapparent, A.F., 1975, Le mineral de fer d'Hajigak (Afghanistan); position stratigraphique, cadre geologique et type du gisement, (The Iron ore of Hajigak Pass, Afghanistan; stratigraphic position, geological evolution and type of deposit) Mineralium Deposita, 10, no. 1, 1325. Doebrich, J.L. and Wahl, R.R., 2006, Geologic and mineral resource map of Afghanistan: USGS/AGS File Report 2006 1038.

Dupuis, C.

&

Beaudoin,G., 2011, Discriminant diagrams for iron oxide trace element fingerprinting of mineral

deposit types. Mineralium Deposita, Online First, 7 February 2011. Klein, C., Beukes, N.J., 1993, Sedimentology and geochemistry of the glaciogenic Late Proterozoic Rapitan Iron-Formation in Canada. Econ. Geol. 88, 542565. Kusov, I.K., Smirnov, M.S. and Reshetanyak, V.V., 1965, Report on prospecting and survey at iron occurrences in central Afghanistan and the Hajigak iron deposit's estimated reserves, AGS, Kabul, unpub. data. Hitzman, MW., Oreskes N.O. and Einaudi, MT., 1992, Geological characteristics and tectonic setting of Proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-REE) deposits. Precambrian Res 58, 241287. Morris, R C., and Horwitz, R C., 1983, the origin of the iron formation-rich Hamersley Group of Western Australia: Deposition on a platform; Precamb. Res. 21, 273297. Morris, R.C., 1993, Genetic modeling for banded iron-formations of the Hamersley Group, Pilbara Craton,Western Australia. Precambrian Res. 60, 243286. Peters, Stephen G., 2007, Chemical sedimentary deposits in Afghanistan: USGS/AGS File Report. Powell C M A., Oliver N H., Li Z X., Martin D M B. and Ronaszeki J., 1999, Synorogenic hydrothermal origin for giant Hamersley iron oxide ore bodies; Geology 27, 175178. Roy,S., and Venkatesh, A S., 2009, Mineralogy and geochemistry of banded iron formation and iron ores from eastern India with implications on their genesis. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 118, No. 6, 619641. Spier CA., Oliveira SMB., Sial AN, Rios FJ., 2007, Geochemistry and genesis of the banded iron formations of the Cau Formation, Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Precambrian Res152,170206. Taylor D., Dalstra H J., Harding A. E., Broadbent G C. and Barley M E., 2001, Genesis of high grade hematite ore bodies of the Hamersley Province, Western Australia; Econ. Geol. 96, 837873. Thorne W S., Hagemann S G. and Barley M., 2004, Petrographic and geochemical evidence for the hydrothermal evolution of the North Deposit, Mt. Tom Price, Western Australia; Mineral. Depos. 39, 766783. Wolfart, R. and Wittekindt, H., 1980, Geology von Afghanistan. Beitrge zur Regionalen Geologic der Erde, Berlin, 500 pp.

2011