Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Life / France
Rating Outlook
Revised Sector Outlook: Fitch Ratings has revised the rating outlook for the French life insurance sector to negative from stable. A negative sector outlook indicates that the agency believes that a material portion of life insurer ratings could be downgraded as they are reviewed over the next 12-24 months. Challenging Operating Environment: The French insurance industry is facing a number of challenges, which have been amplified by the financial crisis. Although the sector has shown some resilience, the challenging interest rate environment and unfavourable business mix will continue to penalise life insurers' profitability and solvency. Profitability Under Pressure: Fitch expects net collections to decrease materially in 20112012 due to lower premiums and higher lapses, which indicates that the market is becoming increasingly mature. Life insurers' profitability remains under pressure. Margins on eurodenominated products are weak, mainly due to the low interest rate environment, which should lead the majority of life insurers to further reduce returns offered to policyholders. Capital Adequacy Under Pressure: Financial market volatility is putting pressure on sales of unit-linked (UL) policies, which typically generate high margins in France. Capital adequacy is also being affected by unfavourable trends in Southern European government bonds, although exposure is not spread equally over the sector.
NEGATIVE
Related Research
Other Outlooks
www.fitchratings.com/outlooks
Analysts
Marc-Philippe Juilliard +33 1 44 29 91 37 marcphilippe.juilliard@fitchratings.com Vanessa Flores +33 1 44 29 92 77 vanessa.flores@fitchratings.com
www.fitchratings.com
3 October 2011
Insurance
Key Issues
Fitch believes that improvements in life insurers' profitability and capital adequacy will depend on the extent to which they reduce the returns offered to their policyholders for 2011, assuming deterioration in the earned investment return as a central scenario. The still significant gap between guaranteed interest rates on life products (1% on average) and actual returns credited by life insurers (3.4% on average for 2010) gives them flexibility to adjust the bonus rates they pay for 2011. The agency notes that, if substantial, this reduction in bonus rates would be beneficial for insurers' profitability and solvency, both of which are suffering from the low yields on most Northern European government bonds and the deteriorated credit quality of several Southern European government bonds. In addition, profitability and solvency will both remain adversely affected by business mix, which is biased towards euro-denominated products, to the detriment of unit-linked policies. In terms of gross premiums, Fitch expects an annual average single-digit percentage drop in the foreseeable future, although this will be highly dependent on the financial and economic environment, notably interest rates and competition from banking products. In addition, premiums collected on UL policies are likely to continue to be hampered by volatility in equity markets. Lastly, as the life insurance market gradually reaches maturity, benefit payments will continue to increase, putting significant pressure on net collections. Fitch considers that the major challenge for life insurers in the coming years will be to gradually reduce their reliance on traditional euro savings-type life insurance and focus more on selling products that deliver healthier margins, such as protection policies.
Sector Overview
Life premiums rose just 3.5% yoy to EUR143bn in 2010, indicating that the significant recovery experienced in 2009 (+13%) after the financial crisis was not a trend. This growth rate is significantly below the historical average and, as a consequence, Fitch believes the market should increasingly be viewed as mature. At the same time, net collections (defined as premiums collected less benefits paid to policyholders) remained stable on 2009 at around EUR50bn. However, this amount remained below pre-crisis levels. Life insurance products continue to penetrate the addressable market and account for a large part of French households' financial savings (around 40% in 2010 compared with only 4.5% in 1980). In addition, life insurance accounted for about 70% of new money invested in financial assets in 2010 (64% on average over the past 10 years).
Figure 1
1146
1990
128
1991
157
1992
190
1993
232
1994
275
1995
325
1996
386
1997
456
1998
508
1999
576
2000
636
2001
676
2002
711
2003
771
2004
840
2005
957
2006
1053
2007
2008
1142
2009
1233
Source: FFSA-GEMA
Related Criteria
Insurance Rating Methodology (Sept 2011)
2010
1317
Insurance
Current Trends
Returns Still Attractive But Decreasing
Returns offered to policyholders onlife insurance products have gradually shrunk since 1990, adversely affected by the structural decline in interest rates. In 2010, policyholders' returns paid on euro-denominated policies averaged 3.4% (2009: 3.7%; 2008: 4%). Nevertheless, the competitive position of life insurance products did not deteriorate in 20092010, mainly due to the less attractive yields offered by short-term bank deposit-type investment products in that period. In particular, yields offered by Livret A passbook and other short-term banking deposits significantly declined from their 4% peak reached in August 2008 to a low of 1.25% in August 2009 and 1.75% at end-2010.
Based on a sample of six of the top 10 life insurers, representing 58% of premiums collected in the market, Fitch estimates that life insurers increased their Provision pour participation aux excedents (PPE) profit-sharing reserves in 2010 (stable in 2009). The majority of life insurers had released part of their buffer reserves in 2008 in order to maintain attractive yields in a challenging financial environment. Short-term interest rates have started to recover in 2011. Yields offered by Livret A passbook deposits increased to 2.25% in August 2011. This has contributed to the poor performance of life insurance premiums (euro-denominated premiums decreased by 13% during the first six months of 2011 compared with the same period in 2010) and more than ever puts life insurers' decisions on returns offered to their policyholders for 2011 under the spotlight.
