You are on page 1of 48

High Performance

Liquid Chromatography
Barba, Biadomang, Dulos
CHEM 127.1
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Caffeine

belongs to a group of
alkaloids called xanthines

sample in this
experiment

beverage
Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC

Before: large columns, large particles, under


gravity feed, manual collection of fractions of
eluents

Giddings Prediction: smaller particles, under


Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC

Csaba Horvath and


colleague S.R. Lipsky

built rst HPLC

But, in 1970s

small silanized
particles allowed use
of small-volume
columns=high
resolution
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Principles

In LC, rate of solute distribution between


S.P and M.P

diffusion-controlled

to minimize diffusion and time required for


the movement of sample and from
interaction sites in the column

smaller eddy diffusion (small A value)


Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC

B is usually small for


liquids

small molecular
diffusion

A is usually small and


almost constant for
liquids
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Stationary phase

HPLC microparticles: high-purity silica

low in trace metal content

5 to 10 micrometers in diameter

pore sizes: 60 to 100 angstroms, 300 for


large biomolecules

It can be partition (liquid-liquid) or


adsorption
Saturday, October 8, 2011

microporous

10 micrometers

permeable to solvent

e.g. silica gel

perfusion

12 micrometers
Saturday, October 8, 2011

Pump

forces the mobile phase

specic ow rate

isochratic or gradient

Injector

introduces liquid sample


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Pump

Isocratic

preparative

Gradient

analysis
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Pump
Saturday, October 8, 2011

Reversed phase

nonpolar S.P. polar M.P.

S.P: aromatic or heterocycles to provide to


interactions

dispersive forces

Normal phase

polar S.P. nonpolar M.P.


Saturday, October 8, 2011

Spectroscopic

UV absorption

MS detection

Refractive Index

RI: measure of molecules ability to


deect light
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC
Saturday, October 8, 2011

HPLC can be used for quantitative and qualitative


analysis

preparation of pure compounds


Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC
Saturday, October 8, 2011
HPLC demonstration
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Methodology
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Preparation of Caffeine
Standard
lor dlerenL concenLrauons of
caelne soluuons
3 100mL vol asks. Welgh 2.3,
3.0, 7.3 and 10.0 mg caelne

dlluLe Lo mark wlLh
meLhanol:P
2
C (2:8) (M),
ad[usL pP=3 wlLh P
3
C
4
phosphaLe buer-conLrol pP, neuLrallze
charges on S and neuLrallze charges on
analyLe
solvenL-polar, commonly used wlLh C
18
columns
MeLhanol: n modler
MlxLure: waLer, meLhanol assoclaLed wlLh
waLer
shake, degas (3mlns), lLer
(0.43m lLer membrane)

Shaklng - ensure dlssoluuon
uegasslng - P
2
C has hlgh dlssolved
gas conLenL, come ouL and be
enLrapped, aecL reLenuon ume
lllLer - remove oLher parucles and
unlformlLy of slze
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Cn=pump and deLecLor,
pump ow raLe=2.3mL/mln,
deLecLor
sensluvlLy=0.08AulS

Cn=recorder, slow speed raLe,
prlor ln[ecuon, allow M Lo
pass (3-10mlns),
slmulLaneously record deLecLor
response


1o sLarL readlng
AulS = absorbance unlL full scale
w/ syrlnge, ln[ecL 23L
caelne sLd sLarung wlLh
leasL concenLraLed. 1ake
dupllcaLe chromaLograms
for dl sLds

Lnsure no lnLerferlng subsLances are
presenL ln Lhe column
S: Slllca bonded Lo alkyl chaln (C
18
)
- non polar, hydrophoblc
1o obLaln sLandard
chromaLograms
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Determination of Caffeine in Coffee and
Measure amounL of caelne
ln coee

0.3mL coee ln 23mL vol
ask


0.3mL Lea ln 23mL vol ask

Measure amounL of caelne
ln Lea

dlluLe Lo mark w/
meLhanol:waLer (2:8)

Same solvenL sysLem
lollow same sLeps ln A

Saturday, October 8, 2011
Determination of Caffeine in Cola
Beverage
Cease bubbllng
10mL cold beverage ln
beaker. pour back and forLh
alLernauve: beaker ln
ulLrasonlcaLor (3mlns)
1o decarbonaLe Lhe soda

100mL cola bev ln 23mL vol
ask. dlluLe Lo mark w/
meLhanol:waLer (2:8)

Measure caelne ln soda
Same solvenL sysLem
Saturday, October 8, 2011
lollow sLeps ln A.


