Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Issue 31
Issue 31
World economy faces 'lost decade', says Russian finance minister Alexei Kudrin
The world economy faces a lost decade of low growth even though it is still possible to stave off another global recession; Russia's finance minister was quoted as saying on Saturday. "We are probably faced with a lost decade. It is already obvious that growth rates are going to be low," Alexei Kudrin told Russian reporters on the sidelines of the G20 finance ministers meeting in Washington. "The fight with a fading of growth is going to take many years, most likely 5-10 years," Kudrin, one of the world's longest serving finance ministers who has been in his post since May 2000, said it was not inevitable that there would be a new global recession as in 2008 but the risks had increased. "The last days have shown that the risks we have talked about are very real and some market indicators have already reached the level of the last crisis in 2008." According to Kudrin, one of the differences with the crisis in 2008 is that participants now understood the magnitude of the risks. "Today we are looking at all the risk zones more seriously and thus the anxiety is probably greater but the crisis itself could turn out to be milder than in 2008," he added. Click Here
birthplace. Twenty-four centuries later, Greece is at the edge of the biggest sovereign default and policy makers are worried about global shock waves of a insolvency by a government with 353 billion ($483 billion) of debt -- five times the size of Argentina's $95 billion default in 2001. Click Here
Global crisis: Why China can't and won't save the world
The most China can realistically do for the struggling global economy is to ensure its own growth holds up, and that won't be nearly enough to lift the world. Visions of China putting its $3.2 trillion in reserves to work by launching another government spending spree or buying up European bonds ignore the political and economic reality that China, like any other country, puts its own needs first. Right now, China's economy doesn't need more stimulus and its leaders are wary of making bad bets on European debt, which means if conditions worsen in the United States or Europe, China would respond only if and when trouble shows up at home. To offset the impact of a 3 per cent drop in US and European growth, China would need to increase its own growth by 18 per cent, he said. Click Here GLOBAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Issue 31
Issue 31
Jargon Mania
Derivatives: A derivative instrument is a contract between two parties that specifies conditionsin particular, dates and the resulting values of the underlying variablesunder which payments, or payoffs, are to be made between the parties. Derivatives are broadly categorized by the relationship between the underlying asset and the derivative (e.g., forward, option, swap); the type of underlying asset (e.g., equity derivatives, foreign exchange derivatives, interest rate derivatives, commodity derivatives, or credit derivatives); the market in which they trade (e.g., exchange-traded or overthe-counter); and their pay-off profile. Derivatives can be used for speculating purposes ("bets") or to hedge ("insurance"). Economic Value Added: A measure of a company's financial performance based on the residual wealth calculated by deducting cost of capital from its operating profit (adjusted for taxes on a cash basis). (Also referred to as "Economic Profit".) The formula for calculating EVA is as follows: = Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) - (Capital * Cost of Capital) This measure was devised by Stern Stewart & Co. Economic value added attempts to capture the true economic profit of a company. Portfolio: The term portfolio refers to any collection of financial assets such as stocks, bonds and cash. Portfolios may be held by individual investors and/or managed by financial professionals, hedge funds, banks and other financial institutions. It is a generally accepted principle that a portfolio is designed according to the investor's risk tolerance, time frame and investment objectives. The dollar amount of each asset may influence the risk/reward ratio of the portfolio and is referred to as the asset allocation of the portfolio. There are many types of portfolios including the Market Portfolio and the Zero-Investment Portfolio. A portfolio's asset allocation may be managed utilizing any of the following investment approaches and principles: equally-weighting, capitalization-weighting, price-weighting, Risk parity, Capital asset pricing model, Arbitrage pricing theory, Jensen Index, Treynor Index, Sharpe Diagonal (or Index) model, Value at risk model, Modern Portfolio Theory and others.