Flight to Security
The bulk (around 86%) of life insurance premiums were concentrated on guaranteed products in 2010 as policyholders maintained their preference for capital guaranteed products in a still uncertain financial environment. Asset risks taken by insurers on these products are becoming smaller, explaining the weak margins earned by the industry and the decline in yields offered to
Insurance
policyholders. More aggressive asset allocation tends to be made by insurers only on UL products, where policyholders bear the investment risk. Premiums collected on UL policies are strongly correlated with developments in equity markets, albeit with a lag. In 2010, premiums collected on these products increased by 11% compared with 2009, after declining by an average 26% per year during 2007-2009. UL policies accounted for 13% of total premiums collected by French life insurers in 2010, significantly below the proportion reached in 2007 (27%) before the financial crisis. In the first six months of 2011, the lower volatility of equity markets did not convince policyholders to reinvest in UL products, with no growth reported in these products. In addition, given the substantial fall in the CAC40 index since end-June 2011, it will take some time for investors to return to these products, as investment decisions by policyholders are typically largely based on recent stock market performance.
Premiums (EURbn) 24.4 22.4 15.3 12.2 11.5 11.4 6.7 5.9 5.8 5.7 121.3
Market share (%) 17.0 15.6 10.7 8.5 8.0 8.0 4.7 4.1 4.1 4.0 84.7
Insurance
Distribution via the internet continues to expand, as promoted by large groups (for example, Generali France, Nord Europe Assurance and Crdit Agricole Assurances). Due to its efficient cost structure, this channel offers attractive terms and conditions, such as the absence of entry fees. However, a number of policyholders continue to demand the expertise and advice provided by face-to-face distribution. Although fast growing, internet sales still accounted for only about 3% of total premiums collected in 2010.
Market Outlook
Negative Trend in Net New Business
Fitch notes that the savings-type life insurance market is highly dependent on the financial and economic environment. In this context, the lower gap between policyholders' returns and returns on short- to medium-term savings products offered by banks is expected to put significant pressure on new collections in 2011 onwards. In addition, the guaranteed interest rates that insurers can offer on their life insurance contracts have been further restricted by new regulations since August 2010, limiting their ability to implement promotional rates. Although generally few multi-year guarantees have been provided on life insurance contracts since the late 1990s, this now permanently prevents insurers from gaining new clients by offering higher-than-regulated guarantees over short periods. Lastly, there is a risk of dissatisfaction among life insurance policyholders in case of a sharp increase in interest rates. This is because they would not benefit from the upside, being mainly holders of euro-denominated products with average expected returns in the 3%-3.5% range. Also, due to recent high volatility on equity markets, unit-linked business is likely to suffer in the foreseeable future despite commercial efforts being made by life insurance sales networks to boost this business.
Insurance
Benefit Payments Likely to Increase Further
Benefits paid to policyholders include early redemptions of policies and sums paid out on the maturity of the policies (death-related claims, lump sums and annuities). Benefits held steady at around 40% of premiums for most of the 1990s, but have gradually increased in relative terms since 1998, reaching 64% in 2010. Regulations governing early redemptions are not particularly restrictive for policyholders. At least 95% of actuarial provisions are returned to the policyholder in the case of early redemption, which acts as only a minor deterrent on the cancellation option. However, the tax regime applicable to early redemptions, whether partial or total, may penalise policyholders more and hence is more of a deterrent. This is particularly true for policies that have less than eight years' history. In the medium and long term, Fitch does not expect net collections to remain as strong as in the past, as the life insurance market is gradually maturing after two decades of strong growth, leading to further increases in benefit payments. Net collections decreased by 50% over the first six months of 2011 to EUR17bn, compared with the same period in 2010, as benefit payments accounted for a substantial 75% of premiums during the period. Some insurers mention partial lapses made by just retired policyholders as one of the reasons for this unfavourable trend. In addition, more than 50% of life technical reserves consist of old contracts (more than eight years old, which is the threshold for the most favourable tax treatment in France). For this reason, Fitch considers that the industry traditional insurers in particular will have difficulty retaining the amounts paid back, and will risk losing these funds to competition from banks if it is unable to offer attractive offers such as retail banking solutions.
Insurance
In terms of solvency, French life insurance companies' capital adequacy has been cyclical since 2000. This volatility has not been the result of changes in companies' capital or surpluses; rather, it has been due to fluctuations in the level of unrealised gains, which are integrated into the calculations of the statutory Solvency I ratio. In 2010, the mediocre performance of equity and sovereign debt markets had a negative impact on life insurers' regulatory solvency ratios as unrealised capital gains reported in 2009 by life insurers (EUR70bn) diminished to EUR57bn at end-2010. French life insurers reported more-thanadequate regulatory solvency margins at end-2010 (160% of the minimum required). Nevertheless, the level of life insurers' solvency in 2010 remained below that reached before the economic crisis in 2007 (see Figure 4).
Figure 4
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Source FFSA-GEMA
Fitch believes the poor performance of equity markets since mid-2011 (CAC40 index down by around 20%) will have a negative impact on life insurers' solvency. In addition, the business mix shift towards euro-denominated products will continue to affect solvency margins as eurodenominated policies require a much higher solvency margin than UL policies. Lastly, the application of Solvency II rules expected in 2013 will mean higher capital requirements for insurers who, in order to increase their capital adequacy, will be compelled to substantially improve their retained earnings. Fitch notes that this will be the major challenge for French life insurers in the coming years and a difficult one considering the continuing compression of their margins. The exercise will be all the more difficult as insurers will be penalised from a solvency perspective if they take risks on the asset side.
2010
Insurance
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE.
Copyright 2011 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitchs factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdi ction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitchs ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offeri ng documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assi gnment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of Great Britain, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.