Aer experlmenL, wash
column w/ 30mL solvenL
(noL ad[usLed Lo pP-3.3

washlng sLep"
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Results and Discussion
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Chromatogram
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Peak Area

Area under each single


response

Can be correlated to the


concentration of the
sample
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Retention time

Distance of the peak


maxima from the
injection point
expressed in time units

Serve as identier for


given analyte on that
particular system

Most easily measurable


parameter
!
"#
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Red time/Void time (t
0
)

Retention of non-retained analyte

Part of the total analyte retention time that


the analyte spends in the mobile phase
moving through the column

Serves as correction factor and allows


validation of ow rate

i.e. thiourea, uracil, and NaNO


3
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Retention Factor (k)

Or capacity factor

Dimensionless, and independent on mobile


phase ow rate and column dimensions

For reproducibility, characteristic of a


chromatographic system
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Retention Factor (k)

Ratio of reduced retention time to void time


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Selectivity factor ()

Ability of chromatographic system to


discriminate different analytes

Ratio of retention factors

Primarily dependent on the nature of the


analytes and their interaction with the
stationary phase
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Resolution

Ratio of distance between two peaks to the


average width of these peaks at baseline

Encompasses both efciency and selectivity

Has to be 1.5 to be completely separated


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Efciency: Plate theory

Column is considered to be divided into a


number of hypothetical plates

Each plate has nite height (height of


effective theoretical plate, HETP) and the
analyte spends a nite time in this plate

Smaller plate height or greater number of


plates, more efcient separation
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Efciency: Plate theory

Measure of chromatographic band broadening


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Sensitivity

Limits of detection

lowest quantity of a substance that can


be distinguished from the absence of that
substance within a stated condence limit

Limits of quantication

concentration at which quantitative


results can be reported with a high
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Calibration

External Standard Calibration

injection of a series of standards with


known concentration

peak area vs concentration

samples must have no variation in


injection volume
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Calibration

Internal Standard Calibration

internal standard as an additional


component

xed volume added to all samples


(eliminated variations with injection
volume)

must be eluted with a suitable gap from


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Calibration

Internal Standard Calibration

Standards must

have similar in analytical behaviour

not expected to be found in the samples

soluble in the same solvent/eluent

not a degradation product of the sample

not affected by target analytes, surrogates, or by


matrix interferences
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Calibration

Internal Standard Calibration

not as useful for GC and HPLC methods with


non-MS detectors, unless the internal
standards could be separated from target
compounds chromatographically

for determination of caffeine, some internal


Saturday, October 8, 2011
Calculation of
Standards
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Peak Area vs
Concentration
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Concentration of
Samples
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Conclusions
Saturday, October 8, 2011

In this experiment, concentration levels of


caffeine in tea, coffee, and cola beverages
were determined quantitatively by HPLC

Obtain chromatogram: x-axis (retention


time) and y-axis (intensity of the response)

Peaks observed were the result of the


sample run where the size of the peak is
proportional to the concentration of the
Saturday, October 8, 2011

0.1892 M and 0.1587 M are the caffeine


concentration detected for Great Taste,
0.008933 M and 0.009751 M for Lipton,
0.003162 M and 0.003198 M for Pop, and
0.005174 M and 0.0005273 M for Zesto

Average values for both calculated values


result a caffeine concentration of 0.174 M
for Great Taste, 9.342 mM for Lipton, 3.18
mM for Pop, and 5.491 mM for Zesto
Saturday, October 8, 2011
END
Saturday, October 8, 2011

You might also like