Issue 31
Jargon Mania
Channel Distribution: Distribution is a very important component of Logistics & Supply chain management. Distribution in supply chain management refers to the distribution of a good from one business to another. It can be factory to supplier, supplier to retailer, or retailer to end customer. It is defined as a chain of intermediaries, each passing the product down the chain to the next organization, before it finally reaches the consumer or end-user. This process is known as the 'distribution chain' or the 'channel.' Each of the elements in these chains will have their own specific needs, which the producer must take into account, along with those of the all-important end-user. A number of alternative 'channels' of distribution may be available:
Distributor, who sells to retailers via direct marketing, or brokers can also be used, Retailer (also called dealer or reseller), who sells to end customers Direct Distribution (Direct Marketing), where an organization sells its products directly to the end customer. For example in case of online purchases (Internet Marketing and E-commerce) there will be the seller and customer. For this the seller and the customer may depend on various shipping providers. Advertisement typically used for the consumption goods
Generic brand: Generic brands of consumer products (often supermarket goods) are distinguished by the absence of a brand name. It is often inaccurate to describe these products as "lacking a brand name", as they usually are branded, albeit with either the brand of the store in which they are sold or a lesser-known brand name which may not be aggressively advertised to the public. They are identified more by product characteristics. Generic brands are usually priced below those products sold by supermarkets under their own brand (frequently referred to as "store brands" or "own brands"). Generally they imitate these more expensive brands, competing on price. Generic brand products are often of equal quality as a branded product; however, the quality may change suddenly in either direction with no change in the packaging if the supplier for the product changes.
Strategic Market Planning: The planning process that yields decisions in how a business unit can best compete in the markets it elects to serve. The strategic plan is based upon the totality of the marketing process.
Issue 31
Great depression and 2011: The crucial difference between then and now
In the face of nothing but bad economic news, Americans often take heart in remembering that we have been here before - during the Great Depression, when conditions were far worse than they are today - and we survived. But there is a crucial difference between then and now: The words that our political leaders use to talk about our problems have changed. Where politicians once drew on a morally resonant language of people, family and shared social concern, they now deploy the cold technical idiom of budgetary accounting. This is more than a superficial difference in rhetoric. It threatens to deprive us of the intellectual resources needed to address today's problems. Turn back the clock to June 1934. Millions of Americans are out of work, losing their homes and facing more of the same. President Franklin D. Roosevelt responds by creating the Committee on Economic Security. To Congress, he stresses that he places "the security of the men, women and children of the nation first." All Americans, he emphasizes, "want decent homes to live in; they want to locate them where they can engage in productive work; and they want some safeguard against misfortunes which cannot be wholly eliminated in this man-made world of ours." Roosevelt asks the committee to propose "sound means" to secure against "several of the great disturbing factors in life - especially those which relate to unemployment and old age." Those "sound means" eventually emerge as the programs of Social Security pensions, old-age assistance and unemployment insurance. Fast forward to February 2010. With millions of Americans out of work, home foreclosures at historic highs and little prospect of relief for those in need, President Obama acts, establishing a National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. The commission's task is to "improve the fiscal situation," to "achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run" and to address "the growth of entitlement spending." The commission recommends, true to its charge, cuts in entitlement spending - that is, the programs established in 1935 and later years to aid the unemployed, aged, disabled and sick. In August 2011, Congress acts, not to aid those in distress but to cut federal spending. The stated goal of its new "super committee" is to create fiscal balance by recommending measures "to reduce the deficit" by at least $1.5 trillion over the next decade. Thus is the desperate situation of many Americans reduced to the clinical language of budgetary accounting. Social insurance programs that protect Americans against the common hazards of a market economy are "entitlements" that need to be revamped in the name of fiscal balance and deficit reduction. As an economic policy matter, we view cutting entitlement programs as a very bad idea. But we wish to make a more fundamental observation about language and the collective imagination that language reflects. In 1934, the focus was on people, family security and the risks to family economic well-being that we all share. Today, the people have disappeared. The conversation is now about the federal budget, not about the real economy in which real people live. If a moral concept plays a role in today's debates, it is only the stern proselytizing of forcing the government to live within its means. If the effect of government policy on average people is discussed, it is only as providing incentives for the sick to economize on medical costs and for the already strapped worker to save for retirement.